WEBVTT - 'My daughter’s murder could’ve been prevented’: Aggie Di Mauro Pt.1

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>The public has had a long held fascination with detectives.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:08.039
<v Speaker 1>Detective sy aside of life. The average person is never

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>exposed her I spent thirty four years as a cop.

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>For twenty five of those years I was catching killers.

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>That's what I did for a living. I was a

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>homicide detective. I'm no longer just interviewing bad guys. Instead,

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the public into the world in which I operated.

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>The guests I talk to each week have amazing stories

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>from all sides of the law. The interviews are raw

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and honest, just like the people I talk to. Some

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of the content and language might be confronting. That's because

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>no one who comes into contact with crime is left unchanged.

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Join me now, as I take you into this world.

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Can murders be prevented? It's a complex question, but one

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that Aggie de Moro is not afraid to ask. Aggie

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>is the mother of Celeste, a vibrant twenty three year

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>old whose life was brutally taken from her. She was

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 1>stabbed to death in her own home by a former

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>co worker she hardly knew, who was consumed by obsession. Today,

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Aggie joins me on I catch killers to make a

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>point that there's both heartbreaking and undeniable that Celeste's murder

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:20.960
<v Speaker 1>could have been prevented. Nothing said in this conversation will

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>bring Celeste back, but Aggie's voice matters, and if the

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>right people are listening, perhaps lessons can be learned, accountability

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>can be demanded, and real change can follow. Because stalking

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 1>is not harmless, it's dangerous, and far too often it

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 1>is deadly. It's time to wake up before something like

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>this happens again. Aggie Tomorrow, Welcome to I Catch Killers.

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Thank you Gary, and thank you for having me on.

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I know that you'd rather not be having a conversation

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>with me in the circumstances that we're having the conversation,

0:01:54.560 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>so I apologize upfront reliving things that are of very

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:04.559
<v Speaker 1>painful to you. But in the lengthy conversations that we've

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>had in the lead up to this podcast, there's some

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>very important messages that you want to get across. And

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:15.519
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you wholeheartedly on your concerns, concerns and

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>mixed with anger about what happened to Celeste, and the

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 1>fact that appears that no lessons have been learned from.

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Them, none whatsoever.

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:29.519
<v Speaker 1>Despite your all your efforts.

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Despite efforts, despite promises and commitments that were made, nothing's

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:35.799
<v Speaker 2>been on it.

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I've seen the pain that homicide causes. Unless you've been

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>affected by it directly, nobody knows what you're going through.

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>So my condolences for the pain that you're carrying.

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Still. Thank you, Gary, I appreciate it.

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Before we start speaking about what our concerns are, things

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that haven't been done, I think it's appropriate that you

0:02:57.240 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>tell everyone the type of lady celest was, the type

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of young girl, the daughter that you knew, just so

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>people understand what we're talking about here.

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Celeste was twenty three years old. She had completed her

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 2>bachelor's degree in criminology and psychology. She still had one

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 2>more year, her honest year, to do, but decided to

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 2>take a gap. Found employment at an agency called SOCO,

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 2>which basically the department she worked in was handling contracts

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 2>for services Australia. Became a team leader within six months,

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 2>was there two and a half years. Celeste was this kind, gentle,

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 2>loving young woman. She's just happy, go lucky, saw the

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 2>positive in everything, always wanted to help people if she could.

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 2>She was just a ray of sunshine. Honestly, she'd walk

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 2>in a room and people were just drawn to her.

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 2>They were drawn to her presence, her smile, just everything

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 2>about her. So she was just a beautiful soul while

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 2>she started working there in June of twenty eighteen. About

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 2>a year later, she was handed over a new team

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 2>to lead. She was upset the night, she told me,

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 2>because she loved her previous team, but she'd done great

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 2>work with them, and one of the team manager's team

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 2>leaders had left, so they gave her a new team

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 2>to lead, and the beast we're going to refer to

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 2>was on that team. She was only his team leader

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 2>for about two months before he left the company. The organization,

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 2>and the way that came about was that he was

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 2>put on notice by management. One day he decided to

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 2>leave them in there, apologized for his behavior, and Celeste,

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 2>been his team leader, was required to walk him to

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 2>the exit door. She did so. She was telling me,

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, when she got home that night that she'd

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 2>experienced the most embarrassing moment of her life because she

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 2>felt quite bad for him. So she extended her hand

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 2>to shake his hand and wish him all the best

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 2>in his future endeavors. And what she didn't expect was

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 2>for him to kiss her on the cheek, so she

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 2>went apparently bright red. She said, Mama must have been

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:35.479
<v Speaker 2>tomato read. I was so embarrassed, And in that moment

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 2>I thought she had just been a little bit of

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 2>a drama queen. I said, don't worry about it. I

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 2>didn't even know who she was talking about. I thought

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 2>it was just a young kid, possibly her age, with

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 2>some crush on her.

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:49.919
<v Speaker 1>At twenty three, as much as Celeste with the thought

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>she was an adult. You are still a child at

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>that age, aren't you.

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, she didn't even look twenty three. You know, she's

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 2>still got as for id in some venues.

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>So I saw the pictures her and I can understand

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 1>why that would happen. Her choice of career or study

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>criminology and psychology is an interesting path to go down

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to too. Did she have dreams and aspirations what she

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do.

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 2>She wanted to help people. She used to do volunteer

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 2>help for some of you know, these not for profit

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 2>organizations where people can call in if they need some

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:25.840
<v Speaker 2>sort of help talking to someone. And she did that

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 2>for a while, volunteering with that. But you know, she

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 2>was a kind of kid at school, even in high school,

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 2>if she saw someone on their own, she'd approached them

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 2>and see if they're okay. She just didn't really like

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.039
<v Speaker 2>seeing people left out. So she just had this need

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 2>to assist people. And yeah, she thought that she was

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 2>a little bit undecided whether to go down legal studies,

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 2>lawyer sort of work or psychology, but she really wanted

0:06:56.320 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 2>to understand how people sought in, why they thought a

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:05.919
<v Speaker 2>particular way, how she could help them think differently. So yeah,

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 2>she was very interested in that.

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, sounds like she was a beautiful young lady that

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>would have contributed greatly to society. When we were discussing

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>about coming on the podcast, and it's not something you

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>openly wanted to do, but you wanted to get a

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>message across. You didn't want to relive what happened to

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Celeste see aftermath, and it's a lead up to what

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>happened that perhaps lessons could be learned or not, perhaps

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>lessons should be learned. If it's okay with you, just

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>so our listeners understand what we're talking about here for

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the few people that mightn't have heard about what happened

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to your daughter, is it all right with you if

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I just read out a summary of what's occurred. Yes,

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of course, Celeste was twenty three years old when she

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>was brutally murdered in her family home in the early

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>hours of the morning on the sixteenth of November twenty twenty.

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.679
<v Speaker 1>A former co worker, thirty five year old Leo Seiko,

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>who Celeste hardly knew, had become infatuated with her, and

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>in the twelve months leading up to her murder, he

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>bombarded her with messages, stalked her, and harassed her. It

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>made Celeste feel unsafe to the point that her mother

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and the daughter went to the police for help. The

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>initial cries for help with the police were just dismissed.

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>When the situation escalated and the communications became even more

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>concerning and of her sexual nature, you went to the

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>police again. This time your concerns were taken more seriously.

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>A personal safety intervention order was taken out, which Seko

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>bridged after Celeste posted a picture of herself and the

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>new boyfriend on social media. Seko went to your home

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>in the early hours of the morning when everyone was sleeping.

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Then he smashed his way in through her bedroom window

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>with a hammer and stabbed Celeste twenty three times in

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a violent, frenzied attack. During the attack, Celeste attempted to

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>defend herself, as shown by defensive wounds on the hands.

