WEBVTT - UL NO. 485: STANDARD EDITION: Netflix RCE, My Current AI Stack, All-in on Claude Code, and more...

0:00:17.267 --> 0:00:20.267
<v S1>All right. Welcome to episode 45. Posted a bunch of

0:00:20.267 --> 0:00:23.347
<v S1>fabric extractions of stuff that I've been watching and reading

0:00:23.347 --> 0:00:27.227
<v S1>and stuff like that. So like YouTube videos, blog posts,

0:00:27.627 --> 0:00:30.107
<v S1>academic papers, and I think I'm going to do more

0:00:30.107 --> 0:00:33.107
<v S1>of this because I'm actually building this into my Pi,

0:00:33.147 --> 0:00:37.107
<v S1>which is pi personal AI infrastructure. And this is the

0:00:37.107 --> 0:00:40.307
<v S1>infrastructure you've heard me talking about in the augmented class.

0:00:40.987 --> 0:00:43.987
<v S1>And just like all over X and in the newsletter

0:00:43.987 --> 0:00:46.987
<v S1>over the years, this is basically the back end core

0:00:46.987 --> 0:00:51.347
<v S1>infrastructure that I basically runs for my life. So it's

0:00:51.346 --> 0:00:56.987
<v S1>basically finding all my content. It's categorizing all my content, labeling, sorting,

0:00:57.027 --> 0:01:02.867
<v S1>doing things like that, extracting summaries, um, you know, characterizing.

0:01:02.867 --> 0:01:06.147
<v S1>And I'm basically going to use that to continue enhancing

0:01:06.147 --> 0:01:08.467
<v S1>my life. Right. So I'm always adding to this thing.

0:01:09.267 --> 0:01:11.947
<v S1>So one of the core components of that is actually

0:01:13.507 --> 0:01:17.607
<v S1>finding new content, um, in an automated way. So basically

0:01:17.607 --> 0:01:21.167
<v S1>there's I'll give you a good example. There's on arXiv.

0:01:21.207 --> 0:01:22.967
<v S1>I think that's the way you pronounce this. I've heard

0:01:22.967 --> 0:01:27.207
<v S1>people say this, I used to call it arXiv because whatever.

0:01:27.207 --> 0:01:32.767
<v S1>I'm silly. arXiv, I guess it's called arXiv. It's a

0:01:32.767 --> 0:01:36.727
<v S1>cool name. It's a better name than arXiv, although that's

0:01:36.727 --> 0:01:40.206
<v S1>how it's spelled. But whatever on arXiv there is a

0:01:40.607 --> 0:01:48.287
<v S1>RSS feed for. CS I so it's papers coming out

0:01:48.287 --> 0:01:52.647
<v S1>of arXiv that are both CS related and AI related.

0:01:52.687 --> 0:01:55.447
<v S1>And obviously this is a sweet spot for me. So

0:01:56.047 --> 0:01:57.967
<v S1>I want to be able to go and get those papers.

0:01:57.967 --> 0:02:01.247
<v S1>But I also want to know how high quality they are, like,

0:02:01.247 --> 0:02:04.487
<v S1>what are the interesting claims that they're making? Like how

0:02:04.487 --> 0:02:08.687
<v S1>good was their methodology, their testing? Like, was it a

0:02:08.686 --> 0:02:12.007
<v S1>meta study? Did they do their own independent research for

0:02:12.007 --> 0:02:15.937
<v S1>the paper, like all those combinations. And there's already a

0:02:15.936 --> 0:02:18.337
<v S1>fabric pattern for this, which is analyze paper. And I

0:02:18.337 --> 0:02:20.417
<v S1>think I have a new version of it as well.

0:02:20.737 --> 0:02:23.377
<v S1>But anyway, I want to do that type of automated

0:02:23.377 --> 0:02:27.337
<v S1>analysis on every paper I might want to read. Okay.

0:02:27.376 --> 0:02:30.096
<v S1>This is kind of giving you hints of like what

0:02:30.096 --> 0:02:33.897
<v S1>my personal AI infrastructure does. And by the way, I'm

0:02:33.897 --> 0:02:35.776
<v S1>aware of the fact that I'm saying like a little

0:02:35.776 --> 0:02:40.376
<v S1>bit too much. So I'm trying to tamper that down.

0:02:40.417 --> 0:02:43.537
<v S1>I like the word. I think it's a cool transition word,

0:02:43.536 --> 0:02:45.417
<v S1>but I don't want to use it 40 times in

0:02:45.417 --> 0:02:50.697
<v S1>every sentence. Anyway, this is the infrastructure that I'm actually building,

0:02:51.017 --> 0:02:53.577
<v S1>and this is one of the modules that's really, really

0:02:53.577 --> 0:02:56.416
<v S1>important to me because it's not just papers. I want

0:02:56.457 --> 0:02:58.417
<v S1>to see this for open source intelligence. I want to

0:02:58.417 --> 0:03:00.897
<v S1>see this for all the different stuff. So these are

0:03:00.897 --> 0:03:04.656
<v S1>all the independent modules that I'm building. And actually those

0:03:04.656 --> 0:03:07.977
<v S1>essentially turn into products for me. Right. So my Intel

0:03:07.977 --> 0:03:10.897
<v S1>product is going to be the output of one of these.

0:03:11.137 --> 0:03:15.397
<v S1>Threshold is already the output of several of these, right?

0:03:15.517 --> 0:03:21.637
<v S1>So anyway, that's just a brief little thing on my pie. Pie.

0:03:23.957 --> 0:03:27.677
<v S1>All that to say that these fabric extractions are essentially

0:03:27.677 --> 0:03:31.637
<v S1>outputs from these modules where it's found a piece of

0:03:31.637 --> 0:03:34.436
<v S1>really unique content, or I manually found it and I

0:03:34.436 --> 0:03:39.796
<v S1>just manually ran, uh, fabric against it. And it outputted

0:03:39.797 --> 0:03:42.077
<v S1>this output so you could check it on X, you

0:03:42.077 --> 0:03:44.197
<v S1>could see it on, you know, it. I do a

0:03:44.197 --> 0:03:46.517
<v S1>few of these in the newsletter every once in a while,

0:03:46.517 --> 0:03:50.397
<v S1>but I find it really useful to go and extract predictions,

0:03:50.637 --> 0:03:54.517
<v S1>to extract wisdom, to extract insights, or is another one

0:03:54.517 --> 0:03:58.197
<v S1>of my favorite. There's also one that just extracts quotes,

0:03:58.557 --> 0:04:02.597
<v S1>which can also be really interesting. There's um, I think

0:04:02.597 --> 0:04:07.197
<v S1>there's a one that just extracts like data or recommendations.

