WEBVTT - Interview with The SCodfather, completing your team, and players to avoid! | SuperCoach AFL

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:06.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, super Coaches, strap in. Welcome to the Official

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>AFL Supercoach Podcast. You're in and out guide to the

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>greatest game on this big blue Marble week all the

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>planet Earth. That's right, AFL Supercoach. We've got round fourteen

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>in the bag, Round fifteen to preview. We're going to

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>do so with some of the smartest brains on this

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>planet when it comes to super Coach and also me.

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>That's right, I'm your host, James Clements joining me today.

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>We have Al Payton the Guru. What's going on?

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:32.319
<v Speaker 2>Al Ah, I'm feeling really good, James, Supercoach is going well.

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 2>We just talked a little bit Dusty three hundred before

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 2>coming on. Yes, I'm a little bit emotional, but we'll

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 2>push on.

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:39.639
<v Speaker 1>We've also got Patch sitting over there with the long,

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:43.160
<v Speaker 1>luscious locks just flying about in the air. Love this good?

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 3>Ay?

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Has there been calls for endorsements and things after last

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:48.480
<v Speaker 2>week's shore Noel.

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 4>I'd tried to get that. Alex Peace responded to me

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 4>on Twitter and I tried to then try and get

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 4>his hair secrets, and he gave me the exact answer

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 4>I gave everyone else.

0:00:56.560 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>So anyway is the answer he washes in mountain streams like,

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure that's what it is, right.

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, no, My answer was like, what's your secret? And

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 4>I said yes, And I then asked Alice Pearson he

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 4>said yes, which fair play to the man.

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Nice. Well there you go. You some of the greatest

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:15.119
<v Speaker 1>here on the planet and also one of the best

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>super Coach teams. I don't We'll get to that in

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>a second.

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 4>But your here is lovely. What are you talking about.

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm the fun one. We bring on the fandom to

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>talk bubble boys as well. But we have one of

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the other fantastic Supercoach content creator is out there, the

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>godfather Coach of abs Magic ranked what was one hundred

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and two hundred and two.

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 4>I can't calm it down about this interview, and he's

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 4>so good.

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>It is a great chat stick around for that and

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of course this show is probably brought to you by

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the super Coach plus vibes on the super Coach website.

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Fella your live super Coach scores on game day see

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>or the break Evans or you projected scores dominate your

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>buyers and when we got one of those left the Biplanner.

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>You can check out the show nos for a link

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to subscribe. Right, let's get into it. Round fourteen the

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>rap Rap Rap and heroes and villains we saw with

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you patch because I can't actually take, you know, get

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>myself to write down my final score. So how did

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you go?

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 4>So two three eight for me this week? Very happy

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 4>with that. You know, a few people bit further that

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 4>further ahead, but I did still go up in ranks,

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 4>so into the top five hundred or back into the

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 4>top five hundred after falling last week.

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, good time, nice one Heroes.

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 4>Dan Houston is an obvious standout after just tearing the

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 4>Giants to shreds is about the only one that did.

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 4>They was a bit of a dour match, but it

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:37.519
<v Speaker 4>was nice watching watching his score go up on the

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 4>supercach Live page. Just number go Brewer. Very happy with that,

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 4>and my villain I like collectively want to give it

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 4>to Taggers for ruining my middlefield. Just a bad time

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 4>all round. I don't have lucky Neils, so I avoided

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 4>that bullout. But Zach Butters tagged out of the game.

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 4>Tom Green got some heavy attention. Jack Steele I think

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 4>got paid a visit from the Berry Man somewhat. There

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 4>are other players that did bad this week, and I'm

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 4>just trying to forget them. There's yeah that they're they're

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 4>half of the villains, and the other villain, Dane Zorko,

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 4>I think for being on what one hundred and twelve

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 4>twelve at halftime of finishing one hundred and forty one,

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 4>like just incredible seagull energy. He just had the thirst

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 4>for the ball that I haven't seen live in a

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:33.959
<v Speaker 4>long long time on Friday night, and then second half

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 4>he just put his feet up and honestly, Dane, what

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 4>are you doing, mate, Like, if you're gonna like commit,

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 4>just get your ahead in the game, buddy.

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>With that, entire Lion's team basically put the Q in

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the rack. I felt like in the second half they

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>nearly got overrun. But either way al score ranking, hero villain.

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>What have we got now? This is good?

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Part two seven nine I've finished on so yeah, like Pagan,

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 2>like a lot of people did have some sort of underperformance,

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 2>especially in the midfield, but had some obviously some pretty

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 2>good scores to make up for it. You didn't mention

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 2>there was a ruckman in Adelaide who went pretty well.

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, I do contractually need to say that Brodie Grundy

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 4>played very well this weekend and I love him Illy

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 4>Brody XOX. Speaking of good hair.

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 2>But my tradeing this week was Luke Davies Uni XO.

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 2>I was pretty happy with that move. He was on

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 2>seventy four at halftime as a north wind bananas and

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 2>then obviously the game completely changed. He scored zero points

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 2>in the third quarter, but then seventy three in the

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 2>final term.

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>He was absolutely unbelievable.

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunately couldn't quite hold off the meg player juggernaut. But yeah,

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm pretty happy with that trade in. And I thought

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 2>i'd give a special little shout out too to Marcus Bontempelli,

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 2>who has reasserted himself. I know all year we've talked about,

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 2>you know, your Matt Rows and your Zach Butter's and

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 2>Tom Green's, and he's just swatted them all the ways

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 2>back to the number one player in Supercach, number one

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 2>scorer for the season so far, as he was last year,

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 2>massive one hundred and sixty two points after he was

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be under a cloud with illness or whatever

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 2>he had, and he's now nearly seven hundred k well.

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:02.479
<v Speaker 4>So the last time I had the flu, I couldn't

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:06.479
<v Speaker 4>move from my bed to the couch, and Bond comes

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 4>out and has thirty touches and fifteen contested possessions and

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 4>he's just fine.

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:15.799
<v Speaker 1>That's just superhuman, superhuman superman. I did have somebody comparing

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>him to the MJ Flu game, and I'm like, let's

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>not compare a Round fourteen AFL game in the middle

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of June to MJ look in the nineteen ninety eight finals.

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:27.479
<v Speaker 4>But still look if the Western Bulldogs against the Fremantle

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:30.799
<v Speaker 4>Docers at Marvel Stadium in the middle of June isn't

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 4>comparable to the NBA what is James?

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>What is right there? I'll lead off NBASTRAA with that

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>next and a quick villain.

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 2>My other trade in this week I was i'ming an

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 2>ring wather to bring in a defensive primo, which I

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 2>needed to do. I thought I could just hold off

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 2>one more week because there's a few more options on

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 2>the table this week that I quite liked. But I

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 2>thought that's silly to wait. I'll get in an extra

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 2>number for the buyer round. So I got Jordan Clark

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 2>from the Dockers eighty five points. I mean, I think

0:05:57.520 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 2>he was about the third or fourth high scorer for Frio.

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 2>So that's not atrocious, but certainly not what I thought

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 2>I was paying for. So need a bit more out

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 2>of him, Otherwise it'd be nearly temptation to sideways into yea,

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of these other really good defenders that are

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 2>now available this week or even potentially next week.

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 1>I'll pay that villains everybody for me. Sixteen thirty two

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>is what I landed on. It was an absolute horror show.

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Why is that, you might ask, Well, I'll tell you

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>everybody stunk. The entire team about Nick lost, lost and

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 1>stepped up. He was almost my hero there for a second.

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:31.359
<v Speaker 1>He's got one hundred and sixty was fantastic. But my

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>hero is obviously like the likes of Zorco and Heini,

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>because without them I would have been even somehow worse.

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>But mostly the villains, it's the likes of Hayden Young,

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>who I brought in. You talked about the free o

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of depressed scores. He and Sarong we're both wildly underwhelming.

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Young had eighty three strong with the ninety six. It

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>was just brutal on top of them. At the very

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>end of the week. Well, the second last game I

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>guess you have Zach Fisher seventy one, thanks all Zach.

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 2>If that last kick had gone through, that would have

0:06:58.040 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 2>been worth about thirty points.

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:01.839
<v Speaker 1>And then that of the final game of the round,

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Zach Butter's with a seventy six, the hornet, my pod

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>my one remaining po d seventy one, breaking my heart

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:09.279
<v Speaker 1>and of course.

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 4>Get into a pos got.

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.559
<v Speaker 1>Him, and then of course my beloved Tom Green eighty

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>as we've already hit on. So yeah, villains, everybody right,

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>super coach news, injury, suspensions, ol Butters, we've.

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Got any problems we might have, you know, a heap

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 2>around in terms of injury kind of stuff. We talked

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 2>about the bond. It came out after that Collingwood game too.

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Craig mccrazid that Nick Dacos almost didn't play obviously had

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 2>the shit issues and then he was crooked away from

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 2>extend home on Friday or Saturday. Wasn't sure if he

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 2>was going to play. How I think Ed Allen was

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 2>there on standby on Sunday if Nick didn't come up,

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 2>but fortunately he did and was unbelievable, at least after

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 2>his tiger got subbed oubt, which was an interesting move.

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 2>But on the Collingwood front, we obviously they're not playing

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 2>this week with the buye, but we have Jordan Degoe

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 2>and Brody my Check at due back after the bye,

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 2>which could be interesting for some of those Collingwood cheapies

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 2>that a few of us have. And the other one

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned there, Zach Butters really appreciate that tagging attention

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 2>that he was getting from Toby Bedford of all players.

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>A little small forward.

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 4>For the discussed in your voice Toby Bedford, how damn.

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 5>So yeah?

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 2>And then he had a bit of a tanger with

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Tom Green off the ball. He was also his own

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 2>issues as you said, but the vision is very fuzzy,

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 2>but it does look like Zach Coppter or Tom cop

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 2>One around the chops from Zach there. So yes, our

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 2>man Johnny Ralph, who's all over the the Morrow points

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 2>and how that all works, says he could be in trouble,

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 2>might miss a week, which would be just absolute magnificent

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 2>timing in this last by round, which is going to

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 2>be another pretty tricky one.

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 4>Is Zach But it's a good bloke though, can he

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 4>can he get off on a good bloke defense? So

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 4>when they who's a.

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Better bloke, though Tom Greens are pretty good bloke.

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, I don't know, like, I don't know how how

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 4>many wheels do they spin when they decide what his

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 4>penalty is.

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Probably cops it because there's like a bit of a

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Ramsey Bolton kind of lookalike vibe there, and he might

0:08:57.640 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>just not get good bloke points for looking like one

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:01.439
<v Speaker 1>of the worst Arrecter is a game of throats, just say,

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>just say throwing that out there right after round fourteen

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>though the biggest talking points al very easy. It's finally

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the last by around. Yay question mark. I love this

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>idea because they're over after this. At the same time,

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Round fifteen's buyers are Radozi. We are missing the Western Bulldogs, Adelaide,

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Hawthorns and Kilda and Richmond. What does that mean? Bad?

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Some big names players, That's what it means. Seventy seven

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>percent of us own Nick Dakos, Marcus Bontepelli in fifty

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:32.199
<v Speaker 1>four percent, of teams, Jack Steele in twenty five percent,

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:36.319
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Dawson in seventeen Tim English good old English, seventeen percent.

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Dilling more than seven percent as well, the toughest one

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I think for everybody else. So is the rookies, like

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it is sort of that underclass of like you know,

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the bench cover, Lucky Sullivan, Darcy Wilson, Billy Dowling, Nathan Krueger, Hugo,

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the Brothers, Garcia and even your belover came calls leaven

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>on the weekend. Oh rage is loud as well. So

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 1>it is a really really really rough week. How are

0:09:58.200 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you looking at this?

0:09:58.800 --> 0:09:59.479
<v Speaker 6>Hell?

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it's just because it's the last buy around.

