WEBVTT - A Conversation with Christine Gadsby from BlackBerry

0:00:00.230 --> 0:00:02.960
<v S1>All right, Christine, welcome to unsupervised Learning.

0:00:03.950 --> 0:00:05.060
<v S2>Thank you for having me.

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:09.170
<v S1>All right. We're going to, uh, we're going to jump

0:00:09.170 --> 0:00:11.930
<v S1>into some stuff, uh, pretty quick here. Uh, start with

0:00:11.930 --> 0:00:17.300
<v S1>the easy stuff. Um, I. So, uh, the cybersecurity industry

0:00:17.300 --> 0:00:21.890
<v S1>has made a lot of, I guess, hubbub about AI

0:00:21.890 --> 0:00:24.829
<v S1>and basically how big it's getting. And I'm wondering, just

0:00:24.829 --> 0:00:29.590
<v S1>what are you hearing about? Like the contrast between is

0:00:29.590 --> 0:00:32.500
<v S1>it is it hype? Is it really happening? Is it really,

0:00:32.500 --> 0:00:35.229
<v S1>really happening? Like how much of it is like potential

0:00:35.229 --> 0:00:38.920
<v S1>energy versus kinetic energy. Like what are you seeing and hearing.

0:00:39.820 --> 0:00:43.479
<v S2>So that's a great question to start. Um, it you know,

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:45.880
<v S2>I guess I'll, I'll start with your first ask, which

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:49.150
<v S2>is is it real? Uh, absolutely. It's real. I think

0:00:49.150 --> 0:00:52.870
<v S2>that when you look at the security industry as a whole, um,

0:00:52.870 --> 0:00:55.490
<v S2>when you look at the the places that we have

0:00:55.490 --> 0:00:58.370
<v S2>to focus most of our time and energy as leaders or,

0:00:58.370 --> 0:01:01.490
<v S2>you know, budget or, you know, actually just doing pure

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.880
<v S2>security work, um, you know, you can't help but miss

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:08.480
<v S2>things like incident response, threat hunting, you know, looking at

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:12.290
<v S2>indications of compromise, because that's kind of where it all starts. Uh,

0:01:12.290 --> 0:01:16.730
<v S2>and I has a beautiful ability, um, in my opinion, to,

0:01:16.730 --> 0:01:22.140
<v S2>you know, empower smarter decisions, um, quicker, more accurate assessments,

0:01:22.140 --> 0:01:25.860
<v S2>especially when looking at indicators of compromise. Um, within your

0:01:25.860 --> 0:01:28.229
<v S2>incident response team, which again, takes to, you know, tends

0:01:28.230 --> 0:01:30.480
<v S2>to be one of the most critical functions in any

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.810
<v S2>security team, uh, and also one of the hardest to

0:01:33.810 --> 0:01:38.580
<v S2>staff and most costly. Um, so I think that there,

0:01:38.580 --> 0:01:41.990
<v S2>you know, it's definitely real and there's lot of opportunity

0:01:41.990 --> 0:01:47.120
<v S2>to take that and make it, um, much more intelligent. Uh,

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:49.610
<v S2>you know, it's a battlefield. So as we get smarter,

0:01:49.610 --> 0:01:51.980
<v S2>our adversaries get smarter. So I think there's also a

0:01:51.980 --> 0:01:53.510
<v S2>kind of a give and take of almost that you

0:01:53.510 --> 0:01:56.450
<v S2>have to pay attention. Um, because if you're not paying attention,

0:01:56.450 --> 0:01:59.090
<v S2>obviously your enemies are. Yeah.

0:02:00.110 --> 0:02:03.770
<v S1>Yeah, that makes sense. So you mentioned incident response. So

0:02:03.770 --> 0:02:06.630
<v S1>what are some other areas that, um, seem pretty ripe

0:02:06.630 --> 0:02:07.410
<v S1>for you?

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.950
<v S2>Yeah. Well, I mean, the entire security program and it's

0:02:10.950 --> 0:02:15.960
<v S2>in in its functions and roles are all right for automation. Um,

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:18.240
<v S2>and I think that companies that are really on the

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:21.720
<v S2>forefront of this technology are doing things like, you know,

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.570
<v S2>sandboxing their own data lakes and then using AI to

0:02:24.570 --> 0:02:28.440
<v S2>really plug into that to make really great automated decisions. Uh,

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:31.450
<v S2>I mean, there's definitely a ton of power in that. Um,

0:02:31.450 --> 0:02:33.429
<v S2>if you're a bigger company and have a lot of data,

0:02:33.460 --> 0:02:34.810
<v S2>you know, that's kind of the way to go. But

0:02:34.810 --> 0:02:36.790
<v S2>I think it's really important to to look at the

0:02:36.790 --> 0:02:40.630
<v S2>types of industries and companies that really need to be

0:02:40.630 --> 0:02:43.750
<v S2>focusing on AI. And I think there's a difference between,

0:02:43.750 --> 0:02:47.470
<v S2>you know, I use this example when I'm speaking to

0:02:47.470 --> 0:02:49.930
<v S2>others in the industry, if you are a, you know,

0:02:49.930 --> 0:02:52.929
<v S2>a company that, uh, is a, um, I don't know,

0:02:52.930 --> 0:02:56.310
<v S2>a lumber distributor, you know, you're, you're building boards that

0:02:56.310 --> 0:02:58.889
<v S2>are going to go build somebody's houses. Your attack surface

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:04.590
<v S2>is absolutely not the same as a company developing security software, right?

0:03:04.590 --> 0:03:07.830
<v S2>You know, the the company that is, you know, maybe

0:03:07.830 --> 0:03:11.010
<v S2>not publicly traded also and doesn't really have that that

0:03:11.010 --> 0:03:15.690
<v S2>risk from, um, customer information might be worried about protecting

0:03:15.690 --> 0:03:19.420
<v S2>maybe their financial data, or maybe their even their company

0:03:19.419 --> 0:03:22.870
<v S2>trade secrets. But a secure software developer who has a

0:03:22.870 --> 0:03:27.070
<v S2>product they're actually selling into, you know, the highly regulated environment,

0:03:27.070 --> 0:03:30.130
<v S2>who inherits their attack surface and becomes part of their

0:03:30.130 --> 0:03:33.850
<v S2>supply chain. You know, that's a more a different role

0:03:33.850 --> 0:03:38.080
<v S2>for AI, right? So I think it's also imperative that

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:41.400
<v S2>we balance kind of the need for that. And and

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:43.620
<v S2>you know, where you're going to to invest, so to

0:03:43.620 --> 0:03:47.010
<v S2>speak for that. You know, that latter example of, you know,

0:03:47.010 --> 0:03:50.100
<v S2>companies like ours that are selling, you know, security software

0:03:50.100 --> 0:03:53.790
<v S2>into highly regulated environments. It's we, you know, it's table stakes.

0:03:53.790 --> 0:03:57.930
<v S2>We have to understand that landscape, um, and automation and

0:03:57.930 --> 0:04:01.320
<v S2>AI driven, you know, response really is the value. I mean,

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:03.660
<v S2>there's lots of value in AI, but that's definitely where

0:04:03.660 --> 0:04:07.390
<v S2>I see the, the most value because you're, you know,

0:04:07.390 --> 0:04:10.720
<v S2>you're you're hitting in so many areas. Um, not only

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:13.810
<v S2>are you able to look at indicators of compromise and

0:04:13.810 --> 0:04:18.010
<v S2>make quicker, faster decisions, but you can look at hypothesis

0:04:18.010 --> 0:04:21.070
<v S2>driven decisions that have already been proven, which is, you know,

0:04:21.070 --> 0:04:24.880
<v S2>really brings on to the intelligence. So, um, it's kind

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:27.490
<v S2>of like driving a car from 1986 and driving the

0:04:27.490 --> 0:04:30.890
<v S2>space shuttle. You know, there's just so much more, um,

0:04:31.070 --> 0:04:36.830
<v S2>overwhelming capability. But, you know, of course, that also comes with, uh, responsibility. Um,

0:04:36.830 --> 0:04:40.250
<v S2>but that's, you know, definitely an area I see, um,

0:04:40.250 --> 0:04:42.080
<v S2>disrupting the industry for sure.

0:04:42.950 --> 0:04:46.400
<v S1>Yeah. And you're the VP of product security over there

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:50.539
<v S1>at BlackBerry. So how are you seeing it in your products?

0:04:50.930 --> 0:04:55.479
<v S2>Well, I think probably the biggest, um, impact we're seeing

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.180
<v S2>in our products is actually the services we're offering with

0:04:58.180 --> 0:05:01.930
<v S2>the AI, you know, included in it. So, you know,

0:05:01.930 --> 0:05:05.560
<v S2>our guard team has, uh, which is professional services that does,

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.890
<v S2>you know, incident response for these, these mid to smaller

0:05:08.890 --> 0:05:11.650
<v S2>enterprise companies or any company for that matter. But where

0:05:11.650 --> 0:05:15.610
<v S2>I really see the pain from this is coming from

0:05:15.610 --> 0:05:19.219
<v S2>these you know many companies that just don't have the

0:05:19.220 --> 0:05:22.580
<v S2>ability to scale this fast enough. Um, you know, attackers

0:05:22.580 --> 0:05:26.330
<v S2>are getting smarter and it takes time. Um, staffing challenges,

0:05:26.330 --> 0:05:29.660
<v S2>all of that great stuff to really scale to that.

