WEBVTT - How the Left Captures Institutions

0:00:06.519 --> 0:00:11.240
<v S1>From the historic campus of Hillsdale College in Hillsdale, Michigan,

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:15.000
<v S1>where the good, the true and the beautiful are taught,

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:19.840
<v S1>nurtured and honored. This is the radio free Hillsdale Hour,

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:23.760
<v S1>bringing the activity and education of the college to listeners

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:25.200
<v S1>across the country.

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:29.840
<v S2>Think globally. Act locally. This was very popular in the

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:33.320
<v S2>90s with the environmental movement, and it sounds kind of

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:37.120
<v S2>intriguing at first. I propose that people think locally and

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:38.199
<v S2>act locally.

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:41.720
<v S3>This is your host, Scott Bertram. Welcome to the Radio

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:46.520
<v S3>Free Hillsdale Hour. Part of the Hillsdale College Podcast Network.

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:50.400
<v S3>That was Seth Barron, author of the recent book Weaponized

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:54.920
<v S3>The Left's Capture and Destruction of America's Sacred Institutions. We

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:57.880
<v S3>talk in depth with Seth about his book today and

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:02.000
<v S3>later on, Elizabeth Fredericks from Hillsdale's English department joins us.

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.600
<v S3>She'll begin a brief series on British literature of World

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:09.800
<v S3>War One. First, we're joined by Seth Barron. He is

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.200
<v S3>an editorial board member at the New York Post reporter

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:15.720
<v S3>and editor. And he's also the author of the recent

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:22.560
<v S3>book Weaponized The Left's Capture and Destruction of America's Sacred Institutions. Seth,

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:23.760
<v S3>thanks so much for joining us.

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:26.200
<v S2>Oh, thank you for having me on. It's a pleasure.

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:29.080
<v S3>So the title of the book is weaponized, and we've

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:33.400
<v S3>heard the term weaponization a lot more recently than, say, 15,

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.679
<v S3>20 years ago. What do you mean by weaponization, as

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:38.600
<v S3>you use the phrase throughout the book?

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:41.320
<v S2>Well, I'm looking at the ways in which certain key

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:46.319
<v S2>institutions in America, and I'm talking about civics. I'm talking

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:52.320
<v S2>about education, policing, and housing, these key institutions that really

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:58.160
<v S2>define the way Americans live. They've been infiltrated, subverted, and

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:01.600
<v S2>turned against the people through a weaponization of, I guess,

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:04.480
<v S2>you know, sort of our good nature and our sense

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:09.080
<v S2>of of what's right. Okay. For instance, take the term

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:14.200
<v S2>the American Dream. Uh, this used to refer to how

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:18.760
<v S2>Americans saw their lives in regard to how their children

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:22.680
<v S2>would would grow up. You know, Americans sought to provide

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:26.079
<v S2>for their kids, get a house, take vacations, and maybe

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:28.359
<v S2>their kids would do better than they did. But at

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:32.120
<v S2>some point, a dream came to mean not something that

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:38.040
<v S2>Americans aspired to, but something that foreigners had. Americans no

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:41.360
<v S2>longer were participants in the American dream. The American dream

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:45.959
<v S2>was something that we were that we owed to non non-Americans,

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:49.040
<v S2>to people abroad, all of whom had a right to it.

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:53.440
<v S2>So by twisting this phrase, they were able to, you know,

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:56.720
<v S2>in my thesis is to change the way we view

0:02:56.880 --> 0:03:00.280
<v S2>citizenship and make it that we no longer really have

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:04.760
<v S2>the right to determine who comes here, and that it's

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.519
<v S2>essentially a global, a global right.

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:12.600
<v S3>And immigration citizenship is one of the four main topics

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.680
<v S3>in the book weaponized. We're concerned about the meaning of

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:20.120
<v S3>citizenship and especially about assimilation to when a country stops

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:25.600
<v S3>expecting newcomers to assimilate into a common national culture. What

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:26.600
<v S3>do we lose?

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.320
<v S2>I mean, we lose any sense of of unity. We

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:32.760
<v S2>lose the sense of the nation as a nation. It

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:35.240
<v S2>just becomes a place for people to come and hang

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:39.640
<v S2>their hat like a clearinghouse. It becomes a place where

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:43.280
<v S2>foreigners come in and they say, well, we don't really

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.480
<v S2>like the nation, but we like what you've done with

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.920
<v S2>the place. We think we'll turn it into something else.

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:55.640
<v S2>So you wind up with society of disconnected people, people

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:59.640
<v S2>who are very low trust in one another. You basically

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:02.800
<v S2>wind up with something that's not really quite a nation anymore,

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:05.320
<v S2>so much as it is just like an like a,

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:08.480
<v S2>like an entrepot, like a, like a collection of people

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:12.320
<v S2>who are in a place for commercial reasons and, and

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:13.280
<v S2>nothing else.

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:16.799
<v S3>Seth Barron the book is weaponized left the left's capture

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:21.480
<v S3>and destruction of America's sacred institutions citizenship, policing, housing, education.

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:24.240
<v S3>Those are the four quadrants you write about and weaponized,

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:27.840
<v S3>and you argue early. If you control the operation of

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:31.599
<v S3>those institutions, you're in a pretty good spot to control

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:35.800
<v S3>the country. How why did you identify those four places

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.839
<v S3>as being the centralized place to turn our focus?

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:44.000
<v S2>Well, when I started thinking about the country in general,

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.520
<v S2>and I wanted to write a book about, you know,

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.080
<v S2>what I saw the problems that were happening mainly from

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.720
<v S2>the left. It occurred to me that, okay, the way

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:55.159
<v S2>America was, was founded is the idea that the people

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.640
<v S2>are sovereign and all power stems from the people, not

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:00.640
<v S2>from a king, not from the top, but from the

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:07.760
<v S2>people whom God has invested self-evidently with liberty and, you know,

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:14.360
<v S2>natural rights of self-government, basically. And so in the American system,

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.360
<v S2>power derives from the bottom and through the communities and

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:20.560
<v S2>then up to the states and then to the country. Well,

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.960
<v S2>this drives the left crazy because they have a universal

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:27.520
<v S2>vision that they want to impose everywhere all at once.

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:31.800
<v S2>So it's annoying to them to have to consult every

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:36.440
<v S2>different district, every different community, and gain consensus that way.

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.240
<v S2>They would prefer just to, you know, they have their

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:42.000
<v S2>diktats and they'd like to just impose them from the top.

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.120
<v S2>So it seemed that what was happening was that power

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:49.120
<v S2>was being lifted from the bottom and away from the

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:53.850
<v S2>people and, and raised up to these unaccountable levels like

0:05:53.890 --> 0:05:58.250
<v S2>people who have no accountability to, to the, to, to

0:05:58.290 --> 0:06:02.450
<v S2>the base. Essentially, an expert class should rule everything. And

0:06:02.450 --> 0:06:04.890
<v S2>just to go back to citizenship for a second, like

0:06:04.890 --> 0:06:08.970
<v S2>it occurred to me the same way that people are not,

0:06:09.330 --> 0:06:12.530
<v S2>you don't really have a say over who comes to America. Well,

0:06:12.529 --> 0:06:16.130
<v S2>I was looking at housing and zoning and the way

0:06:16.130 --> 0:06:20.450
<v S2>in which how decisions about what communities should look like

0:06:20.490 --> 0:06:24.810
<v S2>are being taken away from zoning boards and the community

0:06:25.010 --> 0:06:28.089
<v S2>and lifted up into like the state level where some

0:06:28.089 --> 0:06:31.810
<v S2>expert could say, yes, you have to build affordable housing here.

0:06:31.810 --> 0:06:36.650
<v S2>You have to allow quadruplexes here, you have to build a,

0:06:36.690 --> 0:06:40.289
<v S2>you know, an apartment building near the transit line. And

0:06:40.290 --> 0:06:42.489
<v S2>so basically what I saw was the same thing happening,

0:06:42.490 --> 0:06:44.650
<v S2>which is that the people who live in a place

0:06:44.890 --> 0:06:48.370
<v S2>no longer get to decide what happens there. So I

0:06:48.370 --> 0:06:51.250
<v S2>saw it happening at the top at such a broad level,

0:06:51.290 --> 0:06:55.849
<v S2>like the borders and citizenship. And then at this micro level,

0:06:55.890 --> 0:06:59.370
<v S2>like what happens in neighborhoods. And it occurred to me, yeah,

0:06:59.370 --> 0:07:02.370
<v S2>this is the problem. The left wants to capture all

0:07:02.370 --> 0:07:07.210
<v S2>the power and they do it by, um, you know, essentially,

0:07:07.890 --> 0:07:09.770
<v S2>you know, here's the thing, I don't know if you've

0:07:09.770 --> 0:07:13.810
<v S2>heard this phrase before, think globally, act locally. This was

0:07:13.810 --> 0:07:18.050
<v S2>very popular in the 90s with the environmental movement. And

0:07:18.050 --> 0:07:21.250
<v S2>it sounds kind of intriguing at first. It's like, oh yeah,

0:07:21.690 --> 0:07:25.090
<v S2>we should think globally, you know, have like a general

0:07:25.130 --> 0:07:29.850
<v S2>vision of things and then act locally. But what this

0:07:29.850 --> 0:07:32.530
<v S2>really means is don't trust the evidence of your own

0:07:32.530 --> 0:07:36.890
<v S2>senses and your own capacity to think. We have experts

0:07:36.890 --> 0:07:39.690
<v S2>over here who've done the thinking for you. They've got

0:07:39.690 --> 0:07:43.290
<v S2>the big picture. So they're going to impose their thought.