0:04:07.197 --> 0:04:11.157
<v S1>I think there's definitely a recommendations. One, actually, now that

0:04:11.157 --> 0:04:13.447
<v S1>I think about it, I need to have one that

0:04:13.447 --> 0:04:16.847
<v S1>extracts like a book list or a watch list. Um,

0:04:16.847 --> 0:04:18.607
<v S1>I'm not sure if I already made that one or

0:04:18.607 --> 0:04:21.487
<v S1>if I need to go add that to fabric. Anyway,

0:04:21.487 --> 0:04:27.207
<v S1>all this to say, I want my pi Pi always

0:04:27.207 --> 0:04:31.607
<v S1>running in the background, always collecting, always finding, always discovering,

0:04:31.607 --> 0:04:36.287
<v S1>always rating. And before you think, well hold on, I

0:04:36.327 --> 0:04:39.607
<v S1>is doing too much work for you. No, it is

0:04:39.607 --> 0:04:42.407
<v S1>not doing too much work for me. And here's why.

0:04:43.687 --> 0:04:48.367
<v S1>Part of this entire thing is the determination of what

0:04:48.367 --> 0:04:52.207
<v S1>I should go and do slowly. Okay? Anything that makes

0:04:52.207 --> 0:04:56.487
<v S1>it into that bucket, I must sit down and manually

0:04:56.487 --> 0:05:00.807
<v S1>enjoy and listen to and process and use my pen

0:05:00.807 --> 0:05:04.447
<v S1>and my index cards and write down notes or Apple

0:05:04.447 --> 0:05:06.367
<v S1>notes or whatever it is if I have to pause

0:05:06.367 --> 0:05:09.607
<v S1>this thing. But I still think the absolute best way

0:05:09.607 --> 0:05:14.347
<v S1>to experience anything is in the slow form, right? What's

0:05:14.347 --> 0:05:17.387
<v S1>still the best possible way to spend an evening is

0:05:17.427 --> 0:05:22.107
<v S1>with friends and family and smart people or whatever, and

0:05:22.107 --> 0:05:26.827
<v S1>you're basically having conversation with actual humans. So to me,

0:05:26.827 --> 0:05:29.827
<v S1>all this AI stuff, the whole purpose of it is

0:05:29.827 --> 0:05:33.387
<v S1>to enhance your ability to do those things. And this

0:05:33.387 --> 0:05:36.307
<v S1>is still this is all part of human 3.0. It's

0:05:36.307 --> 0:05:38.987
<v S1>all part of like, what should we actually be doing?

0:05:39.307 --> 0:05:42.987
<v S1>And what we should actually be doing is magnifying human experience.

0:05:43.427 --> 0:05:48.627
<v S1>Slow experience. Right. All this speeding up and all this

0:05:48.627 --> 0:05:52.147
<v S1>collection and all this, I should be in service of that,

0:05:52.507 --> 0:05:57.827
<v S1>not in opposition to that. All right. That's how we

0:05:57.827 --> 0:06:00.227
<v S1>get stuck on the first item. Not even getting into

0:06:00.227 --> 0:06:04.187
<v S1>the newsletter. Okay. Yeah. Go sign up for the podcast again,

0:06:04.187 --> 0:06:06.787
<v S1>which is silly because you're already listening to it. Uh,

0:06:06.787 --> 0:06:11.197
<v S1>let's see here my friend Tracy Talbot is presenting Tell

0:06:11.237 --> 0:06:17.437
<v S1>No Lies. Teaching AI to know when it doesn't know. Yeah,

0:06:17.437 --> 0:06:19.737
<v S1>to know when it doesn't know. And this is June

0:06:19.737 --> 0:06:22.877
<v S1>26th in Austin, and she's got a LinkedIn post that

0:06:22.877 --> 0:06:25.957
<v S1>I linked in the newsletter. I worked with her at Apple.

0:06:25.957 --> 0:06:31.676
<v S1>She was extraordinary there at Apple. She was doing data quality, uh,

0:06:31.677 --> 0:06:37.517
<v S1>on our team. And yeah, just really, really great person and, um,

0:06:37.597 --> 0:06:42.197
<v S1>really thoughtful about data quality and data security and all

0:06:42.197 --> 0:06:48.197
<v S1>these different aspects of data and basically data management at

0:06:48.197 --> 0:06:51.557
<v S1>scale and thinking about what it means to trust data.

0:06:51.997 --> 0:06:56.197
<v S1>So now she's getting into AI, and she's been doing

0:06:56.197 --> 0:06:57.957
<v S1>a whole lot of really cool stuff with that. So

0:06:57.957 --> 0:07:01.837
<v S1>definitely recommend going to see her talk again. That's June

0:07:01.837 --> 0:07:05.797
<v S1>26th in Austin. All right. Places I'm going to be

0:07:05.797 --> 0:07:09.777
<v S1>speaking in 2025, and I realized I missed an item

0:07:09.777 --> 0:07:13.657
<v S1>on the list. Various talks and panels. Blackhat USA in

0:07:13.657 --> 0:07:17.657
<v S1>Vegas speaking at the Swiss Cyberstorm in Bern, Switzerland. It's

0:07:17.657 --> 0:07:20.777
<v S1>going to be an AI workshop. Actually, I'm going to

0:07:20.777 --> 0:07:22.937
<v S1>do a workshop for people, which is going to be

0:07:22.937 --> 0:07:27.697
<v S1>a combination of like augmented fabric slash, essentially like personal

0:07:27.697 --> 0:07:30.177
<v S1>AI infrastructure is kind of what that thing's going to

0:07:30.177 --> 0:07:34.817
<v S1>be about. Keynoting Appsec USA in DC in November and

0:07:34.817 --> 0:07:40.537
<v S1>speaking at Blackhat Mia in Saudi Arabia in December. And

0:07:40.537 --> 0:07:43.017
<v S1>the one that I missed is I'm probably going to

0:07:43.017 --> 0:07:47.697
<v S1>be doing something in Sweden as well. Um, I can't

0:07:47.737 --> 0:07:50.737
<v S1>remember the exact date for that one, but, uh, yeah,

0:07:51.057 --> 0:07:53.737
<v S1>I'll probably add that to the list for this next

0:07:53.737 --> 0:07:59.577
<v S1>coming newsletter. On Monday, personal tech Stack updates I'm all

0:07:59.577 --> 0:08:02.457
<v S1>in on cloud code. I'm not going to go into why,

0:08:02.497 --> 0:08:08.147
<v S1>but ultimately it's because here I am going into why, uh,

0:08:08.307 --> 0:08:13.787
<v S1>anthropic uses this as their agentic coding agent, and they've

0:08:13.827 --> 0:08:18.027
<v S1>gone all in on Agentic coding, which means this thing

0:08:18.027 --> 0:08:22.427
<v S1>isn't like hacking together agents. It's actually using agents to

0:08:22.467 --> 0:08:25.907
<v S1>execute the various tasks. And as of today, I just

0:08:25.907 --> 0:08:29.027
<v S1>updated cloud code and now it has planning built in.

0:08:29.947 --> 0:08:32.666
<v S1>So as I've been talking about pretty much everywhere, I

0:08:32.667 --> 0:08:38.667
<v S1>think scaffolding around AI is the superpower that's about to

0:08:38.707 --> 0:08:42.867
<v S1>unlock this whole thing, because the models are already smart.

