WEBVTT - UL NO. 446: AI Ecosystem Components, MS 0-Days, Iranian Campaign Hacks…

0:00:00.170 --> 0:00:02.930
<v S1>To zero day exploits and supply chain attacks keep you

0:00:02.930 --> 0:00:05.090
<v S1>up at night. Worry no more. You can harden your

0:00:05.090 --> 0:00:08.900
<v S1>security with threatlocker. Imagine taking a proactive deny by default

0:00:08.900 --> 0:00:13.160
<v S1>approach to cybersecurity, blocking every action, process and user unless

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:16.430
<v S1>specifically authorized by your team. Threatlocker helps you do this

0:00:16.460 --> 0:00:19.130
<v S1>and provides a full audit of every action allowed or

0:00:19.130 --> 0:00:23.450
<v S1>blocked for risk management and compliance and onboarding and operation

0:00:23.450 --> 0:00:26.540
<v S1>is fully supported by their US based support team. Stop

0:00:26.540 --> 0:00:30.740
<v S1>the exploitation of trusted applications within your organization to keep

0:00:30.740 --> 0:00:35.269
<v S1>you running efficiently and secure. Protected from ransomware. Worldwide, companies

0:00:35.270 --> 0:00:38.630
<v S1>like JetBlue trust Threatlocker to secure their data and keep

0:00:38.630 --> 0:00:41.479
<v S1>their business operations flying high. To learn more about how

0:00:41.510 --> 0:00:47.089
<v S1>Threatlocker can mitigate unknown threats and ensure compliance for your organization,

0:00:47.090 --> 0:00:56.990
<v S1>visit threatlocker Kommerell. That's Threatlocker Kommerell. Welcome to Unsupervised Learning,

0:00:57.020 --> 0:01:00.020
<v S1>a security, AI, and meaning focused podcast that looks at

0:01:00.070 --> 0:01:03.100
<v S1>how best to thrive as humans in a post AI world.

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:07.630
<v S1>It combines original ideas, analysis, and mental models to bring

0:01:07.630 --> 0:01:10.150
<v S1>not just the news, but why it matters and how

0:01:10.150 --> 0:01:17.980
<v S1>to respond. All right, welcome to unsupervised learning. This is

0:01:17.980 --> 0:01:21.699
<v S1>Daniel Miessler. All right. A few notes to start off.

0:01:21.700 --> 0:01:24.730
<v S1>All better from being sick. It was actually quite minor.

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:29.290
<v S1>Definitely the most minor time I've been sick in recent history.

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:31.720
<v S1>Would not even have known that I was sick if

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:35.980
<v S1>it wasn't for testing. So yeah. Good, good that that's over.

0:01:35.980 --> 0:01:40.509
<v S1>We migrated fabric to go. So this is really major

0:01:40.510 --> 0:01:44.530
<v S1>massive shout out to Jonathan Dunn who helped massively with this.

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:48.970
<v S1>And project still looks largely the same. But it's all

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:52.750
<v S1>go now. And if you check this out look at

0:01:52.750 --> 0:01:56.110
<v S1>the installation. Now this is just insane. Watch this. You

0:01:56.110 --> 0:01:59.630
<v S1>just run this, that's all. You run okay? That's how

0:01:59.630 --> 0:02:02.660
<v S1>you install it and it just installs and it just works.

0:02:02.660 --> 0:02:06.980
<v S1>So no more Python, no more Python dependency. Hell, you

0:02:06.980 --> 0:02:09.380
<v S1>just run this and you run setup and it works.

0:02:09.410 --> 0:02:14.420
<v S1>Now you might have to add some environmental variables or

0:02:14.450 --> 0:02:17.450
<v S1>your go install might do it for you. It depends

0:02:17.450 --> 0:02:20.270
<v S1>how you install go, but check this out. If you're

0:02:20.270 --> 0:02:23.419
<v S1>going to migrate, you just do pip x uninstall fabric

0:02:23.419 --> 0:02:25.610
<v S1>and that will get rid of the Python version. And

0:02:25.610 --> 0:02:28.670
<v S1>then you want to check your bash RC and your

0:02:28.700 --> 0:02:32.000
<v S1>zshrc and basically clean those out. If you have any

0:02:32.030 --> 0:02:34.340
<v S1>aliases or anything like that in there. And then you

0:02:34.340 --> 0:02:36.380
<v S1>do this which is the same one as above, and

0:02:36.380 --> 0:02:38.180
<v S1>you do the setup. And again you could do the

0:02:38.180 --> 0:02:43.609
<v S1>environmental variables. But watch this. Let's say you haven't messed

0:02:43.610 --> 0:02:46.370
<v S1>with it in a while, which would be blasphemy. But

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:48.440
<v S1>let's say you haven't messed with it in a while

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:50.570
<v S1>and you come back, you went on vacation. Whatever, you

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:52.910
<v S1>come back three weeks later and you want to install

0:02:52.910 --> 0:02:55.190
<v S1>this thing and you want to get the latest version,

0:02:55.190 --> 0:02:58.960
<v S1>how do you upgrade? You just run the go install again.

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:01.149
<v S1>That's all you do. You just run the go install

0:03:01.150 --> 0:03:06.820
<v S1>again and you're completely updated and upgraded. And yeah, we

0:03:06.820 --> 0:03:10.630
<v S1>kind of kind of simplified up the the Readme here.

0:03:10.660 --> 0:03:14.679
<v S1>It should be pretty clean. And yeah, just really, really

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:17.980
<v S1>happy with this. And it is so much faster. Yeah,

0:03:17.980 --> 0:03:21.550
<v S1>it is so much faster now. Yeah. I don't know

0:03:21.550 --> 0:03:25.840
<v S1>what um, I could show you here. All right. Yeah.

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.500
<v S1>That's basically, uh, getting some aphorisms. So I think I

0:03:29.500 --> 0:03:31.360
<v S1>might have used one of these. Yeah, I used one

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:35.110
<v S1>of these for the newsletter this week. Oh, actually. And

0:03:35.110 --> 0:03:37.840
<v S1>I'm recording the newsletter right now. Of course. So we'll

0:03:37.870 --> 0:03:40.390
<v S1>actually see this. This is the command that I used

0:03:40.390 --> 0:03:44.230
<v S1>to actually come up with some ideas for aphorisms. So

0:03:44.230 --> 0:03:48.280
<v S1>I just echo Red Queen concept from Ridley's book. So

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:52.330
<v S1>I knew I wanted aphorisms around that. And um, look

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:55.900
<v S1>at this. I get back some really, really cool different

0:03:55.930 --> 0:03:58.850
<v S1>aphorisms that I could potentially Potential use and depending on

0:03:58.850 --> 0:04:01.850
<v S1>the model, I was using one model and it only

0:04:01.850 --> 0:04:05.240
<v S1>gave me. Matt Ridley quotes. So that was pretty cool.

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.150
<v S1>So really depends on the model that you use. But.

0:04:08.180 --> 0:04:10.610
<v S1>I basically use fabric all the time and the go

0:04:10.610 --> 0:04:15.440
<v S1>version is just unbelievably good. So that's that. Um, highly

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:19.010
<v S1>recommend you check out this conversation between Peter Thiel and

0:04:19.010 --> 0:04:24.109
<v S1>Joe Rogan. Um, Joe's. An interesting character. He he had

0:04:24.110 --> 0:04:26.750
<v S1>Katt Williams on, and I watched as much as I

0:04:26.750 --> 0:04:29.150
<v S1>could of. That episode. And it was just like these

0:04:29.150 --> 0:04:34.490
<v S1>crazy conspiracy theories. And Katt Williams was quite serious, and

0:04:34.490 --> 0:04:37.400
<v S1>Joe was kind of pretending to be serious. But you

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:39.380
<v S1>also don't know with Joe, like, what he believes and

0:04:39.380 --> 0:04:41.720
<v S1>what he doesn't believe sometimes when he's going off on

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:44.180
<v S1>those things. But then you see him with someone like

0:04:44.180 --> 0:04:47.779
<v S1>Peter Thiel and he's way more balanced. He's like, he's

0:04:47.779 --> 0:04:50.420
<v S1>not coming up with a bunch of crazy stuff. He's

0:04:50.420 --> 0:04:53.990
<v S1>just having a normal conversation with someone he knows is smart.

0:04:53.990 --> 0:04:58.420
<v S1>And here's what's crazy. I actually thought his his description

0:04:58.420 --> 0:05:02.260
<v S1>of the future of humanity was better than Peter Thiel's. Now,

0:05:02.290 --> 0:05:06.039
<v S1>maybe just me and Joe are wrong, but Thiel seemed

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.190
<v S1>unwilling to sort of go in the direction that the

0:05:09.220 --> 0:05:12.039
<v S1>Joe was taking it, which happens to be the exact

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:14.830
<v S1>same direction that I always take it in, which is like,

0:05:14.860 --> 0:05:18.130
<v S1>this is inevitable. We have to merge with them. Basically,

0:05:18.130 --> 0:05:20.440
<v S1>it's like AI is going to get better and better,

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:22.630
<v S1>and either we're going to merge with it or we're

0:05:22.630 --> 0:05:25.780
<v S1>going to be completely replaced and it would be better

0:05:25.779 --> 0:05:29.560
<v S1>to merge. And that just becomes the new us. And

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:32.410
<v S1>that was Joe's perspective on it. And it's always been

0:05:32.410 --> 0:05:35.980
<v S1>my perspective on it. And I thought that was really interesting.

