WEBVTT - UL NO. 434: Can You Articulate Yourself in 50 Words?

0:00:01.129 --> 0:00:04.490
<v S1>Welcome to Unsupervised Learning, a security, AI and meaning focused

0:00:04.490 --> 0:00:07.370
<v S1>podcast that looks at how best to thrive as humans

0:00:07.370 --> 0:00:11.570
<v S1>in a post AI world. It combines original ideas, analysis,

0:00:11.570 --> 0:00:14.810
<v S1>and mental models to bring not just the news, but

0:00:14.810 --> 0:00:21.980
<v S1>why it matters and how to respond. All right. Welcome

0:00:21.980 --> 0:00:25.100
<v S1>to unsupervised learning. This is Daniel Meisler. This episode is.

0:00:25.100 --> 0:00:30.710
<v S1>Can you articulate yourself in 50 words? Let's jump in here. Yeah.

0:00:30.710 --> 0:00:33.140
<v S1>One of the most important things for surviving AI is

0:00:33.140 --> 0:00:36.560
<v S1>being able to articulate what you do, or even better,

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:39.290
<v S1>who you are. So I was at a party with

0:00:39.290 --> 0:00:42.410
<v S1>a bunch of like, high net worth people, like muckety

0:00:42.409 --> 0:00:45.290
<v S1>mucks like important people. And somebody asked me, I was

0:00:45.290 --> 0:00:48.290
<v S1>at RSA, so people have asked me this like 20

0:00:48.290 --> 0:00:50.360
<v S1>times over the course of the week. They asked me

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:52.190
<v S1>what I did and I told them I built AI

0:00:52.190 --> 0:00:55.850
<v S1>stuff and they just looked at me like, oh, you're

0:00:55.850 --> 0:00:58.790
<v S1>an asshole. Basically, like I was trying to be cool.

0:00:58.790 --> 0:01:01.430
<v S1>And it's like, I am seriously not trying to be cool.

0:01:01.430 --> 0:01:04.490
<v S1>I'm trying to say a small amount, which maybe spawns

0:01:04.490 --> 0:01:07.399
<v S1>a conversation if they're like, oh yeah, really? What kind

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:09.350
<v S1>of AI or something? But I don't want to go

0:01:09.350 --> 0:01:11.690
<v S1>into some sales pitch of like, oh, I'm building AI

0:01:11.690 --> 0:01:13.760
<v S1>that blah blah, blah blah does this. But it was

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:16.850
<v S1>just like not landing. It didn't land for me. It

0:01:16.850 --> 0:01:19.250
<v S1>didn't land for them. It just wasn't good. So I

0:01:19.250 --> 0:01:22.790
<v S1>think I'm basically going to answer differently from now on.

0:01:22.790 --> 0:01:25.460
<v S1>I'm going to start with the problems. So I'm basically

0:01:25.459 --> 0:01:28.009
<v S1>worried about two problems people having a lack of meaning

0:01:28.010 --> 0:01:32.240
<v S1>in their lives and AI making that worse when their

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:34.700
<v S1>jobs go away. So what I do is I use

0:01:34.700 --> 0:01:37.460
<v S1>AI to build products and services that help people and

0:01:37.459 --> 0:01:41.360
<v S1>companies create a version of themselves that will not just survive,

0:01:41.390 --> 0:01:45.620
<v S1>but will thrive after AI is everywhere. And I could

0:01:45.620 --> 0:01:48.080
<v S1>say that in multiple different ways, but it starts with

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:51.110
<v S1>I'm worried about two problems, so I'm building these things

0:01:51.110 --> 0:01:53.780
<v S1>to solve them. So that's basically like my new spiel.

0:01:53.780 --> 0:01:56.450
<v S1>And I like this for a few different reasons. One,

0:01:56.450 --> 0:01:59.960
<v S1>it starts with the problems. Two, it highlights that I'm building.

0:01:59.960 --> 0:02:03.260
<v S1>It mentions AI, which is good to mention, and it

0:02:03.470 --> 0:02:06.680
<v S1>is actually what I'm doing, and it puts meaning as

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:09.380
<v S1>the most important piece even above AI. So I like

0:02:09.380 --> 0:02:12.080
<v S1>it for all these different reasons. But I think the

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:16.880
<v S1>most screwed people right now are those who don't know themselves, right?

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:19.640
<v S1>They don't know what they're about, they don't have a

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:22.520
<v S1>purpose they can't articulate, like why they get up in

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.130
<v S1>the morning and what they're driving towards, or why they

0:02:25.130 --> 0:02:27.980
<v S1>do the job that they're doing other than, well, I

0:02:27.980 --> 0:02:31.190
<v S1>it's just the job I have or whatever. So my

0:02:31.190 --> 0:02:35.060
<v S1>recommendation know yourself and be able to articulate that thing.

0:02:35.060 --> 0:02:39.890
<v S1>So I ran this through the create five sentence summary

0:02:39.889 --> 0:02:43.130
<v S1>fabric pattern. And it ended up with this helping people

0:02:43.130 --> 0:02:47.600
<v S1>find meaning in the AI era. Empowering human potential with AI,

0:02:47.630 --> 0:02:52.880
<v S1>AI for human flourishing, meaningful AI solutions, and AI powered meaning.

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:56.000
<v S1>Not too bad. So my work network Chuck, my buddy

0:02:56.000 --> 0:03:00.530
<v S1>Chuck here just posted the most amazing video about fabric.