0:07:43.290 --> 0:07:47.810
<v S2>And you just think globally, meaning you, you, you adopt

0:07:47.850 --> 0:07:51.090
<v S2>whatever construct they have. So. Oh, well, we can't use

0:07:51.210 --> 0:07:55.450
<v S2>plastic straws because those destroy the environment. We have to,

0:07:55.730 --> 0:07:59.210
<v S2>you know, get rid of our gas stoves because, uh,

0:07:59.250 --> 0:08:03.530
<v S2>that releases carbon and eventually seeds will drown Florida. This

0:08:03.530 --> 0:08:08.650
<v S2>doesn't necessarily with the reality, you see, but they've duped

0:08:08.650 --> 0:08:12.890
<v S2>everybody in a sense to, to take on this, this vision.

0:08:12.890 --> 0:08:17.730
<v S2>So I propose that people like think locally and act locally.

0:08:18.170 --> 0:08:21.210
<v S2>And I think that's the real American. That's the American

0:08:21.210 --> 0:08:22.810
<v S2>spirit that we've kind of lost.

0:08:23.010 --> 0:08:25.850
<v S3>Seth Barron is with us. The book weaponized the left's

0:08:25.890 --> 0:08:31.090
<v S3>capture and destruction of America's sacred institutions. On policing, you

0:08:31.090 --> 0:08:35.170
<v S3>point out that those who advocate for defunding the police

0:08:35.170 --> 0:08:40.370
<v S3>always have this picture of some harmonious society that emerges afterwards,

0:08:40.370 --> 0:08:43.610
<v S3>not not one of lawlessness. And there's this discussion of

0:08:43.610 --> 0:08:47.610
<v S3>root causes of crime. And the root causes for our

0:08:47.610 --> 0:08:51.570
<v S3>friends on the left. Never are are. going back to

0:08:51.610 --> 0:08:54.410
<v S3>the actual person committing the crime. When they talk about

0:08:54.410 --> 0:08:58.130
<v S3>defunding and the society that emerges without police, are they,

0:08:58.170 --> 0:09:00.970
<v S3>in a sense, saying that police are the root cause

0:09:01.130 --> 0:09:03.250
<v S3>of crime in our cities?

0:09:03.530 --> 0:09:06.530
<v S2>Well, that is I think that's a thesis that goes

0:09:06.530 --> 0:09:10.490
<v S2>back to like the the 19th century with certain radical

0:09:10.490 --> 0:09:15.170
<v S2>thinkers who said, yes, the, the cause of laws or

0:09:15.490 --> 0:09:18.089
<v S2>the idea being that laws are put in place in

0:09:18.090 --> 0:09:23.089
<v S2>order to protect capital and to protect the elite. And

0:09:23.530 --> 0:09:27.530
<v S2>that's the and then the police are there to essentially

0:09:27.530 --> 0:09:31.650
<v S2>just carry that out. And the idea being like, like,

0:09:31.690 --> 0:09:36.370
<v S2>as Zoran Mamdani has said, violence is just a construct.

0:09:36.410 --> 0:09:40.530
<v S2>The idea of. So he would say that having landlords

0:09:40.570 --> 0:09:44.770
<v S2>is a form of violence. Having prisons is a form

0:09:44.770 --> 0:09:48.530
<v S2>of violence. Having, you know, punishment as we know it

0:09:48.610 --> 0:09:52.890
<v S2>is violence. These are all means of of using state

0:09:52.890 --> 0:09:57.730
<v S2>power to control people. So what they would like to

0:09:57.730 --> 0:10:00.610
<v S2>do is, well, they say what they'd like to do

0:10:00.610 --> 0:10:05.610
<v S2>is to undo these, these strictures and these, these modes

0:10:05.610 --> 0:10:09.770
<v S2>of state power and institutional control and come up with a,

0:10:09.850 --> 0:10:13.010
<v S2>I don't know, a more humane society. I think what

0:10:13.010 --> 0:10:15.730
<v S2>they really are mad about is the idea that that

0:10:15.730 --> 0:10:20.770
<v S2>the police are a they are a recipient of public taxes,

0:10:20.809 --> 0:10:24.770
<v S2>public revenue that they don't. The left actually cannot control.

0:10:24.809 --> 0:10:26.690
<v S2>So I think they basically would like to sort of

0:10:26.730 --> 0:10:30.569
<v S2>nationalize the police, basically bring the police under their umbrella

0:10:30.570 --> 0:10:33.930
<v S2>the same way they did for the teachers and for,

0:10:33.970 --> 0:10:38.130
<v S2>you know, certain other public sector groups. But yeah, I mean,

0:10:38.210 --> 0:10:41.330
<v S2>they do they do make a very radical argument that that,

0:10:41.410 --> 0:10:46.530
<v S2>that policing is, you know, essentially, they say it developed

0:10:46.650 --> 0:10:51.490
<v S2>evolved out of slave catching practice in the 1850s or so,

0:10:51.530 --> 0:10:54.370
<v S2>where they would deputize people to go out and find

0:10:54.410 --> 0:10:57.689
<v S2>slaves and catch them. They see the modern police department

0:10:57.690 --> 0:11:01.210
<v S2>as directly, directly connected to to the to the old

0:11:01.210 --> 0:11:04.770
<v S2>slave catchers. That's what police are. They're just people out

0:11:04.770 --> 0:11:07.329
<v S2>to enforce modern day slavery.

0:11:07.370 --> 0:11:11.370
<v S3>That's Seth Barron. His new book, weaponized the left's Capture

0:11:11.370 --> 0:11:15.809
<v S3>and destruction of America's sacred institutions will continue with Seth

0:11:15.809 --> 0:11:18.930
<v S3>in just a moment. First. You might have seen. And

0:11:18.929 --> 0:11:22.850
<v S3>judging by the box office, many have seen the new

0:11:23.010 --> 0:11:27.730
<v S3>Odyssey feature film. Well, here at Hillsdale College, we can

0:11:27.730 --> 0:11:30.490
<v S3>fill in the blanks. We can tell you what you

0:11:30.490 --> 0:11:32.810
<v S3>might have missed. We can give you the joy and

0:11:32.809 --> 0:11:36.730
<v S3>satisfaction of reading The Odyssey, and we do that through

0:11:36.730 --> 0:11:41.570
<v S3>our Hillsdale College online course, The Odyssey, with Doctor Ben Whalen.

0:11:41.570 --> 0:11:46.410
<v S3>He's your teacher. Join him for 12 lectures on the Odyssey.

0:11:46.450 --> 0:11:57.130
<v S3>Find it at hillsdale.edu/course. You'll explore themes of love, marriage, kingship, duty, piety, encounter,

0:11:57.130 --> 0:12:01.490
<v S3>Homer's epic, which displays the full human experience. If you've

0:12:01.490 --> 0:12:04.689
<v S3>seen the movie, you've got to take the online course,

0:12:04.690 --> 0:12:18.330
<v S3>The Odyssey with Doctor Ben Whalen. hillsdale.edu/course. hillsdale.edu/ewcourse. For the Odyssey,

0:12:18.730 --> 0:12:22.490
<v S3>we continue with Seth Barron. His recent book weaponized the

0:12:22.490 --> 0:12:27.410
<v S3>left's capture and destruction of America's sacred institutions. Seth, we

0:12:27.410 --> 0:12:29.210
<v S3>see this time and again when we have some of

0:12:29.210 --> 0:12:33.610
<v S3>these far progressive, far left progressive candidates, socialist candidates, DSA

0:12:33.650 --> 0:12:37.850
<v S3>candidates who are are talking about defunding the police, that

0:12:37.890 --> 0:12:41.690
<v S3>their support does not come largely from the communities that

0:12:41.690 --> 0:12:47.809
<v S3>these policies affect. How does the argument and ideology survive

0:12:47.809 --> 0:12:53.090
<v S3>when the consequences are hurting the intended beneficiaries? When the beneficiaries,

0:12:53.130 --> 0:12:55.689
<v S3>quote unquote, don't even support the policies?

0:12:56.010 --> 0:12:59.170
<v S2>You know, that's a great question. And, you know, for instance,

0:12:59.650 --> 0:13:03.250
<v S2>you know, you you see that the, the first victims

0:13:03.290 --> 0:13:07.850
<v S2>of like defunding the police or, or lessening policing are

0:13:07.850 --> 0:13:11.490
<v S2>people in like black communities because they're, they have the

0:13:11.490 --> 0:13:14.449
<v S2>highest rates of crime and thus the highest rates of

0:13:14.450 --> 0:13:17.810
<v S2>crime victimization. You know, there's this great trick on the

0:13:17.809 --> 0:13:20.090
<v S2>left where they can just say, well, we haven't done

0:13:20.090 --> 0:13:24.770
<v S2>it right. We didn't implement it correctly. There wasn't enough funding.