0:05:29.660 --> 0:05:32.480
<v S2>And where we're really seeing, I think the most impact

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:35.510
<v S2>there is, you know, our services team who has the

0:05:35.510 --> 0:05:38.210
<v S2>ability to scale for, you know, for the company that

0:05:38.210 --> 0:05:40.369
<v S2>might not be able to, um, you know, they have

0:05:40.370 --> 0:05:42.720
<v S2>a dashboard and they can literally hit, you know, a

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.210
<v S2>help me button, so to speak. And then we have

0:05:45.210 --> 0:05:47.880
<v S2>a team of people that can run these AI and

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.820
<v S2>automation driven decisions for them. So I think that that's

0:05:50.820 --> 0:05:54.120
<v S2>really been one of the bigger things that we've seen. Uh,

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:58.410
<v S2>you know, we as a company, historically when we, um,

0:05:58.410 --> 0:06:02.100
<v S2>purchased silence as a company, you know, brought AI into

0:06:02.100 --> 0:06:05.420
<v S2>our company long before I was really even talked about.

0:06:05.420 --> 0:06:09.799
<v S2>So we've we've definitely got the, the historical, um, expertise

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:13.310
<v S2>built into, um, to some of that decision making with AI.

0:06:14.900 --> 0:06:17.420
<v S1>Yeah, that makes sense. I mean, I guess can I

0:06:17.420 --> 0:06:23.150
<v S1>step back? Um, really interesting. So you have all this

0:06:23.150 --> 0:06:25.729
<v S1>stuff going on there at BlackBerry. You have. I've talked

0:06:25.730 --> 0:06:29.490
<v S1>to multiple people over there, uh, through unsupervised learning, and

0:06:29.490 --> 0:06:31.469
<v S1>it's like you've got a whole bunch of AI research

0:06:31.470 --> 0:06:34.409
<v S1>going on. You've got your whole team there, you've got

0:06:34.410 --> 0:06:39.780
<v S1>all these, uh, different service offerings like you mentioned, incident response, like, uh,

0:06:39.779 --> 0:06:43.049
<v S1>like other players there. And it's like, how often do

0:06:43.050 --> 0:06:45.540
<v S1>you get the question of like, oh, BlackBerry. Oh, I

0:06:45.540 --> 0:06:47.970
<v S1>didn't realize they were doing all these elite things. Is

0:06:47.970 --> 0:06:51.539
<v S1>that pretty much a regular conversation with, uh, outsiders?

0:06:51.540 --> 0:06:53.750
<v S2>It is. It is because, you know, back from the

0:06:53.750 --> 0:06:56.810
<v S2>days of the handset, um, you know, I think everybody

0:06:56.810 --> 0:07:00.860
<v S2>knew and everybody knows that BlackBerry does amazing security things.

0:07:00.860 --> 0:07:03.170
<v S2>You know, I don't think there's any question the brand

0:07:03.170 --> 0:07:06.230
<v S2>has has done us well for that over the years. And, and,

0:07:06.230 --> 0:07:09.320
<v S2>you know, the the unsaid thing is the highly regulated

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:11.780
<v S2>and people that really, really, really care. And, you know, again,

0:07:11.780 --> 0:07:14.270
<v S2>in my example of the lumber manufacturer to a highly

0:07:14.270 --> 0:07:17.520
<v S2>regulated environment, it's not the same. And BlackBerry has played

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.430
<v S2>in that highly regulated environment, you know, for a very, very,

0:07:20.430 --> 0:07:24.420
<v S2>very long time. And so we do understand, uh, the

0:07:24.420 --> 0:07:28.410
<v S2>importance and the, the just the value of just doing

0:07:28.410 --> 0:07:31.440
<v S2>pure security work. Um, and that's tough in the industry

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.830
<v S2>when you're a, a security software vendor because you're, you're,

0:07:34.830 --> 0:07:37.440
<v S2>you're in security. You're doing security, you have products that

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.900
<v S2>do security. And then the outcome is security. So it's

0:07:39.900 --> 0:07:43.119
<v S2>kind of embedded into, you know, everything that you do. Um,

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:45.310
<v S2>but I think what's really been cool to see over

0:07:45.310 --> 0:07:48.940
<v S2>the years has been to watch, um, sort of the, the,

0:07:48.940 --> 0:07:50.650
<v S2>the things out of the handset that we were really

0:07:50.650 --> 0:07:53.380
<v S2>good at and to put that into a service. Um, again,

0:07:53.380 --> 0:07:55.540
<v S2>you know, nowhere is that more applicable than what we're

0:07:55.540 --> 0:07:58.750
<v S2>talking about today with our acquisition of silence and just running,

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:02.080
<v S2>you know, the managed endpoint detection with AI in it

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:05.790
<v S2>has been really cool to see us take our really intelligent,

0:08:05.790 --> 0:08:08.400
<v S2>smart security thinking and sort of turn it and evolve

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:11.730
<v S2>into what is the most important thing today. Um, so

0:08:11.730 --> 0:08:14.100
<v S2>you know that that's been really cool to watch. But yes,

0:08:14.100 --> 0:08:16.530
<v S2>I run into that. If I had a nickel for

0:08:16.530 --> 0:08:18.240
<v S2>every time someone asked me if we were going to

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:22.530
<v S2>make phones again. Oh my gosh, if we ever, you know,

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.380
<v S2>we're I'm not saying we're making phones again. We're not. But,

0:08:25.530 --> 0:08:26.790
<v S2>you know, if we ever were to.

0:08:26.790 --> 0:08:28.440
<v S1>Do that, you heard it here first.

0:08:29.170 --> 0:08:31.630
<v S2>If we ever were, if we ever did that again.

0:08:31.630 --> 0:08:33.790
<v S2>Oh my gosh. Uh, I would have to then go

0:08:33.790 --> 0:08:36.490
<v S2>change my narrative after changing my narrative after changing it

0:08:36.490 --> 0:08:39.610
<v S2>one more time. So yes, it is, um, it is

0:08:39.610 --> 0:08:43.300
<v S2>a complicated world and security, and we definitely play in

0:08:43.300 --> 0:08:45.309
<v S2>lots of facets in it. So it is we make

0:08:45.309 --> 0:08:46.090
<v S2>it complicated too.

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:50.980
<v S1>So yeah. And now that I'm thinking about it, I'm

0:08:50.980 --> 0:08:54.500
<v S1>thinking about all the places that the handset had sort

0:08:54.500 --> 0:08:57.320
<v S1>of penetration. It was it was really big with the

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:00.140
<v S1>federal space in the US. And I imagine with governments

0:09:00.140 --> 0:09:02.870
<v S1>all over the world. So if you have talent and

0:09:02.870 --> 0:09:06.590
<v S1>you have tech and you get out of a particular market,

0:09:06.590 --> 0:09:09.650
<v S1>you still have the that talent in tech and you

0:09:09.650 --> 0:09:13.130
<v S1>still have the relationships. So that's that's seems to be

0:09:13.130 --> 0:09:17.000
<v S1>why BlackBerry's security has survived and thrived.

0:09:17.020 --> 0:09:20.920
<v S2>Absolutely, 100%. Um, you know, the one thing over the

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:26.229
<v S2>years that I've learned is, is as these, uh, regulated markets, um,

0:09:26.230 --> 0:09:30.340
<v S2>the wheel just keeps turning, the regulation just keeps getting harder.

0:09:30.340 --> 0:09:33.970
<v S2>The attackers get smarter, it never stops to evolve. So

0:09:33.970 --> 0:09:36.070
<v S2>if you think about, like, the crystal, I always talk

0:09:36.070 --> 0:09:37.750
<v S2>about my crystal ball. Like, you know, we had a

0:09:37.750 --> 0:09:39.610
<v S2>crystal ball ten years ago, and we were looking at

0:09:39.610 --> 0:09:41.780
<v S2>this like, you know, hey, these are the things that

0:09:41.780 --> 0:09:43.760
<v S2>are going to be important coming up in the next,

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:45.530
<v S2>you know, ten years. And if you look back at

0:09:45.530 --> 0:09:49.400
<v S2>that crystal ball, um, you know, we were really highly

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:51.830
<v S2>accurate on a lot of things, both in our team

0:09:51.830 --> 0:09:55.069
<v S2>and in the product teams. Um, and that trust that

0:09:55.070 --> 0:09:57.530
<v S2>you have with the highly regulated market, whether it's banks

0:09:57.530 --> 0:10:00.890
<v S2>or medical or, you know, us federal, um, or any

0:10:00.890 --> 0:10:05.210
<v S2>of the agencies, it's it's really, really, um, important to

0:10:05.230 --> 0:10:08.740
<v S2>them that they, they can trust their vendors because their

0:10:08.740 --> 0:10:12.790
<v S2>security is really only as good as their vendor security. Um,

0:10:12.970 --> 0:10:15.610
<v S2>you know, we can look at, you know, go back

0:10:15.610 --> 0:10:18.460
<v S2>to just outside of AI and malware, but going back

0:10:18.460 --> 0:10:21.790
<v S2>to things like, um, you know, log for J, you know,

0:10:21.790 --> 0:10:24.430
<v S2>just things where it really proved that the supply chain

0:10:24.429 --> 0:10:27.699
<v S2>was really only as strong as its is its weakest link. Uh,

0:10:27.700 --> 0:10:30.650
<v S2>and so I really think that, you know, vendors that

0:10:30.650 --> 0:10:33.199
<v S2>have that trust built in that, you know, really focus

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:35.750
<v S2>on this. Um, have, have sort of proven their value

0:10:35.750 --> 0:10:37.640
<v S2>over the years. Yeah.