0:03:00.530 --> 0:03:04.640
<v S1>It was just absolutely, insanely good. I've been waiting for

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:06.380
<v S1>this thing to drop for a couple of months now,

0:03:06.380 --> 0:03:11.329
<v S1>and so he basically captures this spirit of the project

0:03:11.330 --> 0:03:15.260
<v S1>in such a fantastic way. He just really gets the

0:03:15.260 --> 0:03:18.080
<v S1>concept of it how it's human. First, he mentions it

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:21.980
<v S1>multiple times, he pulls multiple quotes out. He's got us

0:03:21.980 --> 0:03:25.579
<v S1>talking about it in an interactive way there. It's just

0:03:25.580 --> 0:03:28.400
<v S1>unbelievably good. And it's a pretty long video. And he

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:32.419
<v S1>walks through all sorts of use cases. Highly recommend that one. Security.

0:03:32.419 --> 0:03:34.549
<v S1>Looks like we're going to have a cyber force similar

0:03:34.550 --> 0:03:38.150
<v S1>to the Space Force. Chinese linked hackers are using things

0:03:38.150 --> 0:03:42.020
<v S1>called orbs, which are basically these hop networks that they

0:03:42.020 --> 0:03:44.960
<v S1>can bounce through for hiding, spying, and a bunch of

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:50.420
<v S1>other shenanigans. Fixed problems instead of doing risk measurement theatre.

0:03:50.420 --> 0:03:53.270
<v S1>I came up with that title, but Andy Ellis wrote

0:03:53.270 --> 0:03:58.130
<v S1>this piece. Quite cool. This piece actually. Short. Sweet. Yeah.

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.490
<v S1>Really good. Highly recommend it. Run some AI against it

0:04:01.490 --> 0:04:04.010
<v S1>if you don't want to read that. But yeah, really good.

0:04:04.130 --> 0:04:10.610
<v S1>Got a bug cloud? No, a cloud related bug. Linguistic lumberjack.

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:14.930
<v S1>Pretty cool alliteration there. Issue with Fluentbit. And basically it's

0:04:14.930 --> 0:04:18.590
<v S1>got 3 billion downloads and it's yeah all sorts of systems.

0:04:18.589 --> 0:04:23.120
<v S1>So another supply chain issue American criminal records exposed 70

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:28.580
<v S1>million rows of American criminal record in a database somewhere.

0:04:28.850 --> 0:04:33.740
<v S1>So Russia evidently launched some sort of space weapon capable

0:04:33.740 --> 0:04:36.470
<v S1>of attacking satellites. And they're saying that it's close to

0:04:36.470 --> 0:04:39.830
<v S1>a particular one, same orbit as a US government satellite

0:04:39.830 --> 0:04:42.740
<v S1>posing a direct threat. And of course, Russian said Russia

0:04:42.740 --> 0:04:45.710
<v S1>said fake news. Not true, which I believe. And why

0:04:45.710 --> 0:04:48.500
<v S1>wouldn't you believe him? Like why would they lie? That's

0:04:48.500 --> 0:04:52.820
<v S1>the thing. I breaks into a tech giant. So X-Force

0:04:52.820 --> 0:04:56.300
<v S1>from IBM, they've been around forever. They've been around like

0:04:56.300 --> 0:04:58.729
<v S1>they were around when I got started, I think. And

0:04:58.730 --> 0:05:00.919
<v S1>they got a new AI hacking platform, and they use

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.430
<v S1>it to attack some major tech manufacturers network, and they

0:05:04.430 --> 0:05:07.310
<v S1>got in around eight hours. Question is, how much human

0:05:07.310 --> 0:05:10.460
<v S1>involvement was there or was it like completely automated? That

0:05:10.460 --> 0:05:13.520
<v S1>would be impressive. They haven't released this tool yet, but

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.400
<v S1>eager to hear more about it. Tesla's can still be hacked.

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:20.549
<v S1>I believe these were model threes, but. A buddy, Malwaretech

0:05:20.550 --> 0:05:24.839
<v S1>Marcus Hutchins did a demo of this on his TikTok.

0:05:24.870 --> 0:05:27.599
<v S1>Pretty easy to get into these cars still, even though

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.210
<v S1>they switched to wideband to try to get around this,

0:05:30.210 --> 0:05:33.060
<v S1>I believe. But yeah, it still works. Not sure if

0:05:33.060 --> 0:05:37.050
<v S1>it works on model wise. Preliminary report on the Baltimore

0:05:37.050 --> 0:05:42.540
<v S1>Bridge looks like unexpected structural weaknesses. So not cyber like

0:05:42.540 --> 0:05:46.830
<v S1>so many people said immediately. Core issue with Wi-Fi with

0:05:46.830 --> 0:05:51.090
<v S1>lack of Ssid authentication during beaconing. Okay, got a US

0:05:51.089 --> 0:05:54.060
<v S1>woman and four others charged in a scheme using fake

0:05:54.060 --> 0:05:57.450
<v S1>IT jobs to get lots of money into North Korea's

0:05:57.450 --> 0:06:03.060
<v S1>nuclear program. 60 identities and 300 companies US companies. Insane.

0:06:03.330 --> 0:06:07.050
<v S1>NYPD is rolling out drones to respond to 911 calls.

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:09.660
<v S1>I am happy about this, but only because I like

0:06:09.660 --> 0:06:14.190
<v S1>sci fi technology. You. The EU passed its AI act,

0:06:14.190 --> 0:06:16.650
<v S1>and I've got a summary here. I'm not going to

0:06:16.650 --> 0:06:19.800
<v S1>read all ten of these points, but the fines up

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:22.919
<v S1>to 7% of worldwide turnover, that's a pretty hefty fine.

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:27.870
<v S1>Probably not going to be ignored as much as other regulation. Oh,

0:06:27.870 --> 0:06:30.330
<v S1>the other key point, because I read a whole bunch

0:06:30.330 --> 0:06:34.380
<v S1>of this thing, was that they tried to support innovation,

0:06:34.380 --> 0:06:37.380
<v S1>so they didn't go like crazy Europe on it with

0:06:37.380 --> 0:06:41.310
<v S1>like just more and more regulation. They actually have a

0:06:41.310 --> 0:06:44.700
<v S1>regulation in here that says you can't impose other regulation.

