WEBVTT - A Conversation with Patrick Duffy from Material Security

0:00:00.880 --> 0:00:05.040
<v S1>Unsupervised Learning is a podcast about trends and ideas in cybersecurity,

0:00:05.080 --> 0:00:10.000
<v S1>national security, AI, technology and society, and how best to

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:18.479
<v S1>upgrade ourselves to be ready for what's coming. All right, Patrick,

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:20.000
<v S1>welcome to Unsupervised Learning.

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:21.880
<v S2>Thanks, Daniel. Pleasure to be here.

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:28.760
<v S1>Yeah. So, um, last time I chatted with, uh, material, um,

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:33.160
<v S1>I spoke with Abhishek. We had a really interesting conversation, and, uh,

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.120
<v S1>what I really took away from that, that I found

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:38.839
<v S1>so interesting was like this focus on because I asked.

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.840
<v S1>I asked about, uh, detective controls, and he's like, yeah,

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:44.639
<v S1>it's not so much about detection. It's more about like

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:49.479
<v S1>putting on the seatbelts and preventative controls, like what happens

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:52.880
<v S1>after a breach. How do you limit the blast radius? Um,

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.520
<v S1>and I thought that was a really interesting characterization. Is

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:58.080
<v S1>that the way you think about it as well?

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.210
<v S2>Yeah, that's certainly a large part of it. And, you know,

0:01:01.250 --> 0:01:03.090
<v S2>when I think about what we're doing here at material,

0:01:03.090 --> 0:01:06.250
<v S2>it's actually the the seat belts, but also the brakes

0:01:06.250 --> 0:01:09.170
<v S2>as well, and picking up on the accidents before they happen.

0:01:09.569 --> 0:01:11.810
<v S2>So that's where we're heading as a, as a company of,

0:01:11.970 --> 0:01:14.649
<v S2>you know, not only doing the threat detection, making sure

0:01:14.650 --> 0:01:17.770
<v S2>that if and when something does does go kind of sideways,

0:01:17.770 --> 0:01:21.010
<v S2>we can stop that and prevent as much impact as

0:01:21.010 --> 0:01:21.490
<v S2>we can.

0:01:23.490 --> 0:01:29.450
<v S1>Yeah. That's fantastic. Um, so before we jump into the

0:01:29.450 --> 0:01:32.250
<v S1>product more deeply, uh, what types of stuff are you

0:01:32.250 --> 0:01:36.850
<v S1>seeing out there? Like, what types of threats are you seeing? Uh, attacks. Like,

0:01:36.850 --> 0:01:39.130
<v S1>where are the attackers doing currently?

0:01:39.250 --> 0:01:41.610
<v S2>Yeah. So one of the things we're seeing, uh, you know,

0:01:41.770 --> 0:01:43.890
<v S2>not going to be surprising, I think, to your audience,

0:01:43.930 --> 0:01:47.170
<v S2>is a lot of inbound phishing threats that are hitting organizations.

0:01:47.170 --> 0:01:49.930
<v S2>We know that that is a pretty, uh, popular entry

0:01:49.930 --> 0:01:53.690
<v S2>point into a lot of the infrastructure for teams. And

0:01:53.690 --> 0:01:56.450
<v S2>so we see that pretty frequently. But also, you know,

0:01:56.490 --> 0:01:58.930
<v S2>one of the things that is, I think, Underlooked, when

0:01:58.930 --> 0:02:01.190
<v S2>it comes to the cloud office. Is that lateral movement

0:02:01.190 --> 0:02:04.630
<v S2>across the cloud office? Right. So if you think about

0:02:04.630 --> 0:02:08.790
<v S2>the credentials for Google Workspace or M365, it's a pretty

0:02:08.790 --> 0:02:12.669
<v S2>valuable piece of information for the attacker, because for any

0:02:12.990 --> 0:02:15.829
<v S2>employee at an organization, it's the first thing that they

0:02:15.830 --> 0:02:17.990
<v S2>get when they onboard and the last thing that they

0:02:17.990 --> 0:02:20.790
<v S2>have when they off right before they off board. So

0:02:20.950 --> 0:02:22.830
<v S2>that's usually the keys to the kingdom when it comes

0:02:22.830 --> 0:02:26.269
<v S2>to not only other tools, but also within the organization.

0:02:26.270 --> 0:02:28.630
<v S2>So you can move pretty freely once you have access

0:02:28.910 --> 0:02:32.709
<v S2>to somebody's email credentials, to head across the shared drives

0:02:32.710 --> 0:02:35.150
<v S2>and all that sensitive information, which can be pretty damaging

0:02:35.150 --> 0:02:37.030
<v S2>as we've seen with past breaches.

0:02:38.150 --> 0:02:40.550
<v S1>Yeah, so that makes sense. So it's not only access

0:02:40.550 --> 0:02:43.790
<v S1>to email, but like you said, it's Google Docs, it's drives.

0:02:43.790 --> 0:02:47.149
<v S1>It's um, I mean, that's the power of the ecosystem

0:02:47.389 --> 0:02:50.390
<v S1>is that you can move around, right. So that same

0:02:50.470 --> 0:02:52.669
<v S1>same advantage is for the attacker.

0:02:52.710 --> 0:02:53.230
<v S2>Yeah. And it's.

0:02:53.230 --> 0:02:53.590
<v S1>Also.

0:02:53.790 --> 0:02:55.910
<v S2>Sorry I just want to jump in as well. It's interesting. Right.

0:02:55.910 --> 0:02:58.590
<v S2>Because it's such a collaboration tool. It's also a challenge

0:02:58.590 --> 0:03:01.160
<v S2>for security teams. And one of the problems and challenges

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:04.000
<v S2>we're seeing is trying to not be just the Department

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:07.840
<v S2>of No, but of facilitating collaboration across security, IT and

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.360
<v S2>their other colleagues. So you can't just shut down email,

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:12.799
<v S2>you can't just shut down access to drive. You have

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:16.040
<v S2>to rightsize who gets access to what and when. And

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:17.720
<v S2>so we have a lot of tools to help support

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:18.839
<v S2>that for our customers.

