S1: All right. Welcome to unsupervised learning. This is Daniel. All right.
S1: So I found the best coffee recipe basically in existence.
S1: And a whole bunch of baristas are super freaking out
S1: about this. So excited. And this is the guy I
S1: think he's invented, like, a whole bunch of really popular recipes.
S1: And I think he's kind of famous for the Hario
S1: switch as well. But anyway, he's got a new recipe
S1: that is just unbelievable. And I have tried it three
S1: times so far, and it's worked perfectly all three times,
S1: and I've not even executed it properly, except for maybe once.
S1: And that time was even better. But I was having
S1: problems with like inconsistent, like coffee quality, which I think
S1: is a in terms of the cup, not the coffee
S1: going in. He basically says that this can make any
S1: being taste amazing and I honestly believe him. It is really,
S1: really that good. So I highly recommend you check this
S1: thing out. I'll tell you really quickly what it is.
S1: It's basically a combination of pour over and, uh, immersion. Okay.
S1: So basically what you do is you do like a
S1: 32nd steep with the hario switch closed. Then you do
S1: a pour over where it actually goes through for a
S1: certain amount of time. And he has the recipe, of course, um,
S1: goes through a for a certain amount of time, then
S1: you close it again. So he's made multiple iterations of
S1: this thing to make it even better and better. So
S1: you close it again, then you pour water in and
S1: this time you pour colder water, you actually add some
S1: cold to it. So you start off at like 90 degrees.
S1: This is Celsius, by the way. And then I forget
S1: what you go down to, but I just added a
S1: little bit of colder water and then you do your
S1: second immersion steep for X amount of time, which is
S1: in the recipe with that colder temperature to avoid extracting
S1: too much harshness. And then, uh, yeah, now you've got
S1: essentially three different phases, and then you mix it all up,
S1: you let it sit for a little bit, and it
S1: is unbelievably good. So it's essentially very round, very fruity,
S1: lots of body. It's just it's the best coffee I've
S1: been making. Um, now he has mentioned that he's really
S1: good with the Aeropress and I just got the metal Aeropress.
S1: The new one. Uh, so it's metal and glass. I
S1: haven't tried that. That used to be my favorite. So.
S1: But I've learned a lot about coffee since then, so
S1: we'll see how this compares to that. I do know
S1: one thing. The Aeropress takes longer, so I'm more likely
S1: to use this hario switch version anyway. But if you
S1: are into coffee, you must check this out. All right.
S1: This guy is super funny. I'm not going to click
S1: on there. There's too much content. This guy is just
S1: absolutely hilarious. He does these skits making fun of computer people. Um,
S1: obviously he is one, so no harm there. Been grinding
S1: on my predictions page. This is what it looks like now.
S1: And this is essentially where I'm putting like all my
S1: different predictions about different things. And I've got a long
S1: way to go on this thing, but I've got quite
S1: a few added And, uh, I've got a table here.
S1: So the table is going to maintain like, uh, the different.
S1: Just a collection of them, right. And this is going
S1: to actually be fairly long, probably, I don't know, 10
S1: or 20. I'm probably going to keep up here at
S1: a given time. Who knows, maybe even more. And then
S1: down below I have more detail about the particular one.
S1: And this is all sort of in the vein of
S1: this book, Super Forecasting, which is just a brilliant way
S1: to think about like acting within a world that's uncertain.
S1: So really excited about working on that project. Got a
S1: fabric call out. Really appreciate. All right. Security. New study
S1: shows AI powered spearfishing is extremely effective. Finding AI tools
S1: achieves 54% click through rate versus 12% for regular phishing emails,
S1: and matched human expert performance at 1/30 of the cost 1/30.
S1: And I was like, well, you don't know about the methodology.