0:08:42.867 --> 0:08:45.547
<v S1>The problem is they can't think for long. They have

0:08:45.547 --> 0:08:49.666
<v S1>short memories. So we have all these context problems. So

0:08:50.347 --> 0:08:55.147
<v S1>any any person, any intelligent being gets really stupid when

0:08:55.146 --> 0:09:00.146
<v S1>it can't remember longer than, you know, a short conversation.

0:09:00.546 --> 0:09:03.027
<v S1>And then you have to go back into this stored

0:09:03.026 --> 0:09:06.967
<v S1>memory bank. And it's not perfect. I'm talking about rag,

0:09:06.967 --> 0:09:10.607
<v S1>for example. Or if you have actual humans and they

0:09:10.607 --> 0:09:13.327
<v S1>struggle with long term memory or even short term memory,

0:09:13.766 --> 0:09:16.766
<v S1>obviously they're going to be less functional, right? They're going

0:09:16.807 --> 0:09:18.927
<v S1>to be less capable than they used to be before

0:09:18.926 --> 0:09:25.327
<v S1>they lost those abilities. So the ability to um, as

0:09:25.367 --> 0:09:29.167
<v S1>Dwarkesh talks about, learn on the job. Okay. You think

0:09:29.166 --> 0:09:32.247
<v S1>about a knowledge worker. They go in, they do orientation,

0:09:32.247 --> 0:09:34.807
<v S1>they learn on the job. Okay. Guess what? After that

0:09:34.807 --> 0:09:38.566
<v S1>first week, they're way better than when they started because

0:09:38.567 --> 0:09:41.806
<v S1>now they have some knowledge. Well, what happens after six months?

0:09:41.807 --> 0:09:44.567
<v S1>What happens after a year? What happens after they've been

0:09:44.567 --> 0:09:48.207
<v S1>there for 20 years. They now have all this stored

0:09:48.207 --> 0:09:52.287
<v S1>knowledge about this company, which is now part of their context.

0:09:53.247 --> 0:09:57.766
<v S1>But the difference is with a human, they are naturally, fluidly.

0:09:57.766 --> 0:10:01.887
<v S1>Every time they make a decision, they are thinking of

0:10:02.016 --> 0:10:06.497
<v S1>their stored knowledge. They incorporate all of their decisions with

0:10:06.497 --> 0:10:10.417
<v S1>their stored knowledge every time they make any decision. That

0:10:10.416 --> 0:10:14.416
<v S1>is a thing that I currently cannot do. It is struggling.

0:10:14.416 --> 0:10:16.576
<v S1>It's like, oh, I've got to go grab all this

0:10:16.577 --> 0:10:20.296
<v S1>context and stuff it into the prompt. How do you

0:10:20.296 --> 0:10:24.416
<v S1>grab context of 25 years of learning at a job?

0:10:25.296 --> 0:10:27.056
<v S1>How do you know what that even means? How do

0:10:27.057 --> 0:10:32.217
<v S1>you even know what to query to stuff into your

0:10:32.256 --> 0:10:37.177
<v S1>decision making process? This is completely transparent with humans. When

0:10:37.176 --> 0:10:40.256
<v S1>we are like, oh, let me approach this problem from

0:10:40.256 --> 0:10:43.097
<v S1>a holistic standpoint. Let me talk to talk to all

0:10:43.097 --> 0:10:46.057
<v S1>these disparate teams across the org. And I'm going to

0:10:46.057 --> 0:10:47.776
<v S1>gather notes and I'm going to take notes. I'm going

0:10:47.776 --> 0:10:50.577
<v S1>to write them down or whatever. Your brain is going

0:10:50.617 --> 0:10:53.417
<v S1>crazy with all of its knowledge that you've gathered over

0:10:53.416 --> 0:10:57.536
<v S1>these 25 years, and it's making its own queries and

0:10:57.536 --> 0:11:01.597
<v S1>pulling back that context. And these are coming back to

0:11:01.597 --> 0:11:04.837
<v S1>you as kind of like insights or thoughts or creativity.

0:11:05.557 --> 0:11:08.156
<v S1>You're not getting to see exactly what the queries look

0:11:08.156 --> 0:11:12.197
<v S1>like or even what the returned results look like. We

0:11:12.197 --> 0:11:15.756
<v S1>do not have this with AI. We must manually go

0:11:16.156 --> 0:11:20.797
<v S1>and make manual queries into context, like with rag or

0:11:20.837 --> 0:11:25.756
<v S1>like with stuffing other context or context summaries into the

0:11:25.756 --> 0:11:29.756
<v S1>prompts themselves, right? This is the scaffolding that we need.

0:11:29.796 --> 0:11:35.277
<v S1>We need to emulate the process that humans execute naturally

0:11:35.437 --> 0:11:39.237
<v S1>every day, you know, hundreds or thousands or millions of times.

0:11:39.237 --> 0:11:42.556
<v S1>However many times it is that we're making decisions and

0:11:42.557 --> 0:11:47.357
<v S1>little tiny, you know, nano decisions and micro decisions. So

0:11:48.756 --> 0:11:53.357
<v S1>I don't remember how I got onto this, but scaffolding massively,

0:11:53.357 --> 0:11:57.997
<v S1>massively important. And, uh, that's why I think context is,

0:11:58.036 --> 0:12:01.646
<v S1>is so important to all of this stuff. Um. Oh,

0:12:01.687 --> 0:12:05.406
<v S1>I remember how Claude Cote. So they are all in

0:12:05.406 --> 0:12:08.446
<v S1>on the agent stuff, and they are all in on

0:12:08.487 --> 0:12:12.047
<v S1>the planning component. Okay, this planning component is yet another

0:12:12.046 --> 0:12:15.807
<v S1>piece of what I just talked about. It is, you know,

0:12:15.847 --> 0:12:19.047
<v S1>keeping in mind what we're trying to do overall and

0:12:19.046 --> 0:12:21.926
<v S1>then checking off little boxes of like, yeah, we've done this. Yeah,

0:12:21.926 --> 0:12:27.886
<v S1>we've done this. It's all about, uh, context management. Now

0:12:27.926 --> 0:12:31.326
<v S1>context is a little bit, um, overloaded here. I would

0:12:31.327 --> 0:12:36.967
<v S1>say context planning management. Um, learning on the job management,

0:12:37.607 --> 0:12:41.127
<v S1>long term task management. These are the types of things

0:12:41.127 --> 0:12:47.766
<v S1>that really good knowledge workers, like a principle engineer who's

0:12:47.766 --> 0:12:51.327
<v S1>been somewhere for 25 years. These are the types of

0:12:51.327 --> 0:12:54.006
<v S1>things that they are really good at. And these are

0:12:54.006 --> 0:12:56.847
<v S1>the things in my opinion, this is a prediction and

0:12:56.847 --> 0:13:01.427
<v S1>this is just my prediction, is that we're going to

0:13:01.426 --> 0:13:05.307
<v S1>see major advances in those areas, which are actually kind

0:13:05.307 --> 0:13:08.227
<v S1>of like tricks. This is what I've been telling my friend, uh,

0:13:08.426 --> 0:13:12.266
<v S1>Joel ever since 23, that these types of tricks are

0:13:12.266 --> 0:13:14.426
<v S1>the things that are going to push us over the edge.

