WEBVTT - Property or Pensions - What’s The Priority?

0:00:01.770 --> 0:00:04.230
<v Iona Bain>Hello  and  welcome  to  A  Little  Bit  Richer,  with  me, 

0:00:04.230 --> 0:00:07.110
<v Iona Bain>Iona  Bain,  brought  to  you  by  legal  in  general.  Now, 

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:09.690
<v Iona Bain>there's  a  lot  of  debate  online  about  whether  you  should 

0:00:09.690 --> 0:00:12.959
<v Iona Bain>prioritize  getting  on  the  housing  ladder  or  perhaps  put  off 

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:16.350
<v Iona Bain>the  property  dream  to  save  more  into  your  pension.  With 

0:00:16.350 --> 0:00:20.430
<v Iona Bain>house  prices  rising  and  traditional  retirement  paths  shifting,  millennials  are 

0:00:20.430 --> 0:00:23.910
<v Iona Bain>stuck  in  a  financial  tug  of  war.  Should  we  prioritize 

0:00:23.910 --> 0:00:27.030
<v Iona Bain>our  pension  contributions  so  we  have  a  more  comfortable  retirement 

0:00:27.270 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Iona Bain>or  buy  a  home  so  we  aren't  paying  rent  in 

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:32.669
<v Iona Bain>our  later  years?
 Well,  I  can't  think  of  anyone  better 

0:00:32.670 --> 0:00:36.059
<v Iona Bain>to  talk  to  today  about  this  topic  than  consumer  editor 

0:00:36.060 --> 0:00:39.810
<v Iona Bain>at  the  Financial  Times,  Claer  Barrett.  At  the  FT,  Claer 

0:00:39.810 --> 0:00:43.500
<v Iona Bain>writes  her  weekly  Serious  Money  column,  presents  the  Money  Clinic 

0:00:43.500 --> 0:00:47.100
<v Iona Bain>podcast  and  is  behind  the  newsletter,  Sort  Your  Financial  Life 

0:00:47.100 --> 0:00:49.379
<v Iona Bain>out  with  Claer  Barrett.  She's  also  the  author  of  the 

0:00:49.380 --> 0:00:54.570
<v Iona Bain>bestselling  book,  What  They  Don't  Teach  You  About  Money.  Welcome,  Claer.

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:56.190
<v Claer Barrett>Oh,  thanks  for  having  me,  Iona.

0:00:56.340 --> 0:01:00.180
<v Iona Bain>Claer,  can  you  set  the  scene  and  explain  why  this 

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:03.780
<v Iona Bain>debate  around  property  versus  pensions  has  come  about?

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:08.310
<v Claer Barrett>I  think  it's  always  been  there,  because  saving  for  retirement, 

0:01:08.459 --> 0:01:11.789
<v Claer Barrett>saving  for a  property,  ask  any  young  person  at  any  point 

0:01:11.790 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Claer Barrett>over  the  last  20 or 30  years, " Which  one  are  you  going 

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:16.650
<v Claer Barrett>to  prioritize?"  Of  course  it's  going  to  be  property  because 

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:19.410
<v Claer Barrett>we  want  to  get  on  the  housing  ladder.  We've  seen 

0:01:19.410 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Claer Barrett>what  house  prices  can  do  and  the  impact  of  owning 

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:26.250
<v Claer Barrett>an  asset,  which  could  rise  in  value.  No  guarantees,  of 

0:01:26.250 --> 0:01:28.500
<v Claer Barrett>course,  that  that's  going  to  keep  happening,  certainly  keep  happening 

0:01:28.500 --> 0:01:31.410
<v Claer Barrett>at  the  same  rate  in  the  future,  but  it's  been 

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Claer Barrett>a  one- way  escalator  for  generations  past.
 And  you  can 

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Claer Barrett>also  tell  your  landlord  to  do  one.  And  I  think 

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:42.420
<v Claer Barrett>for  many  people  it's  that  that's  the  motivation,  the  insecurity 

0:01:42.420 --> 0:01:45.270
<v Claer Barrett>of  living  in  rented  accommodation  as  well  as  the  huge 

0:01:45.270 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Claer Barrett>cost.  Maybe  you're  living  with  your  parents  for  longer  in 

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:51.540
<v Claer Barrett>order  to  save  up  for  a  property.  These  are  all 

0:01:51.660 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Claer Barrett>factors  that  are  pushing  young  people  towards  prioritizing  property  over 

0:01:57.420 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Claer Barrett>retirement,  which  seems  like  a  very,  very  distant  dream.

