WEBVTT - Get More From Your Salary: Navigating Tax. Part One

0:00:00.330 --> 0:00:02.940
<v Speaker 1>This  series  is  brought  to  you  by  L&amp; G,  helping 

0:00:02.940 --> 0:00:04.980
<v Speaker 1>you  build  a  future  that's  a  little  bit  richer.

0:00:06.120 --> 0:00:08.789
<v Iona Bain>Hello  and  welcome  to  A  Little  Bit  Richer,  with  me, 

0:00:08.789 --> 0:00:12.450
<v Iona Bain>Iona  Bain,  brought  to  you  by  Legal &amp;  General.  Now  today 

0:00:12.450 --> 0:00:16.140
<v Iona Bain>we're  focusing  on  tax,  something  that  gets  taken  before  you're 

0:00:16.140 --> 0:00:19.290
<v Iona Bain>paid,  so  we  don't  think  about  it  too  often,  but 

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Iona Bain>maybe  you've  seen  videos  online  or  heard  stuff  from  friends 

0:00:22.290 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Iona Bain>about  ways  you  can  reduce  the  amount  of  money the  HMRC 

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.900
<v Iona Bain>gets  from  you.  And  you  might  be  wondering,  is  that 

0:00:27.930 --> 0:00:32.850
<v Iona Bain>complicated?  What's  the  catch?  Where  do  I  start? 
 Well,  we've 

0:00:32.850 --> 0:00:36.090
<v Iona Bain>enlisted  someone  who  is  definitely  going  to  help  us  understand 

0:00:36.090 --> 0:00:39.030
<v Iona Bain>this  whole  area,  and  that  is  tax  advisor  Tim  Paul. 

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:42.090
<v Iona Bain>He's  actually  joining  us  for  a  special  two- part  episode. 

0:00:42.390 --> 0:00:46.380
<v Iona Bain>Tim  is  a  certified  accountant,  social  media  finance  content  creator, 

0:00:46.650 --> 0:00:49.739
<v Iona Bain>and  is  the  co- founder  of  his  own  accountancy  practice, 

0:00:49.950 --> 0:00:52.290
<v Iona Bain>so  I  think  he  knows  a  thing  or  two  about 

0:00:52.290 --> 0:00:55.260
<v Iona Bain>tax.  He's  going  to  enlighten  us  on  ways  you  can 

0:00:55.260 --> 0:00:58.350
<v Iona Bain>reduce  the  tax  you  pay  while  improving  your  longer- term 

0:00:58.350 --> 0:01:02.190
<v Iona Bain>finances  all  in a  way  that  is  perfectly  legal.  This  is 

0:01:02.190 --> 0:01:05.250
<v Iona Bain>going  to  be  an  interesting  one.  Welcome,  Tim.

0:01:05.250 --> 0:01:07.229
<v Tim Paul>Thank  you.  I  love  that  intro.  It  makes  me  sound 

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Tim Paul>really  qualified.  Great.

0:01:09.180 --> 0:01:10.500
<v Iona Bain>Well,  you've  got  a  lot  to  live  up  to  now.

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Tim Paul>Exactly.

0:01:12.270 --> 0:01:15.300
<v Iona Bain>Can  you  just  give  us  a  very  brief  overview  of 

0:01:15.420 --> 0:01:19.290
<v Iona Bain>how  salaries  are  taxed  in  the  UK,  what  the  different 

0:01:19.290 --> 0:01:22.500
<v Iona Bain>tax  thresholds  and  tax  bands  are?  Just  talk  us  through  it.

0:01:23.370 --> 0:01:26.039
<v Tim Paul>In  the  UK,  we  run  on  a  marginal  tax  system, 

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:29.729
<v Tim Paul>which,  the  more  you earn, the more you  get  taxed.  Right  at  the  start, 

0:01:29.910 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Tim Paul>you've got your 12,570  pounds  in  tax- free  income  that  you  can  earn 

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.900
<v Tim Paul>each  year.  Up  to  this  threshold,  you  won't  pay  any 

0:01:36.990 --> 0:01:40.950
<v Tim Paul>income  tax  or  national  insurance.  Then  you've  got  from  12,570 

0:01:40.950 --> 0:01:44.670
<v Tim Paul>pounds  or  up  to 50, 000  pounds,  roughly  speaking,  you  pay 