0:13:14.627 --> 0:13:16.667
<v S1>These are the types of tricks that are going to

0:13:17.307 --> 0:13:23.306
<v S1>hyper jump. I way further ahead. And I think what

0:13:23.347 --> 0:13:26.867
<v S1>I think my theory has been borne out through things

0:13:26.867 --> 0:13:33.347
<v S1>like Post-training post-training is not fundamentally better neural nets. It's

0:13:33.347 --> 0:13:38.427
<v S1>better ways of shaping and getting neural nets to do

0:13:38.426 --> 0:13:43.146
<v S1>what we actually want them to do. Right. So just

0:13:43.146 --> 0:13:46.627
<v S1>zooming out, I think Cloud Code has this figured out.

0:13:46.627 --> 0:13:51.067
<v S1>I think anthropic really deeply understands this. And they are

0:13:51.067 --> 0:13:56.847
<v S1>building agents and planning management and context Management. They're doing really,

0:13:56.847 --> 0:14:00.207
<v S1>really well with it in a way that I'm just

0:14:00.247 --> 0:14:02.967
<v S1>really excited to build things with cloud code in a

0:14:02.967 --> 0:14:05.967
<v S1>way that's not really hitting for me. Uh, on the

0:14:05.967 --> 0:14:12.287
<v S1>other platforms, my secondary backup for cloud code is still cursor. Um,

0:14:12.286 --> 0:14:15.687
<v S1>I was messing with, uh, windsurf for a while and

0:14:15.687 --> 0:14:18.167
<v S1>some other tools, and I still dabble with all the

0:14:18.166 --> 0:14:21.527
<v S1>other tools when I see something, uh, come out or new,

0:14:21.527 --> 0:14:24.927
<v S1>I go and tinker with it. But right now, cloud

0:14:24.927 --> 0:14:29.727
<v S1>code is my main, with cursor being secondary. I'm also

0:14:29.727 --> 0:14:33.207
<v S1>switched over to using Dia as my main daily driver

0:14:33.207 --> 0:14:37.567
<v S1>for my browser. And um, I'm on all the Mac

0:14:37.567 --> 0:14:43.206
<v S1>OS 26 betas. They are fantastic. And uh, specifically having

0:14:43.207 --> 0:14:47.847
<v S1>your phone app on the desktop is fantastic. And, uh,

0:14:47.847 --> 0:14:51.807
<v S1>the podcast app is much improved. You can actually go

0:14:51.847 --> 0:14:53.527
<v S1>above the two x limit. You can go up to

0:14:53.527 --> 0:14:57.217
<v S1>three x now. And yeah, overall I would say Apple

0:14:57.217 --> 0:15:01.976
<v S1>just really did a lot of quality updates. For example

0:15:02.017 --> 0:15:07.137
<v S1>AirPod handoffs are much better. So that's it for updates

0:15:07.137 --> 0:15:11.017
<v S1>I think. And let's get into cybersecurity. Apple quietly fixed

0:15:11.017 --> 0:15:16.377
<v S1>an iPhone zero Day that was used against journalists. Echo

0:15:16.377 --> 0:15:22.857
<v S1>leak using uses markdown syntax to bypass Microsoft 365 Copilot security.

0:15:23.337 --> 0:15:25.897
<v S1>So some researchers found a smart way to steal data

0:15:25.897 --> 0:15:31.456
<v S1>from Copilot by using obscure markdown link formats that Microsoft

0:15:31.457 --> 0:15:37.697
<v S1>did not filter. Researchers turn 2 a.m. Tokyo hotel room

0:15:37.697 --> 0:15:43.537
<v S1>chat into a Netflix RC. So Chubbs, who is a

0:15:43.897 --> 0:15:51.337
<v S1>friend of mine and very, very good, um, attacker, uh, attacker. Um,

0:15:51.817 --> 0:15:56.237
<v S1>what are we saying? Researcher. Bug. Bounty guy. Um. Security

0:15:56.277 --> 0:16:00.677
<v S1>guy focused on offensive security and automated testing. He's also

0:16:00.717 --> 0:16:04.317
<v S1>the creator of Asset note. So he's just one of

0:16:04.317 --> 0:16:08.157
<v S1>the top, you know, top 1% or 1% of the 1%.

0:16:08.477 --> 0:16:10.837
<v S1>I would put him in Sam Curry like up in

0:16:10.877 --> 0:16:15.917
<v S1>that top, top echelon. And, uh, basically they found, uh,

0:16:17.797 --> 0:16:21.237
<v S1>the way they found a way to attack an unclaimed

0:16:21.237 --> 0:16:25.677
<v S1>internal package name called NFC logger. And they use that

0:16:25.677 --> 0:16:30.517
<v S1>to get Archie actually on a Netflix, uh, system or

0:16:30.517 --> 0:16:34.757
<v S1>within Netflix itself. And I'm sure they fixed that. Otherwise

0:16:34.757 --> 0:16:39.037
<v S1>we wouldn't be talking about it. All right. Going to

0:16:39.037 --> 0:16:43.477
<v S1>skip over the Tliose sessions. Uh, offer. That was in

0:16:43.477 --> 0:16:46.797
<v S1>the thing. Uh, don't really want to talk about that. Um,

0:16:47.157 --> 0:16:51.087
<v S1>HTML spec now escapes angle brackets and attributes. Tributes, so

0:16:51.087 --> 0:16:53.887
<v S1>Chrome and other browsers are now going to start escaping

0:16:54.847 --> 0:16:59.647
<v S1>left and right. Caret characters in HTML attributes to prevent

0:16:59.647 --> 0:17:06.647
<v S1>mutation XSS attacks Interpol dismantles 20,000 malicious IPS linked to

0:17:06.687 --> 0:17:13.167
<v S1>69 malware variants. Cursor security rules project tackles unsafe AI

0:17:13.207 --> 0:17:20.206
<v S1>generated code, Europol says Europol yeah, Europol says stolen data

0:17:20.207 --> 0:17:24.526
<v S1>has become the new underground currency. Phishing messages this is

0:17:24.527 --> 0:17:27.927
<v S1>a quote created by Llms have higher success rate than

0:17:27.927 --> 0:17:31.567
<v S1>those written by humans. And this is a euro pool.

0:17:33.367 --> 0:17:41.806
<v S1>Io CTA report US airlines quietly selling flight data to DHS. Yeah.