0:06:44.700 --> 0:06:48.000
<v S1>So they wanted to avoid this getting out of control,

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:50.969
<v S1>which I thought was smart of them. And when your

0:06:50.970 --> 0:06:55.050
<v S1>AI sounds too much like Scarlett Johansson. So I have

0:06:55.050 --> 0:06:58.920
<v S1>opinions on this. So basically Sam tweeted out her, okay,

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:01.080
<v S1>so it was pretty obvious that they wanted this thing

0:07:01.110 --> 0:07:03.419
<v S1>to sound like the movie, right? So they reached out

0:07:03.420 --> 0:07:06.690
<v S1>to a voice actress who sounded like Scarlett, and then

0:07:06.690 --> 0:07:10.920
<v S1>they reached out to actual Scarlett Johansson. Real Scarlett Johansson

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:12.630
<v S1>said no. So they're like, okay, we're going to go

0:07:12.630 --> 0:07:14.700
<v S1>with the other one. They already I don't know if

0:07:14.700 --> 0:07:17.070
<v S1>they had tweeted out her before or after that, but

0:07:17.070 --> 0:07:19.920
<v S1>it was obviously they were going in that direction. I

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:22.410
<v S1>don't think this is horribly malicious. Like if you've ever

0:07:22.410 --> 0:07:24.630
<v S1>worked inside of one of these companies, especially at like

0:07:24.630 --> 0:07:28.200
<v S1>the leadership level, there is mass chaos. You might have

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:30.660
<v S1>marketing talking about something. You might have someone on your

0:07:30.660 --> 0:07:34.530
<v S1>leadership team who, like, was approved to say something. But

0:07:34.530 --> 0:07:37.170
<v S1>they said the thing that was different than the actual message.

0:07:37.170 --> 0:07:40.470
<v S1>There could be miscommunication here. So yeah, I don't think

0:07:40.470 --> 0:07:44.100
<v S1>it's malicious, but somebody was bringing up. Look, it's not

0:07:44.100 --> 0:07:48.060
<v S1>Scarlett Johansson. You can hire somebody who sounds like somebody else,

0:07:48.060 --> 0:07:50.280
<v S1>no big deal. And I had a tweet somewhere. It

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:54.090
<v S1>was like, you're not allowed to deepfake people using real humans.

0:07:54.090 --> 0:07:57.540
<v S1>That's still a deepfake. Not technically. It's not technically a

0:07:57.540 --> 0:07:59.880
<v S1>deepfake because it's not AI. It's a real person. But

0:07:59.880 --> 0:08:02.400
<v S1>the point is to copy someone else. And I'm sure

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.400
<v S1>there's precedent for this all over the place. Already on

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.280
<v S1>the books. It's like if I hire somebody who looks

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:13.620
<v S1>exactly like whoever, um, the Rock, Dwayne Johnson or whatever,

0:08:13.620 --> 0:08:17.640
<v S1>and I'm like, yeah, I'm claiming to be him or no,

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:20.550
<v S1>I just call the app the Stone, and it's like

0:08:20.550 --> 0:08:22.710
<v S1>the Rock's voice, but it's like, no, I didn't know

0:08:22.710 --> 0:08:24.690
<v S1>it was the Rock, and I. What are you talking about?

0:08:24.690 --> 0:08:26.550
<v S1>I don't even know who the rock is. But you

0:08:26.550 --> 0:08:28.650
<v S1>hire a person who sounds just like him, and the

0:08:28.650 --> 0:08:31.860
<v S1>app is called the Stone. Then you tweet out, rocks

0:08:31.860 --> 0:08:34.950
<v S1>are cool, that come on, there's got to be a

0:08:34.950 --> 0:08:37.650
<v S1>precedent for that. So they're going to get smashed if

0:08:37.650 --> 0:08:40.800
<v S1>that does go to court. I wish it just wouldn't. Right?

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.890
<v S1>I mean, I'm trying to look at positives here. Like

0:08:43.890 --> 0:08:46.830
<v S1>Sam is trying to do a cool thing. Okay. It's

0:08:46.830 --> 0:08:50.010
<v S1>like her is awesome, I love her. I've got a

0:08:50.010 --> 0:08:53.250
<v S1>video about this where I'm like, hey, look, you could

0:08:53.250 --> 0:08:57.630
<v S1>talk to Samantha from the movie her and I'm breaking down,

0:08:57.630 --> 0:08:59.729
<v S1>like how you can use that with Siri and Shortcuts

0:08:59.730 --> 0:09:03.420
<v S1>and everything. So it's like so obvious and it's so cool.

0:09:03.420 --> 0:09:06.210
<v S1>And it's also cool for Scarlett to be able to say, yeah,

0:09:06.210 --> 0:09:09.809
<v S1>you know what? Not me. Can't do that. So anyway,

0:09:09.809 --> 0:09:12.480
<v S1>it's a legal issue. I'm not sure what the actual

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:16.140
<v S1>precedent says, but yeah, hiring someone who sounds just like

0:09:16.140 --> 0:09:19.949
<v S1>Scarlett and pretending it didn't happen, that's not the game.

