WEBVTT - A Conversation with Jason Meller of Kolide/1Password

0:00:21.623 --> 0:00:25.433
<v S1>In this standalone episode, I speak with Jason Miller. Jason

0:00:25.433 --> 0:00:29.893
<v S1>is the founder of collide. A company recently acquired by

0:00:29.893 --> 0:00:34.423
<v S1>One Password. And in this conversation we discuss collides acquisition

0:00:34.423 --> 0:00:38.713
<v S1>by one password. The synergy between collide and One Password.

0:00:39.703 --> 0:00:43.483
<v S1>The challenge of password management. The concept of device trust

0:00:43.483 --> 0:00:48.853
<v S1>and zero trust. The limitations of current MDM solutions. Engaging

0:00:48.853 --> 0:00:53.743
<v S1>end users and security remediation. The philosophy behind collides approach.

0:00:54.073 --> 0:00:58.123
<v S1>The importance of human friendly security solutions. Future plans for

0:00:58.123 --> 0:01:03.103
<v S1>collide and the potential for broader application of collides technology.

0:01:03.463 --> 0:01:11.253
<v S1>And with that, here's our conversation with Jason Miller. All right, Jason,

0:01:11.253 --> 0:01:12.903
<v S1>welcome to unsupervised Learning.

0:01:14.103 --> 0:01:15.153
<v S2>Thanks for having me.

0:01:16.473 --> 0:01:19.203
<v S1>Yeah. So I understand you've had some big news in

0:01:19.203 --> 0:01:20.253
<v S1>recent weeks.

0:01:21.903 --> 0:01:26.043
<v S2>Yeah. Yeah, it's been a whirlwind. Uh, as I think

0:01:26.193 --> 0:01:28.983
<v S2>some some folks have found out, we've been acquired by

0:01:28.983 --> 0:01:31.743
<v S2>one password. We announced that a few weeks ago at

0:01:31.743 --> 0:01:34.683
<v S2>the time of this recording, and, um, it was a

0:01:34.683 --> 0:01:36.873
<v S2>really big deal. Uh, it's something that we've been working

0:01:36.873 --> 0:01:39.453
<v S2>on with them for a while and discussions, and it

0:01:39.453 --> 0:01:42.903
<v S2>was awesome to finally be able to talk about it publicly.

0:01:42.903 --> 0:01:48.183
<v S2>But I've always loved the one password product. I got

0:01:48.183 --> 0:01:50.883
<v S2>to meet a lot of the folks who lead the

0:01:50.883 --> 0:01:56.403
<v S2>company there, including the original founders. And, uh, they're incredible.

0:01:56.403 --> 0:01:58.743
<v S2>They're just as good as the product that they sell.

0:01:59.013 --> 0:02:01.053
<v S2>And that was really important to me, because some of

0:02:01.053 --> 0:02:05.883
<v S2>the foundational elements of collide was around treating end users

0:02:05.883 --> 0:02:09.963
<v S2>with respect, honesty, getting in front of end users and

0:02:09.963 --> 0:02:14.393
<v S2>giving them. Under an understanding of what's wrong with their device.

0:02:14.393 --> 0:02:16.673
<v S2>Will they do the same thing? But they focused on

0:02:16.673 --> 0:02:20.843
<v S2>probably even the harder problem than we solve is what

0:02:20.843 --> 0:02:22.763
<v S2>do you do about passwords? How do you keep yourself

0:02:22.763 --> 0:02:26.243
<v S2>safe with all these different logins to all these different apps?

0:02:26.513 --> 0:02:29.063
<v S2>They've solved that so well that it's been ubiquitous like

0:02:29.063 --> 0:02:31.733
<v S2>everybody uses it. And that was always a goal for

0:02:31.733 --> 0:02:34.283
<v S2>me at Callide is to achieve the same thing. But

0:02:34.283 --> 0:02:36.533
<v S2>on the in the device trust space and for end

0:02:36.533 --> 0:02:40.013
<v S2>user driven remediation. And so for us, like culturally the

0:02:40.013 --> 0:02:44.513
<v S2>fit was perfect. And it's great for me because we

0:02:44.513 --> 0:02:47.873
<v S2>get a lot of opportunity to still grow and what

0:02:47.873 --> 0:02:49.523
<v S2>we're doing at Callide. But now we have a lot

0:02:49.523 --> 0:02:52.073
<v S2>more resources, and that would have had to have come

0:02:52.073 --> 0:02:54.983
<v S2>through the form of venture capital and a number of

0:02:54.983 --> 0:02:58.703
<v S2>other things, and the incentives can sometimes get misaligned. Really

0:02:58.703 --> 0:03:01.373
<v S2>confident that with one password, we're going to be able

0:03:01.373 --> 0:03:04.523
<v S2>to continue our mission, achieve it at a much faster

0:03:04.523 --> 0:03:08.603
<v S2>pace and keep what was core about us, our DNA,

0:03:08.603 --> 0:03:10.523
<v S2>the same because they're that way too.