0:13:24.929 --> 0:13:27.050
<v S2>There was too much resistance from the other side. So

0:13:27.050 --> 0:13:28.890
<v S2>we just have to keep trying. I mean, it's the

0:13:28.890 --> 0:13:31.490
<v S2>same thing you hear when they say when they explain

0:13:31.490 --> 0:13:35.770
<v S2>why socialism is a failure everywhere it's tried. Well, it

0:13:35.770 --> 0:13:39.090
<v S2>hasn't really been tried. It's always been it's always been

0:13:39.090 --> 0:13:44.929
<v S2>hurt by American intervention, by sanctions. So sabotage. So we

0:13:44.929 --> 0:13:48.490
<v S2>just have to keep going. Um, it's a wonderful trick

0:13:48.490 --> 0:13:51.490
<v S2>they have built into it that they can never be

0:13:51.490 --> 0:13:56.930
<v S2>seen to fail. It's always just a question of doubling down. So,

0:13:57.370 --> 0:14:00.250
<v S2>you know, and then you can just convince your followers

0:14:00.250 --> 0:14:02.490
<v S2>that that's the problem. Well, you know, we just have

0:14:02.490 --> 0:14:06.329
<v S2>to keep going, comrades. Uh, so yeah, this has been

0:14:06.330 --> 0:14:09.010
<v S2>going on for a long time, but it seems to

0:14:09.010 --> 0:14:11.130
<v S2>keep working, which is remarkable.

0:14:11.250 --> 0:14:14.090
<v S3>Weaponized is the book The Left's Capture and Destruction of

0:14:14.090 --> 0:14:18.689
<v S3>America's Sacred institution. Seth Barron is the author. On housing,

0:14:18.890 --> 0:14:23.090
<v S3>you argue that fair housing or affordable housing is a

0:14:23.130 --> 0:14:27.010
<v S3>sneaky way for the left to wage war on the suburbs.

0:14:27.090 --> 0:14:29.490
<v S3>Why do they hate the suburbs and what do they

0:14:29.490 --> 0:14:30.650
<v S3>want to do about it?

0:14:31.890 --> 0:14:34.250
<v S2>The left hates the suburbs, has hated the suburbs for

0:14:34.250 --> 0:14:38.450
<v S2>a long time. They see the suburbs well, they formulate.

0:14:38.490 --> 0:14:41.970
<v S2>They see the suburbs as a source of conformity. Uh,

0:14:41.970 --> 0:14:49.610
<v S2>Of conservativism and essentially racism. Thesis of the left goes that.

0:14:49.650 --> 0:14:55.930
<v S2>Cities are where people like where real human life and

0:14:55.930 --> 0:15:01.890
<v S2>real human interaction takes place. And the idea being that

0:15:01.890 --> 0:15:05.930
<v S2>the people in control hated this. So they decided to

0:15:05.970 --> 0:15:10.610
<v S2>build the highway system in order to sell cars and

0:15:10.610 --> 0:15:16.090
<v S2>funnel white people out into segregated suburbs where they could

0:15:16.290 --> 0:15:21.609
<v S2>all be regimented and routinized and, you know, essentially factory

0:15:21.610 --> 0:15:26.010
<v S2>produced into these idealized robots. Now, of course, this is

0:15:26.050 --> 0:15:29.250
<v S2>a nonsensical point of view. I'm just explaining what they believe.

0:15:29.610 --> 0:15:33.650
<v S2>And according to this thesis, the cities remain the source

0:15:33.690 --> 0:15:37.930
<v S2>of all value and wealth creation. And the suburbs just

0:15:37.930 --> 0:15:42.170
<v S2>exploit the cities and extract all the wealth. And this

0:15:42.170 --> 0:15:45.930
<v S2>is something that the Brookings Institution even recently said, that

0:15:45.930 --> 0:15:49.610
<v S2>suburbs extract wealth from the cities, even though, you know,

0:15:49.650 --> 0:15:52.170
<v S2>the mechanism by which that happens is never made clear.

0:15:52.530 --> 0:15:55.290
<v S2>So and then, you know, what we've wound up with

0:15:55.290 --> 0:16:00.450
<v S2>are cities that are largely Democrat many times that's, you know,

0:16:00.490 --> 0:16:02.930
<v S2>very there's a lot of crime, there's a lot of poverty.

0:16:03.490 --> 0:16:06.410
<v S2>And this drives the left crazy because they would like to.

0:16:06.850 --> 0:16:09.890
<v S2>Ideally they would they basically want to annex the suburbs.

0:16:09.890 --> 0:16:14.490
<v S2>This was Obama's vision, a regionalization of urban areas to

0:16:14.530 --> 0:16:18.650
<v S2>connect the cities and the suburbs around them, to make

0:16:18.650 --> 0:16:22.410
<v S2>the suburbs take on the burden of providing for the

0:16:22.450 --> 0:16:27.090
<v S2>poor people who live in the city, namely through affordable housing.

0:16:27.370 --> 0:16:31.010
<v S2>And this is the affirmatively, Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing, which

0:16:31.010 --> 0:16:33.610
<v S2>was part of the Fair Housing Act of 1968, and

0:16:33.610 --> 0:16:38.210
<v S2>extending that to mean economic equality to to to achieve

0:16:38.410 --> 0:16:41.890
<v S2>economic Integration. So the idea being that you have to

0:16:41.930 --> 0:16:45.290
<v S2>force suburbs to take on the burden of building affordable

0:16:45.290 --> 0:16:49.290
<v S2>housing and affordable in this in this instance, just means subsidized.

0:16:49.570 --> 0:16:53.570
<v S2>That's a tricky word switch they've used to. I mean,

0:16:53.610 --> 0:16:56.930
<v S2>of course, everybody wants to have an affordable house, but

0:16:56.930 --> 0:17:00.130
<v S2>technically speaking, any house that someone lives in is affordable

0:17:00.130 --> 0:17:03.690
<v S2>to them. What they what they mean by affordable is subsidized.

0:17:04.090 --> 0:17:07.370
<v S2>So this is kind of why they hate the suburbs. Suburbs.

0:17:07.609 --> 0:17:10.930
<v S2>Suburbs are inhabited by people who have an investment in

0:17:10.930 --> 0:17:14.530
<v S2>the community they own. There's more home ownership, right. And

0:17:14.530 --> 0:17:18.810
<v S2>home owners are very conservative. They're very attuned to home

0:17:18.850 --> 0:17:21.530
<v S2>to the value of their homes. This is their major asset.

0:17:21.530 --> 0:17:24.129
<v S2>And the left hates this. They call it the home voter.

0:17:24.490 --> 0:17:29.450
<v S2>People whose voting patterns are closely tied to how they

0:17:29.450 --> 0:17:34.450
<v S2>perceive policies will affect the value of their homes. So

0:17:34.730 --> 0:17:38.899
<v S2>undoing this power is, is key to the left's vision,

0:17:38.900 --> 0:17:42.100
<v S2>and that's why they've changed zoning laws to make it

0:17:42.100 --> 0:17:45.740
<v S2>that the state can determine what happens in your community.

0:17:46.020 --> 0:17:50.420
<v S2>Why Obama and Biden would sue communities if they didn't

0:17:50.420 --> 0:17:54.740
<v S2>have enough subsidized housing for poor people. It's a very

0:17:54.740 --> 0:17:58.500
<v S2>long campaign they've been waging, and it's somewhat effective. Yeah.

0:17:58.540 --> 0:18:01.100
<v S2>And so even though suburbs are where most of the

0:18:01.100 --> 0:18:03.820
<v S2>economic growth is happening in America today, that's what they

0:18:03.820 --> 0:18:06.540
<v S2>don't want to admit. It's not really happening in the cities.

0:18:06.940 --> 0:18:09.900
<v S2>And more than that, this idea that the suburbs are

0:18:09.900 --> 0:18:12.780
<v S2>where the white people live and the cities are where

0:18:12.780 --> 0:18:16.100
<v S2>the black and brown people live, is also false. More,

0:18:16.220 --> 0:18:20.540
<v S2>I think a majority of the minority population lives in suburbs.

0:18:20.619 --> 0:18:23.900
<v S2>That's where all of the population growth is happening. So

0:18:24.460 --> 0:18:28.420
<v S2>it's an outdated model that they're they're addicted to. And

0:18:28.420 --> 0:18:32.619
<v S2>then you wind up with leftists flocking to, to cities

0:18:32.619 --> 0:18:37.420
<v S2>like in New York, voting for people like Mamdani. And

0:18:37.500 --> 0:18:40.780
<v S2>they have this vision of the world where everyone should

0:18:40.780 --> 0:18:47.940
<v S2>live in tightly dense like conurbations. Suburbs should be essentially

0:18:47.940 --> 0:18:51.900
<v S2>made illegal. And, you know, there's a social control element

0:18:51.900 --> 0:18:55.260
<v S2>to it. People in the cities tend to be, you know,

0:18:55.300 --> 0:18:57.460
<v S2>it's hard to raise a family in a city, so

0:18:57.460 --> 0:19:02.460
<v S2>there's less family formation, etc., etc.. So this is the vision.