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 2>I think we sort of have less wiggle room because

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't have too many players that I really want

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 2>to get rid of at this stage. So yeah, if

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 2>you've been able to manage it to get eighteen or

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 2>nineteen this week, I think we'll be doing well. I

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 2>think I might have nineteen at this stage, but that

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 2>includes Zach Butters, so he could be on thin ice.

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Maybe use a trade or to bring somebody in, but

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to be. You know, the team's actually

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.080
<v Speaker 2>looking pretty good. I think one thing I try and

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 2>do coming into especially the last buy round, is shuffle

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 2>your team around and make sure you check it before

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 2>the round starts, so you're not going in like this,

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 2>but just put everybody where you want them. After the

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 2>buys and then see you know where the holes are,

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:37.959
<v Speaker 2>so that the trades you might make this week, I'm

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 2>not going to muck things up and you end up

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 2>with someone Zak Fisher is stuck in your back line

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 2>where as you need him you know, you don't have

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 2>enough forwards or something like that. So yeah, that's one

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 2>little piece of advice. But it's not that easy. But

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 2>there are some good players coming off the round fourteen

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 2>by that you could potentially bring in this week who

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 2>would help the situation.

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 4>Good players and cheap players too comparative to you know,

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 4>what you'd be expecting to pay. You know, there are

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:02.439
<v Speaker 4>a few guys in that five hundred, five hundred and

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 4>fifty k bracket that could really, you know, go a

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 4>long way. And there's there's a few guys even even

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 4>cheaper who could could make a bit of a splash

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 4>as a even as a F seven m nine kind

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 4>of situation as well.

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll pay that. So the top targets coming off that

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>round fourteen by, which was obviously absolute countage, Zach Merritt

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>at five seventy seven not bad. It is a great

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>price for him. He's a good player, can't play a bit,

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>might be like right there on the brown load to

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>you're just saying, Jordan Ridley five sixty three K. I

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>have questions basically mostly around my not so beloved Nick

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Martin and how Ridley is just basically completely stealing all

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of his points. And I'm fascinated to see what happens,

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>like with one more week, So this week coming up,

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>just what happens we might have to punt Nick Martin again?

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Could I trade a guy out twice in a year?

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>We're about to find out. I do remembermcgoverned as well,

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>five hundred and fifty five K. Coming up the Eagles

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>by an interesting sort of point where he's been really good.

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>The Eagle's been handy. Can you trust it? Can you

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>trust those like you know, the soft tissue injuries of

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a McGovern I don't know outside of that. Matt Rowe

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>five forty one, Sam Walsh five forty eight, Charlie Kerno

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>four hundred and forty eight. We'll talk about that again later,

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know. There's some pretty good names there.

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and like as yeah, Patch mentioned a lot of

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 2>those guys. Like last week we were talking about potentially

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 2>getting a Luke Ryan, who's six hundred and seventy K

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 2>or something like that. So these prices are all pretty appealing.

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of it is going to be

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 2>team depended. Do you need a midfielder, do you need

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 2>a forward? Do you need a defender?

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I think there are some good defenders on the menu.

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 4>Line by line and just yeahs you're interested in.

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, we start with the defense and they are sort

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 2>of the two that I put down that I thought

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 2>are probably the standouts Ridley and McGovern Really is the

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 2>number one averaging defender based on averages, but he hasn't

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 2>played three games, so it's skewed a little bit. But

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 2>do you think he can keep that kind of scoring up.

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I certainly, based on what we've seen, can go

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:01.839
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and ten for the rest of the year.

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that's that's too much in question. The

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 4>concern would be if he has to play key position.

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 4>We saw that against Carlton where they lined him up

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 4>on Kerno for a little while. That's not a role

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 4>he tends to score very well in over long periods,

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 4>and also not a role he tends to play as

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 4>well as you'd like. So hopefully that doesn't happen long term.

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 4>But I don't think hopefully it doesn't. So, yeah, he's

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 4>he's certainly one i'd be looking very closely at. Yeah,

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 4>I think he's great.

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, No, probably I've got McGovern, but Ridley's the one. Yeah,

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 2>I thought I could have waited this week to get him,

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 2>but I went early on Clark and I do regret that.

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Obviously he missed the first ten rounds with injuries, so

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 2>that's always a bit of a red flag. But as

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:44.079
<v Speaker 2>he said, McGovern has his own worries back there. Max

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:45.839
<v Speaker 2>Holmes is another one that you could throw in as

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 2>definite pod, but he's a little bit more expensive than

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 2>those guys.

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 4>Elliott Yoe's the one will yeah out out of the

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 4>Eagles at five hundred and fourteen K.

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>That's been of an injury red flags.

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, yeah, I mean that's the concern, and you know

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 4>you'd then want to cover, want some cover from a

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 4>rookie or from someone else, just because he will miss

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 4>games on the run home. But his average is also

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, could average hundred and fifteen on the run

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 4>home based on what we saw earlier in the season,

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 4>so you got to weigh that up. Mason Redmond also

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:18.199
<v Speaker 4>intrigues me. He short, he score feels like it should

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 4>be lower. With Ridley and the team, it's been better.

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 4>He's average one hundred and five over his last last three.

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 4>I think it is. I'm not endorsing it. I'm just

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 4>saying that it's a thing. He's intriguing me. At five

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 4>hundred and fifteen K.

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>It's just patch with some facts, a whimsical patch over

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>heear just maybe maybe well in terms of the so

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the mids there, so Zarh and ral Walsh. I mean,

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>how do we feel about those three names? Just in general?

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm going on back on Mason and Tangent. I'm concerned

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 4>about Merit in the run home. He's got of the

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 4>seven teams of the you know, have many games left.

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 4>He's got six tagging roles coming up. So he's got

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 4>James Jordan, he's got Berry from the Lions. He's got

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 4>could face Mickelaney from the Crows.

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it is Windegger at some stage.

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 4>I possibly win Haager. I saw it on Twitter the

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 4>other day, but somebody went went through and went, you know,

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 4>Merrit's a great price, but he's going to couple a

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 4>lot of attention on the run home, and I think

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 4>it's something to consider when you look at bring him in.

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 4>He can break through that tag like he kind of

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 4>did against Carlton with Chinkota. But I don't know something

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 4>to be aware of buy him just here?

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 2>What do you think of a more sort of a

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 2>value options there in rail and Welsh. I looked up

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 2>many Real's numbers and his averages about one hundred and

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 2>forty something at the famed People's First Stadium, but away

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 2>from there he sort of struggles to break the Ton

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 2>and they've got four People's First Stadium games left.

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 4>That's not as many as you'd like it. They have

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 4>to leave the motherland and go fight on frontiers abroad.

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 4>But I probably wouldn't be trading Rowl in. But I

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 4>mean he's he's got a decent, decent build for super coach.

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, I'm not sold nice Welsh.

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Carlton fixture gets a little bit easier

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>back up in the season as well, where they've got

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>games against your beloved side zarre L North. There's like

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>West Coast of the second last week or whatever. There's

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple of interesting ones in there. But I've already

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>got him, so I'm like happy days and up forward.

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean there are other names that you're sort of

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>kicking around outside of like.

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 3>Charlie speaking of your beloved Blues and yeah, fixture, we've

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 3>got what Harry McKay and Charlie Kerner at five and

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 3>twenty two K and five hundred and forty six K, respectively.

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 4>Four hundred, I think you've got four hundred. Oh did

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 4>I say five hundred? Four hundred and forty six. I'm

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 4>bringing one of them in this week. I think I'm

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 4>just for that loop position that last. Like they'll sit

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 4>on the bench some weeks and they'll come on other

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 4>weeks if I can loop them on. But the value

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 4>is real good with that run.

0:16:57.720 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know that I have enough trades to it,

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 2>or not in a position yet anyway to do have

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 2>them as a spare a seventh forward. But I think

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 2>my last forward position, similar to last week. I could

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 2>wait a week and get ranking in two weeks after

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Adelaide's by, or get someone now, and I don't think

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:16.159
<v Speaker 2>I can afford to wait with you know, maybe just

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:18.439
<v Speaker 2>scratching eighteen on the field this week. I need to

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 2>get someone who's playing, And yeah, I do like that

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 2>Carlton draw and I just think probably Kurno ahead of

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 2>McKay in the sense that he's the kind of go

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:28.199
<v Speaker 2>in one of those games, maybe against the Richmond in

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 2>a couple of weeks, or against a North or a

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 2>West Coast, he could kick nine and score one hundred

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 2>and eighty and then even if he's scoring eighties and

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 2>seventies and nineties and things, for the rest of the season, overall,

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 2>you sort of end up with a pretty good average.

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:42.479
<v Speaker 2>So given the issues we've had all year with the forwards,

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 2>I think maybe this is the year to just take

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 2>a chance on someone like him.

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 4>And he was the third most expensive forward to start

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 4>the season. Yeah, in that in that top five range,

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 4>and he.

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 2>Hasn't been terrible, he's just sort of yeah, he's been

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:56.400
<v Speaker 2>around the eighty ninety mark most.

0:17:56.200 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 1>W I might wait on ranking. I'm just saying. And

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Taggers is the other sort of big storyline. So far

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>we've sort of seen the rise to prominence.

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 4>Just before we jump to Taggers, I want to be

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 4>whimsical again for a second. Jeremy Cameron is four hundred

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 4>and two dollars. He's yes, even I'm not saying do it,

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 4>but and gel is actually.

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe maybe I've got him in a draft and it's

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:24.639
<v Speaker 1>like one of the like just having Jeremy Cameron on

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:26.919
<v Speaker 1>your team is just kind of fun. Like this is

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>just neat because you don't know what's gonna happen. One

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty, he might have thirty. There's not a

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>time in between. Sometimes it's awesome. So a bit of chaos,

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>but the Tagers vibe belt take us through this because

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Taggers have been just making a mockery of super coach

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:42.639
<v Speaker 1>scores I think this year, haven't they They're just like,

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a really cute, little cute little score you've got the.

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Last couple of weeks, I think Ross lyone is the

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 2>one to blame.

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 4>And when when is rossign not well blame like just

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 4>every green lag, it's Ross's fault. Ross did it.

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 2>He talked about catching up with old mate Ryan Crowley

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 2>for a coffee over in Perth, and that's what sort

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:03.360
<v Speaker 2>of said seemed to set this whole thing in motion. That, yeah,

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 2>taking that was pretty fun when we used to just

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 2>like harass Gary Emblet junior and players like that. So

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 2>why don't we give that a try? Micaus winheg has

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 2>been really good at it. And then we get all

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 2>these other teams deciding they're going to have a go

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 2>at it, and Will Phillips goes to Nick Dacoss, he's

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 2>a laid in and goes and plays a tagging role.

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Will and Drew's done it a few times before. We

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 2>mentioned Toby Bedford sort of came from nowhere. So there's

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 2>just a lot of them around and it's hard to

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 2>really put too fine a point on it other than

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 2>just saying, as you said with Zach Merritt, maybe it's

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 2>worth looking at upcoming fixtures and who you think might

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 2>be in the gun.

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>And there's you know, with all these guys.

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Just in the next few weeks, I'm seeing a lot

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 2>of them are playing a Sydney or playing in Adelaide.

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 4>And James Jordan the really really hairy one after the

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 4>it's the Star Wars thing, which I think we've done

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 4>the joke before of you were supposed to join the

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 4>good Scorers, not destroy But how do we find the

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 4>high ground over taggers?

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it's over, it's over back. Yeah, all right,

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>there you go. Tager is going to keep an eye

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 1>on that because they just I feel like they're basically

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 1>each week looking at my team and going, all right,

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:11.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll take him out, take him out, taking him out,

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 1>take him out. Maybe I should have just been smarter

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>about who I brought in. All right, let's say a

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>quick break and we'll go to the Phantom and talk

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:26.160
<v Speaker 1>some bubble boys right after the douce. All right, we've

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>all been waiting for this exact moment from parts unknown.