S1: You don't know how good it was. So first I
S1: ran some fabric patterns against the study itself, and it
S1: came back and said it was a good methodology. Then
S1: I found out it was basically Bruce Schneier was part
S1: of this and it's out of Harvard. So I think
S1: it's a pretty good finding. US launched a new cyber
S1: security label program called US Cyber Trustmark to help people
S1: know which smart home devices are secure. There's a series
S1: of books called Project Russia Reveals. Edit there's a series
S1: of books called Project Russia that essentially outlines what Putin
S1: is trying to do. So taking down Western democracies, spiritual warfare,
S1: Economic collapse. And this came out in 2005, 2010. So
S1: maybe it's been updated since then. Maybe he's different, maybe
S1: he's better, maybe he's worse. But, uh, I wanted to
S1: get my hands on all of these. And what I
S1: really want to do is write some fabric patterns that basically. Okay,
S1: if you want to know what like the FSB is
S1: trying to do, just, okay, you know, their campaigns are
S1: going to orient the world if they're effective towards the
S1: direction they want to go, right? So watch this, find
S1: out the direction that they want to go, which turns
S1: out is written down in these books. Then if you
S1: want to know if someone is being influenced by them,
S1: there's not a guarantee, by the way. It's not a guarantee.
S1: There could be overlap that's sort of accidental or circumstantial,
S1: but in general, if they're doing a good job, then
S1: all you have to do is look for spokespeople who
S1: are talking the exact book of what they're what they're
S1: trying to do, which is like spiritual warfare, economic collapse.
S1: Destroying Western democracies. And I'm like, yeah, find people who
S1: are speaking that exact book. Like, for example, Tucker Carlson
S1: Taiwan says Chinese ship might have deliberately cut one of
S1: their undersea internet cables. I wonder if this could be
S1: like the start of a fragmented internet. So, like the
S1: Axis and allies have their own internet and they kind
S1: of nobody can rely on the undersea cables anymore. I've
S1: always wondered about undersea cables. It's it's like been a
S1: thing for me. I have this thing where I wonder
S1: why people don't go to overpasses and throw giant rocks
S1: off of them into cars that are moving 80mph. And
S1: I'm like, there are thousands of these things all over
S1: the place. If somebody wanted to do that, they could. Um,
S1: and there's just so many opportunities for like, why aren't
S1: these things happening? And the answer is that there's some
S1: sort of barrier that stops people from doing bad things.
S1: There is a very strong barrier. Otherwise it would be
S1: mass pandemonium all over the place. But another one of
S1: those examples, similar to the, uh, the overpass thing, is. Okay,
S1: we have these giant undersea cables, and the the ocean
S1: is essentially outer space. Like, there's just you can't possibly
S1: patrol all of it. So why wouldn't somebody who wanted
S1: to disrupt billions of dollars of Western commerce? Why wouldn't
S1: they just go out and cut these cables? And I
S1: was thinking about this years and years ago, and I
S1: was like, there's no way these cables are going to
S1: be safe. Like, they're just there. Like, it's. They're easy
S1: to find. Maybe not easy to get to. And, like,
S1: if it's deep enough. Maybe not easy to get to.
S1: But there are probably places where it is at it.
S1: There are probably places where it is easy enough to
S1: get to. Right. And sure enough, we're seeing this happen
S1: all over the place. We're seeing Finland's complaining about it.
S1: We've got Estonia complaining about it. We've got Taiwan complaining
S1: about it. So yeah. Anyway, it could be that we
S1: are more connected via satellite, which is a tiny, tiny
S1: fraction of the bandwidth that would be over an undersea cable.
S1: But I don't know, maybe we have a more isolated
S1: internet in the future. CISOs released data on how well
S1: like 7800 critical infrastructure orgs were adopting their security goals.
S1: It looks like healthcare care and water systems and communication
S1: and government facilities are doing the best. Got a Chinese
S1: drone company, DJI has released an update. They released an
S1: update that removes its geo fencing so it's able to
S1: fly next to restricted areas like the white House or airline. Uh, airlines? Airports. Like,
S1: how could they possibly. I don't get this. How could
S1: they possibly do this and not immediately face, like, threats
S1: of being banned? Are they just not worried about it?
S1: Is the story wrong? Like something doesn't seem right here.
S1: Arctic Wolf found a likely zero day being used to
S1: hack Fortinet firewalls. New zero day and Avantis VPN products.
S1: I don't know who's running Avanti VPN, but you should
S1: probably stop. Sonicwall is rushing to get customers to patch
S1: a serious authentication bypass bug in their SSL VPN. Greenland
S1: is becoming increasingly critical for US military strategy in the Arctic,
S1: because Russia already has 50 Arctic bases there. And if
S1: you talk to anyone in Finland, that is a new
S1: hotspot up there because Russia's up there as well. White
S1: House and some intelligence agencies are now saying there's a
S1: 5050 chance that a foreign actor did target U.S. personnel.
