WEBVTT - UL NO. 437: My List of Hard-won Life Lessons

0:00:00.140 --> 0:00:02.779
<v S1>Are you prepared for whatever shitstorm may hit your desk

0:00:02.779 --> 0:00:05.540
<v S1>during the workday? Auto Max has your back. Check out

0:00:05.540 --> 0:00:08.870
<v S1>the brand new autonomous IT podcast. Listen in as various

0:00:08.869 --> 0:00:12.740
<v S1>IT experts discuss the latest Patch Tuesday releases, mitigation tips,

0:00:12.740 --> 0:00:16.310
<v S1>and custom automations to help with CVE remediations make new

0:00:16.310 --> 0:00:20.810
<v S1>work friends. Listen now to the autonomous IT podcast on Spotify, Apple,

0:00:20.810 --> 0:00:25.340
<v S1>or wherever you tune in to podcasts. Welcome to Unsupervised Learning,

0:00:25.340 --> 0:00:28.340
<v S1>a security, AI, and meaning focused podcast that looks at

0:00:28.340 --> 0:00:31.340
<v S1>how best to thrive as humans in a post AI world.

0:00:31.940 --> 0:00:35.930
<v S1>It combines original ideas, analysis, and mental models to bring

0:00:35.930 --> 0:00:38.479
<v S1>not just the news, but why it matters and how

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:48.810
<v S1>to respond. All right. Episode 437. What are we doing here? Okay,

0:00:48.810 --> 0:00:54.480
<v S1>so I'm delivering my augmented AI course again live. And

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:58.640
<v S1>this is on July 26th. It's actually my birthday. And

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:02.930
<v S1>so that'll be next month. And the theme is moving

0:01:02.930 --> 0:01:06.170
<v S1>towards human 3.0. How to survive and thrive in the

0:01:06.170 --> 0:01:11.670
<v S1>world full of AI. And yeah, I got human 3.0 conversation,

0:01:11.670 --> 0:01:15.000
<v S1>skill sets and mental frames, integrating AI into your life

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:18.990
<v S1>and work and a whole bunch of resources. Essentially, it's

0:01:18.990 --> 0:01:21.090
<v S1>going to be a lot of hands on, actually showing

0:01:21.090 --> 0:01:24.780
<v S1>you the way that I use AI and adding a

0:01:24.780 --> 0:01:29.459
<v S1>whole new section above and beyond the previous class, which

0:01:29.459 --> 0:01:32.460
<v S1>talks about how to basically get ready, what things do

0:01:32.459 --> 0:01:34.710
<v S1>you actually have to learn. And a big part of

0:01:34.709 --> 0:01:36.959
<v S1>this is so that you could tell the other people

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:39.900
<v S1>that you care about, especially young people like people in

0:01:39.900 --> 0:01:42.660
<v S1>high school, people in about to go into college, people

0:01:42.660 --> 0:01:46.650
<v S1>in college, or people changing careers who just have massive

0:01:46.650 --> 0:01:49.620
<v S1>anxiety from all this AI stuff. This is basically going

0:01:49.620 --> 0:01:53.580
<v S1>to give my outline of what I think is coming

0:01:53.580 --> 0:01:55.890
<v S1>and how to get ready for it, like how to

0:01:55.890 --> 0:01:59.520
<v S1>not just survive it, but actually be antifragile so that

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:04.260
<v S1>you actually benefit from it. So that is next month,

0:02:04.260 --> 0:02:07.200
<v S1>the end of July. My friend Monica is launching her

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:12.060
<v S1>cybersecurity leadership Masterclass. Goes over tons of stuff, which I

0:02:12.060 --> 0:02:14.940
<v S1>talk about here, and it's just a really good course.

0:02:14.940 --> 0:02:17.610
<v S1>I think she really has a good perspective on this,

0:02:17.610 --> 0:02:19.020
<v S1>and I got a link here to sign up for

0:02:19.020 --> 0:02:24.240
<v S1>the class doing a webinar with Elastic Security. And that's

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:28.410
<v S1>coming up Tuesday, June 25th. And I changed some headers.

0:02:28.410 --> 0:02:31.560
<v S1>Doesn't really matter. All right. My work. So few new

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:34.560
<v S1>essays this week. So the first one is talking about

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:38.820
<v S1>ratings and basically how I believe AI is going to

0:02:38.820 --> 0:02:43.260
<v S1>basically do like this. This 123 punch one is teaching

0:02:43.260 --> 0:02:47.940
<v S1>us things. Second is testing us to see how well

0:02:47.940 --> 0:02:50.400
<v S1>we know that material. And the third one is giving

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:53.820
<v S1>these scores. And, uh, I think it's going to be

0:02:53.820 --> 0:02:56.489
<v S1>really crazy. You should you should check out the whole post.

0:02:56.490 --> 0:02:59.250
<v S1>This is the post here. And I basically talk about

0:02:59.250 --> 0:03:02.760
<v S1>like the different scores. I talk about, like ways and

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:06.090
<v S1>components of the score that are going to be pretty crazy.

0:03:06.090 --> 0:03:10.649
<v S1>And it starts to get a little bit scary, quite,

0:03:10.650 --> 0:03:13.890
<v S1>quite a bit scary actually. Okay. Imagine you're walking around,

0:03:13.889 --> 0:03:17.010
<v S1>you have like the score above your head because because

0:03:17.010 --> 0:03:18.600
<v S1>it's not just going to be for a test that

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:20.640
<v S1>you took or whatever, right? It's also going to be

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:24.000
<v S1>for like, hey, instead of me having to vet every

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:26.850
<v S1>single person that I want to date or a college

0:03:26.850 --> 0:03:29.880
<v S1>having to vet incoming people, why don't they just send

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:33.960
<v S1>you to do this Astra test, whatever that is? And

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.240
<v S1>this is some random company, a made up company, right?