0:19:02.660 --> 0:19:06.020
<v S3>On education set that might be, uh, one of the

0:19:06.020 --> 0:19:09.140
<v S3>four that has most buy in or most acceptance that

0:19:09.180 --> 0:19:11.780
<v S3>there has been a capture and a change, but it's

0:19:11.780 --> 0:19:16.180
<v S3>also different because there are alternative charter schools and private

0:19:16.180 --> 0:19:19.740
<v S3>schools and even home schooling. Does that mean that education

0:19:19.740 --> 0:19:24.300
<v S3>is the area, perhaps where institutional capture can be reversed

0:19:24.300 --> 0:19:25.380
<v S3>most quickly?

0:19:25.940 --> 0:19:28.100
<v S2>You know, that's a great question, and I do see

0:19:28.100 --> 0:19:30.100
<v S2>it that way a little bit. I don't necessarily see

0:19:30.100 --> 0:19:32.300
<v S2>that it can be reversed most quickly, but I see

0:19:32.300 --> 0:19:36.380
<v S2>it as a model action because this is one place

0:19:36.380 --> 0:19:40.340
<v S2>where the teachers unions are the most powerful unions in

0:19:40.340 --> 0:19:42.980
<v S2>the country. They're the largest unions, and they put more

0:19:42.980 --> 0:19:46.100
<v S2>money into politics than any other entity, I believe billions,

0:19:46.180 --> 0:19:49.460
<v S2>billions of dollars. This is all taxpayer money. Of course,

0:19:49.780 --> 0:19:53.020
<v S2>taxpayer money that goes into the schools goes to the

0:19:53.020 --> 0:19:57.460
<v S2>teachers unions, who have the power to negotiate their contract

0:19:57.460 --> 0:20:00.460
<v S2>and have the power to, you know, affect the political

0:20:00.460 --> 0:20:04.620
<v S2>system by putting money into it. So, yes, and they've

0:20:04.660 --> 0:20:08.780
<v S2>taken it over. But like you said, people have pushed back.

0:20:08.780 --> 0:20:11.619
<v S2>And so there are these movements like the charter school movement,

0:20:11.619 --> 0:20:16.619
<v S2>which is incredibly popular at, you know, at, at the roots, homeschooling,

0:20:16.820 --> 0:20:20.700
<v S2>private education. They, the left wants to destroy all of these,

0:20:21.140 --> 0:20:24.939
<v S2>these alternatives, but they've been unable to. Mhm. And all

0:20:24.980 --> 0:20:30.500
<v S2>of this happens at just with people operating locally. Um,

0:20:30.619 --> 0:20:34.260
<v S2>and that I again, like this whole think globally act locally.

0:20:34.260 --> 0:20:37.340
<v S2>I really see this as the vision. That's how charter

0:20:37.340 --> 0:20:42.699
<v S2>schools got going. That's how homeschool homeschooling networks evolved. So

0:20:42.740 --> 0:20:46.820
<v S2>I see I see education and the pushback against the

0:20:47.500 --> 0:20:53.659
<v S2>relentless institutional capture by the left as one, you know,

0:20:53.700 --> 0:20:56.540
<v S2>as a model for how how the people can start

0:20:56.540 --> 0:20:57.860
<v S2>to take back America.

0:20:58.180 --> 0:21:00.700
<v S3>Seth Barron with us. The book is weaponized. Seth, if

0:21:00.700 --> 0:21:05.859
<v S3>this is institutional, the problems are institutional in these areas

0:21:05.859 --> 0:21:10.660
<v S3>rather than electoral. What difference does winning elections make? How

0:21:10.700 --> 0:21:14.820
<v S3>much can winning elections even begin to fix or address

0:21:14.820 --> 0:21:15.580
<v S3>the problem?

0:21:15.859 --> 0:21:18.820
<v S2>Winning elections is great. Okay. We need to win elections.

0:21:18.820 --> 0:21:21.899
<v S2>But we also have to recognize the way the left operates.

0:21:22.300 --> 0:21:25.420
<v S2>The left sees politics as something that happens every day.

0:21:25.900 --> 0:21:29.020
<v S2>The right sees politics, like you said, as like the midterms.

0:21:29.020 --> 0:21:32.420
<v S2>And then every four years, the elections. The right has

0:21:32.420 --> 0:21:34.780
<v S2>a lot of things going on in their day. They

0:21:34.780 --> 0:21:40.780
<v S2>have jobs, they have families, they have religion. They have hobbies.

0:21:41.140 --> 0:21:45.859
<v S2>For the left, politics is their religion. Politics is their

0:21:45.859 --> 0:21:52.460
<v S2>love life. Politics is their circle of social circle. Politics,

0:21:52.460 --> 0:21:55.420
<v S2>in many cases is their job because they work in

0:21:55.700 --> 0:21:59.580
<v S2>the nonprofit or the government sector. So we have to

0:21:59.619 --> 0:22:05.100
<v S2>take on their model, which is relentlessly being involved in politics.

0:22:05.140 --> 0:22:07.179
<v S2>I mean, it's unfortunate that that's what it comes to

0:22:07.220 --> 0:22:09.980
<v S2>because nobody really wants to do that. People want to

0:22:10.180 --> 0:22:12.740
<v S2>hang out with their friends at church and with their

0:22:12.740 --> 0:22:16.220
<v S2>family and, you know, do projects on the weekends and

0:22:16.220 --> 0:22:19.260
<v S2>so forth. But we have to we have to recognize

0:22:19.260 --> 0:22:23.020
<v S2>that for the left, they're always engaged in politics. And

0:22:23.020 --> 0:22:26.659
<v S2>then elections are kind of like, you know, one of

0:22:26.660 --> 0:22:29.580
<v S2>the fruits winning elections is one of the fruits of

0:22:29.619 --> 0:22:35.379
<v S2>their hard work. Um, So elections, we definitely need to

0:22:35.380 --> 0:22:39.780
<v S2>win elections. Absolutely. But we have to recognize that politics

0:22:39.820 --> 0:22:44.379
<v S2>is a much larger process, and it really requires a

0:22:44.380 --> 0:22:48.540
<v S2>certain awakening that the left is ahead of us on this.

0:22:48.580 --> 0:22:52.500
<v S2>They're they're very, they're, they're, they're, they're always working. Like

0:22:52.900 --> 0:22:54.900
<v S2>when we get up, they've been doing, you know, they're,

0:22:54.900 --> 0:22:56.700
<v S2>they're sitting at the edge of the bed waiting for

0:22:56.700 --> 0:23:00.100
<v S2>us to, um, they've already, you know, done, done push

0:23:00.140 --> 0:23:03.140
<v S2>ups all night while we've been sleeping, basically.

0:23:03.180 --> 0:23:05.340
<v S3>Seth Barron is on the editorial board at the New

0:23:05.380 --> 0:23:08.859
<v S3>York Post. You can find him writing elsewhere and editing places, too.

0:23:08.980 --> 0:23:12.860
<v S3>The new book weaponized the left's capture and destruction of

0:23:12.859 --> 0:23:16.460
<v S3>America's sacred institutions. Seth, thanks so much for joining us

0:23:16.460 --> 0:23:19.139
<v S3>here on the Radio Free Hillsdale Hour.

0:23:19.180 --> 0:23:21.540
<v S2>It's been such a pleasure. Thank you for having me on.

0:23:21.580 --> 0:23:25.420
<v S3>Up next, Doctor Elizabeth Fredericks, associate professor of English here

0:23:25.420 --> 0:23:28.820
<v S3>at Hillsdale College, returns to begin a brief series on

0:23:28.820 --> 0:23:33.379
<v S3>British literature of World War One. I'm Scott Bertram. This

0:23:33.380 --> 0:23:52.500
<v S3>is the radio free Hillsdale Hour. Welcome back to the

0:23:52.500 --> 0:23:56.300
<v S3>radio free Hillsdale Hour. I'm Scott Bertram. Be sure to

0:23:56.300 --> 0:24:00.580
<v S3>follow us on X at Hillsdale Radio and Hillsdale College

0:24:00.580 --> 0:24:06.459
<v S3>Podcast Network at h c. We're joined by Doctor Elizabeth Fredericks,

0:24:06.500 --> 0:24:10.060
<v S3>associate professor of English here at Hillsdale College. Doctor Fredericks,

0:24:10.060 --> 0:24:10.980
<v S3>thanks for returning.

0:24:10.980 --> 0:24:11.980
<v S4>Thanks for having me.

0:24:12.020 --> 0:24:15.419
<v S3>Starting a brief series here about a very interesting course

0:24:15.420 --> 0:24:20.300
<v S3>that you just completed, teaching British literature of World War One.

0:24:20.340 --> 0:24:22.260
<v S3>And it's great because we have a little bit of

0:24:22.300 --> 0:24:25.300
<v S3>of cross-pollination here, both little literature, a little bit of

0:24:25.340 --> 0:24:28.580
<v S3>history coming through that literature as well. And we start

0:24:28.580 --> 0:24:32.740
<v S3>with something that I call the war. They thought they

0:24:32.780 --> 0:24:38.300
<v S3>were fighting as World War One begins in 1914. What's

0:24:38.300 --> 0:24:42.659
<v S3>the emotional tone that's dominating British writing and what's driving it?

0:24:42.700 --> 0:24:45.460
<v S4>Yeah. So the tone is, is a time of change.