0:09:20.130 --> 0:09:23.069
<v S1>Looks like Apple tried to get all of TSMC's two

0:09:23.070 --> 0:09:30.420
<v S1>nanometer chips stock skyrocketing 262%, $26 billion. They're about to

0:09:30.420 --> 0:09:34.109
<v S1>be worth more than Apple, which is ridiculous. And I

0:09:34.110 --> 0:09:37.590
<v S1>think Scott Galloway was quoting some stats of like, it's

0:09:37.590 --> 0:09:40.110
<v S1>Nvidia at this point is worth more than like the

0:09:40.110 --> 0:09:44.819
<v S1>economy of Germany or something. Just ridiculous numbers. And I

0:09:44.820 --> 0:09:47.340
<v S1>think we're just starting with AI, so I don't see

0:09:47.340 --> 0:09:51.240
<v S1>how someone's going to catch up before, who knows how

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.280
<v S1>high Nvidia is going to go, but I feel like

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:55.560
<v S1>they got a massive lead and everyone's going to be

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:58.800
<v S1>trying to get in. AI is just starting. People are

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:02.880
<v S1>talking about plateaus. I think they're absolutely insane. So yeah,

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:06.480
<v S1>exciting times. Looks like we found some lithium in the US.

0:10:06.750 --> 0:10:11.610
<v S1>Massive untapped lithium source Microsoft is reimagining windows with a

0:10:11.610 --> 0:10:15.900
<v S1>deep dive into AI, introducing copilot NPCs that blend cutting

0:10:15.900 --> 0:10:19.800
<v S1>edge AI features directly into the operating system. People are saying, hey,

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:24.179
<v S1>nobody wants this. Well, yeah, they actually do. Once everyone

0:10:24.179 --> 0:10:28.350
<v S1>has the ability to remember everything they've done on their computer,

0:10:28.350 --> 0:10:30.840
<v S1>remember every screen, and they could just talk to their

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:33.930
<v S1>computer and be like, hey, where was that one email? Hey,

0:10:33.929 --> 0:10:36.900
<v S1>am I missing a thing? Hey, keep me up to date. Hey,

0:10:36.900 --> 0:10:38.940
<v S1>make a list of this. Hey, send a list of

0:10:38.940 --> 0:10:41.939
<v S1>this to all my friends. Hey, show me the most

0:10:41.940 --> 0:10:45.060
<v S1>important things I should be taking a look at. Hey,

0:10:45.059 --> 0:10:49.110
<v S1>reprioritize my work. Hey, rewrite this document for me. And

0:10:49.110 --> 0:10:51.959
<v S1>when I say rewrite this document for me, it knows

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.570
<v S1>that I'm looking at the screen and it knows what

0:10:54.570 --> 0:10:57.510
<v S1>document I'm looking at. So it just rewrites it and

0:10:57.510 --> 0:10:59.910
<v S1>it's like, ah, not so much. Make it less formal.

0:10:59.910 --> 0:11:03.630
<v S1>Boom rewrites it less formal. Okay, send it out to

0:11:03.630 --> 0:11:06.930
<v S1>all my directs or whatever. Boom sends it out. Once

0:11:06.929 --> 0:11:09.270
<v S1>you're interacting with a computer like that and you have

0:11:09.270 --> 0:11:12.180
<v S1>all of your history available, this is like I said

0:11:12.179 --> 0:11:15.540
<v S1>in my AI prediction video, everyone's going to want this,

0:11:15.540 --> 0:11:18.930
<v S1>and they're going to demand it. And what it requires

0:11:18.950 --> 0:11:22.820
<v S1>is everything being recorded all the time, all your screens,

0:11:22.820 --> 0:11:26.960
<v S1>all your conversations. Trust me, it's happening. It's going to happen.

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.089
<v S1>There's nothing that's going to stop that. There's nothing's going

0:11:29.090 --> 0:11:33.020
<v S1>to slow it down. It is too powerful and too awesome. Now,

0:11:33.020 --> 0:11:38.569
<v S1>will there be security issues? Oh yes. So many security issues.

0:11:38.570 --> 0:11:41.420
<v S1>And they will be horrible because it will be your

0:11:41.420 --> 0:11:45.679
<v S1>whole entire soul getting compromised when that stuff gets leaked. Right.

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:48.200
<v S1>It's every text message that came through everything. A little

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:51.470
<v S1>pop pop up, someone sent you a dirty joke or whatever,

0:11:51.470 --> 0:11:54.470
<v S1>or you sent somebody else a dirty joke that's also recorded.

0:11:54.470 --> 0:11:57.770
<v S1>That's also captured by AI. That's somewhere. Now it's in

0:11:57.770 --> 0:12:01.400
<v S1>some law document somewhere. Because guess what? Lawyers get access

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:03.860
<v S1>to that and everything. I mean, it's going to be

0:12:03.860 --> 0:12:07.190
<v S1>crazy world we're about to move into. But I tell you,

0:12:07.190 --> 0:12:09.589
<v S1>the downsides are not going to slow it down in

0:12:09.590 --> 0:12:13.219
<v S1>the slightest because the upsides are going to be so powerful.

0:12:13.490 --> 0:12:17.330
<v S1>Mapping AI's inner universe. This is really cool. Anthropic released

0:12:17.330 --> 0:12:22.430
<v S1>a paper on sonnet, which is their medium level model,

0:12:22.429 --> 0:12:26.569
<v S1>and basically showed how it thought essentially basically a lot

0:12:26.570 --> 0:12:30.350
<v S1>more transparency for AI, which has been traditionally opaque with

0:12:30.350 --> 0:12:35.060
<v S1>neural nets. China released a chatbot called Ask President XI,

0:12:35.420 --> 0:12:39.679
<v S1>and it allows citizens to ask Prachi how to be

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:43.339
<v S1>better socialists. Fantastic. I bet that's flying off the shelf.

0:12:43.580 --> 0:12:47.449
<v S1>Astronomers are preparing to use AI to tackle 300PB of

0:12:47.450 --> 0:12:51.110
<v S1>data annually. Yeah. Watch this guy. Find some stuff. Make

0:12:51.110 --> 0:12:54.980
<v S1>sure rocks don't hit us. Windows 11 Powertoys allows you

0:12:54.980 --> 0:12:59.870
<v S1>to transform AI transform clipboard content into different formats or

0:12:59.870 --> 0:13:04.670
<v S1>languages with a simple shortcut. Love it and it uses OpenAI. Cool.

