WEBVTT - Suicidal Empathy and the West

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:11.360
<v S1>From the historic campus of Hillsdale College in Hillsdale, Michigan,

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:15.160
<v S1>where the good, the true and the beautiful are taught,

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:19.960
<v S1>nurtured and honored. This is the radio free Hillsdale Hour,

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.920
<v S1>bringing the activity and education of the college to listeners

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:25.320
<v S1>across the country.

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:29.560
<v S2>Socialism can never die. A new generations of imbeciles will

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:34.000
<v S2>come along that will fall prey to that reflex. That

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:39.160
<v S2>infantile logic is perfectly justified when I'm five years old

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:40.280
<v S2>in kindergarten.

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:43.880
<v S3>This is your host, Scott Bertram. Welcome to the Radio

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:48.760
<v S3>Free Hillsdale Hour. Part of the Hillsdale College Podcast Network.

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:52.600
<v S3>That was God Sword, author of the new book, Suicidal

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:56.400
<v S3>Empathy Dying to Be Kind. We'll go in depth with

0:00:56.400 --> 0:01:00.320
<v S3>him on today's program. Also later on, Doctor Stephen Smith

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.800
<v S3>from Hillsdale College. He's written a new book, The Last

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:07.720
<v S3>Riddle Advice on Living and Dying Well, from the imprisoned

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.480
<v S3>Saint Thomas More. First, very pleased to be joined now

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:16.360
<v S3>by God. He is an evolutionary behavioral scientist, a professor,

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:20.479
<v S3>a noted author. His previous book, The Parasitic Mind, is

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:25.000
<v S3>brand new. One is Suicidal Empathy, dying to be kind,

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:28.120
<v S3>and it is available now. God, thanks so much for

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:28.760
<v S3>joining us.

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:30.760
<v S2>Oh, thank you for having me, Scott. Great to be

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:31.120
<v S2>with you.

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:35.080
<v S3>Suicidal empathy. A good virtue gone bad, as the first

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:39.280
<v S3>chapter says. What's the problem with too much? And you're

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:42.000
<v S3>you're careful to say it's not empathy itself. You have

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:46.240
<v S3>a problem with. But what is wrong with too much empathy?

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:51.200
<v S2>So let me explain it using some evolutionary principles, and

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.040
<v S2>I'll draw first an analogy, and then it'll lead back

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:56.440
<v S2>to your question. So let's suppose that you and I, Scott,

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.960
<v S2>were to meet at a party and prior to you

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.240
<v S2>coming up to introduce yourself and shake my hand, I

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:07.600
<v S2>noticed that you had been incessantly sneezing into your hand.

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.920
<v S2>And so I had scanned the environment for potential threats,

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:15.200
<v S2>which is an evolutionarily adaptive mechanism. Then I shook your

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:19.080
<v S2>hand politely, and then I quietly and discreetly headed off

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:21.399
<v S2>to the bathroom to wash my hands because I don't

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:23.959
<v S2>want to catch your cold. So what started off as

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:28.360
<v S2>an adaptive process can now become maladaptive in the following way.

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:32.280
<v S2>If you suffer from germ contamination fears, which is a

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:35.960
<v S2>form of obsessive compulsive disorder, you end up sticking in

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:38.840
<v S2>the bathroom for the next eight hours until your skin

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:42.680
<v S2>is falling off, scalding hot water because you can't extricate

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:46.920
<v S2>yourself from that action once it begins. So what started

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:53.240
<v S2>off as an adaptive well-modulated well calibrated mechanism becomes maladaptive

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:57.520
<v S2>when it misfires. The exact same principle applies in the

0:02:57.610 --> 0:03:01.889
<v S2>distinction between empathy and suicidal empathy. Empathy, as you correctly

0:03:01.889 --> 0:03:05.490
<v S2>pointed in the introduction to your question, is a perfectly

0:03:05.490 --> 0:03:08.690
<v S2>laudable virtue. We are a social species for you and

0:03:08.690 --> 0:03:11.650
<v S2>I to have a meaningful conversation, I need to put

0:03:11.650 --> 0:03:14.490
<v S2>myself in your mind and vice versa. That's called cognitive

0:03:14.490 --> 0:03:18.890
<v S2>empathy or theory of mind. But like Aristotle explained to

0:03:18.930 --> 0:03:21.730
<v S2>us several thousand years ago via his golden mean, too

0:03:21.770 --> 0:03:24.690
<v S2>little of something is not good. If I have no empathy,

0:03:24.690 --> 0:03:28.010
<v S2>I'm a psychopath. Too much of something is not good,

0:03:28.010 --> 0:03:30.450
<v S2>and much of life is finding that sweet spot. So

0:03:30.450 --> 0:03:35.210
<v S2>suicidal empathy is really a three part monster. Number one,

0:03:35.210 --> 0:03:39.570
<v S2>it is hyper active. It hyper fires in the wrong

0:03:39.570 --> 0:03:44.410
<v S2>situations towards the wrong targets of your empathy. Once you

0:03:44.410 --> 0:03:47.010
<v S2>put those three together, you're well on your way to

0:03:47.050 --> 0:03:48.570
<v S2>ending Western civilization.

0:03:48.570 --> 0:03:51.170
<v S3>And you say it is never a good idea to

0:03:51.210 --> 0:03:54.770
<v S3>ignore the warning signs of reality. So what's the what's

0:03:54.770 --> 0:03:58.290
<v S3>the flashing light on the dashboard that's telling you that

0:03:58.330 --> 0:04:02.290
<v S3>far too many of us are suffering from suicidal empathy.

0:04:02.650 --> 0:04:07.050
<v S2>Well, of course, the book is about identifying endless manifestations

0:04:07.050 --> 0:04:10.170
<v S2>of suicidal empathy, both in terms of domestic policies and

0:04:10.170 --> 0:04:13.810
<v S2>foreign policies that speak to your question. But let's take

0:04:14.090 --> 0:04:18.450
<v S2>maybe the the most ominously flashing sign, although we can

0:04:18.490 --> 0:04:21.250
<v S2>then drill down to other examples if you'd like. Immigration

0:04:21.250 --> 0:04:24.409
<v S2>is is a wonderful thing if it is well calibrated.

0:04:24.410 --> 0:04:29.650
<v S2>Gad Saad is an immigrant who was granted status in

0:04:29.650 --> 0:04:33.650
<v S2>Canada because I was escaping the Lebanese Civil War. Elon

0:04:33.650 --> 0:04:36.770
<v S2>Musk is an immigrant who then has gone on. He

0:04:36.770 --> 0:04:38.850
<v S2>came to Canada first and then moved on to the

0:04:38.850 --> 0:04:43.489
<v S2>United States. The fact that Gartside and Elon Musk are immigrants,

0:04:43.490 --> 0:04:48.250
<v S2>as is Ahmed Muhammad Hussain, who is a frequent guest

0:04:48.250 --> 0:04:52.370
<v S2>in the summer camps of al Qaeda in Waziristan. We're

0:04:52.370 --> 0:04:56.970
<v S2>all called immigrants, but the likelihood of us equally contributing

0:04:57.010 --> 0:05:01.690
<v S2>to society, and equally likely in internalizing the ethos of

0:05:01.690 --> 0:05:06.730
<v S2>American exceptionalism, is not true. To be equal, suicidal empathy

0:05:06.770 --> 0:05:11.010
<v S2>says no. You're all immigrants. Therefore you all are equally

0:05:11.010 --> 0:05:14.810
<v S2>likely to share in the beautiful experiment called United States.

0:05:14.810 --> 0:05:18.690
<v S2>If you argue that there is a difference in the

0:05:18.690 --> 0:05:23.010
<v S2>likelihood of people coming in and contributing positively, then you

0:05:23.050 --> 0:05:26.370
<v S2>are a bigot. You're an islamophobe, you're a racist, you're

0:05:26.370 --> 0:05:29.770
<v S2>a and so on. And therefore, let's have open border policies,

0:05:29.770 --> 0:05:33.410
<v S2>because everyone should have the chance to contribute to the

0:05:33.410 --> 0:05:37.850
<v S2>great American experience. So open border policies is the fastest

0:05:37.850 --> 0:05:41.170
<v S2>way by which suicidal empathy is going to lead to

0:05:41.210 --> 0:05:42.289
<v S2>the demise of the West.

0:05:42.650 --> 0:05:46.450
<v S3>God is with us. His new book, Suicidal Empathy Dying

0:05:46.490 --> 0:05:49.810
<v S3>to Be Kind. So many of these chapters are wonderful.

0:05:49.810 --> 0:05:53.730
<v S3>I enjoyed the second chapter on forbidden knowledge and the

0:05:53.730 --> 0:05:57.210
<v S3>idea of calling things what they what they are. You

0:05:57.210 --> 0:06:00.210
<v S3>just talked about immigration. Are they illegal immigrants? Are they

0:06:00.210 --> 0:06:04.210
<v S3>illegal aliens? Are they simply undocumented? We have Brett Kavanaugh

0:06:04.210 --> 0:06:07.810
<v S3>has attempted assassin who for everyone is clearly a man.