0:02:01.350 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Iona Bain>And  when  it  comes  to  pensions,  a  lot  has  changed 

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:09.030
<v Iona Bain>over  the  past  30,  40  years.  Now,  the  responsibility  is 

0:02:09.030 --> 0:02:12.030
<v Iona Bain>being  put  much  more  onto  the  individual,  isn't  it,  in 

0:02:12.030 --> 0:02:13.380
<v Iona Bain>terms  of  saving  for  retirement?

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:16.410
<v Claer Barrett>Yeah,  in  the  good  old  days,  the  sort  of  pension 

0:02:16.410 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Claer Barrett>that  you  would  retire  with  would  give  you  an  income 

0:02:19.770 --> 0:02:23.340
<v Claer Barrett>like  a  salary  every  year  of  your  life  until  you 

0:02:23.340 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Claer Barrett>died.  Nowadays,  all  of  that  responsibility  for  the  vast  majority 

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Claer Barrett>of  jobs,  unless  you  work  for  the  public  sector,  teaching, 

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Claer Barrett>civil  service,  doctors,  policemen,  fire  service,  you'll  still  have  one 

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:40.290
<v Claer Barrett>of  those  more  generous  final  salary  pensions.
 If  you're  working 

0:02:40.290 --> 0:02:43.739
<v Claer Barrett>in  the  private  sector,  it's  got  a  much  less  generous 

0:02:43.740 --> 0:02:48.060
<v Claer Barrett>pension  system,  defined  contribution  is what it's known as.  So  much  jargon  in  the 

0:02:48.060 --> 0:02:50.820
<v Claer Barrett>pension  as  well.  But  what  it  essentially  means  is  you're 

0:02:50.820 --> 0:02:53.820
<v Claer Barrett>paying  him  money,  your  employer's  paying  him  money.  You've  still 

0:02:53.820 --> 0:02:55.889
<v Claer Barrett>got  a  heck  of  a  lot  of  tax  advantages  if 

0:02:55.889 --> 0:02:57.750
<v Claer Barrett>you're  saving  money  into  a  pension,  but  the  end  of 

0:02:57.750 --> 0:02:59.790
<v Claer Barrett>the  day  you're  going  to  end  up  with  a  pot 

0:02:59.850 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Claer Barrett>of  money  that  you've  saved  and  invested,  and  hopefully  grown 

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:05.638
<v Claer Barrett>over  the  years,  but  it's  up  to  you  to  decide 

0:03:05.820 --> 0:03:07.980
<v Claer Barrett>what  you  want  to  do  with  it.  So  you've  got 

0:03:07.980 --> 0:03:10.830
<v Claer Barrett>to  manage  that  money  for  the  rest  of  your  life.


0:03:10.950 --> 0:03:13.919
<v Claer Barrett>Now,  this  is  where  the  pension  versus  property  debate  gets 

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:18.750
<v Claer Barrett>a  bit  more  interesting,  because  of  course  your  biggest  expense 

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:22.139
<v Claer Barrett>right  now,  if  you're  somebody  who's  young  and  working,  is 

0:03:22.139 --> 0:03:25.590
<v Claer Barrett>likely  to  be  your  rent  or  your  mortgage.  Now,  if 

0:03:25.590 --> 0:03:28.410
<v Claer Barrett>you  manage  to  get  on  the  property  ladder,  mortgage  payments 

0:03:28.410 --> 0:03:31.590
<v Claer Barrett>nowadays  a  lot  more  expensive  'cause  house  prices  have  risen, 

0:03:31.980 --> 0:03:34.679
<v Claer Barrett>but  eventually  you  are  going  to  pay  that  mortgage  off, 

0:03:34.770 --> 0:03:38.190
<v Claer Barrett>you  would  hope  before  you  retire.  And  then,  that's  going 

0:03:38.190 --> 0:03:39.930
<v Claer Barrett>to  be  a  big  cost  that  comes  out  of  your 

0:03:39.930 --> 0:03:42.390
<v Claer Barrett>budget.
 Whereas  if  you've  never  managed  to  get  on  the 

0:03:42.390 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Claer Barrett>property  ladder,  you're  going  to  have  to  fund  a  rent 

0:03:45.510 --> 0:03:48.750
<v Claer Barrett>from  any  money  that  you  save  into  your  pension.  So, 

0:03:48.930 --> 0:03:53.010
<v Claer Barrett>this  is  a  real  concern  to  people  who  are  maybe 

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.580
<v Claer Barrett>a  few  decades  out  from  retirement,  haven't  yet  managed  to 

0:03:56.580 --> 0:04:00.870
<v Claer Barrett>get on  the  property  ladder,  and  it  just  adds  urgency  to 

0:04:00.870 --> 0:04:01.530
<v Claer Barrett>this  problem.

