WEBVTT - UL NO. 436: Thoughts on the Future of AI & Societal Stability

0:00:00.110 --> 0:00:02.240
<v S1>What do you call an endpoint security product that works

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.600
<v S1>perfectly but makes users miserable a failure? The old approach

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:08.420
<v S1>to endpoint security is to lock down employee devices and

0:00:08.420 --> 0:00:11.870
<v S1>roll out changes through forced restarts, but it just doesn't work.

0:00:11.900 --> 0:00:14.720
<v S1>It is miserable because they've got a mountain of support tickets.

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:17.570
<v S1>Employees start using personal devices just to get their work done,

0:00:17.570 --> 0:00:19.880
<v S1>and executives opt out the first time it makes them

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:22.190
<v S1>late for a meeting. You can have a successful security

0:00:22.190 --> 0:00:24.920
<v S1>implementation unless you work with end users, and that's where

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:28.100
<v S1>Kaleid comes in. Their user first device trust solution notifies

0:00:28.100 --> 0:00:30.590
<v S1>users as soon as it detects an issue on their device,

0:00:30.590 --> 0:00:32.720
<v S1>and teaches them how to solve it without needing help

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:35.930
<v S1>from it. That way, untrusted devices are blocked from authenticating,

0:00:35.930 --> 0:00:38.810
<v S1>but users don't stay blocked. Kaleidos is designed for companies

0:00:38.810 --> 0:00:42.080
<v S1>with Okta, and it works on macOS, windows, Linux, and

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:44.240
<v S1>mobile devices. So if you have Okta and you're looking

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:47.690
<v S1>for a device trust solution that respects your team, visit collider.com.

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:50.600
<v S1>Unsupervised learning to watch a demo and see how it works.

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:58.280
<v S1>That's collider.com unsupervised learning. Welcome to Unsupervised Learning, a security, AI,

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:00.830
<v S1>and meaning focused podcast that looks at how best to

0:01:00.830 --> 0:01:04.459
<v S1>thrive as humans in a post AI world. It combines

0:01:04.459 --> 0:01:08.300
<v S1>original ideas, analysis, and mental models to bring not just

0:01:08.300 --> 0:01:11.209
<v S1>the news, but why it matters and how to respond.

0:01:15.540 --> 0:01:18.330
<v S1>All right. Welcome to unsupervised learning. This is Daniel Meisler.

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:24.119
<v S1>All right. 436. In about a bunch of AI stuff here. So, uh,

0:01:24.569 --> 0:01:27.780
<v S1>big religious day for me on Monday. It was, uh,

0:01:27.780 --> 0:01:31.800
<v S1>WWDC by Apple. And what I said after it was Apple,

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:35.190
<v S1>just one. I they caught up and passed everyone basically

0:01:35.190 --> 0:01:38.190
<v S1>in one shot. And I think this is because the

0:01:38.190 --> 0:01:40.229
<v S1>thing that they get that most people don't is it

0:01:40.230 --> 0:01:42.690
<v S1>it's all about the platform. It's all about the integrations.

0:01:42.690 --> 0:01:45.809
<v S1>It's all about the ecosystem. And they're essentially the only

0:01:45.810 --> 0:01:49.200
<v S1>one who understands that and is also good at tech.

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.380
<v S1>And they also have this massive platform in the iPhone. Right.

0:01:52.380 --> 0:01:55.260
<v S1>So it's just they're just winning. They're so far ahead

0:01:55.260 --> 0:01:57.960
<v S1>of everyone in terms of long term thinking. Like it's

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:00.660
<v S1>not even close now. This one has since been cleared up,

0:02:00.660 --> 0:02:02.820
<v S1>but at the time it wasn't clear what part of

0:02:02.820 --> 0:02:06.870
<v S1>what they were doing was actually Apple stuff. And what

0:02:06.870 --> 0:02:09.420
<v S1>part was OpenAI. I feel like they could have done

0:02:09.419 --> 0:02:11.820
<v S1>a better job explaining that because I was paying attention,

0:02:11.820 --> 0:02:14.940
<v S1>and I still kind of didn't get it. Looking back,

0:02:14.940 --> 0:02:18.030
<v S1>it was pretty clear somehow I missed it. And I,

0:02:18.030 --> 0:02:20.190
<v S1>I mean, I used to work there, I've worked on

0:02:20.190 --> 0:02:23.460
<v S1>AI quite a bit and I like, I love AI

0:02:23.460 --> 0:02:25.620
<v S1>and I love Apple, and I still didn't get it.

0:02:25.620 --> 0:02:27.510
<v S1>So I feel like they could have been more clear.

0:02:27.510 --> 0:02:30.120
<v S1>So the answer to this question is that most of

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:33.060
<v S1>what they showed was actually all Apple stuff. It was

0:02:33.060 --> 0:02:37.440
<v S1>not pure OpenAI. And that that's a huge difference, right?

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.980
<v S1>So so essentially what the situation is, is, I would

0:02:40.980 --> 0:02:43.980
<v S1>say probably 90% of what they showed. I don't know,

0:02:43.980 --> 0:02:46.170
<v S1>you can figure it out for yourself. Like if you

0:02:46.169 --> 0:02:48.510
<v S1>did the the math or whatever, it doesn't really matter.

0:02:48.510 --> 0:02:51.840
<v S1>The point is like 90% roughly of everything they talked

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:56.610
<v S1>about on device, the cloud stuff, the whole new cloud infrastructure,

0:02:56.610 --> 0:03:00.870
<v S1>which is absolutely insane. They basically built a new AI

0:03:00.900 --> 0:03:05.250
<v S1>cloud infrastructure that's completely secure, where, you know, they don't

0:03:05.250 --> 0:03:08.160
<v S1>even have access to the content that's on there. They

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:11.220
<v S1>don't give that access to any third parties. It's essentially

0:03:11.220 --> 0:03:15.270
<v S1>like a cloud version of the local, very secure enclave.

0:03:15.270 --> 0:03:17.580
<v S1>I'm not sure it's quite that level, but it's pretty

0:03:17.580 --> 0:03:20.670
<v S1>much that level. It is better than anything that exists

0:03:20.669 --> 0:03:23.280
<v S1>in the industry right now in terms of like secure

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:27.180
<v S1>cloud compute, and it's just extraordinary. And they generated it

0:03:27.180 --> 0:03:30.239
<v S1>just so that they could do these AI features. So

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:33.840
<v S1>that is essentially their AI story is they're going to

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:37.140
<v S1>have deep context about you because they're Apple. And this

0:03:37.140 --> 0:03:40.050
<v S1>is essentially life OS is what we're talking about. And

0:03:40.050 --> 0:03:43.620
<v S1>so they have all that information about you and they

0:03:43.620 --> 0:03:46.290
<v S1>have the ability to bring that to AI. And what

0:03:46.290 --> 0:03:48.090
<v S1>they've done is they've made it so that if you

0:03:48.090 --> 0:03:50.610
<v S1>could do it locally, it does it locally, and if

0:03:50.610 --> 0:03:52.470
<v S1>you can't do it locally, it goes up to the

0:03:52.470 --> 0:03:56.820
<v S1>cloud using AI models by Apple. So these are Apple

0:03:56.820 --> 0:04:00.660
<v S1>models running on Apple silicon right. It's not even it's

0:04:00.660 --> 0:04:04.140
<v S1>not even Nvidia stuff. They're using their own chips also

0:04:04.140 --> 0:04:07.350
<v S1>in the cloud and obviously on device. So that's the

0:04:07.350 --> 0:04:12.480
<v S1>whole ecosystem. Now that is for all the context data okay.

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:16.590
<v S1>That's for basically all of the personal data that you have,

0:04:16.589 --> 0:04:18.810
<v S1>which they don't want to share with other people and

0:04:18.810 --> 0:04:21.210
<v S1>they want to be very, very private. Now in the

0:04:21.210 --> 0:04:23.880
<v S1>case of like looking things up like, oh, get the

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:27.270
<v S1>current weather and stuff like that. That's where they partnered

0:04:27.270 --> 0:04:31.919
<v S1>with the new Siri, with the new with OpenAI. Right.

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:34.529
<v S1>So that's that's what they did. So essentially what they

0:04:34.529 --> 0:04:38.820
<v S1>did was they said, okay for live searches, OpenAI is

0:04:38.820 --> 0:04:42.120
<v S1>really good at that. You know, fact checking, stuff like that.

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.700
<v S1>Just just calling the internet. And maybe they're not great

0:04:44.700 --> 0:04:46.620
<v S1>at fact checking, but you know what I mean? So

0:04:46.620 --> 0:04:51.420
<v S1>they're leveraging third party AI for a very specific thing,

0:04:51.420 --> 0:04:54.539
<v S1>but they're not like uploading all this stuff to OpenAI.

0:04:54.540 --> 0:04:57.599
<v S1>It's like the exact opposite of what they're doing. They

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.570
<v S1>built this whole new infrastructure just to keep it all

0:05:00.570 --> 0:05:03.299
<v S1>very secure and very private. So it's very much two

0:05:03.300 --> 0:05:06.030
<v S1>different things. Apple AI, which is like 90% of what

0:05:06.029 --> 0:05:08.580
<v S1>they talked about, which has the on prem and the

0:05:08.580 --> 0:05:12.060
<v S1>cloud component. And then this other third party integration, which

0:05:12.060 --> 0:05:14.640
<v S1>is with ChatGPT. And they even talked about yeah, they're

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:17.670
<v S1>going to do like they're looking at possibly doing Gemini.