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:23.120
<v S1>Okay. So what does that look like? Is that a

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.840
<v S1>specific product for the Google space or what is that.

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:28.840
<v S2>Yeah. So it's a capability that comes with our product

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:31.480
<v S2>out of the box where we're able to enable just

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:35.080
<v S2>in time access and toufar controls for sensitive documents and

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:37.520
<v S2>documents that have basically aged out of a grace period.

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:40.200
<v S2>And so you can say, you know, within two weeks,

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:42.840
<v S2>let's put a toufar block on anything that has financial

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:45.840
<v S2>information across the organization or for these subsets of users.

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:49.480
<v S2>Let's put Toufar behind all historical emails in their inbox.

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.600
<v S2>So if a hacker does get access to their credentials,

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:56.080
<v S2>they can't just run wild and export data with sensitive information,

0:03:56.080 --> 0:04:00.330
<v S2>proprietary information, things that could lead to real, substantial harm

0:04:00.330 --> 0:04:04.490
<v S2>to an organization either reputationally or from a business impact perspective.

0:04:06.490 --> 0:04:11.330
<v S1>I find this whole concept really, really cool. So so again,

0:04:11.330 --> 0:04:13.850
<v S1>it's not about a sensor. It's not about, oh, I

0:04:13.890 --> 0:04:17.810
<v S1>detected this. Let me make this change. It's like, look,

0:04:17.810 --> 0:04:22.690
<v S1>we have this giant lake or ecosystem of sensitive content

0:04:23.450 --> 0:04:27.170
<v S1>and data, and there are things we could be doing

0:04:27.170 --> 0:04:32.570
<v S1>right now. Like you said, time based that are just

0:04:32.610 --> 0:04:37.969
<v S1>like tweaking the knobs for settings and lockdown and configurations.

0:04:38.490 --> 0:04:41.690
<v S1>So I guess there's if I'm thinking about this from

0:04:41.730 --> 0:04:46.010
<v S1>like a fundamental standpoint, there's like, um, things you have

0:04:46.010 --> 0:04:51.929
<v S1>to lock down. There's identity you could use, there's granular permissions.

0:04:52.410 --> 0:04:57.250
<v S1>And so the product seems to be like just deciding

0:04:57.250 --> 0:05:00.230
<v S1>what ideal might look like or something like that, and

0:05:00.230 --> 0:05:03.070
<v S1>just going in and making those tweaks kind of on

0:05:03.070 --> 0:05:04.870
<v S1>a continuous basis. Is that right?

0:05:04.910 --> 0:05:08.309
<v S2>Yeah, it's on a continuous basis. And it's also contextually aware. Right.

0:05:08.310 --> 0:05:10.750
<v S2>So you have to be able to understand where your

0:05:10.750 --> 0:05:13.909
<v S2>employees are logging in from at an individual level on

0:05:13.910 --> 0:05:15.990
<v S2>the regular, you know, on a regular basis. Because if

0:05:15.990 --> 0:05:18.510
<v S2>I'm logging in from the East coast of the United

0:05:18.510 --> 0:05:22.070
<v S2>States regularly and then you see a login from, you know,

0:05:22.110 --> 0:05:25.190
<v S2>somewhere in Western Europe or around the globe where I'm

0:05:25.190 --> 0:05:28.430
<v S2>not usually that should raise some alarms, right? And you

0:05:28.710 --> 0:05:31.470
<v S2>might have some tools that will kind of flag that,

0:05:31.470 --> 0:05:33.990
<v S2>but that might be in isolation. And same thing with

0:05:33.990 --> 0:05:36.750
<v S2>your DLP tool like oh there are some sensitive searches happening,

0:05:36.750 --> 0:05:39.230
<v S2>but that will happen in isolation. And you really need

0:05:39.230 --> 0:05:41.310
<v S2>a tool that will help connect the dots of saying,

0:05:41.550 --> 0:05:44.550
<v S2>we noticed a login and then we noticed some suspicious activity,

0:05:44.550 --> 0:05:47.630
<v S2>and then we noticed some data exfiltration happening. Or, you know,

0:05:47.670 --> 0:05:49.630
<v S2>for us, the ideal state of what we're building for

0:05:49.670 --> 0:05:51.950
<v S2>is that whole throughput of, you know, if there's a

0:05:51.990 --> 0:05:55.070
<v S2>novel attack happening via the inbox and the email threats

0:05:55.070 --> 0:05:58.240
<v S2>that we're seeing and that, you know, a user might

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:00.360
<v S2>click through something or go to a login page that

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.359
<v S2>has a credential harvester of knowing that they got a

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:06.160
<v S2>suspicious email, and then they click through. And then we

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.760
<v S2>saw the suspicious login and then the weird anomalous activity

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.680
<v S2>being able to connect those dots together. Because what I've

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:14.920
<v S2>seen in my experience is point to do a pretty

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:18.080
<v S2>good job of picking up those individual data points. But

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:21.160
<v S2>it's taking a step back and seeing the full mosaic,

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.719
<v S2>so to speak, and having a clear understanding is that's

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.040
<v S2>where there's steam. Teams are still having a lot of

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:29.560
<v S2>trouble and, you know, doing a lot of work themselves

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:31.200
<v S2>that they don't necessarily need to.

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:36.440
<v S1>Okay. So let me rethink then. So so you are

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:41.440
<v S1>doing some uh, current context analysis of like what's currently

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.440
<v S1>going on. So I guess that is so what are

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:47.239
<v S1>the sources for that. What are you able to see.

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:51.120
<v S1>Is that all within like a Google Workspace, the logs

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:53.760
<v S1>that you're using or is that other. Do you have

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:56.280
<v S1>other telemetry other signal from other systems?