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:41.450
<v S1>This is actually what I'm most excited about with AI is, um,

0:10:41.750 --> 0:10:44.360
<v S1>what what I call like the mini AIS or whatever

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:47.689
<v S1>it was stolen from open source. But if you look

0:10:47.690 --> 0:10:51.620
<v S1>at how many, uh, contracts are coming through or like, vendors. Um,

0:10:51.620 --> 0:10:55.020
<v S1>and then supply chain relationships. How complex and like web

0:10:55.020 --> 0:10:57.480
<v S1>do they are. And then you have like this team

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.150
<v S1>of four people or whatever for most companies, or let's

0:11:00.150 --> 0:11:03.990
<v S1>say it's 14 people. Like if you're super lucky, you

0:11:03.990 --> 0:11:08.460
<v S1>might be looking at tens of thousands of connections and

0:11:08.460 --> 0:11:11.790
<v S1>then secondary connections on top of that for like all

0:11:11.790 --> 0:11:14.430
<v S1>this different stuff. And then you're looking at billions of

0:11:14.429 --> 0:11:18.500
<v S1>log events per day or whatever. And it kind of

0:11:18.500 --> 0:11:22.160
<v S1>reminds me of, um, a lot of people don't know

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:26.090
<v S1>that when you're watching, uh, asteroids or meteors in the sky,

0:11:26.090 --> 0:11:31.520
<v S1>it's actually not NASA. It's backyard people with telescopes. Right?

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:35.810
<v S1>And there simply aren't enough eyes to watch everything that

0:11:35.809 --> 0:11:39.140
<v S1>we have to watch for. And so I really love

0:11:39.140 --> 0:11:41.819
<v S1>the fact that we can very soon we're going to

0:11:41.820 --> 0:11:45.480
<v S1>have so many different eyes and they're going to start

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:48.960
<v S1>as like, you know, lower intern level or whatever. But

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:53.100
<v S1>people are already saying 2025, those very cheap eyes might

0:11:53.100 --> 0:11:57.180
<v S1>be like PhD level, right? But imagine you have thousands

0:11:57.179 --> 0:12:01.439
<v S1>of them or millions of them. It's just bottom line.

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:04.800
<v S1>It's more coverage. It's more coverage of things in security.

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:07.730
<v S1>And there's many of them that don't have enough people

0:12:07.730 --> 0:12:08.690
<v S1>looking at them.

0:12:08.809 --> 0:12:12.560
<v S2>Yeah, yeah. And you know, the truth of the matter is, um,

0:12:12.830 --> 0:12:17.540
<v S2>you know, if, if in your example, which I love, that, uh, if,

0:12:17.540 --> 0:12:20.750
<v S2>if we don't look at it, you know, apt 32

0:12:20.780 --> 0:12:24.140
<v S2>is right. So it doesn't, you know, we we you

0:12:24.140 --> 0:12:28.610
<v S2>almost don't have a choice because as the evolution of technology,

0:12:28.610 --> 0:12:31.720
<v S2>you know, goes forward, our attackers are going to look

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:33.880
<v S2>at that no matter what. Right? So you almost have

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:36.430
<v S2>to respond. It is. And it's a it's a game

0:12:36.429 --> 0:12:39.160
<v S2>of cat and mouse. I'm the first one to admit it. Um,

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:42.250
<v S2>but you know, it is your responsibility, at least from,

0:12:42.250 --> 0:12:44.890
<v S2>you know, from my perspective, to make sure that my

0:12:44.890 --> 0:12:47.740
<v S2>company knows that, that we don't have a choice what

0:12:47.740 --> 0:12:50.170
<v S2>to look at that stuff because they will be. So

0:12:50.170 --> 0:12:52.510
<v S2>if we're going to fight that fire with fire, you know,

0:12:52.510 --> 0:12:54.850
<v S2>the then, you know, we we have to look at

0:12:54.850 --> 0:12:58.330
<v S2>it which, which is always, um, at the purest form

0:12:58.330 --> 0:13:01.150
<v S2>of the security puzzle. Um, you know, that's always the

0:13:01.150 --> 0:13:04.270
<v S2>fun thing is to sort of think about, you know,

0:13:04.270 --> 0:13:06.429
<v S2>what are their next moves going to be and what

0:13:06.429 --> 0:13:08.260
<v S2>are they going to use, and how do we get

0:13:08.260 --> 0:13:10.630
<v S2>in front of that? And how do we think faster, smarter,

0:13:10.630 --> 0:13:15.160
<v S2>you know, cheaper, better, more efficient? Um, but staffing is

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:21.030
<v S2>absolutely hands down a challenge. Um, and again, what I

0:13:21.030 --> 0:13:28.440
<v S2>see in the staffing challenge of this is as companies evolve, technically,

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:31.319
<v S2>it gets harder and harder to understand the technical landscape,

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:33.210
<v S2>let alone know who to hire, to look at the

0:13:33.210 --> 0:13:36.750
<v S2>technical landscape. So I think you have a few challenges in,

0:13:36.750 --> 0:13:39.240
<v S2>in that area that are making it tough for companies

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:40.590
<v S2>to scale 100%.

0:13:41.620 --> 0:13:46.390
<v S1>Yeah. Okay. Let's talk about that. Um, a lot a

0:13:46.390 --> 0:13:49.210
<v S1>lot of hiring managers say they can't find people, and

0:13:49.210 --> 0:13:52.390
<v S1>people say they can't find jobs. So what do you

0:13:52.390 --> 0:13:53.829
<v S1>think the disconnect is?

0:13:54.250 --> 0:13:58.150
<v S2>Well, you know, I just read something somewhere. I believe

0:13:58.150 --> 0:14:00.040
<v S2>it was a Gartner. Maybe it was a Gartner report

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:01.960
<v S2>that said something like, and I might butcher this, and

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.420
<v S2>I apologize if I do, but it was something like,

0:14:04.420 --> 0:14:09.330
<v S2>you know, in the next year, 25% will change jobs, 25%

0:14:09.330 --> 0:14:12.540
<v S2>of of of security staff will change jobs. That's crazy

0:14:12.540 --> 0:14:15.390
<v S2>to me. Like, yeah, just start with that data point.

0:14:15.390 --> 0:14:18.870
<v S2>That's that's insane. That's a quarter of the workforce. I

0:14:18.870 --> 0:14:21.450
<v S2>haven't dug into that enough to know what where the

0:14:21.450 --> 0:14:23.850
<v S2>data came from. But if that's really true, that means

0:14:23.850 --> 0:14:27.480
<v S2>a lot of things. So number one, you know, as

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.730
<v S2>a as a leader that hires and runs a team,

0:14:30.730 --> 0:14:32.920
<v S2>you know, I think are my people. I hear about

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:34.840
<v S2>the burnout, I get it. I you know what? We're

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:36.910
<v S2>fighting a war. A virtual war is being fought every

0:14:36.910 --> 0:14:39.310
<v S2>day with these teams. We all know that, right? But,

0:14:39.310 --> 0:14:41.710
<v S2>you know, the burnout factor is real. And I and

0:14:41.710 --> 0:14:45.550
<v S2>I see that. But but also are you know, I

0:14:45.550 --> 0:14:48.880
<v S2>think about things like do we do we understand that

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:51.370
<v S2>technical landscape enough to be hiring people for the right roles?

0:14:51.370 --> 0:14:54.770
<v S2>Why are people burning out? Um, you know, is it

0:14:54.770 --> 0:14:57.410
<v S2>is it this tug of war of people aren't happy

0:14:57.410 --> 0:14:59.930
<v S2>because the jobs are so hard, and because they're evolving

0:14:59.930 --> 0:15:03.620
<v S2>so fast that we we aren't keeping up or, you know,

0:15:03.620 --> 0:15:06.140
<v S2>is it the tug of war of there's a greener

0:15:06.140 --> 0:15:08.540
<v S2>pasture somewhere else? And then people are finding out that

0:15:08.540 --> 0:15:11.510
<v S2>it's really not I'm not really sure where the, the

0:15:11.510 --> 0:15:14.240
<v S2>balance of of why those numbers are the way they are,

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:18.280
<v S2>but that was really over overwhelming to me. Um, yeah.

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:21.940
<v S2>You know, and I and I and there is some

0:15:21.940 --> 0:15:24.670
<v S2>interesting research coming out that I just got a preview of.

0:15:24.670 --> 0:15:27.430
<v S2>That kind of blew me away, too. And it was

0:15:27.430 --> 0:15:30.160
<v S2>the where do you see your the question was, where

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:34.000
<v S2>do you see your hiring challenges in security. And it

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:38.650
<v S2>was it wasn't necessarily the staff as it was the

0:15:38.650 --> 0:15:43.400
<v S2>technical complication. Like it was almost like how the question was,

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:45.920
<v S2>was put out there was we don't understand or we're

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:51.050
<v S2>having problems scaling our environments technically, let alone hiring staff

0:15:51.050 --> 0:15:53.450
<v S2>to to run that. So it was almost like an

0:15:53.450 --> 0:15:55.460
<v S2>after effect of, you know, we we don't know what

0:15:55.460 --> 0:15:57.890
<v S2>tools to use. We we aren't really sure how to

0:15:57.890 --> 0:16:00.560
<v S2>plug in the right efficiency models. And so because we

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:03.650
<v S2>can't grasp our technical environment, we're really struggling to hire

0:16:03.650 --> 0:16:05.610
<v S2>people because we don't even know what to ask for.