0:05:17.670 --> 0:05:20.609
<v S1>But the point is other third party services for those

0:05:20.610 --> 0:05:24.539
<v S1>kind of integrations. But don't confuse it. That is not

0:05:24.570 --> 0:05:28.920
<v S1>what they're doing with our personal data. Like so Live Bovary.

0:05:29.070 --> 0:05:31.290
<v S1>A whole bunch of people were like, well, how do

0:05:31.290 --> 0:05:34.409
<v S1>I find an android? Like, I can't believe they're sending

0:05:34.410 --> 0:05:36.510
<v S1>all my data to OpenAI. And it's like, that is

0:05:36.510 --> 0:05:38.729
<v S1>not what they said. It's not what they said. It's

0:05:38.730 --> 0:05:42.270
<v S1>like the opposite of what they said. So, um, already

0:05:42.270 --> 0:05:46.950
<v S1>running the demos or the betas for iOS 18, uh,

0:05:46.950 --> 0:05:50.490
<v S1>remarkably stable, but largely because they didn't really change that

0:05:50.490 --> 0:05:54.060
<v S1>much yet, and they definitely haven't added like the AI

0:05:54.089 --> 0:05:57.600
<v S1>services yet. So like, Siri is still the same. That

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:00.570
<v S1>stuff is coming out like later this year, they said.

0:06:00.570 --> 0:06:03.029
<v S1>So I feel like I didn't really get the AI

0:06:03.029 --> 0:06:06.300
<v S1>features that I was looking for immediately in the beta,

0:06:06.300 --> 0:06:09.480
<v S1>which I was hoping to get. But whatever it happens

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:13.560
<v S1>when it happens went and trained kickboxing, I was. Bad

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:16.800
<v S1>at it. It was quite sad. I was like five

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.950
<v S1>times worse than a beginner, I think, because it's hard

0:06:19.950 --> 0:06:23.070
<v S1>for me to like, do things slowly and I'm like

0:06:23.070 --> 0:06:25.529
<v S1>imagining things in my brain, but my body won't do

0:06:25.529 --> 0:06:28.350
<v S1>that thing that's in my brain. I'm just very sort

0:06:28.350 --> 0:06:30.810
<v S1>of confused. So I think I'm going to do some more,

0:06:30.810 --> 0:06:34.380
<v S1>like learning the basics of the body coordination, like on

0:06:34.380 --> 0:06:37.890
<v S1>a bag, and then do it with live people after that.

0:06:37.890 --> 0:06:41.039
<v S1>That's my current plan. Plus I'm going to be doing

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:43.320
<v S1>a Gits as well. And uh, one of the most

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:47.010
<v S1>important conversations ever on AI safety. Absolutely. Got to watch

0:06:47.010 --> 0:06:51.960
<v S1>this thing. It's, uh, Leopold Aschenbrenner and Dwarkesh Patel. I've

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.630
<v S1>talked about this a million times, but it is really,

0:06:54.630 --> 0:06:58.890
<v S1>really good. Wrote a new fabric pattern called Capture Thinkers Work.

0:06:58.890 --> 0:07:03.150
<v S1>So you basically send in, like Hayek or somebody into,

0:07:03.150 --> 0:07:07.170
<v S1>you know, fabric SP capture thinkers work. And I mean,

0:07:07.170 --> 0:07:10.800
<v S1>it's extraordinary. In fact, I can show you, okay, so

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:15.180
<v S1>if we do a capture thinkers work here, let's do this.

0:07:15.180 --> 0:07:18.030
<v S1>Let's first let's blow it up some and then we'll

0:07:18.030 --> 0:07:22.740
<v S1>do who's a philosopher? Hume. We'll send that to capture

0:07:22.740 --> 0:07:26.310
<v S1>thinkers work. So comes up with a single line sentence

0:07:26.310 --> 0:07:30.900
<v S1>up here. Most impactful ideas primary advice or teachings. The

0:07:30.900 --> 0:07:33.960
<v S1>works their main works. So you can go build a

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:37.830
<v S1>reading list based on this top quotes. Something is human

0:07:37.830 --> 0:07:41.460
<v S1>if it emphasizes the role of experienced custom and sentiment

0:07:41.460 --> 0:07:45.540
<v S1>over abstract reason and innate ideas, and like advice of

0:07:45.540 --> 0:07:50.760
<v S1>how to like implement human concepts into your life. So yeah,

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:53.100
<v S1>love this pattern. It's a great way of like thinking

0:07:53.100 --> 0:07:56.430
<v S1>about someone's work. So for example, if you do like

0:07:56.460 --> 0:07:58.800
<v S1>S or Perl, which it doesn't matter if you spell

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.290
<v S1>it wrong, for example, it looks like maybe I spelled

0:08:01.290 --> 0:08:03.930
<v S1>it wrong because it corrected it to one R and

0:08:03.930 --> 0:08:07.290
<v S1>one L, but yeah. Background where they were born, the

0:08:07.290 --> 0:08:11.580
<v S1>school psychotherapy just really, really powerful. Got a thread here

0:08:11.580 --> 0:08:14.280
<v S1>on how to fight a good mentor. I, I put

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:16.230
<v S1>this out a very long time ago, but I think

0:08:16.230 --> 0:08:18.239
<v S1>it's worth sharing. I'm going to go ahead and open

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:22.260
<v S1>it up. So it's like yeah, being mentored by someone

0:08:22.260 --> 0:08:25.560
<v S1>ahead of you can really change your life. Don't overuse flattery.

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:30.600
<v S1>Ask something very specific. Behave like a future peer like don't.

0:08:30.690 --> 0:08:34.980
<v S1>Don't grovel. Basically, show your you've already done a bunch

0:08:34.980 --> 0:08:38.040
<v S1>of work and, you know, don't ask basic questions that

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:41.370
<v S1>you could have got by reading their blog or their book.

0:08:41.370 --> 0:08:43.709
<v S1>I mean, to some extent you can, but you don't

0:08:43.710 --> 0:08:46.380
<v S1>want to overdo that and ask for an opinion on

0:08:46.380 --> 0:08:48.900
<v S1>something you've created. So it's like, look, I've done work,

0:08:48.900 --> 0:08:52.979
<v S1>I've created something. I'm curious about a very specific question

0:08:52.980 --> 0:08:55.320
<v S1>about what you think about this thing you don't want

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:58.469
<v S1>to ask open ended things. Kind of a general rule

0:08:58.470 --> 0:09:01.980
<v S1>here is like, don't give them work. You're you're being

0:09:01.980 --> 0:09:05.760
<v S1>respectful of their time by asking a pretty small thing

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.640
<v S1>and sort of like presenting yourself as a peer and

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:10.770
<v S1>you're like, hey, look, I'm looking for feedback on this.

0:09:10.770 --> 0:09:12.630
<v S1>I know you've done it a lot, and that's kind

0:09:12.630 --> 0:09:15.030
<v S1>of the vibe. Or you can offer an improvement or

0:09:15.030 --> 0:09:19.800
<v S1>construction a constructive like comment or feedback on something they've

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:23.400
<v S1>done and most importantly, like produce something really cool and

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:26.189
<v S1>show it to them. And then they're likely to just like,

0:09:26.190 --> 0:09:29.040
<v S1>treat you like a future peer and interact with you.

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:31.829
<v S1>And that's the summary here. So and it got a

0:09:31.830 --> 0:09:35.670
<v S1>blog post around it okay. Let's see. Yeah. Adding source

0:09:35.670 --> 0:09:38.460
<v S1>names to stories now which we'll see here in a second.

0:09:38.460 --> 0:09:41.190
<v S1>So basically you'll know what the source is before you

0:09:41.220 --> 0:09:44.820
<v S1>click it. New member piece on the future of AI okay.

0:09:44.820 --> 0:09:46.980
<v S1>Yeah I'm going to go into this one. This one's

0:09:46.980 --> 0:09:51.690
<v S1>pretty major okay. Let's dive into this. All right. So

0:09:51.690 --> 0:09:57.210
<v S1>first thing is like my definition of AGI and ASI.

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:02.640
<v S1>So my definition of AGI is can functionally replace an

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:05.970
<v S1>average white collar worker in the US making 80 K

0:10:05.970 --> 0:10:09.540
<v S1>in 2023. And I say 2023 because it's going to

0:10:09.540 --> 0:10:12.570
<v S1>get weird. This definition will get more weird if you

0:10:12.570 --> 0:10:15.719
<v S1>don't lock it into a previous time before. Like AGI.

0:10:15.750 --> 0:10:19.500
<v S1>We're basically saying like, look, a white collar worker making

0:10:19.500 --> 0:10:22.469
<v S1>an average salary, right? Like 80 K in the US

0:10:22.470 --> 0:10:28.470
<v S1>in 2023. And ASI, I'm defining as an AGI that's

0:10:28.470 --> 0:10:32.040
<v S1>smarter and more capable than any human that's ever lived.