0:06:56.320 --> 0:07:00.730
<v S2>Yeah. So uh, Google Workspace or Microsoft 365 or certainly

0:07:00.770 --> 0:07:02.930
<v S2>it's a pretty big source of data for us. We

0:07:02.930 --> 0:07:07.010
<v S2>also do in incorporate other third party intelligence tools that

0:07:07.010 --> 0:07:10.330
<v S2>you would expect for a security product. Um, that really

0:07:10.330 --> 0:07:12.890
<v S2>allows us to say, you know, once we see something

0:07:12.970 --> 0:07:15.410
<v S2>suspicious happening, let's put things on lockdown, let's make sure

0:07:15.410 --> 0:07:19.090
<v S2>that things are, are right sized for in terms of access,

0:07:19.090 --> 0:07:21.490
<v S2>or we can revoke access if we notice that there's

0:07:21.490 --> 0:07:24.489
<v S2>an issue that's been raised of a user with a

0:07:24.530 --> 0:07:28.210
<v S2>suspicious login and a file share to a third party

0:07:28.210 --> 0:07:30.770
<v S2>that is, you know, basically unsanctioned.

0:07:32.010 --> 0:07:34.770
<v S1>Okay, so so walk me through like a scenario here.

0:07:34.770 --> 0:07:37.690
<v S1>So I think I think you were giving me an

0:07:37.690 --> 0:07:41.610
<v S1>example earlier. So it's like, um, is it a strange

0:07:41.610 --> 0:07:44.410
<v S1>time of night or a strange geo that the person

0:07:44.410 --> 0:07:47.090
<v S1>logs in with, like what are the various triggers that

0:07:47.090 --> 0:07:48.330
<v S1>could that can get this going?

0:07:48.370 --> 0:07:50.610
<v S2>Yeah, it could be, uh, you know, noticing a pattern

0:07:50.650 --> 0:07:53.530
<v S2>of successive failed logins. So if somebody's trying to brute

0:07:53.530 --> 0:07:55.970
<v S2>force a password and then they finally get in, we

0:07:55.970 --> 0:07:59.590
<v S2>might pop a notification that says, you know, user has

0:07:59.630 --> 0:08:02.190
<v S2>a login from a, you know, after a suspicious or

0:08:02.310 --> 0:08:06.030
<v S2>brute force attempt. Um, and then we saw anomalous search

0:08:06.030 --> 0:08:10.150
<v S2>activity on the drive. And then the administrators can, within

0:08:10.150 --> 0:08:12.750
<v S2>our product, have already set up some automation that will

0:08:12.750 --> 0:08:15.830
<v S2>say revoke external access to that, to those files that

0:08:15.830 --> 0:08:19.510
<v S2>are being shared after that suspicious search. And so you

0:08:19.510 --> 0:08:22.670
<v S2>can automatically with our product say, you know, once you've

0:08:22.670 --> 0:08:26.270
<v S2>seen 1 in 2, go do the third thing automatically

0:08:26.270 --> 0:08:28.830
<v S2>to revoke the access. And therefore the data shouldn't be

0:08:28.830 --> 0:08:33.309
<v S2>leaving the building. Um, for anybody outside of the registered domains.

0:08:33.830 --> 0:08:38.069
<v S1>Okay. So those are pre-set up. So those are preventative. Yep. Uh,

0:08:38.110 --> 0:08:41.230
<v S1>is there anything that's like dynamically happening uh, to like,

0:08:41.230 --> 0:08:43.150
<v S1>dynamically write some of those rules?

0:08:43.510 --> 0:08:45.470
<v S2>Um, so our team is we have a team of

0:08:45.470 --> 0:08:48.670
<v S2>three researchers, and we also use AI. As you know,

0:08:48.670 --> 0:08:52.230
<v S2>a lot of the companies are today, um, to analyze

0:08:52.230 --> 0:08:54.310
<v S2>our rule sets and make sure that we're really being

0:08:54.309 --> 0:08:57.640
<v S2>really precise with, um, the roles that we're writing, but

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:00.720
<v S2>also our customers can come in and write the custom

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.839
<v S2>rules based off of very specific threats that they're thinking about,

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:07.000
<v S2>or wanting to be proactive around data sets that isn't

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:11.320
<v S2>necessarily super sensitive, but important to their organization. You know,

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:13.800
<v S2>an example that we, you know, we've seen a couple

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.480
<v S2>of times is around some notes for board meetings where

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:19.120
<v S2>there might not be sensitive information in there, per se,

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:22.480
<v S2>but you don't want those getting out. And so customers

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:24.760
<v S2>can set up rules for saying, you know, if it

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:28.560
<v S2>goes to X, y, z domain or XYZ email address,

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:32.120
<v S2>you know, let's put that behind the toufar. Um, for

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:34.040
<v S2>any access for that document.

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:39.480
<v S1>Yeah, that makes sense. And are there different, um, sets

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.360
<v S1>of templates. So like if there's a particular customer that

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:45.559
<v S1>comes on, is there like a threat model for that

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:47.960
<v S1>particular kind of customer where they would want to install

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.959
<v S1>a whole bunch of these preventative things, like all as,

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:52.280
<v S1>like a group or a cluster?

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.120
<v S2>Um, not today. One of the things we are thinking

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:58.890
<v S2>about and engaging in conversations with our customers with is

0:09:59.090 --> 0:10:01.490
<v S2>really trying to rightsize what that looks like based off

0:10:01.490 --> 0:10:04.010
<v S2>of the threat plane. Um, so, you know, we work

0:10:04.010 --> 0:10:07.010
<v S2>with financial services companies and we're seeing something, but that's

0:10:07.010 --> 0:10:11.089
<v S2>also fairly similar to healthcare. Um, and so we're starting to,

0:10:11.130 --> 0:10:13.970
<v S2>to group things like that. Um, you know, if it's a,

0:10:14.010 --> 0:10:16.929
<v S2>you know, an upcoming SaaS startup with a small security

0:10:16.970 --> 0:10:19.090
<v S2>team that's a different set of profiling that they want

0:10:19.130 --> 0:10:21.570
<v S2>to do. And so, um, you know, we're starting to,

0:10:21.610 --> 0:10:24.170
<v S2>to work towards that. Um, and that's definitely an evolution

0:10:24.170 --> 0:10:25.250
<v S2>of our product that's coming.