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:38.520
<v S1>But they're going to get your blood work and they're

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:42.540
<v S1>going to do all of this, your personal life history there.

0:03:42.540 --> 0:03:45.660
<v S1>And keep in mind this is an AI avatar asking

0:03:45.660 --> 0:03:49.170
<v S1>you these things. There's a camera on you watching your

0:03:49.170 --> 0:03:52.380
<v S1>facial expressions and your body language. And keep in mind,

0:03:52.380 --> 0:03:55.290
<v S1>this is like GPT six or GPT seven or whatever.

0:03:55.290 --> 0:03:58.350
<v S1>So it's like extremely advanced AI. So it could read

0:03:58.350 --> 0:04:00.510
<v S1>your body language. It knows when you're lying, it knows

0:04:00.510 --> 0:04:03.450
<v S1>when you're uncomfortable about a thing, but it's going to

0:04:03.450 --> 0:04:05.790
<v S1>ask you about your traumas. It's going to ask you

0:04:05.790 --> 0:04:09.420
<v S1>about your like, your beliefs about different things. It's going

0:04:09.420 --> 0:04:11.940
<v S1>to ask you about morality. It's also going to test

0:04:11.940 --> 0:04:15.240
<v S1>your technical skills, ask you to actually build things. It's

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:18.660
<v S1>going to deep dive into your opinions on like tons

0:04:18.660 --> 0:04:20.910
<v S1>of different things. It's going to look at your base

0:04:20.910 --> 0:04:25.740
<v S1>core knowledge, math, physics, biology, history, economics, all these other disciplines.

0:04:25.740 --> 0:04:29.220
<v S1>It's basically going to understand like how smart you are,

0:04:29.250 --> 0:04:33.420
<v S1>all the different stuff that you know, your maturity across

0:04:33.420 --> 0:04:37.770
<v S1>lots of different areas like emotional maturity, your wisdom, things

0:04:37.770 --> 0:04:41.520
<v S1>like that. And then it's going to ask about your finances.

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:43.469
<v S1>It's going to ask about like how much money do

0:04:43.470 --> 0:04:45.900
<v S1>you make? What is your earning potential, why do you

0:04:45.900 --> 0:04:47.970
<v S1>think you can make that much money, blah, blah, blah.

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.880
<v S1>All of that combined think of like a three day

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.760
<v S1>test where eight hours a day, you're talking to this

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.789
<v S1>AI avatar, and the whole time you're on camera and

0:04:56.790 --> 0:04:58.890
<v S1>a lot of people are thinking, why would anyone sign

0:04:58.890 --> 0:05:01.890
<v S1>up for that? The answer is because they want to

0:05:01.890 --> 0:05:05.370
<v S1>know that about themselves. They also have some measure of

0:05:05.370 --> 0:05:07.800
<v S1>trust that the videos aren't going to go out, but

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:11.010
<v S1>that which isn't going to happen. Those companies are absolute

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:14.070
<v S1>going to get hacked. Right? So that's that's a mess.

0:05:14.070 --> 0:05:16.350
<v S1>But it doesn't it doesn't matter. Everyone's going to get

0:05:16.350 --> 0:05:18.690
<v S1>hacked in this way. So it kind of just like

0:05:18.690 --> 0:05:21.990
<v S1>that doesn't matter. So you have the videos, the AI

0:05:21.990 --> 0:05:25.230
<v S1>does the analysis. And keep in mind, the AI knows

0:05:25.230 --> 0:05:29.700
<v S1>everything about human psychology. It knows all the subject matter

0:05:29.700 --> 0:05:34.320
<v S1>that you're talking about history, physics, you know, security, like

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.050
<v S1>all the different things that you're good at. It knows

0:05:37.050 --> 0:05:39.330
<v S1>how good you are at it based on the fact

0:05:39.330 --> 0:05:42.030
<v S1>that it did the the interview with you. So it's

0:05:42.029 --> 0:05:44.700
<v S1>like taking you into deep water to see how deep

0:05:44.700 --> 0:05:48.900
<v S1>you can go. Right? Well, now, now think of companies

0:05:48.900 --> 0:05:51.570
<v S1>who want to hire somebody. They don't have to do

0:05:51.570 --> 0:05:55.740
<v S1>all this deep vetting, deep vetting, a three day set

0:05:55.740 --> 0:05:58.529
<v S1>of interviews, or a two week set of interviews with

0:05:58.529 --> 0:06:01.739
<v S1>like five different groups of people. And they're asking like

0:06:01.740 --> 0:06:05.550
<v S1>dumbass questions. That does not work. You see how bad

0:06:05.550 --> 0:06:09.310
<v S1>people can be even after they go through the interview process. Okay.

0:06:09.310 --> 0:06:12.760
<v S1>In current hiring methods, there's like a gauntlet of all

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:17.230
<v S1>these interviews. That gauntlet of interviews does not yield great

0:06:17.230 --> 0:06:21.039
<v S1>people a high percentage of the time. It does sometimes,

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:25.180
<v S1>but not nearly as much as it actually should, given

0:06:25.180 --> 0:06:28.659
<v S1>like how extensive that is. Now compare that with somebody

0:06:28.660 --> 0:06:32.409
<v S1>who's like, hey, look, if you have an astro score,

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:34.270
<v S1>I would love for you to share it. You don't

0:06:34.270 --> 0:06:36.729
<v S1>have to. We're not going to ask you to do it.