0:16:05.610 --> 0:16:07.320
<v S2>It was kind of that string of things, and so

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.170
<v S2>I wonder how much that weighs into that as well.

0:16:10.530 --> 0:16:16.110
<v S1>Yeah, I've been pretty skeptical of these things because, like you,

0:16:16.110 --> 0:16:19.230
<v S1>I've been watching these things for, for years. And so

0:16:19.230 --> 0:16:22.110
<v S1>one report comes out, it's like we're going to need whatever,

0:16:22.110 --> 0:16:25.560
<v S1>70 million new cyber jobs within the next few years.

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.380
<v S1>And I'm like, so whatever the number is, 2 million,

0:16:28.380 --> 0:16:31.609
<v S1>70 million. I'm like, first of all, every report comes out.

0:16:31.610 --> 0:16:34.760
<v S1>The number is wildly different. Second of all, the numbers

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:39.290
<v S1>just seem crazy. And then third, if you look on

0:16:39.290 --> 0:16:42.350
<v S1>Hacker News, it's like, oh, here's all the cybersecurity people

0:16:42.350 --> 0:16:45.650
<v S1>who just got laid off. And then you go on

0:16:45.650 --> 0:16:48.170
<v S1>the Reddit boards and you see a bunch of hiring boards.

0:16:48.170 --> 0:16:50.510
<v S1>So these are all the people trying to hire. I'm like, okay,

0:16:50.510 --> 0:16:54.510
<v S1>which one is it? Do we need millions or more people?

0:16:54.510 --> 0:16:57.570
<v S1>Or are we actually having all these layoffs in cyber?

0:16:57.570 --> 0:17:00.660
<v S1>And like you said, let's say we trust that number

0:17:00.660 --> 0:17:04.080
<v S1>of 25% is that people just trading up and they're

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:10.109
<v S1>going to a better job. Like it's it's quite confusing. Um, yeah, it.

0:17:10.109 --> 0:17:12.900
<v S2>Is. And I just found it. So Gartner recently reported

0:17:12.900 --> 0:17:17.160
<v S2>that by 2025, nearly half of all cybersecurity leaders will

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:22.470
<v S2>change jobs. Half and 25% will leave for entirely different roles. So,

0:17:22.470 --> 0:17:26.670
<v S2>I mean, you know, I, I, I am so fortunate that,

0:17:26.670 --> 0:17:30.570
<v S2>you know, working for a company that does security. It's

0:17:30.570 --> 0:17:32.939
<v S2>not really I don't go into work every day and

0:17:32.940 --> 0:17:34.800
<v S2>have to, you know, defend my position. We take it

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:37.860
<v S2>so seriously that it's in every meeting and every discussion. And,

0:17:38.010 --> 0:17:39.449
<v S2>you know, I don't have to I don't have to

0:17:39.450 --> 0:17:41.550
<v S2>fight to get air time. It's like, you know, I

0:17:41.550 --> 0:17:44.400
<v S2>just go in and security is important. It's just table stakes. Right.

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:47.490
<v S2>But but many companies, it's not. And and you're seeing

0:17:47.490 --> 0:17:49.800
<v S2>more and more of the outsourcing too, right. Like you're

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:51.540
<v S2>seeing more of these companies just raise their hand and

0:17:51.540 --> 0:17:54.510
<v S2>be like, you know, I'm tapping out. Just do it.

0:17:54.510 --> 0:17:56.580
<v S2>I can't I can't scale it. I don't understand it.

0:17:56.580 --> 0:17:58.200
<v S2>I can't hire the people fast enough. I can't get

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:01.080
<v S2>enough automation. I have a budget and I don't know

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:03.900
<v S2>where to spend it. I don't know what to prioritize

0:18:03.900 --> 0:18:08.150
<v S2>because again, you know, the the the evolution of security

0:18:08.150 --> 0:18:10.430
<v S2>keeps rolling and attackers keep rolling. And so they're just

0:18:10.430 --> 0:18:13.369
<v S2>constantly on the hamster wheel of spinning, trying to become

0:18:13.369 --> 0:18:15.889
<v S2>more efficient with less money. And, you know, meanwhile we

0:18:15.890 --> 0:18:18.590
<v S2>got a board that's, you know, absolutely doing their jobs

0:18:18.590 --> 0:18:21.260
<v S2>and saying, you know, and this has changed a lot.

0:18:21.260 --> 0:18:23.990
<v S2>And I feel like what we're not talking about as

0:18:23.990 --> 0:18:26.360
<v S2>leaders is the role of the board. The role of

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:29.390
<v S2>the board. Driving this down has really put a lot

0:18:29.390 --> 0:18:33.240
<v S2>of pressure on many leaders to really scale with, with

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:36.629
<v S2>their budget. So, you know, I do feel like the

0:18:36.630 --> 0:18:39.449
<v S2>leaders do take a lot. I mean, I know it's stressful.

0:18:39.450 --> 0:18:42.060
<v S2>I feel it too. But, you know, leadership does take

0:18:42.060 --> 0:18:44.159
<v S2>the brunt of like do the thing, do all the

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:46.919
<v S2>things with this, you know, and that and that bucket

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:49.080
<v S2>might be great or it might not be great depending on,

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:51.420
<v S2>on the company that you're at or you know, what

0:18:51.420 --> 0:18:54.880
<v S2>scope you're able to to do. But 25% leaving for

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:56.619
<v S2>entirely different roles says a lot.

0:18:57.040 --> 0:19:01.810
<v S1>Yeah, I really liked your earlier point about maybe people

0:19:01.810 --> 0:19:04.990
<v S1>just not being able to articulate what they need. Because

0:19:04.990 --> 0:19:08.679
<v S1>if you think like because the security security group is

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:13.060
<v S1>usually just responding to engineering and leadership and engineering and

0:19:13.060 --> 0:19:15.730
<v S1>leadership are moving according to the market and according to

0:19:15.730 --> 0:19:19.500
<v S1>whatever drama is happening at the company. So it's like

0:19:19.890 --> 0:19:22.560
<v S1>security is always having to rehash their goals and everything.

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:24.480
<v S1>So it's like, oh, I guess we're not hiring that

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:26.730
<v S1>team anymore because that's no longer our focus because we

0:19:26.730 --> 0:19:30.240
<v S1>got a new CEO. So it's like the faster tech

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.450
<v S1>moves and the more chaotic a given company is, the

0:19:33.450 --> 0:19:37.410
<v S1>harder it is to hire for anything really, because things

0:19:37.410 --> 0:19:38.340
<v S1>aren't static.

0:19:39.180 --> 0:19:44.230
<v S2>100%. 100%. And as that technology gets smarter, the people

0:19:44.230 --> 0:19:46.060
<v S2>will have to scale to be the people have to

0:19:46.060 --> 0:19:48.400
<v S2>be smarter to scale. And where are we training all

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:52.449
<v S2>these amazing people? Is is security evolving and training as

0:19:52.450 --> 0:19:56.170
<v S2>fast as technology is growing? I don't know. That's the reality.

0:19:56.170 --> 0:19:58.390
<v S2>I don't know and I don't know in security, you know,

0:19:58.390 --> 0:20:00.399
<v S2>we've always had this challenge. You kind of have to

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:01.210
<v S2>be in it and do.

0:20:01.210 --> 0:20:02.230
<v S3>It to learn.

0:20:02.230 --> 0:20:05.530
<v S2>It. Right. There's no right. You can't you can't. Even

0:20:05.530 --> 0:20:09.170
<v S2>with the role of I attack. Scenarios need humans, you know,

0:20:09.170 --> 0:20:12.199
<v S2>it's like I will always be great at being hypothesis

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:14.810
<v S2>driven and being able to crowdsource brains, but it won't

0:20:14.810 --> 0:20:17.419
<v S2>tell you if it's raining on Thursday right now. You

0:20:17.420 --> 0:20:20.000
<v S2>know it won't. It won't take into account your environmental stuff.

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:21.949
<v S2>It won't. It won't say, oh, the wind's blowing at

0:20:21.950 --> 0:20:24.110
<v S2>15 degrees. We better not land this plane over here

0:20:24.109 --> 0:20:25.850
<v S2>where it's 70 degrees. I mean, it's never going to

0:20:25.850 --> 0:20:29.330
<v S2>be that that agile. It's always going to be a

0:20:29.330 --> 0:20:32.740
<v S2>thinking brain. Right. So so in order to to really

0:20:32.740 --> 0:20:35.320
<v S2>use that to its firepower, we have to have humans

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:37.419
<v S2>in front of it that know how to execute with it.

0:20:37.420 --> 0:20:40.060
<v S2>And that to me is what I'm seeing is sort

0:20:40.060 --> 0:20:43.780
<v S2>of like the big challenges. We're driving a space shuttle, right?

0:20:43.780 --> 0:20:46.090
<v S2>It's not the 86 Camry. We're driving a space shuttle.