0:01:44.670 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Tim Paul>20%  income  tax  and  you'll  pay  8%  national  insurance.  Then 

0:01:49.590 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Tim Paul>above  that 50, 000  pound  threshold,  it's  actually 50, 270  pounds.  You 

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.030
<v Tim Paul>then  start  to  pay  40%  income  tax,  which  is  obviously 

0:01:57.090 --> 0:01:59.370
<v Tim Paul>the  big  jump,  and  you  then  pay  an  additional  2% 

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.490
<v Tim Paul>in  national  insurance. 
 So  it's  essentially,  for  every  pound  that 

0:02:02.490 --> 0:02:06.630
<v Tim Paul>you  earn  above  50,000,  assume  42  pence  goes  straight  to 

0:02:06.630 --> 0:02:09.510
<v Tim Paul>HMRC,  the  rest  comes  to  you.  And  then  there's  an 

0:02:09.510 --> 0:02:12.180
<v Tim Paul>additional  rate  tax  band  which  not  a  lot  of  people 

0:02:12.180 --> 0:02:14.369
<v Tim Paul>end  up  getting  to,  but  if  you  do  earn  high, 

0:02:14.580 --> 0:02:18.570
<v Tim Paul>then  you've  got 125, 000  pounds  and  140  pence.  When  you 

0:02:18.570 --> 0:02:20.460
<v Tim Paul>earn  above  that,  you  then  go  to  the  additional  rate 

0:02:20.460 --> 0:02:23.370
<v Tim Paul>band,  which  is  45%  tax,  but  at  that  point  you're 

0:02:23.370 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Tim Paul>still  not  paying  any  more  national  insurance. 
 That's  essentially  how 

0:02:27.030 --> 0:02:29.940
<v Tim Paul>the  main  two  taxes  work.  The  additional  layer  to  that 

0:02:29.940 --> 0:02:32.220
<v Tim Paul>is  if  you've  gone  to  university,  of  course,  and  you 

0:02:32.220 --> 0:02:34.410
<v Tim Paul>have  a  student  loan  to  repay,  it  gets  a  whole 

0:02:34.410 --> 0:02:36.810
<v Tim Paul>lot  worse  for  you,  unfortunately.  I  am  one  of  those 

0:02:36.810 --> 0:02:40.950
<v Tim Paul>people.  For  my  band,  there's  different  repayment  plans,  and  the 

0:02:40.950 --> 0:02:42.660
<v Tim Paul>way  it  works  is  once  you  earn  above  a  certain 

0:02:42.660 --> 0:02:46.050
<v Tim Paul>threshold,  say  it's 25, 000,  you  then  start  to  repay  9% 

0:02:46.470 --> 0:02:49.950
<v Tim Paul>of  everything  that  you  earn  above  that  threshold,  again,  back 

0:02:49.950 --> 0:02:53.609
<v Tim Paul>to  HMRC.  So  it  adds  a  lot  of  additional  tax 

0:02:53.610 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Tim Paul>on,  but  that's  roughly  speaking  how  everything  works.

0:02:57.180 --> 0:02:59.610
<v Iona Bain>Some  would  say  that's  quite  a  brutal  system  in  so 

0:02:59.610 --> 0:03:03.510
<v Iona Bain>far as if  you  then  tip  over  into  a  new  tax  band, 

0:03:03.750 --> 0:03:05.850
<v Iona Bain>then  suddenly  the  amount  of  tax  you're  paying  is  a 

0:03:05.850 --> 0:03:09.510
<v Iona Bain>lot  more.  That's  why  people  are  looking  for  those  ways 

0:03:09.510 --> 0:03:13.380
<v Iona Bain>to  legally  reduce  what  tax  they  pay.  Can  you  talk 

0:03:13.380 --> 0:03:15.810
<v Iona Bain>us  through  why  salary  sacrifice  could  be  one  of  those 

0:03:15.810 --> 0:03:16.739
<v Iona Bain>tools  available?