0:04:02.070 --> 0:04:04.710
<v Iona Bain>So  saving  for  property  can  not  just  benefit  you  in 

0:04:04.710 --> 0:04:07.020
<v Iona Bain>the  here  and  now.  It  could  actually  help  with  your 

0:04:07.020 --> 0:04:11.730
<v Iona Bain>retirement  as  well,  but  are  there  circumstances  in  which  people 

0:04:12.090 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Iona Bain>might  be  better  off  renting  and  where  there  maybe  isn't 

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:17.970
<v Iona Bain>that  urgency  to  save  up  money  for  a  home?

0:04:18.270 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Claer Barrett>Well,  I  means  so  much  of  this  comes  down  to 

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:22.950
<v Claer Barrett>your  individual  circumstances,  but  I  think  that  the  Bank  of 

0:04:22.950 --> 0:04:26.310
<v Claer Barrett>Mum  and  Dad  really  are  the  big  unspoken  in  this 

0:04:26.310 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Claer Barrett>conversation.  Pretty  much  everyone  who  is  in  their  20s or 30s,  if 

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:31.500
<v Claer Barrett>they  are  getting  on  the  housing  ladder,  are  going  to 

0:04:31.500 --> 0:04:35.190
<v Claer Barrett>have  some  kind  of  help  from  their  families.  May  not 

0:04:35.190 --> 0:04:37.380
<v Claer Barrett>be  Mum  and  Dad,  it  might  be  Gran  and  Granddad, 

0:04:37.380 --> 0:04:39.900
<v Claer Barrett>but  nevertheless,  I  think  L&amp; G  has  worked  out  in 

0:04:39.900 --> 0:04:41.490
<v Claer Barrett>the  past,  the  Bank  of  Mum  and  Dad  is  something 

0:04:41.490 --> 0:04:44.219
<v Claer Barrett>like  the  seventh  or  the  eighth- biggest  mortgage  lender  technically 

0:04:44.790 --> 0:04:46.980
<v Claer Barrett>in  Britain  if  you  were  to  rank  them  among  them. 

0:04:47.070 --> 0:04:50.339
<v Claer Barrett>Now,  you  might  think, " Okay,  well  I'm  not  ready  to 

0:04:50.339 --> 0:04:52.859
<v Claer Barrett>buy  yet."  It's  a  lot  of  responsibility  that  comes  with 

0:04:52.860 --> 0:04:53.550
<v Claer Barrett>owning  a  home.

0:04:53.610 --> 0:04:55.710
<v Iona Bain>And  you  can  make  the  wrong  decision,  buy  the  wrong 

0:04:55.710 --> 0:04:58.470
<v Iona Bain>place  at  the  wrong  time,  and  make  a  big  loss.

0:04:58.500 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Claer Barrett>Yeah,  and  also  the  transaction  costs.  If  you're  not  sure 

0:05:01.980 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Claer Barrett>about  what  area  you  want  to  settle  in  and  live, 

0:05:04.830 --> 0:05:06.690
<v Claer Barrett>if  you  buy  somewhere  and  then  sell  it  and  buy 

0:05:06.690 --> 0:05:08.310
<v Claer Barrett>again,  you're  going  to  be  hit  with  two  lots  of 

0:05:08.310 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Claer Barrett>stamp  duty.  So,  it  doesn't  pay  to  hurry  when  you're 

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:15.810
<v Claer Barrett>making  decisions  about  property.  But  increasingly  younger  people,  Gen  Z 

0:05:15.900 --> 0:05:20.670
<v Claer Barrett>as  they're  known,  are  thinking  more  about  investing  first  rather 

0:05:20.670 --> 0:05:24.089
<v Claer Barrett>than  saving  in  cash  and  saving  for a  property.  Because  they 

0:05:24.089 --> 0:05:26.430
<v Claer Barrett>know  if  they  haven't  got  any  help  coming  from  their 

0:05:26.430 --> 0:05:30.029
<v Claer Barrett>family,  just  saving  in  cash  and  getting  the  interest  on 

0:05:30.029 --> 0:05:32.190
<v Claer Barrett>a  cash  savings  account  is  not  going  to  be  enough 

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:34.350
<v Claer Barrett>to  get  them  there.
 So  I've  seen  a  couple  of 

0:05:34.350 --> 0:05:37.740
<v Claer Barrett>surveys  come  across  my  desk,  big  surveys  in  the  last 

0:05:37.740 --> 0:05:39.630
<v Claer Barrett>couple  of  months  at  the  FT  that  have  said  that 

0:05:39.660 --> 0:05:44.610
<v Claer Barrett>Generation  Z  are  the  most  active  generation  when  it  comes 

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:47.729
<v Claer Barrett>to  investing  money  in  the  stock  market,  using  stocks  and 

0:05:47.730 --> 0:05:50.940
<v Claer Barrett>shares,  ISAs,  so  it's  still  tax  efficient.  And  hoping  that 

0:05:50.940 --> 0:05:54.300
<v Claer Barrett>in  the  long  term  that  will  give  them  more  bang 

0:05:54.300 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Claer Barrett>for  their  buck  to  help  them  get  on  the  property.


