WEBVTT - Your next favourite podcast

0:00:01.240 --> 0:00:01.759
<v Speaker 1>We've closed.

0:00:01.760 --> 0:00:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Are you ready? Okay?

0:00:03.720 --> 0:00:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Great?

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 3>If you're anything like me, sometimes you'll look at your

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 3>list of regular podcasts and think I hate all these

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 3>shows except the Front. Of course, when that happens to me,

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:24.479
<v Speaker 3>I turn for advice to Kristen Amiot, who sits next

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 3>to me at work and is the producer of the Front.

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 3>She also happens to be a bona fide podcast expert.

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 3>She writes our podcast a review column in The Australian

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 3>every Saturday, and today she joins me to talk about

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:41.240
<v Speaker 3>the best podcasts of twenty twenty four and the best

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 3>of all time. What were the big trends do you

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 3>think in podcasting in twenty twenty four?

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Twenty twenty four was the year that podcasts really emerged

0:00:54.400 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>as a bona fide political force. I think that's significant

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:07.320
<v Speaker 1>because podcasts pop culture adjacency, I think has caused them

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to be discounted by traditional media, but also to be

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:14.759
<v Speaker 1>lumped in with social media in the sense that there

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>was a belief for a very long time that anybody

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>could whack on a voice memo and call it a podcast.

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>We do know that podcasts are an incredibly intimate medium.

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>You're quite literally in people's ears. You're with them while

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>they're gardening or cooking or doing the school drop off.

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>And we know that people retain and comprehend information differently,

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily better, but differently when they listen to a podcast.

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>All of those things are the reason that we saw

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>podcasts in particular have such a significant impact or presence

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>in the recent US election. We saw Donald Trump on

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Joe Rogan's podcast, which has been and still is one

0:01:57.040 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest podcasts in the world.

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 4>All right for Roland, here we go.

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>We saw Kamla Harris appear on Alex Cooper's podcast, called

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Her Daddy, Daddy, Madam Vice President Alex welcome to call

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>her daddy. It is good to be with you. And

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that has perpetuated a really interesting conversation I think about

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>who gets to be in the media, who gets to

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>participate in politics, and curiosity around why these particular titles

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 1>resonate with such a huge number of people to the

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>point where they are arguably having an impact on the

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>democratic process.

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 3>In the evolution from radio to podcasting, it seemed like

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 3>everything was going to be a bit more intentional. You know,

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 3>you've made the choice to click on a podcast rather

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 3>than the radio just kind of wittering on in the background.

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>It would be that.

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 3>We were all choosing to listen to things that were

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 3>created just for us, and it was full of great content.

0:02:56.680 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 3>In fact, I think the Joe Rogan influence has been

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 3>that some podcasts are very bloated. You know, there's a

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:06.359
<v Speaker 3>lot of just chit chat, particularly in some of the

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 3>famous Australian podcasts hosted by women.

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I must say it's filler in your Labia Majora.

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 3>They just put where they're kind of talking about their

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 3>vaginas for an hour and a half.

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 1>And it's to rejuvenate the.

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 3>Vulva without I would think any kind of journalistic imperative.

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's intriguing, isn't it.

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 2>What is that?

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 3>Is it sort of comfort food for the audience?

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 1>I think. So there's something that people say about podcasts

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and about their particular effectiveness and their ability to engage people,

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>which is that a lot of people listen, as I said,

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>when they're gardening, cooking, cleaning, and they say, that's because

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you've got busy, hands free mind. Television, I think is

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>going through a similar moment in that there is the

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>rise of something called ambient TV, which is you know

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>your Emily empois you pop it on, you can look

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and scroll on your phone for three hours and still

0:03:57.360 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>not miss a single thing that happens in that show.

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>So perhaps that's what people are kind of engaging in,

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>is feeling maybe less alone, feeling like you have company.

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>And maybe it's not the way that they're talking about it,

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>or even what they're talking about. It's just having a

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>voice that you relate to, that is there playing while

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 1>you are going about your life.

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 3>That has now become so ubiquitous that now there's a

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 3>trend for not doing that. Dudes on planes doing what

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 3>they call raw dogging, which is just kind of staring

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 3>at the seat in front of you. And while hot

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 3>girl walk was an earlier TikTok trend, now there's a

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:33.839
<v Speaker 3>trend to be a hot girl out for a walk,

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 3>not listening to a podcast.

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 4>I've started going on what I call silent walks, and

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 4>that's basically where I go for a walk. I'm listening

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 4>to my surroundings and I'm not constantly listening to a

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 4>podcast or music or on a call with someone.