0:06:36.730 --> 0:06:43.029
<v S1>But of course, hiring managers, companies assuming it's legal, that's

0:06:43.029 --> 0:06:44.560
<v S1>going to be a problem. There's going to be some

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:47.140
<v S1>regulation against stuff like this, because it's going to be

0:06:47.140 --> 0:06:51.190
<v S1>so good that it's going to instantly put great people way,

0:06:51.220 --> 0:06:54.940
<v S1>way above. And because it's so good and it's because

0:06:54.940 --> 0:06:58.960
<v S1>it's so merit meritocratic, there's going to be massive pushback.

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:02.620
<v S1>But I think that it's going to be so useful

0:07:02.620 --> 0:07:06.040
<v S1>and so powerful for startups that they're going to do

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:11.050
<v S1>it anyway, especially this especially matters in a world of AI,

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:14.770
<v S1>because people are going to have much smaller teams. It's

0:07:14.770 --> 0:07:17.320
<v S1>going to be like me, the founder, and I need

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:21.130
<v S1>a total, total badass to be like my chief of

0:07:21.130 --> 0:07:24.910
<v S1>staff because they're going to run my 13 different companies,

0:07:24.910 --> 0:07:27.880
<v S1>which are mostly AI powered. But I need a total

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.520
<v S1>killer to be that person, which means I need a

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:35.740
<v S1>high astro score specifically in like fluid intelligence, raw IQ,

0:07:35.740 --> 0:07:40.390
<v S1>communication skills, like all these particular things. And what's crazy

0:07:40.390 --> 0:07:44.200
<v S1>is I can describe in an interview to AI exactly

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:46.690
<v S1>what I need, exactly what my product does. In fact,

0:07:46.690 --> 0:07:48.970
<v S1>the AI will just go get all that stuff. It

0:07:48.970 --> 0:07:51.400
<v S1>will then understand that perfectly. Then it will look at

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:56.440
<v S1>someone's astro score and just basically find matches and be like, look,

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.860
<v S1>this person is pre-vetted. Their astro score perfectly matches I

0:07:59.860 --> 0:08:04.030
<v S1>validated the Astro score is real, which Astro will also do.

0:08:04.030 --> 0:08:05.890
<v S1>And by the way, Astro, this is a made up company.

0:08:05.890 --> 0:08:10.030
<v S1>It's not real, but there will be many Astros. So

0:08:10.030 --> 0:08:13.240
<v S1>now it's like hey, do you want to talk to them? Yeah, sure.

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:15.880
<v S1>So you get on a call with them and you're like, hey. Yeah.

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:19.480
<v S1>So I mean, the AI says that you're really good.

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:24.070
<v S1>My my da, my da. My personal digital assistant says,

0:08:24.070 --> 0:08:27.460
<v S1>you seem to be really good on paper, which means

0:08:27.460 --> 0:08:30.280
<v S1>through all this AI vetting. So you have a conversation

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:33.460
<v S1>and what do you know? You start talking about books.

0:08:33.460 --> 0:08:36.760
<v S1>You start talking about what? The way you see the future,

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:39.460
<v S1>you start talking about ambition. And they're like, oh yeah,

0:08:39.460 --> 0:08:43.569
<v S1>I'm reading those same books. I'm listening to those same podcasts. Yeah,

0:08:43.570 --> 0:08:45.760
<v S1>I just worked out this morning and you're like, Holy crap,

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:50.080
<v S1>this person's just like me. Total badass. Yeah. Perfect match.

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:53.290
<v S1>What do you know? What are the odds? Quite good, actually.

0:08:53.290 --> 0:08:56.500
<v S1>Quite good because of the Astro score. So now think

0:08:56.500 --> 0:09:02.199
<v S1>of companies can just rely on the score. What about dating? Dating? Well,

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:04.900
<v S1>look at all these questionnaires people are filling out and

0:09:04.900 --> 0:09:07.600
<v S1>they're not happy with the dates. And Astro score is

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:10.000
<v S1>going to be a way better measure of a person

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:13.750
<v S1>than this. And of course, there's going to be nasty

0:09:13.750 --> 0:09:16.959
<v S1>gross astro scores. Keep in mind it's going to be like, oh,

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:21.339
<v S1>how pretty is this, this person, how rich is this person?

0:09:21.340 --> 0:09:24.579
<v S1>And they're going to have like whatever, an Omni score

0:09:24.580 --> 0:09:29.320
<v S1>and it's going to be like Douchebaggery score essentially. So

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:32.770
<v S1>you shouldn't think that just because it's AI generated that

0:09:32.770 --> 0:09:36.250
<v S1>it's a good measure of a person. That's not true.

0:09:36.250 --> 0:09:39.370
<v S1>What I'm talking about is something that's really deep across

0:09:39.370 --> 0:09:42.850
<v S1>multiple facets of a person, where it actually is kind

0:09:42.850 --> 0:09:47.230
<v S1>of capturing how good they are and how valuable they are,

0:09:47.230 --> 0:09:51.670
<v S1>and importantly, how useful they are for a particular application,

0:09:51.670 --> 0:09:55.450
<v S1>such as working inside this company, working on your particular problems,

0:09:55.450 --> 0:09:57.910
<v S1>or if you're trying to build a family and you

0:09:57.910 --> 0:09:59.980
<v S1>want to know, like how good of a dad is

0:09:59.980 --> 0:10:01.689
<v S1>this person going to be? How good of a mom

0:10:01.690 --> 0:10:04.960
<v S1>is this person going to be? Well, now it's focusing

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:08.230
<v S1>on those areas which were covered in the interview. The

0:10:08.230 --> 0:10:14.290
<v S1>point is, many, many things in society require and desire

0:10:14.650 --> 0:10:18.699
<v S1>to vet. This is universal vetting. That's what this is.