0:10:26.690 --> 0:10:31.370
<v S1>Okay. But when somebody onboards what what all gets turned

0:10:31.370 --> 0:10:35.090
<v S1>on automatically, is it a number of. Yeah. These preventative

0:10:35.090 --> 0:10:38.010
<v S1>controls are already just by default there. Right.

0:10:38.050 --> 0:10:41.410
<v S2>Yeah. So we have, um, you know, in the hundreds

0:10:41.410 --> 0:10:44.450
<v S2>of rules at this point between our email and cloud office.

0:10:44.570 --> 0:10:47.370
<v S2>Um threat suite, um, that are on by default when

0:10:47.370 --> 0:10:50.130
<v S2>somebody signs up for material. So this includes things like

0:10:50.130 --> 0:10:52.689
<v S2>all of our inbound threat email threat detection rules, but

0:10:52.690 --> 0:10:56.790
<v S2>also suspicious file shares. um, you know, alerting to risky

0:10:56.790 --> 0:10:59.990
<v S2>configurations as well inside of the workspace. So, you know,

0:11:00.030 --> 0:11:01.790
<v S2>the way we're thinking about this in terms of an

0:11:01.830 --> 0:11:05.150
<v S2>analogy is something like EDR for the cloud office or,

0:11:05.470 --> 0:11:08.230
<v S2>you know, using an example for, you know, it's been

0:11:08.230 --> 0:11:11.150
<v S2>the headlines over the last week was for Google Workspace.

0:11:11.510 --> 0:11:13.270
<v S2>And so thinking about how do we give that full

0:11:13.270 --> 0:11:16.870
<v S2>visibility and rule set for customers and their teams to

0:11:16.910 --> 0:11:19.470
<v S2>be able to really identify where there's the most risk

0:11:19.470 --> 0:11:21.390
<v S2>and then remediate it out of the box?

0:11:22.750 --> 0:11:26.270
<v S1>Yeah, that makes sense. So it sounds like you're you're

0:11:26.270 --> 0:11:30.550
<v S1>very much focused on this, uh, type of functionality. But

0:11:30.550 --> 0:11:32.070
<v S1>what are some of the attacks that you're seeing in

0:11:32.070 --> 0:11:32.750
<v S1>that space?

0:11:33.190 --> 0:11:36.590
<v S2>Um, yeah. So it's, um, you know, some of the

0:11:36.590 --> 0:11:38.750
<v S2>malicious actors are still, you know, phishing, trying to get

0:11:38.750 --> 0:11:42.030
<v S2>the credentials, but also it's the inadvertent sharing. Um, so

0:11:42.030 --> 0:11:44.550
<v S2>it's not necessarily an attack, but it's risk to the

0:11:44.550 --> 0:11:48.790
<v S2>organization of a lot, you know, employees sharing sensitive documents

0:11:48.790 --> 0:11:51.430
<v S2>to be set to anyone with a link can see

0:11:51.429 --> 0:11:54.600
<v S2>it and just public shares where, you know, data leakage

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.040
<v S2>like that can be pretty damaging for organizations. And so

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:59.400
<v S2>that's that's an area where we've seen a surprisingly high

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:02.160
<v S2>number of issues being raised by our product so far

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:05.520
<v S2>of sensitive documents being shared to the entire world.

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:11.719
<v S1>Yeah, I love that. I love the fact that it

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:16.760
<v S1>doesn't have to be like, um, a front page news

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:20.120
<v S1>article like Sexy Attacker that's doing the damage. It could

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:24.319
<v S1>be the benign user who just made a mistake. And

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.719
<v S1>because both of those are risks, both of those are

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:29.040
<v S1>handled via rules, right?

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:30.400
<v S2>Yep. Exactly.

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:35.800
<v S1>Yeah. Awesome. What are some other, um, abuse cases? Uh,

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:39.720
<v S1>not so much attacker based, but, um, like, what are

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:41.920
<v S1>some of the other pieces that the rules cover?

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:45.120
<v S2>Yeah. So it's things like, uh, best practice configuration for

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:48.720
<v S2>the cloud office. So, you know, one example that, um,

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:54.130
<v S2>I have is organizations that might set group moderation settings

0:12:54.130 --> 0:12:58.490
<v S2>to be able to be interacted with externally. And so

0:12:58.490 --> 0:13:00.130
<v S2>if we think about that, right. So if you have

0:13:00.130 --> 0:13:05.090
<v S2>a group of VIPs, if, if that group is externally visible,

0:13:05.090 --> 0:13:08.850
<v S2>somebody can then just email bomb campaign, their VIP team

0:13:08.890 --> 0:13:11.370
<v S2>or you know, their, their C-suite. And so that is

0:13:11.410 --> 0:13:13.890
<v S2>can be hugely disruptive to businesses. If there's all of

0:13:13.890 --> 0:13:17.450
<v S2>a sudden a DDoS campaign on the inbox because they're,

0:13:17.610 --> 0:13:20.250
<v S2>you know, a group of malicious actors is actually just

0:13:20.290 --> 0:13:23.170
<v S2>spamming the inbox and filling it up. Um, so that's,

0:13:23.210 --> 0:13:25.690
<v S2>you know, that's another thing we've seen quite a few times, actually,

0:13:25.690 --> 0:13:29.650
<v S2>where some moderation settings weren't quite, uh, optimized. And then

0:13:29.890 --> 0:13:33.569
<v S2>from there, their executives, uh, inboxes were just totally filled

0:13:33.570 --> 0:13:35.730
<v S2>up because of a harassment campaign.