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Tim Paul>Yeah.  Salary sacrifice, as  it  sounds,  it's  exactly  that:  you're  sacrificing  a 

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:24.930
<v Tim Paul>portion  of  your  salary  in  return  for  a  non- cash 

0:03:24.930 --> 0:03:30.060
<v Tim Paul>benefit  through  your  employer.  Let's  say  I  earn  40,000  pounds 

0:03:30.060 --> 0:03:33.630
<v Tim Paul>per  year.  I  can  then  reduce  the  amount  that  I earn by 

0:03:34.860 --> 0:03:37.500
<v Tim Paul>a  specific  amount  in  order  to  get  a  non- cash 

0:03:37.500 --> 0:03:40.380
<v Tim Paul>benefit,  which  could  be  a  gym  membership,  it  could  be 

0:03:40.470 --> 0:03:44.430
<v Tim Paul>private  healthcare,  a  company  car,  even,  cycling  to  work.  You 

0:03:44.430 --> 0:03:45.810
<v Tim Paul>can  get  that  all  through  your  employer,  and  then  it 

0:03:45.810 --> 0:03:48.660
<v Tim Paul>reduces  the  amount  in  tax  that  you  pay  because  it 

0:03:48.660 --> 0:03:51.990
<v Tim Paul>reduces  your  income  before  the  tax  is  deducted  on  your 

0:03:51.990 --> 0:03:56.070
<v Tim Paul>payslip.  So  I  would  then,  say, have a 2, 000- pound  non- cash 

0:03:56.070 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Tim Paul>benefit  for  the  year,  which  would  reduce  my  taxable  salary 

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:02.460
<v Tim Paul>to  38,000  pounds,  and  therefore  I'm  then  paying  less  tax 

0:04:02.490 --> 0:04:04.110
<v Tim Paul>on  that 38, 000  pounds.

0:04:05.070 --> 0:04:09.060
<v Iona Bain>Salary  sacrifice  definitely  sounds  really  intriguing.  What  does  it  actually 

0:04:09.060 --> 0:04:10.140
<v Iona Bain>look  like  in  practice?

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.460
<v Tim Paul>Let's  say  you  want  to  take  more  holiday  days.  You 

0:04:14.460 --> 0:04:16.830
<v Tim Paul>buy  more  holiday  from  your  employer.  You  can  do  that 

0:04:16.830 --> 0:04:20.700
<v Tim Paul>through  salary  sacrifice.  If  you  want  subscriptions  to  buy  a 

0:04:20.700 --> 0:04:24.570
<v Tim Paul>travel  card,  imagine  you're  able  to  do  those  things  before 

0:04:24.630 --> 0:04:27.539
<v Tim Paul>you  pay  tax  so  that  you're  essentially  saving  money  on 

0:04:27.540 --> 0:04:29.850
<v Tim Paul>your  payslip  because  you're  paying  less  income  tax,  not  your 

0:04:29.850 --> 0:04:35.370
<v Tim Paul>insurance.  So  anything  from  gym  memberships,  private  healthcare,  subscription  fees, 

0:04:35.700 --> 0:04:39.510
<v Tim Paul>electronic  devices,  it  can  all  go  through  salary  sacrifice  and 

0:04:39.510 --> 0:04:42.299
<v Tim Paul>it  reduces  taxable  income,  and  therefore  the  less  tax  you 

0:04:42.300 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Tim Paul>will  pay  on  it.

0:04:43.470 --> 0:04:45.330
<v Iona Bain>A  lot  of  things  that  people  will  be  paying  for 

0:04:45.330 --> 0:04:49.350
<v Iona Bain>anyway  from  their  post- tax  income,  maybe  they  could  get 

0:04:49.350 --> 0:04:51.659
<v Iona Bain>that  actually  done  at  source,  which  would  be  much  better 

0:04:51.660 --> 0:04:55.589
<v Iona Bain>for  them.  How  can  somebody  find  out  what  is  available 

0:04:55.589 --> 0:04:57.930
<v Iona Bain>from  their  employer  in  terms  of  salary  sacrifice?

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:00.210
<v Tim Paul>Well,  you  have  to  go  directly  to  your  employer  and 

0:05:00.210 --> 0:05:03.419
<v Tim Paul>ask  if  they're  willing  to  enroll  you,  which,  I  don't 

0:05:03.420 --> 0:05:03.930
<v Tim Paul>see  why  they  wouldn't.

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:05.910
<v Iona Bain>Yeah,  talk  to  your  boss.  See  what  they  say.