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you what. He is absolutely flying at the moment.

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 1>It is Phantom to talk some bubble boys, Phantom, what

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 1>is going on?

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 5>Hello, gentlemen, thanks for having me again. Flying maybe not

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:44.679
<v Speaker 5>quite the right word. I'm going okay, they're all going

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 5>to hit a roadblock again. Thank with the buyers are

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 5>almost over, Hopefully the rookie situation starts to look a

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 5>bit nice on the other side.

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's start, obviously with some of these ones that we've

0:20:57.680 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>actually just had pop off this week. Al you've got

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Arish one Maker after what one game? And Carl Warner

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>question mark after one game and then a million years

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and then another game. What are we feeling?

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 7>Well?

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 2>The challenge, I think, Phantom, is that what we want

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 2>is someone cheap who is going to play this week

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 2>and then ideally stay around and give us some cover

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 2>for the rest of the season. If you're on the bubble,

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 2>that's great. This time of a year, we can probably

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 2>afford to take a chance on someone who's only maybe

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 2>played one game. But the names playing this week, how

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 2>do we feel about We've got a Jack Hutchinson who

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 2>made his debut for the Eagles a couple of weeks ago.

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 2>He gets picked again, only one or two K forward

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Carl Warner, as James mentioned, played his second game on

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 2>the weekend for the Dockers. Are they guys we can

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 2>potentially pick with any confidence this week?

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 6>Interesting?

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 5>Going to love to be able to say, let's pick

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 5>Hutchinson one hundred and two K straight out the mid

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 5>season draft.

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 6>I mean I could even go there as well.

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 5>Look, it makes if it makes you the money, as

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 5>we've said a lot on this show previously, to make

0:21:56.960 --> 0:21:59.400
<v Speaker 5>the other trade, then maybe you do it to you Yes,

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 5>in need, but it's not the beal and end all

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 5>this time of the year, and they're probably going to play,

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 5>and they've picked him to play, and they've picked him

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 5>after he was at the club for what seven or

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 5>eight days, So that's a good sign. Carl Warner is

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 5>the interesting one at for we saw Heath Chapman was

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 5>the late withdrawal with a hamstring issue and yet to

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 5>see exactly how bad that issue is. But such an

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 5>injury pron player could keep him out. May We saw

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 5>Warner take some kickings actually looked a bit like Luke Bryan.

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 5>Luke Ryan, I should stay trying to channel the Luke Ryan,

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 5>same boots, same hair, got back to the goal square

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.439
<v Speaker 5>to take kickings for Frio, which was good to see.

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 5>Seventy eight super coach points. He has seven intercept possessions,

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 5>two intercept marks in the display against the Bulldogs. Ideally

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 5>he's named again and you know, we don't want to

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 5>see Heath Chapman injured. But if they give him a

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 5>couple more weeks to get that hamstring right, then maybe

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 5>Carl Warner is the one that's playing this week and

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 5>hopefully make a big bit of cash in that role

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 5>alongside Lacrian.

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 4>What did you make of the super Boot, the Tasmanian

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 4>Superboot who debuted for the Saints on the weekend. I

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 4>know he's now on the bye, but dare I say it?

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Decent junior numbers, decent junior numbers.

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 6>You know me too well there, Patch.

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.439
<v Speaker 5>But he was a big super coach star as a

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 5>junior in the Coach League playing for TAZ mainly one

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 5>hundred and forty seven super coach points per game, two

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 5>double tons as a junior last year, and we spoke

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:37.360
<v Speaker 5>about his numbers coming into the st cuitter side last

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 5>week one hundred and forty three in the VFL before

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 5>he got the call up to make his.

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 6>Aid AFL debut.

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 5>Eighteen disposals, four intercept sessions two in the set marks

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 5>and of course when eighty seven percent by foot, so

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 5>doesn't need a lot of the ball to score well

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 5>like in his junior career. And he showed that in

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 5>his first game on the big stage has an impact

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 5>kicks long inside fifty and they went to him despite

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:03.880
<v Speaker 5>he's still a kid in his first game. So good

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 5>sign to Mari there Again, disappointing thing. I won't be

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 5>there with the buy this week, but if you don't

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:12.360
<v Speaker 5>need the extra number, go down here make the cash.

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:14.959
<v Speaker 6>It's a nice coverage going forward.

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:18.640
<v Speaker 1>There's also another name floating around there, al Joe Menzie.

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>How are you feeling about this at two hundred and

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>nine K I know patch is no fan here? Is

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>it an option? What do we reckon?

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's only an option because he had a new

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 2>role last time. I'senon and played two weeks ago, sort

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 2>of known more for his small forward work, but he

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 2>actually played more as a kind of a half back.

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 2>Wrecked up a decent score ninety two. He's got a

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 2>big negative break even this week. What do you think, Fantom,

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 2>and then we might get patches verdict As a close

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 2>essence watcher, yes, I.

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 5>Do want to hear that that could be the decisive factor.

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.880
<v Speaker 5>But the small forward took four intercept marks in that

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 5>game in that newal, which was surprising. Has had a

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:02.439
<v Speaker 5>big impact on that final score you mentioned now. But

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:05.439
<v Speaker 5>is that where he is perhaps going forward? Is he

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:07.400
<v Speaker 5>in that defense, he's even in the side.

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 4>I don't know the answer to either of those questions,

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 4>and that would that concern is enough for me to

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 4>write him off as not someone I'd be looking at.

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 4>Maybe if he was one hundred and two k maybe

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 4>we might be having a slightly different discussion. But you know,

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 4>I thought he got lost, and I thought he just

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:27.680
<v Speaker 4>like had come on the intertange gates and had been

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 4>like yelled out to go just gone the wrong way

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 4>or I don't know what had happened, but it was

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 4>very confusing seeing him down back. He didn't like his

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 4>numbers were quite good. I didn't think he looked incredible.

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 4>Certainly wasn't you know, incredibly damaging or you know, he

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 4>was fine but not, you know, not nothing to write

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 4>home about. I thought Mason Redmond was missing from that game.

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 4>Jake Kelly was playing forward for some ungodly reason. You know,

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 4>I just I'm not convinced the Mensi will keep that role.

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 4>When you know Nick Martin went forward and that was

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 4>why Menzi went back. I'm not sure Nick Martin forward

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 4>will continue long term. And even if it does, there'll

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 4>be games when MENSI plays its a small forward. Games

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 4>three plays the sub. If he's added another string to

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 4>his bow, that means he's more versatile, which means he

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 4>can come on as the sub and play at either end.

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 4>That's bad news for super coach. He's the sub. But

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 4>I just I don't. I don't like it. It scares

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 4>me and I'd be steering clear.

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:31.959
<v Speaker 6>Here's your verdict.

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>It certainly is a verdict. We've also got a couple

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>of rookies on the round fifteen by here as well. No,

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>we've got Billy Dowling and Nathan Krueger as well as strawnee,

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>which is always when Kieran Strawn. I mean, how are

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>we looking at them for two weeks from now? Phantom?

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 1>Are you keeping an eye on them? Have you already

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>brought in your beloved Billy Dowling? What are we talking about?

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 5>I did bringing Billy Dowling last week. He was pretty

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:01.360
<v Speaker 5>good again an impact, didn't have a lot of the ball,

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 5>didn't have as much as he did on Debuo, but

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 5>still you know, made the possession count for the Crows

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:10.400
<v Speaker 5>and I'm sure Matthew Nicks will notice that.

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 6>Hopefully keep him in the side. He's got to keep

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 6>the kids in.

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 5>Kieren Strawn obviously not a kid an absolute bar from

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 5>Brodie Grundy on Saturday Night as one side as you'll get.

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 5>So surely a couple of weeks for Riley O'Brien the

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:28.439
<v Speaker 5>two's you think he probably goes back to Riley O'Brien

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 5>Matthew Nicks, So I wouldn't be banking on Kieran Strawn,

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 5>but I think Billy Dowling hopefully gets an extended run

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 5>from here.

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Nice one, All right? Al what else we got?

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:40.919
<v Speaker 2>Well, I just wanted to ask about an option that

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 2>starts to come into view as the sort of the

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 2>finish line is visible in the distance and you don't

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 2>want to be doing it too far out, but if

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 2>you need to make a move and it just gets

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 2>a bit tricky, now where you really I need a

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 2>rookie in the midfield, So you know, Carl warn is

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 2>not really going to help me.

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Jack Hudgens is not going to help me.

0:27:57.600 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 2>What do you think of bringing in someone who you

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 2>know is not most likely going to play, but then

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 2>just grabbing the cheapest guy who's available one hundred and

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 2>two thousand with some DPP ideally who can give you

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:10.879
<v Speaker 2>some flexibility on the bench for the run home if

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 2>you've got you know, if I've got a Billy Dowling

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 2>sitting on my forward bench, I can bring in a

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 2>mid forward one O two k spud in the midfield

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 2>he's not going to play, and try and give myself

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 2>some coverage that way, and that gives me something to

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 2>downgrade to this week to forrab some money.

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 6>Yep.

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 5>I like and I think this stage of the season

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 5>as well, team some teams out there will start to

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 5>you know, bring in a cheaper option. You're maybe a

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 5>kind of rosy or something like that, an extra premium

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 5>on the bench so you don't need every one of

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 5>your bench players playing. If you've got some quality there,

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 5>you can afford to throw those positions, some of those

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 5>positions out and make the cash you need, especially if

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 5>you've got that DPP swings open up. If you've got

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 5>one or two or three players who can cover in

0:28:56.840 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 5>multiple decisions, that's all you need, hopefully in the run home. Yes,

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 5>it could all backfire, but I think you have to

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 5>take the punt, follow through with it, use the money

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 5>when you need to use the money, and quality over

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 5>quantity on the bench at this point.

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Very nice. I don't mind that idea all right. Was

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>anything else you wanted to hit on with the fandom there, gentlemen.

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 2>And now that that was my big question, I think

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 2>that's cleared my path for a trade this week.

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I like it, all right. So that's the phantom that

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 1>has been the bubble Boys. There's a couple of interesting

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>names there between showmaker, Warner and Hutchinson. So I guess

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the biggest advice at the moment is wait for teams basically,

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess.

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 4>The only other question is is there anyone coming onto

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 4>the buy this week who you'd like to keep looking at,

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 4>saying a Joel Fraser, a Harvey Harrison. You know, any

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 4>one of these guys that have all suddenly hit the

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 4>bit at the same time. Is it worth trying to

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 4>hold you know, trying to move heaven and Earth to

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 4>hold on twenty of these guys or are they all

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 4>on the chopping.

0:29:56.680 --> 0:30:00.080
<v Speaker 5>Block, all on the chopping block, all in the And

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 5>I think, whatever you need to do to get that

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 5>next premium to execute that trade plan you've been working on,

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 5>do it. There's no Harley Reid type at his best,

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 5>so we all trade it anyway that you probably need

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 5>to hang on and can have a big score from here. Again,

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 5>if you've got a couple of you know, fattened cash

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 5>cow options and you can be a bit picky, then yes,

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 5>you keep a Joel Frasier who has been quite good

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 5>for the Bulldogs and probably holds his spot DPP and

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 5>shown he can score pretty well and could be some

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 5>good cover if you need in the run home.

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 6>But otherwise, chop whoever if you need it.

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 4>Yes, sir, don't need to tell me twice.

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I just got the chop. All right, there

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you go. That's been the Phantom. Thanks for jumping back on, Phantom.

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Always great advice.

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 6>James outpatch in see you guys.

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll just add an awesome chat with the Fantom.