0:06:08.050 --> 0:06:11.250
<v S3>And the media insists on calling him a woman because

0:06:11.250 --> 0:06:14.290
<v S3>he has asked them to. Why is it so important

0:06:14.290 --> 0:06:18.089
<v S3>to call things and identify things for what they are?

0:06:18.610 --> 0:06:23.890
<v S2>Right? Look, a foundational feature of being homo sapiens is

0:06:23.930 --> 0:06:27.330
<v S2>we have a prefrontal cortex that allows us to navigate

0:06:27.330 --> 0:06:32.130
<v S2>through daily reality in a way that is meaningful, right? So,

0:06:32.130 --> 0:06:37.330
<v S2>for example, the most defining feature of our respective personhood

0:06:37.330 --> 0:06:41.810
<v S2>is our biological sex. We are a sexually dimorphic, sexually

0:06:41.810 --> 0:06:47.050
<v S2>reproducing species consisting of two phenotypes called male and female.

0:06:47.330 --> 0:06:54.500
<v S2>That reality was known very clearly to the 117 billion

0:06:54.500 --> 0:06:57.940
<v S2>people that had lived on earth. That's an actual estimate

0:06:58.100 --> 0:07:02.580
<v S2>since Homo sapiens became a distinct species. So until 15

0:07:02.580 --> 0:07:07.780
<v S2>minutes ago, when we took progressive biology courses at Oberlin College,

0:07:07.980 --> 0:07:12.220
<v S2>we were able to fully adjudicate the very difficult conundrum

0:07:12.260 --> 0:07:16.020
<v S2>of identifying who's male or female. That's why our ancestors

0:07:16.020 --> 0:07:19.100
<v S2>were able to do. Or what is that thing called mating?

0:07:19.420 --> 0:07:23.340
<v S2>But 15 minutes ago, we realized that we had been

0:07:23.340 --> 0:07:29.460
<v S2>really succumbing to heteronormative reality. In saying that, I know

0:07:29.500 --> 0:07:32.300
<v S2>that if if you look at God's art, he's actually

0:07:32.300 --> 0:07:36.140
<v S2>male based on his clear visual markers. That's why I

0:07:36.140 --> 0:07:39.860
<v S2>need to put a pronoun thing in my bio so

0:07:39.860 --> 0:07:43.420
<v S2>that you know that I'm really male, not female. Now,

0:07:43.460 --> 0:07:49.700
<v S2>once we rape and murder truth for such a ridiculous context,

0:07:49.740 --> 0:07:53.180
<v S2>then all possible truths are up for grabs, and they

0:07:53.180 --> 0:07:57.300
<v S2>be and they become part of forbidden knowledge. Don't recognize

0:07:57.300 --> 0:08:01.580
<v S2>something as truthful if it has any chance of hurting

0:08:01.580 --> 0:08:05.780
<v S2>the feelings of some marginalized group. So what you're doing then, Scott,

0:08:05.780 --> 0:08:08.660
<v S2>forgive me for the long winded answer is you're applying

0:08:08.660 --> 0:08:14.420
<v S2>what's called a consequentialist ethic to deontological principle. Deontology are

0:08:14.420 --> 0:08:17.900
<v S2>absolute statements. So if I say it is never okay

0:08:17.900 --> 0:08:20.900
<v S2>to lie, that would be deontological statement. If I say

0:08:20.900 --> 0:08:24.260
<v S2>it is okay to lie, to spare the feelings of

0:08:24.260 --> 0:08:27.100
<v S2>someone I love, that would be a consequentialist statement for

0:08:27.100 --> 0:08:29.580
<v S2>most things in life. It makes perfect sense for us

0:08:29.580 --> 0:08:34.580
<v S2>to be consequentialist, but for foundational principles such as freedom

0:08:34.580 --> 0:08:38.579
<v S2>of speech, freedom of inquiry, presumption of innocence those have

0:08:38.580 --> 0:08:42.860
<v S2>to be deontological. Once I apply a consequentialist lens to that,

0:08:43.780 --> 0:08:45.020
<v S2>we're off and running.

0:08:46.059 --> 0:08:49.260
<v S3>God is with us. His book, Suicidal Empathy Dying to

0:08:49.300 --> 0:08:54.380
<v S3>Be Kind A Chapter on cultures and you argue not

0:08:54.380 --> 0:08:59.580
<v S3>all cultures are equal. Is it harmful for us not

0:08:59.580 --> 0:09:03.939
<v S3>to acknowledge that perhaps the West is best?

0:09:05.420 --> 0:09:08.220
<v S2>Well, it's very harmful, right? I mean, if you were

0:09:08.460 --> 0:09:13.380
<v S2>an individual going to see a therapist for a pathological

0:09:13.380 --> 0:09:17.579
<v S2>lack of self-esteem, no one would say that's a terrible

0:09:17.580 --> 0:09:20.100
<v S2>thing that that that you actually are going to see

0:09:20.100 --> 0:09:24.900
<v S2>a therapist. It's wonderfully healthy for you to self-flagellate all

0:09:24.900 --> 0:09:28.940
<v S2>day long about how insignificant of a human being you are.

0:09:28.980 --> 0:09:30.940
<v S2>It makes perfect sense for you to go see a

0:09:30.940 --> 0:09:36.100
<v S2>therapist who hopefully will extricate you out of your personal self-loathing.

0:09:36.220 --> 0:09:41.300
<v S2>But if you apply that exact self-loathing to the West,

0:09:41.300 --> 0:09:45.300
<v S2>then you become someone who we all want to invite

0:09:45.300 --> 0:09:49.620
<v S2>to the progressive, cool kids parties in Manhattan. Because we're

0:09:49.620 --> 0:09:52.780
<v S2>defined in our progressive ethos by the fact that we

0:09:52.780 --> 0:09:56.819
<v S2>recognize that all cultures are equal, except the West is

0:09:56.820 --> 0:09:59.860
<v S2>less equal than the other cultures. Now what? What is

0:09:59.860 --> 0:10:04.699
<v S2>the parasitic idea that allows this kind of nonsense to flourish?

0:10:04.740 --> 0:10:07.620
<v S2>I discussed this, as you kindly pointed out in the

0:10:07.620 --> 0:10:10.580
<v S2>intro in my one of my previous books, The Parasitic Mind,

0:10:10.620 --> 0:10:15.500
<v S2>where I talk about cultural relativism as a parasitic idea.

0:10:15.540 --> 0:10:21.100
<v S2>Cultural relativism renders me impotent to make value judgments about

0:10:21.100 --> 0:10:25.700
<v S2>the practices and beliefs of another culture, especially, God forbid,

0:10:25.700 --> 0:10:28.620
<v S2>if that other culture is not a white culture. So

0:10:28.620 --> 0:10:31.660
<v S2>if the other culture wishes to cut off the clitorises

0:10:31.660 --> 0:10:34.500
<v S2>of five year old girls, shut up. Racist. If the

0:10:34.500 --> 0:10:38.300
<v S2>other culture wants to engage in child brides, shut up racist.

0:10:38.300 --> 0:10:41.660
<v S2>If the other culture wants to stone women to death,

0:10:41.660 --> 0:10:44.380
<v S2>shut up. Racist. Well, now you could see how if

0:10:44.380 --> 0:10:49.860
<v S2>I internalize the parasitic idea of cultural relativism that creates

0:10:49.860 --> 0:10:54.220
<v S2>the fertile ground for my open border immigration policy, because

0:10:54.220 --> 0:10:57.500
<v S2>I'm no longer able to say, these folks from these

0:10:57.500 --> 0:11:00.900
<v S2>cultures are more likely to assimilate than those folks from

0:11:00.900 --> 0:11:01.660
<v S2>that culture.

0:11:01.900 --> 0:11:05.900
<v S3>We have two interesting, I want to say, experiments, but

0:11:05.940 --> 0:11:07.939
<v S3>we have two interesting things happening when it comes to

0:11:07.980 --> 0:11:11.620
<v S3>the world of criminal justice and some of our urban areas.

0:11:11.660 --> 0:11:14.820
<v S3>There is an increase in policing, an increase in arrests,

0:11:14.820 --> 0:11:17.620
<v S3>and thus we see a decrease in crime, particularly in

0:11:17.620 --> 0:11:21.900
<v S3>public transit situations in Washington, D.C., where President Trump has

0:11:21.940 --> 0:11:25.339
<v S3>had some activity. On the other hand, we have candidates

0:11:25.340 --> 0:11:27.740
<v S3>and some who are winning primaries here in the United States,

0:11:27.740 --> 0:11:31.220
<v S3>arguing for no prisons and no police, and making every

0:11:31.220 --> 0:11:34.460
<v S3>excuse possible for those who are breaking the law. As

0:11:34.460 --> 0:11:37.860
<v S3>a chapter here where you say reflexively mitigating the actions

0:11:37.860 --> 0:11:42.060
<v S3>of violent criminals by proposing external root causes, it's not

0:11:42.059 --> 0:11:44.700
<v S3>that person's problem, not that person's fault that he or

0:11:44.700 --> 0:11:47.670
<v S3>she is doing what they are doing. I've seen stories

0:11:47.670 --> 0:11:49.949
<v S3>recently where there are people who are attacked, who are

0:11:49.950 --> 0:11:52.110
<v S3>hesitant to press charges. They don't want to have the

0:11:52.110 --> 0:11:55.870
<v S3>person who have who has harmed them to face consequences.