0:13:37.730 --> 0:13:41.210
<v S1>Okay, so, so humor me on this. Um, I'm trying

0:13:41.210 --> 0:13:43.770
<v S1>to think of all the different granular controls you could

0:13:43.770 --> 0:13:48.090
<v S1>possibly do. Um, so, so what are some of the

0:13:48.490 --> 0:13:51.930
<v S1>some of the control points you could prompt for MFA

0:13:51.929 --> 0:13:57.070
<v S1>if you see something suspicious. Um, you could remove access via, like,

0:13:57.110 --> 0:14:00.390
<v S1>an ACL type control. You could have, like, a time

0:14:00.429 --> 0:14:02.950
<v S1>based control if, like, something is outside of a certain

0:14:02.950 --> 0:14:08.790
<v S1>time window. Yep. Um, what's another signal? Geo based signal?

0:14:08.830 --> 0:14:11.230
<v S2>Yeah. So based off of IP address where we're seeing

0:14:11.230 --> 0:14:14.590
<v S2>the logins. Um, also who they share with usually versus

0:14:14.670 --> 0:14:16.990
<v S2>who they're sharing with in frequency of shares is something

0:14:16.990 --> 0:14:19.350
<v S2>we're looking at. And so you know, we look for

0:14:19.350 --> 0:14:21.710
<v S2>not only like the anomalous search and activity within the drive,

0:14:21.750 --> 0:14:25.229
<v S2>but are you starting to email folks within your organization

0:14:25.230 --> 0:14:27.870
<v S2>that you don't normally email. Right. So those sort of pattern.

0:14:27.910 --> 0:14:28.510
<v S1>There you go.

0:14:28.710 --> 0:14:33.110
<v S2>Outside of, you know, outside of the normal, um, kind

0:14:33.110 --> 0:14:35.590
<v S2>of I would say, you know, kind of base level

0:14:36.510 --> 0:14:39.750
<v S2>data points of picking up where real anomalies that this

0:14:39.750 --> 0:14:42.030
<v S2>is unusual for a user based off of what we

0:14:42.030 --> 0:14:42.910
<v S2>usually see.

0:14:44.150 --> 0:14:47.590
<v S1>And how about like a classification or a content type.

0:14:47.630 --> 0:14:49.350
<v S1>Are you able to see anything like that?

0:14:49.390 --> 0:14:52.920
<v S2>Yeah. So we classify everything in the drive based off

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:55.040
<v S2>of the type of information that's there. So we pick

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:59.120
<v S2>up on things like Social Security numbers, financial information. Customers

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:03.640
<v S2>can also add additional custom tags for things like proprietary information.

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:06.640
<v S2>And so you know and that integrates directly with Google

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:09.440
<v S2>Workspace where, you know, if somebody puts that tag on

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:12.400
<v S2>a document, we'll obviously pick it up and then some.

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:14.720
<v S2>The security team can then remediate and protect it as,

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:15.480
<v S2>as they want.

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:24.480
<v S1>Okay. And then you mentioned particular drives internally. What what

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:28.320
<v S1>about threat intelligence on or at least basic threat intelligence

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:32.840
<v S1>on like oh, it's pastebin. Uh, this very sensitive thing

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.760
<v S1>is being put on pastebin, which everyone knows is like

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.000
<v S1>a dump site. Is that the type of thing you

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:38.920
<v S1>can get signal from?

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:41.640
<v S2>Yeah, yeah, we're pulling in, um, you know, things like

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:44.000
<v S2>that of, you know, have I been owned? Uh, sorts

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:46.040
<v S2>of websites of being able to pull that Intel for

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.920
<v S2>accounts and other sorts of information. Um, you know, we're

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:54.050
<v S2>also looking out for, um, Impersonation campaigns on login site

0:15:54.090 --> 0:15:57.010
<v S2>login sites. So, um, you know, taking kind of the

0:15:57.010 --> 0:16:02.130
<v S2>IP and um, other information from customer, an organization profile

0:16:02.130 --> 0:16:03.970
<v S2>and how malicious actors are using it and try and

0:16:03.970 --> 0:16:04.890
<v S2>protect against that.

0:16:06.890 --> 0:16:10.650
<v S1>Yeah, that's really cool. Okay. So you said you have

0:16:10.650 --> 0:16:15.770
<v S1>like hundreds of rules. That's that's the basic, uh, magnitude there.

0:16:16.450 --> 0:16:19.730
<v S1>And that would be these various combinations of these different

0:16:19.730 --> 0:16:22.410
<v S1>signals combined with the different control point. Right.

0:16:22.450 --> 0:16:23.410
<v S2>Yep. Exactly.

0:16:23.490 --> 0:16:31.770
<v S1>Um, interesting. Yeah. Any, um, any other thoughts on, um,

0:16:32.090 --> 0:16:36.690
<v S1>the functionality here or the types of attacks that it's, uh, detecting?

0:16:37.210 --> 0:16:40.330
<v S2>Um, really the thing that I'm excited about that we're

0:16:40.330 --> 0:16:42.970
<v S2>picking up on and helping protect against is really the

0:16:43.090 --> 0:16:46.490
<v S2>lateral movement across the workspace while not getting in the

0:16:46.490 --> 0:16:50.210
<v S2>way of productivity for the organizations. Because, you know, I

0:16:50.250 --> 0:16:52.430
<v S2>you know, I've been in security for a few years now. And,

0:16:52.470 --> 0:16:54.350
<v S2>you know, one of the things that's, um, you know,

0:16:54.390 --> 0:16:58.630
<v S2>really interesting to see is how passionate security professionals are

0:16:58.670 --> 0:17:00.910
<v S2>about trying to stop the threat, but also how afraid

0:17:00.910 --> 0:17:03.310
<v S2>they are of getting in the way of business operations.