0:05:58.110 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Claer Barrett>One  other  little  factette  that  I'll  slip  in,  'cause  this 

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Claer Barrett>is  something  that  I  used  when  I  got  on  the 

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Claer Barrett>property  ladder  in  my  late  20s,  there's  a  government  scheme 

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:09.630
<v Claer Barrett>called  the  Rent  a  Room  Scheme.  If  you  let  out 

0:06:09.630 --> 0:06:12.659
<v Claer Barrett>a  furnished  room  in  your  home,  it  doesn't  have  to 

0:06:12.660 --> 0:06:15.270
<v Claer Barrett>be  permanently  to  a  lodger,  although  that's  what  I  did, 

0:06:15.870 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Claer Barrett>you  could  do  Airbnb  and  be  renting  it  out  during 

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:22.409
<v Claer Barrett>the  week,  for  example.
 You  can  make  up  to  seven 

0:06:22.410 --> 0:06:26.430
<v Claer Barrett>and  a  half  thousand  pounds  tax- free  from  doing  that 

0:06:26.430 --> 0:06:29.310
<v Claer Barrett>per  tax  year,  April  to  April,  and  best  of  all, 

0:06:29.550 --> 0:06:31.890
<v Claer Barrett>you  don't  even  need  to  Claer  it  on  a  tax 

0:06:31.890 --> 0:06:35.790
<v Claer Barrett>return.  So,  your  property  could  be  earning  money  for  you 

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Claer Barrett>if  you've  got  a  spare  bedroom.  And  that's  something  that 

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Claer Barrett>helped  me  get  over  the  line  when  I  was  doing 

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Claer Barrett>all  of  my  sums  and  working  out  what  mortgage,  what 

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.100
<v Claer Barrett>property,  what  area  I  could  afford  to  live  in.

0:06:47.610 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Iona Bain>But  also,  if  you  have  then  got  on  the  property 

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:51.900
<v Iona Bain>ladder  and  you  are  able  to  use  that  kind  of 

0:06:51.900 --> 0:06:54.510
<v Iona Bain>scheme,  you  could  put  that  cash  into  your  pension,  perhaps.

0:06:55.349 --> 0:06:55.500
<v Claer Barrett>Oh.

0:06:55.500 --> 0:06:55.830
<v Iona Bain>You  see?

0:06:55.890 --> 0:06:56.820
<v Claer Barrett>Very  good,  Ms.  Bain.

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:00.630
<v Iona Bain>And  also,  saving  for a  property  doesn't  just  help  you  in 

0:07:00.630 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Iona Bain>the  short  term.  It  can  also  help  you  in  retirement.

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:09.180
<v Claer Barrett>It  can.  So,  all  of  the  main  calculations  of  retirement 

0:07:09.180 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Claer Barrett>living  standards,  they've  come  up  with  these  rules  of  thumb 

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Claer Barrett>to  give  people  an  idea  of  how  much  money  they 

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Claer Barrett>would  need  to  aim  to  provide  for  themselves  every  year 

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.290
<v Claer Barrett>in  retirement  to  have  a  basic  standard  of  living,  which 

0:07:22.290 --> 0:07:25.860
<v Claer Barrett>is  basically  the  state  pension  plus  something  else,  an  intermediate 

0:07:25.860 --> 0:07:29.250
<v Claer Barrett>and  much  more  affluent  style  of  living.  But  all  of 

0:07:29.250 --> 0:07:34.050
<v Claer Barrett>these  calculations  assume  that  you've  paid  off  your  mortgage.
 Now, 

0:07:34.140 --> 0:07:37.590
<v Claer Barrett>the  most  popular  mortgage  term  used  to  be  25  years, 

0:07:37.590 --> 0:07:41.070
<v Claer Barrett>now  it's  30  years.  It's  also  possible  to  get  a  40-

0:07:41.070 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Claer Barrett>year  term  if  you're a  young  person.  Now,  it's  great  you 

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:46.350
<v Claer Barrett>can  stretch  out  those  payments  and  make  them  more  affordable 

0:07:46.350 --> 0:07:48.750
<v Claer Barrett>so  more  people  can  get  on  the  ladder,  but  ultimately, 

0:07:49.380 --> 0:07:51.570
<v Claer Barrett>over  the  course  of 35,  40  years,  you're  going  to  be 