0:20:46.090 --> 0:20:48.159
<v S2>And in order to do that, you got to have

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:51.670
<v S2>really qualified people on the front end of those space

0:20:51.670 --> 0:20:53.650
<v S2>shuttles to make sure that they get to the right places,

0:20:53.650 --> 0:20:56.600
<v S2>or you know that all the functionality is used. You

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:58.520
<v S2>know that you're making those right decisions, and it's a

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:02.390
<v S2>split second in time that I will just always sort

0:21:02.390 --> 0:21:06.080
<v S2>of have that, that it is like giving you a

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:08.120
<v S2>space shuttle. You still got to know how to drive it, right?

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:09.470
<v S2>You still got to know how to take off and

0:21:09.470 --> 0:21:11.450
<v S2>you still got to know how to land. And so

0:21:11.450 --> 0:21:14.420
<v S2>I see that as a big challenge. You could peanut

0:21:14.420 --> 0:21:17.330
<v S2>butter that story sort of across all of technology right

0:21:17.330 --> 0:21:20.130
<v S2>now in security, it's only going to be as good

0:21:20.130 --> 0:21:22.530
<v S2>as the people leading it. Mhm.

0:21:23.220 --> 0:21:26.490
<v S1>Yeah I do think AI is going to fill in

0:21:26.490 --> 0:21:29.609
<v S1>some of those gaps. Most importantly the one that you mentioned,

0:21:29.609 --> 0:21:34.410
<v S1>which is um adding context. I think that'll get easier.

0:21:34.410 --> 0:21:37.620
<v S1>But ultimately you still, like you said, got to have

0:21:37.619 --> 0:21:42.830
<v S1>humans running the show at some level. Yeah. The other

0:21:42.830 --> 0:21:46.070
<v S1>problem with the the talent thing, I think, is we

0:21:46.070 --> 0:21:48.710
<v S1>don't really have what the military has, which is, um,

0:21:48.710 --> 0:21:52.760
<v S1>you start at E-1 and you must do E-1 things

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:55.939
<v S1>before you become an E-2, and you have this pipeline,

0:21:55.940 --> 0:21:59.300
<v S1>and the pipeline is a talent pipeline, and it's also

0:21:59.450 --> 0:22:03.469
<v S1>a maturity pipeline. So and they watch very carefully how

0:22:03.470 --> 0:22:05.909
<v S1>many e-1's do we have? How many e2's do we

0:22:05.910 --> 0:22:11.130
<v S1>have enough e2's to keep the pipeline healthy for e-3s

0:22:11.130 --> 0:22:15.570
<v S1>and same for officers and whatever. So the thing that

0:22:15.570 --> 0:22:19.590
<v S1>we don't have here and actually gets worse with AI

0:22:19.619 --> 0:22:25.199
<v S1>if you start automating away tier one SoC analysts, okay,

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.050
<v S1>so the tier one goes away, how you're going to

0:22:28.050 --> 0:22:30.860
<v S1>go from 0 to 2 or 0 to 3, that's

0:22:30.859 --> 0:22:32.030
<v S1>going to be messed up.

0:22:32.090 --> 0:22:36.530
<v S2>Hundred percent agree with you. And this is again where

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:40.669
<v S2>silence guard. You know our our service that really is

0:22:40.670 --> 0:22:45.740
<v S2>SOC as a service. This is an absolutely why the

0:22:45.740 --> 0:22:47.659
<v S2>people that I talk to and you know I do

0:22:47.660 --> 0:22:50.030
<v S2>I talk to our customers and I ask them questions.

0:22:50.030 --> 0:22:53.780
<v S2>And I want to learn more about why they came

0:22:53.780 --> 0:22:56.760
<v S2>to us for help. This is their reason. They can't.

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:59.580
<v S2>So you look at the big 70,000 person company. They've

0:22:59.580 --> 0:23:01.830
<v S2>got that pipeline, they've got the e-1s sitting there getting

0:23:01.830 --> 0:23:06.030
<v S2>trained right. And they know their progression through the system. Yes.

0:23:06.030 --> 0:23:09.300
<v S2>Mid to smaller enterprise companies don't have the staff to

0:23:09.300 --> 0:23:12.780
<v S2>do that. They don't have the luxury to build that firepower. Right.

0:23:12.780 --> 0:23:16.500
<v S2>And so they're constantly hamster wheel chasing the evolvement of

0:23:16.500 --> 0:23:20.170
<v S2>this technology with being able to hire and keep the

0:23:20.170 --> 0:23:22.720
<v S2>senior or senior enough people to be able to make

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:25.420
<v S2>good decisions. And how do you you know and and

0:23:25.420 --> 0:23:26.800
<v S2>you know this as well as I do, how do

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:28.690
<v S2>you take one person and scale all of that? When

0:23:28.690 --> 0:23:31.210
<v S2>you're a small company? The answer is you don't. You can't.

0:23:31.210 --> 0:23:34.119
<v S2>There's no way you're either going to have to hire

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:37.510
<v S2>somebody so senior that, you know, they they can do

0:23:37.510 --> 0:23:39.669
<v S2>all of the things. And then does the senior person

0:23:39.670 --> 0:23:41.710
<v S2>want to do that stuff anymore in their career? Right.

0:23:41.710 --> 0:23:44.580
<v S2>This is why we we can't have nice things in security, right?

0:23:44.580 --> 0:23:48.540
<v S2>We we have all these really amazingly intelligent people. But

0:23:48.540 --> 0:23:52.109
<v S2>then the the work, the actual analyst level work that

0:23:52.109 --> 0:23:56.550
<v S2>needs to happen, you know, it's it's hard. It's it's

0:23:56.550 --> 0:23:59.190
<v S2>a grind. Right. And this is again AI is going

0:23:59.190 --> 0:24:01.409
<v S2>to come in and make smarter decisions. But you still

0:24:01.410 --> 0:24:03.960
<v S2>got to have someone at the dashboard right. Yeah.

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:07.419
<v S1>And yeah. And maybe that senior person comes in, finds

0:24:07.420 --> 0:24:09.520
<v S1>out they have to do tier one, tier two and

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:12.580
<v S1>tier three, and they become part of your 25% who

0:24:12.580 --> 0:24:15.010
<v S1>jumps jobs? Right, right. Yeah.

0:24:15.220 --> 0:24:17.439
<v S2>Or with half. It's actually that number was half.

0:24:17.650 --> 0:24:18.910
<v S1>That was half. It was.

0:24:18.910 --> 0:24:21.910
<v S2>Half. The leaders are leaving and then 25% are getting

0:24:21.910 --> 0:24:24.730
<v S2>out of or completely doing different jobs. Didn't say they're

0:24:24.730 --> 0:24:26.110
<v S2>out of getting out of I have to go back.

0:24:26.109 --> 0:24:28.330
<v S2>I didn't say that they were getting out of security,

0:24:28.330 --> 0:24:31.790
<v S2>but they're going to do completely different jobs, which is crazy.

0:24:31.790 --> 0:24:35.060
<v S2>That just says they're entirely different roles is what is

0:24:35.060 --> 0:24:37.760
<v S2>what the report says. So I mean, that just says that,

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:39.890
<v S2>you know, like, uh.

0:24:40.430 --> 0:24:42.830
<v S1>I think they weren't happy for some reason.

0:24:42.830 --> 0:24:46.580
<v S2>Right. And I think that the pressure cooker that the

0:24:46.580 --> 0:24:51.590
<v S2>other side is facing that companies are facing is, you know,

0:24:51.590 --> 0:24:56.590
<v S2>the evolvement of things like reporting, you know, reporting requirements, um,

0:24:57.430 --> 0:25:00.970
<v S2>the evolvement of breaches that are happening, all of these things,

0:25:00.970 --> 0:25:03.340
<v S2>and they're costing more money. And then you have all

0:25:03.340 --> 0:25:05.679
<v S2>this regulation coming in on top of it, which is

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:08.380
<v S2>just creating so much more of a pressure cooker for

0:25:08.380 --> 0:25:11.560
<v S2>companies to operate in. Um, you know, and they're worried

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:16.000
<v S2>about reputational damage. So, you know, that's something that, you know,

0:25:16.180 --> 0:25:19.340
<v S2>before what I don't know, maybe three, 4 or 5

0:25:19.340 --> 0:25:22.159
<v S2>years ago, we all knew, I mean, you know, our brand,

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:23.720
<v S2>of course, you know, we talk about it all the time,

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:26.720
<v S2>but but, you know, other companies really didn't I didn't

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:28.520
<v S2>have any peers in the industry where this was a

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:31.760
<v S2>huge concern for them. And now it's a concern for everybody,

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:34.790
<v S2>which is the reporting requirements, your air and your dirty

0:25:34.790 --> 0:25:37.430
<v S2>laundry no matter what. Right. So you're going to have

0:25:37.430 --> 0:25:40.490
<v S2>to take into account with the board, you know, the

0:25:40.490 --> 0:25:42.639
<v S2>damage that it could happen to your brand. So I

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:45.280
<v S2>think there is so much more of a, of a,

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:47.920
<v S2>of a willingness for so many more CISOs to sort

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:49.810
<v S2>of raise their hand and be like, you know, hey,

0:25:49.810 --> 0:25:52.419
<v S2>I'm tapping out. I got to hire a service to

0:25:52.420 --> 0:25:53.920
<v S2>do this. I have to go to a third party.

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:56.440
<v S2>I just can't it's not it's not helping me drive

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:59.320
<v S2>my business forward. I have to just have other other

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:03.190
<v S2>companies and other other, you know, technologies help me with this.