0:10:18.700 --> 0:10:22.300
<v S1>This is universal vetting. You need to vet people to

0:10:22.300 --> 0:10:24.670
<v S1>work on a company with you, to do a project

0:10:24.670 --> 0:10:27.670
<v S1>with you, to be a babysitter for you, to be

0:10:27.670 --> 0:10:31.030
<v S1>a dog sitter, for you to be a life partner. Right.

0:10:31.030 --> 0:10:34.840
<v S1>So these types of scores, the better they are. Let's

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.120
<v S1>say this Astro one is the best one. It's like

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:41.979
<v S1>a seven day on site, in person talk with all

0:10:41.980 --> 0:10:45.250
<v S1>these different eyes, and they're hitting you from different angles.

0:10:45.370 --> 0:10:48.490
<v S1>They're watching you do jumping jacks. I mean, it's going

0:10:48.490 --> 0:10:50.319
<v S1>to be crazy. Oh, by the way, you submitted a

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:53.920
<v S1>blood sample. Right now it's looking at your genome. Yeah, yeah.

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:56.770
<v S1>And that's why when I came up with the name,

0:10:56.770 --> 0:11:01.719
<v S1>I used AI for that Astra. I forget what it means, but. Yeah. Uh,

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:05.920
<v S1>what's that movie with Ethan Hawke? What's the one where, like,

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:09.630
<v S1>the guy wasn't chosen to go on the. Flight anyway.

0:11:09.630 --> 0:11:14.580
<v S1>It's dystopian. Okay, 100%. All this stuff is dystopian. All

0:11:14.580 --> 0:11:19.020
<v S1>this awesome stuff is simultaneously dystopian. The question is, can

0:11:19.020 --> 0:11:22.260
<v S1>we take it in good directions? Right. That's the only question.

0:11:22.260 --> 0:11:24.810
<v S1>We know it's going to go in bad directions. That's

0:11:24.809 --> 0:11:27.570
<v S1>a guarantee. I mean, have you seen humanity? Of course

0:11:27.570 --> 0:11:30.060
<v S1>it's going to go in bad directions. The question is,

0:11:30.059 --> 0:11:32.819
<v S1>can we limit some of those? Can we control some

0:11:32.820 --> 0:11:36.719
<v S1>of those? Can we discourage some of those and steer

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:41.130
<v S1>them in positive like human 3.0 directions. Like ideally you

0:11:41.130 --> 0:11:44.160
<v S1>would have something like an astro score that's super deep.

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:47.850
<v S1>It's super knowledgeable, but it's not like man, not as

0:11:47.850 --> 0:11:51.780
<v S1>attractive man. Oh, there could be a flaw here. We

0:11:51.780 --> 0:11:55.440
<v S1>don't talk to flawed people. A real astro score is

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:57.959
<v S1>going to be like, hey, this person is nuanced and

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:02.040
<v S1>this person has, you know, warts. And this person is like,

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:06.240
<v S1>flawed and and complex and multiple layers and blah, blah, blah.

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.300
<v S1>But I think at the core level, you guys could

0:12:09.300 --> 0:12:12.990
<v S1>be soulmates. And here's the list of questions to like

0:12:12.990 --> 0:12:17.250
<v S1>initiate that initial discovery period or whatever. It's not about perfection.

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:19.559
<v S1>Not in the human based world, not in the human

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:22.260
<v S1>3.0 based world. It's not based on perfection. It's based

0:12:22.260 --> 0:12:28.960
<v S1>on deep matches. On the things that matter. And spending

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:35.260
<v S1>less time or getting confused by surface level things. He's

0:12:35.260 --> 0:12:38.590
<v S1>very attractive. He's very rich. But you find out three

0:12:38.590 --> 0:12:42.550
<v S1>years later, you know, he's in your mind. He's garbage, right?

0:12:42.550 --> 0:12:47.350
<v S1>Because he doesn't treat you well like he treats people poorly. Right.

0:12:47.350 --> 0:12:50.080
<v S1>And the whole thing that he postured with you was

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.000
<v S1>all an act, and you just wasted three years of

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:54.040
<v S1>your life, and you were supposed to be having kids

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:56.800
<v S1>by now. So, like, there's a positive way to go

0:12:56.800 --> 0:13:00.819
<v S1>with this. And I think we need to realize, one,

0:13:00.820 --> 0:13:05.630
<v S1>that there are positive opportunities to. Bad things are going

0:13:05.630 --> 0:13:08.750
<v S1>to happen from these types of scores and not be

0:13:08.750 --> 0:13:12.290
<v S1>confused in thinking that because bad things happen, mean the

0:13:12.290 --> 0:13:14.750
<v S1>whole thing is a wash. First of all, doesn't matter

0:13:14.750 --> 0:13:16.790
<v S1>if it's a wash because it's going to happen anyway.

0:13:16.970 --> 0:13:20.449
<v S1>So either way you should be prepared. So lots of

0:13:20.450 --> 0:13:23.569
<v S1>different ways to get value from this type of analysis.

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:27.620
<v S1>And here we are. We're we're like 15 20 minutes

0:13:27.620 --> 0:13:32.030
<v S1>in or whatever ten 15 minutes in. And uh that

0:13:32.030 --> 0:13:36.559
<v S1>was one essay okay. Next one the fast slow problem.