0:17:41.847 --> 0:17:45.527
<v S1>Government agencies can search 39 months of flight data, including

0:17:45.527 --> 0:17:50.346
<v S1>passenger names, itineraries, travel dates and credit card numbers, and

0:17:50.347 --> 0:17:54.786
<v S1>other people buying this data are include like the Secret Service, SEC, DEA,

0:17:55.147 --> 0:18:01.427
<v S1>and US Marshals Service. And that's in addition to the

0:18:01.466 --> 0:18:06.267
<v S1>DHS and all its various services. Amazon's AI agents can

0:18:06.267 --> 0:18:12.187
<v S1>build cyber defense signatures in minutes. National security thoughts on

0:18:12.547 --> 0:18:16.067
<v S1>Israel's action against Iran. I'm actually not going to go

0:18:16.067 --> 0:18:22.107
<v S1>super into this one. It's an evolving situation. As everyone knows,

0:18:22.427 --> 0:18:26.907
<v S1>new stuff is happening like every few hours on this, uh, go,

0:18:26.907 --> 0:18:28.627
<v S1>go read the newsletter if you want to see my

0:18:28.627 --> 0:18:33.867
<v S1>take on this. Army is commissioning Big Tech executives as

0:18:33.907 --> 0:18:38.547
<v S1>lieutenant colonel. So for Silicon Valley executives from meta, Palantir

0:18:38.907 --> 0:18:43.266
<v S1>and OpenAI are being brought in as lieutenant colonels to

0:18:43.307 --> 0:18:47.997
<v S1>speed up the government's adoption of technology. And I'm overall

0:18:47.997 --> 0:18:52.677
<v S1>for this, but I also have my spider senses going

0:18:52.677 --> 0:18:58.596
<v S1>off in terms of like dystopia type situation. Again, I,

0:18:59.357 --> 0:19:03.956
<v S1>I see the value of Palantir. I see the value

0:19:03.956 --> 0:19:10.077
<v S1>of winning at almost any cost against China. Right? That

0:19:10.077 --> 0:19:12.436
<v S1>is why I support this type of move from the

0:19:12.436 --> 0:19:17.877
<v S1>military and why I support overall. In some ways, companies

0:19:17.877 --> 0:19:23.917
<v S1>like Palantir and Andriel and you know why these companies exist? Yes,

0:19:23.917 --> 0:19:29.077
<v S1>we need to move super fast. Unfortunately, the cultures and

0:19:29.077 --> 0:19:34.957
<v S1>the ambitions and a whole bunch of externalities often come

0:19:35.277 --> 0:19:40.077
<v S1>with moving really fast and in really ambitious ways. In

0:19:40.117 --> 0:19:43.797
<v S1>with technology companies where you're making tons of money supporting

0:19:43.797 --> 0:19:47.456
<v S1>the military. I don't think I need to spell it out.

0:19:47.696 --> 0:19:52.976
<v S1>There's possibility for harm here, right? There's possibility for harm here.

0:19:53.177 --> 0:19:57.537
<v S1>And I think we have to take that risk. I

0:19:57.537 --> 0:19:59.897
<v S1>think this is the right move to take that risk.

0:20:00.177 --> 0:20:03.137
<v S1>But holy crap, is it scary? Yes. And do we

0:20:03.137 --> 0:20:06.937
<v S1>need oversight? Yes. Do we need to be extremely careful? Yes.

0:20:06.976 --> 0:20:09.417
<v S1>Do we need to not turn our eyes away and

0:20:09.417 --> 0:20:15.737
<v S1>just hope it all works out? Absolutely. Cheap drones will

0:20:15.736 --> 0:20:21.457
<v S1>massively disrupt current large military dominance. Yeah. Israel and Ukraine

0:20:21.456 --> 0:20:26.057
<v S1>are showing that $500 drones can destroy extremely expensive military gear,

0:20:26.456 --> 0:20:31.137
<v S1>which could upend the advantage of countries like, you know, Russia,

0:20:31.137 --> 0:20:39.016
<v S1>the US. We're already seeing it with Russia in Ukraine. Uh,

0:20:39.017 --> 0:20:42.016
<v S1>big scope aside on this one. I'm curious about how

0:20:42.017 --> 0:20:45.506
<v S1>this is going to start trickling into consumer and personal security.

0:20:45.507 --> 0:20:48.827
<v S1>Like when will executive production teams all need to have

0:20:48.867 --> 0:20:53.226
<v S1>like Anti-drone tech as part of their package? I think

0:20:53.267 --> 0:20:58.347
<v S1>probably sooner rather than later. I that apple paper saying

0:20:58.387 --> 0:21:02.667
<v S1>eyes don't reason was highly flawed, and someone named Alex

0:21:02.706 --> 0:21:06.706
<v S1>Lawson says that the paper basically didn't do a good

0:21:06.706 --> 0:21:11.226
<v S1>job and it was easy to make better examples. Although

0:21:11.226 --> 0:21:15.507
<v S1>I've heard someone did a paper like this, this might

0:21:15.547 --> 0:21:18.106
<v S1>have been Alex Lawson. Actually, I don't know if it

0:21:18.107 --> 0:21:22.826
<v S1>was this paper. I heard somebody say that that whole paper,

0:21:22.827 --> 0:21:27.466
<v S1>this whole takedown paper was actually Claude generated, and it

0:21:27.466 --> 0:21:30.907
<v S1>wasn't a real paper. And it was just like, I

0:21:30.907 --> 0:21:33.787
<v S1>don't know, fake or hype or whatever, and that they

0:21:33.787 --> 0:21:36.987
<v S1>didn't expect it to blow up so much. I don't

0:21:36.986 --> 0:21:40.186
<v S1>know if it was this one, but interesting to note.

0:21:40.547 --> 0:21:42.706
<v S1>Also interesting to note, and I'm going to beat up

0:21:42.706 --> 0:21:47.686
<v S1>on myself here for a second. I don't know if

0:21:47.686 --> 0:21:51.007
<v S1>this was the paper that said that it doesn't actually

0:21:51.007 --> 0:21:55.047
<v S1>matter if I know, or it doesn't actually matter if

0:21:55.047 --> 0:21:58.167
<v S1>it was the paper or not. The fact that I

0:21:58.167 --> 0:22:03.847
<v S1>put it in the newsletter is potentially a strike against me.

0:22:04.087 --> 0:22:09.407
<v S1>Think about this. I counted as a strike against myself. Um,

0:22:09.726 --> 0:22:12.607
<v S1>the thing is, I'm not sure if I would do

0:22:12.607 --> 0:22:16.686
<v S1>it differently. It's just maybe I, I don't know. This

0:22:16.686 --> 0:22:19.167
<v S1>is weird. Okay. Because when I put something in the

0:22:19.167 --> 0:22:21.927
<v S1>newsletter and I talk about it, how much of a

0:22:21.927 --> 0:22:26.686
<v S1>high how much have I endorsed this thing and said

0:22:26.686 --> 0:22:29.246
<v S1>for sure that this is a real paper? For sure.

0:22:29.247 --> 0:22:33.407
<v S1>These are real results because I read the paper fully.

0:22:33.807 --> 0:22:35.806
<v S1>Not only that, but I looked at the all the

0:22:35.807 --> 0:22:41.407
<v S1>testing methodologies and I evaluated the data and I confirmed

0:22:41.696 --> 0:22:44.897
<v S1>that their testing was not a lie. That is a

0:22:44.936 --> 0:22:47.857
<v S1>level of depth that I cannot do. For the amount

0:22:47.857 --> 0:22:51.777
<v S1>of papers and stories that I'm doing. So what I'm

0:22:51.777 --> 0:22:55.737
<v S1>saying is it is possible for me to be duped. Um,

0:22:55.777 --> 0:22:59.137
<v S1>and this one very well could be, uh, in fact,

0:22:59.177 --> 0:23:00.417
<v S1>you know what? I'm going to click on a link

0:23:00.417 --> 0:23:07.097
<v S1>here and see if there's possible, like updates. I don't

0:23:07.097 --> 0:23:09.976
<v S1>think so. I don't think so. I don't think it applied.