0:05:35.980 --> 0:05:39.940
<v S1>So basically you see this kind of elevated really smart

0:05:39.940 --> 0:05:43.180
<v S1>Joe on here. And then you kind of see the

0:05:43.180 --> 0:05:45.940
<v S1>opposite when he's talking to someone else. He kind of

0:05:45.970 --> 0:05:48.910
<v S1>just basically adapts to whoever he's talking to. If he's

0:05:48.910 --> 0:05:51.610
<v S1>talking to some fighter, he'll just talk about fights and

0:05:51.610 --> 0:05:53.890
<v S1>he'll just vibe out on that. If he's talking to

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:57.110
<v S1>some hunter, he'll talk about hunting like he just blends

0:05:57.110 --> 0:06:01.099
<v S1>in with whoever he kind of is empathic with whoever

0:06:01.100 --> 0:06:03.710
<v S1>he's talking to. And you might want to say, well,

0:06:03.710 --> 0:06:07.340
<v S1>that's just a gimmick and he's just trash and blah, blah, blah.

0:06:07.370 --> 0:06:11.960
<v S1>He did start podcasting, basically. He did make podcasting a

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:15.950
<v S1>thing by doing the thing that he's doing. So if

0:06:15.980 --> 0:06:18.349
<v S1>you don't like his politics or whatever, you still have

0:06:18.350 --> 0:06:22.250
<v S1>to objectively recognize that he is good at doing what

0:06:22.250 --> 0:06:25.849
<v S1>he does. And I believe it's because of this empathy thing.

0:06:25.850 --> 0:06:29.089
<v S1>So anyway, recommend checking it out. Most of the cool

0:06:29.089 --> 0:06:32.330
<v S1>thoughts were coming from teal one because he's super smart

0:06:32.330 --> 0:06:34.940
<v S1>and two because he was the guest. So that's Joe's

0:06:34.940 --> 0:06:37.940
<v S1>job is to extract that out of the guest. But

0:06:38.270 --> 0:06:43.910
<v S1>I'm I'm still trying to solve Peter Thiel because I

0:06:44.029 --> 0:06:47.450
<v S1>have always thought he was kind of like this right wing, uh,

0:06:47.450 --> 0:06:51.770
<v S1>crazy person. Uh, I really, really was mad at him

0:06:51.770 --> 0:06:56.440
<v S1>because he was supporting Trump back in what, 2020 or 2016?

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:58.960
<v S1>I can't remember. And I was like, yeah, this is

0:06:58.990 --> 0:07:01.539
<v S1>I just don't like this person because he's supporting Trump

0:07:01.540 --> 0:07:03.310
<v S1>and how could you possibly do that? So I was

0:07:03.310 --> 0:07:06.580
<v S1>very triggered by that. He has since been like, yeah,

0:07:06.580 --> 0:07:09.430
<v S1>that was a horrible mistake. Like he's way more chaotic

0:07:09.460 --> 0:07:11.440
<v S1>than I thought he was going to be. And I

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:15.010
<v S1>think he's supporting Trump again. But in a very sort

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.620
<v S1>of distant kind of way, almost kind of like Elon

0:07:17.620 --> 0:07:20.530
<v S1>seems to be doing for the purposes of same with

0:07:20.530 --> 0:07:23.950
<v S1>Andreessen and same with Horowitz for the purpose of saying,

0:07:23.950 --> 0:07:27.280
<v S1>I think the other one is worse. You're not getting

0:07:27.310 --> 0:07:31.060
<v S1>like strong endorsements from any of these. I would call

0:07:31.060 --> 0:07:34.270
<v S1>centre right people. You're not getting strong endorsements of like,

0:07:34.300 --> 0:07:38.110
<v S1>oh yeah, Trump is great, right? And I don't mean

0:07:38.110 --> 0:07:41.170
<v S1>to be talking about politics here, but I'm actually not

0:07:41.170 --> 0:07:43.750
<v S1>talking about politics. I'm talking about what it means to

0:07:43.780 --> 0:07:50.230
<v S1>be an intellectual and have opinions that are counter to Orthodoxy. Right.

0:07:50.260 --> 0:07:53.050
<v S1>So essentially what I'm saying here is I'm trying to

0:07:53.050 --> 0:07:56.930
<v S1>figure teal out And the thing that I'm realizing about

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:00.170
<v S1>teal is, and what I'm really liking about teal is

0:08:00.170 --> 0:08:03.350
<v S1>he and sort of dislike in some ways, it's like

0:08:03.350 --> 0:08:06.140
<v S1>he's not really committing to anything. He's not. I don't

0:08:06.140 --> 0:08:08.630
<v S1>see him saying, I think we should do this, which

0:08:08.630 --> 0:08:11.630
<v S1>I would really appreciate. Um, it's something that I try

0:08:11.660 --> 0:08:14.570
<v S1>to do. I try to do the objective thing, but

0:08:14.570 --> 0:08:17.300
<v S1>then come up with a direction to move in. I

0:08:17.300 --> 0:08:18.830
<v S1>feel like that's what you have to do if you

0:08:18.830 --> 0:08:21.650
<v S1>want to try to lead or to motivate or inspire.

0:08:21.650 --> 0:08:24.050
<v S1>But I feel like what teal does is just he's

0:08:24.050 --> 0:08:27.590
<v S1>just got this giant table full of hats, and he's

0:08:27.590 --> 0:08:30.260
<v S1>just always putting these different hats on. He's like, well,

0:08:30.260 --> 0:08:34.850
<v S1>let's let's steel man that let's beat that up. Let's

0:08:34.850 --> 0:08:37.010
<v S1>steel man that, let's beat that up. So he's just

0:08:37.010 --> 0:08:40.069
<v S1>like constantly looking at pros and cons of different ways

0:08:40.070 --> 0:08:43.400
<v S1>of thinking. And I think he has some general tendencies right.

0:08:43.429 --> 0:08:47.210
<v S1>He's obviously generally libertarian but he'll just straight up tell

0:08:47.210 --> 0:08:49.819
<v S1>you where he's not libertarian. And so what I like

0:08:49.850 --> 0:08:52.970
<v S1>about him is he's not fitting into any sort of

0:08:52.970 --> 0:08:56.140
<v S1>right wing bolt. Right. A lot of right people, right

0:08:56.140 --> 0:08:58.540
<v S1>wing people probably think he is. But if you actually

0:08:58.540 --> 0:09:01.750
<v S1>listen to him, he's not. He's actually going down his

0:09:01.750 --> 0:09:06.100
<v S1>own path from first principles. From all this reading, if

0:09:06.100 --> 0:09:09.490
<v S1>you watch his conversation with Tyler Cowen. Oh my God,

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:11.980
<v S1>I mean, it's like the Joe Rogan one times 1000

0:09:11.980 --> 0:09:14.979
<v S1>because they are just riffing on all this history and

0:09:14.980 --> 0:09:17.469
<v S1>all this different stuff that they're talking about, and they're

0:09:17.470 --> 0:09:20.020
<v S1>just jumping from one topic to another. And so he's

0:09:20.020 --> 0:09:23.590
<v S1>using all that knowledge to walk his own path using

0:09:23.620 --> 0:09:27.340
<v S1>first principles. And sometimes that takes him like center right.

0:09:27.370 --> 0:09:30.520
<v S1>Sometimes that takes him center left. I imagine sometimes he

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.970
<v S1>goes more extreme left and more extreme right. But I

0:09:33.970 --> 0:09:36.819
<v S1>don't think he honestly cares about left and right. I

0:09:36.820 --> 0:09:40.390
<v S1>think what he cares about is first principles and and

0:09:40.390 --> 0:09:43.599
<v S1>studying and learning and trying to just constantly improve his

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:46.809
<v S1>models so that he can have all these different hats.

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:49.390
<v S1>Because ultimately, I think he's an investor, and I think

0:09:49.420 --> 0:09:51.790
<v S1>ultimately his whole game is trying to figure out how

0:09:51.790 --> 0:09:55.630
<v S1>to predict the future to some degree, some limited degree. Oh,

0:09:55.630 --> 0:09:58.990
<v S1>that's the other thing. He's extremely humble. He's extremely cautious.

0:09:59.020 --> 0:10:00.580
<v S1>They'll be like, hey, what do you think of this?

0:10:00.610 --> 0:10:03.459
<v S1>What's the future going to be? He's like, yeah, nobody knows.

0:10:03.460 --> 0:10:06.460
<v S1>It's a dumb question. So it's like the opposite of

0:10:06.460 --> 0:10:09.670
<v S1>the right. Okay. You get a typical right wing pundit.

0:10:09.670 --> 0:10:12.670
<v S1>So let me give you a perfect example. Peter Thiel

0:10:12.670 --> 0:10:17.830
<v S1>is the absolute opposite from Tucker Carlson. Tucker Carlson is

0:10:17.830 --> 0:10:22.059
<v S1>extremely sure about things and extremely wrong. And Peter Thiel

0:10:22.059 --> 0:10:25.960
<v S1>is extremely unsure about things and tends to be very right.

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:29.560
<v S1>And he's very cautious and he's just constantly consuming and learning.