0:03:11.213 --> 0:03:13.943
<v S1>Yeah. That's great. So so talk about some of that synergy.

0:03:13.943 --> 0:03:17.513
<v S1>Like how did this, uh what do you think they

0:03:17.513 --> 0:03:20.453
<v S1>saw in you? Obviously we think it's a great product,

0:03:20.453 --> 0:03:23.183
<v S1>but like the different spaces, a lot of people might

0:03:23.183 --> 0:03:25.883
<v S1>be like, wait a minute, which space is one password?

0:03:25.883 --> 0:03:28.643
<v S1>Which space is Callide? How do you how do you

0:03:28.643 --> 0:03:31.373
<v S1>see that merging both when you first heard about it

0:03:31.373 --> 0:03:34.313
<v S1>and then also now like as you actually implement it?

0:03:35.513 --> 0:03:38.783
<v S2>Yeah. I think to understand why one password likes collide.

0:03:38.783 --> 0:03:43.703
<v S2>It's not about necessarily product or feature synergy. We're in

0:03:43.703 --> 0:03:46.973
<v S2>different areas. And the thing that makes sense to them

0:03:46.973 --> 0:03:49.343
<v S2>is like the way that one password sees themselves after

0:03:49.343 --> 0:03:53.303
<v S2>talking with them, they really see themselves as a company

0:03:53.303 --> 0:03:56.843
<v S2>that is distilling down a really hard topic to, you know,

0:03:56.843 --> 0:03:59.123
<v S2>a hard problem to solve. And in their case, that's

0:03:59.243 --> 0:04:04.853
<v S2>password management and making it something that is easily solved

0:04:04.853 --> 0:04:08.453
<v S2>through software and technology, and distilling it down to a

0:04:08.453 --> 0:04:13.823
<v S2>level of simplicity that even my mom could figure out, right?

0:04:13.853 --> 0:04:18.083
<v S2>I mean, before there were password managers, there really weren't.

0:04:18.383 --> 0:04:20.453
<v S2>There was a lot of recommendations on what you're supposed

0:04:20.453 --> 0:04:23.393
<v S2>to do to do a good job, to keep yourself safe.

0:04:23.393 --> 0:04:25.883
<v S2>From a password perspective, you're not supposed to reuse passwords.

0:04:25.883 --> 0:04:28.313
<v S2>You need to have a certain level of complexity. So

0:04:28.313 --> 0:04:30.623
<v S2>we're doing a lot of talking as security practitioners and

0:04:30.623 --> 0:04:34.643
<v S2>telling people what they need to be doing. But we

0:04:34.643 --> 0:04:37.673
<v S2>weren't giving them any tools to really effectively put those

0:04:37.673 --> 0:04:40.553
<v S2>things into practice. And that's what one password was able

0:04:40.553 --> 0:04:43.253
<v S2>to do. On the Callide side, we have a very

0:04:43.253 --> 0:04:45.383
<v S2>similar challenge in front of us. We have a lot

0:04:45.383 --> 0:04:47.993
<v S2>of IT and security practitioners to tell end users all

0:04:47.993 --> 0:04:50.783
<v S2>the time, hey, you got to keep your OS up

0:04:50.783 --> 0:04:53.843
<v S2>to date. You need to have disk encryption enabled. You

0:04:53.843 --> 0:04:57.443
<v S2>need to have system integrity protection on the browsers need

0:04:57.443 --> 0:04:58.763
<v S2>to be up to date. You need to do this.

0:04:58.763 --> 0:05:01.673
<v S2>You need to do that. And today the tools that

0:05:01.673 --> 0:05:05.693
<v S2>we have to help users solve those problems don't work

0:05:05.693 --> 0:05:10.223
<v S2>very well. We have MDM. Most of Clyde's customers use MDM,

0:05:10.553 --> 0:05:12.713
<v S2>but it has a flaw. And that flaw is it

0:05:12.713 --> 0:05:17.003
<v S2>only can work on the devices that it's installed on.

0:05:17.243 --> 0:05:21.353
<v S2>And there's nothing that really stops people from signing into

0:05:21.353 --> 0:05:27.143
<v S2>your most important apps with their personal devices. Right? You

0:05:27.143 --> 0:05:30.263
<v S2>need to have something in place that says, hey, these

0:05:30.263 --> 0:05:32.723
<v S2>are the rules of the road. You're going to either

0:05:32.723 --> 0:05:36.383
<v S2>have a device that's managed under MDM or in addition

0:05:36.383 --> 0:05:39.473
<v S2>to that, or alternatively, you're going to meet these basic

0:05:39.473 --> 0:05:43.583
<v S2>security requirements before you can get on AWS, before you

0:05:43.583 --> 0:05:46.913
<v S2>can get on GitHub, before you can get on Salesforce, like,

0:05:46.913 --> 0:05:49.373
<v S2>these are the core apps that we have that sensitive

0:05:49.373 --> 0:05:51.743
<v S2>data in them. You need to be on a computer

0:05:51.743 --> 0:05:55.103
<v S2>that's safe. Well, there's no real good answer to that.