S1: It's actually reminds me of Covid a lot, where it's
S1: like common sense says, yeah, it was an energy weapon.
S1: Common sense says, yeah, it came out of the Wuhan lab.
S1: And then the the experts come out who I think
S1: want to be careful and basically politically correct. And they're like, yeah,
S1: no connection whatsoever to the Wuhan Covid lab. And no,
S1: Russians are definitely not shooting energy beams at our, you know, diplomats.
S1: Definitely not. And here we are years later, after the
S1: fad of ignoring obvious things has sort of passed. Now
S1: people are now saying obvious things. They're like, hey, maybe
S1: it was actually Russians shooting energy weapons. Hey, maybe it
S1: was actually the Wuhan lab. I in tech, Apple's actually
S1: building the AI that we want. This is this is crazy.
S1: This is going to go on the predictions page, by
S1: the way. I actually need to write that down. I'm
S1: going to forget it. But. What have we been wanting
S1: from Siri all this time? For the last ten years
S1: we've been wanting Siri to like, just understand things, be
S1: able to do things for us. And it hasn't gotten there.
S1: It's actually behind most of most of the other eyes,
S1: in fact, so much so that a lot of brands
S1: have solidified on Google and Alexa and not on Siri,
S1: because it just wasn't that good. And it kind of
S1: still isn't. But I'm telling you, I am staying on
S1: all the betas. Um, I've always installed the betas, like
S1: the day they get released. But look at this update
S1: for beta for 18.4. Look at number two. Like a
S1: real life assistant, you'll be able to reference texts you received,
S1: past calendar events, and more personal data to get truly
S1: intelligent assistance from Siri. So everyone is saying, okay, where
S1: is Apple? Apple is being is being left behind by
S1: all this AI stuff. You know they're not competing. They're
S1: going too slow or whatever. And I've been saying the
S1: whole time, and I did work there for a few
S1: years by the way. Um, but this is not coming
S1: from that. This is coming from the fact that I've
S1: been a religious fanboy since 2007, and I kind of
S1: have been watching how they work since like 2010. So
S1: I study them very closely. And then, of course, I
S1: also work there, but I'm not giving any insider information whatsoever.
S1: But the way they work, okay. And this is not insider,
S1: this is just my analysis. And a lot of people
S1: already agree with this. The way they work is they
S1: think about the distant future. Okay. I've been saying for
S1: a long time they are building life os they have
S1: been for a long time education, health, you know, fitness, um,
S1: you know, work life, personal art, creativity. They're they have
S1: been doing slow pieces, iterative pieces in all these different areas,
S1: and now they're pulling them together and they're unifying them.
S1: Then they build their cloud. First of all, they have
S1: Secure Enclave. So they have the secure local system of
S1: any anyone out there okay. Their hardware is just the best.
S1: Then they just built that secure cloud infrastructure, which is
S1: essentially the same as a secure enclave, but it's in
S1: the cloud. So things that have to go to the
S1: cloud for AI operations that they can't do locally, they
S1: can they could do that in the cloud now. Okay.
S1: So they build all this infrastructure. That was a year
S1: and a half ago. And now they're finally starting to
S1: pull it together. New app actions. Apple says Siri will
S1: be able to perform hundreds of new actions in Apple apps,
S1: without the need to even open those apps. App intents
S1: will bring the same capability to supported third party apps
S1: as well. And what's this? Siri will know what's on
S1: your display, so you can easily ask it to take
S1: action on whatever you're looking at. I'm telling you right now,
S1: this is what Apple often does. Now, they didn't do
S1: it with Siri until now, and I would have bet
S1: against that and I would have been wrong. In fact,
S1: I need to put that on my predictions. Wrong about Siri.
S1: Sorry for taking note. I just don't want to miss it.
S1: That was one. If you had told me ten years ago,
S1: would we be at a place ten years from now
S1: where Siri has been behind the market for five years?
S1: I would have bet good money against that and I
S1: would have been wrong. I think this is what undoes it.
S1: I'm not often wrong about Apple stuff, by the way.