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>This brutal attack lasted only minutes. You her mother were

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>awakened by the noise and went to your daughter's bedroom,

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and she was dead. The murderer of the beasts you

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>referred to him, and I fully understand that had run

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>away by the time you'd entered the room. Seika discarded

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the phone he duws to harass and stalk Celeste, and

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>then handed himself into police. He denied aspects of the

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 1>offense and contested the matter through the courts for years

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>before finally pleading guilty after he could not convince the

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>courts he was not of a sound mind, and pleaded guilty.

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.959
<v Speaker 1>He was sentenced to thirty six years in prison. Aggie,

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:56.679
<v Speaker 1>that's just a brief overview. I want when people listen

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to this podcast, I want people to be angry. I

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>want people to be shocked. I want people to think

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>we've got to do things better. I think it's important

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to just spell out in the way that I did

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>what has actually happened here. Quite often crimes like this

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 1>looked at as statistics people don't give it a lot

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the thought it becomes a headline. Is there anything you

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>want to add to what I just read out?

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Earlier? You said that I was a little bit reluctant

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 2>to just do an interview because telling Celicia's story really

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 2>does put a toll on me. But you're right that

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 2>there are messages I need to get out there. I'm

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 2>very angry. It's been five and a half years. This

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 2>is not going to subside for me. It can't. I'm

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:48.959
<v Speaker 2>angry at many things. One the fact that absolutely this

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 2>could have been prevented. But outside of that, I've been

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 2>saying Celeste was failed again and again. She was failed

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 2>by not being taken seriously the first time, but she

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 2>was also failed once she was murdered. So you know,

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 2>you got to the fact that he received thirty six

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 2>years non parole thirty We have a system that will

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 2>continue to excuse and justify offenders, murderers wanting, wanting, and

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 2>not only them wanting it, but telling us that we

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 2>want this, absolutely wanting a murderer's rehabilitation, which I don't

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:41.839
<v Speaker 2>believe any of us want. In Celeicester's case, in a nutshell,

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 2>and this was all came out at the plea hearing,

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 2>and obviously the judge read it out in her sentencing remarks,

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 2>but in Soleicsti's case, you have an offender who decides

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 2>to stalk a young woman who didn't even know him

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:04.319
<v Speaker 2>for well over a year. We have an intervention order

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:07.559
<v Speaker 2>in place that he decides to breach with a three

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 2>and a half page letter where he is pleading with

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Celeste to drop that intervention order. And there are many

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 2>messages in that intervention order that absolutely basically say drop

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 2>it or else. We don't drop it, and not because

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 2>I didn't consider it. I did want to do things differently,

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 2>and I'm sure we'll go there as well, but we

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 2>didn't drop it purely on police insistence to keep it

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 2>in place. He then buys a hammer and a knife

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 2>the very next day after he was arrested and released,

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 2>goes quiet for three months, leading us to believe that

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 2>he'd actually learnt his lesson and this was over, so

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 2>we've completely dropped our guard at this point. Three months

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 2>of silence from him goes as far as finding how

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 2>our address on Google Maps according to him, downhiads the

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 2>floor planned to the house to pinpoint Sir Leicester's room

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.679
<v Speaker 2>and in the middle of the night, jumps a side gate,

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 2>smashes through her bedroom window and stabs her viciously. Twenty

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 2>three times we rallied for an appeal. The first time

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 2>didn't get anywhere with that. We rallied again, insisting on

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 2>an appeal. Still didn't get anywhere with that. Once these

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 2>decisions are made, they're made. I have not met and

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 2>I've met hundreds of people I'm not exaggerating here from

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 2>the cemetery and just around the community. Not one community

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 2>member has ever said to me that they didn't believe

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 2>he wouldn't get life. They were convinced he'd get life.

0:13:54.520 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 2>The fact that the courts, the judges, everything they tell

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 2>us through the Sentencing Act, that everything they do they

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:07.200
<v Speaker 2>do in the interest of the community, with community expectations

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 2>in mind. It's a load of rubbish. And this is

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 2>what I call gas lighting. They want to convince us

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 2>that we want what they offer, and we don't.

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I understand where you're coming from. And in the numerous

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>discussions we've had the issue of life sentencing for murder

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>across the board that you raised, and I said, I'm

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>not an advocate for it, and I explain, explain my

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>way that each case needs to be, in my view,

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>judged on the circumstances of the case on its own

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>own merits. But what I also did say to you,

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and I want to put this out and with the

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>research I've done on the lead up to the murder,

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I have absolutely no doubt. Not that my opinion counts

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>for anything. You've got more of a right of an

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>opinion that being the mother of a the young lady.

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>But I believe this person should get life imprisonment. I

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>am campaign and I an advocate for rehabilitation if possible.

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>But this to me is and I bear in his

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>mind there was a homicide detective for a long time.

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>This is the worst type of crime. This was premeditated.

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>There was red flag's steps the whole way that he

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 1>could have walked away from it, and he continued on.

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>And I know there was a lot of discussion about

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>mental health, and you know it was he impaired at

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the time of committing committing the offense. Well, he had

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>enough now to know what he did was wrong because

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>he went to the police. He also discarded the phone

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that he was stalking and harassing your daughter on, discarded

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the phone before he went to the police, and then

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>had selective memory about what happened when he went to

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the place. So, Aggie, what I'm saying, what I'm saying

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to you is I support your anger on this. I

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>can understand it. And this is coming from a person

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't believe every murderer should get a life sentence.

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>But I for this one. If it's Judge Onett's merits

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>for the life of me, I can't see.

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Gary. I'm still always going to continue to you know,

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 2>We're going to have differences of opinion where I'm referring

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 2>to murder murder when there is a question on whether

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 2>something deserves a life sentence or not. Maybe when we're

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 2>considering manslaughter. But murder is murder. Murder is the intentional

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 2>killing of a human being. And so to me, the

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 2>person they killed does not get a second chance. Let's

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 2>was twenty three. I will never understand or agree that

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 2>any murderer deserves a second chance. And we see, we

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 2>have seen it for years, time and time again, murderers

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 2>that are parolled only to commit murder again. I mean

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 2>me personally, I'd be locking up those the parole board,

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 2>the people who made decisions at the parole board, because

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 2>this is not how we should have to No family

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 2>should have to have their loved one murdered by someone

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 2>who had previously murdered because we have a system that

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 2>continues to insist that we rehabilitate them and give them

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 2>a second chance, and we've seen rehabilitation doesn't always work.

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I look at it from the perspective of what was

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>the lead up to this case, what was behind this case.

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>This was just some beast as you call him, and

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that sits comfortable with me, infatuated with a young woman

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and just stalked and harassed repeatedly, was given warnings, was

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:57.400
<v Speaker 1>brushed off politely, not humiliated. There wasn't a relationship. They

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:03.120
<v Speaker 1>virtually didn't know each other. Just became obsessed. And when

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>he gets in trouble, when orders were taken out and

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 1>he breached those orders, and then that three and a

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>half page letter, it's almost like she did him wrong

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and it was the revenge the preparation for it.

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 2>So it was absolute revenge. It was payback. It was

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 2>didn't you didn't listen to me dropping the intervention order.

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 2>You didn't listen to me. This is what I'm going

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 2>to do you know at the end of the day.

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 2>I know it's always been reported that the night that's

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Less uploaded that photo. Let's just remember he bought the

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 2>hammer a knife in August, just after he'd been arrested

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 2>and released. He murdered Celeste in November. You know it

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 2>had to take I suppose what can we call it,

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 2>some courage to see through his plan. The nights uploaded

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:53.719
<v Speaker 2>that photo was simply the when. It was, not the

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 2>why it was the when. This was pure revenge payback,

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:01.439
<v Speaker 2>and that is exact exactly how the courts should have

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 2>treated it.

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you for what it counts. I agree

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>with you. If this isn't in the category of the

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 1>worst type of murder, I don't know what else you

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>need to add to it. So what we want to

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 1>talk about is, Okay, this has happened. We'll talk about

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the lead up to it, but we'll also talk about

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>what's happened after it. Has any lessons been learned? And

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I know you've been pushing and advocating for an inquest

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to be heard in relation to this where they can

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>look at could have this death been prevented? Can you

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>tell me what's happened on that front in regards to

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>your efforts to get an inquest.