0:13:04.670 --> 0:13:08.750
<v S1>No problem. Microservices might be all the rage, but this

0:13:08.750 --> 0:13:13.339
<v S1>thing basically says use modules instead of microservices. Interesting. X

0:13:13.340 --> 0:13:15.830
<v S1>is getting rid of public likes, so you can't get

0:13:15.830 --> 0:13:20.120
<v S1>in trouble for liking somebody who's controversial. You'll still be

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:22.010
<v S1>able to see when someone likes your stuff, and you'll

0:13:22.010 --> 0:13:24.260
<v S1>still be able to see your own likes, but you

0:13:24.260 --> 0:13:27.290
<v S1>won't be able to see other people's. You won't be

0:13:27.290 --> 0:13:30.350
<v S1>able to see someone who you hate and see a

0:13:30.350 --> 0:13:33.079
<v S1>third person who liked their stuff. That's what you won't

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:36.050
<v S1>be able to see. And Elon basically thinks that this

0:13:36.050 --> 0:13:38.599
<v S1>is going to increase the number of likes. And I

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:41.750
<v S1>think he's probably right about that. Focusing on fundamentals over

0:13:41.750 --> 0:13:45.620
<v S1>frameworks could be the secret sauce for long lasting tech skills.

0:13:45.620 --> 0:13:48.080
<v S1>Agree with this. This was a good essay. Shows you

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:52.459
<v S1>how to use ghidra for crafting gdb scripts that trace

0:13:52.460 --> 0:13:58.430
<v S1>function calls helping with vulnerability, hunting D3 in-depth guides. Love

0:13:58.429 --> 0:14:03.740
<v S1>me some D3. Really powerful library experts JS simplifies creating

0:14:03.740 --> 0:14:07.970
<v S1>multi-agent AI systems. Starting to get pretty turned off by

0:14:08.030 --> 0:14:11.270
<v S1>AI agent systems. Honestly, I'm heading down the path of

0:14:11.270 --> 0:14:13.400
<v S1>just building all my own stuff, and that's what I'm

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.730
<v S1>doing with substrate. So getting away from the agent frameworks,

0:14:16.730 --> 0:14:20.450
<v S1>I think just a lot of really cool stuff in

0:14:20.450 --> 0:14:24.410
<v S1>demos and not usable in production. That's what I'm finding.

0:14:24.410 --> 0:14:27.980
<v S1>And I think everyone's finding that who's actually building user

0:14:27.980 --> 0:14:33.590
<v S1>persona generator prompts simulates user interviews to create detailed user personas,

0:14:33.830 --> 0:14:38.600
<v S1>saving you from conducting dozens of real interviews. Yeah, wait

0:14:38.630 --> 0:14:43.010
<v S1>till you see what AI is going to hiring. Oh yeah,

0:14:43.010 --> 0:14:45.560
<v S1>that's what we're about to talk about. Job seekers are

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:49.760
<v S1>struggling to find work and employers can't seem to fill positions. Paradox.

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:53.240
<v S1>It is not a mystery. The problem is hiring managers

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:55.640
<v S1>need people ready to do the job and they don't

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.370
<v S1>want to train anyone. This is why degrees are mattering less,

0:14:58.370 --> 0:15:01.190
<v S1>and why somebody with an active tech blog or YouTube

0:15:01.190 --> 0:15:04.820
<v S1>channel who's actually building stuff and doing the thing can

0:15:04.820 --> 0:15:07.580
<v S1>get hired with no credentials over someone with a degree

0:15:07.580 --> 0:15:11.390
<v S1>in computer science, or two degrees, or a master's degree

0:15:11.390 --> 0:15:15.080
<v S1>or a PhD. The ability to actually do the thing

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:18.770
<v S1>is all that matters now. Expect to see AI services soon.

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.900
<v S1>Now look at a person's social media blog, YouTube, whatever,

0:15:22.900 --> 0:15:26.710
<v S1>and then do an interactive interview with them and give

0:15:26.710 --> 0:15:29.830
<v S1>a score of how likely they are to do a

0:15:29.830 --> 0:15:32.710
<v S1>good job at this job. This will cut through all

0:15:32.710 --> 0:15:35.320
<v S1>the credentials, all the fluff, all sorts of other BS

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.260
<v S1>and get at the real thing. The value of traditional

0:15:38.260 --> 0:15:42.940
<v S1>education will drastically fall because of this. Like pay attention

0:15:42.940 --> 0:15:47.110
<v S1>to this. The value of traditional education will drastically fall

0:15:47.110 --> 0:15:50.980
<v S1>as a result of this, because degrees won't significantly raise

0:15:50.980 --> 0:15:55.780
<v S1>these scores for most people. This is something this controversial point.

0:15:55.780 --> 0:15:58.360
<v S1>I used to think that it was all about expose

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:00.700
<v S1>people to the training and they will get better, and

0:16:00.700 --> 0:16:03.400
<v S1>you just need better training. If they're not moving, you

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:07.120
<v S1>give them better training. Turns out that's not it. It's

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.780
<v S1>actually something inside the person that if they are that

0:16:10.780 --> 0:16:14.560
<v S1>person who's going to be awesome, it doesn't take much

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:20.320
<v S1>to prompt them or to stimulate them into their curiosity,

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:24.700
<v S1>which just makes them a voracious reader and learner and studier.

0:16:24.700 --> 0:16:26.440
<v S1>And all of a sudden, boom, they shoot out of

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:28.960
<v S1>the thing. That's why the help desk is so good

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:33.370
<v S1>at finding talent, because it's a wide filter. There's so

0:16:33.370 --> 0:16:36.160
<v S1>many people on Help Desk, but there's somebody on help

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:40.270
<v S1>desk who, the moment they sat on the tier one floor,

0:16:40.300 --> 0:16:44.680
<v S1>they immediately like started answering all the questions for everyone else. Boom!