0:05:05.970 --> 0:05:06.450
<v Tim Paul>Exactly.

0:05:07.050 --> 0:05:09.390
<v Iona Bain>It  sounds  like  a  great  thing,  but  I'm  not  going 

0:05:09.390 --> 0:05:13.650
<v Iona Bain>to  lie,  salary  sacrifice  hasn't  got  the  best  brand.  Those 

0:05:13.650 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Iona Bain>are  two  words  that  you  don't  want  to  hear  together 

0:05:15.540 --> 0:05:17.159
<v Iona Bain>because  people  want  to  earn  as  much  as  they  can, 

0:05:17.820 --> 0:05:21.270
<v Iona Bain>but  are  there  circumstances  actually  in  which  going  for  that 

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:25.740
<v Iona Bain>could  actually  leave  you  better  off  because  of  the  tax  implications?

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:29.339
<v Tim Paul>Yeah,  definitely.  As  we  mentioned  before  that  when  you  go 

0:05:29.339 --> 0:05:31.710
<v Tim Paul>into  the  higher  tax  bracket,  when  you're  going  above  the 

0:05:31.710 --> 0:05:35.610
<v Tim Paul>50k  mark,  that's  when  it  could  become  very  beneficial,  because 

0:05:35.820 --> 0:05:39.089
<v Tim Paul>rather  than  getting  taxed  40%  on  that  amount,  you  earn 

0:05:39.089 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Tim Paul>above.  If  you  only  earn,  say,  53, 54, 55,000  pounds,  you  can 

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:46.620
<v Tim Paul>then  do  a  salary  sacrifice  to  bring  that  income  back 

0:05:46.620 --> 0:05:49.500
<v Tim Paul>down  to  50,  and  then  with that  additional,  you're  then  getting 

0:05:49.500 --> 0:05:53.219
<v Tim Paul>benefits  from  your  employer,  which  can  obviously  benefit  your  lifestyle 

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:57.060
<v Tim Paul>day  to  day.  So  it's  probably  potentially  a  better  way 

0:05:57.060 --> 0:06:01.170
<v Tim Paul>to  go  about it. You're being  more  tax- efficient  with  your  income.  That's 

0:06:01.170 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Tim Paul>probably  the  key  point.

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:05.820
<v Iona Bain>Are  you  seeing  more  people  looking  at  salary  sacrifice  and 

0:06:05.820 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Iona Bain>seeing  it  as  a  valuable  benefit  that  can  be  offered 

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.370
<v Iona Bain>by  some  employers,  or  is it  a  little  bit  under  the  radar?

0:06:11.430 --> 0:06:13.110
<v Tim Paul>I  would  say  it's  very  under  the  radar.  I  wish 

0:06:13.110 --> 0:06:15.390
<v Tim Paul>more  people  knew  about  it.  Maybe  they  could  have  named 

0:06:15.390 --> 0:06:18.150
<v Tim Paul>it  something  a  bit  more  interesting,  a  salary  benefit  scheme 

0:06:18.150 --> 0:06:20.940
<v Tim Paul>or  something  like  that,  but  people  also  maybe  just  don't 

0:06:20.940 --> 0:06:23.700
<v Tim Paul>really  understand  it,  because  they  might  assume  that, " Well,  it 

0:06:23.700 --> 0:06:26.490
<v Tim Paul>just  means  I'm  earning  less  money,"  but  in  actual  fact, 

0:06:26.670 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Tim Paul>if  you  think  about  it,  you  could  be  paying  less 

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:30.930
<v Tim Paul>tax  and  overall  be  better  off.

0:06:31.260 --> 0:06:34.170
<v Iona Bain>Salary  benefit,  I  like  that.  If  anyone  else  has  suggestions, 

0:06:34.170 --> 0:06:36.659
<v Iona Bain>answers  on  a  postcard,  we  want  to  hear  them.  What 

0:06:36.660 --> 0:06:40.650
<v Iona Bain>about  using  your  pension  to  reduce  your  take- home  pay? 

0:06:40.650 --> 0:06:41.700
<v Iona Bain>How  would  that  work?