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.890
<v S1>And it's just yeah, so I'm still trying to lock

0:10:32.890 --> 0:10:35.439
<v S1>in on Peter Thiel. I'm still trying to look for

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:38.800
<v S1>skeletons or look for biases, but I feel like he's

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:42.100
<v S1>a pretty good model of how to learn about the world,

0:10:42.130 --> 0:10:43.809
<v S1>as far as I can tell. So far, I've got

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:47.320
<v S1>like a 75% read. I would love to see if

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:50.710
<v S1>anyone has a different read, or has knowledge that can

0:10:50.740 --> 0:10:54.370
<v S1>sort of shape my model of him based on this,

0:10:54.370 --> 0:10:56.559
<v S1>and I bought one of those mini libraries to put

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:58.300
<v S1>up in my neighborhood. I don't know if you've ever

0:10:58.300 --> 0:11:02.140
<v S1>seen these. I've seen them all over, definitely in Palo Alto.

0:11:02.140 --> 0:11:04.600
<v S1>So if you drive through one of these neighborhoods in

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:08.110
<v S1>Palo Alto, like kind of near Stanford, um, not Atherton,

0:11:08.110 --> 0:11:11.110
<v S1>but one of the nicer neighborhoods in Palo Alto, you'll see,

0:11:11.140 --> 0:11:13.780
<v S1>like these little it looks like a birdhouse, kind of.

0:11:13.809 --> 0:11:16.870
<v S1>But it's like on the curb, like right against the street.

0:11:16.870 --> 0:11:19.750
<v S1>And it says like mini library or community library or

0:11:19.750 --> 0:11:22.510
<v S1>whatever on it. And it's just like this little birdhouse thing,

0:11:22.510 --> 0:11:24.590
<v S1>except for when you open it up. It's like 1

0:11:24.590 --> 0:11:28.090
<v S1>or 2 shelves of books. And the idea is you

0:11:28.090 --> 0:11:30.309
<v S1>take a book, you just walk away. You just walk

0:11:30.309 --> 0:11:32.319
<v S1>away with it. Maybe you never bring it back, but

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:35.890
<v S1>the idea is community karma. So yes, you do bring

0:11:35.890 --> 0:11:37.750
<v S1>it back. Or maybe you bring back an extra book.

0:11:37.750 --> 0:11:40.179
<v S1>So it's just like this. It's a combination of community

0:11:40.179 --> 0:11:44.829
<v S1>with books. Love it. Obviously. All right. So my work

0:11:44.860 --> 0:11:48.309
<v S1>got this new piece on the four components of what's

0:11:48.309 --> 0:11:52.350
<v S1>going to make models. When I models win and it's

0:11:52.350 --> 0:11:55.980
<v S1>basically I'll go into it here. It's basically the model itself,

0:11:55.980 --> 0:12:00.210
<v S1>post-training internal tooling and then agents. And I'm actually going

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.910
<v S1>to add some extra stuff here. But these are the four.

0:12:02.940 --> 0:12:05.100
<v S1>And then the summary is just the four of those.

0:12:05.100 --> 0:12:08.640
<v S1>So we should start thinking about top models as model

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.820
<v S1>ecosystems instead of just models. Because it's not just the

0:12:11.820 --> 0:12:14.910
<v S1>neural net weights doing the work. There are four main components.

0:12:14.910 --> 0:12:18.480
<v S1>And the company that wins the AI model wars will

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:20.790
<v S1>need to excel at all four of these. Not just

0:12:20.790 --> 0:12:23.160
<v S1>spending lots of money to have the neural net with

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:26.130
<v S1>the most parameters. So that's that piece. Next one here

0:12:26.130 --> 0:12:29.160
<v S1>is the link between free will and LLM denial. That

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:32.820
<v S1>one's a bit deep and esoteric. And if you don't

0:12:32.820 --> 0:12:35.220
<v S1>like free will it won't interest you. So I'm going

0:12:35.250 --> 0:12:38.280
<v S1>to skip that one. Okay. Security. Microsoft just released a

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:42.929
<v S1>bunch of patches, uh, 90 security flaws, including ten zero days,

0:12:42.929 --> 0:12:47.010
<v S1>six of which being actively exploited. I think the biggest one.

0:12:47.010 --> 0:12:51.100
<v S1>If I'm not incorrect about this is Wasn't there a

0:12:51.100 --> 0:12:54.670
<v S1>really nasty IPv6 one? Just pull this up real quick.

0:12:54.700 --> 0:13:01.870
<v S1>IPv6 Microsoft repeatedly sent IPv6 packets include specially crafted packets

0:13:01.870 --> 0:13:07.510
<v S1>to windows machine enable remote code execution. Yeah, so pretty nasty.

0:13:07.510 --> 0:13:10.360
<v S1>And I think it's before the firewall. So somebody was

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.630
<v S1>saying it might have been Marcus Hutchins saying this, who

0:13:13.630 --> 0:13:15.699
<v S1>he got to meet in person for the first time

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:19.750
<v S1>after talking to him for a number of years just online,

0:13:19.750 --> 0:13:22.630
<v S1>but got to meet him at this crater meetup that

0:13:22.630 --> 0:13:25.809
<v S1>we do in Vegas. Probably got Covid there. Lots of

0:13:25.809 --> 0:13:28.030
<v S1>people probably gave me Covid there. Lots of people probably

0:13:28.030 --> 0:13:30.640
<v S1>got Covid there. Anyway. Got to meet him in person

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:33.940
<v S1>there in Vegas. That was cool. But I think he

0:13:33.940 --> 0:13:37.960
<v S1>might have been saying somewhere that basically the IPv6 packets

0:13:37.990 --> 0:13:40.720
<v S1>come in and don't even make it to the firewall.

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:44.980
<v S1>It just goes straight through and gets parsed and produces

0:13:44.980 --> 0:13:49.330
<v S1>the ability to create RC. So that's great. Uh Russian

0:13:49.350 --> 0:13:54.420
<v S1>cyber spies from the FSB. Cold War. Trail. Cold war's trail.

0:13:54.420 --> 0:13:57.870
<v S1>Cold wastrel. Who knows how to say that? Been running

0:13:57.870 --> 0:14:01.620
<v S1>a massive phishing campaign dubbed River of fish, targeting U.S.

0:14:01.620 --> 0:14:07.170
<v S1>and European entities since 2022, going after high risk individuals, NGOs,

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:10.980
<v S1>media outlets, government people. And the Pentagon is talking about

0:14:10.980 --> 0:14:13.890
<v S1>their plan to flood the Taiwan Strait with thousands of

0:14:13.890 --> 0:14:17.040
<v S1>drones in the event of a Chinese invasion. So this guy,

0:14:17.070 --> 0:14:21.750
<v S1>Admiral Sam Samuel Paparo, described the strategy as creating an

0:14:21.750 --> 0:14:26.490
<v S1>unmanned hellscape to delay Chinese forces. Why are we talking

0:14:26.490 --> 0:14:29.730
<v S1>about this? Unless this is part of the strategy to

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:31.739
<v S1>make them think we're doing this, and then they try

0:14:31.770 --> 0:14:34.740
<v S1>to adjust for that. But that's not actually what we're doing. Like,

0:14:34.770 --> 0:14:37.830
<v S1>are we playing games here? Like what exactly. Why are

0:14:37.830 --> 0:14:41.370
<v S1>we talking about this? Evidently, it's not meant to be

0:14:41.370 --> 0:14:45.930
<v S1>useful as a surprise because it's no longer a surprise. Whatever.

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:47.910
<v S1>That'd be cool if it was like, yeah, we're not

0:14:47.910 --> 0:14:49.720
<v S1>really going to do that. We're just going to make

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:52.990
<v S1>them do a bunch of anti-drone stuff. And actually our

0:14:52.990 --> 0:14:55.900
<v S1>strategy is going to be completely different. Whatever. We'd like

0:14:55.900 --> 0:14:58.990
<v S1>to know more. Someone published a timeline of his research

0:14:59.020 --> 0:15:04.600
<v S1>on offensive AI agents, three distinct types of AI offensive systems.

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:10.570
<v S1>SolarWinds patched a critical Deserialization vulnerability 9.8 on the Richter scale.

0:15:10.570 --> 0:15:13.480
<v S1>Iranian banks have been hit by a massive cyber attack,

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.900
<v S1>probably tied to Israel. I'm just guessing Trump shared a

0:15:16.900 --> 0:15:20.530
<v S1>fake image. Oh man, I didn't put the link. I

0:15:20.530 --> 0:15:22.930
<v S1>just got an email about this. Didn't put the link.

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:26.860
<v S1>Oh man. Whatever fake image of Harris speaking at a

0:15:26.860 --> 0:15:29.710
<v S1>Communist event. All right, let me let me find this thing.