0:07:51.570 --> 0:07:54.810
<v Claer Barrett>paying  back  an  awful  lot  more  interest.  So  that's  compounding 

0:07:54.810 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Claer Barrett>again,  but  in  reverse.  Compounding  working  against  you.
 So,  the 

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:01.350
<v Claer Barrett>other  thing  that  you  need  to  look  at,  especially  as 

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Claer Barrett>your  career  progresses  and  your  salary  starts  to  rise  is, "

0:08:04.950 --> 0:08:08.310
<v Claer Barrett>Is  it  going  to  be  worth  it  for  me  to 

0:08:08.430 --> 0:08:11.850
<v Claer Barrett>do  an  overpayment  on  my  mortgage?  And  am  I  going 

0:08:11.850 --> 0:08:14.489
<v Claer Barrett>to  get  more  bang  for  my  buck  doing  that  or 

0:08:14.490 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Claer Barrett>making  an  overpayment  into  my  pension?"  If  you  are  in 

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:19.679
<v Claer Barrett>that  lucky  position  and  you  have  got  a  bit  of 

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Claer Barrett>extra  money  that  you  think  you  could  sink  into  both. 

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:24.630
<v Claer Barrett>And  ultimately,  it  comes  down  to  tax.
 As  I  said 

0:08:24.630 --> 0:08:27.900
<v Claer Barrett>before,  if  you're  somebody  who's  earning  over  50,000  pounds  or 

0:08:27.900 --> 0:08:32.010
<v Claer Barrett>certainly  somebody  earning  over  100,000  pounds,  then  almost  certainly  the 

0:08:32.010 --> 0:08:35.670
<v Claer Barrett>pension  will  give  you  the  bigger  bang  for  your  buck. 

0:08:35.700 --> 0:08:40.140
<v Claer Barrett>But  equally,  if you are  making  even  a  small  overpayment  on  your 

0:08:40.140 --> 0:08:42.660
<v Claer Barrett>mortgage  over  time,  particularly  if  there's  two  of  you and  you're 

0:08:42.660 --> 0:08:45.510
<v Claer Barrett>both  doing  an  extra  100  quid  a  month  to  pay 

0:08:45.510 --> 0:08:49.890
<v Claer Barrett>off  the  mortgage,  it's  really,  really  surprising  how  quickly  those 

0:08:49.890 --> 0:08:54.150
<v Claer Barrett>savings  can  ramp  up,  knocking  years  potentially  off  your  mortgage 

0:08:54.150 --> 0:08:57.089
<v Claer Barrett>term  and  saving  you  thousands  in  interests.  So  just  be 

0:08:57.090 --> 0:09:00.540
<v Claer Barrett>aware,  be  curious,  don't  be  afraid  of  doing  some  maths.

0:09:00.540 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Iona Bain>'Cause  I  think  what's  clear  from  our  conversation  is  that 

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.220
<v Iona Bain>it  doesn't  have  to  be  either/ or  so  long  as 

0:09:05.220 --> 0:09:08.100
<v Iona Bain>you  get  the  facts  and  you  come  up  with  a 

0:09:08.429 --> 0:09:11.250
<v Iona Bain>plan.  I  think  one  of  my  favorite  mottos  when  it 

0:09:11.250 --> 0:09:13.559
<v Iona Bain>comes  to  this  whole  area  is  the art  of  the  doable. 

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:17.370
<v Iona Bain>Figure  out  what  is  doable.  And  it's  very  encouraging,  actually, 

0:09:17.370 --> 0:09:19.980
<v Iona Bain>when  you  said  before,  Claer,  that  something  is  better  than 

0:09:19.980 --> 0:09:22.050
<v Iona Bain>nothing  when  it  comes  to  your  pension,  but  it  is 

0:09:22.050 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Iona Bain>more  about  starting  early  and  staying  consistent.
 When  it  comes 

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:29.670
<v Iona Bain>to  how  you  decide  to  save  for  a  house  though, 

0:09:29.700 --> 0:09:32.460
<v Iona Bain>do  you  think  that  perhaps  we  need  to  bear  in 

0:09:32.460 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Iona Bain>mind  some  of  these  issues  around  having  a  mortgage  term 

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:40.380
<v Iona Bain>that  lasts  well  into  our  retirement,  potentially  creating  problems  for 

0:09:40.380 --> 0:09:42.750
<v Iona Bain>ourselves  further  down  the  line?  If  we  are  in  a 

0:09:42.750 --> 0:09:46.709
<v Iona Bain>position  to  perhaps  not  take  out  quite  so  large  a 

0:09:46.710 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Iona Bain>mortgage,  would  that  potentially  be  a  good  idea?  Obviously  not 

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:51.870
<v Iona Bain>possible  for  everyone,  but  maybe  for  some.