0:26:03.190 --> 0:26:06.410
<v S2>So it is a really interesting evolvement. Um, in, in

0:26:06.410 --> 0:26:10.100
<v S2>the the pressure cooker of the Y, I guess I

0:26:10.100 --> 0:26:13.520
<v S2>is so needed is is definitely interesting, especially over the

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:15.409
<v S2>last year. Yeah.

0:26:16.430 --> 0:26:20.929
<v S1>So here's, uh, something I didn't plan on saying in 2024, but, um,

0:26:20.930 --> 0:26:23.810
<v S1>it seems like crypto is coming back. Um, or at

0:26:23.810 --> 0:26:26.540
<v S1>least the interest is I, I haven't been tracking it closely,

0:26:26.540 --> 0:26:29.750
<v S1>but it seems like the attacks are coming with it.

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:33.180
<v S1>Are you all seeing a lot more attacks inside of crypto?

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.810
<v S2>Yeah, I mean, I think I think you're right. I

0:26:36.810 --> 0:26:40.950
<v S2>think it is interesting how crypto and crypto mining specifically

0:26:40.950 --> 0:26:43.410
<v S2>has sort of done this. I think it hit like

0:26:43.410 --> 0:26:45.570
<v S2>this really. I think when crypto was kind of new,

0:26:45.570 --> 0:26:48.330
<v S2>it hit like this. Wow, you can mine. And then

0:26:48.330 --> 0:26:50.070
<v S2>I think it went kind of quiet for a while

0:26:50.070 --> 0:26:53.040
<v S2>and I didn't hear a lot more about it. But again,

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:56.690
<v S2>you know, going back to something like apt 32 where,

0:26:56.690 --> 0:26:59.540
<v S2>you know, that is like kind of their common theme

0:26:59.540 --> 0:27:05.150
<v S2>and they're really, really. So, I mean, right, as security professionals,

0:27:05.150 --> 0:27:07.220
<v S2>we got to respect the fine art. The fine art

0:27:07.220 --> 0:27:08.750
<v S2>might not be what we want to see every day,

0:27:08.750 --> 0:27:11.480
<v S2>but we do have to respect the fine art of,

0:27:11.510 --> 0:27:14.149
<v S2>you know, what they do, you know, and, and and

0:27:14.150 --> 0:27:17.630
<v S2>what we see as far as in its simplest form, um,

0:27:17.630 --> 0:27:20.070
<v S2>you know, of using a computer to do a lot

0:27:20.070 --> 0:27:23.010
<v S2>of really hard math problems, you know, to make money. Great. Okay.

0:27:23.010 --> 0:27:26.879
<v S2>But when you have a group like apt 32, that is,

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:31.590
<v S2>you know, from writing their own custom spyware, um, you know,

0:27:31.590 --> 0:27:36.060
<v S2>or Mac OS malware that's using, you know, double extension, uh,

0:27:36.060 --> 0:27:39.480
<v S2>techniques written in Perl. That's crazy to me, all the

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:42.650
<v S2>way to going on Facebook and getting people to click

0:27:42.650 --> 0:27:47.750
<v S2>phishing links, which in it's also simplest form is the

0:27:47.750 --> 0:27:52.490
<v S2>need to train employees. Right? So, you know, when you

0:27:52.490 --> 0:27:54.410
<v S2>get in the leadership level of talking about this stuff,

0:27:54.410 --> 0:27:56.630
<v S2>you know as well as I do, you know, the

0:27:56.900 --> 0:27:59.210
<v S2>CEO is always want to know, okay, how do I

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:02.330
<v S2>how do I stop this. How do I how do

0:28:02.330 --> 0:28:05.119
<v S2>I do how do I deal with things like, um,

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:07.710
<v S2>crypto mining and how do we protect ourselves from stuff

0:28:07.710 --> 0:28:09.000
<v S2>like this? And it all comes back to kind of

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:11.310
<v S2>the same thing, right? It's all, you know, training your

0:28:11.310 --> 0:28:15.629
<v S2>employees to not click on, you know, links in emails

0:28:15.630 --> 0:28:19.110
<v S2>or here or there. But again, AI is making that

0:28:19.109 --> 0:28:22.380
<v S2>so hard to detect that that is becoming a, you know,

0:28:22.380 --> 0:28:24.629
<v S2>kind of a huge arms race is who's going to

0:28:24.630 --> 0:28:26.520
<v S2>be faster at that, you know, are we going to

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:30.670
<v S2>train our employees faster? Are we going to, um, you know,

0:28:30.670 --> 0:28:32.560
<v S2>or are we going to let AI sort of take

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:35.949
<v S2>over that, that, uh, you know, that space and let

0:28:35.950 --> 0:28:39.220
<v S2>it become even even more relevant to crypto mining and

0:28:39.220 --> 0:28:40.390
<v S2>all things malware?

0:28:41.290 --> 0:28:43.930
<v S1>Yeah, that makes sense. And I guess these names here

0:28:43.930 --> 0:28:48.700
<v S1>are cryptojacking. Is that really just stealing crypto? Yeah. And then, uh,

0:28:48.700 --> 0:28:52.900
<v S1>crypto mining is just, uh, taking control of a resource, uh,

0:28:52.900 --> 0:28:55.620
<v S1>someone else's resource and using that to mine, right?

0:28:55.620 --> 0:28:59.580
<v S2>Yeah, yeah. And with crypto mining, it's really interesting because,

0:28:59.580 --> 0:29:02.370
<v S2>you know, again, back in the day when it was

0:29:02.370 --> 0:29:05.160
<v S2>sort of up and coming, it was such a big surprise.

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:07.920
<v S2>I feel like we almost got to a point where

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:10.650
<v S2>we got overloaded on it and became so common. But

0:29:10.650 --> 0:29:15.210
<v S2>the thing with crypto mining is that most I would

0:29:15.210 --> 0:29:17.850
<v S2>say I'll go on a limb and say most, most

0:29:17.860 --> 0:29:21.310
<v S2>companies that aren't really looking for that sort of traffic

0:29:21.310 --> 0:29:24.670
<v S2>don't really know that adversaries are using their systems to

0:29:24.670 --> 0:29:28.540
<v S2>do crypto mining until they get the hide power bill,

0:29:28.540 --> 0:29:31.990
<v S2>or they experience a lag, you know, a systems lag where,

0:29:31.990 --> 0:29:34.900
<v S2>you know, hey, how come this, you know, application is

0:29:34.900 --> 0:29:38.890
<v S2>taking so long to load or you know, or why

0:29:38.890 --> 0:29:41.440
<v S2>why is this system running so slow or it just

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:44.060
<v S2>took four minutes to download this one, you know, web

0:29:44.060 --> 0:29:46.760
<v S2>page or whatever. You know, they're having some sort of

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:50.060
<v S2>indicator that they don't even really know as an indicator. Right?

0:29:50.060 --> 0:29:53.150
<v S2>So I think that that is the beauty in its

0:29:53.150 --> 0:29:56.510
<v S2>simplest form of a system being taken over to do

0:29:56.510 --> 0:29:58.820
<v S2>those hard math problems as it takes resources to do

0:29:58.820 --> 0:30:02.900
<v S2>the math problems. Right. Um, you know, criminal scan machines

0:30:02.900 --> 0:30:04.910
<v S2>for ones they can, you know, they can penetrate and

0:30:04.910 --> 0:30:07.660
<v S2>get into and then they're in and they're in the

0:30:07.660 --> 0:30:10.090
<v S2>compromised systems and victims just don't realize it. And they

0:30:10.090 --> 0:30:12.820
<v S2>don't they don't know they're compromised until they see something.

0:30:12.820 --> 0:30:14.469
<v S2>And then when they see something, they don't even know,

0:30:14.470 --> 0:30:16.959
<v S2>that's what it is. Right? So I think that's the

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:19.540
<v S2>beauty of it is from an attacker perspective, is they

0:30:19.540 --> 0:30:21.940
<v S2>can be in there undetected forever. And then until you

0:30:21.940 --> 0:30:24.280
<v S2>get this really high power bill and someone in procurements

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:26.890
<v S2>like something is wrong, I'm paying this bill. It's four

0:30:26.890 --> 0:30:29.560
<v S2>times the size. We should go look at that.

0:30:30.050 --> 0:30:32.930
<v S1>Yeah, it reminds me of, uh, Cuckoo's Egg. If you

0:30:32.930 --> 0:30:38.270
<v S1>remember that book, um, where, um, who was it? Cliff Stoll? Uh,

0:30:38.270 --> 0:30:42.260
<v S1>I think he was at, um, Lawrence Livermore lab, and

0:30:42.260 --> 0:30:45.350
<v S1>he was just checking logs and noticed, like, a weird

0:30:45.350 --> 0:30:48.170
<v S1>spike of, like, someone buying something for, like, $0.02 or

0:30:48.170 --> 0:30:52.520
<v S1>something and just starts digging and ends up uncovering, like,

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:57.610
<v S1>this massive, like, German and Russian, uh, spy operation and everything.

0:30:57.610 --> 0:31:00.340
<v S1>And as you were saying that I was thinking of like,

0:31:00.340 --> 0:31:04.540
<v S1>I wonder if really, really smart crypto miners, they throttle

0:31:04.540 --> 0:31:07.660
<v S1>their stuff to try to fly under the radar, you know,

0:31:07.660 --> 0:31:10.479
<v S1>because if you just go crazy, you're more likely to

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:11.260
<v S1>get caught.