0:13:36.860 --> 0:13:38.540
<v S1>You know what? This one's short enough. I'm going to

0:13:38.540 --> 0:13:43.130
<v S1>go ahead and perform this one because that was called performing. Okay.

0:13:43.130 --> 0:13:46.370
<v S1>So I've been obsessed lately with the concept of slow

0:13:46.370 --> 0:13:50.750
<v S1>versus fast. I'm calling it the fast. Slow problem refers

0:13:50.750 --> 0:13:53.660
<v S1>to the speed and amount of dopamine that you get

0:13:53.660 --> 0:13:56.330
<v S1>from a thing. So in the distant past, an apple

0:13:56.330 --> 0:13:59.000
<v S1>would have been a treat, and especially an apple pie

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:02.180
<v S1>because it took so long to prepare and enhance those

0:14:02.210 --> 0:14:05.630
<v S1>apples which were by themselves not easy to come by.

0:14:05.630 --> 0:14:09.830
<v S1>That's slow from the difficulty of finding the thing, and

0:14:09.830 --> 0:14:13.160
<v S1>from the long process of creating an apple pie. A

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:17.240
<v S1>box of donuts, on the other hand, is fast. First

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:19.490
<v S1>of all, you could just walk in and say, give

0:14:19.490 --> 0:14:22.820
<v S1>me a dozen donuts. And second of all, a donut

0:14:22.820 --> 0:14:27.230
<v S1>has been engineered to taste better than a hundred crates

0:14:27.230 --> 0:14:29.990
<v S1>of apples. So if you eat like six donuts, one

0:14:29.990 --> 0:14:32.840
<v S1>after another and then you bite into an apple, it

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:37.190
<v S1>tastes like a 3D piece of like printed styrofoam. Like

0:14:37.190 --> 0:14:39.680
<v S1>it just does not compare to a donut. And there's

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:42.200
<v S1>lots of other examples of this, like porn being the

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:46.370
<v S1>fast extracted version of sex, TikTok being the fast extracted

0:14:46.370 --> 0:14:49.910
<v S1>version of reading a book or watching a movie. And

0:14:49.910 --> 0:14:54.200
<v S1>I worry that this is what's happening with human relationships,

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:57.109
<v S1>like dating. They say that young people don't want to

0:14:57.110 --> 0:15:00.170
<v S1>get into relationships or have sex with each other anymore,

0:15:00.170 --> 0:15:03.170
<v S1>and evidently it's because they would rather do other things.

0:15:03.170 --> 0:15:07.040
<v S1>And this feels very much like a fast, slow problem.

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:11.450
<v S1>What if this is as simple as teenagers and young

0:15:11.450 --> 0:15:14.660
<v S1>adults having more fast options on their phones and TVs,

0:15:14.660 --> 0:15:17.450
<v S1>and they are so good that the slow options of

0:15:17.450 --> 0:15:22.610
<v S1>companionship and relationships simply cannot compete. It's one thing when

0:15:22.610 --> 0:15:25.940
<v S1>a donut competes with an apple, but in this case,

0:15:25.940 --> 0:15:29.300
<v S1>the fast versus slow problem might actually be affecting the

0:15:29.300 --> 0:15:32.270
<v S1>future of the species. I'm not sure what the complete

0:15:32.270 --> 0:15:34.910
<v S1>answer is here, because I'm sure there are places where

0:15:34.940 --> 0:15:39.080
<v S1>fast versions are simply better, and not just faster. But

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:40.880
<v S1>what I do know is that I think we should

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:45.230
<v S1>start being very cautious about replacing slow versions of things

0:15:45.260 --> 0:15:50.360
<v S1>with the fast versions of things. There is meaning in

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:55.280
<v S1>doing things slowly. Slow walks while holding hands. Reading physical

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:59.960
<v S1>books in natural light and making apple pies from scratch.

0:15:59.960 --> 0:16:02.420
<v S1>I think we should do our best to figure out

0:16:02.420 --> 0:16:06.050
<v S1>what those slow, meaningful things are and ensure that we

0:16:06.050 --> 0:16:09.410
<v S1>keep as many of them in our lives as possible.

0:16:09.410 --> 0:16:13.280
<v S1>That was that one. All right list of hard won

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:15.890
<v S1>life lessons. I think I'm going to do a separate

0:16:15.890 --> 0:16:20.720
<v S1>one for this, but essentially it's a list of pretty

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:25.130
<v S1>decent wisdom here. Yeah, I'll give you one. In practice,

0:16:25.130 --> 0:16:29.900
<v S1>weak people behave very similarly to evil people. Don't tie

0:16:29.900 --> 0:16:33.050
<v S1>yourself to either. So that's the vibe there. It's a

0:16:33.050 --> 0:16:35.450
<v S1>whole bunch of those. So I do want to move

0:16:35.450 --> 0:16:37.490
<v S1>to a model where I support a lot more of

0:16:37.490 --> 0:16:42.050
<v S1>my work with memberships, courses and revenue from apps that

0:16:42.050 --> 0:16:45.860
<v S1>I'm building. So I would love for you all to

0:16:45.860 --> 0:16:49.790
<v S1>actually subscribe and become members of UL. So you just

0:16:49.790 --> 0:16:54.800
<v S1>go to Daniel meister.com/upgrade and you can become a member.