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Claer Barrett>It's  ironic,  isn't  it,  that  we're  having  this  huge  backlash 

0:09:54.540 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Claer Barrett>now  against  remote  working?  Because  this  for  me  was  the 

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:02.820
<v Claer Barrett>real  big  hope  for  younger  people.  You  could  afford  to 

0:10:02.820 --> 0:10:06.209
<v Claer Barrett>live  further  out,  buy  a  cheaper  property,  maybe  in  a 

0:10:06.210 --> 0:10:09.510
<v Claer Barrett>slightly  nicer,  more  countrified  location.  And  if  you've  only  got 

0:10:09.510 --> 0:10:13.470
<v Claer Barrett>to  go  into  the  office  physically  once,  twice,  maybe  even 

0:10:13.470 --> 0:10:15.719
<v Claer Barrett>three  times  a  week,  you're  going  to  save  money  on 

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Claer Barrett>the  commuting  costs  as  well.  You  can  get  a  part-

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:22.620
<v Claer Barrett>time  commuter  ticket.  So,  this  other  way  of  doing  things 

0:10:22.950 --> 0:10:26.189
<v Claer Barrett>were  starting  to  open  up.
 Now,  I  firmly  believe  that 

0:10:26.190 --> 0:10:30.210
<v Claer Barrett>we  will  keep  hold  of  the  many  benefits  of  flexible 

0:10:30.210 --> 0:10:32.730
<v Claer Barrett>working,  I  have  to  say.  And  I  think  the  benefit 

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:38.010
<v Claer Barrett>for  workers  is  so  great  that  people  would  rather  be 

0:10:38.010 --> 0:10:42.089
<v Claer Barrett>able  to  work  remotely  than  have  a  10%  pay  rise, 

0:10:42.150 --> 0:10:45.030
<v Claer Barrett>according  to  one  poll,  which  we  recently  wrote  about  in 

0:10:45.030 --> 0:10:47.790
<v Claer Barrett>the  FT.  And  you  do  have  a  choice  of  who 

0:10:47.790 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Claer Barrett>you  work  for,  and  you  do  have  a  choice  of 

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Claer Barrett>the  pension  scheme  of  that  employer.  So,  do  find  out 

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:58.110
<v Claer Barrett>about  what  different  companies  are  offering.
 Many,  it  will  only 

0:10:58.110 --> 0:11:01.230
<v Claer Barrett>be  the  bare  minimum  of  also  enrollment,  but  many  employers 

0:11:01.290 --> 0:11:04.559
<v Claer Barrett>are  much  more  generous.  And  that  is  a  real  bit 

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Claer Barrett>of  investigation  work  to  do  in  your  sector,  in  your 

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:12.450
<v Claer Barrett>industry,  finding  out  from  colleagues,  from  people,  from  like  LinkedIn, 

0:11:12.510 --> 0:11:16.410
<v Claer Barrett>sites  like  Glassdoor,  who  are  the  real  Rolls  Royce  employers 

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Claer Barrett>in  your  sector,  and  how  could  that  brighten  your  financial  prospects?

0:11:21.059 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Iona Bain>Give  us  a  sense,  Claer,  of  what  a  generous  pension 

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:28.110
<v Iona Bain>would  look  like,  and  what  maybe  people  could  be  looking 

0:11:28.110 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Iona Bain>out  for  in  terms  of  a  good  offer.

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:33.990
<v Claer Barrett>Okay,  so  the  bare  minimum,  also  enrollment,  is that  the  employee 

0:11:34.110 --> 0:11:38.849
<v Claer Barrett>pays  in 5%  of  their  salary  before  tax  and  the  employer 

0:11:39.059 --> 0:11:44.610
<v Claer Barrett>pays  in  3%,  so  8%  overall.  That's  the  bare  minimum, 

0:11:44.610 --> 0:11:47.190
<v Claer Barrett>so  long  as  you  earn  more  than  about 10, 000  pounds 

0:11:47.190 --> 0:11:51.420
<v Claer Barrett>a  year,  say,  roughly  speaking.
 But  a  more  generous  employer 

0:11:51.630 --> 0:11:55.439
<v Claer Barrett>might  pay  6%  into  the  staff  pension  instead  of  3%. 