0:11:55.990 --> 0:12:01.429
<v S3>Why is there such this tendency to want to overlook

0:12:01.429 --> 0:12:04.270
<v S3>people who clearly want to do harm, either to you

0:12:04.270 --> 0:12:07.030
<v S3>personally or to society at large?

0:12:07.270 --> 0:12:11.270
<v S2>Because in their view, the suicidal, empathetic folks. There is

0:12:11.270 --> 0:12:15.990
<v S2>a competing hierarchy of more of a moral calculus and

0:12:15.990 --> 0:12:20.310
<v S2>the highest aspiration. As I stroke my luxuriant hair and

0:12:20.309 --> 0:12:23.750
<v S2>looking at my reflection in the mirror of moral preening,

0:12:23.990 --> 0:12:29.350
<v S2>is that I do not ever punish felons of color

0:12:29.350 --> 0:12:31.670
<v S2>because I'm a good person. Now, why is that? What's

0:12:31.670 --> 0:12:34.430
<v S2>the reflex there? This is why I use the new

0:12:34.429 --> 0:12:38.150
<v S2>term that I introduced blank slate felons. Blank slate comes

0:12:38.150 --> 0:12:42.030
<v S2>from another parasitic idea that I discussed in the parasitic

0:12:42.030 --> 0:12:47.069
<v S2>mind called social constructivism. Social constructivism argues that all realities

0:12:47.070 --> 0:12:51.189
<v S2>that you see before you are. Due to socialization. We

0:12:51.230 --> 0:12:55.709
<v S2>are born tabula rasa, empty slate, blank slate. And it

0:12:55.710 --> 0:13:01.670
<v S2>is only the vagaries of our idiosyncratic life trajectories that

0:13:01.670 --> 0:13:05.950
<v S2>make us who we become. We're all born with equal potentiality,

0:13:05.990 --> 0:13:08.710
<v S2>equal likelihood of criminality, and so on and so forth.

0:13:08.790 --> 0:13:13.429
<v S2>So now imagine if you internalize that ethos, then you

0:13:13.429 --> 0:13:18.990
<v S2>argue that someone who is born black in the terribly

0:13:18.990 --> 0:13:23.590
<v S2>white supremacist society known as the United States has already

0:13:23.590 --> 0:13:27.830
<v S2>been existentially punished. So now you're going to tell me

0:13:27.830 --> 0:13:31.429
<v S2>that you're going to put this noble felon of color

0:13:31.670 --> 0:13:37.150
<v S2>in prison. If only he committed 193 previous crimes, don't

0:13:37.150 --> 0:13:39.590
<v S2>you think you should be a good person and give

0:13:39.590 --> 0:13:42.470
<v S2>him a second chance? And by second chance, I mean

0:13:42.470 --> 0:13:47.910
<v S2>194th Opportunity to make good in his life. So because

0:13:47.910 --> 0:13:50.510
<v S2>I'm a good person who bathes in the infinity pool

0:13:50.510 --> 0:13:54.550
<v S2>of suicidal empathy, I don't think that it serves anybody

0:13:54.550 --> 0:13:58.270
<v S2>any purpose to to put a felon of color in prison.

0:13:58.429 --> 0:14:01.030
<v S3>God. God is with us. We'll continue in a moment

0:14:01.030 --> 0:14:04.830
<v S3>with more on his new book, Suicidal Empathy. We are

0:14:04.830 --> 0:14:08.589
<v S3>past July 4th, but we can still celebrate the Declaration

0:14:08.590 --> 0:14:13.710
<v S3>of Independence and our founding 250 years ago. You might

0:14:13.710 --> 0:14:17.790
<v S3>remember me telling you about revolutionary America. Well, if you

0:14:17.790 --> 0:14:21.190
<v S3>missed it in theaters, now you can find it online.

0:14:21.550 --> 0:14:25.350
<v S3>Search for Revolutionary America on YouTube. It is the first

0:14:25.350 --> 0:14:29.230
<v S3>documentary about the American Revolution that you can trust from

0:14:29.230 --> 0:14:33.510
<v S3>Hillsdale College. 250 years ago, a group of ordinary people

0:14:33.510 --> 0:14:38.910
<v S3>did something very, very extraordinary. With America's anniversary now past us,

0:14:38.950 --> 0:14:41.910
<v S3>we still have time to remember exactly what they did

0:14:41.950 --> 0:14:47.510
<v S3>and why it still matters. Watch Revolutionary America from Hillsdale

0:14:47.510 --> 0:14:52.310
<v S3>College now on YouTube. We continue with God sod. His

0:14:52.310 --> 0:14:57.109
<v S3>new book is Suicidal Empathy Dying to Be Kind. God,

0:14:57.390 --> 0:15:00.150
<v S3>as you explain, I think in the introduction early in

0:15:00.150 --> 0:15:04.790
<v S3>the book, there is narcissism, existential guilt that is driving

0:15:04.790 --> 0:15:08.990
<v S3>suicidal empathy. And people like the ones you describe see

0:15:08.990 --> 0:15:13.230
<v S3>this as penance for their unearned advantage in that way.

0:15:13.310 --> 0:15:17.910
<v S3>Is there any limit to that kind of suicidal empathy?

0:15:18.310 --> 0:15:21.830
<v S2>No. I mean, so and let me let me describe

0:15:21.830 --> 0:15:24.350
<v S2>another term that I use in the book that I

0:15:24.350 --> 0:15:26.630
<v S2>think would be very apropos to what you just asked.

0:15:26.910 --> 0:15:32.110
<v S2>I often will call someone bathing in just completely fatal

0:15:32.110 --> 0:15:35.590
<v S2>suicidal empathy. I call them a wood cricket. Why do

0:15:35.590 --> 0:15:39.470
<v S2>I do that? Because a wood cricket is an insect

0:15:39.470 --> 0:15:43.840
<v S2>that wants nothing to do with water. It avoids water,

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:48.120
<v S2>but when it is parasitized by a parasite called a

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:52.040
<v S2>hair worm, the hair worm needs the wood cricket to

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:57.240
<v S2>jump into water happily and merrily, committing suicide in order

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:00.760
<v S2>to suit the reproductive interests of the hair worm, which

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:04.760
<v S2>could only complete its reproductive cycle in water. So it

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:08.640
<v S2>is literally taking it to the extreme. I'm willing to

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:11.200
<v S2>give up my life in this case if I'm a

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:15.800
<v S2>wood cricket because I've been parasitized. Okay, well, let's apply

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:19.840
<v S2>it to the human context. I and there are endless

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:22.480
<v S2>examples of that, but I'll give one that's very powerful.

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.040
<v S2>A woman is intercepted on the street by one of

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:29.560
<v S2>those street interviewers. I think it's in Manchester. She's at

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:34.320
<v S2>a free, free Palestine, you know, eradicate the Jews in

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:38.320
<v S2>Palestine and so on. And she's she's clearly a British woman. Uh,

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:42.240
<v S2>so the interviewer says, oh, you're your free, free Palestine. Okay, well,

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:44.680
<v S2>do you know what they do to gay people and

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.920
<v S2>queer people in Palestine? And she goes, yes, I know

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:51.680
<v S2>I'm queer myself. So then he's taken aback and he says, well,

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:54.560
<v S2>what do you mean? So you're you're supporting the society

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:58.360
<v S2>that if you were there, they would kill you. She goes, yes,

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:00.920
<v S2>he goes, but how could that be possible? He's he's

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.800
<v S2>really incredulous. He doesn't understand it. He hadn't read my

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:06.640
<v S2>book yet. And so and so then he and then

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:10.400
<v S2>she says, well, I don't care just the. Just because

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:13.840
<v S2>they're going to kill me doesn't mean that they're not

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:18.480
<v S2>worthy of my support. They have a right to exist. Well,

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:21.520
<v S2>that's what a human form would cricket looks like. So

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:24.560
<v S2>there is no end to my suicidal empathy. I'm willing

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:28.119
<v S2>to die at that altar once I've been parasitized by

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:29.240
<v S2>that mindset.

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:31.560
<v S3>That leads me to a question about the chapter on

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:36.080
<v S3>meritocracy scientific knowledge. You say that it's tantamount to white

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:40.560
<v S3>supremacy in the minds of those who are suicidally Empathetic.

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.120
<v S3>And yet, if we look at the areas in which

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:47.040
<v S3>those things don't matter anymore, you point out aviation people

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:51.160
<v S3>flying our planes, uh, medicine at UCLA has come under

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:54.520
<v S3>fire for their admission practices and how they gauge who

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:57.680
<v S3>is going to be admitted to their doctoral programs. These

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:02.880
<v S3>are areas in which we all can bear the consequences.