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:34.980
<v S1>And what what this is essentially saying is like, if

0:10:34.980 --> 0:10:37.560
<v S1>you can functionally replace an average white collar worker in

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:42.780
<v S1>the US, what that is referring to is generality, because

0:10:42.780 --> 0:10:45.150
<v S1>what I'm talking about is the ability for the boss

0:10:45.179 --> 0:10:47.610
<v S1>to say, you know what, you're actually not on that

0:10:47.610 --> 0:10:51.690
<v S1>project anymore. Go get with Julie and Lisa, and you're

0:10:51.690 --> 0:10:55.110
<v S1>being completely retasked to this other project, which is kind

0:10:55.110 --> 0:10:57.840
<v S1>of unrelated to that. And there is some issue of

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:01.860
<v S1>like specialization, but we're assuming it's still within the specialization

0:11:01.860 --> 0:11:05.189
<v S1>of that person, and it's general enough where you could

0:11:05.190 --> 0:11:08.250
<v S1>be like, look, it's a completely different task. It's a

0:11:08.250 --> 0:11:10.860
<v S1>completely different project. It's got a different time frame, it's

0:11:10.860 --> 0:11:14.250
<v S1>got different goals, it's got different metrics. And what a

0:11:14.250 --> 0:11:17.640
<v S1>human does is basically say, okay, cool, I will erase

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:20.970
<v S1>what I was thinking before. I will take the new requirements,

0:11:20.970 --> 0:11:22.560
<v S1>I will come up with a new plan and I

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:24.270
<v S1>will start working on it, which means you got to

0:11:24.270 --> 0:11:26.610
<v S1>break it into tasks. You got to have a timeline,

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:28.110
<v S1>you got to have a schedule, you got to have

0:11:28.110 --> 0:11:30.720
<v S1>all that. So in other words, it's not just narrowly

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:35.310
<v S1>executing small tasks, it's also the planning stage. It's also

0:11:35.309 --> 0:11:39.030
<v S1>constant readjustment, constant evolution of like how do I best

0:11:39.030 --> 0:11:41.880
<v S1>do this. And obviously there's different tiers of quality of

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:44.760
<v S1>people who can do that as well. But that's why

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:49.410
<v S1>I say average white collar worker making $80,000. So it's

0:11:49.410 --> 0:11:53.400
<v S1>not like exceptional. And it's not like the worst. So

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:57.000
<v S1>so given that as a definition of AGI, this general

0:11:57.000 --> 0:12:01.020
<v S1>intelligence that can like be retasked as well as do

0:12:01.020 --> 0:12:05.130
<v S1>specific tasks underneath plus answer emails plus be, you know,

0:12:05.130 --> 0:12:09.059
<v S1>communicative and, you know, basically function as a good employee.

0:12:09.059 --> 0:12:13.860
<v S1>That's essentially AGI. So given that what who is able

0:12:13.860 --> 0:12:16.319
<v S1>to do that and basically be a thinker and be

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:20.429
<v S1>a producer of new ideas, basically smarter and more capable

0:12:20.429 --> 0:12:22.800
<v S1>than any human that's ever lived. And a good way

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:26.400
<v S1>of thinking about this is like and Aschenbrenner talked about

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:29.850
<v S1>this as well in the Türkische caste. So while using

0:12:29.850 --> 0:12:33.150
<v S1>their first names, Leopold talked about that in the Dwarkesh

0:12:33.150 --> 0:12:37.170
<v S1>podcast conversation. It's essentially like, what if you could just

0:12:37.170 --> 0:12:42.570
<v S1>make like 10,000 Einsteins or John von Neumann, right? That

0:12:42.570 --> 0:12:45.810
<v S1>would be insane. So just imagine John von Neumann here,

0:12:45.809 --> 0:12:48.989
<v S1>or Einstein or whoever you want to put as like

0:12:48.990 --> 0:12:51.630
<v S1>the smartest person. And just imagine you can have a

0:12:51.630 --> 0:12:54.390
<v S1>whole bunch of them who could go and do these tasks,

0:12:54.390 --> 0:12:58.110
<v S1>like AGI tasks like, you know, most importantly, come up

0:12:58.110 --> 0:13:00.720
<v S1>with new science, come up with new innovations, come up

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:04.050
<v S1>with new medicines, but also, yeah, go do all this work,

0:13:04.050 --> 0:13:06.870
<v S1>figure out how how to do it better figure out

0:13:06.870 --> 0:13:08.429
<v S1>better ways to do all the work we have to

0:13:08.429 --> 0:13:10.830
<v S1>do and then go do it. So that's ASI. And

0:13:10.830 --> 0:13:14.339
<v S1>I'm saying essentially there's a big divide here between conscious

0:13:14.340 --> 0:13:17.580
<v S1>and unconscious. And it actually doesn't matter all that much.

0:13:17.610 --> 0:13:20.580
<v S1>A lot of people think that consciousness is on this

0:13:20.580 --> 0:13:22.890
<v S1>path over here. So it's like, oh, we're going to

0:13:22.890 --> 0:13:26.310
<v S1>get artificial narrow intelligence and then we're going to get AGI.

0:13:26.309 --> 0:13:28.440
<v S1>And then after that it becomes conscious and then it

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:31.950
<v S1>becomes super intelligent or some combination thereof. But I think

0:13:31.950 --> 0:13:34.200
<v S1>the better way to think about this is that we

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.200
<v S1>could stay completely over here and not even get consciousness,

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:41.730
<v S1>but still have artificial super intelligence, right? So one does

0:13:41.730 --> 0:13:45.300
<v S1>not require the other. And yeah, I've got prediction for

0:13:45.630 --> 0:13:50.100
<v S1>a date later on. We are now inside the post itself. Yeah.

0:13:50.100 --> 0:13:52.560
<v S1>So how I see the paths of development and the

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:54.959
<v S1>thing that got me talking about this, or thinking about

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:58.350
<v S1>this a lot more, is just this whole Leopold and

0:13:58.350 --> 0:14:02.220
<v S1>Dwarkesh thing. Yeah. So I talked about that path and

0:14:02.220 --> 0:14:06.600
<v S1>that's the conversation. Yeah. Okay. So this is basically my

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:09.420
<v S1>argument of like how we're going to get to AGI

0:14:09.420 --> 0:14:14.429
<v S1>and ASI. So I think this is a hypothesis right.

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.190
<v S1>It's it's an idea. It's a thought only so many

0:14:17.190 --> 0:14:20.640
<v S1>components to understand the world. Some of these are easily

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.850
<v S1>attainable and some are like impossible. So an impossible one

0:14:23.850 --> 0:14:26.790
<v S1>is like you can't calculate all the combinations of things

0:14:26.790 --> 0:14:31.770
<v S1>like numbers get crazy very quickly with combinations. So unless

0:14:31.770 --> 0:14:35.280
<v S1>you can brute force everything like like God or something,

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:39.060
<v S1>it's really hard. But I think there are really realistic

0:14:39.060 --> 0:14:44.489
<v S1>and approachable abstractions of that complexity. So my intuition is

0:14:44.490 --> 0:14:47.430
<v S1>that there are likely abstractions of those that we haven't

0:14:47.430 --> 0:14:51.090
<v S1>yet attained. I think that's pretty obvious. And then an

0:14:51.090 --> 0:14:54.750
<v S1>analogy I use here is like fluid dynamics representing all

0:14:54.750 --> 0:14:58.680
<v S1>the molecules in a liquid, or Newtonian physics being an

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:01.680
<v S1>abstraction for like quantum or whatever the bottom layer is.

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:05.100
<v S1>So my friend's argument is I was walking with him

0:15:05.100 --> 0:15:08.190
<v S1>recently and like, I think it's really smart. He basically

0:15:08.190 --> 0:15:11.310
<v S1>said there's limitations to what we can do, even with

0:15:11.310 --> 0:15:14.700
<v S1>super intelligence, because of the one way nature of calculation.

0:15:14.700 --> 0:15:18.060
<v S1>So basically P and P, you could try lots of things,

0:15:18.060 --> 0:15:20.130
<v S1>but it's a one way function. You can see if

0:15:20.130 --> 0:15:23.430
<v S1>it works, but you can't like immediately see all the options.

0:15:23.430 --> 0:15:26.640
<v S1>And that's kind of like P and P. So he

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.190
<v S1>came up with a great definition of intelligence, which I've

0:15:29.190 --> 0:15:32.730
<v S1>since seen like other people talking about as well, which

0:15:32.730 --> 0:15:35.880
<v S1>is like the ability to quickly reduce a search space

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:39.060
<v S1>for a problem, like like pruning trees. So there's like

0:15:39.060 --> 0:15:42.510
<v S1>100 trillion options. What can we do to get that

0:15:42.510 --> 0:15:45.990
<v S1>down to like 10 or 100 or 1000 or whatever

0:15:45.990 --> 0:15:49.050
<v S1>as fast as possible. And the faster you could do that,

0:15:49.050 --> 0:15:51.150
<v S1>the more you could do that, the more intelligent you are.

0:15:51.150 --> 0:15:54.330
<v S1>And actually reminds me a lot of quantum computing for

0:15:54.330 --> 0:15:57.120
<v S1>the first time. I've never seen like an intersection there,

0:15:57.120 --> 0:16:00.990
<v S1>but imagine that you could test multiple options all at once,

0:16:00.990 --> 0:16:03.960
<v S1>which is kind of the whole thing with quantum anyway,

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:07.530
<v S1>so here are the components I see leading to superintelligence.

0:16:07.530 --> 0:16:10.500
<v S1>One is a super complex model of the world, like

0:16:10.500 --> 0:16:14.480
<v S1>how the cell works, how medicines. Interact with cells, you know,

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:19.400
<v S1>molecular interaction with different body parts. So it's essentially like

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:23.870
<v S1>testing drugs, but doing it with models instead of like

0:16:23.870 --> 0:16:27.590
<v S1>having to actually try it in labs and people and mice.