0:23:09.976 --> 0:23:12.857
<v S1>It doesn't actually matter if it applied. This paper that

0:23:12.857 --> 0:23:16.496
<v S1>I included might be completely legit. And I think it is,

0:23:16.497 --> 0:23:19.537
<v S1>but it doesn't actually matter because this strike against me

0:23:19.577 --> 0:23:23.537
<v S1>still counts, right? So this is a question from me

0:23:23.537 --> 0:23:27.857
<v S1>to myself and also from you to me and from

0:23:27.857 --> 0:23:32.777
<v S1>me to you, to me. You got to watch what

0:23:32.777 --> 0:23:35.417
<v S1>people are posting, and you got to watch with how

0:23:35.456 --> 0:23:38.977
<v S1>sure that they are that that thing is actually real

0:23:40.117 --> 0:23:42.877
<v S1>And whether or not they're just using something that sounds

0:23:42.877 --> 0:23:47.316
<v S1>real to support their own opinion. This one happened to

0:23:47.357 --> 0:23:50.437
<v S1>go with my opinion. Oh, so what do you know? Magically,

0:23:50.517 --> 0:23:55.037
<v S1>I just included in the newsletter as support for my opinion. Well,

0:23:55.037 --> 0:23:57.956
<v S1>what if it turns out there was complete garbage? Well

0:23:57.956 --> 0:24:01.476
<v S1>then I'm just like anyone else who is posting a

0:24:01.476 --> 0:24:05.236
<v S1>random garbage. I would argue I'm not like that, but

0:24:05.277 --> 0:24:07.757
<v S1>I'm saying it looks kind of the same, so I

0:24:07.757 --> 0:24:11.277
<v S1>don't really care how much the difference is. So just

0:24:11.277 --> 0:24:14.037
<v S1>keep in mind. And not just for me, but for yourself.

0:24:14.677 --> 0:24:17.877
<v S1>You got to watch for whether or not evidence that's

0:24:17.877 --> 0:24:22.357
<v S1>coming in is only air quote evidence, because how much

0:24:22.476 --> 0:24:26.117
<v S1>time have you actually spent looking at the evidence, redoing

0:24:26.117 --> 0:24:31.597
<v S1>the paper yourself, you know. And so how much are

0:24:31.597 --> 0:24:37.637
<v S1>we using external validation or citations pointing to a paper

0:24:37.637 --> 0:24:43.216
<v S1>Or as support for the paper being legit. And I

0:24:43.257 --> 0:24:46.577
<v S1>think it gets more and more serious the further we go. Um,

0:24:46.617 --> 0:24:49.657
<v S1>the good news is, a big part of my personal

0:24:49.936 --> 0:24:53.897
<v S1>AI structure is going to be to find stuff like this. Uh,

0:24:53.897 --> 0:24:55.737
<v S1>I want to be able to find stuff like this

0:24:55.736 --> 0:24:59.177
<v S1>with my AI infrastructure where it's like, I don't know,

0:24:59.417 --> 0:25:01.777
<v S1>seems like they use a lot of, uh, catchy AI

0:25:01.817 --> 0:25:04.137
<v S1>terms in here, and it looks like they were really

0:25:04.177 --> 0:25:07.457
<v S1>hand-wavy with their examples. Like, I want to be able

0:25:07.456 --> 0:25:10.617
<v S1>to catch this stuff for myself. Just something to keep

0:25:10.617 --> 0:25:16.657
<v S1>in mind. OpenAI's O3 Pro is very smart, but context hungry. Agreed.

0:25:17.177 --> 0:25:21.537
<v S1>Man killed by police after spiraling into a ChatGPT driven psychosis.

0:25:22.657 --> 0:25:26.737
<v S1>Google plans to cut ties with scale AI because basically

0:25:26.736 --> 0:25:30.337
<v S1>meta bought like half of them or something. CIO wants

0:25:30.337 --> 0:25:34.897
<v S1>to clone staff as digital twins and AI agents. UC

0:25:34.897 --> 0:25:39.067
<v S1>San Diego CIO wants to extract knowledge from experienced IT

0:25:39.107 --> 0:25:45.907
<v S1>staff and create digital twins that handle routine problems. Well, yeah, obviously,

0:25:46.027 --> 0:25:50.667
<v S1>you know, you got somebody, uh, greybeard, you know, Chris Myers,

0:25:51.147 --> 0:25:54.667
<v S1>who's been at the company for 41 years, and they

0:25:54.667 --> 0:25:58.267
<v S1>know everything. And anyone who, you know, finds something broken

0:25:58.267 --> 0:26:01.867
<v S1>that nobody could fix, they all call Chris Myers. So

0:26:01.867 --> 0:26:05.586
<v S1>the CEO is like, let's go find Chris Myers. Let's

0:26:05.587 --> 0:26:10.067
<v S1>go interview him for seven weeks in a dark, padded

0:26:10.067 --> 0:26:12.987
<v S1>room and pull out all of his knowledge and put

0:26:12.986 --> 0:26:15.667
<v S1>that into an AI agent. And now you could just

0:26:15.706 --> 0:26:18.947
<v S1>ask a virtual Chris Myers. Well, obviously we need this

0:26:18.946 --> 0:26:21.347
<v S1>for everything, right? We need this for the best doctors.

0:26:21.347 --> 0:26:24.387
<v S1>We need this for the best psychiatrists. We need this

0:26:24.387 --> 0:26:27.627
<v S1>for everything. This is you know, this is the problem. When,

0:26:28.107 --> 0:26:31.987
<v S1>you know, extremely experienced people leave a company, you lose

0:26:31.986 --> 0:26:36.087
<v S1>all the knowledge that they, uh, took with them. And

0:26:36.087 --> 0:26:41.966
<v S1>unfortunately also for I, it's also knowledge that you can't

0:26:41.966 --> 0:26:47.647
<v S1>possibly extract from them efficiently, right? You can't possibly ask

0:26:47.647 --> 0:26:51.726
<v S1>enough questions to to gather their knowledge. Their knowledge is,

0:26:52.486 --> 0:26:56.887
<v S1>let's call it infinite. 41 years of knowledge essentially baked

0:26:56.887 --> 0:27:01.726
<v S1>into an AI model. That's a great analogy actually it.

0:27:02.206 --> 0:27:06.167
<v S1>How many questions do you have to ask? You know, uh,

0:27:06.647 --> 0:27:11.367
<v S1>O3 to get all of O3 knowledge out of it?

0:27:11.686 --> 0:27:15.046
<v S1>The answer is an infinite number of questions. So it

0:27:15.047 --> 0:27:18.367
<v S1>doesn't matter how much you interview Chris Myers, who's been

0:27:18.367 --> 0:27:21.686
<v S1>there for 41 years, you're not going to get enough. Right?