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 2>So first I just want to correct something here. I've

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 2>been pushing for an inquest because five and a half

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 2>years later it still hasn't taken place. But I was

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:53.919
<v Speaker 2>never the one who I didn't even know what a

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 2>coronial inquest was when this happened. I was told from

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 2>day one there would be a coronial inquest, and I

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 2>was told that by the Attorney General I met at

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 2>the time with the Secretary of the Department of Justice.

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 2>Because obviously when I met with these people, I wanted answers,

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 2>and I was told that I would get those answers

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 2>after the coronial inquest. I was told those very same

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 2>words by the police Commissioner at the time when I

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 2>was introduced to him and his deputy. Again, I went

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:29.680
<v Speaker 2>in there not to meet these people. I wanted answers.

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 2>How did this happen? Why did you allow it to happen?

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Because I don't know. When you're introduced to the police

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 2>commissioner and deputy commissioner, you don't know what they know

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 2>about the local police station or how everything unfolded. And

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 2>again I was met with condolences and apologies and told

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 2>that an internal investigation had already begun and that whilst

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 2>they understood I wanted answers, they wouldn't be able to

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 2>give me anything until after the coronial inquest. So this

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:01.439
<v Speaker 2>was something I was told from the get go. But

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 2>five and a half years later, there's still no inquest.

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:09.679
<v Speaker 1>So the inquest, the thought of an inquest, and I

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>take on board what you're saying there. You didn't understand

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the system. The thought was put in your head by

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>those people, the people in authority that will give you

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>answers after the inquest, And here we are five and

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 1>a half years later and there's still no inquest.

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 2>No inquest. In fact, the commissioner's words at the time

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 2>were that although he understood, he said, Aggie, I understand

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 2>and realize that this might not give you any solace,

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 2>but a coronial inquest will make findings and it'll teach

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:43.959
<v Speaker 2>us what to do better next time. You know, I

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:48.400
<v Speaker 2>did my research. I understood what the coronial inquest intends

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 2>to do, what it's going to look at the system failures.

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:56.679
<v Speaker 2>How could this be prevented? So, given the significance of

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 2>an inquest and why it's done, why hasn't it been done.

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:05.479
<v Speaker 2>In fact, over the last five and a half years,

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 2>what's been done differently by Victoria police? Absolutely nothing. Intervention

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 2>orders are still being breached. Women are still being murdered. Okay,

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 2>we haven't heard murders in the context of say Celeste

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 2>where she did not she wasn't intimately involved with this person,

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 2>didn't really know him. The ones we hear about domestic

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:35.160
<v Speaker 2>violence murders just as important. Intervention orders in place breached.

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:37.919
<v Speaker 2>Nothing's been done different.

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:41.360
<v Speaker 1>It's concerning, isn't it. Very You said you've done research,

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and I know in speaking to you you've got your

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 1>head round so many different aspects. The inquest is determined

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 1>cause and nature of death. Well, that's been established through

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 1>the criminal courts. But could that death be prevented? And

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that's what you were hoping to get from the inquest?

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, absolutely been prevented. What could the police have done differently?

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 2>There's so many things that could have been done differently,

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 2>but we want, we want the current to make those findings.

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Have you been given a date for the inquest yet?

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:14.360
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the stalking aspect of the offense. I've

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>always had a concern about stalking. I think that it's

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>a very worrying, red flag type of offense. If someone's

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 1>stalking someone that there's a real concerns. In my experience

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 1>in the police, I don't think or police fully accept

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that or fully understand it. I don't think the courts

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>understand it as well, and the politicians don't understand it.

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>One of the campaigns that you've been pushing through is

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>about getting more understanding of the offense and nature of

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 1>stalking and make sure that police respond to it in

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 1>an appropriate way. Can you tell me about your thoughts

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and efforts in that regards well.

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Again, when this happened, the Attorney General at the time

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 2>asked the Victorian Law Reform Commission to do an inquiry

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 2>into stalking the laws around it, as well as the

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:20.919
<v Speaker 2>laws or legislation around the Personal Safety Intervention Order. That

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 2>inquiry was done, it took eighteen months. It came up

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:30.639
<v Speaker 2>with forty five recommendations. There were two reports, an interim

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 2>report and then a final report. The report was recommendations

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 2>specific for Victoria Police in which it made I think

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 2>it was nine recommendations which form part of the forty five.

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:53.199
<v Speaker 2>So you know, going back to politicians don't understand it,

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 2>police don't don't understand it, but an inquiry was done

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 2>and it's allowed them to know where legislation is lacking,

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 2>what police could be doing differently. Part of those recommendations

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 2>makes reference to what they refer to as SASH, which

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 2>the former Attorney General in Victoria decided through a sixty

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 2>minutes interview that was done just after that Beast was

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:31.439
<v Speaker 2>sentenced to say that Victoria police had responded appropriately to

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 2>Celesta's murder by trialing the SASH pilot, which at that

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 2>point she still couldn't say where it was at. They've

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 2>trialed it, we know nothing else. The SASH pilot is basically,

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 2>let's call it a screening tool. It's a questionnaire among

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 2>other things that they will delve into, but it's a

0:25:56.640 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 2>questionnaire that allows police to categorize the level of risk

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 2>that an offender poses, a stalker poses, and depending on

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 2>that level of risk, they'll categorize him low, medium or

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 2>high risk. When I was taken through the pilot and

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.239
<v Speaker 2>what it meant, that's as far as they got at

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 2>the time. This was at the end of this was

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 2>December of twenty twenty two. They still had to do

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Stage two and Stage three and some sort of evaluation

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:31.479
<v Speaker 2>which I was supposed to be kept informed with never happened.

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 2>I have been following up on that every six months.

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 2>Still know nothing. But you know, when I had this

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 2>meeting with the Assistant commissioner that was spearheading that pilot,

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 2>my question at the end of the meeting was very,

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 2>very simple, when you've categorized that the offender poses a

0:26:54.480 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 2>high risk, what do you do then? Now at that

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 2>point there was no answer because they hadn't gotten that far. Honestly,

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:12.160
<v Speaker 2>this is not rocket science to anybody. Clearly, my statement

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 2>was to the point, well, in my opinion, you're telling

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:20.959
<v Speaker 2>me that this has been done to prevent what happened

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:25.199
<v Speaker 2>to Celeste from happening again, and in my opinion, you

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 2>will not prevent that same scenario. You will not prevent

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 2>another death if you do not detain or detect. Either

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 2>you're going to keep the offender, the high risk offender,

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 2>in remand until he is before the courts, or you're

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 2>going to detect through whether it's an ankle bracelet or

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 2>some other advice device, but through electronic monitoring that has

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 2>been dismissed all together. Our premier here in Victoria in

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four announced that electronic monitoring would not be implemented.

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 2>She did state her reasons. Her reasons were it would

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 2>give women a false sense of security.

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I've read the judges summary in the sentencing for this matter,

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and I broke down some points and I just want

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to read those points out, and there's a lot of them.

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 1>But I want people to listen to specifically what we're

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 1>talking about, what you and your daughter experienced in the

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>lead up to this, and when they do look at

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>how many red flags they were, how many indicators there

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>were that something bad was going to happen. Seiko was

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>employed with in April twenty eighteen. Let's listen to the

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>dates too, how long this went on for. In twenty nineteen,

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>so Less became his team leader. June twenty nineteen, Saiko's

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>employment was terminated. Celeste was tasked with escorting him from

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the premises. As Sache was leaving, he thanked Celeste for

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>her kindness without encouragement, he kissed her on the cheek

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>as you talked about the start of the podcast. Three

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>days later, after he left, he tracked down various social

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>media accounts held by Celeste, including Instagram accounts. Again direct

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>messaging her on Instagram declaring his feelings for her, which

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>he politely declined and told him she was not interested.

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>So there is a person that a very distant association

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 1>with a person and being told that your interest in

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>me is not appreciated or not reciprocated. That should be

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a warning sign enough to tell someone to stay away.