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:05.720
<v S3>It's not some, some, some thing out in space that

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:07.800
<v S3>has no bearing on our life. The people who fly

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:10.240
<v S3>our planes, the people who diagnose our illnesses, the people

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:13.080
<v S3>who are practicing surgery on us. These are people who

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:16.960
<v S3>are going through this idea that meritocracy and scientific knowledge

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:22.240
<v S3>itself are white supremacy. Do people understand the potential consequences

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:25.520
<v S3>of that and not care? Like that woman you explained?

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:30.080
<v S2>Uh, well, in academia, they don't care. The average person

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:34.119
<v S2>walking in the street understands how insane this is, but

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:36.760
<v S2>they feel as though they don't have the power to

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:39.800
<v S2>affect change, which is simply not true. If you speak out.

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:43.600
<v S2>The silent majority. The tests. All this stuff. But they

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:47.359
<v S2>are completely locked in. A tragedy of the commons. You

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:50.720
<v S2>know what? Let God speak out. He's a big boy.

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:53.560
<v S2>He can handle it on our behalf. I simply have

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.760
<v S2>too many costs to bear if I actually speak out

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:59.760
<v S2>against this nonsense. God can handle it on our behalf.

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:04.040
<v S2>But the reality is. I mean, it's aviation. It's medicine.

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:07.760
<v S2>But let's discuss another one. How about firefighting? How about

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:12.600
<v S2>the deputy chief of the L.A. Fire Department, who is

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:18.320
<v S2>a obese woman of color, who is also queer, explaining

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:21.360
<v S2>to the rest of us simpletons that listen when when

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:24.919
<v S2>you're going somewhere, you know, to save someone from a

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:28.480
<v S2>burning fire, you want to know that the person who's

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:32.840
<v S2>saving you looks like you. And then using my now

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:38.480
<v S2>legendary satire, I said, absolutely right. When you are an obese,

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:42.160
<v S2>queer woman who weighs as much as a California seal.

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:47.520
<v S2>You don't want some tall, muscular, heterosexual firefighter saving you

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:53.280
<v S2>because he can't understand your plight. You want an equally immobile, fat,

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:57.720
<v S2>queer lesbian to get you out of your predicament, because

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:01.439
<v S2>then she really understands your plight. That person who uttered

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:06.080
<v S2>those words, Scott, was not being satirical. She has fully

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:11.440
<v S2>internalized the cancer known as diversity, inclusion, and equity. So

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:14.879
<v S2>from her vantage point, what she said makes perfect sense.

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:18.399
<v S3>God is with us. Suicidal empathy is his new book,

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:20.880
<v S3>Dying to Be Kind. We have to talk a bit

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:24.040
<v S3>about socialism and the rise of some of these DSA

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:27.880
<v S3>candidates here in the United States, recently winning primaries in

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:31.480
<v S3>New York, but also winning mayoral elections across the country.

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:35.440
<v S3>You say in the book that Socialism's rise is fueled

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:40.609
<v S3>by the allure of empathetic fairness. Would you point to

0:20:40.650 --> 0:20:44.370
<v S3>that as the primary factor in what we've seen over

0:20:44.369 --> 0:20:47.970
<v S3>the past few years, and perhaps this year, in particular

0:20:48.290 --> 0:20:52.010
<v S3>with these DSA Democratic Socialists of America candidates winning and

0:20:52.010 --> 0:20:56.650
<v S3>the the allure of socialism among some of our younger,

0:20:56.890 --> 0:21:01.530
<v S3>college educated Americans, but also some of our wealthier white

0:21:01.570 --> 0:21:03.570
<v S3>liberal Americans as well.

0:21:04.490 --> 0:21:09.650
<v S2>Exactly. Right now, it's a one two punch. So it's first,

0:21:09.650 --> 0:21:13.889
<v S2>one of the seven deadly sins is envy. In the

0:21:13.890 --> 0:21:19.770
<v S2>Ten Commandments, we have the allure of covetousness, right? Or look, he,

0:21:19.890 --> 0:21:24.090
<v S2>that bastard neighbor of mine has that, uh, Porsche, and

0:21:24.090 --> 0:21:27.969
<v S2>I don't have it. Right. That's positional economy. I compare

0:21:27.970 --> 0:21:32.649
<v S2>myself to the other. So take envy. Which moral philosophers

0:21:32.650 --> 0:21:36.810
<v S2>and theologians have known as a alluring trapped as part

0:21:36.810 --> 0:21:40.610
<v S2>of the architecture of human beings, and then coupled that,

0:21:40.810 --> 0:21:45.810
<v S2>coupled that with the supposed empathy of creating equality. It's

0:21:45.810 --> 0:21:50.570
<v S2>simply unfair. If I'm a suicidally empathetic person that Elon

0:21:50.570 --> 0:21:55.010
<v S2>Musk has so much money, when someone else who works

0:21:55.010 --> 0:21:58.810
<v S2>very hard doesn't have enough to necessarily put food on

0:21:58.810 --> 0:22:04.730
<v S2>the table, that existential reality is grossly unfair. So why

0:22:04.730 --> 0:22:09.530
<v S2>don't we have an empathetic overlord? Because they are seeking

0:22:09.570 --> 0:22:14.929
<v S2>to maximize existential fairness. Come and take all the money

0:22:14.930 --> 0:22:19.890
<v S2>from those gluttonous, wealthy people and give it to other people. Therefore,

0:22:19.890 --> 0:22:23.690
<v S2>we could all live in this wonderful unicornia where we're

0:22:23.690 --> 0:22:28.250
<v S2>all equally miserable. Right. And so it is absolutely rooted

0:22:28.250 --> 0:22:32.330
<v S2>in that reflex that socialism can never die. That's why

0:22:32.330 --> 0:22:36.690
<v S2>I call it akin to the phoenix that always arises

0:22:36.690 --> 0:22:40.530
<v S2>from the ashes. Because as long as we'll be reproducing

0:22:40.530 --> 0:22:45.210
<v S2>new members of Homo sapiens, a new generations of imbeciles

0:22:45.210 --> 0:22:49.010
<v S2>will come along that will fall prey to that reflex.

0:22:49.010 --> 0:22:54.250
<v S2>But now here's the issue, Scott. That infantile logic is

0:22:54.250 --> 0:22:58.370
<v S2>perfectly justified when I'm five years old in kindergarten, this

0:22:58.369 --> 0:23:01.290
<v S2>is when I learned that sharing is caring. It's not

0:23:01.290 --> 0:23:05.290
<v S2>right for Johnny to have four toys while Billy is

0:23:05.290 --> 0:23:08.689
<v S2>sitting twiddling his thumbs with no toys. So we teach

0:23:08.690 --> 0:23:12.410
<v S2>them to internalize the message of sharing is caring. But

0:23:12.410 --> 0:23:16.090
<v S2>then once I become older and I'm slapped by this

0:23:16.090 --> 0:23:20.209
<v S2>thing called reality, I understand that human beings are a

0:23:20.210 --> 0:23:23.770
<v S2>hierarchical species. Now, why is that important? Because some of

0:23:23.770 --> 0:23:28.330
<v S2>us are taller or shorter, harder working or less harder working.

0:23:28.330 --> 0:23:34.330
<v S2>So we are not communistic in our inherent human nature. E.O. Wilson,

0:23:34.330 --> 0:23:39.129
<v S2>the famous Harvard biologist who studied social ants. Social ants

0:23:39.130 --> 0:23:42.810
<v S2>are communistic. There is a reproductive queen, and then there

0:23:42.850 --> 0:23:47.450
<v S2>is an indistinguishable class of worker ants and soldier ants.

0:23:47.450 --> 0:23:51.169
<v S2>So it is literally the case that social ants are communistic.

0:23:51.490 --> 0:23:54.770
<v S2>When he was asked Professor Wilson, what are your thoughts

0:23:54.770 --> 0:23:58.770
<v S2>on socialism slash communism, he gave arguably the greatest answer

0:23:58.770 --> 0:24:03.170
<v S2>of all time. He said, great idea. Wrong species. So

0:24:03.170 --> 0:24:08.369
<v S2>when you are constantly imposing a socio political economic system

0:24:08.530 --> 0:24:13.490
<v S2>that is incongruent with our phylogenetic history, it shouldn't be

0:24:13.490 --> 0:24:17.369
<v S2>a surprise that it will always fail wherever it's tried.

0:24:17.369 --> 0:24:23.010
<v S2>But apparently Bernie Sanders and occasional cortex AOC will usher

0:24:23.050 --> 0:24:26.570
<v S2>the real socialism once they take power from the rest

0:24:26.570 --> 0:24:26.970
<v S2>of us.

0:24:27.290 --> 0:24:30.369
<v S3>God is with us. Suicidal empathy is the new book.

0:24:30.410 --> 0:24:34.219
<v S3>You say that Donald Trump's second election does not spell

0:24:34.220 --> 0:24:37.419
<v S3>the end of the lunacy that has gripped the West.

0:24:37.619 --> 0:24:42.900
<v S3>Is there any long term change that you see from

0:24:42.940 --> 0:24:47.580
<v S3>the president's second term that can't be undercut by someone

0:24:47.580 --> 0:24:51.100
<v S3>else coming to power, someone else becoming president for from

0:24:51.100 --> 0:24:51.980
<v S3>a different party?