0:16:27.590 --> 0:16:31.010
<v S1>So think of that at like all levels of physics.

0:16:31.010 --> 0:16:35.600
<v S1>So like quantum atomic molecules, cells and bigger and bigger,

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:40.010
<v S1>eventually you're at like psychology, sociology, whatever. And in some

0:16:40.010 --> 0:16:43.700
<v S1>cases it's just feeding our current understanding as text. But

0:16:43.700 --> 0:16:47.060
<v S1>even better, if you like, have actual recordings of these

0:16:47.060 --> 0:16:51.710
<v S1>things happening, similar to how Tesla taught its new full Self-Driving.

0:16:51.710 --> 0:16:55.040
<v S1>It's just like, yeah, this is here. Here are the

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:58.220
<v S1>actual interactions. Learn from that. So the use case I

0:16:58.220 --> 0:17:02.510
<v S1>kept using for this was solving human aging. So let's

0:17:02.510 --> 0:17:04.939
<v S1>say it's like the telomeres or whatever the length of

0:17:04.940 --> 0:17:07.430
<v S1>the telomeres. And there's a whole bunch of different possible

0:17:07.430 --> 0:17:10.490
<v S1>mechanisms of how aging could be happening, and therefore how

0:17:10.490 --> 0:17:12.320
<v S1>we might be able to turn it off or reverse

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.320
<v S1>it or whatever. But the most important thing is like

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:18.320
<v S1>have a deep understanding of how everything works, so you

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:20.690
<v S1>know where you could actually start to go and look.

0:17:20.690 --> 0:17:23.330
<v S1>So the next big thing for this, in my opinion,

0:17:23.330 --> 0:17:27.740
<v S1>is the patterns that analogies and metaphors. So links between things.

0:17:27.740 --> 0:17:30.679
<v S1>And we're already seeing like models get really good at that.

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:32.719
<v S1>And I think the next one is the size of

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:36.680
<v S1>the working memory. Right. So not exactly sure what this means,

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:39.800
<v S1>but it's like it's it's like your Ram or your

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:43.040
<v S1>functional memory. It's like, how much of this map can

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:45.439
<v S1>you fit in your brain at once without having to

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:47.300
<v S1>slide it over? And parts of the map fall off

0:17:47.300 --> 0:17:49.520
<v S1>the table and you can't see them. So maybe that's

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:52.220
<v S1>a combination of multiple tiers. So you have like you

0:17:52.220 --> 0:17:55.160
<v S1>have like Ram, then you have like L1, L2 inside

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:57.980
<v S1>of the CPU, which is really the brain, not really

0:17:57.980 --> 0:18:00.709
<v S1>memory but kind of all the same. Right. And then

0:18:00.710 --> 0:18:03.770
<v S1>you've got disk which is much slower, which has to

0:18:03.770 --> 0:18:07.400
<v S1>go into memory to get loaded up. And when there's

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:10.580
<v S1>too much on disk and not enough Ram, like I said,

0:18:10.580 --> 0:18:13.490
<v S1>you got to swap. Right. So these are the types

0:18:13.490 --> 0:18:16.370
<v S1>of things that I think the overall size of that

0:18:16.369 --> 0:18:21.290
<v S1>memory that can do the patterns based on the world

0:18:21.290 --> 0:18:24.800
<v S1>model is essentially what gets us there. That's my theory.

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:28.250
<v S1>And essentially this theory is that with scale inside of

0:18:28.250 --> 0:18:32.300
<v S1>neural networks, those three things just keep getting better and better,

0:18:32.300 --> 0:18:35.840
<v S1>plus some post-processing which we'll talk about, and a whole

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:38.000
<v S1>bunch of hacks and tricks that are basically just going

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:40.369
<v S1>to come with the industry, because my friend pointed out

0:18:40.369 --> 0:18:44.239
<v S1>that just the size of the model enough alone is

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:47.270
<v S1>not going to be enough, and that Post-training is super critical.

0:18:47.270 --> 0:18:50.420
<v S1>And once I got what he was saying, like, we

0:18:50.420 --> 0:18:52.790
<v S1>definitely agree on that now, it was just something that

0:18:52.790 --> 0:18:55.520
<v S1>I wasn't aware of and that got us kind of

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.010
<v S1>in line. So this is my way of capturing this.

0:18:58.010 --> 0:19:01.100
<v S1>So my hypothesis is that there are very few fundamental

0:19:01.100 --> 0:19:04.520
<v S1>components that allow AI to scale up from narrow AI

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:08.720
<v S1>to AGI to ASI. So it's a world model, sufficient

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:12.680
<v S1>training examples to allow deep enough ability to find patterns

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:17.600
<v S1>and similarities between phenomenon within that world model, sufficient working memory,

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:21.530
<v S1>and then ultimately the ability to like, model the scientific

0:19:21.530 --> 0:19:26.450
<v S1>method and test things. Ideally not having to actually do

0:19:26.450 --> 0:19:31.430
<v S1>that test, but being able to test things in an abstraction. Right.

0:19:31.430 --> 0:19:35.000
<v S1>And I'm not sure how smart or how good that is,

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:38.869
<v S1>because if you're not testing, you're not really testing. I

0:19:38.869 --> 0:19:41.690
<v S1>think this might be possible. And yeah, like I said,

0:19:41.690 --> 0:19:45.770
<v S1>I'm least confident that number four is required or that

0:19:45.770 --> 0:19:49.129
<v S1>it's possible. However, I would say that these three are

0:19:49.130 --> 0:19:53.030
<v S1>amazing and possibly enough. And this one, if it were possible,

0:19:53.030 --> 0:19:55.640
<v S1>to whatever degree, it would massively enhance the other three.

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:58.490
<v S1>And I think these are the main components. I mean,

0:19:58.490 --> 0:20:02.150
<v S1>I've spent relatively little time thinking about this. I could

0:20:02.150 --> 0:20:04.430
<v S1>revise it in the future. The other thing to say

0:20:04.430 --> 0:20:08.210
<v S1>about this is that number four, which is the testing piece,

0:20:08.210 --> 0:20:13.550
<v S1>might just be implied somehow if number one is sufficiently advanced,

0:20:13.550 --> 0:20:17.090
<v S1>if the world model is good enough, maybe we start

0:20:17.090 --> 0:20:20.090
<v S1>getting to this, I don't know. And maybe it requires

0:20:20.090 --> 0:20:24.080
<v S1>the patterns and similarities. And obviously I think a lot

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:26.690
<v S1>of this requires the memory. So I guess what I'm

0:20:26.690 --> 0:20:29.270
<v S1>saying is the whole thing might be two big things

0:20:29.270 --> 0:20:31.909
<v S1>the complexity of the world model and the size of

0:20:31.910 --> 0:20:34.669
<v S1>the active memory that it's able to use. And maybe

0:20:34.670 --> 0:20:37.910
<v S1>the patterns and the testing stuff might come along with

0:20:37.910 --> 0:20:42.050
<v S1>those two. And I guess the most controversial thing is that,

0:20:42.050 --> 0:20:45.920
<v S1>and this kind of undergirds everything I'm saying is the

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:50.270
<v S1>hypothesis that the universe has like an actual complexity that

0:20:50.270 --> 0:20:54.560
<v S1>is approachable or finite, and that models only need to

0:20:54.560 --> 0:21:00.410
<v S1>cross a certain threshold of depth of understanding or quality

0:21:00.410 --> 0:21:05.330
<v S1>of abstractions or depth of abstractions or height of abstractions

0:21:05.330 --> 0:21:10.459
<v S1>to become very similar to like a Laplacian demon in

0:21:10.460 --> 0:21:13.810
<v S1>the sense of like full knowledge. So I don't think

0:21:13.810 --> 0:21:16.869
<v S1>they can have full knowledge. I think that's God level

0:21:16.869 --> 0:21:21.189
<v S1>stuff that's supernatural. At least according to our current understanding

0:21:21.190 --> 0:21:24.760
<v S1>and my belief. But that if you hit a certain

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:29.830
<v S1>threshold or depth of abstraction quality, it's functionally very similar.

0:21:29.830 --> 0:21:34.900
<v S1>That is what I'm basing my intuition, my hypothesis of

0:21:34.900 --> 0:21:39.490
<v S1>AGI and ASI on. I got another concept called human 3.0.

0:21:39.490 --> 0:21:43.060
<v S1>So it's essentially about how many people believe that they

0:21:43.060 --> 0:21:45.370
<v S1>have ideas that are useful to the world. How many

0:21:45.369 --> 0:21:48.280
<v S1>people believe they could write a short book, percentage of

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:51.609
<v S1>a person's creativity that they're actively using in their life,

0:21:51.609 --> 0:21:55.419
<v S1>percentage of a person's total capabilities that they actually broadcast

0:21:55.420 --> 0:21:59.200
<v S1>the world as some sort of value, and the degree

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:02.710
<v S1>to which someone lives as their full spectrum self. So

0:22:02.710 --> 0:22:07.869
<v S1>in human 2.0, we're essentially living and working for capitalism.

0:22:07.869 --> 0:22:10.780
<v S1>Capitalism is like the most important thing. So we're kind

0:22:10.780 --> 0:22:14.950
<v S1>of like 10%. We're putting like 10% of our value

0:22:14.950 --> 0:22:17.980
<v S1>in what we can offer to the world, I would

0:22:17.980 --> 0:22:20.560
<v S1>argue in our CV because it's like, oh, I'm really

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:23.830
<v S1>good with Microsoft Excel, and I can send emails or whatever.