0:15:29.740 --> 0:15:35.920
<v S1>Trump share. Yeah, look at that. Look at that. I mean,

0:15:35.950 --> 0:15:38.200
<v S1>does anyone think she would actually go to an event

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:40.869
<v S1>like that? Well, first of all, yeah, this this is

0:15:40.870 --> 0:15:43.600
<v S1>what I said actually in the piece. Right. Um, one

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.660
<v S1>lots of people will believe it's real. And two, current

0:15:46.690 --> 0:15:49.650
<v S1>tech can already make more believable ones than this. So

0:15:49.650 --> 0:15:52.380
<v S1>this isn't the actual problem. The actual problem is when

0:15:52.380 --> 0:15:55.710
<v S1>it gets much worse. Oh, here's the other one that

0:15:55.710 --> 0:16:01.560
<v S1>they were sharing. Watch this one. Trump. Share. Taylor Swift

0:16:01.590 --> 0:16:05.100
<v S1>should be enough, right? No links. Yeah. Look at this.

0:16:05.130 --> 0:16:07.680
<v S1>Look at this. So we've been talking about for years.

0:16:07.710 --> 0:16:09.660
<v S1>I went looking for this post where I first started

0:16:09.690 --> 0:16:12.480
<v S1>talking about this. I couldn't find it. So. Beehive, fix

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.870
<v S1>your search, please. Uh, couldn't find it with Google either, so.

0:16:16.140 --> 0:16:19.800
<v S1>Kind of annoying. Anyway, I wrote about basically deep fakes

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:22.109
<v S1>becoming an issue because we're not going to be able

0:16:22.110 --> 0:16:24.960
<v S1>to believe things. It's so obvious now. It's not even

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:28.020
<v S1>a good post, but it was very early. This was

0:16:28.020 --> 0:16:31.650
<v S1>like two years ago. Um, I was talking about this. Um,

0:16:31.650 --> 0:16:36.870
<v S1>but anyway, everyone knows now, uh, and here is the actual.

0:16:36.930 --> 0:16:40.530
<v S1>It's just now starting to matter. Okay, look at this picture.

0:16:40.530 --> 0:16:43.800
<v S1>The top right one that looks like an actual, like event.

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.080
<v S1>This person's got his phone. He's got his foot sticking

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:50.380
<v S1>out That looks super real. Super real Swifties for Trump.

0:16:50.410 --> 0:16:53.080
<v S1>Now you don't be funny is if that was if

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:56.620
<v S1>that was actually real like some. Okay the bottom left

0:16:56.620 --> 0:17:00.520
<v S1>definitely not real. Okay. They're probably none of these are

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:03.250
<v S1>probably real. Just to be very clear about, you know,

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:07.240
<v S1>disinformation or whatever. But, um, the point is you can

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:09.490
<v S1>make these. Oh, yeah. This bottom right one also looks

0:17:09.490 --> 0:17:12.940
<v S1>super real. The bottom left one does not because that

0:17:12.940 --> 0:17:17.560
<v S1>Swifties for Trump looks like two clear like the white

0:17:17.590 --> 0:17:20.679
<v S1>of the text just looks a little bit too artificial.

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:24.220
<v S1>But this one Swifties for Trump. It's got shadow on it.

0:17:24.220 --> 0:17:27.160
<v S1>The T is hidden because it's on the other side

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:30.010
<v S1>of her body, so that one looks real. It's actually

0:17:30.010 --> 0:17:33.640
<v S1>the same person as this. Honestly, these two look really,

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:37.480
<v S1>really good that that would trick basically anybody, including me

0:17:37.510 --> 0:17:40.660
<v S1>right now. So the point is, these are getting so

0:17:40.660 --> 0:17:43.929
<v S1>good that you can't tell the difference between reality and

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:47.820
<v S1>doesn't really matter for this. Right now. This one maybe

0:17:47.820 --> 0:17:50.910
<v S1>kind of does. The question is what happens when it's

0:17:50.910 --> 0:17:54.870
<v S1>a thing that really matters? Like did a crime actually occur? Um,

0:17:54.869 --> 0:17:59.580
<v S1>who is the assailant? Evidence of something bad happening. Where

0:17:59.609 --> 0:18:03.240
<v S1>where we're going to use pictures or video as part

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:05.580
<v S1>of the evidence for that crime. That's when it starts

0:18:05.580 --> 0:18:09.600
<v S1>to really, really matter. And also for politics as well. Um,

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:14.129
<v S1>the worst possible one is, is like the absolute worst

0:18:14.130 --> 0:18:19.980
<v S1>one is where you have, um, a video of Trump saying,

0:18:20.010 --> 0:18:22.439
<v S1>you know, it looks like we're going to have to

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:26.820
<v S1>attack Russia, pre-emptive nuclear strike. And it's very believable. And

0:18:26.820 --> 0:18:29.880
<v S1>it freaks somebody out and that person freaks out Putin

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.640
<v S1>and something goes off or something similar to that. Maybe

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:35.700
<v S1>it's not a nuclear war, but something where there's an

0:18:35.700 --> 0:18:39.090
<v S1>actual threat being made and it causes the other person

0:18:39.090 --> 0:18:43.440
<v S1>to respond. So it's a trigger point for kinetic action

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:48.350
<v S1>that that's pretty serious and we have the tech now

0:18:48.470 --> 0:18:51.469
<v S1>to be able to do that. Not everyone could do it,

0:18:51.470 --> 0:18:54.800
<v S1>but it's getting pretty close, and it's much easier to

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:57.170
<v S1>do with images than it is for video. But the

0:18:57.170 --> 0:19:00.410
<v S1>point is, this is getting very, very real. No longer

0:19:00.410 --> 0:19:04.580
<v S1>theoretical Iranian hacking group Abt 42 has targeted both Trump

0:19:04.580 --> 0:19:10.460
<v S1>and Biden campaigns, according to Google's Tag group. They look

0:19:10.490 --> 0:19:14.479
<v S1>like they work for Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps, which is

0:19:14.510 --> 0:19:16.820
<v S1>like their elite group. And it looks like they targeted

0:19:16.820 --> 0:19:21.830
<v S1>both campaigns. But only Trump's campaign had sensitive files leaked.

0:19:22.130 --> 0:19:24.920
<v S1>Kind of interesting. I mean, maybe there was nothing there

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:27.949
<v S1>on the Democratic side. Maybe, I don't know, why are

0:19:27.950 --> 0:19:33.619
<v S1>they why are they anti-Trump? Um, oh, maybe. Maybe because

0:19:33.650 --> 0:19:38.270
<v S1>Trump is about to massively support Israel and massively crush Iran.

0:19:38.390 --> 0:19:41.360
<v S1>That would be a good explanation. Trump corroborated this by

0:19:41.390 --> 0:19:44.910
<v S1>pointing the finger at Iran for hacking his campaign, praising

0:19:44.910 --> 0:19:48.120
<v S1>the FBI's investigation into the breach. This is one thing

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:51.300
<v S1>that I like decently about Trump when he does it,

0:19:51.300 --> 0:19:53.700
<v S1>and it's only because the bar is so low. But

0:19:53.700 --> 0:19:56.400
<v S1>if he gets on a phone call with the FBI

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:59.190
<v S1>and the FBI is like, yes sir, no sir, blah, blah, blah,

0:19:59.220 --> 0:20:01.409
<v S1>you know, we did this or we did that. If

0:20:01.410 --> 0:20:03.990
<v S1>he just got done railing against the FBI for like

0:20:03.990 --> 0:20:06.629
<v S1>the last six months and he has that call, he'll

0:20:06.630 --> 0:20:08.310
<v S1>go and talk to the press and be like, yeah,

0:20:08.310 --> 0:20:11.040
<v S1>I just had a great call with the FBI. Very professional,

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:13.890
<v S1>very cool. It's like the thing that happened most recently

0:20:13.890 --> 0:20:16.350
<v S1>is like his view of reality, but at least he's

0:20:16.350 --> 0:20:19.440
<v S1>willing to, like, be positive if a positive thing happened.

0:20:19.470 --> 0:20:21.449
<v S1>I mean, I can't believe I'm saying that as a

0:20:21.450 --> 0:20:26.400
<v S1>positive thing, since that's called normal. China linked cyber spies

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:30.780
<v S1>have infected dozens of Russian government and IT sector computers

0:20:30.780 --> 0:20:35.040
<v S1>with backdoors and trojans since late July, according to Kaspersky. So,

0:20:35.070 --> 0:20:38.610
<v S1>China v Russia scammers are targeting young Chinese job seekers

0:20:38.609 --> 0:20:42.720
<v S1>in a tough economy. AI and tech grok chatbot now

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:45.830
<v S1>lets users create images from text prompts and publish them

0:20:45.830 --> 0:20:49.490
<v S1>to X, leading to chaotic results like Barack Obama doing

0:20:49.490 --> 0:20:52.640
<v S1>cocaine and Donald Trump in a Nazi uniform. Yeah, the

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:56.389
<v S1>one that I saw. Yeah, I wrote this right here. Um,

0:20:56.390 --> 0:20:59.450
<v S1>the one I saw was Trump basically had his arm

0:20:59.450 --> 0:21:02.870
<v S1>around Ellen, and Ellen was pregnant. And Ellen posted that

0:21:02.869 --> 0:21:04.640
<v S1>and he was like, live by the sword, die by

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:09.350
<v S1>the sword. Yeah. Uh, okay. Got someone who's on a

0:21:09.350 --> 0:21:12.800
<v S1>mission to make you love reading again. So he's using

0:21:12.830 --> 0:21:17.090
<v S1>AI tools like ChatGPT to recommend books, understand deeper themes,

0:21:17.090 --> 0:21:22.580
<v S1>and novels like Hermann Hesse's Siddhartha, and create actionable strategies

0:21:22.580 --> 0:21:26.780
<v S1>from business books like Alex Hormozi $100 million Offers. I've

0:21:26.780 --> 0:21:29.660
<v S1>already got that built into fabric. Um, I've got one

0:21:29.660 --> 0:21:33.860
<v S1>called create $100 million offer. You give it any product,

0:21:33.859 --> 0:21:37.790
<v S1>concept or idea and it'll build you a hormozi offer

0:21:37.790 --> 0:21:40.580
<v S1>based on it. Comedians are increasingly using AI to help

0:21:40.580 --> 0:21:44.609
<v S1>write jokes and brainstorm ideas with mixed results. I think

0:21:44.609 --> 0:21:48.240
<v S1>this is as big or bigger, not bigger as big,

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:50.820
<v S1>maybe as the Turing test in terms of the importance

0:21:50.820 --> 0:21:54.510
<v S1>of AI progress. Because if I can write a full

0:21:54.510 --> 0:21:59.460
<v S1>comedy set and make humans laugh, that is massively huge.