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 1>He continued to message her until she blocked him on Instagram.

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 1>A few weeks later, he created a second Instagram account

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and again resumed messaging Celeste again warning signs red flags.

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Told you're not interested, then star So surreptitiously change his

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:08.479
<v Speaker 1>addresses so he can get in contact again. Celeste did

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>not accept Sacho as a follower, but was able to

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>continue to view his messages. Occasionally, Celeste would respond and

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>request Saka cease his communications again understandable. What do you

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>do when someone keeps repeatedly reaching out to you? No,

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not interested, to stay away from me. He'd create

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>new accounts after this, and then you Her mother asked

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 1>him to stop contacting around the thirty first of December

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen, sent a series of sexually explicit and derogatory messages.

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Celeste began to fear for a safety was encouraged to

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>report the matter to police and also reported it to

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 1>her employer. Celeste had seen him sitting in his car

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 1>outside of her work observing her car. I mean red

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 1>flag warning concerns is not normal behavior and it should

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>be noted. Around this time, or I think it was

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>on the third of February twenty twenty, you and Celeste

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>went to the police station and reported the matter, and

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>this wasn't in the judges comments because the judge left

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 1>this out of the comments, But in my conversation with you,

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>it fits into the timeline. But nothing was done or

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:27.959
<v Speaker 1>recorded when you went in and explained this to police

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>at this point in time.

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't in the judges comments because it wasn't in

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 2>the opening summary from the prosecution, because it was that

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 2>first time into the police station was never recorded.

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell me what happened and why it wasn't recorded.

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 2>I have no idea, that's part I suppose of what

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 2>the Coronial Inquest should be investigating.

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>So were you at the police station when you went

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>in on this time or it was a Celeste.

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 2>We did all of it together. We went to the

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 2>police station together. The first time we went to the

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 2>police station together. The second time, which was in July,

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 2>we went to the magistrates caught together, both in July

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 2>and again in August. She always did it all with me.

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So when you went in there on the third

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 1>of February twenty twenty, tell us what happened, and why

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 1>did you go in there, and what was the purpose

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of going in there, and what happened when you got

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>in there.

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 2>We went in there because the messages from him had

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 2>been going on for six months, and at this point

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 2>they were sounding to me, they sounded quite They started

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 2>to sound angry, and so I said to Celeste, look

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 2>because she just wanted to ignore him for a while.

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 2>She just thought he'd go away, he'll get bored. But

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't working. And so because I felt that he

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 2>sounded angry, I said, well, was sweety, We've got to

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 2>go in But also the last message he sent, which

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 2>you stated he sent it, it was the thirty first

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 2>of December. I mean, this is New Ye's Eve. She

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 2>didn't see that message until that third of February. So

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 2>that morning was when she's telling me about it, because

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 2>she wasn't always looking at her Instagram messages, and it

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 2>was such a vulgar message. I just so yes, I

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 2>replied to that message. I was not as sweet as Celeste.

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Seleste always used please to stop contacting her. Mine was

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 2>very direct, capital letters, telling him to stay the hell

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 2>away from my daughter and that we were going to

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 2>the police. Yeah, this is a person that comes back

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 2>with a question mark, and you know another message to Celeste. Honestly,

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 2>your mother, we went to the police, tried to show

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 2>this particular message. This is a disgusting message. He just

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 2>looked at Celess and said, look, now, there's nothing we

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 2>can do about it. She could have say, Mom, they're

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 2>not going to do and I'm insisting getting the car,

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 2>we're going to the police. So I didn't even know

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 2>what to say to her. Try telling a tw three

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 2>year old to get off social media.

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Could I just break that down a little bit more? So,

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you're telling me you've gone into the police station a

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:14.400
<v Speaker 1>mother and a daughter, So you know you've got to

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:16.760
<v Speaker 1>form an opinion when someone walks into a police station.

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:19.839
<v Speaker 1>He's a mother and a daughter here both reporting. It's

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 1>not someone that's come in making up allegations. You've got

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:27.439
<v Speaker 1>the actual communications there. You're trying to show police you're

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 1>concerned enough to go to the police station. This is

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:33.359
<v Speaker 1>a person that's not a relationship. It's not love Gode Sow,

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>which is dangerous enough as it is. This is someone

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 1>that's shown repeatedly he's obsessed with your daughter, and you've

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 1>gone into the police station exactly.

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 2>And can I just add to that that before we

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 2>actually went to the police station, I called the police station,

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 2>explained what was happening over the phone, and that officer

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 2>that I was speaking to, which obviously was someone else,

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:59.319
<v Speaker 2>said if you're concerned about anything, you should come in

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 2>and report it, which is why I said, so lest

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 2>we're going, and we went in. Yeah, there was nothing

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 2>they could do about it. In fact, he said a

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 2>crime hasn't been committed, to which you can imagine My

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:13.880
<v Speaker 2>instant reply was, so we have to wait for the

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 2>crime to be committed. And we walked out quite I

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 2>felt completely helpless. So just prior to appearing in court,

0:35:26.640 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 2>the prosecution got us to go in and sit down

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:31.759
<v Speaker 2>with them because they had to take us through that

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:35.360
<v Speaker 2>opening statement. And when they were reading that out, I

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:38.239
<v Speaker 2>remember interrupting and saying, because they've gone straight to the

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 2>July report at the police station, I said, no, no,

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:45.840
<v Speaker 2>you've forgotten February, and they've looked at me and said, Aggie,

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:50.959
<v Speaker 2>we haven't forgotten. It was never recorded, so we can't

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 2>have it. In the opening summary. I was livid and

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 2>I remember saying, but what do you mean?

0:35:57.760 --> 0:36:00.759
<v Speaker 1>And on that what concerns me. I don't think there's

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 1>an excuse if someone comes in and reports that, that

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:06.720
<v Speaker 1>is a warning sign to me. Someone's obsessed with someone

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 1>enough that they're sending these messages repeatedly, changing the address

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:13.880
<v Speaker 1>so they can stay in contact, and the warning signs

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 1>are there. Even if a criminal offense couldn't be established,

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you would take the details down in cases escalated, in

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 1>case it's reported again. Maybe he's doing it to other women.

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 1>There's so many things that could be done. I'm choosing

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 1>my words carefully here, but it infuriates me because it

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:32.320
<v Speaker 1>would be so easy for me, if I'm a police

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 1>officer dismiss you and your daughter. If you walked into

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the police station, you'd be seeing there thinking well, I've

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 1>come to the police, so police know what to do,

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and I could just bullshit like that, and you'd walk

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:45.280
<v Speaker 1>out of the police station and think, oh, well, there's

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 1>nothing that can be done. But my anger and frustration

0:36:50.160 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that indicators, red flags are missed in

0:36:54.080 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 1>situations like that. That is concerning to me.

0:36:57.760 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Very concerning. This is what I mean when I said

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:06.239
<v Speaker 2>at the start, very angry, because I absolutely believe that

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Celester's murder was preventable. What I mean by that is

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:20.320
<v Speaker 2>you're dealing with an individual who has within those first

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 2>six months turned what must have been an infatuation turning

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 2>into an obsession, right because there are messages that come

0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 2>at a later stage where he states that this is

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:41.759
<v Speaker 2>becoming unhealthy for him because she's already thinks about He

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:44.240
<v Speaker 2>says he can't eat, he can't sleep, he can't function,

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:47.360
<v Speaker 2>he can't look for work. So you know it gets

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 2>to an obsession. And so what I'm saying is if

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:54.120
<v Speaker 2>it had been taken seriously the first time, and you've

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:57.799
<v Speaker 2>got this individual coming in, having a discussion with them,

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 2>letting them know what the repercussions will be offering. I've

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 2>heard a lot about these men's behavioral program who are

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:11.880
<v Speaker 2>they for because they only seem to be for the

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 2>rehabilitation purpose before they release them from prison. How about

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:20.840
<v Speaker 2>we start trialing those before they end up in prison.