0:27:21.726 --> 0:27:28.327
<v S1>So so this is a serious challenge. ChatGPT dominates LLM

0:27:28.367 --> 0:27:31.927
<v S1>usage at 80%, 86% market share. I did not know

0:27:31.927 --> 0:27:35.216
<v S1>it was that high technology fabric. Summary of the massive

0:27:35.257 --> 0:27:39.297
<v S1>Google outage. Yeah. This is this is really cool. Um,

0:27:40.337 --> 0:27:42.737
<v S1>so they put out the, you know, Google put out

0:27:42.736 --> 0:27:47.617
<v S1>their their giant paper saying what happened. And when I see,

0:27:47.657 --> 0:27:50.817
<v S1>you know, a 14 page paper or whatever. And it's

0:27:50.817 --> 0:27:53.817
<v S1>about an outage and describing an outage, it's not like

0:27:53.817 --> 0:27:57.377
<v S1>deep human knowledge that I'm getting. That's where I run Extraction's.

0:27:57.736 --> 0:28:03.216
<v S1>So I've got this, um, pattern called create story explanation,

0:28:03.696 --> 0:28:09.377
<v S1>create underscore story story underscore explanation. It is one of

0:28:09.377 --> 0:28:14.337
<v S1>my favorite patterns. It explains anything at like a ninth

0:28:14.337 --> 0:28:17.897
<v S1>grade level in kind of a story format. So this happened,

0:28:17.897 --> 0:28:22.296
<v S1>then this happened, then this happened. And it's just very clear.

0:28:22.456 --> 0:28:26.097
<v S1>So I recommend checking it out if you care about

0:28:26.097 --> 0:28:28.977
<v S1>that outage, but more importantly using it against other stuff.

0:28:29.537 --> 0:28:33.797
<v S1>YouTube officially beats all other streaming platforms. In US viewership,

0:28:34.157 --> 0:28:40.437
<v S1>they have 13% of all US TV viewership. Oh, wow. Okay.

0:28:40.477 --> 0:28:44.277
<v S1>I thought it was 13% of streaming. Okay, I read

0:28:44.277 --> 0:28:52.117
<v S1>that wrong. 13% of all US TV viewership. That's insane.

0:28:55.157 --> 0:29:00.877
<v S1>That's insane. Okay, YouTube by itself, 13% of TV. Yeah,

0:29:00.917 --> 0:29:03.037
<v S1>it seems very high. I bet you that goes up

0:29:03.077 --> 0:29:07.437
<v S1>crazy amounts in the next few years. It's basically the

0:29:07.437 --> 0:29:09.837
<v S1>only TV that I watched. I was actually at a

0:29:09.837 --> 0:29:14.437
<v S1>resort yesterday in Napa, and they only had regular TV,

0:29:14.437 --> 0:29:18.036
<v S1>and it was like it was like a commercial rectangle.

0:29:19.197 --> 0:29:22.197
<v S1>All I did was watch commercials and occasionally they would

0:29:22.197 --> 0:29:26.237
<v S1>show like part of a show. Anyway, Amazon joins the

0:29:26.237 --> 0:29:34.207
<v S1>big nuclear party buying 1.2GW, uh, for AWS. tvOS 26

0:29:34.527 --> 0:29:37.847
<v S1>hints at built in camera for a new Apple TV 4K.

0:29:38.567 --> 0:29:40.727
<v S1>I wish it was an Apple TV 8-K, and I

0:29:40.727 --> 0:29:43.967
<v S1>wish it had ten Gigabit Ethernet. That's what I wish.

0:29:44.127 --> 0:29:45.887
<v S1>But I would like to see a camera because I'd

0:29:45.887 --> 0:29:49.727
<v S1>like to do FaceTime with, um, in the living room

0:29:49.727 --> 0:29:52.447
<v S1>sitting on the couch. That would be nice. I also

0:29:52.447 --> 0:29:56.527
<v S1>don't want a camera facing the living room, so I

0:29:56.527 --> 0:30:01.447
<v S1>would need one of those flip dongle cover things. Apple's

0:30:01.447 --> 0:30:05.207
<v S1>iPad OS 26 finally makes the iPad a real computer.

0:30:05.207 --> 0:30:09.967
<v S1>Everyone is talking about this. People are saying that this

0:30:10.007 --> 0:30:14.887
<v S1>actually allows you to use an iPad as a laptop,

0:30:15.407 --> 0:30:19.247
<v S1>almost like very closely. And it's kind of been universal

0:30:19.247 --> 0:30:22.087
<v S1>that people are saying, Holy crap, this is really, really good.

0:30:22.687 --> 0:30:26.007
<v S1>I have not. I don't use my iPads much. And

0:30:26.087 --> 0:30:29.947
<v S1>the reason is I just didn't like the OS. The

0:30:29.947 --> 0:30:32.347
<v S1>only thing that I use it for is reading and

0:30:32.347 --> 0:30:36.187
<v S1>drawing and sketching and doing stuff like that with like freeform.

0:30:36.667 --> 0:30:39.187
<v S1>And for that I really love it. And for reading,

0:30:39.187 --> 0:30:41.227
<v S1>I really love it. But I don't use it as

0:30:41.227 --> 0:30:44.787
<v S1>a computer because I prefer laptops. Maybe that will change

0:30:46.107 --> 0:30:48.667
<v S1>the argument that it's time to kill Siri. I did

0:30:48.667 --> 0:30:52.147
<v S1>not know that I believe this, but I definitely do.

0:30:52.187 --> 0:30:57.267
<v S1>I think once Apple fixes its AI interface, its universal

0:30:57.267 --> 0:31:00.747
<v S1>AI to life OS that I've been talking about, they

0:31:00.747 --> 0:31:05.947
<v S1>need to call it something new. Siri has too much baggage. I.

0:31:07.547 --> 0:31:08.787
<v S2>I can show them if you ask.

0:31:09.307 --> 0:31:15.067
<v S1>Hey Siri, stop the one time Siri actually listens when

0:31:15.067 --> 0:31:20.867
<v S1>I'm trying to record, um, it essentially that system does

0:31:20.867 --> 0:31:24.907
<v S1>not turn on and turn off lights reliably. It has

0:31:24.907 --> 0:31:28.277
<v S1>so many problems. It's been over ten years. It had

0:31:28.277 --> 0:31:31.597
<v S1>its attempt. It had its chances, and now it needs

0:31:31.597 --> 0:31:34.757
<v S1>a new name. I thoroughly believe this. It's just a

0:31:34.757 --> 0:31:38.397
<v S1>marketing concept. When you have enough bad baggage associated with something,

0:31:38.797 --> 0:31:41.237
<v S1>you got to flip it over. You got to retire it.