0:24:45.460 --> 0:24:49.379
<v S4>The poets overall are sometimes resisting the lingering traces of

0:24:49.380 --> 0:24:52.340
<v S4>the Victorian era. Modernism is still in its very early

0:24:52.340 --> 0:24:55.620
<v S4>stages and is mostly a fringe avant garde movement. And

0:24:55.619 --> 0:24:57.700
<v S4>so the poets who are trying to innovate away from

0:24:57.700 --> 0:25:01.139
<v S4>the Victorian period are actually still very formal poets. A

0:25:01.180 --> 0:25:04.939
<v S4>lot of their work is very pastoral, bucolic, sometimes a

0:25:04.940 --> 0:25:08.419
<v S4>kind of rehashed romanticism. They're sometimes called the Georgian poets.

0:25:08.420 --> 0:25:11.540
<v S4>After some anthologies that a number of them appeared in.

0:25:12.220 --> 0:25:15.140
<v S4>And the tone of some of the poetry, including by

0:25:15.140 --> 0:25:18.660
<v S4>other poets who are sort of lingering major figures that

0:25:18.660 --> 0:25:21.620
<v S4>carry over from the romantic period, like Rudyard Kipling. There's

0:25:21.619 --> 0:25:26.300
<v S4>a real desire for some kind of new test of

0:25:26.300 --> 0:25:30.900
<v S4>courage or national identity. There's a real hunger to prove themselves.

0:25:30.900 --> 0:25:33.700
<v S4>The last war that Britain had really been in was

0:25:33.700 --> 0:25:35.940
<v S4>the Boer War, which of course had very mixed results

0:25:35.940 --> 0:25:39.100
<v S4>and was very far away from home. So you see,

0:25:39.140 --> 0:25:42.820
<v S4>you see this desire to kind of push and re-establish

0:25:42.820 --> 0:25:47.699
<v S4>and establish masculinity and patriotism. And alongside it, then you

0:25:47.700 --> 0:25:51.660
<v S4>also have this, like I said, pastoral, bucolic, romantic sort

0:25:51.660 --> 0:25:55.260
<v S4>of tone of the English countryside. It's very idyllic in

0:25:55.260 --> 0:25:57.700
<v S4>a lot of ways. So those are sort of kind

0:25:57.700 --> 0:26:00.300
<v S4>of some of the dominant strains or modes that you

0:26:00.300 --> 0:26:04.340
<v S4>see in that poetry in 1914, even before the war.

0:26:04.500 --> 0:26:07.500
<v S4>And then especially once the war begins, you have major

0:26:07.500 --> 0:26:11.620
<v S4>poets like Robert Graves, Rupert Brooke, Siegfried Sassoon and D H.

0:26:11.660 --> 0:26:14.740
<v S4>Lawrence are all kind of very significant younger poets at

0:26:14.740 --> 0:26:17.139
<v S4>this particular point in time. And they are, as I mentioned,

0:26:17.180 --> 0:26:20.820
<v S4>also very formal poets, too. They're writing in very traditional

0:26:21.180 --> 0:26:25.500
<v S4>meters and forms. Modernism hasn't made its inroads yet. Imagism

0:26:25.500 --> 0:26:28.260
<v S4>and futurism are these very avant garde movements that are

0:26:28.260 --> 0:26:30.780
<v S4>read only by very small groups, and are also seen

0:26:30.780 --> 0:26:33.179
<v S4>as having too much connection to either Europe or America

0:26:33.180 --> 0:26:36.379
<v S4>to really be English enough to sort of satisfy the

0:26:36.380 --> 0:26:37.780
<v S4>desire at this point in time.

0:26:37.820 --> 0:26:41.340
<v S3>World War One has been called the most literary war.

0:26:41.660 --> 0:26:45.060
<v S3>Do you think that's right? And maybe a little bit here, too,

0:26:45.100 --> 0:26:47.820
<v S3>as to how you conceive the course while you're interested

0:26:47.820 --> 0:26:48.740
<v S3>in teaching this?

0:26:48.940 --> 0:26:51.580
<v S4>Yeah. So one way I conceived the course was that

0:26:51.580 --> 0:26:54.940
<v S4>I was always teaching around this period in other courses

0:26:54.940 --> 0:26:57.140
<v S4>that I taught. So I regularly teach a course on

0:26:57.140 --> 0:26:59.699
<v S4>Victorian and modern British literature. We always do a day

0:26:59.700 --> 0:27:03.340
<v S4>on the World War One poets. We always do THETS

0:27:03.340 --> 0:27:07.300
<v S4>Eliot's The Wasteland as well. And I always do Virginia

0:27:07.300 --> 0:27:10.740
<v S4>Woolf's To the Lighthouse. And all of these works have

0:27:10.740 --> 0:27:13.459
<v S4>their either very explicit connection to the wars. In the

0:27:13.460 --> 0:27:15.660
<v S4>case of the World War One poets, we focus primarily

0:27:15.660 --> 0:27:20.139
<v S4>on Siegfried Sassoon and Wilfred Owen. There especially. But to.

0:27:20.180 --> 0:27:23.700
<v S4>The Lighthouse also has in that famous time passes sequence

0:27:23.700 --> 0:27:26.940
<v S4>in the middle. Some very direct references to the war

0:27:26.940 --> 0:27:30.340
<v S4>and war poetry. And of course, one way to look

0:27:30.340 --> 0:27:33.020
<v S4>at T.S. Eliot's The Wasteland is that it's this poet

0:27:33.060 --> 0:27:38.180
<v S4>of post-war England and post-war London in particular. So those

0:27:38.180 --> 0:27:40.419
<v S4>were things that I just I really loved them. I

0:27:40.420 --> 0:27:41.939
<v S4>really enjoyed them. I also taught a course on the

0:27:41.940 --> 0:27:45.540
<v S4>Bloomsbury Group. These are all writers who lived through the war.

0:27:45.580 --> 0:27:48.740
<v S4>They mostly don't fight in it, but they do engage

0:27:48.740 --> 0:27:52.060
<v S4>in it in different ways. E.M. Forster, for instance, works

0:27:52.060 --> 0:27:56.300
<v S4>in the National Gallery during the time period in which

0:27:56.340 --> 0:27:58.940
<v S4>London is actually on the receiving end of some air

0:27:58.940 --> 0:28:03.540
<v S4>raids and is putting like the best masterpieces in storage

0:28:03.540 --> 0:28:06.180
<v S4>and putting the third rate masterpieces on the walls, which

0:28:06.180 --> 0:28:09.340
<v S4>he said felt very appropriate. That's the correct company for

0:28:09.340 --> 0:28:12.580
<v S4>him is the third rate masterpieces. And he also then

0:28:12.619 --> 0:28:17.100
<v S4>worked in the Mediterranean identifying, uh, soldiers who were missing

0:28:17.100 --> 0:28:20.419
<v S4>in action among the wounded. So you have all these connections.

0:28:20.420 --> 0:28:23.380
<v S4>And I also really love some of the more recent

0:28:23.380 --> 0:28:25.670
<v S4>literature that's come out about World War One by Pat

0:28:25.670 --> 0:28:30.510
<v S4>Barker and Itchy and Hutchinson and some other writers. And

0:28:30.510 --> 0:28:31.790
<v S4>so I was just going, I really just want to

0:28:31.790 --> 0:28:35.430
<v S4>pull this all together into one class and see what

0:28:35.430 --> 0:28:37.790
<v S4>it's like to go through it. The big challenge of

0:28:37.790 --> 0:28:42.070
<v S4>producing the class actually became how to order it, because

0:28:42.070 --> 0:28:45.390
<v S4>the works are not published in the same order as

0:28:45.390 --> 0:28:47.310
<v S4>the time periods they deal with. And so if we

0:28:47.310 --> 0:28:51.030
<v S4>read by chronological order, we would read, for instance, the Wasteland,

0:28:51.030 --> 0:28:54.110
<v S4>which is about post-war London, before we read something like

0:28:54.110 --> 0:28:57.110
<v S4>David Jones's in Parenthesis, which is about his actual time

0:28:57.110 --> 0:28:59.430
<v S4>fighting in the war. And so he'd be constantly bouncing

0:28:59.430 --> 0:29:02.270
<v S4>around time wise. And so I actually, and this went

0:29:02.270 --> 0:29:04.550
<v S4>very much against my instincts in some ways organized the

0:29:04.550 --> 0:29:06.310
<v S4>course according to the time period in which the works

0:29:06.310 --> 0:29:09.710
<v S4>were set, rather than the time in which they were published,

0:29:09.710 --> 0:29:11.990
<v S4>in order to give us a more coherent reading experience.