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 2>That's what preventative measures are. Why do we only have

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:30.839
<v Speaker 2>them there as something to use to rehabilitate them so

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 2>that they don't re offend. Why aren't we using these

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 2>same programs to fix what's obviously quite not right with them.

0:38:39.120 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 2>So I absolutely believe that if they if they had

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 2>done things differently, maybe, just maybe he would have taken

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:53.840
<v Speaker 2>it more. He would have been He can't deny that

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 2>he has been told what the repercussions will be, what

0:38:57.440 --> 0:39:03.000
<v Speaker 2>the consequences we will be. He absolutely should accept help.

0:39:03.800 --> 0:39:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Does he recognize he needs help? Does he need to

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:10.600
<v Speaker 2>be told by professionals that he needs help? But what

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying is it could have de escalated the situation

0:39:14.880 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 2>as opposed to what ended up happening.

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think you made a valiant point that he's

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 1>infatuated and that led to becoming obsessed, and you could

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 1>see the build up and it's like you're seeing murder

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:30.799
<v Speaker 1>here in slow motion. I wanted to raise the fact

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:33.839
<v Speaker 1>that you went in there, and I believe that's unforgivable

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:36.719
<v Speaker 1>and this if change needs to be done, this is

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the type of change that needs to be done. If

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 1>someone comes in and reports that to a police station.

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:45.360
<v Speaker 1>There should be an expectation that records have made of

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that not fobbed off. On the first of July twenty twenty,

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:54.239
<v Speaker 1>your game went to the police station and reported the

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:57.799
<v Speaker 1>continued stalking. You've got a different response in so this

0:39:57.840 --> 0:40:01.400
<v Speaker 1>is five months later. What happened there, Well.

0:40:01.200 --> 0:40:06.399
<v Speaker 2>The response there gave us hope because that turned out

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 2>to be leading constable. His reaction was the complete opposite.

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 2>He was shocked to see the sexually explicit message, and

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 2>the first thing that came out of his mouth was

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:22.799
<v Speaker 2>have you been here before, which of course led to

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 2>me saying yes, absolutely, six months ago. Are you saying

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:32.080
<v Speaker 2>something should have been done then? And his reply to

0:40:32.160 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 2>that was, I'm just never going to forget it. Let's

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 2>just say some of us do our job better than others.

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:42.239
<v Speaker 2>And then he asked us to go into a room

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:44.400
<v Speaker 2>where we were there for a couple of hours because

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:49.360
<v Speaker 2>he took photos of every single message on Celesti's phone,

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 2>and there was That was probably especially because to take

0:40:54.200 --> 0:40:57.240
<v Speaker 2>the screenshots. Sometimes when you take the screenshots, it doesn't

0:40:57.280 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 2>capture the whole message. So you know, there was over

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 2>I've got two hundred and twenty pages because they were

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:05.480
<v Speaker 2>all printed as well to take it at the magistrate's court,

0:41:07.320 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 2>So a completely different response.

0:41:09.400 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Can I just say there because I've criticized police in

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the previous encounter you had with police, But yes, he's

0:41:16.040 --> 0:41:19.400
<v Speaker 1>quite quite right, and that's the difference. But it shouldn't

0:41:19.440 --> 0:41:22.759
<v Speaker 1>depend which officer or who's in the police station at

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the time you come to report. These are the things

0:41:24.800 --> 0:41:26.759
<v Speaker 1>that if there wasn't in quest, or if there was

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 1>an internal investigation, these are the things that need to

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 1>be tightened up that there is a standard response if

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:36.160
<v Speaker 1>someone comes in and reports a situation of the nature

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that you and Celeste reported.

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:41.760
<v Speaker 2>That is what a coronial inquest should be looking into.

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:44.719
<v Speaker 1>So that was the first of July. You went in

0:41:44.760 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and reported, and you had the police officer taking the

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:50.560
<v Speaker 1>details at that stage, and again this is from the

0:41:50.640 --> 0:41:54.840
<v Speaker 1>judge's comments. At that stage, Seyko's behavior had been ongoing

0:41:54.920 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 1>for twelve months when it was reported Celeste produced all

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 1>the messages to police, so that's twelve months. On the

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:06.440
<v Speaker 1>third of July, you attended a magistrate's court and took

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:11.719
<v Speaker 1>out a personal safety intervention order at PSIO. On the

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:16.160
<v Speaker 1>eighth of the seventh, twenty twenty, that order was served

0:42:16.160 --> 0:42:20.239
<v Speaker 1>on him. The harassment stopped for a while. On the

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:23.839
<v Speaker 1>fourth of August, Celest attended the magistrates court for an

0:42:23.840 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 1>introm order to be made final.

0:42:25.800 --> 0:42:29.360
<v Speaker 2>So Celesta know Yep Yep and.

0:42:30.640 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Seiko refused to consent to the final orders, and a

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:36.759
<v Speaker 1>hearing was sent set down for the nine ninth of

0:42:36.800 --> 0:42:40.839
<v Speaker 1>March twenty twenty one. So we're going from August. He's

0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:43.040
<v Speaker 1>not consenting to the orders, and the orders I would

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:46.440
<v Speaker 1>imagine would be not to communicate harass or the standard

0:42:46.520 --> 0:42:50.480
<v Speaker 1>type of features in the order. He wouldn't consent to it.

0:42:50.600 --> 0:42:54.160
<v Speaker 1>So a hearing was set down so he could contest.

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:55.040
<v Speaker 1>What's in there?

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:58.759
<v Speaker 2>We should add that the day he contested, however, the

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:02.920
<v Speaker 2>magistrate's courts still put in place an intram order with

0:43:03.120 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 2>the same conditions that a final order would have.

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Had, okay, and that carries through until the hearing until March.

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:16.280
<v Speaker 1>On the tenth of August twenty twenty, Sekah was arrested

0:43:16.280 --> 0:43:20.319
<v Speaker 1>and interviewed at the police station for repeated messages. He

0:43:20.480 --> 0:43:25.400
<v Speaker 1>was released pending further investigations. The eleventh of August, purchased

0:43:25.640 --> 0:43:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the murder weapon. Now you've indicated I've just pulled that

0:43:29.600 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 1>out from the summary. I'm not making whether he knew

0:43:33.600 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it was the murder weapon, but that's the date he

0:43:36.719 --> 0:43:40.000
<v Speaker 1>purchased the weapon that we used to murder Celeste.

0:43:39.480 --> 0:43:41.840
<v Speaker 2>What you referred to as the date just prior to

0:43:41.880 --> 0:43:43.759
<v Speaker 2>that when you said on the tenth of August he

0:43:43.920 --> 0:43:46.360
<v Speaker 2>was arrested. That was for breaching the interventional.

0:43:46.440 --> 0:43:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and he was interviewed at the police station, released,

0:43:49.640 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and the next day he just happened to buy this

0:43:52.200 --> 0:43:55.360
<v Speaker 1>knife and a hammer, and the hammer, the hammer that

0:43:55.400 --> 0:43:56.000
<v Speaker 1>he used to.

0:43:56.160 --> 0:43:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Just smash into Celesta's bedroom window.

0:43:58.040 --> 0:44:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so let's workplace put in a safety plan escorting

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:06.600
<v Speaker 1>her to a car. So this is how concerned concerning

0:44:06.640 --> 0:44:07.600
<v Speaker 1>it is at this stage.

0:44:07.640 --> 0:44:11.279
<v Speaker 2>So even the safety plans were put in place, you know,

0:44:11.480 --> 0:44:17.480
<v Speaker 2>from earlier on, because obviously I was very concerned, and

0:44:17.560 --> 0:44:22.560
<v Speaker 2>so I wanted to I was very worried about Celeste

0:44:22.640 --> 0:44:27.000
<v Speaker 2>leaving work, and he knew where she worked, so we

0:44:27.040 --> 0:44:29.879
<v Speaker 2>didn't need him finding out where we lived. So I

0:44:29.960 --> 0:44:33.840
<v Speaker 2>wanted to start, you know, going to Celestia's place before

0:44:33.880 --> 0:44:37.360
<v Speaker 2>she finished work every day and then follow her home

0:44:37.880 --> 0:44:41.080
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that nobody was following her. But she

0:44:41.239 --> 0:44:44.200
<v Speaker 2>kept insisting no, Mom, I'm fine, but I'll keep an

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:47.280
<v Speaker 2>eye on things. There's someone walking me to the car

0:44:47.880 --> 0:44:52.200
<v Speaker 2>every night, and I know that that was happening. They

0:44:52.239 --> 0:44:56.120
<v Speaker 2>had a separate staff car park this building, and she

0:44:56.320 --> 0:44:59.120
<v Speaker 2>was being walked to the car park to the car

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:02.520
<v Speaker 2>every night, another team leader. So that was that was

0:45:02.560 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 2>already happening from the start.