0:11:56.190 --> 0:11:59.820
<v Claer Barrett>A  really  generous  one  might  pay  8%.  I  think  if 

0:11:59.820 --> 0:12:02.610
<v Claer Barrett>we  get  to  that  stage  where  people  are  much  more 

0:12:02.610 --> 0:12:06.270
<v Claer Barrett>empowered  to  ask  questions  about  their  pensions  early  when  they've 

0:12:06.270 --> 0:12:11.250
<v Claer Barrett>got  time  crucially  to  do  something  about  it,  the  outcomes 

0:12:11.309 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Claer Barrett>for  everyone,  future  taxpayers  and  governments  included,  will  be  much, 

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:15.750
<v Claer Barrett>much  better.

0:12:15.929 --> 0:12:18.929
<v Iona Bain>That's  really  interesting, 'cause if  you  go  to  a  dinner  party,  once 

0:12:18.929 --> 0:12:22.110
<v Iona Bain>you  get  to  a  certain  age,  the  conversation  inevitably  turns 

0:12:22.110 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Iona Bain>to  mortgages.  Or  even  if  you're  just  out  in  the 

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:26.010
<v Iona Bain>pub  or  meeting  friends.

0:12:26.010 --> 0:12:26.730
<v Claer Barrett>House  prices.

0:12:26.790 --> 0:12:28.349
<v Iona Bain>House  prices,  mortgages,  house-

0:12:28.350 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Claer Barrett>Renting.

0:12:28.830 --> 0:12:29.429
<v Iona Bain>Exactly.

0:12:29.429 --> 0:12:29.429
<v Claer Barrett>Landlords.

0:12:29.429 --> 0:12:32.070
<v Iona Bain>" How  can  we  get  on  the  property  ladder?"  That 

0:12:32.070 --> 0:12:34.559
<v Iona Bain>is  the  question.  Maybe  we  need  to  start  having  a 

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:36.990
<v Iona Bain>more  balanced  conversation.  Then  that  way,  we  can  start  to 

0:12:36.990 --> 0:12:39.211
<v Iona Bain>have  a  slightly  more  balanced  financial  future.

0:12:39.211 --> 0:12:43.710
<v Claer Barrett>And  I  think  Future  Fund  would  be  a  better  name 

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:45.870
<v Claer Barrett>for  pensions,  because  I  say  in  my  book,  you  think 

0:12:45.870 --> 0:12:49.650
<v Claer Barrett>pension,  you  think  pensioners.  Nobody  wants  to  get  old.

0:12:49.770 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Iona Bain>So,  we've  talked  about  how  lots  of  younger  people  might 

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:57.420
<v Iona Bain>feel  like  this  is  a  totally  unachievable  dream.  Have  you 

0:12:57.420 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Iona Bain>got  any  glimmer  of  hope  for  a  young  person  who 

0:13:01.950 --> 0:13:05.130
<v Iona Bain>has  one  advantage  on  their  side,  and  that  is  time? 

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:08.699
<v Iona Bain>What  can  they  do  with  that  time  in  order  to 

0:13:08.730 --> 0:13:12.300
<v Iona Bain>try  to  achieve  both  these  goals,  or  at  least  do 

0:13:12.330 --> 0:13:14.969
<v Iona Bain>something  for  themselves  that  will  benefit  them  in  the  future?

0:13:15.059 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Claer Barrett>Yeah,  feel  more  positive  rather  than  full  of  despair.

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:18.780
<v Iona Bain>Exactly.

0:13:19.020 --> 0:13:23.100
<v Claer Barrett>Okay.  So  doing  something,  as  I've  said,  into  your  pension. 

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:26.700
<v Claer Barrett>Also,  if  you're  self- employed,  that  is  a  bigger  feature 

0:13:26.820 --> 0:13:30.270
<v Claer Barrett>of  the  UK  labor  market,  the  so- called  gig  economy. 

0:13:30.330 --> 0:13:32.670
<v Claer Barrett>And  of  course,  you  don't  get  the  auto- enrollment  pension 

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.460
<v Claer Barrett>with  that.  You've  got  to  be  more  proactive  and  start 

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:38.429
<v Claer Barrett>a  small  pension  fund  saving  for  yourself.  More  and  more 

0:13:38.429 --> 0:13:41.099
<v Claer Barrett>young  people,  especially  if  they're  working  freelance,  are  going  to 

0:13:41.100 --> 0:13:45.090
<v Claer Barrett>fall  into  that  category.
 So  again,  educate  yourself.  Something  small 

0:13:45.150 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Claer Barrett>is  better  than  nothing  at  all.  But  then  when  it 

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:52.319
<v Claer Barrett>comes  to  saving  for  your  first  home,  the  lifetime  ISA, 

0:13:52.710 --> 0:13:56.730
<v Claer Barrett>yes,  there  are  caveats  to  this  product,  namely  the  property 

0:13:56.730 --> 0:14:00.120
<v Claer Barrett>price  cap  of 450, 000  pounds,  which  has  never  risen  in 