0:30:56.080 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Now let's go have a chat with the one only

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the Godfather, the Coach of ABS Magic, currently ranked one

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>O two. He's had a top four finish before. It's

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 1>an absolute cracking chat. Enjoy all right, now we welcome

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>on a very special guest. He's one of the very

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>few people in the super Coach world ranked higher than

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 1>her very own Al Peyton. That's a shot across the

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 1>bow just saying it is the s Godfather, the Coach

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of ABS Magic, the Godfather. You're looking very ominous at

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the moment. How are you feeling about your season so far?

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Are you happy with where you're at? Ranked one hundred

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and two overall?

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 8>Firstly, thank you for having me on and Al Patron.

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 8>I'm a big fan of and we chat all the time.

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 8>And Al Peton's trying to get my number four overall ranking.

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 7>You're trying to get higher out. I understand that, but

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 7>I'm going to my rank overall one O two.

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 8>I'm very happy, but at the same time, I'm very upset.

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 7>Make me very upset. I can't come there.

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 8>Okay with spuds. But last week we were ranked eighty. We

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 8>were happy with that. But this week I got power

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 8>in my team and he let me down. He makes

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 8>me very upset. So we're traveling. Okay, we're not too bad.

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Last one, what's uh do you have a spud in mind?

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Is there been a spud this year that's really just

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>sputted up for you that you're really disappointed in.

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 8>I had two spuds last week that we sacked. We

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 8>had to remove them from the team, and Nick Martin

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 8>was one of them. Yeah, now, Nick Martin, we started

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 8>with Nick Martin.

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 7>He is a con artist.

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 8>Okay, he came me in and so I started with

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 8>Nick Martin and then I traded him out after round one.

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 8>We got rid of him. Then we brought him back

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 8>because we missed him. Okay, we because they had team

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 8>is full of spuds. We needed to spud back, so

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 8>we brought him back in and then we had to

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 8>sack him last week. So he's gone, he's finished, and

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 8>we sent him away to far away so he's not

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 8>going to come back anymore. We also had another spud

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 8>that we had to sack. Actually we have a lot

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 8>of spuds, but we couldn't sack Green. We have to

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 8>We're stuck with Green. This we sacked Powell. He's gone.

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 8>There's no longer tim Pellma team.

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 2>So for people who aren't familiar with your work, of course,

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty two finished fourth overall, as you said,

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 2>after being the overall leader for a fair portion of

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 2>the run home and famously running out of trades with

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 2>I think seven eight, ten weeks to go or something

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 2>like that.

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 1>But you do take a bit of a.

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Unique approach to super coach, which obviously works for you.

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 2>But how did you, if you can summon up briefly,

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 2>how did you attack this season? Obviously we had a

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 2>lot of different things happening with opening around and all

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 2>these buyers and everything, But how did you attack it?

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 2>And would you say that's worked for you? Would you

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 2>do it the same or different next year?

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 8>This year, I've got very excite, okay, because I saw

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 8>forty trades. Okay, I felt my chair when I saw

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 8>the forty trades, So I thought maybe this year that

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 8>they made superca just for me, okay, so I it

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:13.279
<v Speaker 8>was just built for myself. Unfortunately, I've used a lot

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 8>of those trades, so they're all gone. So I saw

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 8>that I saw the by rounds early on, all right,

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 8>and I did a little exercise. I actually did this

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 8>on my channel, and I did a team with mid prices,

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:28.320
<v Speaker 8>and I thought, because that's how I normally attacked the

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:31.879
<v Speaker 8>season with mid prices, but with the by rounds, mid

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:35.840
<v Speaker 8>prices don't work because you need players that can score massive,

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 8>all right, So you need you need players that can

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:39.320
<v Speaker 8>score one twenty one thirty high ceiling players.

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 7>So I made it.

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:44.279
<v Speaker 8>After round one, I changed the whole team around and

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 8>I brought in I brought in Luke Ryan. I brought

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 8>in a virtually sacked Nick Martin for Luke Ryan after

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:53.399
<v Speaker 8>round one because I saw his ceiling. Then I then

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:57.360
<v Speaker 8>I brought in well, another player that's not playing that

0:34:57.360 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 8>well now, which is so wrong. So I brought in

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 8>so wrong in round in round one in round one also,

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 8>so I've actually wanted players with high ceilings to play

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:08.240
<v Speaker 8>the the early by rounds.

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 7>So I went for guns.

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:15.840
<v Speaker 2>And rookies, and your rookies were I think for a memory,

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 2>you sort of steered away from some of the more

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 2>expensive types and a lot of us were picking.

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, well, because we're on a on a tight budget okay,

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 8>and we have our manager at the recruiting manager. His

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 8>name is Titas Okay, so we we sort of had

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:36.239
<v Speaker 8>to get the cheaposts stuff. So we went to We

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:39.240
<v Speaker 8>didn't look in Australia. We went to China, okay, and

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:41.240
<v Speaker 8>we got it. We've got a shipping in from China

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 8>a container fluor spuds and we got all the cheapots.

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 8>So we missed out on the players like uh like read.

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 8>We couldn't afford the good stuff, so we got all

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 8>the cheap oots. But unfortunately actually actually posts were not

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:56.320
<v Speaker 8>too bad that it came out of rape but summers buds,

0:35:56.400 --> 0:35:58.319
<v Speaker 8>So it was a it was a mixed bag.

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you've come out the last couple of years and

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 4>you know named your weapon and at the start of

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:07.799
<v Speaker 4>the year you were big on Matt Rowl and I

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:10.879
<v Speaker 4>wanted to follow. You were scared by the bye didn't

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:14.280
<v Speaker 4>get him until much later. Have you felt about about

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 4>rail season and do you have a weapon for the

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:17.800
<v Speaker 4>run home for those of sort of looking for the

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 4>for the last spot in our team. Have you got

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 4>anyone you're just eyeing offers as a weapon ready to explode?

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:28.239
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, with Rail, I was so so happy that no

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 8>one owned him. Only three percent started with him, and

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 8>it make me very happy. Okay, And but what happened

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 8>now is he's got a lot of owners, so there's

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:39.279
<v Speaker 8>a lot of weight on his shoulders near the poor

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 8>young man, and he can't carry everybody. Okay, you kindly

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 8>carry out his magic so that the weapon has become

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 8>a spud neil, so he's no longer a weapon. We

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 8>need a new one, and I've looked around. I've got

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 8>two of free in mind that I really like. We're

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 8>going to have a weapon, and I'm going to try

0:36:57.560 --> 0:37:02.240
<v Speaker 8>to green this week, so I'm going to do something different.

0:37:02.560 --> 0:37:04.879
<v Speaker 8>I've decided that we're not going to have a twenty

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 8>third primo and we're going to We're going to go

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 8>extra with weapons on field, so we're going to bring

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 8>in It's I like. I like Ed Richards a lot,

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:19.800
<v Speaker 8>all right, However, Ed Richards with liber in the team

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:20.880
<v Speaker 8>maybe not the best.

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 7>Now. I'm lucking liber A lots, all right.

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:23.600
<v Speaker 2>But.

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:30.240
<v Speaker 8>Liba, he's okay. But I've sort of now going towards

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 8>Ridley from Essendon and that he's going to be my weapon.

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 8>So Riddley's going to carry our team hopefully to the

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 8>top ten. Okay, that's his job.

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 1>That's one I love the I love the idea of

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the spud farming because that's I'm the expert spud farmer.

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I think over here on this panel just at a horrible,

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 1>horrible year. But my spud crop has grown just exponentially.

0:37:55.680 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 1>It's been absolutely fantastic. They've stunk up the joint basically

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:01.880
<v Speaker 1>they've been laying there into rot in the sun. But

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 1>really do you have like how many trades do you

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 1>have there? First? And then secondly, like how do you

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>see yourself getting up from one O one O four,

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 1>one O two overall rank back into that top ten?

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 1>You can you see your way?

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:18.720
<v Speaker 7>Well?

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:21.359
<v Speaker 8>With the current spons that I've got, I don't see

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 8>away because I can side.

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 7>I saw our patent's team and my my spots.

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 8>We had a meeting this morning after seeing our patent's

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:30.719
<v Speaker 8>team and we're very scared. Okay, so we think our

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:33.760
<v Speaker 8>patent's going to overtake us. So we've had a crisis

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:36.280
<v Speaker 8>meeting right now and we're.

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 7>Going to We're going to bring in Ridley.

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:42.439
<v Speaker 8>We think the thing is now we need pods, Okay,

0:38:42.520 --> 0:38:45.399
<v Speaker 8>we need players that no one else has, because either

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:48.320
<v Speaker 8>we're going to bust or we're gonna fly. Okay, it's

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 8>gonna be one of the two. And Houston killed us

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 8>this week. We're very upset when we saw Houston. I

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 8>could have come a deal sixth, but anyway, Houston scoring

0:38:58.640 --> 0:39:03.799
<v Speaker 8>one seventy owned him, okay, and that hurts. So we

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:06.560
<v Speaker 8>need players that only one percent or two percent have

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:09.960
<v Speaker 8>that can score what Houston did that will get us back.

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 8>So we'll see how our pods go. We're going to

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:14.400
<v Speaker 8>bring in a few pods.

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 4>Now, So how many trades do you have? Abs?

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:21.840
<v Speaker 8>It's a sensitive topic right now, the trades topic. Okay,

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 8>so we have we have seven lefts. Okay, but I'm

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:31.759
<v Speaker 8>gonna I'm gonna use Actually we got ten leaves before

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:34.799
<v Speaker 8>this week, so I'm gonna use three this week. I'm

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:38.279
<v Speaker 8>going to use free next week, so we're gonna have

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 8>four on the run home.

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 7>Actually know I've it's.

0:39:42.840 --> 0:39:47.720
<v Speaker 4>Okay, look a's sensitive information. We understand that there are.

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:50.759
<v Speaker 7>I don't look at my trades. I don't think to

0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:51.359
<v Speaker 7>become trades.

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:53.919
<v Speaker 8>Now, I've eng up seven this week, so I said team,

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 8>it's only seven, so it's going to be four lefts

0:39:56.080 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 8>after this week.

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:00.919
<v Speaker 7>We don't have a we don't have an F five

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 7>or F six.

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:05.479
<v Speaker 8>Okay, we've only got spuds there, so we we can't

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:08.360
<v Speaker 8>afford the rankings. We've decided we're not gonna go for

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:10.319
<v Speaker 8>a ranking because a good player, good players don't come

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:12.799
<v Speaker 8>to his magic. So we're gonna we're gonna bring in

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:15.760
<v Speaker 8>some some more, two more spuds in our forward line,

0:40:15.840 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 8>and we're going to have two trades on the run

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 8>home with a full team.

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:22.439
<v Speaker 7>And and that full team is going to be No.

0:40:22.440 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 7>Twenty third, So what's.

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:27.360
<v Speaker 4>The what's the bench cover like?

0:40:27.400 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 6>Then?

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:29.279
<v Speaker 4>Have you got what Billy Dowling? Do you have? Like

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 4>a Joel Fraser? Who have you got on the pie

0:40:32.320 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 4>in case somebody does?

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:35.719
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, we had Joel Frasier, but he's going to go,

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 8>so we need his cash. So we're gonna we're gonna

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:42.000
<v Speaker 8>have Billy Dowling. We're gonna try to bring in one

0:40:42.040 --> 0:40:44.399
<v Speaker 8>of those cheap o because as you know, we don't

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:46.480
<v Speaker 8>have the expensive stuff of that magic, so we don't

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:49.560
<v Speaker 8>bring in a cheap old defender that hopefully is going

0:40:49.600 --> 0:40:51.719
<v Speaker 8>to get a run home, so maybe shown Maker will

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:55.879
<v Speaker 8>be our D seven. We've got rock Cover, We've got

0:40:55.880 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 8>we've got the Uh, We've got an r free that's

0:40:59.160 --> 0:41:04.480
<v Speaker 8>playing Strawn who's snail okay, but they is doing okay,

0:41:04.560 --> 0:41:08.000
<v Speaker 8>So hopefully Strawn gets to play the whole year, and

0:41:08.360 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 8>we're going to get a lot of what you called

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:14.360
<v Speaker 8>dead rookies, look one or two k rookies with DPP,

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 8>so we've can switch everything around. And our main main

0:41:17.760 --> 0:41:21.080
<v Speaker 8>player to save us is going to be Dowling, Okay,

0:41:21.120 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 8>So we're relying on Dowling to to carry us home

0:41:24.719 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 8>this year, so we'll see how it goes.