0:21:59.460 --> 0:22:03.270
<v S1>Even better if it can be deepfaked performed right. So

0:22:03.270 --> 0:22:06.900
<v S1>it's actually AI writing it and AI performing it, and

0:22:06.900 --> 0:22:10.920
<v S1>all the human did was tell an agent to write

0:22:10.950 --> 0:22:15.659
<v S1>a comedy set around a topic. Okay, that is this.

0:22:15.660 --> 0:22:20.370
<v S1>This is an unbelievable metric, okay, a milestone metric. So basically,

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:24.300
<v S1>here's the test. Can I give an agent or any model?

0:22:24.300 --> 0:22:28.020
<v S1>Let's say, for example, I hand this to I write

0:22:28.050 --> 0:22:33.330
<v S1>a comedy sketch skit or set around, um, good coffee

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:37.679
<v S1>versus bad coffee or how baristas don't care about you

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:40.889
<v S1>or how customer services people don't care about you. Do

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:44.030
<v S1>write a 20 minute set just about this topic. Okay.

0:22:44.060 --> 0:22:46.700
<v S1>So now I want to see on a screen either

0:22:46.700 --> 0:22:50.030
<v S1>a stand up view or a face view. Yeah. A

0:22:50.030 --> 0:22:51.800
<v S1>stand up view would be better. Actually, I want to

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:53.689
<v S1>see a stage. I want to see a microphone. I

0:22:53.690 --> 0:22:56.750
<v S1>want to see a person standing there talking. And I

0:22:56.750 --> 0:22:58.490
<v S1>want to see them moving. I want to see them

0:22:58.490 --> 0:23:01.550
<v S1>moving their hands. I want to see them gesturing. A full,

0:23:01.550 --> 0:23:05.060
<v S1>complete deepfake of the content that they wrote. And this

0:23:05.060 --> 0:23:07.160
<v S1>has to be funny. Okay. And it doesn't even have

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:09.139
<v S1>to be, like, the funniest thing. It doesn't have to

0:23:09.140 --> 0:23:12.770
<v S1>be Dave Chappelle. It has to be decently funny. Like

0:23:12.770 --> 0:23:16.160
<v S1>good enough to get gigs on a comedy tour. And

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:18.350
<v S1>if you've been on a comedy, tours like The Bar

0:23:18.350 --> 0:23:21.980
<v S1>is not super high for the average comic that I

0:23:21.980 --> 0:23:24.230
<v S1>don't know what I skeptics are going to say to that.

0:23:24.230 --> 0:23:26.149
<v S1>And I would say I'm going to I'm going to

0:23:26.150 --> 0:23:29.000
<v S1>call it right now. We are in the middle of 2024.

0:23:29.030 --> 0:23:34.580
<v S1>I'm going to call that as 2025, 2026 at the latest.

0:23:34.580 --> 0:23:40.129
<v S1>Full deepfake integration 2026 at the latest. So both 2026,

0:23:40.130 --> 0:23:42.840
<v S1>both in 2026. That's two years from now, a year

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:44.880
<v S1>and a half from now, we will have the ability

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:48.240
<v S1>to have a Deepfaked comic, right? A funny set and

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:50.370
<v S1>perform it in a way that if a regular person

0:23:50.369 --> 0:23:52.920
<v S1>who enjoys comedy watches it, they'll be like, yeah, that's

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:56.220
<v S1>pretty funny. That's decently funny. Now, could they get their

0:23:56.220 --> 0:24:00.150
<v S1>own Netflix Netflix special based on that content? That would

0:24:00.150 --> 0:24:02.370
<v S1>be like the top, top tier. But keep in mind

0:24:02.369 --> 0:24:06.510
<v S1>how few comics actually have Netflix specials. So yeah. Interesting.

0:24:06.540 --> 0:24:09.419
<v S1>What did I say? 27. No, I said 26. Yeah.

0:24:09.450 --> 0:24:11.909
<v S1>All right. I'm holding myself to that. San Francisco is

0:24:11.910 --> 0:24:14.490
<v S1>looking to ban software that critics claim is being used

0:24:14.490 --> 0:24:20.280
<v S1>to artificially inflate rates, so it allegedly helps landlords coordinate

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:24.060
<v S1>rent increases. You might be over using vim visual mode.

0:24:24.060 --> 0:24:26.399
<v S1>I've been worried about this for quite some time, actually.

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:29.129
<v S1>Oh yeah, instead of doing GG takes you to the

0:24:29.130 --> 0:24:33.690
<v S1>top V which switched to visual mode, and then capital G,

0:24:33.869 --> 0:24:37.050
<v S1>which goes to the bottom of the file. Instead you

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:41.300
<v S1>do GG quote plus y Why capital? That's a lot

0:24:41.330 --> 0:24:43.580
<v S1>of characters, man. Anyway, I'm going to try to learn

0:24:43.580 --> 0:24:45.649
<v S1>how to do this and do it more with normal

0:24:45.650 --> 0:24:48.889
<v S1>commands instead of visual. All right humans. We're going to

0:24:48.890 --> 0:24:53.840
<v S1>have driver's licenses in the Apple Wallet before too long,

0:24:53.869 --> 0:24:56.359
<v S1>and you'll be able to go through LAX and SFO.

0:24:56.390 --> 0:25:00.260
<v S1>China's manufacturers are facing a financial crisis, with many going

0:25:00.260 --> 0:25:03.679
<v S1>bankrupt due to a combination of weak demand, rising costs

0:25:03.710 --> 0:25:07.460
<v S1>and increased competition. Scientists at Fermilab have detected the first

0:25:07.460 --> 0:25:13.189
<v S1>neutrinos using a prototype detector. Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment. Dune.

0:25:13.190 --> 0:25:15.560
<v S1>You got to land. You got to land. The acronym.

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.830
<v S1>They landed it. Venture capitalists aren't looking for nice founders.

0:25:18.830 --> 0:25:22.760
<v S1>They want risk takers. Nate Silver highlights that 70% of

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:29.720
<v S1>the billionaires on the 2023 Forbes 400 list are self-made, 70% self-made,

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:33.710
<v S1>modest backgrounds. So I saw Scott Galloway talking to Nate

0:25:33.710 --> 0:25:37.220
<v S1>Silver about this. I really love this idea of basically

0:25:37.220 --> 0:25:39.050
<v S1>Nate Silver was talking about this thing I've been talking

0:25:39.050 --> 0:25:42.580
<v S1>about for a while, which is they want crazy religious

0:25:42.580 --> 0:25:45.640
<v S1>people who are just like, yep, I have no life whatsoever.

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:48.040
<v S1>I will sleep under my desk. That is what people

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:50.859
<v S1>are looking for. They're looking for a crazy vision. And

0:25:50.859 --> 0:25:54.040
<v S1>when I say people, I'm talking about VCs and also

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:57.429
<v S1>startup founders who are hiring people. And I would argue

0:25:57.430 --> 0:25:59.919
<v S1>this is the future of all work. The future of

0:25:59.920 --> 0:26:02.710
<v S1>all work is you only hire these people. You only

0:26:02.710 --> 0:26:07.449
<v S1>hire the most talented and the most crazy dedicated because

0:26:07.450 --> 0:26:10.870
<v S1>to hire a worker who just does normal work, they

0:26:10.869 --> 0:26:14.320
<v S1>show up 9 to 5 and they do average level work.

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:17.590
<v S1>That's called AI except for it doesn't go home, it

0:26:17.590 --> 0:26:21.070
<v S1>doesn't commute, it doesn't draw a salary, and you can

0:26:21.070 --> 0:26:24.939
<v S1>upgrade it instantly. Okay, so 9 to 5 workers who

0:26:24.940 --> 0:26:28.930
<v S1>just do average work that gets replaced. The only people

0:26:28.930 --> 0:26:31.480
<v S1>I think that people are going to want going forward.