0:17:03.670 --> 0:17:05.230
<v S2>And I've seen a little bit of a gun shy

0:17:05.270 --> 0:17:07.229
<v S2>mentality at times of like, hey, should I go do

0:17:07.230 --> 0:17:09.869
<v S2>this remediation? Should I, you know, cut off this box

0:17:09.869 --> 0:17:12.470
<v S2>from the internet? Well, I know that the attacker is there,

0:17:12.470 --> 0:17:14.270
<v S2>so yes, you should. But I also know that this

0:17:14.270 --> 0:17:16.870
<v S2>is a pretty important laptop, right? And so being able

0:17:16.869 --> 0:17:19.350
<v S2>to then connect the dots of this lateral movement. And

0:17:19.390 --> 0:17:22.510
<v S2>now the office where everyone is working, uh, you know,

0:17:22.550 --> 0:17:24.710
<v S2>in the cloud, it's, it's pretty cool to be able

0:17:24.710 --> 0:17:26.590
<v S2>to then say like, hey, we are actually with pretty

0:17:26.590 --> 0:17:31.390
<v S2>high fidelity picking up the suspicious login, the suspicious drive activity,

0:17:31.390 --> 0:17:33.350
<v S2>and then shutting it down in a way that the

0:17:33.350 --> 0:17:36.510
<v S2>user might not even realize how they're being protected at

0:17:36.510 --> 0:17:38.030
<v S2>the end of the day, because we're not kicking them

0:17:38.030 --> 0:17:41.669
<v S2>out of their session immediately. We're protecting the the data first,

0:17:41.670 --> 0:17:43.750
<v S2>and then allowing the security team to then go follow

0:17:43.750 --> 0:17:45.149
<v S2>up and say with the user like, hey, just so

0:17:45.150 --> 0:17:47.270
<v S2>you know, we've been compromised, we're going to shut down,

0:17:47.310 --> 0:17:48.990
<v S2>you know, revoke access to your account for a second.

0:17:48.990 --> 0:17:52.119
<v S2>We'll do a password reset, which we can also support.

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:54.440
<v S2>And so that's all within the realm of being able

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:58.240
<v S2>to really work collaboratively, collaboratively with colleagues for security team

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:01.360
<v S2>versus just coming in and being a disruptive force for

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:02.320
<v S2>the organization.

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:06.600
<v S1>Yeah. Interesting. So what does that interaction look like? How

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:11.080
<v S1>do you let them know or how does that interaction

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.720
<v S1>happen when you feel like you're dealing with something that's

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:18.119
<v S1>live and like has to be dealt with right now? Um,

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.560
<v S1>so are you, uh, is it a text platform? Is

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:24.200
<v S1>it an email or like, how are they getting that?

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.920
<v S2>Yeah. So our customers can integrate us into their entire workflow.

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:31.000
<v S2>So we integrate with tools like Pagerduty, slack. You know,

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:34.200
<v S2>we integrate with tools like tines. And so any automation

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:36.919
<v S2>workflow that will then take that signal from us and

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:39.480
<v S2>you can run with it automatically is something we support.

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:42.080
<v S2>And so, you know, for security teams, they can sign

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:44.560
<v S2>up for a slack notification when they get a high

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:47.480
<v S2>or critical alert from us. And that'll drop into their,

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:49.600
<v S2>you know, security team channel that they may have configured

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.770
<v S2>for material inside of their workspace, inside of their slack workspace.

0:18:53.369 --> 0:18:55.689
<v S2>And then from there they can, you know, decide to

0:18:55.690 --> 0:18:57.850
<v S2>action it. They can let their automation tool take care

0:18:57.850 --> 0:18:59.850
<v S2>of it, or they can reach out out of band

0:18:59.850 --> 0:19:02.410
<v S2>for their, you know, for their colleagues, of letting them know, like, hey, like,

0:19:02.450 --> 0:19:05.250
<v S2>we know we've protected the document. That's cool. We now

0:19:05.250 --> 0:19:07.730
<v S2>need to reset, you know, the password, and we'll make

0:19:07.730 --> 0:19:09.330
<v S2>sure that you do that in a timely manner.

0:19:10.410 --> 0:19:13.290
<v S1>That makes sense. And when you talk about the lateral

0:19:13.290 --> 0:19:17.330
<v S1>movement piece, give me an example of, um, you talking

0:19:17.330 --> 0:19:22.730
<v S1>about an active attacker doing that or are you talking about. Um, yeah. Exactly.

0:19:22.730 --> 0:19:24.290
<v S1>What do you mean by the lateral movement?

0:19:24.330 --> 0:19:26.649
<v S2>Yeah. So it is an active attacker. So once, you know,

0:19:26.690 --> 0:19:30.050
<v S2>credentials have been, you know, stolen and somebody is able

0:19:30.050 --> 0:19:32.570
<v S2>to log into an organization, you know, that might not

0:19:32.570 --> 0:19:35.930
<v S2>have MFA or they've bypassed MFA. Once we start seeing

0:19:35.930 --> 0:19:39.770
<v S2>that anomalous login or the anomalous search activity, we'll be

0:19:39.810 --> 0:19:43.730
<v S2>able to then shut down the the attack by putting

0:19:43.730 --> 0:19:47.410
<v S2>everything behind the toufar for a customer at that moment. Or, um,

0:19:47.450 --> 0:19:49.970
<v S2>you know, if that's already pre-configured as a general protection,

0:19:50.030 --> 0:19:51.310
<v S2>They don't have to worry about that.

0:19:53.270 --> 0:19:56.230
<v S1>Okay. Yeah that's interesting. So normally they would have been

0:19:56.230 --> 0:20:00.670
<v S1>able to just pull up files from a given share.

0:20:01.109 --> 0:20:06.230
<v S1>But because they did this sensitive activity that looks anomalous,

0:20:07.150 --> 0:20:10.390
<v S1>it doesn't stop them, but it just puts up the

0:20:10.390 --> 0:20:13.870
<v S1>toufar to just guarantee that they're actually who they say

0:20:13.869 --> 0:20:14.429
<v S1>they are.