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Nice one, was there anything else wanting to hit on there?

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:30.400
<v Speaker 6>Al?

0:41:31.200 --> 0:41:33.920
<v Speaker 2>I think Abbs has covered of most of the issues there.

0:41:33.920 --> 0:41:36.200
<v Speaker 2>I saw Elder You is another nice little pod that

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:38.759
<v Speaker 2>we may both picked up this week, which worked out

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:39.399
<v Speaker 2>pretty well.

0:41:39.440 --> 0:41:41.400
<v Speaker 1>But what do you see in Ridley that.

0:41:41.600 --> 0:41:43.720
<v Speaker 2>You think he can deliver some of those spike scores

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:45.719
<v Speaker 2>that might get you over the top of some of

0:41:45.760 --> 0:41:47.319
<v Speaker 2>the other popular defenders out there.

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 8>Well, Ridley very similar to Dale, and I really love

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:54.399
<v Speaker 8>Dale's game where Dale takes all the kickings, and there's

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:57.840
<v Speaker 8>a lot of these one, two, three ten pointers, and

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:01.239
<v Speaker 8>Ridley's the same type of character where he gets his

0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 8>points ten points in one hit, just from one kicking.

0:42:04.680 --> 0:42:07.279
<v Speaker 8>So that's why I like Ridley a lot. And also

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:09.920
<v Speaker 8>I like the fact that he actually intercept Mark so

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:14.239
<v Speaker 8>he's the playmaker from defense. I can actually see him

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:18.439
<v Speaker 8>finishing better than Luke Ryan on the run home because

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:20.439
<v Speaker 8>of his ability to market the ball.

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:23.720
<v Speaker 7>The only problem with Ridley is the calves.

0:42:23.760 --> 0:42:25.799
<v Speaker 8>Okay, so we're gonna have We're gonna take a risk,

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:29.399
<v Speaker 8>and hopefully he doesn't get injured, but it's it's top

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:31.200
<v Speaker 8>ten or bus so you might. You're just going to

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:35.239
<v Speaker 8>go for it now. So the leader or actually the

0:42:35.239 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 8>team is coming third. I've been following, I've been watching him. Okay,

0:42:38.200 --> 0:42:41.959
<v Speaker 8>we've got the spies out at the camp and he's

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 8>got half a million more than we have. Okay, he's

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:46.319
<v Speaker 8>a rich club. Okay, we're at the poor club at

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:49.799
<v Speaker 8>that magic. So we've got to we've got to beat

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:52.760
<v Speaker 8>teams like this now, and it's not easy, and especially

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:55.440
<v Speaker 8>ol Peyton breathing down my back okay, and and got

0:42:55.480 --> 0:42:58.239
<v Speaker 8>Tim Mitchell flying behind me as well, and so.

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:03.960
<v Speaker 7>We gotta we gotta uh get different players.

0:43:04.000 --> 0:43:06.040
<v Speaker 8>Now, Okay, I can't share the information with Tim Mitchell

0:43:06.040 --> 0:43:09.760
<v Speaker 8>anymore because he listens to it. He gets time players

0:43:09.840 --> 0:43:12.200
<v Speaker 8>or so gotta. I'm gonna try to avoid Tim Mitchell.

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:13.520
<v Speaker 8>His sounds scamy.

0:43:14.800 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. I've tried putting a few restraining orders on him,

0:43:16.960 --> 0:43:18.880
<v Speaker 4>and he just keeps violating them. It's just that he

0:43:18.920 --> 0:43:21.399
<v Speaker 4>doesn't care about the rule of law, doesn't care about

0:43:21.440 --> 0:43:24.520
<v Speaker 4>super coaches like you and I. He's just a rebel

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:25.880
<v Speaker 4>without a cause. That Tim Mitchell.

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:28.520
<v Speaker 8>He even said the other day to me, messaged me,

0:43:28.560 --> 0:43:31.640
<v Speaker 8>he said he was going to bring in McGovern and

0:43:31.640 --> 0:43:33.040
<v Speaker 8>he gave me a hard to take. Okay, so we

0:43:33.280 --> 0:43:34.920
<v Speaker 8>felt much chair and he said McGovern was going to

0:43:34.960 --> 0:43:36.400
<v Speaker 8>come in, but he didn't do it.

0:43:36.440 --> 0:43:39.080
<v Speaker 7>So I was, okay, yeah.

0:43:38.960 --> 0:43:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Don't don't look at his trades this week. I think, yeah,

0:43:41.239 --> 0:43:42.600
<v Speaker 2>he's high on the radar.

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:47.080
<v Speaker 1>This one. All right, there you go, that's Abs Magic

0:43:47.239 --> 0:43:50.359
<v Speaker 1>the Godfather. You can go check out his amazing work

0:43:50.400 --> 0:43:52.520
<v Speaker 1>on his channel as well. He does a great job.

0:43:52.600 --> 0:43:54.759
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for jumping on and you know,

0:43:55.320 --> 0:43:57.440
<v Speaker 1>just basically dumping in L's face for a little bit.

0:43:57.560 --> 0:44:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Being ranked one or two. Overall, I love this fantastic.

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:02.960
<v Speaker 4>Good luck for the run home ABS for all, well

0:44:02.960 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 4>except for our on.

0:44:05.880 --> 0:44:06.799
<v Speaker 1>Your boat. There we go.

0:44:06.960 --> 0:44:08.719
<v Speaker 7>Thank you, Thank you very much, gentlemen, thank you for

0:44:08.719 --> 0:44:09.479
<v Speaker 7>having me on the show.

0:44:14.000 --> 0:44:16.640
<v Speaker 1>All right. How good was that chat with his godfather Al?

0:44:16.880 --> 0:44:19.160
<v Speaker 1>That was awesome. He's taking you talk about like we

0:44:19.360 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 1>mentioned this earlier with the phantom about you know, strongly

0:44:22.560 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 1>getting a bath by Grundy. I feel like he's about

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to do the same to you. This is a bit worrisome.

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:28.080
<v Speaker 2>There's some very kind words there, but you know, he's

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 2>an absolute legend of the Supercoach community ABS.

0:44:31.239 --> 0:44:33.040
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, no, we all want to see him do well.

0:44:33.160 --> 0:44:35.840
<v Speaker 1>That's awesome, all right, speaking of other legends, let's do

0:44:36.040 --> 0:44:36.719
<v Speaker 1>stats with.

0:44:38.680 --> 0:44:40.600
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, just to have found a nice little juicy

0:44:40.640 --> 0:44:43.279
<v Speaker 2>stat and again all of these will be on at

0:44:43.280 --> 0:44:44.919
<v Speaker 2>code sports dot com, dot you and all the mass

0:44:44.920 --> 0:44:47.640
<v Speaker 2>heads in a very short time. With some more detail,

0:44:47.640 --> 0:44:49.160
<v Speaker 2>you can scroll through all the clubs and see all

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:52.040
<v Speaker 2>the CBA numbers. Center bounces obviously a huge stat that

0:44:52.120 --> 0:44:53.880
<v Speaker 2>is relevant for super Coach and the name that jumped

0:44:53.920 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 2>straight off the page when I looked at them this

0:44:55.600 --> 0:44:59.000
<v Speaker 2>week is Jack Steele. We know he was got some

0:44:59.080 --> 0:45:02.320
<v Speaker 2>attention from Jared Berry Tagger and we talked about that

0:45:02.400 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the tag, and one way potentially to

0:45:04.560 --> 0:45:06.680
<v Speaker 2>try and get him away from that was he actually

0:45:06.719 --> 0:45:08.080
<v Speaker 2>moved out of the senate square. It's been a lot

0:45:08.120 --> 0:45:09.799
<v Speaker 2>of the game in the second half, especially in the

0:45:09.800 --> 0:45:13.160
<v Speaker 2>forward line. Had a season low thirty nine percent center bounds.

0:45:13.160 --> 0:45:16.400
<v Speaker 2>As normally he's like an eighty ninety percent operator, so

0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 2>that was a very low number. Now it may have

0:45:18.120 --> 0:45:19.839
<v Speaker 2>just been the one off because of the tag, but

0:45:19.840 --> 0:45:22.200
<v Speaker 2>the worry is that Leam Henry went into the senate

0:45:22.239 --> 0:45:24.719
<v Speaker 2>bounces in the last quarter, he tended pretty much all

0:45:24.719 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 2>of them twenty three percent rise in CBA's for him.

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Not normally a guy that you see at the center bounce,

0:45:28.960 --> 0:45:31.440
<v Speaker 2>but it actually kind of worked like sin Kilda looked

0:45:31.560 --> 0:45:34.000
<v Speaker 2>quite good in the last quarter. So it makes me

0:45:34.040 --> 0:45:36.120
<v Speaker 2>a little bit nervous that Ross might think this is

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:38.759
<v Speaker 2>a tactic he could try again going forward, which is

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:41.640
<v Speaker 2>probably not what we want for Jack Steel supercerch numbers.

0:45:41.440 --> 0:45:43.520
<v Speaker 4>Jack still on the BI would you trade him out

0:45:43.560 --> 0:45:49.200
<v Speaker 4>this week? Maybe there's not a no coach, that's not

0:45:49.280 --> 0:45:50.520
<v Speaker 4>a no get trading.

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:53.319
<v Speaker 1>That was the longest pause before maybe ever as well.

0:45:53.360 --> 0:45:53.719
<v Speaker 1>It's like.

0:45:55.200 --> 0:45:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you'd have to have enough trades and everything, but

0:45:57.080 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 2>you could consider it. I mean it's hard going off

0:45:59.040 --> 0:46:01.239
<v Speaker 2>just that one little bit of sample size, but yeah,

0:46:01.280 --> 0:46:01.600
<v Speaker 2>it was.

0:46:02.440 --> 0:46:06.040
<v Speaker 1>They have some interesting numbers. All right, let's debut another

0:46:06.400 --> 0:46:11.160
<v Speaker 1>new segment. It's the No Go Zone Zone Zone. That's

0:46:11.200 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, my own little sort of one man sort

0:46:14.080 --> 0:46:16.880
<v Speaker 1>of effects board over here, the No Go Zone. Who

0:46:16.960 --> 0:46:20.840
<v Speaker 1>are we not touching for this run home in the

0:46:20.920 --> 0:46:23.799
<v Speaker 1>Super Coach season? Gentlemen? I will kick this if by

0:46:24.000 --> 0:46:26.640
<v Speaker 1>kick this off simply by saying Charlie Curnel and Harry mcguy.

0:46:26.640 --> 0:46:32.280
<v Speaker 1>They are very very interesting pods heading into the last stretch. I, however,

0:46:32.440 --> 0:46:35.040
<v Speaker 1>as a Carphon fan, don't want to touch either of

0:46:35.080 --> 0:46:39.240
<v Speaker 1>those two illustrious, fantastic gentlemen. Who should kick the blues

0:46:39.280 --> 0:46:40.000
<v Speaker 1>towards a flag?

0:46:40.840 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 4>Is that because you're superstitious or because you don't think

0:46:42.960 --> 0:46:44.160
<v Speaker 4>they'll be good at Supercoach?

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:46.759
<v Speaker 1>Why not both? Let's go. It's a bit of a

0:46:46.840 --> 0:46:49.279
<v Speaker 1>vibe because I feel like every time Charlie sort of

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 1>pops off, Harry might not be having a good game.