0:06:42.540 --> 0:06:45.900
<v Tim Paul>With  your  pension,  it  works  in  a  similar  way  to 

0:06:45.900 --> 0:06:49.739
<v Tim Paul>the  salary  sacrifice  scheme.  Once  you're  22  or  older  or 

0:06:49.740 --> 0:06:52.529
<v Tim Paul>working  full  time,  you'll  be  automatically  enrolled  into  a  workplace 

0:06:52.529 --> 0:06:56.670
<v Tim Paul>pension.  And  then  every  time  you  contribute  to  it,  every 

0:06:56.670 --> 0:06:59.250
<v Tim Paul>penny  that  goes  in,  it  gets  taken  off  of  your 

0:06:59.250 --> 0:07:02.790
<v Tim Paul>growth  salary  before  tax  gets  deducted.  Again,  it  reduces  your 

0:07:02.790 --> 0:07:06.150
<v Tim Paul>taxable  salary,  soyou're  paying  less  income  tax and  national  insurance,  and 

0:07:06.150 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Tim Paul>of  course,  that  money  then  goes  tax- free  into  your 

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.340
<v Tim Paul>pension  pot,  your  employer  adds  to  it,  and  then  obviously 

0:07:11.340 --> 0:07:13.890
<v Tim Paul>you  put  that  towards  your  retirement,  it  reduces the amount of  tax  you 

0:07:13.890 --> 0:07:16.620
<v Tim Paul>pay  now  and  it  obviously  benefits  you  later  in  life. 


0:07:17.010 --> 0:07:19.110
<v Tim Paul>It's  probably  the  key  lever,  I  would  say,  for  any 

0:07:19.110 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Tim Paul>young  person,  30s, 40s,  whatever  age  you  are,  or  if  you're 

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:25.950
<v Tim Paul>about  to  go  into  a higher  tax  bracket,  if  you've  got 

0:07:25.950 --> 0:07:28.290
<v Tim Paul>a  big  bonus  coming  one  off  that  might  push  you 

0:07:28.290 --> 0:07:30.750
<v Tim Paul>into  a  higher  tax  bracket,  then  just  putting  a  bit 

0:07:30.750 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Tim Paul>more  into  your  pension,  even  if  it's  an  extra  few 

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:35.550
<v Tim Paul>percent,  it's  going  to  make  a  difference  in  how  much 

0:07:35.550 --> 0:07:38.010
<v Tim Paul>tax  you  pay.  Of  course,  the  big  difference  is  how 

0:07:38.010 --> 0:07:41.100
<v Tim Paul>much  will  then  eventually  get  added  by  your  employer,  and 

0:07:41.100 --> 0:07:43.650
<v Tim Paul>then  it  compounds  because  it  gets  invested  over  time,  and 

0:07:43.650 --> 0:07:46.620
<v Tim Paul>then  you  retire  hopefully  with  a  nice  pot  and  you 

0:07:46.620 --> 0:07:48.150
<v Tim Paul>can  be  more  comfortable  and  not  have  to  rely  on 

0:07:48.150 --> 0:07:49.140
<v Tim Paul>your  kids  to  look  after  you.

0:07:49.140 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Iona Bain>Yeah.  None  of  us  want that.  It's  one  of  those  rare 

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Iona Bain>instances  where  it's  actually  a  win- win.  Doing  what's  right 

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:57.330
<v Iona Bain>for  you  in  the  long  term  can  actually  benefit  you 

0:07:57.330 --> 0:08:01.470
<v Iona Bain>in  the  here  and  now.  How  well- informed  are  we 

0:08:01.500 --> 0:08:03.990
<v Iona Bain>when  it  comes  to  tax?  Because  I  can  say  quite 

0:08:03.990 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Iona Bain>honestly,  I've  been  a  financial  journalist  for  nearly  15  years, 

0:08:07.350 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Iona Bain>tax  is  one  of  these  subjects  that  I  still  don't 

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:12.690
<v Iona Bain>really  love  writing  and  talking  about,  partly  because  it  can 

0:08:12.690 --> 0:08:17.130
<v Iona Bain>get  really,  really  confusing.  What  are  the  most  common  misconceptions 

0:08:17.130 --> 0:08:19.110
<v Iona Bain>that  you  hear  about  when  it  comes  to  tax?

0:08:19.410 --> 0:08:24.300
<v Tim Paul>The  most  common  misconception  is  thinking  that  your  payslip  is 

0:08:24.300 --> 0:08:28.110
<v Tim Paul>viable  and  it's  correct.  Of  course,  HMRC  does  make  mistakes. 