S1: I'm like Point 9%, right? But I would have been
S1: wrong about that one. And I think this is what
S1: finally undoes it now. It's going to be hard. It's
S1: going to be difficult. There's going to be problems. But
S1: I feel like they're finally, finally getting it. I hope
S1: they are all right. Open A's zero one keeps randomly
S1: switching languages while solving problems and nobody knows why. So
S1: it sometimes switches to Chinese, Persian, and other languages right
S1: in the middle of reasoning. Even when the question was
S1: asked in English. You know what I hope this is?
S1: I don't know what this is. I haven't looked into
S1: it yet. But you know what I hope it is?
S1: I hope certain types of problems lend themselves better to
S1: certain languages. Right? We know that certain languages are like analytical,
S1: like German or something. Then you have like, I don't know,
S1: is it romantic or love based or, I don't know,
S1: maybe there are certain types of analysis. Maybe math. Maybe
S1: math is better in Persian. I don't know, maybe math
S1: is better in Chinese. I have no idea, but that
S1: would be a cool reason if that turned out to
S1: be the reason. I don't know that it is. Zuckerberg
S1: says meta will start using AI to replace mid-level software
S1: engineers in 2025. He says they'll have AI systems that
S1: can effectively work as company engineers writing code, eventually planning
S1: to automate all app development at meta. Yes, this reminds
S1: me of what Benioff was talking about for Salesforce and
S1: Agent Force. He's also selling models. They're open source models,
S1: but ultimately Zuckerberg is also selling AI. Um, I have
S1: to think about this a this a little more, but.
S1: And it's definitely less the case than Benioff, who is
S1: really selling trying to sell Agent Force. But I partially
S1: believe Zuckerberg here. But I also think he's also just
S1: trying to hype up the company and get people to
S1: buy more stock. So hard to know how much of
S1: a balance there is, but I think both are probably true.
S1: In video released a blueprint for creating digital twins of
S1: robot fleets in factories and warehouses. Virtual environments where companies
S1: can test and optimize their robots. Robots are going crazy.
S1: I think I have a comment down here, but robots
S1: are going crazy right now. OpenAI released their new economic
S1: blueprint that outlines how the US can win the AI
S1: race against China. OpenAI is starting to build its own
S1: robotics team, hiring for hiring first for its hardware roles,
S1: and Dell is changing their laptop names just to Dell,
S1: Dell Pro and Del Pro Max, which is copying Apple
S1: on multiple different things. So first it was the form. Uh,
S1: the form factor of phones. Everybody copies. Everyone's phone looks
S1: like an iPhone now. All all packaging now looks like
S1: Apple packaging. And now everything's a pro and a Pro Max. Like,
S1: buy anything on Amazon. And like, half of it has those, uh,
S1: product lines now. And Apple might launch a new app
S1: called invites. Hopefully better than like, things like Calendly, although
S1: I think Calendly is pretty good, but it just seems
S1: like there should be a more professional way to handle that.
S1: I don't know why nobody has yet. Stack overflow is
S1: seeing a massive decline in new questions, dropping 77% Since 2022.
S1: Anything crazy happened in 2022? Not sure. Not sure what
S1: that could have been. Amazon is winding down some of
S1: its Dei programs and integrating others into existing processes. Meta
S1: killed off most of their programs and their entire Dei department.
S1: My analysis here is that the corporate world continues to
S1: move towards the Alaskan fishing boat model. There is no
S1: die on an Alaskan fishing boat, and if robots could
S1: do the work, there wouldn't be any cruise. There wouldn't
S1: be any people on Alaskan fishing boats either. Expect this
S1: to accelerate in the next four years, because essentially the
S1: whole concept of Dei. Um. Yeah, the whole concept of
S1: Dei kind of lost big time on November 5th. Humans
S1: might have just made huge changes to their content policies,
S1: including allowing hate speech against many different groups. I think
S1: my opinion on this might be different. A lot of
S1: people around this area. I actually want platforms to display
S1: full reality, including, uh, really nasty speech and stuff that
S1: I do not want to see. I simply want the
S1: ability to filter it out. I want to be able
S1: to take that stuff and block it and say, I
S1: don't want hostility, I don't want sexism, I don't want racism.
S1: I don't want conversations about this. I want to block, uh,
S1: politicians with, you know, that rhyme with frump? Like, I
S1: want to have that control, but I don't want the
S1: Form to make those decisions for me. I want to
S1: see reality. If I want to. And this is especially
S1: the case if I want to do like pure research
S1: on like how often how much is racism or sexism
S1: going up or down in certain communities? Well, you can't
S1: do that if the platform itself is blocking it. Um,
S1: so this is all part of a discussion, and I
S1: got a piece here about this, but, um, it's all
S1: about a discussion of like, okay, what actually is a platform, right?