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.830
<v S1>And there's just so many benefits. The biggest one is

0:16:57.830 --> 0:17:01.130
<v S1>the actual community, which it's just the most amazing people

0:17:01.130 --> 0:17:03.830
<v S1>that I've ever met. It's uh it's great. We got

0:17:03.830 --> 0:17:08.480
<v S1>a book club, monthly meetups, significant discounts. So I that

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.450
<v S1>augmented course that's going to be $200 off if you

0:17:11.450 --> 0:17:13.909
<v S1>become a member. And guess what? Becoming a member is

0:17:13.910 --> 0:17:16.940
<v S1>only 100 bucks a year. So you kind of like

0:17:16.940 --> 0:17:19.550
<v S1>make up for it instantly. And there's just a whole

0:17:19.550 --> 0:17:22.159
<v S1>bunch of other stuff. We actually have physical meetups. It's

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:26.210
<v S1>pretty cool. All right. Stories House just passed a bill

0:17:26.210 --> 0:17:32.270
<v S1>that bans DJI drones from using FCC frequencies. Disgruntled ex-employee

0:17:32.270 --> 0:17:37.669
<v S1>costs over $600,000 by deleting 180 test servers. Using a

0:17:37.670 --> 0:17:40.520
<v S1>script that he found on Google, Wells Fargo fired over

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:45.859
<v S1>a dozen employees for faking keyboard activity to look busy. Yeah,

0:17:46.460 --> 0:17:50.510
<v S1>AWS has added Fido Passkeys for MFA, and root users

0:17:50.510 --> 0:17:54.409
<v S1>must enable this by July of 2024. I love this,

0:17:54.410 --> 0:17:59.179
<v S1>I don't think there's anything better recently for security than passkeys.

0:17:59.180 --> 0:18:02.390
<v S1>Like maybe the like the last ten years. Like it's

0:18:02.390 --> 0:18:05.270
<v S1>just really good. New York Times source code was stolen

0:18:05.270 --> 0:18:09.199
<v S1>using an exposed GitHub token like this is an older story.

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:12.500
<v S1>Maybe it happened again. iOS 18 will let you automatically

0:18:12.500 --> 0:18:16.040
<v S1>record and transcribe phone calls through the phone app. I

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:19.070
<v S1>have the beta. I need to get that going. Thanks

0:18:19.070 --> 0:18:23.810
<v S1>to a project discovery for sponsoring, Canada is proposing potentially

0:18:23.810 --> 0:18:28.370
<v S1>life in prison for hate speech, and maybe even preemptively

0:18:28.369 --> 0:18:32.150
<v S1>restrict their freedom based on anticipated crimes. Based on what

0:18:32.150 --> 0:18:35.060
<v S1>I saw happen to Jordan Peterson, who I'm not a

0:18:35.060 --> 0:18:39.290
<v S1>complete fan of, by the way, especially lately. But what

0:18:39.290 --> 0:18:42.590
<v S1>I saw that Canada did to him, not a huge

0:18:42.590 --> 0:18:47.600
<v S1>fan linked out. LinkedIn is rolling out AI career coaches. Yeah,

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:50.000
<v S1>see my essay above on the Astro scores. That's what

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:54.500
<v S1>we just talked about. AI and LMS are transforming cyber insurance. Yeah,

0:18:54.500 --> 0:18:56.450
<v S1>I really needed to do a whole piece on this.

0:18:56.450 --> 0:19:00.950
<v S1>But real time risk adjustments and pricing adjustments based on

0:19:00.950 --> 0:19:05.720
<v S1>that risk I plus insurance. Yeah that's spicy. It's going

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:07.610
<v S1>to be good. And when I say good I mean

0:19:07.609 --> 0:19:10.850
<v S1>good for insurance companies. Scale came out with a controversial

0:19:10.850 --> 0:19:14.990
<v S1>stance that they will hire on merit and merit alone.

0:19:14.990 --> 0:19:19.310
<v S1>This thing is worth reading. Okay, skip that one. Tesla

0:19:19.310 --> 0:19:24.740
<v S1>shareholders have backed Elon Musk's $56 billion pay package. Got

0:19:24.740 --> 0:19:27.980
<v S1>two things here where I left the subtitle in there

0:19:27.980 --> 0:19:31.980
<v S1>do not like. Okay. Yeah. So they basically approved $56

0:19:31.980 --> 0:19:36.080
<v S1>billion pay package. This feels very Atlas Shrugged to me.

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.920
<v S1>Basically give the actual builders anything they want because there's

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:42.740
<v S1>so few of them left and they're so special. I

0:19:42.740 --> 0:19:46.939
<v S1>really like how it's like pro entrepreneur, but I feel

0:19:46.940 --> 0:19:50.180
<v S1>like it comes with a lot of toxicity. Like give

0:19:50.210 --> 0:19:53.990
<v S1>Buck Reinhold a harem because Buck deserves it and there's

0:19:53.990 --> 0:19:57.050
<v S1>cheering in the background. I think we need like a

0:19:57.050 --> 0:20:03.889
<v S1>healthy hybrid, right where we have this massive respect for founders, builders, creators, entrepreneurs.

0:20:03.890 --> 0:20:08.359
<v S1>But we build in the assumption that, look, it's not

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:12.469
<v S1>just the 1%, they're not special people. Why isn't everyone

0:20:12.470 --> 0:20:15.830
<v S1>doing that? And that's what that's what human 3.0 is,

0:20:15.859 --> 0:20:19.730
<v S1>is getting everyone into this category. So guess what? There's

0:20:19.730 --> 0:20:22.969
<v S1>no more God complexes because everyone's supposed to be that way. Yeah,

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:27.020
<v S1>great timing for this one. Evidently, Musk has had sexual

0:20:27.020 --> 0:20:32.119
<v S1>relationships with multiple SpaceX employees, including a former intern, which

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.790
<v S1>he hired on to his executive team. And this is

0:20:34.790 --> 0:20:38.840
<v S1>according to Wall Street Journal. Now, yeah, I got complex

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:43.280
<v S1>thoughts on this. I think radical honesty and like voicing

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.310
<v S1>your desire to be with somebody, all of that is like,

0:20:46.310 --> 0:20:49.450
<v S1>I think Musk is actually doing that better than. Most people.