0:08:28.170 --> 0:08:30.239
<v Tim Paul>I  actually  had  a  mistake  of  mine  when  I  first 

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Tim Paul>started  my  employment.  I  was  overpaying  my  student  loan  by 

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:33.900
<v Tim Paul>60  pounds  a  month. 

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Iona Bain>How  long had that been going on?

0:08:35.730 --> 0:08:37.380
<v Tim Paul>I  caught  it  early.  I  caught  it  within  I  think 

0:08:37.380 --> 0:08:39.121
<v Tim Paul>three  months,  but  over  a  course  of a  year, that's-

0:08:39.121 --> 0:08:40.050
<v Iona Bain>That would add  up.

0:08:40.051 --> 0:08:43.110
<v Tim Paul>...  hundreds  and  hundreds  of  pounds  that  you're  losing,  that 

0:08:43.110 --> 0:08:46.230
<v Tim Paul>you  shouldn't  be.  But  it's  good  to  check  because  often 

0:08:46.230 --> 0:08:48.990
<v Tim Paul>people  don't  realize  that  they  are  not  reclaiming  money  that 

0:08:48.990 --> 0:08:51.719
<v Tim Paul>they  could  be.
 The  other  one  is  a  lot  of 

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:53.429
<v Tim Paul>people  for  whatever  reason  seem  to  think  that  when  they 

0:08:53.429 --> 0:08:55.559
<v Tim Paul>go  into  a  high  tax  bracket,  it  means  that  they're 

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:58.740
<v Tim Paul>going  to  be  taking  home  less  income.  With  the 50, 000-

0:08:58.740 --> 0:09:01.650
<v Tim Paul>pound  bracket,  when  you  then  go  to  40%  tax,  a 

0:09:01.650 --> 0:09:03.179
<v Tim Paul>lot  of  people  seem  to  think  that,  oh,  well,  because 

0:09:03.179 --> 0:09:06.390
<v Tim Paul>I'm  now  getting  taxed  on  40%,  I'm  actually  worse  off, 

0:09:06.390 --> 0:09:09.420
<v Tim Paul>but  the  reality  is  you're  never  worse  off  because  the 

0:09:09.420 --> 0:09:11.820
<v Tim Paul>threshold  means  that  you  only  pay  the  40%  on  what 

0:09:11.820 --> 0:09:14.790
<v Tim Paul>you  earn  above  that  amount.  So  people  do  get  very 

0:09:14.790 --> 0:09:17.010
<v Tim Paul>confused  about  that.  You  just  have  to  remember  it's  a 

0:09:17.010 --> 0:09:19.950
<v Tim Paul>marginal  system.  Getting  a  pay  rise  is  never  a  bad 

0:09:19.950 --> 0:09:23.130
<v Tim Paul>thing.  Never  say  no  to a  pay  rise,  essentially,  is  the 

0:09:23.130 --> 0:09:25.020
<v Tim Paul>advice  that  I  would  give.  But,  yeah,  that's  one  thing 

0:09:25.020 --> 0:09:27.030
<v Tim Paul>that  I've  seen  a  lot  of  people  get  confused  about. 


0:09:28.140 --> 0:09:30.570
<v Tim Paul>In  general,  I  just  think  that  people  care  about  how 

0:09:30.570 --> 0:09:33.570
<v Tim Paul>much  they  earn  post- tax.  They  never  really  think  about 

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Tim Paul>what  they're  paying  on  their  payslips,  really,  because  it  doesn't 

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.540
<v Tim Paul>get  talked  about  and  it's  not  interesting.  No  one  wants 

0:09:39.540 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Tim Paul>to  sit  there  and  think  about  the  money  that  they're 

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:45.390
<v Tim Paul>losing  to  HMRC  every  single  month.  So  I  think  it's 

0:09:45.390 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Tim Paul>just  about  awareness  and  making  sure  that  people  understand  the 

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:52.710
<v Tim Paul>importance  of  knowing  it  early  because  unclaimed  tax  for  years 

0:09:52.710 --> 0:09:55.109
<v Tim Paul>and  years  is  really  going  to  be  putting  you  in 

0:09:55.110 --> 0:09:58.290
<v Tim Paul>a  worse  position.  Pensions,  again,  another  one  putting  you  in 

0:09:58.290 --> 0:09:59.910
<v Tim Paul>a  worse  position  if  you  just  don't  think  about  it. 