0:31:11.350 --> 0:31:14.980
<v S2>Yeah, that that is a really, really, really, really good

0:31:15.070 --> 0:31:19.520
<v S2>good point and good question. And again you know I

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:22.790
<v S2>can't I can't just help but use my, my my

0:31:22.790 --> 0:31:26.360
<v S2>my crystal ball. I mean there will be I that

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:29.180
<v S2>will help detect that stuff, right. Like like I'm a

0:31:29.180 --> 0:31:31.760
<v S2>I'm a criminal. I need to figure out how to

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:34.040
<v S2>fly a detector on the radar. Give me all the paths,

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:37.370
<v S2>performance issues that have caused, you know, this to be detected.

0:31:37.370 --> 0:31:40.220
<v S2>They're going to learn from that. Of course they are.

0:31:40.220 --> 0:31:42.900
<v S2>I gotta learn from that too. Right. So, you know,

0:31:42.900 --> 0:31:46.680
<v S2>there is as I keeps, criminals are just going to

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:48.300
<v S2>get smarter and smarter and smarter.

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:53.220
<v S1>Yeah, yeah. The I basically look at the, the legitimate

0:31:53.220 --> 0:31:55.890
<v S1>load on the system. Although the question is like how

0:31:55.890 --> 0:31:58.980
<v S1>does it know the difference between legitimate and not. But

0:31:58.980 --> 0:32:00.750
<v S1>if you if you could look at like what the

0:32:00.750 --> 0:32:03.150
<v S1>business is supposed to do and see like all the

0:32:03.150 --> 0:32:05.850
<v S1>different processes running and then it sees, wait a minute,

0:32:05.850 --> 0:32:10.250
<v S1>what's this weird process that's got, you know, spiked usage?

0:32:10.250 --> 0:32:13.790
<v S1>Maybe that's worth looking into. Well, um.

0:32:13.790 --> 0:32:16.220
<v S2>I mean, I don't want to help exploit anything, but

0:32:16.220 --> 0:32:18.410
<v S2>if this were me, okay, if this were me, I

0:32:18.410 --> 0:32:21.350
<v S2>would want to know what normal is. Yes. Right. I'd

0:32:21.350 --> 0:32:23.780
<v S2>want to. I'd want to be there silently looking at normal.

0:32:23.780 --> 0:32:25.880
<v S2>I'd want to track normal for a very long time,

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:27.500
<v S2>and I'd want to set that as a baseline, and

0:32:27.500 --> 0:32:30.239
<v S2>then I'd want to increase that by 4% and let

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:33.210
<v S2>it go. Right. Or whatever your, your throttle looks like.

0:32:33.210 --> 0:32:36.780
<v S2>But you're absolutely right. I mean, sorry, that was probably

0:32:37.710 --> 0:32:39.720
<v S2>I want to be helpful to anybody. But that is

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:43.080
<v S2>what I absolutely I mean of course. And I can

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:44.130
<v S2>provide that.

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:47.880
<v S1>Okay. So you mentioned the crystal ball. What is, uh,

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:51.150
<v S1>2025 look like for you? What do you, uh, what

0:32:51.150 --> 0:32:54.090
<v S1>are you anticipating or what might surprise you? What are

0:32:54.090 --> 0:32:54.860
<v S1>you thinking?

0:32:55.910 --> 0:33:02.480
<v S2>Um, so, I mean, for the year in for 2025, even.

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:04.460
<v S2>What is it, July? So maybe not even the rest

0:33:04.460 --> 0:33:07.730
<v S2>of the calendar year, but for 2025, I think I,

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:10.970
<v S2>you know, the one thing that I'm watching very closely

0:33:10.970 --> 0:33:15.710
<v S2>is regulation. Um, what how we evolve as a security

0:33:15.710 --> 0:33:19.110
<v S2>industry is really interesting from the from the very, very,

0:33:19.110 --> 0:33:24.180
<v S2>very top perspective. What I see is companies being held

0:33:24.180 --> 0:33:28.680
<v S2>accountable more so than ever. Right. So you see a

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:33.690
<v S2>lot of very big companies publicly being held accountable in

0:33:33.690 --> 0:33:36.510
<v S2>where it's hurting them the most, which is how they

0:33:36.510 --> 0:33:40.050
<v S2>make money procurement. Right. You see lots of we see

0:33:40.050 --> 0:33:41.670
<v S2>a lot of government regulation. We see a lot of

0:33:41.670 --> 0:33:45.729
<v S2>industry regulation. We're seeing that across the board. And it's,

0:33:45.940 --> 0:33:48.220
<v S2>you know, table stakes for companies like ours where that's

0:33:48.220 --> 0:33:50.560
<v S2>where we're really selling into those environments a lot the

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:52.959
<v S2>highly regulated environments. So we really do have to pay

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:55.930
<v S2>attention and understand that. So that's the first thing. I

0:33:55.930 --> 0:33:59.860
<v S2>think that's where the pressure will come for, for all companies.

0:34:00.010 --> 0:34:02.770
<v S2>I think the result of that will be you're going

0:34:02.770 --> 0:34:08.370
<v S2>to see lots of kicking and screaming, lots of, you know,

0:34:08.370 --> 0:34:11.880
<v S2>translation of things that what I always say internally is

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:14.280
<v S2>it defies gravity. There are a lot of really well

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:16.920
<v S2>intentioned regulations and things that we have to pay attention

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:19.950
<v S2>to as companies or as, you know, as security practitioners

0:34:19.950 --> 0:34:24.300
<v S2>that don't translate well into reality. Well, and I'll give

0:34:24.300 --> 0:34:29.190
<v S2>you an example, you need to stop all vulnerabilities, right?

0:34:29.190 --> 0:34:33.850
<v S2>Said who ever. There can be no vulnerabilities and you

0:34:33.850 --> 0:34:36.910
<v S2>must respond to everything in four minutes. Well, that's great

0:34:36.910 --> 0:34:39.640
<v S2>in theory, that's amazing. Right? But but you know as

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:41.920
<v S2>well as I do that defies gravity. There's just, you know,

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:45.129
<v S2>nobody can do that. So no company it doesn't matter

0:34:45.130 --> 0:34:46.900
<v S2>how big you are. As a matter of fact, it

0:34:46.900 --> 0:34:50.950
<v S2>almost becomes more difficult for the bigger companies because their

0:34:50.950 --> 0:34:53.109
<v S2>surface tends to be so much bigger, right? They have

0:34:53.110 --> 0:34:56.330
<v S2>so much more to watch than maybe the lumber manufacturer,

0:34:56.330 --> 0:34:59.330
<v S2>as you know this much. And the huge software producer

0:34:59.330 --> 0:35:04.009
<v S2>has a supply chain, um, in it. So I think

0:35:04.010 --> 0:35:06.230
<v S2>that in 2025, we're really going to see a lot

0:35:06.230 --> 0:35:10.610
<v S2>of pressure on supply chains knowing what's, you know, you're

0:35:10.610 --> 0:35:13.850
<v S2>a producer, you're a seller, you're a consumer. You wear

0:35:13.850 --> 0:35:15.589
<v S2>one of three hats. Are you wearing all three hats?

0:35:15.590 --> 0:35:17.060
<v S2>Are you wearing two of those hats? Are you wearing

0:35:17.060 --> 0:35:19.000
<v S2>one of those hats? And I think what we'll see

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:21.430
<v S2>is a lot of pressure on those roles to know

0:35:21.430 --> 0:35:25.570
<v S2>where they are. We're going to see a lot more, um,

0:35:25.570 --> 0:35:28.390
<v S2>arms races and security. And what I mean by arms

0:35:28.390 --> 0:35:34.450
<v S2>races is how fast can you scale the the technology

0:35:34.450 --> 0:35:38.560
<v S2>evolvement and the AI machine. It's fighting AI with AI

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:42.040
<v S2>and it absolutely is a thing. And, and, you know, uh,

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:44.149
<v S2>I do talk to a lot of other CISOs about

0:35:44.150 --> 0:35:46.819
<v S2>this that, you know, if you sleep on that one,

0:35:46.820 --> 0:35:49.010
<v S2>you're going to end up getting outpaced faster than you

0:35:49.010 --> 0:35:52.580
<v S2>can grow. So don't don't, you know, don't think for

0:35:52.580 --> 0:35:54.380
<v S2>a second that you don't have to worry about it

0:35:54.380 --> 0:35:57.650
<v S2>because you do. That's you know, I rinse and repeat

0:35:57.650 --> 0:36:00.650
<v S2>that all the time. Um, the other thing I think

0:36:00.650 --> 0:36:02.390
<v S2>we're going to see in 25 is a lot more

0:36:02.390 --> 0:36:07.009
<v S2>companies looking at the liability hot potato. So there's a

0:36:07.010 --> 0:36:10.219
<v S2>hot potato in all of this. That's a liability right.

0:36:10.219 --> 0:36:14.690
<v S2>To reporting to a board of directors, to procurement, to

0:36:14.690 --> 0:36:17.240
<v S2>how we make money and to revenue and to what

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:20.060
<v S2>we report publicly. You will see a lot more CISOs

0:36:20.060 --> 0:36:24.170
<v S2>realize that liability hot potato is something that they need

0:36:24.170 --> 0:36:27.470
<v S2>to start taking chunks out of that they own. So

0:36:27.469 --> 0:36:30.470
<v S2>you're going to see a lot more managed services, right?