0:45:06.120 --> 0:45:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, On the fifteenth of August twenty twenty, Saiko contraverting

0:45:11.200 --> 0:45:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the introm psio, sending her a three and a half

0:45:14.400 --> 0:45:17.000
<v Speaker 1>page letter. That's the letter that you've referred to. That

0:45:17.120 --> 0:45:19.719
<v Speaker 1>was on the fifteenth of August. On the twenty fifth

0:45:19.800 --> 0:45:23.239
<v Speaker 1>of August twenty twenty, he was interviewed by police regarding

0:45:23.280 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 1>his contravention of the intram order and attempting to pervert

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the course of justice. I'm assuming the perverter course of

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:33.520
<v Speaker 1>justice is because he was telling her to drop the

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:37.399
<v Speaker 1>drop the order exactly. To me, that's concerning. So here

0:45:37.600 --> 0:45:40.320
<v Speaker 1>is it's been the core, that's been to the police,

0:45:40.320 --> 0:45:42.400
<v Speaker 1>it's been to court, the orders are in place, and

0:45:42.400 --> 0:45:46.279
<v Speaker 1>he's still sending three and a half page page letter.

0:45:46.360 --> 0:45:49.240
<v Speaker 1>So he's not learning from this. He is not learning

0:45:49.280 --> 0:45:53.160
<v Speaker 1>from it. Interviewed by police, so he wasn't wasn't charged.

0:45:53.320 --> 0:45:56.480
<v Speaker 1>He did not attempt any further contact after that interview.

0:45:57.120 --> 0:46:01.160
<v Speaker 1>On the sixth of September, the intram order was on

0:46:01.239 --> 0:46:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Sako by post to appear at the magistrates Court on

0:46:04.560 --> 0:46:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the fifteenth of February twenty twenty one. Can I just

0:46:08.200 --> 0:46:12.000
<v Speaker 1>break that down because that concerns me. So you've got

0:46:12.000 --> 0:46:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the build up that we've talked about, You've attending the

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:19.719
<v Speaker 1>police station twice. On the second time the PSIO has

0:46:19.760 --> 0:46:23.200
<v Speaker 1>been taken out, it's appeared at court. He wants to

0:46:23.840 --> 0:46:28.640
<v Speaker 1>contest the conditions in there. But an intramor that's been there.

0:46:29.480 --> 0:46:34.000
<v Speaker 1>He's then breached that intram order, been interviewed by police

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and when it was served on him, it was served

0:46:38.120 --> 0:46:40.880
<v Speaker 1>by post to appear at the magistrate's court on the

0:46:40.920 --> 0:46:45.319
<v Speaker 1>fifteenth of February. I think there's and I can't blame

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:50.520
<v Speaker 1>an individual officer here, but my instinct here is there's

0:46:50.760 --> 0:46:54.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously a record that's building up here now like a

0:46:54.080 --> 0:46:59.080
<v Speaker 1>pattern of behavior. One would think that instead of serving

0:46:59.120 --> 0:47:01.839
<v Speaker 1>it by post, go knock on the door. You would

0:47:01.880 --> 0:47:05.640
<v Speaker 1>knock on the door and have a very harsh conversation, wouldn't.

0:47:05.280 --> 0:47:08.600
<v Speaker 2>The perpetrator just Tony Ever, receiving anything by post.

0:47:08.840 --> 0:47:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, it doesn't have the impact of two police officers

0:47:12.000 --> 0:47:15.760
<v Speaker 1>knocking on the door, standing there and warning and making

0:47:15.800 --> 0:47:18.200
<v Speaker 1>it very clear that this type of behavior is not

0:47:18.239 --> 0:47:22.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be tolerated. Does it change things? I don't know,

0:47:22.880 --> 0:47:25.520
<v Speaker 1>but I do know you'd have a better chance of

0:47:25.880 --> 0:47:29.480
<v Speaker 1>changing things if you served it in person and explained

0:47:29.719 --> 0:47:34.239
<v Speaker 1>how serious this was getting. On the eleventh of November,

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:37.800
<v Speaker 1>he emailed the officer in charge of the case asking

0:47:37.880 --> 0:47:40.640
<v Speaker 1>for electronic copies of each brief so it's still in

0:47:40.680 --> 0:47:44.440
<v Speaker 1>his mind. Eleventh of November, and then the sixteenth of

0:47:44.480 --> 0:47:49.759
<v Speaker 1>November was the night that Celeste was murdered. That's the

0:47:49.800 --> 0:47:52.880
<v Speaker 1>build up for it. There's so many things that concern me,

0:47:52.960 --> 0:47:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and that and now that people are listening to this,

0:47:57.040 --> 0:48:01.279
<v Speaker 1>understand what you and your daughter were going through. Where

0:48:01.280 --> 0:48:03.120
<v Speaker 1>do you think it should have been stopped.

0:48:03.880 --> 0:48:08.440
<v Speaker 2>It should have been stopped from that first visit. From

0:48:08.600 --> 0:48:13.040
<v Speaker 2>the first visit it wasn't. And again I will go

0:48:13.360 --> 0:48:17.840
<v Speaker 2>back to now let's go to the leading constable that

0:48:18.040 --> 0:48:23.680
<v Speaker 2>did take it seriously once he's then breached the intervention order.

0:48:24.560 --> 0:48:28.040
<v Speaker 2>And remember, because of what I was reading in that

0:48:28.120 --> 0:48:32.080
<v Speaker 2>three and a half page letter, I was terrified. I

0:48:32.160 --> 0:48:36.919
<v Speaker 2>felt that there would be retaliation for not dropping this order.

0:48:37.000 --> 0:48:40.120
<v Speaker 2>So I picked up the phone. Even though Celeste didn't

0:48:40.120 --> 0:48:41.759
<v Speaker 2>want to hear me because she'd already met with the

0:48:41.800 --> 0:48:45.200
<v Speaker 2>constable who'd convinced her not to drop the intervention order.

0:48:45.920 --> 0:48:48.560
<v Speaker 2>I picked up the phone to say to him, you

0:48:48.600 --> 0:48:51.640
<v Speaker 2>know what, why don't we just drop this intervention order?

0:48:51.680 --> 0:48:54.000
<v Speaker 2>And he didn't want to hear about and I continued

0:48:54.120 --> 0:48:56.480
<v Speaker 2>I was trying to speak above him, to say, just

0:48:57.000 --> 0:48:59.920
<v Speaker 2>he clearly lives at home, that was understood by the letter.

0:49:00.360 --> 0:49:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Call him in, call him in with his family, which

0:49:02.600 --> 0:49:05.839
<v Speaker 2>will have a meeting. He just needs to get through

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:07.680
<v Speaker 2>his head. He needs to stay away. We don't want

0:49:07.719 --> 0:49:09.520
<v Speaker 2>to ruin his life because he's put a lot in

0:49:09.560 --> 0:49:12.400
<v Speaker 2>this letter about how it's going to destroy him. He

0:49:12.440 --> 0:49:14.480
<v Speaker 2>won't be able to look after his sick mother and

0:49:15.040 --> 0:49:19.160
<v Speaker 2>whatever he's carrying on about. But the Constable is absolutely

0:49:19.239 --> 0:49:22.360
<v Speaker 2>insisting that we do not drop this intervention order. And

0:49:22.400 --> 0:49:25.080
<v Speaker 2>the more I'm trying to get him to do things

0:49:25.120 --> 0:49:27.960
<v Speaker 2>my way there, the more insistent he is, to the

0:49:27.960 --> 0:49:30.759
<v Speaker 2>point that he says, if Celeste drops this intervention order,

0:49:30.840 --> 0:49:34.400
<v Speaker 2>we won't be able to protect it. He literally made

0:49:34.400 --> 0:49:40.600
<v Speaker 2>me freeze with those words, because it made me feel

0:49:40.640 --> 0:49:43.840
<v Speaker 2>like I would be the one putting my daughter in danger.