0:20:49.450 --> 0:20:53.409
<v S1>The problem is he works with these people. Right. So

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:57.280
<v S1>I've got a fake example here. Julie, great work on

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:01.240
<v S1>the Montague project I admire you. You should have my babies.

0:21:03.310 --> 0:21:05.020
<v S1>And keep in mind, this is not a real quote,

0:21:05.020 --> 0:21:08.770
<v S1>but this is kind of the vibe, right? This would

0:21:08.770 --> 0:21:12.699
<v S1>be wrong if nothing happened from it. Because even if

0:21:12.700 --> 0:21:15.250
<v S1>that worked out, if that conversation worked out, her career

0:21:15.250 --> 0:21:18.760
<v S1>was great. His career was great. Like no problems. It

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:21.460
<v S1>would still be wrong because it has so many chances

0:21:21.460 --> 0:21:25.180
<v S1>of going wrong. And this is why this is not allowed,

0:21:25.420 --> 0:21:28.540
<v S1>because the the allegation here, which nobody knows if this

0:21:28.540 --> 0:21:31.030
<v S1>is true, but the allegation is that, uh, some of

0:21:31.030 --> 0:21:35.350
<v S1>the women supposedly said that they were given this offer,

0:21:35.350 --> 0:21:38.530
<v S1>they declined, and then they got screwed because of it. Right?

0:21:38.530 --> 0:21:41.500
<v S1>They didn't get the promotion, they got fired. Whatever. Whatever

0:21:41.500 --> 0:21:44.530
<v S1>the case was that's being alleged. All right. California has

0:21:44.530 --> 0:21:47.590
<v S1>the biggest wage gap in the US. This seems to

0:21:47.590 --> 0:21:50.650
<v S1>make sense to me. It's like it's the most extreme

0:21:50.650 --> 0:21:52.300
<v S1>version of a big city. So you're going to have

0:21:52.300 --> 0:21:55.209
<v S1>higher highs and lower lows. So that makes sense. We

0:21:55.210 --> 0:21:59.200
<v S1>just broke ground on America's first next gen nuclear facility.

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:01.930
<v S1>And this is a piece by Bill gates. Uh, really

0:22:01.930 --> 0:22:04.660
<v S1>cool to see him working on energy the way he is.

0:22:04.660 --> 0:22:09.910
<v S1>Russia replaced the dollar and the euro with the Chinese currency,

0:22:09.910 --> 0:22:14.200
<v S1>the yuan yuan, yuan, something like that. There's a fungus

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:18.429
<v S1>that can eat plastic. I'm worried. What else it can eat?

0:22:18.430 --> 0:22:20.290
<v S1>That's just me. Apple left out a lot of the

0:22:20.290 --> 0:22:26.230
<v S1>small updates in, uh, WWDC keynote, so. Oh, I already

0:22:26.230 --> 0:22:30.669
<v S1>used this. So I speak Spanish pretty well, and I

0:22:30.700 --> 0:22:34.540
<v S1>type in Spanish a lot, and it's not auto correcting me.

0:22:34.540 --> 0:22:38.409
<v S1>It's letting me type in Spanish mixed with English. Absolutely

0:22:38.410 --> 0:22:41.800
<v S1>love it. So that must be already turned on. Flashlight

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:47.000
<v S1>app has new animations. Widgets are easier to resize. The

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:51.260
<v S1>Vision Pro shows your keyboard in VR, and Mac OS

0:22:51.470 --> 0:22:56.330
<v S1>has some new nostalgic wallpapers. Apple Vision Pro lets you

0:22:56.330 --> 0:22:59.270
<v S1>watch House of the Dragon, which is the new Game

0:22:59.270 --> 0:23:04.940
<v S1>of Thrones thing, in an updated, immersive Iron Throne room environment.

0:23:05.270 --> 0:23:09.740
<v S1>Spatial personas envision two I just updated mine and recorded

0:23:09.740 --> 0:23:13.010
<v S1>a new persona. Someone wants a FaceTime? Let me know.

0:23:13.010 --> 0:23:15.649
<v S1>And got an argument here that Jupyter notebooks are the

0:23:15.650 --> 0:23:19.430
<v S1>fast food of coding. Convenient but often unhealthy for long

0:23:19.430 --> 0:23:24.440
<v S1>term projects. And Jensen Huang told Caltech grads to pursue

0:23:24.470 --> 0:23:27.919
<v S1>$0 billion markets, which are markets with no current value

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:30.859
<v S1>but huge future potential. And I just figured out what

0:23:30.859 --> 0:23:33.650
<v S1>I love so much about Jensen. He's like a permanently

0:23:33.650 --> 0:23:37.129
<v S1>nice version of Elon and we've all seen Elon be nice.

0:23:37.130 --> 0:23:40.940
<v S1>I actually love Elon. I think he's amazing when I

0:23:40.940 --> 0:23:44.869
<v S1>see him talk about space or the future or saving humanity.

0:23:44.869 --> 0:23:47.960
<v S1>I'm like this guy is literally my hero. Then I

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:51.260
<v S1>see him posting memes on Twitter about politics and I'm like.

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:56.440
<v S1>Do not be this person. Do not let people make

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:59.560
<v S1>you into this person. And I get very angry at him.

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:02.290
<v S1>So it's great to see that you can have like

0:24:02.290 --> 0:24:07.970
<v S1>an Elan type, like an Atlas shrug type. Who's also nice.