0:05:55.103 --> 0:05:59.933
<v S2>And Callide has found the beginnings of that solution for

0:05:59.933 --> 0:06:04.433
<v S2>folks who have Okta. And our plan is to make

0:06:04.433 --> 0:06:07.793
<v S2>that as ubiquitous as the one password password manager is

0:06:07.793 --> 0:06:10.793
<v S2>for passwords. We want to be that solution for solving

0:06:10.793 --> 0:06:12.563
<v S2>that problem for devices.

0:06:13.223 --> 0:06:15.413
<v S1>Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. I heard someone

0:06:15.413 --> 0:06:18.923
<v S1>describe business strategy in an interesting way before they said,

0:06:18.923 --> 0:06:22.883
<v S1>look for a really acute problem that's just so annoying

0:06:22.883 --> 0:06:26.813
<v S1>for people, and just solve it more elegantly and better

0:06:26.813 --> 0:06:30.503
<v S1>than anyone else. And both of the two problems that

0:06:30.503 --> 0:06:32.813
<v S1>that you described, they very much fit that.

0:06:33.813 --> 0:06:36.483
<v S2>That's exactly right. And that's why I think one pastor

0:06:36.483 --> 0:06:39.963
<v S2>has enjoyed so much success is sound like they have some.

0:06:40.263 --> 0:06:42.993
<v S2>They have a really great people there. But let's be clear,

0:06:42.993 --> 0:06:45.633
<v S2>the reason why they're so successful is they've built an

0:06:45.633 --> 0:06:48.933
<v S2>incredible product that solves a real problem that people have.

0:06:49.703 --> 0:06:54.083
<v S2>That's hard to do in the security space because first,

0:06:54.083 --> 0:06:56.723
<v S2>it's really hard to get people to even recognize there

0:06:56.723 --> 0:06:59.423
<v S2>is a problem. So like in colliders case, the thing

0:06:59.423 --> 0:07:01.613
<v S2>that we battle all the time, and one of the

0:07:01.613 --> 0:07:04.073
<v S2>reasons I even come on podcast to talk about it

0:07:04.583 --> 0:07:10.013
<v S2>is people don't necessarily recognize that it's bad that any

0:07:10.013 --> 0:07:14.873
<v S2>device can sign in to most of your apps, including

0:07:14.873 --> 0:07:19.583
<v S2>the devices that are not under management. And that's universally

0:07:19.583 --> 0:07:22.673
<v S2>true in a lot of organizations today. Device trust and

0:07:22.673 --> 0:07:25.913
<v S2>zero trust is concepts are new. Yeah, only a few

0:07:25.913 --> 0:07:28.583
<v S2>years old and the concepts are older. But the products

0:07:28.583 --> 0:07:31.703
<v S2>that actually create the outcomes people are looking for a

0:07:31.703 --> 0:07:34.973
<v S2>really new. And so most organizations are in a state

0:07:34.973 --> 0:07:37.763
<v S2>right now where yes, they have MDM, they have all

0:07:37.763 --> 0:07:43.353
<v S2>these things, but they're not actually. They haven't created a

0:07:43.353 --> 0:07:47.523
<v S2>protective layer that actually ensures that devices are in a

0:07:47.523 --> 0:07:52.593
<v S2>basic state. So a basic state of security. So fundamentally

0:07:52.593 --> 0:07:57.813
<v S2>we collide. Uh, we're solving that problem, and we're trying

0:07:57.813 --> 0:08:00.153
<v S2>to solve it in the most elegant way possible. That

0:08:00.153 --> 0:08:03.783
<v S2>still preserves the cultures of these companies, like a lot

0:08:03.783 --> 0:08:08.613
<v S2>of companies allow a pretty broad BYoD program, or they

0:08:08.613 --> 0:08:14.163
<v S2>have contractors that don't use company provision devices, and they

0:08:14.163 --> 0:08:17.793
<v S2>want to preserve that cultural element of their company, but

0:08:17.793 --> 0:08:21.123
<v S2>they want to have some semblance of security. Well, what

0:08:21.123 --> 0:08:23.613
<v S2>is the state of the what can you purchase today

0:08:23.613 --> 0:08:26.853
<v S2>to ensure that happens? There really isn't a lot out there.