0:22:23.830 --> 0:22:26.380
<v S1>And it's like, is that really you? I don't think so.

0:22:26.380 --> 0:22:29.950
<v S1>The other aspect is that human 2.0, I would say

0:22:29.950 --> 0:22:34.570
<v S1>current model is essentially most people believing that they're not special,

0:22:34.570 --> 0:22:39.219
<v S1>most people believing that only special people write books, write blogs,

0:22:39.220 --> 0:22:44.380
<v S1>give presentations, do things like that, and regular people don't.

0:22:44.380 --> 0:22:49.060
<v S1>So two main things bifurcated lives broken into personal and professional.

0:22:49.060 --> 0:22:52.960
<v S1>This is 2.0, and the percentage of people who think

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:54.939
<v S1>that they have something to offer the world, which I

0:22:54.940 --> 0:22:59.109
<v S1>would argue is extremely low and human 3.0 is the

0:22:59.109 --> 0:23:02.710
<v S1>transition to a world where people understand that everyone has

0:23:02.710 --> 0:23:04.900
<v S1>something to offer to the world, and they live as

0:23:04.900 --> 0:23:09.280
<v S1>full spectrum people. So it's like living for other humans,

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:14.530
<v S1>living as humans, for humans, as opposed to living as

0:23:14.530 --> 0:23:19.540
<v S1>humans who like it's like living to work instead of

0:23:19.540 --> 0:23:22.810
<v S1>working to live and wouldn't even be working to live.

0:23:22.810 --> 0:23:25.270
<v S1>Human 3.0 would even be more advanced than that. It

0:23:25.270 --> 0:23:27.609
<v S1>would be. So it means like your public profile is

0:23:27.609 --> 0:23:30.850
<v S1>everything about you, right? How caring you are, how smart

0:23:30.850 --> 0:23:34.300
<v S1>you are, how funny you are, your favorite things in life,

0:23:34.300 --> 0:23:37.420
<v S1>your best ideas, the projects you like to work on,

0:23:37.420 --> 0:23:40.180
<v S1>the problems you think are important and meaningful in the world,

0:23:40.180 --> 0:23:44.380
<v S1>plus your technical skills, of course. And they know that

0:23:44.380 --> 0:23:48.070
<v S1>they're valuable because they are all these things, not just

0:23:48.070 --> 0:23:51.250
<v S1>what they can do for a corporation. And so my

0:23:51.250 --> 0:23:54.070
<v S1>thoughts on this are like, because you have to start wondering,

0:23:54.070 --> 0:23:57.700
<v S1>when you listen to the Leopold and Aakash conversation, it's like,

0:23:57.700 --> 0:24:01.420
<v S1>is human 3.0 in danger? Are we in danger of

0:24:01.420 --> 0:24:05.890
<v S1>losing a world where humans exist and do what they

0:24:05.890 --> 0:24:08.860
<v S1>do for other humans? Because AC is going to take

0:24:08.859 --> 0:24:12.940
<v S1>over and whatever turn us into whatever. Maybe, hopefully? Well,

0:24:12.940 --> 0:24:16.810
<v S1>I'm pushing for a possible AGI or a that allows

0:24:16.810 --> 0:24:20.410
<v S1>us to do human 3.0 either. It would be kind

0:24:20.410 --> 0:24:22.780
<v S1>of scary if it just took over and implemented it.

0:24:22.780 --> 0:24:25.359
<v S1>That would be scary. Hopefully it would arrive at something

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:29.200
<v S1>like human 3.0 and keep us alive and thriving. Or

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:31.690
<v S1>it doesn't take over. It's still used as a tool,

0:24:31.690 --> 0:24:35.260
<v S1>but it's in the hands of someone somewhat benign like

0:24:35.260 --> 0:24:40.540
<v S1>the US, hopefully remains benign. And at that point we

0:24:40.570 --> 0:24:44.920
<v S1>we basically give it the criteria of help us maintain

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:47.859
<v S1>a society in which we move towards and maintain something

0:24:47.859 --> 0:24:51.010
<v S1>like human 3.0. Another thing I'm really worried about is

0:24:51.010 --> 0:24:54.910
<v S1>like how immigration will affect UBI. So if the government

0:24:54.910 --> 0:24:58.570
<v S1>is basically the jobs are gone, no, very few people

0:24:58.570 --> 0:25:01.660
<v S1>can do something that I can't. And that's like, whatever 10%

0:25:01.660 --> 0:25:04.270
<v S1>of the world or 1% of the world, or 25%

0:25:04.270 --> 0:25:08.230
<v S1>of the world, whatever. Different times, different numbers, different ways

0:25:08.230 --> 0:25:11.710
<v S1>of measuring. But let's say it's 10% and the other 90%

0:25:11.710 --> 0:25:15.670
<v S1>just aren't employable because, like Harari said, you know, they're

0:25:15.670 --> 0:25:18.070
<v S1>a useless class. They have nothing that they can offer

0:25:18.070 --> 0:25:20.979
<v S1>the economy. And this is human 2.0. Still, this is

0:25:20.980 --> 0:25:25.030
<v S1>not crossed over into this hopeful land of human 3.0.

0:25:25.030 --> 0:25:28.180
<v S1>In the meantime, I mean, because some people, like Leopold

0:25:28.180 --> 0:25:31.570
<v S1>are worried about ASI happening in like a number of

0:25:31.570 --> 0:25:36.520
<v S1>years and just like completely redoing society and the government's

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:38.320
<v S1>obviously going to have to be involved there. They're going

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:42.040
<v S1>to have to pay people to basically not riot, not

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:48.100
<v S1>kill themselves and, you know, provide education, provide gaming, provide entertainment,

0:25:48.100 --> 0:25:52.210
<v S1>provide something some sort of basis for meaning that's going

0:25:52.210 --> 0:25:55.270
<v S1>to have to be included. But what does that look like?

0:25:55.270 --> 0:25:58.960
<v S1>I mean, there's like a welfare state and there's like

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:01.750
<v S1>the the government's giving out too much money, and then

0:26:01.750 --> 0:26:04.540
<v S1>there's a whole nother level when it's actually UBI, because

0:26:04.540 --> 0:26:07.630
<v S1>no one's even able to work. Right. It's not that

0:26:07.630 --> 0:26:11.170
<v S1>they can't find a job when when people are actually hiring,

0:26:11.170 --> 0:26:13.780
<v S1>it's like, no. Nobody's hiring. All the work's being done

0:26:13.780 --> 0:26:18.490
<v S1>by AI or whatever, 90%, and AI is producing trillions

0:26:18.490 --> 0:26:22.060
<v S1>of dollars in value. And that raises another question. Okay,

0:26:22.060 --> 0:26:24.730
<v S1>you're making all this new stuff. You have all these

0:26:24.730 --> 0:26:29.020
<v S1>new creators, you have all this new AI generated productivity

0:26:29.140 --> 0:26:34.020
<v S1>and products and services. For who? Who's buying the stuff?

0:26:34.050 --> 0:26:36.929
<v S1>Who's buying the stuff? If the top 10% are the

0:26:36.930 --> 0:26:40.320
<v S1>only ones who can make things and sell things. Who's

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:44.010
<v S1>buying the stuff? And the natural answer looks like, which

0:26:44.010 --> 0:26:49.140
<v S1>is quite gross. It's like, I guess the government taxes

0:26:49.140 --> 0:26:52.439
<v S1>all the income that's being made. Again, where's the income

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:55.470
<v S1>coming from? It's almost like there's an exchange between the

0:26:55.470 --> 0:26:59.220
<v S1>government and the producers, and the producers are making all

0:26:59.220 --> 0:27:01.679
<v S1>this awesome stuff. The government is using all the awesome

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:04.770
<v S1>stuff to generate all these awesome things. But then the

0:27:04.770 --> 0:27:07.590
<v S1>government has to take this money, which is very strange

0:27:07.590 --> 0:27:09.990
<v S1>word for it now, because it's not being generated by

0:27:09.990 --> 0:27:13.320
<v S1>the people and being taxed by the government. In fact,

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:16.860
<v S1>it's like it's just a money idea. The money idea

0:27:16.859 --> 0:27:21.389
<v S1>goes to the government. The government then gives the population money,

0:27:21.390 --> 0:27:24.179
<v S1>the ability to purchase these goods and services, which are

0:27:24.180 --> 0:27:27.210
<v S1>being generated by the small percentage of the population to

0:27:27.210 --> 0:27:30.870
<v S1>the tune of whatever trillions of trillions upon trillions of dollars.

0:27:30.869 --> 0:27:33.150
<v S1>And then they give that money out to the people

0:27:33.150 --> 0:27:35.700
<v S1>and the people that can then use that to buy

0:27:35.700 --> 0:27:38.399
<v S1>the services that are being made by this 10%. And

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:41.970
<v S1>that feels very not quite Ponzi, but like shell game,

0:27:41.970 --> 0:27:44.940
<v S1>it's like, oh, it's fake money. We're moving it around.

0:27:44.940 --> 0:27:48.149
<v S1>It just feels very strange when when the, the human

0:27:48.150 --> 0:27:53.700
<v S1>population is not producing not participating in that creation. Now

0:27:53.700 --> 0:27:57.510
<v S1>in human 3.0, I think they will be I'm not

0:27:57.510 --> 0:27:59.970
<v S1>sure exactly what that economy will look like. I'm sure

0:27:59.970 --> 0:28:03.090
<v S1>much smarter people can help me think about that. It's

0:28:03.090 --> 0:28:07.080
<v S1>essentially more of a human to human exchange barter system.