0:49:45.560 --> 0:49:48.680
<v Speaker 2>So of course at that point I was quick to reply,

0:49:48.800 --> 0:49:52.600
<v Speaker 2>we won't drop anything. But it also puts Celesta and

0:49:52.640 --> 0:49:54.279
<v Speaker 2>I who was right next to me, she could hear

0:49:54.320 --> 0:49:58.000
<v Speaker 2>the conversation I had him on speaker. It also put

0:49:58.080 --> 0:50:00.680
<v Speaker 2>both of us under the impression that they must be

0:50:00.719 --> 0:50:05.799
<v Speaker 2>monitoring him. I was absolutely convinced with those words that

0:50:05.920 --> 0:50:10.799
<v Speaker 2>they must be monitoring his movements. So, you know, to

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:14.400
<v Speaker 2>say to someone whether he had said it to and

0:50:14.440 --> 0:50:17.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure he had said it to Celeste herself, and

0:50:17.640 --> 0:50:21.680
<v Speaker 2>now to me, if Celeste drops this the intervention, we

0:50:21.800 --> 0:50:25.799
<v Speaker 2>won't be able to protect her. That means you have

0:50:25.960 --> 0:50:31.080
<v Speaker 2>something in place that's clearly going to protect her. Well

0:50:31.840 --> 0:50:38.160
<v Speaker 2>they didn't, did they. There was nothing in place. They

0:50:38.160 --> 0:50:43.840
<v Speaker 2>weren't monitoring anything. So again, you know, this goes to

0:50:45.200 --> 0:50:50.960
<v Speaker 2>earlier in the conversation where we're talking about the VLC

0:50:51.160 --> 0:50:56.920
<v Speaker 2>the recommendations, and you know the non recommendation being the

0:50:57.000 --> 0:51:03.319
<v Speaker 2>electronic monitoring. Monitoring would absolutely have prevented what happened that night.

0:51:05.120 --> 0:51:07.480
<v Speaker 2>And there's no one that's going to take that out

0:51:07.520 --> 0:51:08.000
<v Speaker 2>of my head.

0:51:08.160 --> 0:51:11.000
<v Speaker 1>No, Well, I agree with you, and we will talk

0:51:11.000 --> 0:51:15.279
<v Speaker 1>about that in depth with the police saying don't withdraw it.

0:51:15.360 --> 0:51:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I can understand the logic of that. I'm trying to

0:51:18.480 --> 0:51:22.200
<v Speaker 1>be balanced in it, but I certainly can understand your concerns,

0:51:22.360 --> 0:51:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and that would be, yeah, why are we picking the

0:51:25.680 --> 0:51:30.160
<v Speaker 1>fight and when they're saying don't withdraw it because then

0:51:30.200 --> 0:51:34.000
<v Speaker 1>we won't be able to protect I can understand you

0:51:34.080 --> 0:51:37.080
<v Speaker 1>also making the assumption that there must be some sort

0:51:37.080 --> 0:51:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of protection in place, like police are monitoring him, and

0:51:40.000 --> 0:51:40.720
<v Speaker 1>police are going.

0:51:42.200 --> 0:51:44.799
<v Speaker 2>Because if you're going to tell me her mother when

0:51:44.840 --> 0:51:48.759
<v Speaker 2>I am pointing out that I am seen retaliation if

0:51:48.800 --> 0:51:51.840
<v Speaker 2>we don't. At the end of the day, the person

0:51:51.880 --> 0:51:57.560
<v Speaker 2>that was at risk was only Celeste, right, It's not

0:51:57.680 --> 0:52:00.880
<v Speaker 2>the person you're dealing with. My daughter was that risk.

0:52:01.239 --> 0:52:05.880
<v Speaker 1>These are the things that we've got to appreciate, and

0:52:06.040 --> 0:52:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it comes back to not fully appreciating the

0:52:09.600 --> 0:52:14.840
<v Speaker 1>nature of nature of stalking and understanding how dangerous offense

0:52:14.920 --> 0:52:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that is. I've had on a high profile investigation I

0:52:18.719 --> 0:52:21.359
<v Speaker 1>was working on and I was so surprised we came

0:52:21.400 --> 0:52:25.279
<v Speaker 1>across a person of interest that was stalking someone. Horrendous

0:52:25.320 --> 0:52:29.399
<v Speaker 1>case of stalking just an infatuation, obsession, that type of thing,

0:52:29.760 --> 0:52:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and I was surprised by the amount of police that

0:52:32.520 --> 0:52:35.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't think that was a serious red flag in the investigation.

0:52:36.000 --> 0:52:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I was gobsmacked by it. And I've had the benefit

0:52:40.120 --> 0:52:42.360
<v Speaker 1>because I do get a b in my bond about

0:52:42.440 --> 0:52:45.480
<v Speaker 1>stalking that people don't appreciate how serious it is, and

0:52:45.520 --> 0:52:47.560
<v Speaker 1>it's probably because I see the tail end of it

0:52:47.920 --> 0:52:52.080
<v Speaker 1>as a homicide homicide detective. But I had the benefits

0:52:52.120 --> 0:52:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of speaking to Laura Richards on the podcast, and she's

0:52:55.960 --> 0:53:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a world renowned criminal behavior analyst international ecurred on stalking,

0:53:01.160 --> 0:53:04.400
<v Speaker 1>homicide and risk Assessment. She trained with the FBI and

0:53:04.440 --> 0:53:08.359
<v Speaker 1>she also worked for New Scotland yard she developed the

0:53:08.520 --> 0:53:12.120
<v Speaker 1>domestic abuse Stalking on the Base violence which is called DASH,

0:53:12.239 --> 0:53:15.239
<v Speaker 1>which is similar to what you're saying with SASH, which

0:53:15.280 --> 0:53:18.560
<v Speaker 1>is a risk identification, assessment and management model which has

0:53:18.600 --> 0:53:22.160
<v Speaker 1>currently been implemented in the UK. And she also was

0:53:22.200 --> 0:53:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the founder of the world's first national stalking Advocacy service,

0:53:27.040 --> 0:53:30.280
<v Speaker 1>So she knows what she's talking about when she's talking stalking,

0:53:30.920 --> 0:53:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and when I spoke to her, she made a number

0:53:33.560 --> 0:53:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of interesting points about stalking. Firstly, she said that stalking

0:53:37.719 --> 0:53:41.640
<v Speaker 1>is often used in a comedic sense like ah, I'm

0:53:41.640 --> 0:53:44.040
<v Speaker 1>not stalking you and we all laugh and sort of

0:53:44.080 --> 0:53:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the innocent stalker, it's just someone obsessed, And she said

0:53:48.719 --> 0:53:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that gives the wrong connotation of what stalking is. Stalking

0:53:52.040 --> 0:53:55.759
<v Speaker 1>is a very serious predatory behavior. She also made the

0:53:55.800 --> 0:53:59.520
<v Speaker 1>point that in her first five years working with New

0:53:59.560 --> 0:54:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Scotland on stranger rape, murder and abduction cases, she would

0:54:04.160 --> 0:54:08.000
<v Speaker 1>call the majority of the offenders we caught with predatory stalkers.

0:54:08.320 --> 0:54:10.160
<v Speaker 1>So let's break that down. She was working on the

0:54:10.200 --> 0:54:14.120
<v Speaker 1>stranger rape, murder and abduction cases and the majority of

0:54:14.160 --> 0:54:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the offenders caught in that five year period were predatory stalkers.