0:24:52.859 --> 0:24:55.460
<v S2>The you want me to lie or give you the honest.

0:24:55.500 --> 0:24:56.780
<v S3>Give us the honest truth.

0:24:57.020 --> 0:24:59.740
<v S2>No. The fact that Donald Trump has come in in

0:24:59.740 --> 0:25:02.820
<v S2>the same way that he signed an executive order ending

0:25:02.820 --> 0:25:06.820
<v S2>the trance lunacy in collegiate sports, the next person comes

0:25:06.820 --> 0:25:09.700
<v S2>in and reverses it through the same mechanism. This is

0:25:09.700 --> 0:25:13.300
<v S2>why I said exactly when you led with your question,

0:25:13.300 --> 0:25:16.580
<v S2>that we can be we can breathe a sigh of

0:25:16.580 --> 0:25:20.700
<v S2>relief momentarily, that it was Donald Trump that won and

0:25:20.700 --> 0:25:23.740
<v S2>not the opponent, because then that would have just, you know,

0:25:23.780 --> 0:25:26.540
<v S2>doubled and tripled down on all the lunacy. But he

0:25:26.540 --> 0:25:31.980
<v S2>only serves as a temporary temporal doorstop for in order

0:25:31.980 --> 0:25:37.100
<v S2>for the problem to go away forever. The parasitic ideas

0:25:37.100 --> 0:25:41.180
<v S2>that eventually lead to suicidal empathy have to be vanquished.

0:25:41.220 --> 0:25:46.020
<v S2>Now that doesn't happen by having one president serve one

0:25:46.020 --> 0:25:50.540
<v S2>term and hopefully getting rid of the woke monster. You really. Now,

0:25:50.580 --> 0:25:53.100
<v S2>let me just kind of give a timestamp on some

0:25:53.100 --> 0:25:56.260
<v S2>of these parasitic ideas, depending on which parasitic idea we're

0:25:56.260 --> 0:26:01.740
<v S2>speaking of. These spawned and flourished on university campuses somewhere

0:26:01.740 --> 0:26:04.780
<v S2>between 50 to 100 years ago. So, for example, cultural

0:26:04.780 --> 0:26:09.940
<v S2>relativism was developed by a cultural anthropologist named Franz Boas.

0:26:09.940 --> 0:26:15.340
<v S2>That's about 100 years ago. The postmodernist, uh, monster as

0:26:15.340 --> 0:26:18.219
<v S2>a parasitic idea was really developed by a bunch of

0:26:18.220 --> 0:26:22.980
<v S2>French philosophers Jacques Derrida, Jacques Lacan, Michel Foucault. This is

0:26:22.980 --> 0:26:25.540
<v S2>about 50 or 60 years ago now. I'd like to

0:26:25.540 --> 0:26:28.580
<v S2>think that it won't take 50 to 100 years to

0:26:28.619 --> 0:26:32.340
<v S2>eradicate that which took that long to flourish. But it's

0:26:32.340 --> 0:26:34.700
<v S2>not going to start and end with Donald Trump, I'm

0:26:34.700 --> 0:26:35.379
<v S2>afraid to say.

0:26:35.700 --> 0:26:38.140
<v S3>God. God is the author of the new book, Suicidal

0:26:38.140 --> 0:26:42.100
<v S3>Empathy Dying to Be Kind. It's available now. And there's

0:26:42.100 --> 0:26:44.740
<v S3>the cover. God, thanks so much for joining us here

0:26:44.740 --> 0:26:47.020
<v S3>on the Radio Free Hillsdale Hour.

0:26:47.740 --> 0:26:49.700
<v S2>Great chatting with you. Thank you for having me, Scott.

0:26:49.980 --> 0:26:53.660
<v S3>Up next, Doctor Stephen Smith from Hillsdale College will discuss

0:26:53.660 --> 0:26:56.580
<v S3>his new book on the advice from the imprisoned Saint

0:26:56.619 --> 0:27:00.860
<v S3>Thomas More. I'm Scott Bertram. This is the radio free

0:27:00.900 --> 0:27:26.460
<v S3>Hillsdale Hour. Welcome back to the radio free Hillsdale Hour.

0:27:26.500 --> 0:27:29.500
<v S3>I'm Scott Bertram. Be sure to follow us on Acts

0:27:29.540 --> 0:27:34.340
<v S3>at Hillsdale Radio for updated show and guest information. We're

0:27:34.340 --> 0:27:37.100
<v S3>joined by Doctor Stephen Smith. He is Temple family chair

0:27:37.100 --> 0:27:41.580
<v S3>of English literature at Hillsdale College, also dean of Humanities here.

0:27:41.820 --> 0:27:45.619
<v S3>And his new book is The Last Riddle Advice on

0:27:45.619 --> 0:27:49.580
<v S3>Living and Dying Well from the Imprisoned Saint Thomas More.

0:27:50.020 --> 0:27:51.860
<v S3>Doctor Smith, thanks so much for joining us.

0:27:52.100 --> 0:27:54.300
<v S4>Thank you for having me, Scott. Pleasure to be here.

0:27:54.340 --> 0:27:58.860
<v S3>Interesting, uh, interesting conversation today about these letters from Thomas

0:27:58.900 --> 0:28:02.220
<v S3>Moore that he wrote in your analysis of them. For

0:28:02.220 --> 0:28:04.580
<v S3>our listeners who might not be so familiar, we always

0:28:04.580 --> 0:28:07.659
<v S3>like to begin by cluing them in. So who was

0:28:07.660 --> 0:28:09.940
<v S3>Thomas Moore and why was he even imprisoned?

0:28:11.180 --> 0:28:16.900
<v S4>He was the famous English statesman, father and friend who

0:28:16.900 --> 0:28:24.459
<v S4>lived from 1478 to 1535, and he was an author

0:28:24.460 --> 0:28:28.380
<v S4>who was famous for writing Utopia. He was also speaker

0:28:28.380 --> 0:28:32.260
<v S4>of the House, Lord Chancellor of England. And then in

0:28:32.260 --> 0:28:37.619
<v S4>the events of the 1530s, he was imprisoned for refusing

0:28:37.660 --> 0:28:42.180
<v S4>to take the oath of the act of succession that

0:28:42.900 --> 0:28:46.420
<v S4>had come his way through Henry and Henry's ministers. He

0:28:46.420 --> 0:28:50.580
<v S4>was imprisoned in the Tower of London in 1534, and

0:28:50.580 --> 0:28:55.460
<v S4>then on July 1st, 1535, he was put on trial,

0:28:55.460 --> 0:28:58.460
<v S4>found guilty of malicious treason, and he was executed on

0:28:58.500 --> 0:29:01.500
<v S4>Tower Hill on July 6th, 1535.

0:29:01.540 --> 0:29:04.620
<v S3>Also mentioned that there's a series of videos at Thomas

0:29:04.660 --> 0:29:08.340
<v S3>More studies.org, a video series that Doctor Smith's involved in.

0:29:08.380 --> 0:29:10.260
<v S3>You can check out. We will find out a bit

0:29:10.260 --> 0:29:14.420
<v S3>more about that later. These writings in The Last Riddle,

0:29:14.860 --> 0:29:19.340
<v S3>you describe them as meditations on life's ultimate questions, which

0:29:19.340 --> 0:29:22.260
<v S3>like to become very clear when you're in his position.

0:29:22.540 --> 0:29:25.500
<v S3>Why do you think these final months of his life

0:29:25.500 --> 0:29:28.910
<v S3>still fascinate readers some 500 years later.

0:29:28.950 --> 0:29:30.870
<v S4>Well, the idea of the book is that you can

0:29:30.870 --> 0:29:36.510
<v S4>begin on the morning of Moore's first interrogation and follow

0:29:36.550 --> 0:29:40.990
<v S4>his footsteps, his mind, his heart, through these letters and prayers,

0:29:40.990 --> 0:29:44.190
<v S4>right to the trial and to his death. And I

0:29:44.190 --> 0:29:48.830
<v S4>think that the reason the tower is so fascinating to,

0:29:48.910 --> 0:29:52.550
<v S4>to readers and to history is that it really shows

0:29:52.550 --> 0:29:56.270
<v S4>us a great man at the testing point of his life.

0:29:57.110 --> 0:30:01.030
<v S4>Moore was in his 50s at this point. He had

0:30:01.030 --> 0:30:04.910
<v S4>held many offices. He was famous. But this really is

0:30:04.910 --> 0:30:08.030
<v S4>the testing point of his whole life, of his integrity

0:30:08.670 --> 0:30:13.070
<v S4>and questions of principle and compromise and virtue come up.

0:30:13.230 --> 0:30:17.630
<v S4>But also, it's a family drama, a drama of friendship

0:30:18.110 --> 0:30:20.950
<v S4>and a drama about the rule of law as well.

0:30:21.110 --> 0:30:24.030
<v S4>So the story of the Tower of London and the

0:30:24.070 --> 0:30:31.190
<v S4>plight of this great man for those 15 months is powerful, fascinating, unforgettable.