0:46:51.640 --> 0:46:53.879
<v Speaker 1>But then you can sort of flip both and they

0:46:54.640 --> 0:46:56.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of Essentially it's the roller coast. One might have

0:46:56.640 --> 0:46:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a good week, the other one might just not be

0:46:58.239 --> 0:47:00.839
<v Speaker 1>as good. Could you pick both? Could I play both

0:47:00.880 --> 0:47:04.000
<v Speaker 1>at the same time? Maybe not one on the bench

0:47:04.000 --> 0:47:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and one on the field.

0:47:05.080 --> 0:47:09.640
<v Speaker 4>That's best, the best some kind of loophole is, yeah,

0:47:09.640 --> 0:47:11.759
<v Speaker 4>it's best one where you have two of them and

0:47:11.760 --> 0:47:13.280
<v Speaker 4>you get the one best score.

0:47:13.440 --> 0:47:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Basically, I'm just looking at looking at the structure for

0:47:15.760 --> 0:47:18.359
<v Speaker 1>my tam I'm like Isaac ranking in two weeks time

0:47:18.440 --> 0:47:20.279
<v Speaker 1>is probably the better option, and that's basically where I'm at.

0:47:20.320 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 1>So I just don't want to touch the sort of

0:47:21.560 --> 0:47:24.600
<v Speaker 1>key position. Guys, we talked about Jesse Hogan earlier in

0:47:24.640 --> 0:47:26.279
<v Speaker 1>the season and that sort of you know, he's falling

0:47:26.280 --> 0:47:29.480
<v Speaker 1>off a cliff as well, like just tough, tough, tough sledding.

0:47:29.520 --> 0:47:31.399
<v Speaker 1>I think to have either of those, But al, what's

0:47:31.400 --> 0:47:32.560
<v Speaker 1>your no, that's fair enough.

0:47:32.760 --> 0:47:35.040
<v Speaker 2>The one I'm looking at this week or not looking at,

0:47:35.120 --> 0:47:39.000
<v Speaker 2>is Colby Mkircheer. I know there's a temptation there because

0:47:39.040 --> 0:47:42.280
<v Speaker 2>we know well he can score when he plays one.

0:47:42.400 --> 0:47:44.080
<v Speaker 2>The word is that he will be back potentially this

0:47:44.160 --> 0:47:46.719
<v Speaker 2>week for the Kangaroos. The price is great. Three seventy

0:47:46.840 --> 0:47:49.480
<v Speaker 2>nine k, still at a negative five break even. But

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:51.440
<v Speaker 2>I've already used three trades on him. I'm not going

0:47:51.440 --> 0:47:53.759
<v Speaker 2>to use another one. He's the number two draft pick.

0:47:53.840 --> 0:47:56.920
<v Speaker 2>North surely are going to be very careful with how

0:47:56.920 --> 0:47:58.920
<v Speaker 2>they manage him in that foot injury, which doesn't just

0:47:58.920 --> 0:48:01.120
<v Speaker 2>go away with a two or three week rests. So

0:48:01.520 --> 0:48:04.640
<v Speaker 2>every chance he's managed for one, two, three, four weeks

0:48:04.640 --> 0:48:06.960
<v Speaker 2>two knows him anymore for the rest of the season.

0:48:07.000 --> 0:48:09.160
<v Speaker 1>So he's not someone I'll be taking a risk on

0:48:09.480 --> 0:48:10.240
<v Speaker 1>nice one patch.

0:48:10.400 --> 0:48:16.000
<v Speaker 4>My no go zone is your beloved Connor Rosie is

0:48:16.040 --> 0:48:18.560
<v Speaker 4>looking very very cheap. Price has fallen off a cliff

0:48:19.000 --> 0:48:24.080
<v Speaker 4>after a few injury affected games. He's back in pog form.

0:48:24.239 --> 0:48:26.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to bar of him. Watched him on

0:48:26.080 --> 0:48:30.279
<v Speaker 4>the weekend. He just didn't look in it, didn't I

0:48:30.719 --> 0:48:33.319
<v Speaker 4>Maybe next week I've changed my team, maybe he comes

0:48:33.360 --> 0:48:35.279
<v Speaker 4>out shows that he just had a bit of rust

0:48:35.280 --> 0:48:38.760
<v Speaker 4>he needed to just burn off. This week. He's still

0:48:38.800 --> 0:48:42.200
<v Speaker 4>got a very big break even, still got more cash

0:48:42.200 --> 0:48:47.840
<v Speaker 4>to lose, not this week just didn't look anywhere near it.

0:48:47.840 --> 0:48:50.319
<v Speaker 1>It's also been the sort of query I've had about

0:48:50.400 --> 0:48:54.239
<v Speaker 1>rankin right, like I don't like soft tissue injuries for

0:48:54.360 --> 0:48:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the guys that he's sort are relying on. So Rankin's

0:48:56.320 --> 0:48:58.040
<v Speaker 1>coming back from him, but he looked pretty good against

0:48:58.040 --> 0:49:00.279
<v Speaker 1>the Swan's. He gets another week off now, so that's

0:49:00.320 --> 0:49:02.720
<v Speaker 1>one I'm at least vaguely confident in his sort of ability.

0:49:02.719 --> 0:49:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Whereas Rosie it's been so tumultuous. I guess the last

0:49:05.719 --> 0:49:08.080
<v Speaker 1>month for him that I'm like hands off until we

0:49:08.360 --> 0:49:10.920
<v Speaker 1>have like plenty l and the Port How far does

0:49:10.960 --> 0:49:12.239
<v Speaker 1>he have to drop before you bring him in, right,

0:49:12.280 --> 0:49:12.759
<v Speaker 1>that's the question.

0:49:13.200 --> 0:49:15.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I don't know. I think it would need to

0:49:15.160 --> 0:49:16.920
<v Speaker 4>be linked to form as well. Where I want to

0:49:17.000 --> 0:49:19.200
<v Speaker 4>I'd want to see something as well as the price

0:49:19.280 --> 0:49:21.680
<v Speaker 4>going just that little bit lower. So if I saw

0:49:21.680 --> 0:49:23.319
<v Speaker 4>something this week and he scored one hundred and ten,

0:49:23.640 --> 0:49:25.640
<v Speaker 4>maybe other than think about it next week. But at

0:49:25.640 --> 0:49:28.480
<v Speaker 4>this stage, certainly I think there's more cash to lose.

0:49:28.800 --> 0:49:31.240
<v Speaker 4>And the other factor is that you know, Port's midfield

0:49:31.239 --> 0:49:32.959
<v Speaker 4>has learned to live without him for the last month,

0:49:34.120 --> 0:49:36.480
<v Speaker 4>and you know they're you know that they'll take time

0:49:36.520 --> 0:49:39.759
<v Speaker 4>to women back in. Adelade's forward line hasn't worked for

0:49:39.800 --> 0:49:42.160
<v Speaker 4>the last month with that rank and now he's back

0:49:42.239 --> 0:49:45.759
<v Speaker 4>and he's slotted straight back into that hole, whereas the

0:49:46.120 --> 0:49:49.839
<v Speaker 4>Kinnie Rosie shaped peg isn't quite fitting into the port

0:49:49.920 --> 0:49:54.120
<v Speaker 4>midfield quite as nicely at the moment. Maybe it'll take time.

0:49:54.200 --> 0:49:54.560
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:49:54.719 --> 0:49:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, that's a beautiful set of metaphors. I enjoyed that

0:49:57.880 --> 0:50:00.400
<v Speaker 1>quick fire around. Let's do it? Can you trade them on? Thereby?

0:50:01.200 --> 0:50:05.400
<v Speaker 1>We've already answered this one. Jack Steele, apparently El says maybe.

0:50:05.400 --> 0:50:07.439
<v Speaker 4>That pause was twenty seconds too short.

0:50:08.400 --> 0:50:09.320
<v Speaker 1>How do you feel about it?

0:50:09.440 --> 0:50:09.640
<v Speaker 8>Patch?

0:50:09.960 --> 0:50:13.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, look, if you need to trade someone to

0:50:13.480 --> 0:50:17.440
<v Speaker 4>get to Adeen, sure, sure.

0:50:17.480 --> 0:50:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, don't worry me. Everything Ross worries me.

0:50:21.080 --> 0:50:23.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I don't think it's yes. I think you can

0:50:23.440 --> 0:50:23.600
<v Speaker 4>do it.

0:50:23.960 --> 0:50:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Dawson.

0:50:24.840 --> 0:50:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Hell, I don't have Dawson, but if I did, I

0:50:28.160 --> 0:50:30.839
<v Speaker 2>think you would definitely enjoy the week off. He said,

0:50:30.960 --> 0:50:33.359
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a sore foot, And you know he's

0:50:33.440 --> 0:50:35.600
<v Speaker 2>the obvious one that taggers go to winnif Franken could

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:39.040
<v Speaker 2>maybe get some attention when they come up against all

0:50:39.040 --> 0:50:40.719
<v Speaker 2>these guys that we've been talking about. But yeah, another

0:50:40.760 --> 0:50:44.080
<v Speaker 2>one who has been a bit underwhelming. But I think

0:50:45.239 --> 0:50:47.640
<v Speaker 2>when the good scores come, you'd be pretty annoyed if

0:50:47.640 --> 0:50:48.279
<v Speaker 2>you trade him out.

0:50:48.360 --> 0:50:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm holding Dawson fifty five seventy nine in the

0:50:51.520 --> 0:50:52.280
<v Speaker 1>last three weeks.

0:50:52.680 --> 0:50:52.919
<v Speaker 6>Rough.

0:50:54.239 --> 0:50:56.839
<v Speaker 1>What about Dylan Moore? This is a tough question because

0:50:56.880 --> 0:50:58.480
<v Speaker 1>he's still he had a pretty rough week this week.

0:50:58.520 --> 0:51:00.960
<v Speaker 1>We've still rose in price because of his break even

0:51:01.040 --> 0:51:03.799
<v Speaker 1>so strange one, Dylan Moore, what do you think?

0:51:04.320 --> 0:51:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think this is really one for pets because

0:51:05.680 --> 0:51:10.319
<v Speaker 2>I think you are a Dylan he said, I think

0:51:10.360 --> 0:51:12.360
<v Speaker 2>one score over one hundred, but it was about what

0:51:12.520 --> 0:51:15.799
<v Speaker 2>a score it was our I mean, given the state

0:51:15.880 --> 0:51:17.439
<v Speaker 2>of the forward line, weird.

0:51:17.760 --> 0:51:20.279
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, who are you trading him to? Is my question? Like,

0:51:20.440 --> 0:51:22.759
<v Speaker 4>if you found someone that's better than Dylan Moore that's

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:26.360
<v Speaker 4>playing this week, sure, please tell me who it is.

0:51:28.080 --> 0:51:29.920
<v Speaker 4>I think you know he'll He'll still have a lot

0:51:29.960 --> 0:51:33.120
<v Speaker 4>of seventies and eighties, hopefully that's counteracted by the big scores.

0:51:33.120 --> 0:51:35.400
<v Speaker 4>Hopefully he drops a few more of them as Hawthorne

0:51:35.400 --> 0:51:40.920
<v Speaker 4>improves and Can continues going. Well, I'm holding, But if

0:51:40.960 --> 0:51:43.960
<v Speaker 4>you've found a better option in like a at the

0:51:44.000 --> 0:51:47.400
<v Speaker 4>bottom of a bag somewhere, go for it, man, Like

0:51:47.600 --> 0:51:48.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't.

0:51:47.880 --> 0:51:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Know, all right? Is Tom Green at top eight midfielder

0:51:50.400 --> 0:51:52.840
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the season. Oh god, this breaks

0:51:52.920 --> 0:51:55.759
<v Speaker 1>my heart. Nope, it doesn't feel like he's going to

0:51:55.800 --> 0:51:56.719
<v Speaker 1>be is it Patch?