0:54:18.400 --> 0:54:21.840
<v Speaker 1>She talked about how stalking is often missed by police

0:54:21.880 --> 0:54:26.520
<v Speaker 1>as predatory behavior, but predators are the most dangerous type

0:54:26.520 --> 0:54:29.279
<v Speaker 1>of offenders. So this is the world's expert on it.

0:54:29.480 --> 0:54:33.680
<v Speaker 1>And she talks about murdering slow motion. She talks about

0:54:33.960 --> 0:54:37.759
<v Speaker 1>red flags of the mist and the need to make

0:54:37.840 --> 0:54:41.440
<v Speaker 1>police fully understand how serious stalking is.

0:54:42.160 --> 0:54:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Yes, police don't take I don't believe take stalking seriously.

0:54:48.440 --> 0:54:52.040
<v Speaker 2>In the case of family violence, where you do have

0:54:52.280 --> 0:54:58.200
<v Speaker 2>ex partners that are stalking their wives, girlfriends, what have

0:54:58.360 --> 0:55:03.520
<v Speaker 2>you in Celes case, because you know, that was the

0:55:03.520 --> 0:55:06.759
<v Speaker 2>first question that was asked, are you involved with him

0:55:06.840 --> 0:55:09.040
<v Speaker 2>or something like that, because it was none of that,

0:55:09.640 --> 0:55:12.600
<v Speaker 2>just someone that used to work there. Doesn't even work

0:55:12.680 --> 0:55:15.640
<v Speaker 2>there at this point in time when we're going in

0:55:15.680 --> 0:55:18.880
<v Speaker 2>the first time, so six months after it had been happening.

0:55:19.400 --> 0:55:21.839
<v Speaker 2>He hasn't been working there for six months. But the

0:55:21.840 --> 0:55:24.600
<v Speaker 2>fact that they were never involved in anything, there was

0:55:24.640 --> 0:55:29.120
<v Speaker 2>no relationship, I think that there was reason for that

0:55:29.320 --> 0:55:33.239
<v Speaker 2>police officer to take it even less seriously because it

0:55:33.440 --> 0:55:37.200
<v Speaker 2>was just ignore him. I'm sure he'll go away, even

0:55:37.200 --> 0:55:40.120
<v Speaker 2>though we were saying she has been ignoring him for

0:55:40.239 --> 0:55:41.160
<v Speaker 2>six months.

0:55:41.680 --> 0:55:44.920
<v Speaker 1>You make an interesting point there, Aggie, and I think

0:55:44.920 --> 0:55:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you're probably right, Like we have this height and awareness

0:55:48.520 --> 0:55:52.760
<v Speaker 1>now of domestic violence and stalking for disgruntled ex partners

0:55:52.800 --> 0:55:56.279
<v Speaker 1>and that and this the police officer that dismissed it

0:55:56.480 --> 0:56:00.680
<v Speaker 1>out of hand first up and didn't do their their job.

0:56:01.320 --> 0:56:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because they're not seeing a disgruntled X, right, It's

0:56:05.640 --> 0:56:10.759
<v Speaker 2>like the disgruntled X has reason to be angry at her,

0:56:11.920 --> 0:56:14.919
<v Speaker 2>therefore it makes sense he's stalking her. But like I said,

0:56:15.360 --> 0:56:18.360
<v Speaker 2>they're still not really treating that any differently. But in

0:56:18.400 --> 0:56:19.319
<v Speaker 2>the case where you're not.

0:56:19.719 --> 0:56:25.799
<v Speaker 1>That could be a simple layman's understanding of stalking. Oh well,

0:56:25.840 --> 0:56:30.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not a domestic relationship. But from a police officer's

0:56:30.480 --> 0:56:33.600
<v Speaker 1>point of view, I think it's more scary that someone

0:56:33.680 --> 0:56:37.680
<v Speaker 1>becomes obsessed with someone that they've had literally hardly or

0:56:37.960 --> 0:56:40.440
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with, and they've become obsessed with them.

0:56:40.880 --> 0:56:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it should show if anything, and it's been going

0:56:44.280 --> 0:56:48.080
<v Speaker 2>on for six months at that point, How does six

0:56:48.160 --> 0:56:52.320
<v Speaker 2>months not indicate that they're not going to get bored?

0:56:52.680 --> 0:56:57.719
<v Speaker 2>How does it not indicate that it's become or becoming

0:56:58.400 --> 0:57:03.840
<v Speaker 2>a fixation? How is that not a red flag?

0:57:03.880 --> 0:57:06.520
<v Speaker 1>There? It is a red flag. And that's why I

0:57:06.560 --> 0:57:10.000
<v Speaker 1>hope people listening to this discussion get an understanding of

0:57:10.320 --> 0:57:13.239
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about here and don't dismiss this. And

0:57:14.400 --> 0:57:17.880
<v Speaker 1>police need to understand that, the courts need to understand that,

0:57:17.960 --> 0:57:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the politicians need to understand that the ones that make

0:57:20.560 --> 0:57:24.600
<v Speaker 1>laws need to understand that stalking is a dangerous, dangerous

0:57:24.960 --> 0:57:29.240
<v Speaker 1>crime and if someone is stalking, there's potential for something

0:57:29.440 --> 0:57:32.800
<v Speaker 1>tragic to happen likes happened to celest Well Gary.

0:57:32.880 --> 0:57:38.320
<v Speaker 2>So far, politicians in particular are not understanding it. At all,

0:57:38.520 --> 0:57:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Because when you have a premier who heard from the

0:57:42.600 --> 0:57:47.080
<v Speaker 2>get go and with all the discussions around stalking and

0:57:47.160 --> 0:57:52.120
<v Speaker 2>breaches of intervention orders, regardless of the context family violence

0:57:52.320 --> 0:57:56.800
<v Speaker 2>or not, when you're hearing that those orders are getting breached,

0:57:58.560 --> 0:58:03.520
<v Speaker 2>and you're then saying that electronic monitoring is a no

0:58:04.640 --> 0:58:07.440
<v Speaker 2>because it gives women a false sense of security. But

0:58:07.480 --> 0:58:10.919
<v Speaker 2>then decide to say, the way you're going to make

0:58:11.200 --> 0:58:15.280
<v Speaker 2>women feel more secure is you're going to extend the

0:58:15.360 --> 0:58:18.360
<v Speaker 2>intervention order. That crappy piece of paper that they have

0:58:18.600 --> 0:58:22.680
<v Speaker 2>admitted time and time again is a worthless piece of paper.

0:58:23.040 --> 0:58:26.400
<v Speaker 2>You're going to extend the intervention order for two years.

0:58:26.720 --> 0:58:30.000
<v Speaker 2>That is going to give women a sense of security.

0:58:30.280 --> 0:58:33.880
<v Speaker 2>So what has never made them feel safe, keeping it

0:58:33.920 --> 0:58:38.280
<v Speaker 2>in there for longer, making them feel unsafe for longer

0:58:38.400 --> 0:58:41.440
<v Speaker 2>will give them a sense of security. Make that make sense?

0:58:42.720 --> 0:58:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I can't make it make sense, Aggie. Let's

0:58:47.880 --> 0:58:51.280
<v Speaker 1>have a break now. When we get back, we'll talk

0:58:52.120 --> 0:58:56.040
<v Speaker 1>again in more depth about how your daughter's murder could

0:58:56.040 --> 0:59:00.160
<v Speaker 1>have been prevented, and let's push for what can change.

0:59:00.480 --> 0:59:02.800
<v Speaker 1>If other people aren't going to make changes, let's talk

0:59:02.840 --> 0:59:05.760
<v Speaker 1>about what changes could could be made. So this type

0:59:05.800 --> 0:59:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of thing doesn't happen because I can guarantee it will

0:59:08.000 --> 0:59:08.560
<v Speaker 1>happen again.

0:59:08.840 --> 0:59:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely will happen again. Unfortunately.

0:59:11.440 --> 0:59:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's have that break