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:34.000
<v S1>And this is an exaggeration. There's still going to be

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:36.670
<v S1>a need for some some of the other type. But

0:26:36.670 --> 0:26:40.280
<v S1>I would say in general, the motion towards is towards

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:44.420
<v S1>this dedicated zealot crazy person which happens to be young,

0:26:44.450 --> 0:26:48.649
<v S1>happens to be male, usually um, and just obsessed with tech,

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:52.040
<v S1>obsessed with building things, obsessed with like. And you got

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:55.130
<v S1>all sorts of hangups around this. You got God complexes,

0:26:55.130 --> 0:26:59.180
<v S1>you got narcissism, you got like, just ambition. Just all

0:26:59.180 --> 0:27:02.990
<v S1>sorts of crazy testosterone powered things going on there. And

0:27:02.990 --> 0:27:07.040
<v S1>the upside is taking risk. They're like, oh yeah, just

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:09.170
<v S1>I'll take all my money and put it into this

0:27:09.170 --> 0:27:12.320
<v S1>idea and sleep under my desk for four years. And

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:14.540
<v S1>you don't see many older people doing that. You don't

0:27:14.540 --> 0:27:17.810
<v S1>see many women doing that. There are some, uh, a

0:27:17.810 --> 0:27:20.270
<v S1>decent amount, right? If you look at the entire world,

0:27:20.270 --> 0:27:23.929
<v S1>but in general, it starts to look like one particular demographic.

0:27:23.930 --> 0:27:27.770
<v S1>And silver is basically saying, yeah, that's what gets it done.

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:31.129
<v S1>That's what VCs are looking for and not people who

0:27:31.130 --> 0:27:35.660
<v S1>are cautious. And I find that really interesting. This negativity,

0:27:35.660 --> 0:27:39.880
<v S1>this risk acceptance. It feels very Atlas Shrugged to me,

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:42.700
<v S1>which is kind of awesome and kind of gross for

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:46.600
<v S1>different reasons, but I think that's one of the premises

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:50.109
<v S1>of Atlas Shrugged is that the risk takers are the

0:27:50.109 --> 0:27:52.840
<v S1>ones who get the benefits, like the awesome people are

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:55.120
<v S1>the ones who are actually building. And I feel like

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:58.240
<v S1>Silicon Valley is based around this entire concept, is that

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:00.369
<v S1>those people who sleep under the desk, they are the

0:28:00.369 --> 0:28:03.639
<v S1>special people, and of course, very few of them actually succeed,

0:28:03.820 --> 0:28:07.510
<v S1>you know, especially the first time. But anyway, really cool

0:28:07.510 --> 0:28:10.060
<v S1>concept coming out of Nate Silver. And by the way,

0:28:10.060 --> 0:28:13.180
<v S1>he's the one who did FiveThirtyEight, although he does not

0:28:13.180 --> 0:28:16.150
<v S1>run it anymore, someone else is running it and they're

0:28:16.150 --> 0:28:20.890
<v S1>actually competing using Nate Silver's brand of FiveThirtyEight. So do

0:28:20.890 --> 0:28:23.410
<v S1>not tie yourself to a brand and then sell it,

0:28:23.410 --> 0:28:25.750
<v S1>because everyone will think you still have it. Growing trend

0:28:25.780 --> 0:28:29.500
<v S1>of Gen Z men becoming NEETs not in employment, education

0:28:29.500 --> 0:28:33.100
<v S1>or training. 1 in 5 young men under 25 unemployed

0:28:33.100 --> 0:28:36.910
<v S1>and not actively looking for work, 1 in 5 unemployed

0:28:36.910 --> 0:28:40.070
<v S1>and not looking for work. What the f is going on?

0:28:40.100 --> 0:28:43.130
<v S1>Slow is smooth. Smooth is fast. I've always loved this.

0:28:43.370 --> 0:28:46.700
<v S1>I'm ex-military myself. I've heard this a million times. It's

0:28:46.700 --> 0:28:49.550
<v S1>not just Navy Seals. Lots of military talk about this,

0:28:49.550 --> 0:28:52.790
<v S1>but cool idea. No one wants kids anymore. And it's

0:28:52.790 --> 0:28:56.690
<v S1>not you. Cool video talks about declining birth rates, touching

0:28:56.690 --> 0:29:01.430
<v S1>on economic pressures, changing societal values, and personal choices. Imposter

0:29:01.430 --> 0:29:05.720
<v S1>syndrome often stems from systemic biases, not just self-doubt, and

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:10.760
<v S1>highlights that many women experience this due to real exclusionary practices,

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:13.670
<v S1>which is 100% true. Guy got fired and replaced by

0:29:13.670 --> 0:29:17.330
<v S1>AI at cosmos magazine, and the management didn't tell anyone.

0:29:17.330 --> 0:29:21.080
<v S1>They're using generative AI to write articles, possibly trained on

0:29:21.110 --> 0:29:24.590
<v S1>their own authors work, and basically firing all the humans

0:29:24.590 --> 0:29:27.650
<v S1>who could have possibly predicted this. I give my kids

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:31.160
<v S1>a summer like mine. In the 1980s, this parent decided

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:34.040
<v S1>to give her ten and five year old daughters a

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:38.230
<v S1>taste of a 1980s summer holiday where the bedroom where

0:29:38.260 --> 0:29:44.920
<v S1>boredom was common and self entertainment was key. 1980. Summer holiday.

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:46.390
<v S1>This is when I grew up. I grew up in

0:29:46.390 --> 0:29:51.880
<v S1>the 80s where boredom was common and self entertainment was key. Boredom.

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:54.220
<v S1>You know how awesome it is. I'm thinking about this

0:29:54.220 --> 0:29:58.450
<v S1>right now to be a kid outside on a weekend.

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:01.210
<v S1>You had some sort of breakfast which your parents cooked

0:30:01.210 --> 0:30:03.940
<v S1>for you. You are now out playing. That's what it's called.

0:30:03.940 --> 0:30:06.520
<v S1>You're out playing. I don't know what age this is.

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:10.090
<v S1>Let's call it 12 or something like that, or 14.

0:30:10.090 --> 0:30:13.690
<v S1>You then get together with your buddies and obviously I'm

0:30:13.690 --> 0:30:16.780
<v S1>a boy, so I'm going to have a boy perspective.

0:30:16.780 --> 0:30:19.420
<v S1>But you would get together with your guy friends all

0:30:19.420 --> 0:30:21.340
<v S1>the same age and you're just like, what are we

0:30:21.370 --> 0:30:23.140
<v S1>going to do? I don't know, I don't know, what

0:30:23.140 --> 0:30:24.820
<v S1>are you going to do? And you're just like, maybe

0:30:24.850 --> 0:30:26.890
<v S1>we should go over here. No. That's stupid. We just

0:30:26.890 --> 0:30:29.080
<v S1>did that. Uh, maybe we should go over here. Hey,

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:30.580
<v S1>you want to, like, see if we can lift up

0:30:30.580 --> 0:30:33.280
<v S1>these manhole covers and, like, roll them around? Yeah, that

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:35.840
<v S1>sounds cool. So you go over, you try to stick

0:30:35.870 --> 0:30:38.209
<v S1>your finger in the hole. You try to like, wedge

0:30:38.210 --> 0:30:40.640
<v S1>some sort of piece of metal in there and yank

0:30:40.670 --> 0:30:42.530
<v S1>it up. Turns out the metal was sharp and you

0:30:42.530 --> 0:30:45.380
<v S1>just gouged your hand open. You're bleeding all over the place,

0:30:45.380 --> 0:30:47.600
<v S1>so someone, like, rips the sleeve off of their shirt

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:49.700
<v S1>and wraps it around your hand, and then you just

0:30:49.700 --> 0:30:52.940
<v S1>keep doing it, and then you just, like, roll this thing.

0:30:52.940 --> 0:30:55.640
<v S1>Then you realize, well, someone walks by here and falls

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:58.700
<v S1>in that hole like you're super screwed. You know you're

0:30:58.700 --> 0:31:00.800
<v S1>going to hurt yourself. Maybe one of your friends actually

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:03.320
<v S1>do it. Maybe you decide to climb down there because

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:05.690
<v S1>that's stupid also, but also kind of fun. Do you

0:31:05.690 --> 0:31:09.200
<v S1>know how many hundreds of these moments that I've had

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:11.960
<v S1>that Gen X people have had that are just magical?

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:14.060
<v S1>I was talking to my girl about this as well.

0:31:14.060 --> 0:31:17.330
<v S1>She loves this. The same exact thing. She would get

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:20.750
<v S1>on her bike and go riding all over the frickin town,

0:31:20.750 --> 0:31:23.660
<v S1>riding all over. Just go visit her friends and hang out.

0:31:23.660 --> 0:31:26.210
<v S1>And she'd have her bike with a banana seat and

0:31:26.210 --> 0:31:28.790
<v S1>just like, take it everywhere. And then she would start

0:31:28.790 --> 0:31:31.430
<v S1>getting hungry. The sun would start going down. And if

0:31:31.430 --> 0:31:34.130
<v S1>she didn't get home once that happened, that was an

0:31:34.130 --> 0:31:39.460
<v S1>ass whoopin and just everyone understood that you are free, 1,000%

0:31:39.460 --> 0:31:41.950
<v S1>free until the street lights come on. Then you got

0:31:41.950 --> 0:31:44.770
<v S1>to get home. Then there's dinner there for you. You

0:31:44.770 --> 0:31:48.250
<v S1>have dinner and it's just magical. There is no boredom now.

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:52.120
<v S1>Kids do not get bored because TikTok or Facebook or

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:56.260
<v S1>Instagram or whatever it is. Texting is so compelling and

0:31:56.260 --> 0:32:00.700
<v S1>arguably more compelling than manhole covers, and that's a problem.