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:02.970
<v Tim Paul>The  key  is  to  make  sure  that  you're  reading  up 

0:10:02.970 --> 0:10:04.260
<v Tim Paul>and  then  taking  action.

0:10:04.830 --> 0:10:07.229
<v Iona Bain>There  may  be  people  thinking,  is  this  stuff  that  I'm 

0:10:07.230 --> 0:10:10.170
<v Iona Bain>allowed  to  do?  Because  when  we  talk  about  tax,  sometimes 

0:10:10.170 --> 0:10:13.140
<v Iona Bain>we  get  a  bit  uncomfortable.  People  think,  sounds  a  little 

0:10:13.140 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Iona Bain>bit  like  tax  avoidance.  Just  talk  us  through  how  legal 

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:17.220
<v Iona Bain>all  this  is.

0:10:17.340 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Tim Paul>Completely  legal.  I  think  with  the  salary  sacrifice,  some  people 

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:22.980
<v Tim Paul>might  think  that,  oh,  my  employer  might  not  want  to 

0:10:22.980 --> 0:10:24.599
<v Tim Paul>do  that  or  might  not  be  willing  to  or  they 

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:27.270
<v Tim Paul>can't,  but  it's  actually  in  your  employer's  best  interest  as 

0:10:27.270 --> 0:10:31.500
<v Tim Paul>well,  because  by  going  through  salary  sacrifice,  they're  actually  reducing 

0:10:31.500 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Tim Paul>their  national  insurance  contributions,  because  employees  make  national  insurance  contributions, 

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:37.860
<v Tim Paul>but  employers  do  at  the  same  time  as  well.  So 

0:10:37.980 --> 0:10:40.589
<v Tim Paul>it's  in  the  best  interest  of  both  because  they  both 

0:10:40.590 --> 0:10:42.809
<v Tim Paul>will  reduce  the  amount  of  national  insurance  they  pay,  and 

0:10:42.809 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Tim Paul>instead  that  money  will  go  towards  actually  helping  the  employees 

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:48.090
<v Tim Paul>with  whatever  it  is  that  they  want  to  do.  It is 

0:10:48.330 --> 0:10:50.579
<v Tim Paul>a  win- win  and,  like  I  said,  completely  legal.

0:10:51.030 --> 0:10:52.740
<v Iona Bain>And  when  it  comes  to  pensions,  that's  something  that  the 

0:10:52.740 --> 0:10:55.290
<v Iona Bain>government  wants  us  to  save  more  for  because  that  reduces 

0:10:55.290 --> 0:10:56.939
<v Iona Bain>state  dependency  later  on.

0:10:56.940 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Tim Paul>Yes.  Exactly.

0:10:57.990 --> 0:10:59.849
<v Iona Bain>Are  there  times  where  people  need  to  be  a  bit 

0:10:59.850 --> 0:11:02.370
<v Iona Bain>more  careful  about  reducing  their  take- home  pay?

0:11:02.820 --> 0:11:07.470
<v Tim Paul>Yeah.  There'll  be  one  instance  where if  you're  looking  to  apply 

0:11:07.470 --> 0:11:10.470
<v Tim Paul>for  a  mortgage  in the near  future,  you  just  want  to  make 

0:11:10.470 --> 0:11:15.090
<v Tim Paul>sure  that  you're  not  reducing  your  income  by  a  significant 

0:11:15.090 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Tim Paul>amount  whereby  it  could  impact  what  lenders  call  accessibility  of 

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Tim Paul>affordability,  so  essentially  is  really  about  speaking  to  your  mortgage 

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Tim Paul>broker,  making  sure  that  they're  aware  that  you're  claiming  whatever 

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.980
<v Tim Paul>benefits  you  are  through  salary  sacrifice  and  making  sure  that 

0:11:28.980 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Tim Paul>it  doesn't  impact  your  affordability  when  you  come  to  do 

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Tim Paul>the  mortgage  application. 
 But  again,  we're  talking  about  it  would 

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:37.260
<v Tim Paul>only  really  have  an  impact  if  we're  looking  at  maybe 