S1: Is it a public thing or is it a private thing?
S1: And that's really what we have to ask ourselves. Economy
S1: added 256,000 jobs in 2024. Unemployment. Unemployment rate at it.
S1: The unemployment rate dropped to 4.1%. What if they counted
S1: the people who are now looking for jobs, though? it'd
S1: be like 41%. I'm exaggerating. Slightly rare seven planet alignment
S1: is coming to Earth's night skies in February 2025. I
S1: tell you what, these planets are already out. I think
S1: I mentioned this last week. You've got to go see
S1: these things. Like right now, like Mars is like straight
S1: above me. And Jupiter is moving off the axis towards
S1: the west a little bit, which makes sense. Oh, and also,
S1: you know what's really cool? Do you know why the
S1: planets are always kind of like right in the middle?
S1: And they move left to right through the sky. It's
S1: because that is the axis of the plane of all
S1: the planets. And we rotate in line with that axis,
S1: that or that plane that all the planets are rotating on.
S1: So the flatness of the plane of all the different
S1: planets is the same axis that we rotate on. We're
S1: at a slight angle, but that's why as we're turning,
S1: this would be more the case. Um, at the equator. But.
S1: We're oh, and they're going towards the west, which means
S1: we're turning counterclockwise from the north. I was going to
S1: ask I about that a second ago. In fact, I'm
S1: going to do it right now. Are we moving? Counter clockwise.
S1: This is probably a stupid question. I haven't spatially figured
S1: this out. I don't know why I'm doing this live.
S1: Are we moving counterclockwise relative to the. It depends on
S1: if you're top or bottom, right. Like Australia versus Canada.
S1: Are we moving counterclockwise relative to the. Oh, no. What
S1: I want to know is, are we moving counterclockwise? Are
S1: we moving opposite? Are we rotating? Opposite. To the. Direction
S1: we are. There is no actual opposite. Okay, so if
S1: we're going this. If all the planets are going. Top
S1: and bottom. This is so stupid. If all the planets
S1: are going clockwise, the question is, is the planet? Is
S1: Earth turning with that direction or against that direction, and
S1: I guess the inside would be against the outside would
S1: be with. Are we rotating opposite to the direction that
S1: we are orbiting sun or. In line with it. And
S1: watch this tab. Enter or no. Alt. Enter. Counterclockwise on
S1: its axis when viewed from above the North pole. And
S1: orbits the sun in the same counterclockwise direction. Okay, so that's.
S1: That's how it's thinking. Top down from the North Pole.
S1: I should have thought of that. Top down from the
S1: North Pole. Counterclockwise on its axis, and it's going around
S1: the sun in the same counterclockwise. Okay. Interesting. All right. Sorry.
S1: Sorry to bother you guys. All right. We'll cut that out.
S1: We'll use I. Whatever. All right. Germans are using do
S1: it yourself balcony solar panels to cut their electricity bills.
S1: Young people are increasingly avoiding relationships, and it's happening all
S1: over the world. Japan's already low marriage rate dropped another 12%
S1: since 2019. A third of 18 to 34 year olds
S1: globally say they're just not interested in dating or relationships.
S1: I don't know what kind of problem that's going to be,
S1: but it's going to be a problem. In 1965, the
S1: US government tried replacing Mexican farm workers with the American
S1: high school, with American high school athletes. And this is
S1: this is back when like, Americans were super hard working. Right?
S1: And it failed spectacularly. 18,000 teenagers, only 3300 worked in
S1: the fields, but they quit within weeks. My dad actually
S1: talked about this. He talked about he went out for, like,
S1: one day. And this would have been, uh, this would
S1: have been in the 60s. Yeah, it would have been
S1: in the 60s or the 70s. Yeah, 60s or 70s.
S1: So right about this time, he went out and, uh,
S1: worked in the field for like, one day, and, or
S1: maybe it was like a week and just, like, quit
S1: too hard. Yeah. Fafo f around and find out. That's
S1: what we're going to do. If if we if we, uh,
S1: kick out, like, all these workers, like the country will
S1: just stop and they'll be like, nah, just kidding, you
S1: can come back. My thoughts on Zuckerberg and Musk showing
S1: us raw internet. Basically, I want that. But with the
S1: ability to tune out what I don't want to see.