0:32:00.700 --> 0:32:02.530
<v S1>This is what I think a big problem is. I

0:32:02.530 --> 0:32:05.200
<v S1>don't know why I'm fucking rambling about this shit, and

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:08.350
<v S1>I'm supposed to be supposed to be delivering this podcast.

0:32:08.410 --> 0:32:11.410
<v S1>I'm just going to do whatever, um, when stimuli is

0:32:11.410 --> 0:32:15.550
<v S1>too high, the dopamine level is too high, and anything

0:32:15.550 --> 0:32:18.670
<v S1>that drops the dopamine level down, let's say that currently

0:32:18.670 --> 0:32:22.420
<v S1>in 2024, things are so awesome in terms of stimuli

0:32:22.420 --> 0:32:26.800
<v S1>and inputs. The dopamine levels are like an 85, let's

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:30.730
<v S1>say in the 1980s. As an average kid, they used

0:32:30.730 --> 0:32:32.890
<v S1>to be like a 35, okay. And now they're an

0:32:32.890 --> 0:32:36.890
<v S1>85 because of like all this tech. Okay, better games,

0:32:36.890 --> 0:32:43.310
<v S1>better game consoles, better screens, better audio experiences, more video games. Okay,

0:32:43.340 --> 0:32:47.960
<v S1>more access to porn. All the social media, TikTok. I mean,

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:50.930
<v S1>it's not even 85. It's like 285. And it used

0:32:50.930 --> 0:32:54.200
<v S1>to be a 35. Okay, now try to take somebody

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:56.990
<v S1>like that and put him outside there like, are you

0:32:57.020 --> 0:32:59.840
<v S1>kidding me? It's dirty out here. You want me to

0:32:59.870 --> 0:33:02.390
<v S1>ride my bike? You want me to, like, what am

0:33:02.390 --> 0:33:05.989
<v S1>I supposed to do out here? Nothing compares. Nothing in

0:33:06.020 --> 0:33:11.510
<v S1>that world compares to TikTok. TikTok is crack. It's crack cocaine.

0:33:11.510 --> 0:33:15.500
<v S1>And that's dangerous. Now what everyone seems to know and

0:33:15.500 --> 0:33:17.750
<v S1>the experts seem to know. And I think you can

0:33:17.750 --> 0:33:20.390
<v S1>learn this just by doing it, is you can actually

0:33:20.390 --> 0:33:24.860
<v S1>reset your dopamine level very quickly. So what this person,

0:33:24.860 --> 0:33:28.880
<v S1>I think did this parents decided to give her ten

0:33:28.910 --> 0:33:31.459
<v S1>and five year old daughters a taste of the 1980s

0:33:31.490 --> 0:33:35.150
<v S1>summer holiday where boredom was common and self entertainment was key.

0:33:35.180 --> 0:33:37.610
<v S1>So what that means is you have to take the

0:33:37.610 --> 0:33:40.370
<v S1>things away and throw them together and just be like,

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:43.040
<v S1>figure out something to do and they'll be like, oh, well,

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:45.140
<v S1>let's take this blanket and put it at an angle.

0:33:45.140 --> 0:33:47.570
<v S1>And now we have a fort, right? And pretty soon

0:33:47.570 --> 0:33:51.260
<v S1>you're making forts because you were bored. And that enjoyment

0:33:51.260 --> 0:33:54.500
<v S1>of coming up with something from boredom and getting your

0:33:54.500 --> 0:33:59.270
<v S1>dopamine level from a five to a 25 feels amazing.

0:33:59.270 --> 0:34:03.830
<v S1>And it involves more creativity, more innovation. I think it's

0:34:03.830 --> 0:34:06.830
<v S1>just healthier. It's just healthier. It's more natural, it's more healthy.

0:34:06.830 --> 0:34:09.470
<v S1>And I don't think there's a problem with all the

0:34:09.469 --> 0:34:14.570
<v S1>tech and hyper, you know, blasting with dopamine from a

0:34:14.570 --> 0:34:17.660
<v S1>TikTok or whatever. But it's you got to regulate it.

0:34:17.660 --> 0:34:20.270
<v S1>You got to regulate it and go back to this

0:34:20.270 --> 0:34:24.530
<v S1>dopamine fasting and, you know, lower and slower anyway. All right.

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:28.400
<v S1>Few ideas I've had recently. The ultimate privilege, I think

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:31.250
<v S1>the ultimate privilege might be growing up in a stable

0:34:31.250 --> 0:34:35.010
<v S1>household with two parents who give you a strong work ethic.

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:37.200
<v S1>It trips me out how simple this is and how

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:39.960
<v S1>the best advice is often like this. It's the exact

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:43.830
<v S1>same with diet, exercise, relationships, and a million other things.

0:34:43.860 --> 0:34:48.840
<v S1>The best advice is concise, wise, and generally hard to do,

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:52.020
<v S1>but it is not a mystery. I think the US

0:34:52.020 --> 0:34:55.440
<v S1>and the world should lock in on this one thing.

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:59.430
<v S1>Stable two parent households that imbue a strong work ethic

0:34:59.430 --> 0:35:03.360
<v S1>and focus a lot of energy on getting to 100%

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:06.480
<v S1>on that metric. All right, next idea. The biggest market

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:09.600
<v S1>opening right now is for a product platform that validates

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:13.890
<v S1>the authenticity of content coming from a creator or publisher. Yeah,

0:35:13.890 --> 0:35:16.680
<v S1>that's a tweet. I'm not going to do the whole thread.

0:35:16.710 --> 0:35:18.839
<v S1>I used to think there was a big difference between

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:21.479
<v S1>somebody being weak and somebody being evil. I now treat

0:35:21.480 --> 0:35:24.360
<v S1>them mostly the same because the outcomes they manifest are

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:26.490
<v S1>mostly the same. The only difference is that with a

0:35:26.489 --> 0:35:29.190
<v S1>weak person, I could try to make them strong. Someone

0:35:29.190 --> 0:35:32.719
<v S1>responded and said, don't you mean cowardice and not weakness?

0:35:32.750 --> 0:35:36.140
<v S1>I'm kind of equivocating, those two. But I do see

0:35:36.140 --> 0:35:39.530
<v S1>their point. I'm not talking about, like, little children. I'm

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:42.380
<v S1>talking about. I'm not talking about somebody who's supposed to

0:35:42.380 --> 0:35:47.089
<v S1>be weak because they're disabled or they're super young. They're,

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:49.640
<v S1>you know, one and a half years old. Stop being weak.

0:35:49.670 --> 0:35:51.920
<v S1>That's not the point. The point is somebody who is

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:55.700
<v S1>weak due to a flaw in character and who is

0:35:55.700 --> 0:36:00.439
<v S1>causing damage to people around them and themselves as a result.

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:04.970
<v S1>And importantly, somebody, ideally, who could potentially fix themselves. That's

0:36:04.969 --> 0:36:08.000
<v S1>what I'm talking about. All right. Discovery fabric plus raycast.

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:11.060
<v S1>So this guy Wil Chen did a YouTube video on

0:36:11.060 --> 0:36:14.810
<v S1>how to integrate fabric into raycast. And guess what. I

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:18.020
<v S1>am now using raycast. Look at that activate trial. I

0:36:18.020 --> 0:36:22.250
<v S1>need to do that. This is. Yeah, I switched back

0:36:22.250 --> 0:36:25.280
<v S1>to spotlight because I like to use native tools rather

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:27.620
<v S1>than third party. I was on Alfred for years and

0:36:27.620 --> 0:36:30.469
<v S1>years and years and years. Then I switched back to

0:36:30.510 --> 0:36:33.509
<v S1>spotlight because there was some OS upgrade. I was like, oh,

0:36:33.540 --> 0:36:36.000
<v S1>let's see how good spotlight is. I prefer to use

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:38.820
<v S1>the native tools anyway, unless there's a compelling reason to

0:36:38.820 --> 0:36:41.130
<v S1>use a third party tool, which is why I'm on

0:36:41.130 --> 0:36:44.190
<v S1>Safari instead of Chrome. Even though Chrome is way faster.

0:36:44.190 --> 0:36:49.140
<v S1>I like the inbuilt stuff in Safari. Anyway, fabric integration

0:36:49.140 --> 0:36:52.739
<v S1>into raycast. That is a big enough reason for me

0:36:52.739 --> 0:36:54.989
<v S1>to switch back. So guess what? Now I'm about to

0:36:55.020 --> 0:36:59.100
<v S1>become a raycast guru and look at this. I might

0:36:59.100 --> 0:37:01.860
<v S1>integrate it more deeply by hosting a set of these

0:37:01.860 --> 0:37:05.310
<v S1>scripts within fabric. So basically these are Python scripts that

0:37:05.310 --> 0:37:09.630
<v S1>raycast reads and that's how raycast executes these things. So

0:37:09.630 --> 0:37:12.330
<v S1>I'm thinking about putting a whole directory of these inside

0:37:12.330 --> 0:37:14.489
<v S1>of fabric. So you could just point raycast to that

0:37:14.489 --> 0:37:17.280
<v S1>directory and boom you're ready to go. And so the

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:19.440
<v S1>way he described this you know what. Frick it. Just

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:20.550
<v S1>open it. Watch this.