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:10.470
<v S1>Obviously a currency like a maybe like a doctor, a

0:28:10.590 --> 0:28:13.740
<v S1>coffee type of currency or something. But you can also

0:28:13.740 --> 0:28:16.710
<v S1>buy regular goods and services, but you could also pay

0:28:16.710 --> 0:28:20.190
<v S1>people for making you happy or whatever. Like a lot

0:28:20.190 --> 0:28:22.200
<v S1>of people will be creating art and doing lots of

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:25.169
<v S1>stuff like that. So I'm hoping there's a large economy

0:28:25.170 --> 0:28:28.080
<v S1>for sharing on this full spectrum that we talked about

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:31.650
<v S1>with human 3.0, and that will involve money and stuff

0:28:31.650 --> 0:28:34.740
<v S1>like that. But what I'm talking about here is really

0:28:34.740 --> 0:28:38.040
<v S1>human 2.0 stuff. This is like this year, next year,

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:40.530
<v S1>the next five years, the next ten years, you know,

0:28:40.530 --> 0:28:42.360
<v S1>what do we do in the meantime with all these

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:45.240
<v S1>people who are going to be needing money? I mean,

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:49.200
<v S1>what happens with an economy with millions of immigrants who

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:54.780
<v S1>are undocumented, who have families, they need to feed them,

0:28:54.780 --> 0:28:57.120
<v S1>they need to house them. And what if the government

0:28:57.120 --> 0:28:59.790
<v S1>is like, well, what if the jobs go away? Well,

0:28:59.790 --> 0:29:02.430
<v S1>maybe they leave. Maybe they don't leave, though, and they're

0:29:02.430 --> 0:29:05.340
<v S1>very angry because they can no longer get work, and

0:29:05.340 --> 0:29:09.180
<v S1>they're also not being paid like the local citizens. I

0:29:09.180 --> 0:29:12.270
<v S1>don't know what the solution here is, but it's I'm

0:29:12.270 --> 0:29:14.130
<v S1>saying we need to think about it. So my thoughts

0:29:14.130 --> 0:29:18.810
<v S1>on conscious AI are, I think, fairly simple actually. I

0:29:18.810 --> 0:29:21.960
<v S1>think the way humans got consciousness is that it was

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:25.979
<v S1>adaptive for helping us accelerate evolution. So basically winning and

0:29:25.980 --> 0:29:29.790
<v S1>losing is what powers, evolution, blame and praise are smaller

0:29:29.790 --> 0:29:33.330
<v S1>versions of winning and losing plants and insects win and

0:29:33.330 --> 0:29:37.770
<v S1>lose as well, evolutionarily, but it seems like only humans

0:29:37.770 --> 0:29:40.380
<v S1>and a few other species. And maybe it's a lot,

0:29:40.380 --> 0:29:44.820
<v S1>but it's a subset. Very small subset, have subjective experiences,

0:29:44.820 --> 0:29:47.760
<v S1>and it's not clear that anyone else other than humans

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:50.970
<v S1>has like blame and praise. Well, maybe dogs do. I

0:29:50.970 --> 0:29:55.020
<v S1>feel like they understand, blame and praise. Good boy, bad girl, right?

0:29:55.020 --> 0:29:57.870
<v S1>I feel like that works based on their facial expressions.

0:29:57.870 --> 0:30:00.960
<v S1>Who knows if that's right. But anyway, bottom line is

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:05.940
<v S1>blame and praise might empower evolution if we experience winning

0:30:05.940 --> 0:30:10.020
<v S1>and losing, being blamed and praised and feeling that at

0:30:10.020 --> 0:30:14.970
<v S1>a visceral level versus having no inter like immediate repercussions

0:30:14.970 --> 0:30:17.790
<v S1>of not doing well. So maybe evolution still gets you

0:30:17.790 --> 0:30:22.380
<v S1>there if you don't have blame and praise and subjective experience.

0:30:22.380 --> 0:30:26.340
<v S1>But I think this whole kind of container is how

0:30:26.340 --> 0:30:29.430
<v S1>we ended up being conscious, because it enables this, which

0:30:29.430 --> 0:30:33.300
<v S1>makes evolution better. That that's my guess. If that's right,

0:30:33.300 --> 0:30:37.440
<v S1>then consciousness might have simply emerged from evolution as our

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:41.040
<v S1>brains got bigger and we became better at getting better,

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:47.670
<v S1>which means it could emerge naturally through like self similar loops,

0:30:47.670 --> 0:30:51.030
<v S1>definitely some RL related stuff. Or we could kind of

0:30:51.030 --> 0:30:53.340
<v S1>just like hack the system and like add it on

0:30:53.340 --> 0:30:56.610
<v S1>and be like, hey, develop this so that you can

0:30:56.610 --> 0:30:59.280
<v S1>have this advantage or whatever. We can try to shortcut

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:02.250
<v S1>what evolution did over millions of years. Yeah. And then

0:31:02.250 --> 0:31:05.490
<v S1>one question is like, well, if we hacked it that way,

0:31:05.490 --> 0:31:08.250
<v S1>would it be real consciousness? And me as a materialist,

0:31:08.250 --> 0:31:11.670
<v S1>I'm like, well, what is real consciousness like? I think

0:31:11.670 --> 0:31:15.330
<v S1>at some level it's all an illusion anyway. But practically,

0:31:15.330 --> 0:31:19.980
<v S1>if you feel yourself feeling and it hurts, that's real, right?

0:31:19.980 --> 0:31:24.420
<v S1>It doesn't matter how mechanistic the substrate below actually is,

0:31:24.420 --> 0:31:27.570
<v S1>because at some point you can pick along the way

0:31:27.570 --> 0:31:30.780
<v S1>and just be like, this is mechanical, this is mechanical. This.

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:35.360
<v S1>A mechanical. Therefore it's all mechanical. Doesn't matter. Friendship still

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:38.630
<v S1>is awesome. Love is awesome. Ice cream is awesome. Doesn't

0:31:38.630 --> 0:31:41.360
<v S1>make it any less awesome than it's made out of atoms, right?

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:45.800
<v S1>So my AC prediction I'm ferm on my AGI prediction

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:51.890
<v S1>of 2025 and 2028. Somewhere in there, 2026 2027 is

0:31:51.890 --> 0:31:54.590
<v S1>like ideal, the sweet spot for me. I'm going to

0:31:54.590 --> 0:32:01.100
<v S1>give soft prediction, soft prediction of AC 2027 to 31.

0:32:01.100 --> 0:32:04.760
<v S1>So what is that. That's three four plus two. So

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:08.210
<v S1>that's roughly 2029. Don't feel great about it. That's like

0:32:08.210 --> 0:32:12.440
<v S1>a 30 to 40% prediction like confidence level. This one

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:17.810
<v S1>I'm saying 90% by 2028. End of 2028 I'm saying

0:32:17.810 --> 0:32:21.080
<v S1>like 60% by end of 2025. So I feel a

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:24.200
<v S1>lot more confident about that one. But who knows. Predictions

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:27.080
<v S1>are hard, especially when they're about the future. Niels Bohr

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:30.560
<v S1>said that. All right, unifying thoughts. Leopold, you want to

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:35.390
<v S1>watch him on AI safety? Completely. Absolutely impressive guy. And

0:32:35.390 --> 0:32:37.190
<v S1>you want to go read his essays that are released

0:32:37.190 --> 0:32:40.520
<v S1>on this as well. Talked to Aakash Patel is becoming

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:43.910
<v S1>one of my favorite podcasters ever right now. He is

0:32:43.910 --> 0:32:49.430
<v S1>basically an autodidact. He's a crazy reader. When Dwarkesh talks

0:32:49.430 --> 0:32:53.420
<v S1>to Cowan or Cowan, that's how he pronounces it Tyler Cowan.

0:32:53.420 --> 0:32:57.410
<v S1>When they talk, they jump around, they're like, oh yeah,

0:32:57.410 --> 0:32:59.360
<v S1>you know, I was I was knitting this thing the

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:01.820
<v S1>other day and I was working. I was, you know,

0:33:01.820 --> 0:33:06.230
<v S1>making wood figurines on my lathe in the back backyard.

0:33:06.230 --> 0:33:09.230
<v S1>And I was thinking about, you know, whatever, Roman history.

0:33:09.230 --> 0:33:12.260
<v S1>And then I was thinking about, you know, Adam's economics.

0:33:12.260 --> 0:33:15.470
<v S1>And that reminds me of this one poem by Rilke

0:33:15.470 --> 0:33:18.020
<v S1>or whatever. And they just jump from here to there

0:33:18.020 --> 0:33:20.090
<v S1>and they're like, oh, that reminds me of this. Hey,

0:33:20.090 --> 0:33:22.490
<v S1>what about World War Two? And this thing happened and

0:33:22.490 --> 0:33:24.860
<v S1>they're just jumping from place to place and like, I

0:33:24.860 --> 0:33:26.810
<v S1>feel like I'm pretty good at that. I feel like

0:33:26.810 --> 0:33:31.070
<v S1>that's one of my superpowers. But Cowan, seeing Cowan do this,

0:33:31.070 --> 0:33:35.030
<v S1>it is insane. And Dwarkesh is like a mini Cowan.