S1: This is what we just talked about. All right. Discovery.
S1: This little snippet. I do this all the time GP
S1: and then text. I don't even have to use quotes,
S1: just GP and then text to, um, get commit with
S1: that text. And yeah, this is a cool little call
S1: to action on tweet. New Nvidia free courses for AI.
S1: A researcher scanned the entire IPv4 internet on port 80
S1: using mass scan and then analyze the results with nmap. Yeah,
S1: this one was cool. See if I can pull it up.
S1: Look at that. 42 million IP addresses on port 80
S1: discovered buckets. Digital ocean spaces. Like lots of different data here.
S1: Pretty cool project. I can't optimize your way to being
S1: a good person. Your obsession with moral optimization and quantifying
S1: ethical behavior might be making us worse people. Yeah. Julia
S1: Evans explains what's needed for a modern terminal experience. This
S1: is a really good write up by Julia. You got
S1: to check this out also. I'm digging the typography. Mad
S1: respect for the website. Uh, using fish terminal emulator neovim.
S1: There you go. There you go. Neovim base 16 framework. Hmm.
S1: Not familiar. Some out of the box options. Anyway, she's
S1: got a full, in-depth thing. Quite good, quite good. Philips
S1: Hue users. Uh, I am one of them. We'll be
S1: able to create custom scenes using voice or text commands
S1: like give me a scene for a garden party, and
S1: it'll either use the garden party scene or it'll just
S1: go make one that it thinks is appropriate, which I
S1: think is super cool. Recommendation of the week. Don't clutter
S1: your mind with anything before you start work. Treat your
S1: morning clarity as a precious resource. You want the energy
S1: to go into difficult work, not distraction fragmentation. So the
S1: way I think about this is like you start off
S1: with like 100 energy points. When you wake up in
S1: the morning, let's assume you had a perfect night of
S1: sleep and you had exercise before, and you're just like,
S1: you feel really good. So you wake up, you're at 100.
S1: Or worst case scenario, you didn't sleep perfectly. You're out
S1: of 90. Let's say you're top shape for whatever it is.
S1: What I've noticed, and this is um, Karpathy was talking
S1: about this as well. And actually, I think I originally
S1: heard this maybe a couple years back from Alex Hormozi. Um,
S1: and it really rung true for me, and I've been
S1: thinking about it since, um, basically, if you get into
S1: email or especially if you get into social media, those
S1: things will consume your energy and it's really, really bad.
S1: The worst possible thing that I can do is I
S1: don't get up and get out of bed. I wake up,
S1: I reach for my phone, I look at my phone
S1: and I start clicking through emails, and I start clicking
S1: through social media. And then I check the news. So
S1: what happens is my brain starts going crazy with news,
S1: crazy with social media, crazy with emails. And then it
S1: starts essentially doing work. My brain starts, it spins up
S1: a bunch of like avatars, and it just starts going
S1: and working and working and working. I still haven't got
S1: up yet. My brain is getting tired. And this is
S1: like the worst possible thing you could do because you
S1: are extremely creative with that 100 creativity and energy points.
S1: Extremely creative. You just cleaned your brain. You just cleansed
S1: your whole brain for the night by sleeping. That's what
S1: sleep does. You wake up refreshed. Your brain is like,
S1: let's do something cool. Let's do something cool. And instead
S1: of doing something cool, instead of getting into really hard, difficult,
S1: creative work, you waste it. You wasted on news or
S1: social media or something like that. So don't do that.
S1: Don't waste those points on trash. What does Karpathy say here? Uh, well,
S1: what he said earlier is he wake up and go
S1: directly to work. Do not check anything. No messages, no email,
S1: no news, no nothing. There's something destructive, distracting about checking
S1: the outside world that I don't fully understand. I think
S1: I just explained it. I think what I just described
S1: is the explanation for it, roughly. And the aphorism of
S1: the week. I can bear any pain as long as it.
S2: Is.
S1: At it. And the aphorism of the week I can
S1: bear any pain as long as it has meaning. I
S1: can bear any pain as long as it has meaning.
S1: Haruki Murakami.