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:04.050
<v Claer Barrett>the  near  decade  since  this  product  was  introduced.  But  you 

0:14:04.050 --> 0:14:06.870
<v Claer Barrett>can  save  up  to  4, 000  pounds  a  year  and 

0:14:06.870 --> 0:14:11.099
<v Claer Barrett>get  a  25%  government  bonus.
 Now,  you  can  do  that 

0:14:11.100 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Claer Barrett>in  two  ways.  You  can  do it  in  cash  or  you 

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:16.260
<v Claer Barrett>can  do  it  as  a  stocks  and  shares  ISA.  So 

0:14:16.260 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Claer Barrett>if  you're  looking  at  a  5,  10, 15  year  period  to 

0:14:19.260 --> 0:14:21.420
<v Claer Barrett>save  up  for  a  house,  and  you  are  somebody  who 

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:23.790
<v Claer Barrett>wants  to  take  a  bit  of  risk  with  your  money, 

0:14:23.790 --> 0:14:26.910
<v Claer Barrett>then  it  is  possible  to  invest  that. But  the  fact  is, 

0:14:27.450 --> 0:14:28.950
<v Claer Barrett>a  lot  of  us  are  not  going  to  be  able 

0:14:28.950 --> 0:14:30.630
<v Claer Barrett>to  afford  to  buy  a  house.

0:14:30.930 --> 0:14:33.180
<v Iona Bain>This  has  been  such  an  interesting  discussion,  Claer.  I  would 

0:14:33.180 --> 0:14:37.110
<v Iona Bain>love  to  end  on  your  top  three  things  to  remember 

0:14:37.170 --> 0:14:39.150
<v Iona Bain>in  the  property  versus  pension  debate.

0:14:39.210 --> 0:14:44.250
<v Claer Barrett>Okay.  Both  are  important  and  valuable  assets,  so  try  not 

0:14:44.250 --> 0:14:48.300
<v Claer Barrett>to  neglect  one  completely  in  favor  of  the  other,  but 

0:14:48.330 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Claer Barrett>equally  remember  that  even  if  you  can  only  save  something 

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:56.490
<v Claer Barrett>small  into  a  pension  and  you're  young,  over  time,  those 

0:14:56.490 --> 0:14:59.670
<v Claer Barrett>amounts,  as  I  found  out  to  my  cost,  can  really 

0:14:59.670 --> 0:15:03.990
<v Claer Barrett>add  up,  especially  if  you're  benefiting  from  that  free  money 

0:15:04.230 --> 0:15:07.830
<v Claer Barrett>that  your  employer  is  paying  into.
 And  finally,  I'd  just 

0:15:07.830 --> 0:15:12.060
<v Claer Barrett>reiterate,  there  are  tools  online.  There  are  mortgage  calculators  that 

0:15:12.060 --> 0:15:14.820
<v Claer Barrett>you  can  look  at  over  payments.  There  are  calculators  where 

0:15:14.820 --> 0:15:17.490
<v Claer Barrett>you  can  look  at  how  much  pension  payments  might  grow 

0:15:17.490 --> 0:15:21.330
<v Claer Barrett>to  over  time.  Don't  be  afraid  to  go  and  use 

0:15:21.330 --> 0:15:24.630
<v Claer Barrett>them  and  have  a  play.  The  situation  may  not  be 

0:15:24.630 --> 0:15:28.890
<v Claer Barrett>quite  so  depressing  as  you  think,  but  an  informed  choice 

0:15:29.250 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Claer Barrett>with  what  you're  doing  with  your  money  is  always  going 

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Claer Barrett>to  be  better  than  a  guess.

0:15:33.750 --> 0:15:35.940
<v Iona Bain>Hear  hear.  Couldn't  agree  more.  Thank  you  so  much,  Claer.

0:15:36.060 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Claer Barrett>Thanks  for  having  me.

0:15:38.850 --> 0:15:42.330
<v Iona Bain>Loads  to  consider  there.  Next  time,  we're  talking  all  about 

0:15:42.330 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Iona Bain>inheritance  with  Dr.  Eliza  Filby.  This  podcast  is  brought  to 

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:48.330
<v Iona Bain>you  by  LNG.  You  can  keep  up  with  the  show 

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:52.650
<v Iona Bain>on  YouTube,  TikTok and  Instagram  at  Legal &amp;  General.
 I'd  love  it 

0:15:52.650 --> 0:15:55.050
<v Iona Bain>if  you  could  follow  the  podcast,  leave  us  a  review, 

0:15:55.170 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Iona Bain>and  help  others  get  a  little  bit  richer,  too.  Thanks 

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Iona Bain>for  listening.  Until  next  time,  see  you  soon.