0:33:35.030 --> 0:33:38.210
<v S1>He's like coming up so fast. It's the reason that

0:33:38.210 --> 0:33:42.740
<v S1>his interviews are so good. He's, like, fiercely curious and

0:33:42.740 --> 0:33:46.880
<v S1>an autodidact, reading, like, whatever, 12 books a second, whatever

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:51.980
<v S1>his current metric is, it's insane. Anyway. Follow them. It's really,

0:33:51.980 --> 0:33:56.720
<v S1>really good stuff. And human 3.0. My best optimism here

0:33:56.720 --> 0:33:59.840
<v S1>is we get AGI, but we don't get AC for

0:33:59.840 --> 0:34:02.180
<v S1>a while, which will give us a chance to hopefully

0:34:02.180 --> 0:34:05.810
<v S1>move towards 3.0 or we get AC, but it's like

0:34:05.810 --> 0:34:09.320
<v S1>controlled by the US and or benign US actors and

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:14.720
<v S1>we move towards human 3.0 or AC comes online, it's

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:17.960
<v S1>benign and it kind of takes over and it builds

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:21.260
<v S1>human 3.0 because that's the best future for humanity or

0:34:21.260 --> 0:34:23.900
<v S1>something that looks similar. Right. And this is what I

0:34:23.900 --> 0:34:27.020
<v S1>was saying before. I don't actually care how unlikely these

0:34:27.020 --> 0:34:31.610
<v S1>scenarios are, because it's kind of the only good path

0:34:31.610 --> 0:34:34.220
<v S1>that I could see happening from all this AI stuff

0:34:34.219 --> 0:34:39.330
<v S1>is we eventually get to human 3.0. A human world

0:34:39.330 --> 0:34:42.930
<v S1>for humans, and I would say future versions of humans,

0:34:42.930 --> 0:34:46.350
<v S1>which might be hybrids with AI or whatever. But you

0:34:46.350 --> 0:34:49.109
<v S1>got to maintain the humanity. We got to be doing

0:34:49.110 --> 0:34:52.440
<v S1>what we're doing for humans, not for the sake of tech.

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:55.770
<v S1>So I'm optimistic about that. I am trying to help

0:34:55.770 --> 0:34:57.989
<v S1>build that. That's my whole purpose in, like doing all

0:34:57.989 --> 0:35:01.680
<v S1>of this so that that's what I'm shooting for. And

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:04.050
<v S1>I don't care if it's a 20% chance of us

0:35:04.050 --> 0:35:06.120
<v S1>getting there. First of all, nobody can know what this

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:09.239
<v S1>number is, so it doesn't really matter. But second of all,

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:12.060
<v S1>if it's a 10% chance, guess what? I'm shooting for

0:35:12.060 --> 0:35:14.280
<v S1>the 10%. I'm trying to make it 11. Try to

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:17.040
<v S1>make it a 50, whatever. Try to make it a 90.

0:35:17.070 --> 0:35:19.740
<v S1>If it's a 60% chance and it's a 40% chance,

0:35:19.739 --> 0:35:21.690
<v S1>we're all going to die. Whatever. I'm not going to

0:35:21.690 --> 0:35:25.049
<v S1>sit around thinking about the 40%. I mean, that's my vibe.

0:35:25.050 --> 0:35:29.160
<v S1>I am shooting for human 3.0. And if someone's like, yeah, well,

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:31.200
<v S1>you don't know, China can take it over and blah

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:33.570
<v S1>blah blah, AC and it can kill us all and

0:35:33.570 --> 0:35:38.190
<v S1>whatever paper clips and I just don't see the value

0:35:38.190 --> 0:35:42.630
<v S1>of going hard down the path of like, the doomers

0:35:42.630 --> 0:35:46.590
<v S1>because let's say they're right. Their answer is turn it off,

0:35:46.590 --> 0:35:50.760
<v S1>don't build it. That's not going to happen. Next answer.

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:52.890
<v S1>They're like, I don't have a next answer. We should

0:35:52.890 --> 0:35:55.050
<v S1>stop talking about this. We should stop building it. You

0:35:55.050 --> 0:35:57.510
<v S1>have exited yourself from the adult table. You are no

0:35:57.510 --> 0:36:01.799
<v S1>longer in the conversation because of Moloch. We are building this.

0:36:01.800 --> 0:36:05.640
<v S1>It is happening. We are running full speed with scissors

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:08.520
<v S1>in both hands. And there's nothing we can do to

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:11.550
<v S1>stop that. My argument is, the only thing we could

0:36:11.550 --> 0:36:14.280
<v S1>do is try to aim it in a good direction.

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:17.400
<v S1>Try to point towards human 3.0 and that's what I'm

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:22.319
<v S1>trying to do. All right, huge diversion, but worth talking about.

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:25.530
<v S1>That was the AI piece collection of thoughts and predictions

0:36:25.530 --> 0:36:29.669
<v S1>about AI. June of 2024. All right. Security got a

0:36:29.670 --> 0:36:35.070
<v S1>whole bunch of misinformation sneaking into like, little man stuffed news.

0:36:35.070 --> 0:36:38.460
<v S1>So this is like manosphere, like podcasts or whatever, or

0:36:38.460 --> 0:36:44.790
<v S1>news sites or whatever. They're actually republishing Russian propaganda network content.

0:36:44.790 --> 0:36:47.490
<v S1>So it's like, yeah, it can seep in and go

0:36:47.489 --> 0:36:49.710
<v S1>lots of different places. This is why you actually need

0:36:49.739 --> 0:36:53.580
<v S1>AI to be watching everything. And basically when a new

0:36:53.580 --> 0:36:59.069
<v S1>information or disinformation or misinformation propaganda campaign comes out, when

0:36:59.070 --> 0:37:02.940
<v S1>it comes out, we should categorize, okay, what the core

0:37:02.940 --> 0:37:06.630
<v S1>concept is, the core idea. It's trying to spread with AI,

0:37:06.630 --> 0:37:09.900
<v S1>and then you monitor all the different stories coming out.

0:37:09.900 --> 0:37:14.580
<v S1>It might be like Saskatchewan news from South Parish, you know,

0:37:14.580 --> 0:37:19.080
<v S1>Wisconsin or whatever. And they're spreading the same story, because

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:21.480
<v S1>what the attackers will do is they'll figure out, okay,

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:24.000
<v S1>where can we get it in? Where can we push

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:26.550
<v S1>this narrative? And maybe, maybe the front door is closed,

0:37:26.550 --> 0:37:29.730
<v S1>but maybe there's a thousand different backdoors. That was that one.

0:37:29.730 --> 0:37:32.610
<v S1>TikTok had an issue with DMs. There was a zero

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:34.980
<v S1>day in DMs where you click it and open it.

0:37:34.980 --> 0:37:39.090
<v S1>It's pretty bad. The current tactic for what? You basically

0:37:39.090 --> 0:37:43.170
<v S1>get compromised for compromise of your TikTok. If you did that,

0:37:43.170 --> 0:37:47.100
<v S1>and a new tactic TikTok is using to avoid the

0:37:47.100 --> 0:37:50.219
<v S1>lawsuit is basically to say they're going to build out

0:37:50.219 --> 0:37:53.310
<v S1>a separate algorithm and separate data just for us. So

0:37:53.310 --> 0:37:55.830
<v S1>we'll see if that works. New paper claims that GPT

0:37:55.830 --> 0:38:00.480
<v S1>four can autonomously hack zero day vulnerabilities. 53% success rate

0:38:00.510 --> 0:38:01.920
<v S1>going to be a lot of these papers. A lot

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:04.380
<v S1>of these papers are not very good. A lot of

0:38:04.380 --> 0:38:07.440
<v S1>them are decent. I will keep reading and posting these

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:10.770
<v S1>when the claims are interesting and they're from decent outfits,

0:38:10.770 --> 0:38:13.680
<v S1>but you want to watch the quality of the paper

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:17.580
<v S1>very closely. Look, especially for how much of their testing

0:38:17.580 --> 0:38:20.250
<v S1>methodology that they publish. Did they show exactly what they

0:38:20.250 --> 0:38:22.380
<v S1>tried against these different things? Did they show all the

0:38:22.380 --> 0:38:25.890
<v S1>different examples? Did they, you know, give you all the

0:38:25.890 --> 0:38:29.220
<v S1>stuff to do the replication? If not, then they're kind

0:38:29.219 --> 0:38:31.410
<v S1>of like hiding the ball and you can't really trust

0:38:31.410 --> 0:38:35.550
<v S1>their score. And we got to analyze paper fabric pattern

0:38:35.550 --> 0:38:37.200
<v S1>that you can use for this. And when I ran

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:39.840
<v S1>it against this one it got a six on rigor

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:44.969
<v S1>benchmark and Ablations look good but some details missing and

0:38:44.969 --> 0:38:48.750
<v S1>stats lacking. That's why that's why we have fabric. Okay

0:38:48.750 --> 0:38:53.339
<v S1>Chinese drone photographer got snagged by the US Espionage Act

0:38:53.340 --> 0:38:58.410
<v S1>taking pics of military shipyards. So there's another thing that's

0:38:58.410 --> 0:39:00.690
<v S1>being talked about right now with China buying up a

0:39:00.690 --> 0:39:04.410
<v S1>whole bunch of land right next to military bases, they're

0:39:04.410 --> 0:39:07.680
<v S1>buying like massive amounts of farmland, and they start setting

0:39:07.680 --> 0:39:09.629
<v S1>up all this gear. It's like, oh, don't pay any

0:39:09.630 --> 0:39:12.600
<v S1>attention to us. We're just building some stuff over here.