0:29:12.150 --> 0:29:13.990
<v S4>But I've never had a course where that was such

0:29:13.990 --> 0:29:17.030
<v S4>a problem to kind of grapple with. So yeah, so

0:29:17.030 --> 0:29:20.270
<v S4>going back to World War One as the most literary war,

0:29:20.310 --> 0:29:22.150
<v S4>I think in a lot of ways it is right. One,

0:29:22.190 --> 0:29:24.590
<v S4>and it's part of this is some sociological things that

0:29:24.590 --> 0:29:27.350
<v S4>are going on. You have the educational changes of the

0:29:27.350 --> 0:29:30.630
<v S4>Victorian era that have caused this explosion in popular literacy,

0:29:31.070 --> 0:29:33.990
<v S4>as well as the rapid increase from the same time

0:29:33.990 --> 0:29:37.310
<v S4>period in print and periodical culture, which just means people

0:29:37.310 --> 0:29:40.510
<v S4>are accustomed to reading. And also more and more people

0:29:40.510 --> 0:29:42.830
<v S4>are accustomed to writing. So you have more and more

0:29:42.870 --> 0:29:46.750
<v S4>working class writers or lower middle class writers, as opposed

0:29:46.750 --> 0:29:49.430
<v S4>to the production of literary material being the work of

0:29:49.430 --> 0:29:52.390
<v S4>the literary elite or the cultural elite. And so you

0:29:52.390 --> 0:29:56.070
<v S4>have this army where people are just so accustomed to

0:29:56.110 --> 0:29:58.150
<v S4>reading and writing, and that makes it very easy for

0:29:58.150 --> 0:30:01.870
<v S4>them to produce work and also to consume work, whether

0:30:01.870 --> 0:30:03.430
<v S4>that's about the war or other things. A lot of

0:30:03.430 --> 0:30:05.310
<v S4>what they're reading in the trenches is actually not war

0:30:05.310 --> 0:30:09.350
<v S4>material as well, which is really fascinating. Another interesting effect

0:30:09.350 --> 0:30:11.990
<v S4>of this being a literary war is that because the

0:30:11.990 --> 0:30:16.390
<v S4>Western Front is so close to home, it is incredibly

0:30:16.390 --> 0:30:20.910
<v S4>easy for soldiers to quickly receive books and newspapers from England.

0:30:21.070 --> 0:30:23.630
<v S4>And so you have soldiers who will write back to

0:30:23.670 --> 0:30:26.030
<v S4>their family in the UK and say, I would really

0:30:26.030 --> 0:30:28.190
<v S4>like a copy of this book that came out last month.

0:30:28.190 --> 0:30:30.070
<v S4>Can you send it to me? And sometimes within a

0:30:30.070 --> 0:30:31.910
<v S4>week they would have a copy of it, if not

0:30:31.910 --> 0:30:34.590
<v S4>even less. And so there was just this very quick

0:30:34.590 --> 0:30:37.790
<v S4>delivery time back and forth. So books were shipped to

0:30:37.790 --> 0:30:41.270
<v S4>the trenches quickly and easily and then circulated among soldiers

0:30:41.270 --> 0:30:45.550
<v S4>in the trenches. Newspapers also came very rapidly. Also, one

0:30:45.550 --> 0:30:47.550
<v S4>of my favorite details is that you had the production

0:30:47.550 --> 0:30:50.990
<v S4>of trench newspapers themselves. Soldiers on the front lines were

0:30:50.990 --> 0:30:55.430
<v S4>producing material, newspapers and magazines for themselves in a variety

0:30:55.430 --> 0:30:57.590
<v S4>of ways. Sometimes these were handwritten. They would just take

0:30:57.590 --> 0:31:00.630
<v S4>paper they had and produce a handful of copies, writing

0:31:00.630 --> 0:31:03.470
<v S4>them by hand, and then circulate them. Sometimes they would

0:31:03.470 --> 0:31:07.550
<v S4>make use of military printing materials and supplies in order

0:31:07.550 --> 0:31:10.550
<v S4>to produce them on actual printing materials. And then sometimes

0:31:10.550 --> 0:31:14.110
<v S4>they found printing equipment in towns that had been evacuated

0:31:14.110 --> 0:31:16.070
<v S4>and then just made use of those as well behind

0:31:16.070 --> 0:31:18.870
<v S4>the front lines, and then circulated those newspapers or magazines

0:31:18.870 --> 0:31:21.190
<v S4>up to the front lines. And so the just the

0:31:21.230 --> 0:31:25.469
<v S4>sheer quantity of printed material that's produced is incredible. Even

0:31:25.470 --> 0:31:28.350
<v S4>away from the front lines. You have conscientious objectors in

0:31:28.350 --> 0:31:32.270
<v S4>prison who are also producing newspapers in prison, sometimes on

0:31:32.270 --> 0:31:35.030
<v S4>squares of toilet paper, which they would then post in

0:31:35.070 --> 0:31:37.830
<v S4>toilet stalls for the other prisoners to read because they

0:31:37.830 --> 0:31:39.870
<v S4>were forbidden to actually speak to each other. And so

0:31:39.870 --> 0:31:44.590
<v S4>just the impetus to write everywhere is, is remarkable. And

0:31:44.590 --> 0:31:47.110
<v S4>they produce a tremendous amount of material as a result.

0:31:47.150 --> 0:31:50.390
<v S3>Talking with Doctor Elizabeth Fredericks about the British literature of

0:31:50.390 --> 0:31:53.430
<v S3>World War One these early days here, what do some

0:31:53.430 --> 0:31:57.950
<v S3>of the early war poems reveal about how that conflict

0:31:57.990 --> 0:32:01.910
<v S3>was imagined before people really understood what was happening?

0:32:01.950 --> 0:32:05.350
<v S4>Yes, there's this real notion, especially in the early days

0:32:05.350 --> 0:32:11.790
<v S4>of 1914, of defending both small nations like Belgium and

0:32:11.790 --> 0:32:15.870
<v S4>also defending Englishness itself. There's a lot of pastoralism in

0:32:15.870 --> 0:32:19.390
<v S4>these early poems, a very idealised picture of rural England

0:32:19.430 --> 0:32:23.110
<v S4>that poets like John Masefield and John Freeman invoke in

0:32:23.110 --> 0:32:25.670
<v S4>their particular work. And so they give this sort of

0:32:25.710 --> 0:32:29.790
<v S4>very idealized rural place. And how people think this. Imagine this.

0:32:29.790 --> 0:32:32.670
<v S4>This is what you're fighting for. This sort of heart

0:32:32.670 --> 0:32:35.550
<v S4>of Englishness, which is also such a fascinating move because

0:32:35.550 --> 0:32:37.390
<v S4>most of the soldiers on the front lines don't actually

0:32:37.390 --> 0:32:40.350
<v S4>come from there. Most of them come from industrial environments.

0:32:40.350 --> 0:32:43.430
<v S4>And so it's a very imagined world that they're kind

0:32:43.430 --> 0:32:48.030
<v S4>of being encouraged to fight for. Thomas Hardy, interestingly, is

0:32:48.030 --> 0:32:50.230
<v S4>one of the few who sees this war from very

0:32:50.230 --> 0:32:53.550
<v S4>early stages as a real rupture between the two nations,

0:32:53.550 --> 0:32:56.310
<v S4>who were linked in many ways, reflecting on the fact

0:32:56.310 --> 0:33:00.229
<v S4>that their monarchs are cousins, for instance, by intellectual and

0:33:00.230 --> 0:33:03.550
<v S4>artistic traditions that become very entwined in the 19th century.

0:33:04.030 --> 0:33:06.670
<v S4>Like other English writers, he does blame the Germans for

0:33:06.670 --> 0:33:10.150
<v S4>the war primarily as the aggressors who have started it,

0:33:10.150 --> 0:33:12.550
<v S4>but he finds it appalling. He finds it a real

0:33:12.550 --> 0:33:14.950
<v S4>shift from what he sees as this 19th century culture

0:33:14.950 --> 0:33:18.590
<v S4>of exchange and mutual improvement that is just suddenly warped

0:33:18.590 --> 0:33:21.870
<v S4>and defaced into violence and horror.

0:33:22.470 --> 0:33:25.790
<v S3>Poems by Rupert Brooke are covered in the class two.

0:33:25.830 --> 0:33:28.790
<v S3>Why are his poems so powerful and so persuasive at

0:33:28.790 --> 0:33:29.310
<v S3>the time?

0:33:29.350 --> 0:33:32.230
<v S4>Yes. So there's I mean, one is that he is

0:33:32.270 --> 0:33:35.430
<v S4>a poet on the rise, so he's already a pretty

0:33:35.430 --> 0:33:40.350
<v S4>well respected and admired young poetic figure, very talented by

0:33:40.350 --> 0:33:42.550
<v S4>all accounts, also very beautiful. So he has this kind

0:33:42.550 --> 0:33:45.190
<v S4>of public persona that's built on both his appearance as

0:33:45.190 --> 0:33:49.070
<v S4>well as his work. And so there's there's that name

0:33:49.070 --> 0:33:51.830
<v S4>recognition that comes. It's also impossible to avoid the fact

0:33:51.830 --> 0:33:54.750
<v S4>that he dies very, very early in the war and tragically,

0:33:54.750 --> 0:33:57.990
<v S4>not even in conflict. He dies of septicaemia from an

0:33:57.990 --> 0:34:03.270
<v S4>infected mosquito bite that he actually retains in 1914. So

0:34:03.270 --> 0:34:05.550
<v S4>he doesn't he barely even makes it to combat in

0:34:05.550 --> 0:34:08.190
<v S4>a meaningful way. Nonetheless, he does a lot of the

0:34:08.190 --> 0:34:10.790
<v S4>things that we sort of talk about. He presents this

0:34:10.790 --> 0:34:15.189
<v S4>very beautiful, again, rural, idealised England that he imagines he's

0:34:15.190 --> 0:34:19.469
<v S4>fighting for. He also gives there's this very interesting, very

0:34:19.469 --> 0:34:23.190
<v S4>beautiful religious tone, famously in his five part sonnet sequence,

0:34:23.190 --> 0:34:25.910
<v S4>The Soldier. He gives us that line about, Thank God

0:34:25.910 --> 0:34:28.750
<v S4>who has matched us with this hour, and the sense

0:34:28.750 --> 0:34:31.310
<v S4>that this is going to be something that makes people

0:34:31.350 --> 0:34:37.149
<v S4>better versions of themselves. There's this image of idealized masculinity

0:34:37.150 --> 0:34:40.469
<v S4>that he offers, this idea of like soldiers into clean water.