0:30:31.230 --> 0:30:34.590
<v S3>Before he became a martyr, you mentioned all these things

0:30:34.590 --> 0:30:39.030
<v S3>Moore had done and accomplished lawyer, statesman, diplomat, husband, father.

0:30:39.190 --> 0:30:43.710
<v S3>Do we see a particular side of Thomas Moore emerge

0:30:43.710 --> 0:30:46.830
<v S3>clearly in these writings inside the Last Riddle?

0:30:46.870 --> 0:30:50.350
<v S4>I think that Moore is among the most versatile authors

0:30:50.350 --> 0:30:53.510
<v S4>I have studied personally. So yes, he has many sides,

0:30:54.190 --> 0:31:00.150
<v S4>kind of many minded, many sided, versatile man. And I

0:31:00.150 --> 0:31:05.390
<v S4>think that in the tower letters, um, the lawyer certainly

0:31:05.390 --> 0:31:10.270
<v S4>comes out in regard to the rule of law. Um,

0:31:11.070 --> 0:31:17.150
<v S4>on the more personal side, the fatherhood of Thomas Moore, uh,

0:31:17.190 --> 0:31:22.710
<v S4>comes out and his lifelong commitment to friendship. Finally, one

0:31:22.710 --> 0:31:25.790
<v S4>of the great Yale scholars of Thomas More. Louis Martz

0:31:26.230 --> 0:31:30.630
<v S4>has called the letters in particular some of More's greatest

0:31:30.630 --> 0:31:34.390
<v S4>literary masterpieces. So there's an art and a beauty to

0:31:34.430 --> 0:31:38.950
<v S4>the writing that I think makes them, um, just unforgettable.

0:31:39.430 --> 0:31:42.030
<v S3>Talking with Doctor Stephen Smith, his new book, The Last

0:31:42.030 --> 0:31:45.469
<v S3>Riddle Advice on Living and Dying Well from the imprisoned

0:31:45.510 --> 0:31:49.510
<v S3>Saint Thomas More. When you read these letters inside the

0:31:49.510 --> 0:31:53.110
<v S3>last riddle, you. You do notice that there's warmth and

0:31:53.110 --> 0:31:56.950
<v S3>there's humor. Uh, even for a man in More's position,

0:31:56.950 --> 0:32:01.190
<v S3>how does he remain cheerful while facing his ultimate end?

0:32:02.070 --> 0:32:04.950
<v S4>Well, the title refers to the last riddle, refers to

0:32:04.990 --> 0:32:07.590
<v S4>the riddle he told his daughter he was living in

0:32:07.590 --> 0:32:10.510
<v S4>the Tower of London, which is how a man may

0:32:10.510 --> 0:32:14.430
<v S4>lose his head and have no harm. Mhm. So I,

0:32:14.750 --> 0:32:17.710
<v S4>joking with the production team at Word on Fire. It's

0:32:17.710 --> 0:32:22.110
<v S4>a bit of a guide to decapitation. Personal kind of

0:32:22.110 --> 0:32:25.990
<v S4>Mary guide to How to Lose Your Head. But it's

0:32:25.990 --> 0:32:28.550
<v S4>a good question. You know, I don't think the family

0:32:28.550 --> 0:32:31.510
<v S4>thought the riddle was all that funny. Sure, sure. They

0:32:31.510 --> 0:32:35.910
<v S4>wanted their their father husband. They wanted him back. They

0:32:35.910 --> 0:32:39.550
<v S4>wanted him out of the tower. But he was famous

0:32:39.550 --> 0:32:42.870
<v S4>for his humor. Scott. Um, he's described like a laughing

0:32:42.910 --> 0:32:47.350
<v S4>philosopher early in his life. The Merry More. This is

0:32:47.350 --> 0:32:51.070
<v S4>the man who jested on the way to decapitation, famously.

0:32:51.790 --> 0:32:53.590
<v S4>But I think the important thing to see here is

0:32:53.590 --> 0:32:56.790
<v S4>that the humor is not frivolous. It's not just like,

0:32:56.830 --> 0:32:58.990
<v S4>you know, we're just not reaching that guy. Like, you know,

0:32:59.430 --> 0:33:02.590
<v S4>he's just out of place. Humor. It was a deep

0:33:02.630 --> 0:33:08.390
<v S4>sense of humor at human things, at earthly things, a mirthfulness,

0:33:08.430 --> 0:33:11.430
<v S4>a merriment. And what you find if you study the

0:33:11.470 --> 0:33:15.830
<v S4>especially the tower writings, is that his good humor was

0:33:15.830 --> 0:33:19.430
<v S4>an expression of his hope. Mhm. Uh, his hope in God,

0:33:19.430 --> 0:33:23.950
<v S4>his perspective on eternity and on human life. And yes,

0:33:23.950 --> 0:33:26.670
<v S4>he did love laughing at the ridiculous, as so many

0:33:26.670 --> 0:33:29.150
<v S4>of us do. He had a keen eye for it.

0:33:29.350 --> 0:33:32.630
<v S4>But his last wish at trial, even to those who

0:33:32.670 --> 0:33:34.910
<v S4>who condemned him, was that they would all make merry

0:33:34.910 --> 0:33:39.870
<v S4>together in heaven. So he sees eternity as a place

0:33:39.870 --> 0:33:42.550
<v S4>of laughter and good humor as well.

0:33:42.950 --> 0:33:46.590
<v S3>Is there a particular letter inside the last riddle where

0:33:46.590 --> 0:33:50.910
<v S3>we might encounter, or you think we encounter the real

0:33:50.950 --> 0:33:52.750
<v S3>Thomas More most vividly?

0:33:53.470 --> 0:33:56.590
<v S4>Yeah. I think that, um, there are about three different

0:33:56.590 --> 0:34:02.030
<v S4>answers to that question. Um, the interrogation letters, you really

0:34:02.070 --> 0:34:06.510
<v S4>see Moore's poise and command and peace of soul under

0:34:06.510 --> 0:34:12.070
<v S4>tremendous pressure. That's a very hard to do in real time.

0:34:12.550 --> 0:34:16.670
<v S4>And those interrogation letters show us the high stakes life

0:34:16.670 --> 0:34:22.840
<v S4>and death interrogation of Thomas Moore. But obviously the letters

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:26.560
<v S4>to his daughter, I think, are where that, uh, fatherhood

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:30.960
<v S4>comes out and the friendship, uh, very beautifully. His relationship

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:35.600
<v S4>with his daughter was famous. Um, Erasmus, you know, was,

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:39.120
<v S4>was very familiar with it, for example. And Moore took

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:44.680
<v S4>great pains educating his daughters. So the more Meg relationship

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:46.799
<v S4>is at the heart of the book. And maybe the

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:49.920
<v S4>last one I would single out is the letter to

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:53.560
<v S4>Anthony Bonvisi, um, which he wrote a month before his

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:57.440
<v S4>trial and death. And it is a tribute to friendship

0:34:57.480 --> 0:35:02.520
<v S4>across an entire lifetime, I will confess, is probably my

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:05.840
<v S4>favorite letter, along with his last letter to Meg, um,

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:09.440
<v S4>which was written the day before his death. So the

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:13.120
<v S4>interrogation letters, the letters to Meg, and then the letter

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:17.480
<v S4>to this man of mystery, Anthony Bonvisi, his lifelong friend,

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:20.839
<v S4>celebrating the Goodness. The beauty of friendship.

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:24.239
<v S3>Doctor Stephen Smith with us. He is the Dean of Humanities,

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:27.440
<v S3>temple family chair of English Lit here at Hillsdale College.

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:30.040
<v S3>His new book is The Last Riddle on the letters

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:34.160
<v S3>from Saint Thomas More. The letters include these ones to

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:36.760
<v S3>his daughter you mentioned earlier it's a family story, too.

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:40.480
<v S3>They're very famous. In one of these letters, he cautions

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:45.520
<v S3>his daughter not to let natural affection override conscience. How

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:51.239
<v S3>does Moore himself balance love for his family with loyalty

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:54.640
<v S3>to what he believes is right? Is he could have

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:56.880
<v S3>he could avoid all this by taking the oath, right?

0:35:57.320 --> 0:35:57.680
<v S4>He sure.

0:35:57.719 --> 0:35:59.520
<v S3>Could. He sure could. So how does he how does

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:00.440
<v S3>he balance that?

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:03.680
<v S4>Yeah. I mean, that door, he he could have unlocked

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:07.279
<v S4>it from the inside and walked right out that door. Um,

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:14.400
<v S4>I think he sees his stand of conscience and his, um,

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:18.640
<v S4>stand of truth as being the best way he can

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:22.759
<v S4>love his family, even though it may have maybe a

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:27.160
<v S4>tough form of love. His wife really wanted him to

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:29.440
<v S4>come out of the tower to come to his senses.

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:35.400
<v S4>His daughter wanted him not to get himself executed. So

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:42.000
<v S4>it's it's a really painful in part story. And yet

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:44.959
<v S4>at the heart of it is this great kind of

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:48.920
<v S4>man of with great piece of soul fidelity to conscience

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:53.359
<v S4>and truth. What I would say is his consistency and

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:58.200
<v S4>his stand was the best way he could actually love them. Um,

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:00.400
<v S4>as difficult as it was for some of them to

0:37:00.400 --> 0:37:01.640
<v S4>understand at the time.