0:31:41.957 --> 0:31:45.997
<v S1>Nvidia writes off China revenue in company forecasts because, you

0:31:45.997 --> 0:31:50.157
<v S1>know it's too unpredictable. With the current administration, Waymo rides

0:31:50.157 --> 0:31:52.997
<v S1>cost more than Uber or Lyft, but people are happy

0:31:52.997 --> 0:31:56.677
<v S1>paying it so often 5 or $10 more for a

0:31:56.717 --> 0:32:00.757
<v S1>ride versus like Uber or a taxi. But people are

0:32:00.757 --> 0:32:03.277
<v S1>still paying it and they're still making money because it's

0:32:03.277 --> 0:32:08.036
<v S1>so much of a better experience. Humans. Trump ends protection

0:32:08.037 --> 0:32:12.157
<v S1>for Afghans as Congress scrambles to intervene. I'm really upset

0:32:12.157 --> 0:32:18.397
<v S1>about this, really upset that these Afghanis who had helped

0:32:18.397 --> 0:32:22.597
<v S1>the US military during the war and who cannot go

0:32:22.597 --> 0:32:26.537
<v S1>back because they are being hunted by the Taliban and

0:32:26.537 --> 0:32:32.857
<v S1>because their families are under like watch by the Taliban,

0:32:32.857 --> 0:32:36.336
<v S1>they are in grave danger. Their families are and they are.

0:32:36.537 --> 0:32:38.296
<v S1>And if they go back and try to link with

0:32:38.297 --> 0:32:41.897
<v S1>their families because they're forcibly kicked out of the US,

0:32:42.897 --> 0:32:47.977
<v S1>it is essentially damning them and their families, potentially to die.

0:32:48.857 --> 0:32:53.297
<v S1>And this is after they served and sacrificed essentially for

0:32:53.297 --> 0:32:56.817
<v S1>the US military. I do not believe we should treat

0:32:56.817 --> 0:33:03.217
<v S1>allies like that. Robin I system makes first autonomous scientific discovery.

0:33:03.217 --> 0:33:06.857
<v S1>So this is future houses. Robin I so I talked

0:33:06.857 --> 0:33:13.177
<v S1>about this story of automated, you know, science assistance. And

0:33:13.177 --> 0:33:16.017
<v S1>this is even more it's more end to end the

0:33:16.017 --> 0:33:21.737
<v S1>entire research process. So it, um, it discovered that ripasudil

0:33:22.057 --> 0:33:28.306
<v S1>could treat dry macular degeneration by orchestrating multiple specialized agents

0:33:28.307 --> 0:33:33.347
<v S1>to handle the entire research process autonomously in just 2.5 months.

0:33:34.107 --> 0:33:37.667
<v S1>And who knows how much of that is like the

0:33:37.667 --> 0:33:41.747
<v S1>entire air quotes entire research process, but supposedly it went

0:33:41.747 --> 0:33:46.546
<v S1>end to end and actually worked. So this is the

0:33:46.547 --> 0:33:49.347
<v S1>type of thing that I think is really, really exciting.

0:33:50.067 --> 0:33:55.067
<v S1>Ultra black paint might solve satellite light pollution crisis. Although

0:33:55.067 --> 0:33:57.907
<v S1>I'm curious, wouldn't you just see black dots moving through

0:33:57.947 --> 0:34:03.347
<v S1>your pictures, blocking out stars and, you know, the moon

0:34:03.347 --> 0:34:07.987
<v S1>or whatever? I guess the black dots wouldn't be as annoying.

0:34:09.867 --> 0:34:12.667
<v S1>It seems like they could still overwrite stars. If you

0:34:12.707 --> 0:34:14.907
<v S1>are trying to take a picture of the starry sky,

0:34:15.627 --> 0:34:18.787
<v S1>you might still see artifacts, but it won't be nearly

0:34:18.787 --> 0:34:22.967
<v S1>as bad as like a bright white line Him drawing

0:34:22.967 --> 0:34:28.447
<v S1>over your picture, actually multiple bright white lines. But, uh,

0:34:28.447 --> 0:34:31.727
<v S1>I wonder how possible this is, like, are we going

0:34:31.727 --> 0:34:33.727
<v S1>to pull all the ones that are up there down?

0:34:33.727 --> 0:34:37.647
<v S1>Are we going to paint the ones that are up there? Doubtful.

0:34:38.967 --> 0:34:41.287
<v S1>So this would involve painting all the new ones that

0:34:41.287 --> 0:34:46.367
<v S1>are going up, which unfortunately is many thousands. And the

0:34:46.367 --> 0:34:49.327
<v S1>Pentagon has evidently been pushing Americans to believe in UFOs

0:34:49.327 --> 0:34:53.887
<v S1>for decades. And evidently, according to this report, this is

0:34:53.887 --> 0:34:57.487
<v S1>to cover up actual secret weapons programs. So they basically

0:34:57.487 --> 0:35:00.767
<v S1>circulate this stuff on purpose to get people talking about

0:35:01.327 --> 0:35:07.967
<v S1>a red herring discovery. Fiddle ITM brings malicious traffic detection

0:35:07.967 --> 0:35:10.327
<v S1>to man of the middle proxy. Oh, I'm not going

0:35:10.327 --> 0:35:11.847
<v S1>to actually read all of these, so I'm just going

0:35:11.887 --> 0:35:14.047
<v S1>to scroll through and look for some really cool ones,

0:35:14.167 --> 0:35:17.007
<v S1>or if any are from my friends. Let's see. Boom

0:35:17.007 --> 0:35:20.407
<v S1>boom boom boom. Oh, Sam Altman's gentle singularity. You probably

0:35:20.407 --> 0:35:22.417
<v S1>want to read this one. I've also got a fabric

0:35:22.457 --> 0:35:25.297
<v S1>extracted predictions that comes out of it in the newsletter,

0:35:25.297 --> 0:35:34.137
<v S1>so check that out. And yeah, I think that's about it. Okay,

0:35:34.137 --> 0:35:36.057
<v S1>this is the end of the standard edition of the podcast,

0:35:36.057 --> 0:35:38.257
<v S1>which includes just the news items for the week to

0:35:38.297 --> 0:35:40.377
<v S1>get the rest of the episode, which includes much more

0:35:40.377 --> 0:35:43.817
<v S1>of my analysis, the ideas section, and the weekly member essay.

0:35:43.817 --> 0:35:46.497
<v S1>Please consider becoming a member. As a member, you get

0:35:46.537 --> 0:35:49.297
<v S1>access to all sorts of stuff, most importantly, access to

0:35:49.297 --> 0:35:52.457
<v S1>our extraordinary community of over a thousand brilliant and kind

0:35:52.497 --> 0:35:56.897
<v S1>people in industries like cybersecurity, AI, and the humanities. You

0:35:56.897 --> 0:35:59.577
<v S1>also get access to the UL Book Club, dedicated member

0:35:59.577 --> 0:36:02.577
<v S1>content and events, and lots more. Plus, you'll get a

0:36:02.577 --> 0:36:04.897
<v S1>dedicated podcast feed that you can put into your client

0:36:04.897 --> 0:36:07.417
<v S1>that gets you the full member edition of the podcast

0:36:07.417 --> 0:36:09.457
<v S1>that basically doesn't have this in it, and just goes

0:36:09.457 --> 0:36:11.937
<v S1>all the way through with all the different sections. So

0:36:11.977 --> 0:36:13.817
<v S1>to become a member and get all that, just head

0:36:13.817 --> 0:36:18.737
<v S1>over to Daniel Music.com. That's Daniel Miessler, and we'll see

0:36:18.737 --> 0:36:19.377
<v S1>you next time.