0:08:26.883 --> 0:08:29.223
<v S2>A lot of the zero trust device trust solutions that

0:08:29.223 --> 0:08:33.663
<v S2>exist on the market today. Implicitly assume that the way

0:08:33.663 --> 0:08:36.123
<v S2>that you're going to decide whether a device should be

0:08:36.123 --> 0:08:39.513
<v S2>signing in or not is whether it's enrolled on the MDM.

0:08:39.573 --> 0:08:43.023
<v S2>But if you have a big BYoD program, end users

0:08:43.023 --> 0:08:45.393
<v S2>aren't going to want to enroll their devices in the MDM,

0:08:45.393 --> 0:08:47.553
<v S2>or nor is it really appropriate for them to be

0:08:47.553 --> 0:08:51.333
<v S2>doing that in some cases. Or contractors, they may be

0:08:51.333 --> 0:08:54.453
<v S2>on their own MDM and they're not on yours. And

0:08:54.453 --> 0:08:56.403
<v S2>a lot of the solutions out there just don't work

0:08:56.403 --> 0:08:59.403
<v S2>in that world. We've sort of distilled it down beyond that.

0:08:59.403 --> 0:09:02.013
<v S2>The thing, the key insight that Callide has had is

0:09:02.493 --> 0:09:05.553
<v S2>you can't assume that a device is in a good

0:09:05.553 --> 0:09:08.793
<v S2>state just because it's on the MDM anyway. So let's

0:09:08.793 --> 0:09:11.913
<v S2>just start at first principles. Yeah. What is the disk

0:09:11.913 --> 0:09:15.633
<v S2>encryption story? What is the OS version? How long has

0:09:15.633 --> 0:09:18.753
<v S2>it been since the the device has been rebooted. So

0:09:18.753 --> 0:09:20.643
<v S2>on and so forth. And you can run hundreds of

0:09:20.643 --> 0:09:24.483
<v S2>different checks. Let's just look at those at a baseline level.

0:09:24.483 --> 0:09:27.693
<v S2>Not even thinking about the MDM. And and if they're

0:09:27.693 --> 0:09:29.973
<v S2>not in that state then they don't get on. But

0:09:29.973 --> 0:09:34.203
<v S2>more importantly, we can engage with the end user to

0:09:34.203 --> 0:09:38.163
<v S2>get them to fix those problems while they are being

0:09:38.163 --> 0:09:41.193
<v S2>informed that they're blocked from being signing in. And that's

0:09:41.193 --> 0:09:45.033
<v S2>the key. And that's why this type of solution is

0:09:45.033 --> 0:09:48.033
<v S2>so important, because it will work on anything. Like we

0:09:48.033 --> 0:09:51.483
<v S2>support Linux, you have mobile devices. The reason why we

0:09:51.483 --> 0:09:54.423
<v S2>can do that is we don't need a special API

0:09:54.423 --> 0:09:57.003
<v S2>to fix the problems. The interface to fix the problems

0:09:57.003 --> 0:09:59.583
<v S2>is the person sitting behind the computer. Yeah. And if

0:09:59.583 --> 0:10:02.523
<v S2>you embrace that and you make it so that they

0:10:02.523 --> 0:10:05.013
<v S2>understand and they have the motivation and the tools to

0:10:05.013 --> 0:10:07.893
<v S2>do it, they can solve any problem. Even the most

0:10:07.893 --> 0:10:12.543
<v S2>nuanced security issues your organization is trying to solve today

0:10:12.543 --> 0:10:15.483
<v S2>and users can fix for you and with perfect efficacy

0:10:15.483 --> 0:10:16.953
<v S2>if you do this the right way.

0:10:17.853 --> 0:10:18.573
<v S3>Yeah.

0:10:19.293 --> 0:10:22.323
<v S1>Yeah, that makes sense. It's actually interesting. I mean, that

0:10:22.323 --> 0:10:26.913
<v S1>zero trust story really, really does resonate because it's like

0:10:27.633 --> 0:10:30.513
<v S1>you're falling back and saying, look, this MDM thing, it

0:10:30.513 --> 0:10:33.303
<v S1>hasn't worked out that perfectly. And you're dealing with the

0:10:33.303 --> 0:10:37.563
<v S1>reality that is, which is the business hands out laptops

0:10:37.563 --> 0:10:41.133
<v S1>to people and says go to work like that just happens.

0:10:41.223 --> 0:10:44.193
<v S1>And then when security is like, well, you don't have

0:10:44.193 --> 0:10:47.343
<v S1>the MDM, we can't let you on. Like we're literally

0:10:47.343 --> 0:10:48.453
<v S1>stopping business.

0:10:49.483 --> 0:10:53.533
<v S2>Right? Yeah. And it's a concern. Well, what's interesting is that.