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.530
<v S1>They become tier two, boom. They become tier three. And

0:16:47.530 --> 0:16:50.410
<v S1>before long, if they have the right networking or whatever,

0:16:50.410 --> 0:16:52.990
<v S1>they go into networking, they go into sysadmin, or they

0:16:52.990 --> 0:16:56.110
<v S1>go into programming or they go into security or something,

0:16:56.110 --> 0:16:59.950
<v S1>and they shoot off and they become a star. And

0:16:59.950 --> 0:17:03.460
<v S1>an experienced person could have seen them at tier one

0:17:03.460 --> 0:17:05.980
<v S1>in tech and just been like, oh, that's a star

0:17:05.980 --> 0:17:10.700
<v S1>right there. First of that is that there are people

0:17:10.700 --> 0:17:14.119
<v S1>who come in with two degrees, go to tier one,

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:17.990
<v S1>you send them to Harvard, the best training, the best everything,

0:17:17.990 --> 0:17:21.530
<v S1>and they can't even move into tier two. They're there

0:17:21.530 --> 0:17:24.140
<v S1>for six years. And when they see a problem that

0:17:24.140 --> 0:17:26.659
<v S1>they've seen a million times, they call their manager or

0:17:26.660 --> 0:17:28.970
<v S1>they ask the person next to them, and that is

0:17:28.970 --> 0:17:32.150
<v S1>a function of them versus the other person. Now. And

0:17:32.150 --> 0:17:35.149
<v S1>there's lots of people in between what this is going

0:17:35.150 --> 0:17:38.480
<v S1>to do. And this is here's two extremes here. Lots

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:43.550
<v S1>of education, little ability to do the thing practically and

0:17:43.550 --> 0:17:48.649
<v S1>technically versus somebody who doesn't have much training at all. Right.

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:52.460
<v S1>No exposure to the stuff, no networking, no connections. And

0:17:52.460 --> 0:17:55.520
<v S1>they're just voracious. They just what? Oh, how do you

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:57.380
<v S1>do that? Whoa whoa whoa whoa. And they just jump

0:17:57.380 --> 0:17:59.930
<v S1>into it and jump all over it. And they learn

0:17:59.930 --> 0:18:02.570
<v S1>the stuff instantly and they're like, oh, you can just

0:18:02.570 --> 0:18:06.050
<v S1>code that. Oh, well, what's the name of that Python? Oh, okay.

0:18:06.050 --> 0:18:08.689
<v S1>I guess I'll go learn Python. They come back, they're like, hey,

0:18:08.690 --> 0:18:11.240
<v S1>I wrote a program to do that. It's like, when

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:13.610
<v S1>did you learn Python? Oh, I didn't, I just looked on.

0:18:13.609 --> 0:18:16.010
<v S1>I watched a couple of YouTube videos. I wrote a program.

0:18:16.010 --> 0:18:18.439
<v S1>Some people are like that and some people are the

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:22.609
<v S1>opposite of that. This is what I is good at.

0:18:22.609 --> 0:18:24.890
<v S1>It's going to be able to tell you the difference

0:18:24.890 --> 0:18:27.680
<v S1>between those. So guess what? You're going to be able

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:34.340
<v S1>to filter through tens, hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands of resumes,

0:18:34.340 --> 0:18:38.090
<v S1>find people like that, send them into an additional filter,

0:18:38.090 --> 0:18:41.090
<v S1>which is like a live interview with like an AI

0:18:41.090 --> 0:18:44.930
<v S1>avatar or whatever. It runs them through scenarios, sees how

0:18:44.930 --> 0:18:48.080
<v S1>curious they are. It's going to find the magic sauce,

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:50.390
<v S1>the same magic sauce that I'm talking about right now.

0:18:50.390 --> 0:18:53.510
<v S1>The AI is going to find that magic sauce. It's

0:18:53.510 --> 0:18:55.340
<v S1>going to give them a score, and they're going to

0:18:55.340 --> 0:18:57.560
<v S1>shoot to the top. And guess what? Everyone's going to

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:02.120
<v S1>go hire those people. Nobody wants to hire a new person.

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:05.210
<v S1>Nobody wants to train new people. This is why there

0:19:05.210 --> 0:19:08.090
<v S1>is the gap in hiring. This is why so many

0:19:08.090 --> 0:19:10.130
<v S1>people are getting out of college, can't find a job.

0:19:10.130 --> 0:19:13.399
<v S1>It's because they're like, hey, look, I've got my degrees.

0:19:13.670 --> 0:19:15.710
<v S1>Can't wait to do my training so you can teach

0:19:15.710 --> 0:19:18.080
<v S1>me how to do my job. And the hiring manager

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:20.870
<v S1>is like, yeah, so about that, we're busy. We don't

0:19:20.869 --> 0:19:25.370
<v S1>have time to train anybody, so we won't be hiring you.