0:34:40.630 --> 0:34:43.830
<v S4>Slipping is one of the images that he gives. And

0:34:43.830 --> 0:34:46.350
<v S4>then in the fifth poem of that sequence, he gives

0:34:46.350 --> 0:34:49.029
<v S4>this idea of, if I should fall in battle. Think

0:34:49.030 --> 0:34:51.910
<v S4>of that as there's some corner of England that is

0:34:51.910 --> 0:34:56.390
<v S4>forever there. Now, like if I die abroad, Englishness is

0:34:56.390 --> 0:34:59.390
<v S4>there too. And so we sort of spread it in

0:34:59.390 --> 0:35:02.669
<v S4>this way our ideals, our virtues, our beauty, our kind

0:35:02.670 --> 0:35:06.549
<v S4>of everywhere. And it's a sort of romantic death that

0:35:06.550 --> 0:35:09.110
<v S4>he offers one that's very in line with all these

0:35:09.350 --> 0:35:12.910
<v S4>young public school men raised upon classical literature, and this

0:35:12.910 --> 0:35:16.870
<v S4>ideal of dying in battle gloriously and beautifully. These poems,

0:35:16.870 --> 0:35:19.029
<v S4>I think, kind of feed upon that and offer that

0:35:19.030 --> 0:35:24.230
<v S4>as well. And so it's, it's a just this intensely idealized,

0:35:24.270 --> 0:35:27.630
<v S4>gorgeous picture that he offers of what it means to

0:35:27.670 --> 0:35:29.910
<v S4>go and fight, and then also what it may mean

0:35:29.910 --> 0:35:33.910
<v S4>to go and die. That downplays the terror and elevates

0:35:33.910 --> 0:35:36.710
<v S4>the nobility of what he thinks that he is doing.

0:35:36.750 --> 0:35:40.350
<v S3>Idealized masculinity is a phrase you use. Do. Do we

0:35:40.350 --> 0:35:44.989
<v S3>see that? Do we see duty? Do we see sacrifice

0:35:44.989 --> 0:35:48.230
<v S3>that become integral parts of this early writing?

0:35:48.310 --> 0:35:50.870
<v S4>There's a lot. And Kipling is one of the most

0:35:50.870 --> 0:35:53.990
<v S4>interesting writers to turn to to see some of this.

0:35:54.510 --> 0:35:57.150
<v S4>One thing you do see is a lot of, um,

0:35:57.190 --> 0:36:01.149
<v S4>Christ like imagery that appears particularly in his work. If

0:36:01.150 --> 0:36:04.109
<v S4>you look at his poem The Children, for instance, where

0:36:04.110 --> 0:36:06.509
<v S4>he's talking about because Kipling, of course, is too old

0:36:06.510 --> 0:36:09.150
<v S4>to go and fight himself and has incredibly poor eyesight,

0:36:09.150 --> 0:36:10.989
<v S4>so they wouldn't take him even if he wasn't over

0:36:10.989 --> 0:36:14.230
<v S4>40 years old. But so he's reflecting on the children

0:36:14.270 --> 0:36:16.989
<v S4>of people like himself who are going off to fight,

0:36:16.989 --> 0:36:19.350
<v S4>and he has the remarkable line, he says, where they

0:36:19.350 --> 0:36:21.870
<v S4>bought us anew with their blood. And you're like, that's

0:36:21.870 --> 0:36:25.029
<v S4>just this inevitable Christ like image that he's offering of

0:36:25.030 --> 0:36:27.230
<v S4>the sacrifice that the soldiers are giving. And this is,

0:36:27.230 --> 0:36:29.470
<v S4>of course, his poetry in the early days there as well.

0:36:29.510 --> 0:36:32.189
<v S4>His very famous poem from very early in the war,

0:36:32.230 --> 0:36:35.989
<v S4>from almost the literal beginning for all we have in

0:36:35.989 --> 0:36:40.310
<v S4>our lives, this very borderline religious as well as patriotic duty,

0:36:40.310 --> 0:36:42.549
<v S4>that you must go fight because it's not just what

0:36:42.550 --> 0:36:44.670
<v S4>your country asks of you, but in some way it

0:36:44.670 --> 0:36:47.630
<v S4>must be what God is asking of you too. And

0:36:47.630 --> 0:36:51.670
<v S4>so both the the duty and sacrifice elements there have

0:36:51.670 --> 0:36:54.549
<v S4>this very strong religious pull that's, that's very hard to

0:36:54.590 --> 0:36:57.230
<v S4>resist there. And the masculinity piece is definitely part of

0:36:57.230 --> 0:36:58.950
<v S4>it as well. Like this is also just what you

0:36:58.950 --> 0:37:00.549
<v S4>would do if you're really a man, you will go

0:37:00.550 --> 0:37:03.190
<v S4>and defend England, and you'll also go and defend the

0:37:03.190 --> 0:37:06.950
<v S4>little countries like Belgium, who are small and don't have

0:37:06.950 --> 0:37:10.310
<v S4>big armies and need, like the brave Tommy, to come

0:37:10.310 --> 0:37:12.390
<v S4>and stand up for them. Jessie Pope, a very famous

0:37:12.390 --> 0:37:15.589
<v S4>propaganda writer for this time writes, for instance, poems that

0:37:15.590 --> 0:37:18.549
<v S4>cast the British Tommy as the David who stands up

0:37:18.550 --> 0:37:21.750
<v S4>to the Goliath who fights, and so again cast in

0:37:21.750 --> 0:37:24.630
<v S4>the strongly religious as well as patriotic mode.

0:37:24.670 --> 0:37:27.989
<v S3>Talking with Doctor Elizabeth Fredericks about the British literature of

0:37:27.989 --> 0:37:31.029
<v S3>World War One in the early days. Right now, the

0:37:31.030 --> 0:37:35.470
<v S3>39 steps. It's not about trench warfare, but it is

0:37:35.469 --> 0:37:38.750
<v S3>in this World War One conversation. Why does it belong?

0:37:38.989 --> 0:37:42.630
<v S4>Yeah. So the 39 steps is by the novelist and

0:37:42.630 --> 0:37:46.870
<v S4>politician John Buchan. And it's not explicitly about trench warfare.

0:37:46.910 --> 0:37:48.629
<v S4>It was also the very first thing we read in

0:37:48.630 --> 0:37:51.750
<v S4>this class. And my students, the day they came in

0:37:51.790 --> 0:37:54.950
<v S4>to talk about the first day, they just looked slightly puzzled.

0:37:54.950 --> 0:37:56.430
<v S4>And I was going, I bet you guys didn't think

0:37:56.430 --> 0:37:59.069
<v S4>you were allowed to have this much fun in a

0:37:59.070 --> 0:38:02.030
<v S4>class about World War One literature. And they went, no, no,

0:38:02.030 --> 0:38:04.950
<v S4>we did not expect that because it is a tremendously

0:38:04.950 --> 0:38:08.469
<v S4>fun novel. Now, Buchan doesn't fight in the war, but

0:38:08.469 --> 0:38:12.430
<v S4>he has this history in British government and military. He

0:38:12.510 --> 0:38:16.430
<v S4>was stationed in South Africa after the Boer War in

0:38:16.469 --> 0:38:19.989
<v S4>Lord Kitchener's kindergarten, as it was called, which is a

0:38:19.989 --> 0:38:23.870
<v S4>number of young, sort of upwardly mobile people who become

0:38:23.870 --> 0:38:27.549
<v S4>political and economic figures in Britain later. And so he's

0:38:27.550 --> 0:38:29.990
<v S4>one of those. When he returns to England, he remains

0:38:29.989 --> 0:38:35.830
<v S4>involved in the civil service and in 1915, 1914, 1915,

0:38:35.870 --> 0:38:38.109
<v S4>we actually don't have a very good handle on what

0:38:38.110 --> 0:38:40.350
<v S4>he was doing, which has led some to suspect he

0:38:40.350 --> 0:38:44.189
<v S4>was doing intelligence work, but he also, at one point

0:38:44.190 --> 0:38:46.430
<v S4>is ill. Or maybe he says he's ill and he's

0:38:46.469 --> 0:38:49.430
<v S4>actually doing intelligence work again. It's a little fuzzy for

0:38:49.430 --> 0:38:51.790
<v S4>people who've actually dug into it, but that's the time

0:38:51.790 --> 0:38:54.790
<v S4>period in which he writes the 39 steps is in

0:38:54.790 --> 0:38:59.750
<v S4>early 1915. And so the war has begun, and Buchan

0:38:59.750 --> 0:39:02.669
<v S4>has this eye towards morale on the home front from

0:39:02.670 --> 0:39:05.910
<v S4>the very beginning. Significantly, he does become the director of

0:39:05.910 --> 0:39:10.590
<v S4>information in 1917, which makes him a propaganda, essentially the

0:39:10.590 --> 0:39:14.590
<v S4>head of propaganda for the British government, and he later

0:39:14.590 --> 0:39:19.549
<v S4>becomes the head of intelligence. So very interested in morale,

0:39:19.550 --> 0:39:21.910
<v S4>in what people are thinking and in controlling the image

0:39:21.910 --> 0:39:24.670
<v S4>of the war. And so the 39 steps, while it's

0:39:24.670 --> 0:39:26.989
<v S4>not explicitly about the war, if we think of it

0:39:26.989 --> 0:39:30.910
<v S4>as propaganda, writing about that indirectly about the war, it

0:39:30.910 --> 0:39:33.910
<v S4>fits very well. It's not about trench warfare, but it

0:39:33.910 --> 0:39:36.989
<v S4>is about a conspiracy to start an international war in

0:39:36.989 --> 0:39:39.750
<v S4>Europe by assassinating a head of state suggestively headed by

0:39:39.750 --> 0:39:44.029
<v S4>German conspirators. So it's barely subtext that it's about World

0:39:44.030 --> 0:39:46.310
<v S4>War One. And so it's written very early in the war.