0:51:56.880 --> 0:51:56.920
<v Speaker 6>No?

0:51:57.440 --> 0:51:59.200
<v Speaker 4>No, But I can't trade him because I don't have

0:51:59.239 --> 0:52:03.160
<v Speaker 4>enough trades, so stuck with him. I still think he's

0:52:03.360 --> 0:52:05.239
<v Speaker 4>I think he's got all the building walks to be

0:52:05.320 --> 0:52:07.600
<v Speaker 4>a very good midfielder. It's just not clicking.

0:52:08.000 --> 0:52:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Al he's currently just checking this the thirtieth ran to

0:52:11.239 --> 0:52:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Midfielder super coach after starting the season with three scores

0:52:14.600 --> 0:52:15.520
<v Speaker 2>about on hundred and fifty.

0:52:15.560 --> 0:52:18.120
<v Speaker 4>So remember when people were paying six hundred.

0:52:17.880 --> 0:52:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Fifty with him? What is his christ?

0:52:22.680 --> 0:52:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Now he's four fifty and he's still coming down. So

0:52:27.000 --> 0:52:30.240
<v Speaker 2>I still I think he bounces back surely at some stage.

0:52:30.680 --> 0:52:32.759
<v Speaker 1>Twenty of the pill this week, and it's more about

0:52:32.800 --> 0:52:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the efficiency. And I think now that Kelly's back and

0:52:35.760 --> 0:52:38.239
<v Speaker 1>now the Buckley's back, can Iglio down the road as well.

0:52:38.320 --> 0:52:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Essentially we'll come back in. It's still just going to

0:52:40.719 --> 0:52:42.600
<v Speaker 1>be a rough couple of weeks. I reckon and hope,

0:52:42.800 --> 0:52:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Like the thing is he's that good at times or

0:52:44.600 --> 0:52:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you're like the fingers are just crossed.

0:52:46.400 --> 0:52:48.319
<v Speaker 4>It's like I can't do much about it, and it's

0:52:48.440 --> 0:52:50.400
<v Speaker 4>just stuff isn't going right as well. He had a

0:52:50.520 --> 0:52:54.160
<v Speaker 4>There was a kick inside fifty on Sunday where the

0:52:54.239 --> 0:52:56.319
<v Speaker 4>ball came in and landed in his lap. He took

0:52:56.360 --> 0:52:58.920
<v Speaker 4>the mark twenty five minutes out directly in front of

0:52:59.120 --> 0:53:01.880
<v Speaker 4>and the free kick was given to the guy standing

0:53:01.920 --> 0:53:05.440
<v Speaker 4>next twim, his teammate Toby Green, who then went back

0:53:05.520 --> 0:53:07.879
<v Speaker 4>and kicked a point because he kicked five of them.

0:53:07.960 --> 0:53:10.480
<v Speaker 4>And it's just like, well, that should be a Tom

0:53:10.520 --> 0:53:12.399
<v Speaker 4>greenshot On goal. That should be a Tom Green goal.

0:53:12.520 --> 0:53:16.479
<v Speaker 4>But it said, it's not alright, it's just anyway, quick

0:53:16.520 --> 0:53:16.919
<v Speaker 4>fire around.

0:53:17.000 --> 0:53:19.719
<v Speaker 1>He said, how many trades we got left patch.

0:53:21.000 --> 0:53:26.839
<v Speaker 4>No comment? Four? Four four after using three this week?

0:53:26.880 --> 0:53:27.399
<v Speaker 4>It's four.

0:53:27.880 --> 0:53:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Al that's low. You've got nine coming into the round,

0:53:30.400 --> 0:53:33.759
<v Speaker 1>but probably be seven after this week. I think I've

0:53:33.800 --> 0:53:35.800
<v Speaker 1>got eight and we'll talk about that in a second.

0:53:35.880 --> 0:53:37.800
<v Speaker 4>Would either of you gentlemen be interested.

0:53:40.440 --> 0:53:41.919
<v Speaker 1>I've said I'll do a lot of things to twenty

0:53:41.960 --> 0:53:45.719
<v Speaker 1>dollars a boost or no boosts. I've actually still got

0:53:45.760 --> 0:53:48.040
<v Speaker 1>my boost left, and because I didn't end up using

0:53:48.040 --> 0:53:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it last week, I might use it just to get

0:53:49.600 --> 0:53:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the depending on the butter's result, like if he actually

0:53:52.160 --> 0:53:54.320
<v Speaker 1>gets rubbed out, I might need to use the boost,

0:53:54.440 --> 0:53:57.080
<v Speaker 1>use the four. Knock myself down to four remaining trades

0:53:57.080 --> 0:53:59.200
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the season, just to sort of

0:53:59.239 --> 0:54:02.000
<v Speaker 1>give myself one last little hope. And that's all it's

0:54:02.040 --> 0:54:04.719
<v Speaker 1>going to be. So may as well. But everyone else

0:54:04.840 --> 0:54:05.840
<v Speaker 1>is out of Boost Ocean.

0:54:05.960 --> 0:54:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Ah, yes, absolutely, and the boost. You can't take the

0:54:08.560 --> 0:54:10.759
<v Speaker 2>boost with you, like if you it over next year,

0:54:10.840 --> 0:54:12.600
<v Speaker 2>come on out. Your trades end up at one or

0:54:12.640 --> 0:54:15.359
<v Speaker 2>two trades, you can't then activate a boost again.

0:54:15.400 --> 0:54:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to help you, sir. All right, captain's call.

0:54:17.600 --> 0:54:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Who are you looking at this week? It is a

0:54:18.840 --> 0:54:20.200
<v Speaker 1>bit of a rough week. I'm probably just going to

0:54:20.320 --> 0:54:22.360
<v Speaker 1>roll the dice on Sam Walsh on Friday night against

0:54:22.360 --> 0:54:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the Geelong Cats. He had one hundred and four against

0:54:25.160 --> 0:54:26.759
<v Speaker 1>them a month plus ago when they're at the g

0:54:27.200 --> 0:54:29.080
<v Speaker 1>but last year ripped off one fifty seven, and I

0:54:29.160 --> 0:54:30.799
<v Speaker 1>think that's kind of the interesting one. Depending on how

0:54:30.840 --> 0:54:34.839
<v Speaker 1>Geelong and looking Carlton had been playing very well, Sam

0:54:34.880 --> 0:54:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Walsh might just sort of give you that random one

0:54:37.160 --> 0:54:39.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty out of nowhere and you're like, fingers crossed, let's go.

0:54:39.560 --> 0:54:41.640
<v Speaker 1>And then probably the captain thing was a tough one

0:54:41.680 --> 0:54:44.800
<v Speaker 1>this week. I might just go into Sorong on Sunday

0:54:45.640 --> 0:54:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and sort of just hope for the best with Frio

0:54:47.880 --> 0:54:52.800
<v Speaker 1>at home. I believe, yes against the Sons, who not

0:54:53.000 --> 0:54:55.200
<v Speaker 1>exactly known for the tagging. A lot of back and forth,

0:54:55.280 --> 0:54:56.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of big schools in that one. So Flanders has

0:54:57.000 --> 0:54:59.000
<v Speaker 1>also got a really big projection in that game. I

0:54:59.040 --> 0:55:03.480
<v Speaker 1>think he's at one thirty one ten projected, but I

0:55:03.520 --> 0:55:05.239
<v Speaker 1>think Sorong is due a bit of a bounce back,

0:55:05.280 --> 0:55:06.960
<v Speaker 1>so especially at home, I don't mind that we know

0:55:07.040 --> 0:55:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that he goes bang it opts, so I'll see what happens.

0:55:09.400 --> 0:55:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Patch your vibes.

0:55:11.719 --> 0:55:14.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I also don't like this week all that much.

0:55:14.280 --> 0:55:16.440
<v Speaker 4>I know we spoke about Segma facing a lot of

0:55:16.440 --> 0:55:19.320
<v Speaker 4>tag on the run. Home Eagles, as far as I'm aware,

0:55:19.640 --> 0:55:22.719
<v Speaker 4>don't really tag, so he could be one to get

0:55:22.760 --> 0:55:26.400
<v Speaker 4>off the chain on Sunday. I don't have him, so

0:55:26.600 --> 0:55:28.800
<v Speaker 4>I won't be able to v see him. Whilsh's on

0:55:28.880 --> 0:55:32.319
<v Speaker 4>the list. Houston will probably get more attention this week,

0:55:32.440 --> 0:55:37.960
<v Speaker 4>but maybe Zorko has another good efforts seagulling. Those two

0:55:38.000 --> 0:55:43.200
<v Speaker 4>are being considered. Brodie Grundy is playing in Sydney. It's

0:55:43.239 --> 0:55:47.759
<v Speaker 4>not at the SCG, but he's in Sydney, but Luke

0:55:47.840 --> 0:55:49.520
<v Speaker 4>Ryan is probably the one I'll end up with with

0:55:49.640 --> 0:55:52.200
<v Speaker 4>the captain on for that late Sunday game one.

0:55:52.360 --> 0:55:54.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think he's probably a safe backup. No de gos,

0:55:54.920 --> 0:55:57.920
<v Speaker 2>no bond this week obviously make things a little bit challenging.

0:55:58.000 --> 0:56:01.359
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you've got Max Gorn again, Tristan Cherry who's had

0:56:01.480 --> 0:56:03.920
<v Speaker 2>a really good year, or Grundy as you said against

0:56:03.960 --> 0:56:08.560
<v Speaker 2>the Giants, probably safeish options. I think if you've got

0:56:08.640 --> 0:56:10.839
<v Speaker 2>a you know, one fifteen or one twenty from your VC,

0:56:10.880 --> 0:56:12.759
<v Speaker 2>you'd probably bank it this week. I think this an

0:56:12.800 --> 0:56:15.560
<v Speaker 2>obvious early score that could go up. I don't mind Welsh,

0:56:15.640 --> 0:56:17.840
<v Speaker 2>but I think speaking of Taggers, I think Marc Ocnnor

0:56:17.920 --> 0:56:20.360
<v Speaker 2>played in that game earlier in the year and followed

0:56:20.400 --> 0:56:22.239
<v Speaker 2>him around, so maybe see what the teams look like.

0:56:22.360 --> 0:56:24.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah on Friday night. But yeah, it's a bit of

0:56:24.239 --> 0:56:27.120
<v Speaker 1>a tricky week. I think it is right. It's a

0:56:27.400 --> 0:56:31.080
<v Speaker 1>name of games, though very quickly some name games. Did

0:56:31.160 --> 0:56:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Dusty Ton up this week?

0:56:33.840 --> 0:56:35.479
<v Speaker 2>I assume he did. I mean I sort of tuned

0:56:35.520 --> 0:56:37.839
<v Speaker 2>out after that goal about five minutes into the game.

0:56:38.600 --> 0:56:40.240
<v Speaker 1>He did you continue to pace? Correct?

0:56:40.840 --> 0:56:42.839
<v Speaker 4>It was a linear just like he had twenty six

0:56:42.920 --> 0:56:44.759
<v Speaker 4>goals at half time and it just kept going.

0:56:45.200 --> 0:56:48.359
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty much by memory. He ended up on fifty six.

0:56:48.480 --> 0:56:50.960
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think I won that one this week.

0:56:51.080 --> 0:56:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Sex and with Will powellback, interesting over under eighty what

0:56:54.280 --> 0:56:55.080
<v Speaker 1>are we saying there? Eh?

0:56:55.640 --> 0:56:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I thought I'll just put this on the on

0:56:57.880 --> 0:57:00.719
<v Speaker 2>the agenda for a little bit of discussion because Will

0:57:00.800 --> 0:57:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Power has been out for five weeks. In that time,

0:57:02.800 --> 0:57:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Sexton has been a fantastic pick up, averaging roughly ninety

0:57:06.160 --> 0:57:09.000
<v Speaker 2>five points. But they basically played the same role, and

0:57:09.120 --> 0:57:11.279
<v Speaker 2>earlier in the year when Power was there, Sexton wasn't

0:57:11.280 --> 0:57:11.960
<v Speaker 2>scoring very well.