0:20:14.470 --> 0:20:17.149
<v S2>Yeah, yeah. And customers can also dial this in to

0:20:17.190 --> 0:20:19.629
<v S2>the severity that they wish. So you know, we have

0:20:19.630 --> 0:20:22.030
<v S2>some customers that will say, you know what. As soon

0:20:22.030 --> 0:20:24.949
<v S2>as we see this suspicious login, revoke the session, reset

0:20:24.950 --> 0:20:27.790
<v S2>the password. You know, no matter what's going on with

0:20:27.790 --> 0:20:31.429
<v S2>the okay. But other organizations will say, you know what?

0:20:31.470 --> 0:20:34.590
<v S2>Like what I really care about is the sensitive documents

0:20:34.590 --> 0:20:36.630
<v S2>and not being disruptive to my colleagues. And they have

0:20:36.630 --> 0:20:39.910
<v S2>that configurability within the product where they can really set

0:20:39.910 --> 0:20:41.950
<v S2>their threshold for how much risk they want to take

0:20:41.950 --> 0:20:45.070
<v S2>on or disruption they want to bring to the organization. Because,

0:20:45.230 --> 0:20:48.550
<v S2>you know, past lives, I've seen instances where the security

0:20:48.550 --> 0:20:52.080
<v S2>team has found ransomware on a machine, and it happened

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:53.880
<v S2>to be for an executive who was about to give

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:57.159
<v S2>a board presentation. And so, you know, it's one of

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.840
<v S2>those like, situations where you really want to try and

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:02.960
<v S2>think about how your organization works and rightsize the response.

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:05.239
<v S2>And we're trying to enable that by picking up the

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:08.800
<v S2>signal all the way across the spectrum and allowing security

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:11.040
<v S2>teams to choose when is the right time for them

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:14.359
<v S2>to respond for specific sorts of threats within the product.

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:20.560
<v S1>Yeah. And like you said, to adjust the control set

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:24.520
<v S1>according to the risk appetite for that organization. Right. Um, yeah.

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:27.879
<v S1>I love the fact that you can switch right into

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:32.600
<v S1>ATO if, uh, the security team wants to, but if

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.960
<v S1>there's like a culture of like, no, that's too extreme.

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:40.400
<v S1>And that would make the security team look bad or whatever.

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:45.000
<v S1>We need a more gentle approach. Let's just prompt for, uh, MFA.

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.760
<v S2>Yeah, exactly. And, you know, one of the up and

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:50.530
<v S2>coming use cases that I've had some conversation with customers

0:21:50.530 --> 0:21:52.610
<v S2>about that I think is is also pretty interesting, is

0:21:52.609 --> 0:21:57.370
<v S2>around sharing of documents internally and starting to enable tools

0:21:57.369 --> 0:22:00.489
<v S2>like Google's Gemini inside of the workspace. And so if

0:22:00.490 --> 0:22:04.090
<v S2>there is sensitive information inside of a document that is

0:22:04.090 --> 0:22:07.370
<v S2>unknowingly shared to everyone at the organization, that also means

0:22:07.369 --> 0:22:09.050
<v S2>that Gemini can pick up on that. So that could

0:22:09.050 --> 0:22:13.210
<v S2>include things like compensation and other bits of sensitive information

0:22:13.210 --> 0:22:16.770
<v S2>that you might not want somebody to very easily query

0:22:16.770 --> 0:22:19.810
<v S2>inside of Gemini. And so yeah, it may have been

0:22:19.810 --> 0:22:21.570
<v S2>harder to find in the past, but now it becomes

0:22:21.609 --> 0:22:23.770
<v S2>a lot easier to find with gen AI entering into

0:22:23.770 --> 0:22:25.530
<v S2>the workspace a little more proactively.

0:22:26.450 --> 0:22:30.250
<v S1>Okay. And and what is the, um, the signal pickup there? Like,

0:22:30.290 --> 0:22:32.970
<v S1>how are we finding out what they're doing?

0:22:33.170 --> 0:22:34.970
<v S2>Yeah. And so with that, we have a rule where

0:22:34.970 --> 0:22:38.090
<v S2>it is, uh, document has sensitive information and it is

0:22:38.090 --> 0:22:39.730
<v S2>shared with the entire organization.

0:22:40.690 --> 0:22:41.050
<v S1>Okay.

0:22:41.130 --> 0:22:43.369
<v S2>And so, you know, even something like that, a customer

0:22:43.369 --> 0:22:46.690
<v S2>can then say, okay, you know, email the owner letting

0:22:46.690 --> 0:22:50.070
<v S2>them know that they have this pretty over permissive sharing

0:22:50.109 --> 0:22:53.070
<v S2>enabled for this file, and then give them six hours

0:22:53.070 --> 0:22:57.070
<v S2>to remediate it. Otherwise then revoke access and set it

0:22:57.070 --> 0:22:57.750
<v S2>to private.

0:22:58.790 --> 0:23:04.790
<v S1>Okay. Yeah, that makes sense. Um. Anything new coming out soon? Any, uh,

0:23:04.790 --> 0:23:06.550
<v S1>new functionality you're excited about?

0:23:06.630 --> 0:23:09.070
<v S2>Uh, yeah. One of the things we'll be, uh, unveiling

0:23:09.070 --> 0:23:12.550
<v S2>pretty soon is, uh, really more connective tissue across, you know,

0:23:12.550 --> 0:23:14.949
<v S2>and continuing to evolve the threat, uh, and detection and

0:23:14.950 --> 0:23:18.510
<v S2>response capabilities across the attack life cycle. So, um, as

0:23:18.550 --> 0:23:21.189
<v S2>we're building out and maturing the product, we're focusing really

0:23:21.190 --> 0:23:23.670
<v S2>on being able to connect the dots, you know, with

0:23:23.710 --> 0:23:26.990
<v S2>even higher fidelity, more types of, um, use cases. So

0:23:27.030 --> 0:23:31.150
<v S2>from broader DLP to inbound email threats, um, being able

0:23:31.150 --> 0:23:33.189
<v S2>to really say, hey, this really does look like a

0:23:33.190 --> 0:23:36.030
<v S2>problem and we're going to help you remediate it. So

0:23:36.310 --> 0:23:39.510
<v S2>you're not just adding tickets to a queue, but helping, um,

0:23:39.510 --> 0:23:41.389
<v S2>you know, really remediate for folks is something that we're

0:23:41.390 --> 0:23:42.630
<v S2>going to be spending a lot of time on.