0:39:46.310 --> 0:39:50.790
<v S4>It's serialised in Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine in summer 1915 and

0:39:50.790 --> 0:39:53.230
<v S4>then published in full in the fall. And it's it's

0:39:53.230 --> 0:39:57.350
<v S4>a thriller. It's essentially just a domestic espionage thriller with

0:39:57.350 --> 0:40:02.030
<v S4>this main character, Richard Hannay, who's just an ordinary guy. No,

0:40:02.030 --> 0:40:05.070
<v S4>no one particularly special, as he goes to great pains

0:40:05.070 --> 0:40:08.150
<v S4>to point out. He just stumbles into this conspiracy rather

0:40:08.150 --> 0:40:10.880
<v S4>by accident, and then has to do something about it

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:16.439
<v S4>because he's just a good, straightforward, honest British man. Made

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:19.640
<v S4>his pile in South Africa has this connection to Scotland.

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:21.719
<v S4>And so this is this is sort of the figure

0:40:21.719 --> 0:40:24.360
<v S4>that you have. He's very ordinary, like your soldiers who

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:27.640
<v S4>were fighting in the war, not particularly prominent, not particularly

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:31.280
<v S4>skilled in special things, but he just has this decency

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:35.200
<v S4>of character and this determination to do what's right and

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:37.680
<v S4>to do what must be done. And because he has

0:40:37.680 --> 0:40:39.279
<v S4>spent this time in South Africa, he also has a

0:40:39.280 --> 0:40:43.200
<v S4>remarkable number of practical skills as well. So that's very helpful.

0:40:43.200 --> 0:40:46.560
<v S4>And it's immensely popular in the trenches. There's a soldier

0:40:46.560 --> 0:40:49.080
<v S4>who writes to Buchan saying that he ripped through the

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:51.800
<v S4>whole thing in a single night when he was posted

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:54.680
<v S4>on the front lines. So it gets passed around. It's

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:58.279
<v S4>immensely popular, and it does give you this character of like,

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:02.480
<v S4>oh yes, here are what ordinary British citizens are capable of,

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:06.560
<v S4>which is foiling tremendous evil just through their sort of

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:11.040
<v S4>practical intelligence, common sense, and basic decency, and he goes

0:41:11.040 --> 0:41:14.040
<v S4>on to write multiple. He writes multiple novels throughout World

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:17.200
<v S4>War One that continue to be very popular and then continues,

0:41:17.200 --> 0:41:19.200
<v S4>of course, to write them after World War One as well.

0:41:19.360 --> 0:41:22.080
<v S4>But it's this immensely popular trench novel, and like I said,

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:24.719
<v S4>immensely popular work of propaganda fiction as well, when you

0:41:24.719 --> 0:41:25.640
<v S4>look at it that way.

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:29.960
<v S3>The description of 39 steps makes it all the all

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:34.200
<v S3>too clear why it became a Hitchcock film later on.

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:37.279
<v S4>Yes, Hitchcock film has been a miniseries, and now it's

0:41:37.280 --> 0:41:40.719
<v S4>also an extremely successful comedic play as well. It's just

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:42.760
<v S4>its afterlives are extraordinary.

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:47.240
<v S3>So if literature was providing a some, some a morale

0:41:47.280 --> 0:41:50.720
<v S3>boost or providing some reassurance to the home front during

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:53.960
<v S3>the beginning days and years. Well, beginning months of the war,

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:56.920
<v S3>let's say, where do we first begin to see some

0:41:56.920 --> 0:42:00.760
<v S3>cracks forming in that confidence story of the war?

0:42:01.000 --> 0:42:05.480
<v S4>You see, the cracks begin to form throughout 1915 as

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:08.520
<v S4>it becomes clear that this war is not going to

0:42:08.520 --> 0:42:12.120
<v S4>be one of a consistently moving front or these interesting

0:42:12.120 --> 0:42:15.640
<v S4>and and quick offenses that create rapid changes in the

0:42:15.640 --> 0:42:19.640
<v S4>conditions of the war. But they really expand significantly in

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:23.560
<v S4>1916 with the particularly devastating battles of that year that

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:26.880
<v S4>continue into 1917 as well. The long battle of the

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:31.000
<v S4>Somme in the summer in particular, is just especially horrifying

0:42:31.000 --> 0:42:34.320
<v S4>for the soldiers who were fighting. Uh, and numerous soldiers

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:37.040
<v S4>serve in that battle. The novelist David Jones, for instance,

0:42:37.040 --> 0:42:40.480
<v S4>himself points to 1916 as a year where it really

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:43.719
<v S4>felt like things changed. Famously. You have like the Christmas

0:42:43.719 --> 0:42:47.000
<v S4>truce of 1914, where the soldiers came out of their

0:42:47.000 --> 0:42:51.640
<v S4>trenches and played soccer in no man's land and exchanged gifts.

0:42:51.840 --> 0:42:55.760
<v S4>And and so that happened in 1914. More sporadic, smaller

0:42:55.760 --> 0:43:00.000
<v S4>versions of it happened in 1915. But after 1916, nothing

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:04.960
<v S4>like it ever happens again. Things harden. There's just more disillusionment.

0:43:04.960 --> 0:43:09.640
<v S4>There's far more suffering and, and things just aren't changing.

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:12.840
<v S4>And you just have such heavy casualties in these battles

0:43:12.840 --> 0:43:15.080
<v S4>where you have, for instance, a million casualties in a

0:43:15.080 --> 0:43:20.760
<v S4>single day of particularly terrible offenses. And just it's really

0:43:20.760 --> 0:43:23.560
<v S4>impossible to maintain that sort of bright and lively picture

0:43:23.560 --> 0:43:26.799
<v S4>of the war you get from something like the 39 steps.

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:29.719
<v S4>It's hard to maintain that sense of sort of clean,

0:43:29.719 --> 0:43:33.520
<v S4>idealized beauty that you get from Rupert Brooke. The soldiers

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:36.160
<v S4>are suffering from things like trench foot, which is what

0:43:36.160 --> 0:43:39.120
<v S4>happens when you're wearing all these wet shoes and wet

0:43:39.160 --> 0:43:43.880
<v S4>socks for days upon days. And and so, yes, the

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:46.719
<v S4>struggle of all of that just becomes more miserable when

0:43:46.719 --> 0:43:50.400
<v S4>your reality is rats and lice. It's hard to be

0:43:50.400 --> 0:43:53.560
<v S4>rosy about the situation that's happening and go, yes, indeed,

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:56.239
<v S4>this is the this is the idealized picture of the

0:43:56.239 --> 0:43:58.120
<v S4>world that we came here to fight for.

0:43:58.160 --> 0:44:00.399
<v S3>In part two, we'll talk about telling the truth about

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:04.040
<v S3>what's happening in those trenches during World War One. Doctor

0:44:04.040 --> 0:44:08.400
<v S3>Elizabeth Fredericks with us, associate professor of English at Hillsdale College,

0:44:08.400 --> 0:44:12.040
<v S3>talking about her course on the British literature of World

0:44:12.040 --> 0:44:15.040
<v S3>War One. Doctor Fredericks, thanks for joining us on the

0:44:15.040 --> 0:44:18.960
<v S3>Radio Free Hillsdale Hour. That will wrap up this edition

0:44:18.960 --> 0:44:22.720
<v S3>of the Radio Free Hillsdale Hour. Our thanks to Seth Barron.

0:44:22.719 --> 0:44:26.759
<v S3>His book weaponized the left's capture and destruction of America's

0:44:26.760 --> 0:44:33.080
<v S3>sacred institutions. And Doctor Elizabeth Fredericks from Hillsdale English Department. Remember,

0:44:33.080 --> 0:44:35.759
<v S3>you can hear new episodes every week on this station.

0:44:35.880 --> 0:44:39.080
<v S3>You also can find extended versions of some of our interviews,

0:44:39.080 --> 0:44:45.600
<v S3>or listen any time to the podcast. Find it@podcast.hillsdale.edu or

0:44:45.600 --> 0:44:50.480
<v S3>wherever you get your audio. Until next week, I'm Scott Bertram,

0:44:50.560 --> 0:44:54.440
<v S3>and this has been the radio free Hillsdale Hour.