0:10:54.503 --> 0:10:56.873
<v S2>The companies don't really have good tools today to measure

0:10:56.873 --> 0:11:02.113
<v S2>how effective. Their device program. So let's say you don't

0:11:02.113 --> 0:11:06.223
<v S2>have a zero trust or device trust solution today. And

0:11:06.223 --> 0:11:09.193
<v S2>you're trying to understand is that even important? Well, the

0:11:09.193 --> 0:11:11.203
<v S2>first thing that you need to do is you need

0:11:11.203 --> 0:11:13.603
<v S2>to at least cast a net and understand who, what

0:11:13.603 --> 0:11:17.983
<v S2>devices are even signing into apps. Yeah. And that is

0:11:17.983 --> 0:11:20.113
<v S2>that there really isn't an answer to how to solve

0:11:20.113 --> 0:11:21.913
<v S2>that today. You know, that's one of the things I'm

0:11:21.913 --> 0:11:24.493
<v S2>working with on the one password side is can we

0:11:24.493 --> 0:11:28.873
<v S2>actually help capture that? But let's say that report did exist.

0:11:28.873 --> 0:11:31.153
<v S2>Let's say I could give you a report today for

0:11:31.153 --> 0:11:34.723
<v S2>your business. That said, here's all the devices that we saw.

0:11:34.723 --> 0:11:38.293
<v S2>Log in to this app and here's their state. Without

0:11:38.293 --> 0:11:40.183
<v S2>deploying an agent or anything like that, let's just say

0:11:40.183 --> 0:11:43.813
<v S2>that report exists. I think the challenge is that you're

0:11:43.813 --> 0:11:45.763
<v S2>going to see a lot of things. You're going to see, hey,

0:11:45.763 --> 0:11:47.593
<v S2>a lot of these some of these devices aren't on

0:11:47.593 --> 0:11:51.673
<v S2>any MDM. Some of these devices don't have any disk encryption.

0:11:51.673 --> 0:11:54.223
<v S2>Like they just file Vault is off if it's Mac

0:11:54.223 --> 0:11:58.543
<v S2>or BitLocker is off if it's windows. Here's a bunch

0:11:58.543 --> 0:12:03.463
<v S2>that have like an OS version that's three years old.

0:12:03.463 --> 0:12:07.663
<v S2>Four years old. Yeah. Probably exploitable remotely easily by any

0:12:07.663 --> 0:12:10.303
<v S2>drive by malware that could go to the wrong website

0:12:10.303 --> 0:12:13.573
<v S2>and you're popped. You would see a report that says that.

0:12:13.573 --> 0:12:18.013
<v S2>And then the key insight is, after seeing this report,

0:12:18.013 --> 0:12:20.863
<v S2>what do you want to reach for to solve that problem?

0:12:20.863 --> 0:12:23.803
<v S2>And I think what a lot of folks naturally reach

0:12:23.803 --> 0:12:27.523
<v S2>for is, oh, we need more MDM. Well, no, not

0:12:27.523 --> 0:12:31.633
<v S2>really either. You already have MDM and that's not clearly

0:12:31.633 --> 0:12:35.113
<v S2>not working. We've captured a bunch of devices here that

0:12:35.113 --> 0:12:36.943
<v S2>are being used to do real work that aren't on

0:12:36.943 --> 0:12:41.803
<v S2>the MDM. So now that's not working that program. And

0:12:41.803 --> 0:12:45.763
<v S2>the other thing is. You don't have any way of

0:12:45.763 --> 0:12:50.653
<v S2>even effectively measuring the security of these devices outside of

0:12:50.653 --> 0:12:53.143
<v S2>the MDM. So the right thing to reach for isn't

0:12:53.143 --> 0:12:57.523
<v S2>an MDM. In that case, it's to reach for device trust.

0:12:57.523 --> 0:13:01.273
<v S2>It's to say, hey, let's say I have Okta. Let's

0:13:01.273 --> 0:13:05.743
<v S2>figure out a way during the Okta authentication flow to

0:13:05.743 --> 0:13:08.293
<v S2>vet a device. Let's figure out what's going on with

0:13:08.293 --> 0:13:12.403
<v S2>it and then let's. Not let it in if it's

0:13:12.403 --> 0:13:15.613
<v S2>not in the right state, but not block work. As

0:13:15.613 --> 0:13:18.433
<v S2>you said, let's actually give that person who is being

0:13:18.433 --> 0:13:21.943
<v S2>blocked a path to redemption. How do they get their

0:13:21.943 --> 0:13:24.793
<v S2>device in the right state? And they'll be highly motivated

0:13:24.793 --> 0:13:26.533
<v S2>to do that because they want to go and get

0:13:26.533 --> 0:13:29.383
<v S2>to work. And then how do you get the nuances

0:13:29.383 --> 0:13:32.203
<v S2>of that interaction? Right? Like maybe it doesn't start off

0:13:32.203 --> 0:13:34.213
<v S2>with a block. It starts off with a warning and

0:13:34.213 --> 0:13:37.333
<v S2>you have 14 days. Or maybe it's not even a

0:13:37.333 --> 0:13:40.663
<v S2>warning with a consequences. It's just an FYI like, hey,

0:13:40.663 --> 0:13:43.483
<v S2>we're gonna, in the future, be rolling out this program.