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:12.290
<v S1>It's amazing. Got someone predicting that generative AI will actually

0:24:12.290 --> 0:24:15.320
<v S1>increase the demand for software engineers over the next 20 years,

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:18.890
<v S1>not decrease it. I think there's some validity to that.

0:24:18.890 --> 0:24:21.560
<v S1>I think we'll also decrease it, but also increase. The

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:25.220
<v S1>question is which one wins out? I think probably increase

0:24:25.220 --> 0:24:28.129
<v S1>wins out in the beginning, widely held view that sperm

0:24:28.130 --> 0:24:30.170
<v S1>counts and men are dropping around the world may be

0:24:30.170 --> 0:24:34.730
<v S1>wrong in according to a new study and University of Manchester.

0:24:34.730 --> 0:24:37.430
<v S1>So I tend to go by the quality of these

0:24:37.430 --> 0:24:41.840
<v S1>things to determine if I include it or not. And

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:43.610
<v S1>if I really want to look, I run it through

0:24:43.609 --> 0:24:47.750
<v S1>fabric and see like how it scores the paper. Curiosity

0:24:47.750 --> 0:24:52.700
<v S1>Yeah argues that perfectionism is about optimizing at the wrong scale.

0:24:52.850 --> 0:24:55.939
<v S1>I love that, I love that statement. I love the sentence.

0:24:55.940 --> 0:25:00.260
<v S1>Perfection is about optimizing at the wrong scale. This reminds

0:25:00.260 --> 0:25:03.229
<v S1>me of another thing that I really love. The worst

0:25:03.230 --> 0:25:06.170
<v S1>way to lose is to win at the wrong game.

0:25:06.500 --> 0:25:11.100
<v S1>And that's what this reminds me of. Perfectionism. Perfectionism is

0:25:11.100 --> 0:25:14.670
<v S1>optimizing at the wrong scale. Love it. 38% of web

0:25:14.670 --> 0:25:20.379
<v S1>pages that existed in 2013 are no longer accessible. Derek

0:25:20.380 --> 0:25:23.950
<v S1>Sivers explains why you should create a now page. I've

0:25:23.950 --> 0:25:26.409
<v S1>been doing this for a long time. I don't currently

0:25:26.410 --> 0:25:28.810
<v S1>have one up. That's because I'm going to have it

0:25:28.810 --> 0:25:32.080
<v S1>in my personal API soon, which will be all AI powered.

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:35.770
<v S1>Basically a Da going to be cool stuff that's going

0:25:35.770 --> 0:25:37.810
<v S1>to take a little bit longer. I'm not actively working

0:25:37.810 --> 0:25:40.600
<v S1>on it yet. Waiting for the tech to evolve a

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:44.470
<v S1>few more months. Okay, ideas. Increased production of goods and

0:25:44.470 --> 0:25:48.609
<v S1>services after AI, and how does that make sense if 90%

0:25:48.609 --> 0:25:50.950
<v S1>of people don't have money to buy the stuff? So

0:25:50.950 --> 0:25:54.040
<v S1>I'm talking about the economics there. Got someone arguing that

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:56.290
<v S1>in a world dominated by AI and robots, the key

0:25:56.290 --> 0:26:00.250
<v S1>to human survival isn't being smarter, but being more mediocre.

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:06.610
<v S1>I included it just because I like alternative views. Pop cultures, oligopoly,

0:26:06.609 --> 0:26:10.119
<v S1>dream machine, AI model. Yeah, lumen labs, this thing's blowing up.

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:15.369
<v S1>Nvidia Warp Infinite content ideas generator can now design and

0:26:15.369 --> 0:26:20.740
<v S1>manufacture your own chips. LM Mojo Olama new version enhanced

0:26:20.770 --> 0:26:26.440
<v S1>GPU discovery SQLite is likely the most used database engine.

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:29.920
<v S1>Pretty cool argument there. There's a new Starlink coming out,

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:32.560
<v S1>a tiny one that's really good for like camping and

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:36.520
<v S1>RVs and stuff. And, uh, Max lighter has a simple

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:39.609
<v S1>but powerful tip ship something every day. Doesn't have to

0:26:39.609 --> 0:26:42.250
<v S1>be big, just something you can point to. Recommendation of

0:26:42.250 --> 0:26:44.950
<v S1>the week. I recommend you check out my list of

0:26:44.950 --> 0:26:47.590
<v S1>hard won life lessons I was talking about earlier. The

0:26:47.590 --> 0:26:50.260
<v S1>full list is pretty good, and the aphorism of the week.

0:26:50.260 --> 0:26:53.020
<v S1>The sad truth is that most evil is done by

0:26:53.020 --> 0:26:55.570
<v S1>people who never make up their minds to be good

0:26:55.570 --> 0:26:59.020
<v S1>or evil. The sad truth is that most evil is

0:26:59.020 --> 0:27:02.020
<v S1>done by people who never make up their minds to

0:27:02.020 --> 0:27:07.129
<v S1>be good or evil. Hannah Arendt. Unsupervised Learning is produced

0:27:07.130 --> 0:27:10.160
<v S1>and edited by Daniel Meisler on a Neumann U87 AI

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:14.450
<v S1>microphone using Hindenburg. Intro and outro music is by zombie

0:27:14.450 --> 0:27:17.420
<v S1>with the why and to get the text and links

0:27:17.420 --> 0:27:19.639
<v S1>from this episode, sign up for the newsletter version of

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:25.200
<v S1>the show at Daniel meisler.com/newsletter. We'll see you next time.