0:23:43.510 --> 0:23:48.280
<v S1>Oh, nice. Remediation. So what will that flow look like? Like,

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:51.639
<v S1>how are you tying deeper into the remediation flow?

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:54.120
<v S2>Yeah. So that will include things like, um, you know,

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:58.800
<v S2>individual slack notifications or out-of-band notifications for, for end users

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:02.520
<v S2>at an organization or things. Um, you know, beyond just

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:04.760
<v S2>revoking access, but being able to start to pull in

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:09.879
<v S2>things like integrations with your IDP and starting to disable, um,

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:12.600
<v S2>access not only within the workspace but beyond it. So

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:15.960
<v S2>knowing that there has been some compromise of the identity. Um,

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:17.960
<v S2>and we're seeing a firsthand account of somebody trying to

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:19.879
<v S2>get across it, being able to validate that, you know,

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:21.720
<v S2>if your IDP doesn't know about it yet, we will

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:23.399
<v S2>help enable the remediation there.

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:27.680
<v S1>Okay. Yeah, I'm really excited about that. So it's basically

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:31.040
<v S1>getting additional context from other places in the organization to

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:32.680
<v S1>be able to do the stuff you're already doing.

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:35.560
<v S2>Yeah. Yeah, because context is everything when it comes to security, right.

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:37.679
<v S2>Of being able to know not only what's weird and

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:39.639
<v S2>what's not weird, but like when you should go do

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:42.600
<v S2>something and when pausing for a moment might be the

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.320
<v S2>right call. Um, you know, I've worked, you know, with

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:48.170
<v S2>security teams where they've really been trying to be not

0:24:48.170 --> 0:24:51.369
<v S2>only good colleagues, but champions for their security organization and

0:24:51.369 --> 0:24:55.130
<v S2>getting that buy in. And one misstep in a response

0:24:55.130 --> 0:24:57.970
<v S2>action where you have, you know, either the wrong call

0:24:57.970 --> 0:25:00.170
<v S2>or at the wrong time. Um, you know, that really

0:25:00.170 --> 0:25:02.210
<v S2>sets the security team back. So we're trying to partner

0:25:02.210 --> 0:25:05.850
<v S2>with them to make sure that they're rightsizing the remediation,

0:25:05.890 --> 0:25:08.690
<v S2>you know, automatically with as much context as possible.

0:25:09.850 --> 0:25:13.810
<v S1>Nice. Well, awesome. Where can we, uh, learn more about

0:25:13.850 --> 0:25:15.090
<v S1>the the products?

0:25:15.130 --> 0:25:17.930
<v S2>Yeah. You can find us at Materials Security. Um, you'll

0:25:17.930 --> 0:25:20.290
<v S2>see everything that we have to offer there across the

0:25:20.330 --> 0:25:21.689
<v S2>protection for the whole workspace.

0:25:23.090 --> 0:25:25.369
<v S1>Sounds good. Hey, David, are you there?

0:25:29.410 --> 0:25:30.410
<v S3>Yeah. Can you hear me?

0:25:30.890 --> 0:25:34.609
<v S1>Yeah, yeah. Any modules? Um. Any other, um, pieces of

0:25:34.609 --> 0:25:36.530
<v S1>functionality we should, uh, ask about?

0:25:37.170 --> 0:25:39.330
<v S3>No, I don't think so. I think that pretty much

0:25:39.330 --> 0:25:42.010
<v S3>touches on, like, the basic stuff. I mean, we do have, like.

0:25:42.010 --> 0:25:44.290
<v S3>Like I mentioned, the cloud workspace, like, in general, that's

0:25:44.290 --> 0:25:49.030
<v S3>our general vision, um, that we're kind of releasing in a, uh,

0:25:49.230 --> 0:25:52.990
<v S3>I guess two days. Um, so I think he kind

0:25:53.030 --> 0:25:55.750
<v S3>of touched upon it. It's not really necessarily a new release.

0:25:55.790 --> 0:25:58.670
<v S3>Quote unquote. A lot of, like, our real releases have

0:25:58.670 --> 0:26:00.550
<v S3>already happened. So this is just more of like an

0:26:00.550 --> 0:26:03.949
<v S3>announcement kind of stuff that brings it all together, all

0:26:03.990 --> 0:26:07.310
<v S3>these elements. So I don't think there's anything on our

0:26:07.310 --> 0:26:10.190
<v S3>end from a feature perspective that has not been called out,

0:26:10.190 --> 0:26:11.189
<v S3>that should be called out.

0:26:11.910 --> 0:26:17.630
<v S1>Okay. Sounds good. All right, Patrick, I enjoyed the conversation

0:26:17.630 --> 0:26:18.629
<v S1>and thanks for the time.

0:26:18.670 --> 0:26:19.830
<v S2>Yeah, thanks for having me.

0:26:20.390 --> 0:26:21.189
<v S1>All right. Take care.

0:26:21.230 --> 0:26:21.590
<v S2>Bye.

0:26:23.190 --> 0:26:27.150
<v S1>Unsupervised learning is produced on Hindenburg Pro using an Sm7

0:26:27.190 --> 0:26:30.830
<v S1>B microphone. A video version of the podcast is available

0:26:30.830 --> 0:26:34.429
<v S1>on the Unsupervised Learning YouTube channel, and the text version

0:26:34.430 --> 0:26:38.390
<v S1>with full links and notes is available at Daniel Comm

0:26:38.550 --> 0:26:41.189
<v S1>Slash newsletter. We'll see you next time.