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>As a person who if I'm not working on a podcast,

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm listening to a podcast, and when I finished listening

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to a podcast I'm writing about a podcast that sounds

0:04:58.040 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>like my nightmare. I'm one of the people who love

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to have something playing when I'm just living life.

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 3>I would love to just get into the ambient ones,

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 3>but I find myself listening to ones that I feel

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 3>are going to improve me in some way about history

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 3>or cooking or whatever, and I'm constantly hitting the fifteen

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 3>seconds back button.

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes, right, you're kind of having the audiobook experience.

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 3>It always amazes me with say, our audience for the

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Bromwin podcast, which we've both worked on, Headley Thomas's investigation

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 3>into a missing woman, how many people tell us that

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:33.359
<v Speaker 3>they listen while they're falling asleep because Headley's voice is

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 3>kind of soothing. But yet they're also paying a lot

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 3>of attention to the detail, aren't I.

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 1>We have a Facebook group where there's I think now

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>over twenty two thousand people, and the questions that people

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 1>are asking in there, We've had moments where we've gone, oh, actually,

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a really amazing observation and yes, in the same

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>breath saying oh, I heard this while I was listening

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to it on the third go as I was falling asleep.

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.359
<v Speaker 1>It's maybe that unique ability of podcasts to create this

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>community and for people to feel like they're participating in

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>it when they are just relaxing and going to sleep.

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>But I did have a funny conversation with Headley recently

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>where he had observed that people say this to him,

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that he puts them to sleep, and he was having

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a night where he was struggling to get to sleep himself,

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and so I thought, I'll listen to this edit that's

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 1>come in from our brilliant engineer, A Slade Gibson, and

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>he said I was out like a light in about

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 1>five minutes. So there's something to it if even Headley

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>is putting himself to sleep.

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Coming up the podcast power player who's got big ambitions

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 3>in old school media. Kristen, You've listened to an awful

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 3>lot of podcasts in your life and in twenty twenty four.

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going to go through some of the big

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 3>categories and I'm going to ask you what's your best

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 3>ever and what's the best of twenty twenty thought.

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with true crime.

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 3>This statement is as best as I can remember. One

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 3>of the best I've ever listened to is sweet Bobby.

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 2>This story the one that you're about to hear. Thank you,

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:18.239
<v Speaker 2>it's a love story.

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 3>I meant it from the bottom of my heart. That

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 3>was Tortoise Media's investigation into what had happened to a

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 3>young english woman when a romance had apparently gone really

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 3>badly wrong. The twists and turns in that one were

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 3>absolutely amazing. I won't ruin it for the audience, but

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 3>it took you to places that we didn't expect to go.

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 3>Tortoise Media is quite remarkable, aren't they.

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>They are. They're really emerged as a power player in podcasts,

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and yes, I would rank Sweet Bobby as probably my

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>favorite true crime podcast of all time. As you said,

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>their ability to take you on this journey and to

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>do it really sensitively, I think, and that's a big

0:07:57.600 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>part of the evolution that I think has gone on

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>in podcasts over the last decade or so. Is at first,

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>particularly in true crime, it was a little bit salacious.

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Now it's a lot more victim centric and it's a

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>lot more considerate of the experiences that people have had

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and the people around them as well. Tortois Media has

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>this year been in negotiations to buy The Observer newspaper

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>from the Guardian. That's been something that staff of both

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>The Guardian and The Observer have objected to really wildly.

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 3>It's a really interesting example of new media consuming the old,

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 3>isn't it, and the new power structure emerging.

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. I suppose for us here we've gone the other way,

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>as many other publishers have in terms of incorporating audio

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>into an existing ecosystem which started with print then moved

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to digital. But yes, watching it go back the other

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:56.079
<v Speaker 1>way and seeing journalists in particular engage in that conversation

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>about why it's a good idea or a bad idea

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>is really interesting. One to queen of domestic violence claiming

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that she's a victim of violence is the biggest options

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>does a violent predatory one tortise series that we both

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>listened to and that we have discussed at length in

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the office. Here is who trolled Amber.

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 2>The scale of the attacks was staggering. Between twenty sixteen

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:24.079
<v Speaker 2>and twenty twenty two, more than eight hundred thousand tweets

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 2>were posted with the hashtag amberhard is an abuser Only.

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>It's another six episode series hosted by Alexi Mostros, who

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 1>was the host of Sweet Bobby and the journalists who

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 1>investigated that it was about the highly publicized court case

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>between Amber Heard and her ex husband Johnny Depp.

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 3>What I loved about who trolled Amber was that it

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 3>ignored the historyonics of the court case and did real

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 3>journalism about what was happening around that court case, in

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 3>particular why Amber Heard was being bombarded with huge volume

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 3>of hatred on social media and everything she said was

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 3>being amplified in a negative way. They came up with

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 3>some quite terrifying conclusions and it.