0:11:37.350 --> 0:11:40.530
<v Tim Paul>upwards  of  5,  6,  7, 000  pounds  that  you're  sacrificing 

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:42.780
<v Tim Paul>in  salary.  Then  it  could  start  to  have  a  bit 

0:11:42.780 --> 0:11:45.660
<v Tim Paul>of  an  impact  on  your  mortgage  application.  The  other  one 

0:11:45.660 --> 0:11:50.340
<v Tim Paul>would  be  your  national  insurance  contributions.  To  get  your  state 

0:11:50.340 --> 0:11:53.819
<v Tim Paul>pension,  you  obviously  need  35  years  of  qualifying  national  insurance 

0:11:53.820 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Tim Paul>contributions.  If  you're  increasing  your  salary  sacrifice  and  then  reducing 

0:11:58.230 --> 0:12:01.829
<v Tim Paul>your  income,  then  you  could  potentially  fall  below  that  threshold, 

0:12:02.010 --> 0:12:04.199
<v Tim Paul>but  that  threshold  is  only  about  6, 400  pounds  a 

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:07.679
<v Tim Paul>year.  Most  people  will  be  significantly  above  that,  anyway,  but 

0:12:07.950 --> 0:12:09.450
<v Tim Paul>just  one  other  thing  to  consider.

0:12:10.890 --> 0:12:14.429
<v Iona Bain>If  someone  is  about  to  approach  one  of  these  tax 

0:12:14.429 --> 0:12:17.429
<v Iona Bain>thresholds,  is  there  a  checklist  that  they  can  go  through 

0:12:17.429 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Iona Bain>in  terms  of  what  they  should  be  thinking  about?

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:21.179
<v Tim Paul>The  key  thing  is  to  understand  what's  going  on  in 

0:12:21.179 --> 0:12:23.250
<v Tim Paul>your  payslip.  What  does  your  tax  code  say?  Does  that 

0:12:23.250 --> 0:12:25.770
<v Tim Paul>correspond  to  what  it  should  say?  These  are  the  things 

0:12:25.770 --> 0:12:27.690
<v Tim Paul>to  check.  And  then  if  you're  getting  closer  to  a 

0:12:27.690 --> 0:12:30.660
<v Tim Paul>higher  tax  bracket,  once  you've  obviously  done  the  initial  check, 

0:12:30.660 --> 0:12:33.479
<v Tim Paul>then  it's  a  case  of  thinking  about  salary  sacrifice,  how 

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:35.970
<v Tim Paul>much  you  contribute  to  a  pension,  and  those  kinds  of  things.

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:38.699
<v Iona Bain>All  really,  really  good  tips,  Tim.  Thank  you  very  much.

0:12:38.700 --> 0:12:38.851
<v Tim Paul>You're  welcome.

0:12:38.851 --> 0:12:43.620
<v Iona Bain>That's all  for  part  one.  Next  time,  we'll  be  talking  through 

0:12:43.620 --> 0:12:47.939
<v Iona Bain>tax  on  side  hustles,  rental  income  and  personal  savings  allowances, 

0:12:47.940 --> 0:12:51.449
<v Iona Bain>and  we'll  also  cover  tax- free  childcare  and  have  some 

0:12:51.450 --> 0:12:54.270
<v Iona Bain>quick  wins  to  make  sure  you're  not  paying  any  more 

0:12:54.300 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Iona Bain>tax  than  you  need  to. 
 This  podcast  is  brought  to 

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:58.830
<v Iona Bain>you  by  L&amp; G.  You  can  keep  up  with  the 

0:12:58.830 --> 0:13:04.349
<v Iona Bain>show  on  YouTube,  TikTok  and Instagram, @ legalandgeneral.  If  you  have  a 

0:13:04.350 --> 0:13:06.870
<v Iona Bain>question  or  a  topic  that  you  would  like  answered  on 

0:13:06.870 --> 0:13:09.300
<v Iona Bain>the  show,  then  please  do  get  in  touch  on  our 

0:13:09.300 --> 0:13:12.809
<v Iona Bain>socials.  We  would  absolutely  love  to  hear  from  you.  Until 

0:13:12.809 --> 0:13:14.340
<v Iona Bain>next  time,  see  you  soon.