0:13:43.483 --> 0:13:47.863
<v S2>If it were to have been implemented today, you probably

0:13:47.863 --> 0:13:50.503
<v S2>wouldn't have met the bar. You may want to start

0:13:50.503 --> 0:13:53.353
<v S2>thinking about that and then graduate to an explicit warning

0:13:53.353 --> 0:13:56.863
<v S2>with a time deadline to then eventually to a block.

0:13:56.863 --> 0:13:59.743
<v S2>And maybe even when they're blocked, you don't. You give

0:13:59.743 --> 0:14:03.403
<v S2>them one more snooze, right? And then they can still

0:14:03.403 --> 0:14:05.143
<v S2>get it if it's an emergency. So those are like

0:14:05.143 --> 0:14:08.053
<v S2>the types of human elements that we've built into the

0:14:08.053 --> 0:14:11.233
<v S2>collide platform, because now we've been running this app, we've

0:14:11.233 --> 0:14:12.883
<v S2>been selling this product for about a year. We're going

0:14:12.883 --> 0:14:15.493
<v S2>to continue to sell it at one password. And we've

0:14:15.493 --> 0:14:17.923
<v S2>learned a lot about how end users react to these

0:14:17.923 --> 0:14:21.463
<v S2>types of screens. And it's been incredibly effective, like all

0:14:21.463 --> 0:14:25.753
<v S2>of our customers today have essentially been able to achieve

0:14:25.753 --> 0:14:29.953
<v S2>perfect compliance and anything that they want by utilizing this mechanism,

0:14:29.953 --> 0:14:32.293
<v S2>which has been fantastic to see.

0:14:32.773 --> 0:14:36.343
<v S1>Yeah, I love the fact that it's enabling business to happen.

0:14:36.463 --> 0:14:39.763
<v S1>I also love the fact that you're using the best

0:14:39.763 --> 0:14:44.083
<v S1>possible resource for remediation, which everyone has been hesitant to do,

0:14:44.083 --> 0:14:46.963
<v S1>which is the person actually using the computer, and you're

0:14:46.963 --> 0:14:50.443
<v S1>sort of guiding them. And it's like, you know what

0:14:50.443 --> 0:14:53.323
<v S1>this reminds me of? And hopefully this isn't offensive in

0:14:53.323 --> 0:14:57.823
<v S1>any way. But, um, I've been like kind of marveling

0:14:57.823 --> 0:15:02.833
<v S1>at calendly. Yes. So it's like, okay, wait a minute.

0:15:02.833 --> 0:15:06.343
<v S1>What are you doing exactly? Like, how bad was this

0:15:06.343 --> 0:15:12.253
<v S1>problem before? Billions of people probably suffering from a problem that,

0:15:12.253 --> 0:15:16.123
<v S1>like the big tech scene has not solved, and someone

0:15:16.123 --> 0:15:22.153
<v S1>comes in and cleanly and, like, elegantly solves this one thing.

0:15:22.393 --> 0:15:25.543
<v S1>It's like what? In their case, it's like, how do

0:15:25.543 --> 0:15:28.423
<v S1>you share calendars? Okay, they make this one thing. It

0:15:28.423 --> 0:15:32.143
<v S1>doesn't do that much and it's amazing. And now everyone

0:15:32.143 --> 0:15:35.143
<v S1>uses it. And guess what? When the bigger people try

0:15:35.143 --> 0:15:39.313
<v S1>to compete, they cram all this extra stuff. They actually

0:15:39.313 --> 0:15:42.433
<v S1>miss the point of the app and end up making

0:15:42.433 --> 0:15:45.283
<v S1>something inferior. Even though they have a much larger team,

0:15:45.733 --> 0:15:48.613
<v S1>it's because they miss the philosophy of it, and I

0:15:48.613 --> 0:15:52.723
<v S1>feel like the collide product basically really understood the problem

0:15:52.723 --> 0:15:56.533
<v S1>and really understood not to over engineer the solution and

0:15:56.533 --> 0:15:59.983
<v S1>to kind of just make it as as clean as

0:15:59.983 --> 0:16:01.003
<v S1>it needed to be.