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:28.940
<v S1>We will be hiring Caleb, who is a 15 year

0:19:28.940 --> 0:19:32.929
<v S1>old who is doing this job already and has been

0:19:32.930 --> 0:19:36.080
<v S1>for three years in between playing video games. And that's

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:37.610
<v S1>who we're going to hire instead of you with your

0:19:37.609 --> 0:19:43.639
<v S1>master's degrees. So it'll filter for drive, curiosity, obsession, and

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:47.420
<v S1>proof of work like actual builders and coders and people

0:19:47.420 --> 0:19:50.450
<v S1>who raise insightful questions that are curious. This is going

0:19:50.450 --> 0:19:54.110
<v S1>to spawn a completely new type of education dedicated to

0:19:54.109 --> 0:19:58.220
<v S1>making more people like the stars that I'm talking about,

0:19:58.220 --> 0:20:00.590
<v S1>because a lot of the people who are dull in

0:20:00.590 --> 0:20:02.990
<v S1>this way that I'm talking about, they were just let

0:20:02.990 --> 0:20:07.520
<v S1>down by their maybe it's genetic, maybe they're just not

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:11.090
<v S1>as smart. Of course, there are smarter, less smart people,

0:20:11.090 --> 0:20:14.150
<v S1>but I think a lot of this is cultural where

0:20:14.150 --> 0:20:18.080
<v S1>you have they were just not given curiosity as a

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:21.110
<v S1>thing as they were growing up. And this is another

0:20:21.109 --> 0:20:25.160
<v S1>opportunity for AI to change that education and not teach them. Oh,

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:27.950
<v S1>it's about what you can remember and instead teach them.

0:20:27.950 --> 0:20:31.190
<v S1>It's about what you find interesting, right? Get that curiosity

0:20:31.190 --> 0:20:34.670
<v S1>into them early, then expose them to modules of training

0:20:34.670 --> 0:20:38.359
<v S1>instead of stupid curricula. Tough times for new grads. Okay,

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:41.419
<v S1>same point. Yeah, see above. And of course this is

0:20:41.420 --> 0:20:44.060
<v S1>not the only factor, but yeah, hitting a wall with

0:20:44.060 --> 0:20:49.520
<v S1>entry level hiring projected to drop by 5.8% in 24. Yeah,

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:53.389
<v S1>wait till you see 25 and 26 and 27. It's

0:20:53.390 --> 0:20:57.050
<v S1>going to get nastier. Software engineer positions on indeed have

0:20:57.050 --> 0:21:02.780
<v S1>plummeted 30% from pre-pandemic levels. Even with all this stuff considered,

0:21:02.780 --> 0:21:05.689
<v S1>I still don't understand that number. That's ridiculous. That's got

0:21:05.690 --> 0:21:08.239
<v S1>to be some macroeconomic stuff. I'll have to talk to

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:11.000
<v S1>Mike about that. I don't know all the inputs coming in.

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:14.359
<v S1>I think the thing I'm describing is one of those inputs,

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:16.880
<v S1>but I don't know how that accounts for 30%. So

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:22.430
<v S1>obviously multifactorial is college overrated? Nearly 30% of Americans are

0:21:22.430 --> 0:21:25.910
<v S1>questioning the value of college, according to a recent Pew poll.

0:21:25.910 --> 0:21:32.990
<v S1>Once again, see above. Job hopping not just flaky, but strategic. Yeah, yeah,

0:21:32.990 --> 0:21:34.699
<v S1>I wrote this here. You're wondering why I say I

0:21:34.700 --> 0:21:38.540
<v S1>wrote this. I helps with this sometimes. Write some of

0:21:38.540 --> 0:21:43.010
<v S1>these sentences. Some portion of this could be I written

0:21:43.010 --> 0:21:45.980
<v S1>a lot of these I write myself or I have

0:21:45.980 --> 0:21:48.110
<v S1>to go and edit them just because I don't like

0:21:48.109 --> 0:21:50.690
<v S1>what the AI writes. So I have to do it myself.

0:21:50.690 --> 0:21:53.180
<v S1>Like I had to write this whole thing. I think

0:21:53.180 --> 0:21:55.489
<v S1>not because they're flaky, but because they're in search of

0:21:55.490 --> 0:21:58.580
<v S1>a culture that matches their drive. Sticking it out in

0:21:58.580 --> 0:22:01.730
<v S1>a toxic work environment can dole a high performance edge.

0:22:01.730 --> 0:22:05.870
<v S1>I think that might be I right there. Can't actually remember.

0:22:05.869 --> 0:22:08.810
<v S1>My AI is getting so good that. A it actually

0:22:08.810 --> 0:22:14.209
<v S1>copies me pretty well. I definitely write everything in the blue. 100% yeah.

0:22:14.210 --> 0:22:18.200
<v S1>So here's my main point for truly top performers. It's

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:21.080
<v S1>not bad to see them jump every 3 to 4 years.

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:24.560
<v S1>Hiring managers know they get bored quickly and that they

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:28.100
<v S1>can probably solve a bunch of problems, and then they

0:22:28.100 --> 0:22:29.899
<v S1>just leave because they want to solve a new challenge.

0:22:29.900 --> 0:22:32.030
<v S1>And plus they got a little bit of their stock payout.

0:22:32.450 --> 0:22:35.419
<v S1>I know tons of people like this, like star programmers,

0:22:35.420 --> 0:22:38.149
<v S1>and they just bounce around and nobody really cares because

0:22:38.150 --> 0:22:40.040
<v S1>they're just happy to have them when they show up.

0:22:40.340 --> 0:22:44.450
<v S1>It doesn't work for the whatever. 30 years ago IBM employee,

0:22:44.450 --> 0:22:47.630
<v S1>they'll be like, oh, you left after seven years, why

0:22:47.630 --> 0:22:50.119
<v S1>are your pants on fire or whatever? All right. So

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:52.969
<v S1>now they're saying avoiding the sun might actually be a

0:22:52.970 --> 0:22:56.389
<v S1>risk factor. Yeah. So get too much sun. You'll die.

0:22:56.390 --> 0:22:59.690
<v S1>Don't get enough sun. You'll die. Punchline. You'll die. I

0:22:59.690 --> 0:23:02.840
<v S1>definitely believe this. I think there's value to this whole like,

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:07.610
<v S1>get sun touch grass thing grounding. Get in touch with nature, whatever. Yeah,

0:23:07.609 --> 0:23:11.929
<v S1>definitely true for me, anecdotally and possibly anecdotally as well.