0:37:20.550 --> 0:37:22.470
<v S2>Uh, okay. So, um.

0:37:22.500 --> 0:37:23.609
<v S1>I don't know if you can hear that, but.

0:37:23.610 --> 0:37:27.090
<v S2>So watch this. I, uh, look at this, like going back.

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:31.360
<v S2>Going back through these, uh, to these various patterns and fabric. Um,

0:37:31.390 --> 0:37:33.819
<v S2>like if you're if you're like if you have some

0:37:33.850 --> 0:37:36.370
<v S2>text in your selection, like if you, if you have

0:37:36.400 --> 0:37:38.230
<v S2>something you want to select or you want to quick

0:37:38.230 --> 0:37:40.299
<v S2>Paul Graham essay, I can just go ahead and just

0:37:40.300 --> 0:37:43.570
<v S2>type in extract wisdom. Right. And let's say I can

0:37:43.570 --> 0:37:44.560
<v S2>grab this one.

0:37:44.560 --> 0:37:45.550
<v S1>So he copied.

0:37:45.580 --> 0:37:47.170
<v S2>Or I can I can grab the whole thing. Grabs

0:37:47.170 --> 0:37:49.989
<v S2>the whole wisdom right. Extract wisdom. And then just type.

0:37:49.989 --> 0:37:51.490
<v S1>X and then paste it and.

0:37:51.489 --> 0:37:52.239
<v S2>It will run. And look at.

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:53.140
<v S1>This. Here comes fabric.

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:56.560
<v S2>That fabric prompt I use it to run it with

0:37:56.680 --> 0:38:00.070
<v S2>Claude Sonnet 3.5. And it's insane.

0:38:00.190 --> 0:38:04.120
<v S1>So yeah, I'm about to rig everything up in that way.

0:38:04.150 --> 0:38:07.120
<v S1>Eric Schmidt of Google did a crazy, honest interview at Stanford,

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:09.310
<v S1>and it was so spicy that Stanford took it down.

0:38:09.310 --> 0:38:11.710
<v S1>But guess what? I got the link to the video,

0:38:11.710 --> 0:38:14.049
<v S1>and I pulled out the transcript and I made a

0:38:14.050 --> 0:38:17.109
<v S1>fabric summary of it. So there you go. Ideal founding

0:38:17.140 --> 0:38:20.110
<v S1>team Ben Horowitz lays out the perfect founding team in

0:38:20.110 --> 0:38:23.049
<v S1>the clearest way I've ever seen. It's just it's really good.

0:38:23.050 --> 0:38:27.279
<v S1>Scrape it now. New CLI tool for web scraping grok two.

0:38:27.310 --> 0:38:29.549
<v S1>This is the one that just does all sorts of

0:38:29.580 --> 0:38:33.690
<v S1>crazy stuff. Prompt caching with Claude Flux AI by Black

0:38:33.690 --> 0:38:36.390
<v S1>Forest Labs. This one getting a lot of talk. I

0:38:36.390 --> 0:38:38.609
<v S1>haven't used it yet because I'm not doing a lot

0:38:38.610 --> 0:38:41.550
<v S1>of AI image stuff. When I need an AI image,

0:38:41.550 --> 0:38:44.939
<v S1>I usually use Midjourney. Still graphic info. New website lets

0:38:44.940 --> 0:38:48.690
<v S1>you generate infographics to make your articles more engaging. Agile

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:51.360
<v S1>is for losers, a rant about the author's decade long

0:38:51.390 --> 0:38:55.860
<v S1>frustrations with the agile methodology infiltrating digital agencies, and the

0:38:55.860 --> 0:38:59.759
<v S1>recommendation of the week. Stop accepting it when your loved ones,

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:02.940
<v S1>especially the young people, are not AI literate. Here's the

0:39:02.940 --> 0:39:04.980
<v S1>way I recommend you think about this. Imagine that the

0:39:04.980 --> 0:39:08.460
<v S1>competition level for getting top jobs or mates or whatever

0:39:08.460 --> 0:39:12.690
<v S1>was 100. In 2022, the average person was at like

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:17.480
<v S1>an 80. Okay. AI is augmentation technology. It adds 20

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:20.040
<v S1>to 50 points to people who get good at it.

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:23.100
<v S1>So now the person with an 85 learns AI and

0:39:23.100 --> 0:39:26.850
<v S1>they're like a 125. So the new standard is reset

0:39:26.850 --> 0:39:30.340
<v S1>from 80 to 120. So if you were a 90

0:39:30.370 --> 0:39:33.910
<v S1>before or a 110, you are now behind. Don't let

0:39:33.910 --> 0:39:38.110
<v S1>your people get left behind. I is the new reading.

0:39:38.110 --> 0:39:40.990
<v S1>It's the new high school diploma. It's the new degree.

0:39:40.989 --> 0:39:44.709
<v S1>Make sure your people, the people that you love, have it.

0:39:44.710 --> 0:39:47.350
<v S1>And just to show you how real this thing is. Okay,

0:39:47.380 --> 0:39:50.200
<v S1>this is the best. This is the absolute best. And

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:53.620
<v S1>to get you motivated, here is an 18. No an

0:39:53.650 --> 0:39:57.370
<v S1>eight year old. Here's an eight year old doing live coding.

0:39:57.370 --> 0:40:01.780
<v S3>Watch this thing every one. And today I'm well I'm.

0:40:01.780 --> 0:40:09.460
<v S3>Yeah I'm going to show you how to code with cursor.

0:40:09.489 --> 0:40:12.850
<v S3>I'm gonna go to terminal and I'm going to say

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:15.730
<v S3>new terminal and new terminal.

0:40:15.760 --> 0:40:16.030
<v S1>Look at.

0:40:16.030 --> 0:40:16.330
<v S3>This.

0:40:16.810 --> 0:40:18.070
<v S1>She's she's running.

0:40:18.250 --> 0:40:22.120
<v S3>Pom pom run npm.

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:22.780
<v S1>Run dev.

0:40:22.810 --> 0:40:26.770
<v S3>There I have that. And then I go to be

0:40:26.800 --> 0:40:30.450
<v S3>and look, I made it. Say hello. I want this

0:40:30.450 --> 0:40:33.720
<v S3>to say. Say hey.

0:40:33.750 --> 0:40:34.649
<v S1>Okay, so we're gonna.

0:40:34.950 --> 0:40:35.279
<v S3>We're gonna.

0:40:35.310 --> 0:40:36.720
<v S1>Jump ahead here.

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:42.600
<v S3>So, um, I wanted to say chat with Harry and

0:40:43.200 --> 0:40:46.620
<v S3>and then recent cloudfare workers AI. And then it will

0:40:46.620 --> 0:40:50.820
<v S3>do all of the stuff. So you can't do it

0:40:50.820 --> 0:40:54.390
<v S3>if it's not finished, because then it just won't work.

0:40:54.480 --> 0:41:01.200
<v S3>So now I'm gonna save it. So now I'm going

0:41:01.230 --> 0:41:06.240
<v S3>to say hi. Wicked. Hi there. I'm Harry James Potter.

0:41:08.580 --> 0:41:09.690
<v S3>Oh my goodness.

0:41:09.690 --> 0:41:12.930
<v S1>She just built a chat bot to talk to Harry Potter.

0:41:13.290 --> 0:41:14.100
<v S1>She's eight years.

0:41:14.100 --> 0:41:15.299
<v S3>Old, right?

0:41:15.330 --> 0:41:18.240
<v S1>Okay, I'm telling you, that is an eight year old

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:21.509
<v S1>who just built a chat bot to talk to Harry Potter. Okay.

0:41:21.540 --> 0:41:24.060
<v S1>And you and I have a lot of loved ones

0:41:24.060 --> 0:41:26.680
<v S1>who were like, oh, ChatGPT. Is that still a thing?

0:41:26.710 --> 0:41:29.680
<v S1>How is that still a thing? I thought that blew out, like,

0:41:29.710 --> 0:41:32.620
<v S1>a year ago. I thought it got really important when

0:41:32.620 --> 0:41:35.169
<v S1>people start. Stopped talking about it, and now I don't

0:41:35.170 --> 0:41:38.740
<v S1>care anymore. This is what you're competing with. Eight year olds,

0:41:38.739 --> 0:41:41.410
<v S1>building chat bots to talk to Harry Potter. All right.

0:41:41.410 --> 0:41:44.410
<v S1>And the aphorism of the week standing still in evolution

0:41:44.410 --> 0:41:48.610
<v S1>is equivalent to moving backwards. Standing still in evolution is

0:41:48.610 --> 0:41:54.580
<v S1>equivalent to moving backwards Matt Ridley. Unsupervised learning is produced

0:41:54.580 --> 0:41:57.609
<v S1>and edited by Daniel Miessler on a Neumann U87 AI

0:41:57.610 --> 0:42:01.870
<v S1>microphone using Hindenburg. Intro and outro music is by zombie

0:42:01.870 --> 0:42:04.870
<v S1>with a Y. And to get the text and links

0:42:04.870 --> 0:42:07.120
<v S1>from this episode, sign up for the newsletter version of

0:42:07.120 --> 0:42:12.730
<v S1>the show at Daniel missler.com/newsletter. We'll see you next time.