0:16:02.193 --> 0:16:04.983
<v S2>Yeah. And I think ultimately the reason why we were

0:16:04.983 --> 0:16:08.793
<v S2>able to see that problem isn't because, like, we're clairvoyant

0:16:08.793 --> 0:16:12.243
<v S2>or we understand it. I think we started off looking

0:16:12.243 --> 0:16:17.103
<v S2>to solve like fundamentally, I don't think that the existing

0:16:17.103 --> 0:16:21.483
<v S2>security solutions on the market are very human being friendly. Yeah.

0:16:21.483 --> 0:16:24.933
<v S2>And I wanted to build a security company that had

0:16:24.933 --> 0:16:27.243
<v S2>that as a core principle. So we were sort of

0:16:27.243 --> 0:16:29.493
<v S2>we knew that was an immutable part of collide. How

0:16:29.493 --> 0:16:32.193
<v S2>do we build something on top of that? The second

0:16:32.193 --> 0:16:34.803
<v S2>thing that is part of my DNA that sort of

0:16:34.803 --> 0:16:39.213
<v S2>informed this was I worked in manufacturing as a couple

0:16:39.213 --> 0:16:41.943
<v S2>of first jobs that I had and like, you know,

0:16:41.943 --> 0:16:44.523
<v S2>actually on the machine shop floor. And a big part

0:16:44.523 --> 0:16:48.873
<v S2>of that experience was safety training. And I remember, like

0:16:48.873 --> 0:16:53.013
<v S2>sitting down, you're getting the orientation. It's like making sure

0:16:53.013 --> 0:16:56.043
<v S2>that you're being aware of your surroundings and like, but

0:16:56.043 --> 0:16:58.053
<v S2>you learn about some of these systems that were put

0:16:58.053 --> 0:17:02.253
<v S2>in place and every single. Safety law and process is

0:17:02.253 --> 0:17:05.673
<v S2>written in blood, right? Like people died. And then they

0:17:05.673 --> 0:17:07.713
<v S2>figured out a way to stop that from happening. And

0:17:07.713 --> 0:17:09.693
<v S2>the one that really stuck out to me was this

0:17:09.693 --> 0:17:13.983
<v S2>concept of lock out tag out. So for the folks

0:17:13.983 --> 0:17:16.413
<v S2>who are not familiar with this, let's say you have

0:17:16.413 --> 0:17:20.043
<v S2>a really dangerous piece of equipment on the shop floor.

0:17:20.683 --> 0:17:24.793
<v S2>And someone needs to repair it. Well, previously before lock

0:17:24.793 --> 0:17:27.313
<v S2>out tag out, what would happen is that person would

0:17:27.313 --> 0:17:29.203
<v S2>climb and they would turn off the machine. They would

0:17:29.203 --> 0:17:32.023
<v S2>climb into it, and they'd probably tell everybody, hey, don't

0:17:32.023 --> 0:17:34.213
<v S2>use this machine because I'm going to be fixing it.

0:17:34.303 --> 0:17:36.673
<v S2>And then they'd repair it. And then what would happen

0:17:36.673 --> 0:17:39.403
<v S2>every once in a while is someone wouldn't realize someone

0:17:39.403 --> 0:17:42.193
<v S2>was in the machine. They would turn it on, and

0:17:42.193 --> 0:17:45.613
<v S2>then that person inside the machine would die. So that

0:17:45.613 --> 0:17:49.543
<v S2>was really bad outcome, obviously. And the problem was, is like,

0:17:49.543 --> 0:17:53.023
<v S2>no matter how much training you gave to be like,

0:17:53.023 --> 0:17:55.153
<v S2>always check inside the machine.

0:17:55.153 --> 0:17:55.603
<v S3>Yeah.

0:17:55.783 --> 0:18:00.313
<v S2>People were still dying. So the right solution wasn't more training.

0:18:00.313 --> 0:18:03.523
<v S2>And to give them more PowerPoints or more manuals or

0:18:03.523 --> 0:18:08.713
<v S2>scary videos, it was to actually engineer a system that

0:18:08.713 --> 0:18:12.313
<v S2>would hack around the fallibility of human beings and actually

0:18:12.313 --> 0:18:14.833
<v S2>solve it for good. Yeah. So the way lockout tag

0:18:14.953 --> 0:18:17.113
<v S2>works is when that same person is going to decide

0:18:17.113 --> 0:18:20.983
<v S2>to repair the machine, they actually go up to the

0:18:20.983 --> 0:18:23.893
<v S2>control panel and they lock out the controls, and they

0:18:23.893 --> 0:18:26.593
<v S2>take the key that is used to lock out the

0:18:26.593 --> 0:18:29.743
<v S2>controls with them, so that if anyone even tries to

0:18:29.743 --> 0:18:32.623
<v S2>turn on the machine, they can't do it because they