0:36:30.469 --> 0:36:32.750
<v S2>You're going to see a lot more scalability with bigger

0:36:32.750 --> 0:36:35.150
<v S2>vendors where, you know, I can go to a bigger

0:36:35.150 --> 0:36:37.610
<v S2>vendor and they can provide me these services. I can

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:39.800
<v S2>then check that off my list and not necessarily have

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:40.730
<v S2>to worry about it.

0:36:40.910 --> 0:36:44.060
<v S1>And guarantees the bigger ones can provide guarantees.

0:36:44.060 --> 0:36:47.630
<v S2>Absolutely, absolutely. We just did our own right. We just

0:36:47.630 --> 0:36:49.850
<v S2>did $1 million guarantee. And so you're going to see

0:36:49.850 --> 0:36:52.130
<v S2>a lot more CISOs raise their hand and be like,

0:36:52.130 --> 0:36:56.219
<v S2>are you going to reduce my liability? Not even just security,

0:36:56.219 --> 0:36:58.200
<v S2>but but how are you going to take the pressure

0:36:58.200 --> 0:37:00.180
<v S2>off my shoulders so that I can go worry about

0:37:00.180 --> 0:37:02.670
<v S2>doing other stuff so my company can make money? You're

0:37:02.670 --> 0:37:06.000
<v S2>going to see that in 2025, really take a much

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:08.009
<v S2>more of a balancing act. So I do suspect that

0:37:08.010 --> 0:37:11.310
<v S2>that companies that offer managed services or that can scale,

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:15.330
<v S2>offering more sort of chunks of availability for their their

0:37:15.330 --> 0:37:19.219
<v S2>customers are really going to start to see, as companies

0:37:19.219 --> 0:37:20.660
<v S2>wake up and sort of be like, oh, I don't

0:37:20.660 --> 0:37:22.279
<v S2>have to do that. I can hire someone else to

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:25.250
<v S2>do it. Um, you know, and honestly, in my bottom line,

0:37:25.250 --> 0:37:27.980
<v S2>that saves me 10% because of the staffing issue or

0:37:27.980 --> 0:37:30.920
<v S2>the technology scalability issue. Um, I think we're going to

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:32.420
<v S2>see a lot of that. And that will be a

0:37:32.420 --> 0:37:36.320
<v S2>combination of regulation, putting pressure on companies to pay attention,

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:40.850
<v S2>causing liability. I mean, look at Executive Order 14028. You know,

0:37:40.850 --> 0:37:44.759
<v S2>CEOs are signing personal attestment. When does that ever happen

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:45.690
<v S2>in history? Yeah.

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:51.239
<v S1>Yeah. And what about insurance? Insurance probably be more popular

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:52.080
<v S1>because of that.

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:54.780
<v S2>Well and cyber insurance rates. Right. They're going through the

0:37:54.780 --> 0:37:57.540
<v S2>roof because there's so you know, if their rates go

0:37:57.540 --> 0:38:00.840
<v S2>down by 10% and they're saving, you know, you know,

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:04.560
<v S2>maybe the managed service that they have costs, you know, 5% more.

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:07.140
<v S2>But in reality it would cost them 20% more than

0:38:07.140 --> 0:38:09.540
<v S2>that to hire the people. And then their cyber insurance

0:38:09.540 --> 0:38:12.000
<v S2>rates drop by 10%. You're going to see a lot

0:38:12.000 --> 0:38:15.720
<v S2>more evening of the scale of of how companies look

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:19.560
<v S2>at how to manage their, you know, their incident detection response,

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:23.880
<v S2>especially especially, um, I think that's just one area that's

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:24.779
<v S2>ripe for disruption.

0:38:24.780 --> 0:38:30.089
<v S1>So yeah, I, I love these three that you mentioned.

0:38:30.090 --> 0:38:33.750
<v S1>I think you're spot on. Um, I've got a friend named, uh,

0:38:33.750 --> 0:38:38.460
<v S1>Sasha Ziegler who is talking about basically this big evolution.

0:38:38.550 --> 0:38:44.940
<v S1>Basically Enron, you had CFOs got woken up, um, right.

0:38:44.940 --> 0:38:49.140
<v S1>And now, uh, this year and last year, basically, the

0:38:49.140 --> 0:38:52.259
<v S1>SEC is causing CISOs to wake up. So he's talking

0:38:52.260 --> 0:38:57.100
<v S1>about cyber CFO. So it's basically this bifurcation where you

0:38:57.100 --> 0:39:03.430
<v S1>have technical CISOs potentially dropping down to like VP of security.

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:09.069
<v S1>And like the the more business oriented move up into

0:39:09.070 --> 0:39:10.450
<v S1>like head of risk.

0:39:10.570 --> 0:39:13.330
<v S2>Absolutely. 100%. It's a.

0:39:13.330 --> 0:39:15.880
<v S4>Business. Yeah, it's a business.

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:19.620
<v S2>And it's a costly business to maintain this company, right?

0:39:19.770 --> 0:39:23.009
<v S2>I mean, the budgets are huge or the, you know,

0:39:23.010 --> 0:39:27.210
<v S2>the it's a forcing function of. I absolutely think you're right.

0:39:27.210 --> 0:39:30.569
<v S2>And that person in that role has to balance out

0:39:30.570 --> 0:39:33.870
<v S2>the ability to generate revenue of a company to the

0:39:33.870 --> 0:39:38.939
<v S2>liability that that is on that curve of security, because

0:39:38.940 --> 0:39:43.120
<v S2>you can't, you know, the the awakening of the CISO

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:46.000
<v S2>has been, oh, gosh, you know, security is really, really

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:48.160
<v S2>important to my company. But if I don't do it,

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:50.890
<v S2>if we don't do it, you know, now with the

0:39:50.890 --> 0:39:55.540
<v S2>evolution of regulation that's happening, the brand is going to

0:39:55.540 --> 0:39:57.340
<v S2>be toast. So we won't have anything to sell in

0:39:57.340 --> 0:40:00.100
<v S2>the first place. Right? So no one will trust us.

0:40:00.219 --> 0:40:02.530
<v S2>So especially if you're in the supply chain, I think

0:40:02.530 --> 0:40:04.690
<v S2>that role will be very popular if you're in the

0:40:04.690 --> 0:40:08.460
<v S2>supply chain somewhere. Um, and you actually are selling a

0:40:08.460 --> 0:40:10.229
<v S2>widget or a part of a widget to another company

0:40:10.230 --> 0:40:11.879
<v S2>that has to sell a widget, right? And so you're

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:15.930
<v S2>buried in there's a liability factor where, you know, the

0:40:15.930 --> 0:40:17.760
<v S2>company may be selling the end widget is going to,

0:40:17.910 --> 0:40:19.739
<v S2>because of regulation, are going to turn around and hold

0:40:19.739 --> 0:40:23.070
<v S2>you accountable. So that is going to be the really

0:40:23.070 --> 0:40:24.690
<v S2>and I mean, you know, as far as our IoT

0:40:24.690 --> 0:40:28.350
<v S2>brand with with QNX in vehicles, things like that or

0:40:28.350 --> 0:40:30.799
<v S2>satellites or anything where they're going to turn around and

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:34.640
<v S2>start pointing fingers. You know, that's where that that role,

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:37.760
<v S2>I think, is really going to be critical is to

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:41.870
<v S2>understand the entire liability to a revenue chain and not

0:40:41.870 --> 0:40:45.440
<v S2>just a CISO looking at risk to, you know, it's

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:46.370
<v S2>a different skill.

0:40:46.700 --> 0:40:51.739
<v S1>Yeah. Yeah, absolutely. Well, uh, I love these predictions. I

0:40:51.739 --> 0:40:55.160
<v S1>think you're absolutely right. And perhaps we can revisit, uh,

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:57.980
<v S1>here shortly. But, uh, thank you so much for your time.

0:40:57.980 --> 0:40:59.690
<v S2>Yeah, absolutely. We'd love to.

0:41:00.230 --> 0:41:03.590
<v S1>All right. Where, um, where can we follow, uh, your work.

0:41:03.590 --> 0:41:05.750
<v S1>Your team's work? BlackBerry's work.

0:41:05.750 --> 0:41:10.790
<v S2>Yeah, absolutely. Well, blackberry.com for our external, uh, website. Um,

0:41:10.790 --> 0:41:14.030
<v S2>you follow me on LinkedIn. I'm Christine Gadsby on LinkedIn,

0:41:14.150 --> 0:41:16.400
<v S2>and I'll connect. You know, just send me an invite.

0:41:16.400 --> 0:41:19.000
<v S2>I'll connect and happy to chat. I have lots of

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:24.130
<v S2>amazing conversations with other CISOs and other VP of Product Security,

0:41:24.130 --> 0:41:26.260
<v S2>or even on the network side, just chatting with other

0:41:26.260 --> 0:41:30.129
<v S2>people around these future future predictions. And I wrote down

0:41:30.130 --> 0:41:31.660
<v S2>the name that you just gave me. I'm going to

0:41:31.690 --> 0:41:33.580
<v S2>I'm going to reach out to Sasha to. That's a

0:41:33.580 --> 0:41:36.489
<v S2>fun conversation. I love having it. Awesome.

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:38.920
<v S1>All right. Well, I enjoyed it.

0:41:38.980 --> 0:41:40.780
<v S2>Awesome. Same. Thank you. Daniel.

0:41:40.810 --> 0:41:41.770
<v S1>All right. Take care.

0:41:41.770 --> 0:41:42.910
<v S2>You too. Cheers.