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Did feel a lot like Sweet Bobby in that way,

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a completely different story, completely different circumstances. I wrote in

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>my review for the paper that wherever you think you

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:22.679
<v Speaker 1>know this story is going, you could not be more wrong.

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Where it actually lands is miles away from where it begins,

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's done in that same really careful, considered way.

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:37.559
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Another category is lifestyle. My husband, like a lot

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 3>of men, is absolutely obsessed with car Talk and American

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:43.079
<v Speaker 3>podcast with two Italian American guys talking about cars.

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Hello on a log with the Car Talk from National

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Public Radio with us click and clack the tap. That

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>was a pretty Hello, robust, wouldn't you say? Robust?

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 3>More?

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Than robust a week.

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 3>One of them has been dead for several years, but

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 3>he still listens to the back catalog.

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>But this car has a carburetor. Yes, it has a carburetor. Yes,

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>you have carburetor icing an operator as yeah, and it's

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>caused by a mixture of cool air.

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:14.959
<v Speaker 3>I can highly recommend it for the men of a

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 3>certain age out there.

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>What about you?

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 3>What was your best lifestyle podcast ever?

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 1>And maybe off twenty twenty four? My favorite lifestyle podcast

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>ever is Maintenance Phase by Michael Hobbs who is a

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 1>journalist and Aubrey Gordon who is a blogger. And what

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>they do is debunk what they call junk science and

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:37.679
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote legitimate science.

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Man.

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you what all I ever want to drink

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>when we're recording is like phizzy things. And it's the

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>worst idea I know, because you're phizzy. Each week, one

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of them will pick a topic, or they might pick

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.439
<v Speaker 1>a particular diet book or just a concept that's been

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:53.319
<v Speaker 1>in the culture for a long time. One of their

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>very early episodes was about snake oil and how that

0:11:56.440 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>transitioned from being a legitimate Eastern medicine to something that

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 1>we used to describe somebody who's a little bit dodgy.

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Their ability to research and to synthesize and explain in

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 1>an entertaining, funny and succinct way is I think, really engaging.

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 3>That reminds me of an Australian one that I love

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 3>called do You Fucking Mind? Hosted by Alexis Fernandez. I

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 3>think I've tried to get you to listen to this

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 3>numerous times. I think you're too busy with maintenance face.

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 3>But Alexis Fernandez is a young Australian woman who went

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 3>and did a neuroscience degree because she was intrigued by

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 3>how the brain works. So each episode is a combination

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 3>of brain facts, how the brain works, and then her

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 3>incredibly foul mouthed but very clever and very entertaining take

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 3>on relationship issues, you know, whether it's how to deal

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 3>with toxic parents in law, and there's something about her

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 3>generation's fluency in the language of mental health and the

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 3>fact that they're dealing with the problems that everybody throughout

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 3>him history has dealt with. I'm loving hearing all of

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:06.959
<v Speaker 3>this from a woman in her twenties perspective, although I

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 3>must say whenever it comes on in my car. My

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 3>children object to the swearing in the title, so you've

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 3>it's something to be aware of. Okay, what about comedy

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 3>and humor. Something that I love is no such thing

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 3>as a fish. It is from the British television store QI.

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 3>If you haven't seen it, it's a panel show. On

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 3>that show, they have QI elves.

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>They are the researchers and so four of them come

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>together and they bring their favorite fact. It can be

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:36.079
<v Speaker 1>about absolutely anything, and as the show has gone on,

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>they've got more and more obscure. And of course there's

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>no such thing as a fish is one of the

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>first facts that were surfaced in this series way back

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>when Comy Bush. So we're measuring by the number of

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>items sold rather than by the value. And VW sells

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 1>more sausages than cars. So they come to Australia and

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>they sell out the Sydney Opera House. That is how

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 1>popular this is. And you do learn things. I find

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 1>myself constantly saying, oh I heard this on an episode

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of No such Thing as a Fish? That did you know?

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Blah blah blah. It makes me really good at pub

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>trivia if nothing else. And if you've got kids in

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the car, probably fine for them to listen to as well. Kristin,

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. Thank you.

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 3>Kristin Amiot is producer of the Front and she's The

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 3>Australian's podcast reviewer. You can read her column every weekend

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 3>in our review section and check out all the country's

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 3>best arts and entertainment journalism anytime at the Australian dot

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 3>com dot au slash review. Thanks for listening to the Front.

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Our team is Kristin Amiot, Lea Samaglue, Tiffany Dimac, Joshua Burton,

0:14:52.240 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Stephanie Coombs and Jasper Leek.