0:23:11.930 --> 0:23:14.420
<v S1>I think we need more science on this. More people

0:23:14.420 --> 0:23:17.420
<v S1>are doing marijuana than drinking now. I guess we could

0:23:17.420 --> 0:23:19.910
<v S1>take that as a win. That drinking is down because

0:23:19.910 --> 0:23:23.390
<v S1>Uberman said alcohol is poison. He also went pretty hard

0:23:23.390 --> 0:23:27.710
<v S1>on cannabis as far as I can remember. Psychedelics as painkillers. Yeah,

0:23:27.710 --> 0:23:30.920
<v S1>this is getting a lot of press. One third of

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:35.570
<v S1>Amazon warehouse workers are on food stamps or Medicaid. That

0:23:35.570 --> 0:23:38.690
<v S1>is not a good number one file to rule them all.

0:23:38.690 --> 0:23:44.900
<v S1>One massive, sprawling text file I am in favor of. Text.

0:23:44.900 --> 0:23:49.040
<v S1>Text is my favorite. I love large files, broken down,

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:53.900
<v S1>markdown bullets. Super clear, easy to read. I love this

0:23:53.900 --> 0:23:57.170
<v S1>whole vibe, and I'm using it for fabric and managing

0:23:57.170 --> 0:24:01.010
<v S1>my own internal context and everything. US Justice Department is

0:24:01.010 --> 0:24:05.840
<v S1>gearing up to dismantle the Live Nation Ticketmaster giant. Hallelujah!

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:10.220
<v S1>So overdue. And thank you for Taylor Swift, because I

0:24:10.220 --> 0:24:12.740
<v S1>think she had something to do with this. California is

0:24:12.740 --> 0:24:16.909
<v S1>getting over a quarter of its energy from sun soared.

0:24:16.910 --> 0:24:19.609
<v S1>Finding is not what you think. An argument from one

0:24:19.609 --> 0:24:23.150
<v S1>expert claiming everything we know about sword fighting is bad.

0:24:23.330 --> 0:24:26.450
<v S1>It's my favorite Paul Graham essay. Great work happens by

0:24:26.450 --> 0:24:32.180
<v S1>focusing consistently on something you're genuinely interested in. I love

0:24:32.180 --> 0:24:36.590
<v S1>this sentence. When you pause to take stock, you're surprised

0:24:36.590 --> 0:24:39.590
<v S1>how far you've come. Paul Graham is one of my

0:24:39.590 --> 0:24:43.550
<v S1>favorite essayists ever, and this is one of my favorite ones.

0:24:43.550 --> 0:24:45.590
<v S1>I think it's called Great Work or How to Do

0:24:45.590 --> 0:24:47.570
<v S1>Great Work is the name of the essay should have

0:24:47.570 --> 0:24:50.239
<v S1>linked it here. This rhymes with a realization I've been

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:52.879
<v S1>having lately that the best leaders and founders have something

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:55.220
<v S1>in common, which is like we were talking about before,

0:24:55.220 --> 0:24:58.760
<v S1>actually obsession. It's not that they're disciplined, or they might be,

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:01.550
<v S1>and they probably are, but they just might be obsessed,

0:25:01.550 --> 0:25:04.610
<v S1>which tends to look a lot like discipline because they

0:25:04.609 --> 0:25:08.720
<v S1>both produce consistent effort in a uniform direction. I find

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:12.200
<v S1>myself increasingly looking for people who are obsessed with things,

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:15.709
<v S1>life and idea, whatever. They can't stop thinking about it.

0:25:15.710 --> 0:25:18.680
<v S1>And the million different ideas they have tend to revolve

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:22.070
<v S1>around that same concept. It's one that my buddy Joel

0:25:22.070 --> 0:25:25.399
<v S1>Paris sent me the link to. This is cool. Nostalgia

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:27.260
<v S1>tends to peak at a single age, and I think

0:25:27.260 --> 0:25:30.350
<v S1>this is either Pew or Gallup. I mix the two up,

0:25:30.350 --> 0:25:33.290
<v S1>but if you draw the line, it's somewhere like right here,

0:25:33.290 --> 0:25:37.550
<v S1>and that's around 15. Yeah, 15 years old, 18 years

0:25:37.550 --> 0:25:40.910
<v S1>old or whatever. And guess what? The most close knit

0:25:40.910 --> 0:25:44.450
<v S1>community is the most moral society, the least political division,

0:25:44.450 --> 0:25:48.740
<v S1>the happiest families, the most reliable news reporting. It all

0:25:48.740 --> 0:25:53.480
<v S1>happens when you're 18 years old. So regardless of your age,

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:56.899
<v S1>whenever you were 18, that's when you think the Golden

0:25:56.900 --> 0:26:02.389
<v S1>Age was brilliant. Data visualization recommendation of the week. Become

0:26:02.390 --> 0:26:05.990
<v S1>able to articulate who you are and what you're about

0:26:05.990 --> 0:26:09.379
<v S1>in 25 to 50 words. And the aphorism of the

0:26:09.380 --> 0:26:14.030
<v S1>week fall seven times. Stand up eight, fall seven times.

0:26:14.030 --> 0:26:19.590
<v S1>Stand up eight. Japanese proverb. Unsupervised Learning is produced and

0:26:19.590 --> 0:26:23.130
<v S1>edited by Daniel Meisler on a Neumann U87 AI microphone

0:26:23.130 --> 0:26:27.119
<v S1>using Hindenburg. Intro and outro music is by zombie with

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:29.940
<v S1>the why and to get the text and links from

0:26:29.940 --> 0:26:32.070
<v S1>this episode, sign up for the newsletter version of the

0:26:32.070 --> 0:26:37.610
<v S1>show at Daniel meisler.com/newsletter. We'll see you next time.