0:57:13.719 --> 0:57:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Again, sure, yeah, but if he does keep playing, how

0:57:17.560 --> 0:57:18.439
<v Speaker 1>do we think he goes?

0:57:19.800 --> 0:57:22.280
<v Speaker 4>Probably not great, Probably not great.

0:57:22.360 --> 0:57:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not well. He's had five straight games over the

0:57:25.320 --> 0:57:27.360
<v Speaker 1>top of eighty, so he's gone eighty two one, eighteen

0:57:27.400 --> 0:57:29.960
<v Speaker 1>eighty six, one hundred and eighty seven. I still have

0:57:30.040 --> 0:57:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of faith in Sexton, so I will

0:57:32.640 --> 0:57:33.160
<v Speaker 1>go the over.

0:57:33.720 --> 0:57:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, I'll take the umbers. Ideally, I think

0:57:36.360 --> 0:57:38.200
<v Speaker 2>if I can make my trades work, I'll keep him

0:57:38.920 --> 0:57:41.560
<v Speaker 2>as that extra bench player who could potentially swing to

0:57:41.600 --> 0:57:43.320
<v Speaker 2>the back line as well with that DPP.

0:57:43.480 --> 0:57:45.880
<v Speaker 1>But between him and Fisher. It's a really handy so, yeah,

0:57:45.880 --> 0:57:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you've got both of them easy.

0:57:48.920 --> 0:57:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Will Dawson on the bench is another one there, so

0:57:51.160 --> 0:57:53.560
<v Speaker 2>that could work out quite well if he stays in

0:57:53.640 --> 0:57:56.360
<v Speaker 2>the team and scores. Okay, if he starts scoring thirties again.

0:57:58.520 --> 0:58:00.919
<v Speaker 1>Over run it for the highest score of this round. Patch.

0:58:01.040 --> 0:58:03.680
<v Speaker 1>What do you think over under two two hundred and fifty?

0:58:05.760 --> 0:58:08.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, lately we've seen most people scoring about two thousand.

0:58:08.920 --> 0:58:10.800
<v Speaker 4>The top score for this week was in the two thousand,

0:58:10.880 --> 0:58:15.000
<v Speaker 4>three hundreds, which was just insane. It'll it always clicks

0:58:15.040 --> 0:58:17.240
<v Speaker 4>for one person, and I reckon there's someone out there

0:58:17.280 --> 0:58:20.080
<v Speaker 4>that has built a team for this week because they

0:58:20.160 --> 0:58:23.400
<v Speaker 4>want that cash, and I reckon it'll be over two

0:58:23.440 --> 0:58:26.240
<v Speaker 4>hundred and fifty, despite no bond, despite no decas, despite

0:58:26.280 --> 0:58:29.720
<v Speaker 4>no rookie es, despite just nothing going right for this week.

0:58:30.440 --> 0:58:32.560
<v Speaker 4>It'll life finds a way, James.

0:58:32.720 --> 0:58:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you the lock of this week is that

0:58:34.720 --> 0:58:37.680
<v Speaker 1>my score will be underd and fifty.

0:58:38.320 --> 0:58:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Yours could be the team. It could actually where the

0:58:41.520 --> 0:58:43.720
<v Speaker 2>planets align. I think the person who won the weekly

0:58:43.800 --> 0:58:46.000
<v Speaker 2>prize this week was ranked about eighty thousand overall.

0:58:46.080 --> 0:58:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Song of Kin. This is great, right, you're due.

0:58:49.880 --> 0:58:51.880
<v Speaker 4>If a person has ever been you, I've.

0:58:51.800 --> 0:58:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Never been watching al What do you reckon over under

0:58:55.520 --> 0:58:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the twenty two hundred and fifty?

0:58:56.920 --> 0:59:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, some someone always seems too it right. It's crazy

0:59:01.240 --> 0:59:02.920
<v Speaker 2>how it happens. But I think it is going to

0:59:02.960 --> 0:59:05.520
<v Speaker 2>be a tricky week. You know, managed to get over

0:59:05.600 --> 0:59:07.080
<v Speaker 2>two thousand in the buy a rounds so far, but

0:59:08.200 --> 0:59:09.640
<v Speaker 2>maybe nineteen hundred or something this week.

0:59:09.680 --> 0:59:11.040
<v Speaker 1>He's probably going to be a score.

0:59:11.400 --> 0:59:13.240
<v Speaker 4>If I scrape past nineteen hundred, that will be a

0:59:13.320 --> 0:59:14.520
<v Speaker 4>static nice.

0:59:14.600 --> 0:59:17.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, really quickly Monday moves before we go, what

0:59:17.200 --> 0:59:19.640
<v Speaker 1>is your Monday trade? I? As I mentioned, I don't

0:59:19.680 --> 0:59:20.880
<v Speaker 1>know if I'm going to make one. I've got the

0:59:20.880 --> 0:59:24.160
<v Speaker 1>eight remaining trades. If I've got nineteen, I might go

0:59:24.280 --> 0:59:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the exact opposite way and use four with my boost

0:59:27.720 --> 0:59:30.720
<v Speaker 1>space four is basically the problem is I would rather

0:59:30.920 --> 0:59:33.040
<v Speaker 1>wait and just bring in rank in next week and

0:59:33.120 --> 0:59:36.760
<v Speaker 1>then sort of go from there. But with the opportunity

0:59:36.760 --> 0:59:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to use four trades, maybe I can get one more

0:59:38.960 --> 0:59:42.280
<v Speaker 1>double upgrade in there somehow, but I don't think I'll

0:59:42.320 --> 0:59:44.120
<v Speaker 1>end up with the cash to do four. So the

0:59:44.400 --> 0:59:47.360
<v Speaker 1>ideas would literally be to probably move on from Fraser

0:59:47.640 --> 0:59:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and from Sullivan. The other thing is also I still

0:59:51.960 --> 0:59:54.320
<v Speaker 1>have lost in in the back line, so it might

0:59:54.400 --> 0:59:56.560
<v Speaker 1>be if he's part of the four person trade, he

0:59:56.680 --> 0:59:59.320
<v Speaker 1>might be in there. So yeah, it's very up in

0:59:59.360 --> 1:00:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the air of the moment. My initial vibe is to

1:00:01.320 --> 1:00:01.720
<v Speaker 1>not trade.

1:00:01.920 --> 1:00:03.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I got those sort of itchy feet

1:00:03.480 --> 1:00:05.160
<v Speaker 2>last week and I didn't want to wait. And now

1:00:05.160 --> 1:00:07.320
<v Speaker 2>I look back at it and think, well, probably gained

1:00:07.320 --> 1:00:09.120
<v Speaker 2>me ten or fifteen points, and if I had have waited,

1:00:09.160 --> 1:00:11.320
<v Speaker 2>I might have got the player that I actually preferred.

1:00:11.680 --> 1:00:14.040
<v Speaker 2>But it just depends because Clark obviously didn't have a

1:00:14.080 --> 1:00:15.840
<v Speaker 2>great round. If you'd have scored on hundred and twenty

1:00:16.400 --> 1:00:18.360
<v Speaker 2>would have been the best move. So I think same

1:00:18.440 --> 1:00:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Fraser and Sullivan. For me, I just need someone who

1:00:21.400 --> 1:00:23.880
<v Speaker 2>I can down great. I need to really downgrade Sullivan

1:00:23.920 --> 1:00:25.880
<v Speaker 2>in the midfield so then I can turn Fraser into

1:00:26.600 --> 1:00:30.440
<v Speaker 2>a premium forward, probably Charlie Curno. So if there's a

1:00:30.560 --> 1:00:33.280
<v Speaker 2>rookie a midfielder out there, someone let me know. Otherwise

1:00:33.320 --> 1:00:36.080
<v Speaker 2>it might be one of these dead rookies who maybe

1:00:36.080 --> 1:00:38.800
<v Speaker 2>has some DPP attached that I can sit there and

1:00:38.960 --> 1:00:41.520
<v Speaker 2>move around and hopefully not get burned by the fact

1:00:41.560 --> 1:00:42.160
<v Speaker 2>that they are playing.

1:00:42.600 --> 1:00:46.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I am trading in a dead rookie at this stage.

1:00:46.160 --> 1:00:48.000
<v Speaker 4>I've committed to it because it gives me just enough

1:00:48.080 --> 1:00:50.440
<v Speaker 4>cash to trade up Twelie at Yow in the back

1:00:50.520 --> 1:00:52.600
<v Speaker 4>line and up to Charlie Curno in the forward line

1:00:52.680 --> 1:00:54.480
<v Speaker 4>Charlie Curno on the bench, as I've spoken about a

1:00:54.480 --> 1:00:57.400
<v Speaker 4>little bit. So I can then come end of years

1:00:57.720 --> 1:01:02.080
<v Speaker 4>try and loop Kurno with or with Fisher, with a

1:01:02.120 --> 1:01:05.440
<v Speaker 4>few other guys potentially in the midfield with Grain, depending

1:01:05.520 --> 1:01:09.600
<v Speaker 4>on swings and roundabouts and loops. So that's the plan

1:01:10.440 --> 1:01:12.560
<v Speaker 4>which gives me eighteen this week, and if zach Butter's

1:01:12.880 --> 1:01:18.080
<v Speaker 4>is suspended, I will have to just do it all again.

1:01:18.240 --> 1:01:23.360
<v Speaker 4>All right, I will cry so so loudly nice anyway,

1:01:23.440 --> 1:01:28.320
<v Speaker 4>So that's my plan. Please let it come to fruition.

1:01:28.560 --> 1:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>That noise you just heard the full body sobs of

1:01:31.200 --> 1:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>one patch.

1:01:32.440 --> 1:01:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Just realize that trade that I was discussing would lead

1:01:34.840 --> 1:01:36.640
<v Speaker 2>me about one hundred and thirty grand in the bank

1:01:36.760 --> 1:01:40.120
<v Speaker 2>and might have a trade or two more than you guys.

1:01:40.160 --> 1:01:42.360
<v Speaker 2>So could I use the third one to turn a

1:01:43.480 --> 1:01:44.480
<v Speaker 2>steal into.

1:01:47.800 --> 1:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Ready attorney abig spender. All right, that's it for the

1:01:53.000 --> 1:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Round fifteen preview of AFL Super Coach. Though of course

1:01:55.640 --> 1:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>remember to subscribe to Supercoach Plus to take your game

1:01:58.240 --> 1:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to the next level. Follow all things codes sports and

1:02:00.280 --> 1:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the latest AFL Super Coach news and Annella Sis. If

1:02:03.320 --> 1:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>you haven't already, please leave a rating and review on

1:02:06.480 --> 1:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple Spotify, subscribe co Sports on YouTube all the good

1:02:09.200 --> 1:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff there to get notified whenever a new episode drops.

1:02:11.760 --> 1:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>It's very simple, it's very easy, it's very good. You

1:02:15.160 --> 1:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>can also get all the around, all the news and

1:02:17.080 --> 1:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>fun gear, all your game previews, et cetera with the

1:02:20.160 --> 1:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>AFL Today Show and thanks to.

1:02:22.320 --> 1:02:26.720
<v Speaker 4>Patch, thanks to everyone else carrying me along.

1:02:26.680 --> 1:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to Well, thank you James, and especially thanks to

1:02:29.440 --> 1:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>our guest as that's right, the Godfather and Phantom both.

1:02:33.920 --> 1:02:38.040
<v Speaker 4>That was very very fun remember him and producer.

1:02:37.760 --> 1:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Homie for stepping in today as well. Very handy. All right,

1:02:40.080 --> 1:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>have a great week and happy super Coaching