0:18:32.623 --> 0:18:34.903
<v S2>don't have the key to unlock the controls. It's with

0:18:34.903 --> 0:18:38.743
<v S2>the person. Yeah, who's physically repairing the machine. And that

0:18:38.743 --> 0:18:44.783
<v S2>one simple trick. Effectively eliminated that whole class of deaths

0:18:44.783 --> 0:18:48.653
<v S2>in on a machine shop floor. Well, I feel that

0:18:48.653 --> 0:18:51.653
<v S2>the problems that we face in the security space about

0:18:51.653 --> 0:18:53.813
<v S2>getting human beings to do things we're still stuck in,

0:18:53.813 --> 0:18:58.433
<v S2>like the old. 1920s and 1930s Industrial Revolution phase of

0:18:58.433 --> 0:19:00.503
<v S2>it where we're trying to we know that we need

0:19:00.503 --> 0:19:02.873
<v S2>to get end users to know how to do things.

0:19:02.873 --> 0:19:06.023
<v S2>But the the instruments that we're wielding today are all

0:19:06.023 --> 0:19:10.193
<v S2>training videos, you know, yelling at people when they're not

0:19:10.193 --> 0:19:14.753
<v S2>doing things right, adding MDM. But we really need human

0:19:14.753 --> 0:19:18.653
<v S2>based systems that understand human psychology. They understand how people operate.

0:19:18.653 --> 0:19:23.743
<v S2>They understand that. People need systems that will prevent the

0:19:23.743 --> 0:19:26.293
<v S2>thing from happening entirely. And that's what Callide is. I

0:19:26.293 --> 0:19:29.143
<v S2>think it's the first product on the market that takes

0:19:29.143 --> 0:19:33.253
<v S2>lessons learned from those safety industries, and then brings them

0:19:33.253 --> 0:19:36.973
<v S2>in to the world of cyber security and gets end

0:19:36.973 --> 0:19:41.953
<v S2>users at scale with almost perfect efficacy to solve problems.

0:19:41.953 --> 0:19:44.743
<v S2>And that's what we've built. And that's why one password

0:19:44.743 --> 0:19:47.773
<v S2>was really excited about what we're doing, because they see

0:19:47.773 --> 0:19:51.463
<v S2>their systems. And the way that they arrived with their

0:19:51.463 --> 0:19:54.013
<v S2>answers is very similar methodology.

0:19:55.003 --> 0:19:59.593
<v S1>Yeah, absolutely. That's, uh, that's really interesting. And I like

0:19:59.593 --> 0:20:01.513
<v S1>that story a lot. I've done a bunch of work

0:20:01.513 --> 0:20:03.823
<v S1>in the safety space as well, and they take it

0:20:03.823 --> 0:20:06.403
<v S1>very seriously. And like you said, when you care, you

0:20:06.403 --> 0:20:10.453
<v S1>engineer a solution that solves that problem. And, uh, yeah,

0:20:10.453 --> 0:20:14.593
<v S1>I really like that analogy. Well, where can everyone, uh,

0:20:15.103 --> 0:20:17.233
<v S1>find find out about the product.

0:20:18.353 --> 0:20:20.993
<v S2>Yeah. So you could still find us at Callide. Com.

0:20:20.993 --> 0:20:23.993
<v S2>And today we still sell to folks who have Okta

0:20:23.993 --> 0:20:26.513
<v S2>so that none of that's changing. We're still open for business,

0:20:26.513 --> 0:20:30.203
<v S2>we're still selling our product. And in fact, we're starting

0:20:30.233 --> 0:20:32.873
<v S2>to reach out now to folks who don't have Okta.

0:20:32.873 --> 0:20:36.803
<v S2>So if you have Google Workspace or use Microsoft Entra,

0:20:36.803 --> 0:20:38.933
<v S2>we have something in the works that we're going to

0:20:38.933 --> 0:20:40.913
<v S2>be launching later this year. And we want to start

0:20:40.913 --> 0:20:43.583
<v S2>talking to folks to get their insights on what we're

0:20:43.583 --> 0:20:46.433
<v S2>building and to get them in a place where they

0:20:46.433 --> 0:20:50.063
<v S2>get even beta test it. So if you have Okta

0:20:50.063 --> 0:20:52.943
<v S2>today and you want to use something like collide, go

0:20:52.943 --> 0:20:58.043
<v S2>to collide comm, collide comm. And if you have something

0:20:58.043 --> 0:21:00.953
<v S2>different that you use for single sign on, hit us

0:21:00.953 --> 0:21:02.753
<v S2>up as well and we'll have a chat.

0:21:03.663 --> 0:21:05.403
<v S1>Awesome. Great talking to you.

0:21:06.483 --> 0:21:07.893
<v S2>Thank you so much for having me.