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:05.600
<v S3>One of the recurring themes through the letters is that

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:11.160
<v S3>suffering can actually become spiritually meaningful. How does Moore try

0:37:11.160 --> 0:37:13.840
<v S3>to teach that lesson to his daughter, Meg?

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:18.400
<v S4>Well, Moore had a lifelong devotion to the passion of

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:24.000
<v S4>the of the Christ. And. And so he understood his

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:26.920
<v S4>own suffering in the light of the cross. And he.

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:30.960
<v S4>And he tried to share that not only with Meg,

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:34.520
<v S4>but also with all of his friends outside of the tower.

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:38.239
<v S4>And he had many. If readers are interested in the

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:42.400
<v S4>full view of Thomas More on Suffering, the two other

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:44.759
<v S4>works he wrote in the tower are the Dialogue of

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:49.000
<v S4>Comfort against tribulation and the Sadness of Christ. And both

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:52.600
<v S4>of these, among other things, are a profound meditation on

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:58.520
<v S4>human suffering on the cross and on the goodness of

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:03.600
<v S4>of it ultimately. So, yes, more, more suffered. But he

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:06.839
<v S4>put his suffering to good service, to the service of

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:11.000
<v S4>his family, of his friends, of his God, of his country.

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:14.840
<v S3>Doctor Stephen Smith, with his book The Last Riddle Advice

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:18.930
<v S3>on Living and dying well from the imprisoned Saint Thomas More.

0:38:19.489 --> 0:38:24.049
<v S3>These letters in the last riddle reveal any moments of doubt,

0:38:24.250 --> 0:38:28.890
<v S3>fear or uncertainty. Uh, was more the real deal. Was he.

0:38:28.930 --> 0:38:32.090
<v S3>Is he as steadfast as. Perhaps we. We imagine he was.

0:38:33.210 --> 0:38:37.810
<v S4>Well, he had spent his entire life practicing the virtues

0:38:37.810 --> 0:38:43.010
<v S4>that are exhibited in these letters, cultivating them, struggling. An

0:38:43.010 --> 0:38:47.770
<v S4>ordinary human being, sharing human nature with all of us.

0:38:48.450 --> 0:38:52.130
<v S4>But his was a lifelong project. You know, he didn't

0:38:52.130 --> 0:38:56.450
<v S4>just appear in the Tower of London in April 1534,

0:38:57.250 --> 0:39:00.570
<v S4>you know, ready to roll. He he had been living

0:39:00.570 --> 0:39:07.609
<v S4>a particular way deliberately, courageously, day by day for an

0:39:07.610 --> 0:39:12.489
<v S4>entire lifetime. When he came to the Tower of London.

0:39:12.730 --> 0:39:14.810
<v S4>So part of the story of Maud, it's important to

0:39:14.810 --> 0:39:22.250
<v S4>really understand is that is that lifelong, um, preparation and, um,

0:39:22.610 --> 0:39:25.410
<v S4>even over the oath, you know, he didn't just sort

0:39:25.410 --> 0:39:26.890
<v S4>of say, you know, one day I don't, I'm not

0:39:26.890 --> 0:39:29.850
<v S4>going to take the oath. It, it was the fruit

0:39:29.850 --> 0:39:35.890
<v S4>of much study, much deliberation, making himself sure. Uh, and then,

0:39:36.210 --> 0:39:39.569
<v S4>you know, taking that, that stand of conscience and not

0:39:39.570 --> 0:39:42.529
<v S4>budging from it. I mean, his peace of soul and

0:39:42.530 --> 0:39:46.770
<v S4>his consistency are quite striking in these letters.

0:39:47.170 --> 0:39:51.330
<v S3>Throughout the letters, friendship, friendship seems almost as important as

0:39:51.330 --> 0:39:56.290
<v S3>politics or theology. Why was friendship so central to More's

0:39:56.330 --> 0:39:58.890
<v S3>understanding of living a good life?

0:39:59.170 --> 0:40:04.370
<v S4>Well, more, uh, was famous for being a friend, and

0:40:04.370 --> 0:40:08.490
<v S4>he enjoyed the largest number of friendships of. Well, among

0:40:08.489 --> 0:40:11.370
<v S4>many of the great folks I've studied. It's an incredibly

0:40:11.370 --> 0:40:14.490
<v S4>rich life of friendship, right down to that last letter

0:40:14.489 --> 0:40:18.689
<v S4>I mentioned. Second to last letter in the Tower of London. Erasmus,

0:40:18.690 --> 0:40:21.290
<v S4>his moor's lifelong friend, said that if you were looking

0:40:21.290 --> 0:40:24.050
<v S4>for a great example of true friendship, you can find

0:40:24.050 --> 0:40:27.730
<v S4>it to no better purpose than in Thomas More. He

0:40:28.010 --> 0:40:34.170
<v S4>loved friendship, Scott. He wrote poems on friendship. Friendship unites

0:40:34.210 --> 0:40:37.330
<v S4>his writings from from beginning to end of his life.

0:40:38.010 --> 0:40:42.090
<v S4>And so I think that he joins Cicero and Aristotle

0:40:42.290 --> 0:40:48.650
<v S4>and Aquinas and Scripture in seeing the greatness of friendship

0:40:48.930 --> 0:40:53.410
<v S4>and the need that we have for it. Also, ultimately

0:40:53.690 --> 0:40:58.170
<v S4>understanding his relationship with God in terms of friendship as well.

0:40:58.489 --> 0:41:02.450
<v S3>Moore spends a good deal of time thinking and writing

0:41:02.450 --> 0:41:04.850
<v S3>about the thing you might think he'd be thinking and

0:41:04.850 --> 0:41:09.450
<v S3>writing about, which is his death. What does he believe

0:41:09.450 --> 0:41:14.610
<v S3>through these writings? A person should focus on one confronting mortality.

0:41:14.969 --> 0:41:18.650
<v S4>Well, certainly it should be taken seriously, and human life

0:41:18.690 --> 0:41:23.490
<v S4>should be seen with a reliable, true perspective in its entirety.

0:41:24.130 --> 0:41:27.770
<v S4>And human beings, we tend to see things differently. We

0:41:27.770 --> 0:41:29.650
<v S4>tend to put things out and push things out of view.

0:41:29.930 --> 0:41:33.650
<v S4>So we need that, that full, real perspective. But I

0:41:33.650 --> 0:41:36.969
<v S4>think in the, in the here and now, it's that

0:41:36.969 --> 0:41:42.930
<v S4>focus on, um, living well now, uh, for the right reasons,

0:41:42.930 --> 0:41:46.970
<v S4>with good conscience, with peace of soul, with real desire,

0:41:46.969 --> 0:41:51.690
<v S4>with love, with faith. That is the best preparation. There's

0:41:51.690 --> 0:41:54.529
<v S4>a prayer, Scott, that he wrote right toward the end.

0:41:55.090 --> 0:41:58.650
<v S4>And it's within days of his death. And he and

0:41:58.650 --> 0:42:02.490
<v S4>he concludes, the things that I pray for in this prayer, Lord,

0:42:02.489 --> 0:42:06.009
<v S4>give me the grace to labor for. So even at

0:42:06.010 --> 0:42:09.370
<v S4>the very end, with just hours to live, days to live,

0:42:09.850 --> 0:42:15.529
<v S4>he Still had this present business, this present work to

0:42:15.570 --> 0:42:20.089
<v S4>perform with God's grace, with God's help. And he put

0:42:20.090 --> 0:42:24.170
<v S4>himself into that. And I think that was the, um,

0:42:24.290 --> 0:42:27.930
<v S4>that living well, the best preparation. And one, one of

0:42:27.930 --> 0:42:30.770
<v S4>the reasons for the subtitle of the book, Advice on

0:42:30.770 --> 0:42:34.090
<v S4>Living and Dying well, is that when you read more,

0:42:34.930 --> 0:42:38.170
<v S4>you discover in these letters and the prayers that they

0:42:38.210 --> 0:42:42.770
<v S4>are just as much about living as they are about dying.

0:42:42.850 --> 0:42:43.370
<v S3>Mhm.

0:42:43.730 --> 0:42:45.930
<v S4>You know, we often tend to think, go right to

0:42:45.969 --> 0:42:50.850
<v S4>the death part or to the dramatic decapitation. Um, but

0:42:51.170 --> 0:42:56.810
<v S4>more returns our focus regularly, consistently to living well.

0:42:56.850 --> 0:42:59.410
<v S3>Now I have to ask one other question about the

0:42:59.570 --> 0:43:01.969
<v S3>the death. I think it's in your introduction that you

0:43:01.969 --> 0:43:07.650
<v S3>explain after his decapitation, his daughter Meg retrieves his head

0:43:07.650 --> 0:43:10.780
<v S3>after decapitation. I got to ask about was that normal practice?

0:43:10.820 --> 0:43:13.700
<v S3>Was that unusual? What was the meaning? Why did you

0:43:13.739 --> 0:43:14.340
<v S3>do it?

0:43:14.780 --> 0:43:19.060
<v S4>Well, the heads of traders were not exactly treated gently.

0:43:19.460 --> 0:43:22.339
<v S4>They were displayed as a warning. And then, you know,

0:43:22.380 --> 0:43:24.819
<v S4>Saint John Fisher's head was just tossed into the river

0:43:24.860 --> 0:43:31.380
<v S4>unceremoniously after this. So Meg, um, courageously found a way

0:43:31.380 --> 0:43:35.500
<v S4>to retrieve the head. And that's why, to this day,

0:43:35.940 --> 0:43:40.020
<v S4>you may visit Thomas Moore's head. It was eventually arrived

0:43:40.020 --> 0:43:44.660
<v S4>in Canterbury at Saint Dunstan's and is buried there deep

0:43:44.660 --> 0:43:49.180
<v S4>in the floor. So it was Meg Roper, his daughter Margaret,

0:43:49.460 --> 0:43:53.580
<v S4>who retrieved the head and also played a vital role

0:43:53.580 --> 0:43:57.260
<v S4>in these letters, surviving and in Moore's writings, eventually coming

0:43:57.260 --> 0:44:01.220
<v S4>to print afterwards as well. I think that the Meg

0:44:01.219 --> 0:44:05.300
<v S4>Roper story, that the other detail from her life that's

0:44:05.300 --> 0:44:08.779
<v S4>worth remembering. You may have seen it in pictures or

0:44:08.860 --> 0:44:13.620
<v S4>in art is that after her father was condemned at trial,

0:44:14.260 --> 0:44:18.060
<v S4>she pushed her way through the guards and embraced him.

0:44:18.060 --> 0:44:22.020
<v S4>It's a very famous scene. And then. And then she

0:44:22.020 --> 0:44:26.339
<v S4>did it again. And with One Day to Live, when

0:44:26.380 --> 0:44:29.780
<v S4>Moore writes his very last letter to her, he singles

0:44:29.780 --> 0:44:32.219
<v S4>that out and he tells her, I never liked your

0:44:32.219 --> 0:44:36.020
<v S4>manner better than when we parted last. You know, he

0:44:36.020 --> 0:44:38.700
<v S4>ends with this beautiful like he said that, you know,

0:44:38.739 --> 0:44:42.180
<v S4>that was virtue. And then he thanks her for everything

0:44:42.180 --> 0:44:45.140
<v S4>she did for him while in the tower. So the

0:44:45.180 --> 0:44:48.620
<v S4>more Meg relationship is really at the heart of the

0:44:48.620 --> 0:44:49.420
<v S4>book as well.

0:44:49.820 --> 0:44:52.540
<v S3>Doctor Stephen Smith with his book The Last Riddle on

0:44:52.540 --> 0:44:55.900
<v S3>the writings of Saint Thomas Moore from prison at the

0:44:55.900 --> 0:44:59.540
<v S3>very end, there's this section of prayers, and you say

0:44:59.540 --> 0:45:02.820
<v S3>that this can be read as another kind of correspondence,

0:45:02.820 --> 0:45:05.660
<v S3>a correspondence with God. What do we learn about Moore

0:45:05.660 --> 0:45:07.380
<v S3>from the way he speaks to God?

0:45:07.700 --> 0:45:09.540
<v S4>Yeah, I do. I do think that, you know, we

0:45:09.540 --> 0:45:17.380
<v S4>have letters to family and friends. We have letters, um, also, um,

0:45:17.980 --> 0:45:22.540
<v S4>in his lifetime to, to really just about everyone. But

0:45:22.540 --> 0:45:28.020
<v S4>these last prayers are the same man's, you know, if

0:45:28.020 --> 0:45:31.100
<v S4>you will, letters to, to God. And I think what,

0:45:31.100 --> 0:45:34.980
<v S4>what we see there is the vitality of his relationship

0:45:35.340 --> 0:45:40.739
<v S4>to God. We see his habit of prayer and his

0:45:40.739 --> 0:45:43.500
<v S4>habit of approaching God as what he called a tender,

0:45:43.500 --> 0:45:46.500
<v S4>loving father early in his life. That's another thing he

0:45:46.500 --> 0:45:49.460
<v S4>never really moved from as a as a man and

0:45:49.460 --> 0:45:52.900
<v S4>as a writer. Early on, he describes God as a tender,

0:45:52.900 --> 0:45:57.140
<v S4>loving father. And these prayers at the end, uh, really

0:45:57.140 --> 0:46:02.580
<v S4>bespeak that, you know, filial sense of, uh, of humanity

0:46:02.900 --> 0:46:06.020
<v S4>and how we stand before God. One last thing I

0:46:06.020 --> 0:46:09.580
<v S4>might add is one of the coolest things that I've

0:46:09.580 --> 0:46:15.940
<v S4>ever experienced in my life involved going to Yale's Beinecke

0:46:15.940 --> 0:46:19.380
<v S4>Library and holding the Prayer Book of Saint Thomas More

0:46:19.380 --> 0:46:23.500
<v S4>in my own hands. We had Jerry Wegener and I

0:46:23.540 --> 0:46:26.420
<v S4>put out the essential works of Thomas Moore with Yale

0:46:26.420 --> 0:46:30.740
<v S4>in 2020, and I was able to visit Beinecke and

0:46:30.739 --> 0:46:34.020
<v S4>see a bunch of their great Moore Holdings as part

0:46:34.020 --> 0:46:37.380
<v S4>of that project. And the Prayer Book is famous because

0:46:37.380 --> 0:46:40.460
<v S4>it has not only, um, a bunch of prayers in it,

0:46:40.460 --> 0:46:43.899
<v S4>but it has Moore's handwritten on one of his great

0:46:43.900 --> 0:46:46.660
<v S4>handwritten prayers in the margins and on top of the page.

0:46:46.700 --> 0:46:49.259
<v S4>Bottom of page. Top of page. Bottom of page. And

0:46:49.260 --> 0:46:51.859
<v S4>even though I have stood in the tower cell of

0:46:51.900 --> 0:46:56.620
<v S4>Saint Thomas Moore in London, I never felt closer to

0:46:56.660 --> 0:46:59.299
<v S4>him than when I held that prayer book in my hands.

0:46:59.780 --> 0:47:06.830
<v S4>So the prayers are a beautiful and eloquent and unforgettable.

0:47:07.590 --> 0:47:10.470
<v S3>Doctor Stephen Smith. We mentioned earlier that there is this

0:47:10.469 --> 0:47:14.989
<v S3>eight part free video series over at Thomas more studies.org

0:47:15.469 --> 0:47:17.990
<v S3>that you were involved with creating. What can people find there?

0:47:18.670 --> 0:47:22.150
<v S4>Well, if you want to find out how much more

0:47:22.190 --> 0:47:27.230
<v S4>there is to know about Thomas More, the video class

0:47:27.230 --> 0:47:30.750
<v S4>begins at the beginning of his life and follows his

0:47:30.750 --> 0:47:34.029
<v S4>footsteps from there all the way to the tower, and

0:47:34.030 --> 0:47:37.510
<v S4>it focuses on his major writings and the major turning

0:47:37.510 --> 0:47:41.509
<v S4>points of his life. It's meant to be an introduction

0:47:41.510 --> 0:47:45.150
<v S4>to this, this great author, this great man, this great saint,

0:47:45.469 --> 0:47:48.989
<v S4>and to show how much more there really is to

0:47:49.030 --> 0:47:51.989
<v S4>Thomas more than most of us realize.

0:47:52.390 --> 0:47:57.509
<v S3>Thomas. More studies.org for the video series. The book is available.

0:47:57.550 --> 0:48:00.910
<v S3>The Last Riddle Advice on Living and Dying well from

0:48:00.910 --> 0:48:05.070
<v S3>the imprisoned Saint Thomas More. Doctor Stephen Smith, your author,

0:48:05.070 --> 0:48:07.990
<v S3>temple family chair of English literature here at Hillsdale College

0:48:07.989 --> 0:48:10.910
<v S3>and also Dean of Humanities. Doctor Smith, thanks so much

0:48:10.910 --> 0:48:13.950
<v S3>for joining us here on the Radio Free Hillsdale Hour.

0:48:14.110 --> 0:48:15.590
<v S4>Thank you for the invitation, Scott.

0:48:16.070 --> 0:48:19.070
<v S3>That will wrap up this edition of the Radio Free

0:48:19.110 --> 0:48:22.430
<v S3>Hillsdale Hour. Our thanks to God, sod and Doctor Stephen

0:48:22.430 --> 0:48:26.230
<v S3>Smith from Hillsdale College. Remember, you can hear new episodes

0:48:26.230 --> 0:48:29.350
<v S3>every week on this station. You also can find extended

0:48:29.350 --> 0:48:32.029
<v S3>versions of some of our interviews, or listen any time

0:48:32.030 --> 0:48:39.029
<v S3>to the podcast. Find it@podcast.hillsdale.edu or wherever you get your audio.

0:48:39.390 --> 0:48:43.350
<v S3>Until next week, I'm Scott Bertram, and this has been

0:48:43.670 --> 0:48:46.190
<v S3>the radio free Hillsdale Hour.