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:16.350
<v S1>So I hope Biden or Trump or whoever just like,

0:39:16.350 --> 0:39:20.009
<v S1>finds a list of these. And just like search and seizure,

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:23.279
<v S1>good bye. Do not pass go. And maybe some of

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:27.270
<v S1>those are benign, right. But I have to basically be like, well,

0:39:27.270 --> 0:39:33.210
<v S1>based on the, you know, 9566, you know, fucking billion

0:39:33.210 --> 0:39:37.210
<v S1>times that you've actually tried to steal from us. And

0:39:37.210 --> 0:39:40.779
<v S1>actually hacked us, then you know you're going to lose

0:39:40.780 --> 0:39:43.180
<v S1>some for the home team when you're actually doing something

0:39:43.180 --> 0:39:46.239
<v S1>benign and actually just setting up a farm next to

0:39:46.239 --> 0:39:49.239
<v S1>a military base on accident. And they didn't actually mean

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:52.480
<v S1>anything by that. Too bad you ruined your reputation. Therefore

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:55.480
<v S1>get out. Okay. OpenAI revealed that its AI tech was

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:59.290
<v S1>used by Russia and China for sneaky influence ops. Yeah,

0:39:59.290 --> 0:40:02.109
<v S1>they've said this a few times and I like it.

0:40:02.110 --> 0:40:05.890
<v S1>I like the transparency. They're basically like, look, this keeps happening.

0:40:05.890 --> 0:40:07.960
<v S1>We keep catching it and we're going to try to

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:13.210
<v S1>do better. All right. WWDC keynote got an analysis here.

0:40:13.210 --> 0:40:16.660
<v S1>This is a fabric analysis from a TechCrunch article. As

0:40:16.660 --> 0:40:19.450
<v S1>I talked about before, Apple basically killed the AI thing.

0:40:19.450 --> 0:40:21.460
<v S1>They also did a bunch of really cool stuff. One

0:40:21.460 --> 0:40:23.170
<v S1>of the things is you bring your phone next to

0:40:23.170 --> 0:40:26.140
<v S1>someone else, you can transfer them cash. I've been waiting

0:40:26.140 --> 0:40:29.020
<v S1>that for that forever. Problem is, a lot of people

0:40:29.020 --> 0:40:32.470
<v S1>won't have that feature turned on, or they'll have an

0:40:32.500 --> 0:40:35.110
<v S1>Android and you won't be able to do it like so.

0:40:35.110 --> 0:40:38.080
<v S1>A lot of people are switching to like Zelle or Venmo.

0:40:38.110 --> 0:40:42.400
<v S1>I don't like Venmo, and Zelle is slow. Whatever. I

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:45.430
<v S1>wish more people had the ability to do these swipey

0:40:45.430 --> 0:40:49.330
<v S1>things and Apple things, but kind of rude to require

0:40:49.330 --> 0:40:52.149
<v S1>that everyone has an iPhone, right? I mean, that's just

0:40:52.150 --> 0:40:54.700
<v S1>not realistic and also not cool. All right. All the

0:40:54.700 --> 0:41:00.190
<v S1>different startups that Apple killed today always fun. After WWDC

0:41:00.190 --> 0:41:05.620
<v S1>or an OpenAI event, US needs 225,000 more cybersecurity workers.

0:41:05.620 --> 0:41:09.489
<v S1>I never trust numbers like this because it's hard to know. Like,

0:41:09.489 --> 0:41:12.610
<v S1>what are they asking? Are they asking it right? What

0:41:12.610 --> 0:41:15.190
<v S1>are the questions that they accept? Like, I just feel

0:41:15.190 --> 0:41:17.470
<v S1>like the numbers are bad. I feel like that number

0:41:17.469 --> 0:41:19.720
<v S1>is going to go down because of AI, and I

0:41:19.719 --> 0:41:21.790
<v S1>feel like it's going to go up because of AI.

0:41:21.820 --> 0:41:23.860
<v S1>So it's going to go down because of AI, because

0:41:23.860 --> 0:41:26.320
<v S1>the jobs are going to get easier to do without people,

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:29.859
<v S1>but so much more stuff is going to get made

0:41:29.860 --> 0:41:33.340
<v S1>that we're just going to be injecting insecurity into the world,

0:41:33.340 --> 0:41:36.010
<v S1>especially when it's like getting made with AI. So it's

0:41:36.010 --> 0:41:38.439
<v S1>like AI going in, building a bunch of stuff and

0:41:38.440 --> 0:41:40.750
<v S1>have that stuff's going to be really nasty in terms

0:41:40.750 --> 0:41:43.810
<v S1>of security vulnerabilities. So it's like still going to need

0:41:43.810 --> 0:41:48.489
<v S1>people for a while. Like assuming all this AI replacement

0:41:48.489 --> 0:41:51.759
<v S1>stuff goes really, really fast. We're still talking about years

0:41:51.760 --> 0:41:55.719
<v S1>and years. I mean, super fast for like an 80%

0:41:55.719 --> 0:41:59.770
<v S1>replacement of all jobs, super fast. And these are crazy

0:41:59.770 --> 0:42:03.370
<v S1>numbers I'm just throwing out. But but like Nuclear fast

0:42:03.370 --> 0:42:06.969
<v S1>is like ten years now as far as starting and

0:42:06.969 --> 0:42:10.089
<v S1>actually having major impact, I think it's already starting and

0:42:10.090 --> 0:42:12.820
<v S1>it's already like a year or two from now we're

0:42:12.820 --> 0:42:14.800
<v S1>going to start feeling it. So I think that's going

0:42:14.800 --> 0:42:18.100
<v S1>to be really fast. There's going to be a regulatory response.

0:42:18.100 --> 0:42:21.790
<v S1>It's slow to make any change in any organization, and

0:42:21.790 --> 0:42:24.550
<v S1>the bigger and more bureaucratic it is, the slower it

0:42:24.550 --> 0:42:27.940
<v S1>will be. So just because something could happen in a

0:42:27.940 --> 0:42:31.000
<v S1>year or six months doesn't mean it will. And it's

0:42:31.000 --> 0:42:33.730
<v S1>more likely to happen in 2 or 3 or 4

0:42:33.730 --> 0:42:37.030
<v S1>or 10 years. Got to keep that in mind. It's

0:42:37.030 --> 0:42:39.400
<v S1>going to go very fast. It's going to go faster

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:41.830
<v S1>than you think and slower than you think both at

0:42:41.830 --> 0:42:45.160
<v S1>the same time. Apple just hit the three. $3 trillion

0:42:45.160 --> 0:42:48.399
<v S1>mark again. But Nvidia jumped ahead. And now Nvidia is

0:42:48.400 --> 0:42:52.750
<v S1>even more valuable than Apple. And Microsoft is still number

0:42:52.750 --> 0:42:57.520
<v S1>one insane. Such as killing it over there. Cartwheel tool

0:42:57.550 --> 0:43:02.320
<v S1>olama CLE wire JS for us for UI design shade

0:43:02.320 --> 0:43:06.040
<v S1>map project that turns every mountain building and tree shadow

0:43:06.040 --> 0:43:08.800
<v S1>for any date and time. How to think like a

0:43:08.800 --> 0:43:13.510
<v S1>computer scientist. Pretty cool. Uh, interactive edition here. Starship just

0:43:13.510 --> 0:43:16.810
<v S1>landed its first one. Like all the other ones either

0:43:16.810 --> 0:43:19.300
<v S1>blew up on the way out or, uh, blew up

0:43:19.300 --> 0:43:23.080
<v S1>on the way in, but he finally landed one very impressive,

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:29.830
<v S1>I think 5000 tons. So that's what, £20,000? Five times two, £2,000.

0:43:29.830 --> 0:43:33.730
<v S1>2000 times 5000. Holy crap, that's a lot of pounds.

0:43:33.730 --> 0:43:38.290
<v S1>World's largest solar farm just went online. Three point gigawatt

0:43:38.290 --> 0:43:42.219
<v S1>Marty just went live in China. Okay, here's my question.

0:43:42.219 --> 0:43:45.969
<v S1>Why can't we build like ten of these in the US? Okay,

0:43:45.969 --> 0:43:48.880
<v S1>we know we need all this power for AI. So

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:52.510
<v S1>I say we go Biden. Trump does this. You basically

0:43:52.510 --> 0:43:54.430
<v S1>go to each state and be like, look, I need

0:43:54.430 --> 0:43:59.860
<v S1>you to build 3.5GW in your state within five years.

0:43:59.860 --> 0:44:02.080
<v S1>And they're like, yeah, that's impossible. We'd have to hire

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:04.930
<v S1>all these people. And the government's like, whatever. I mean,

0:44:04.930 --> 0:44:07.839
<v S1>we have money printers, so we're just going to print

0:44:07.840 --> 0:44:10.900
<v S1>all this money, we're going to inject it into the economy.

0:44:10.900 --> 0:44:15.100
<v S1>Most importantly, giving it to these training programs will, which

0:44:15.100 --> 0:44:17.140
<v S1>will train the people how to build the wind farms

0:44:17.140 --> 0:44:20.739
<v S1>and the solar farms, whatever the best renewable energy is

0:44:20.739 --> 0:44:24.520
<v S1>for that particular state, like Nevada should build like 100

0:44:24.520 --> 0:44:27.430
<v S1>of these things for for sun. I mean, I fly

0:44:27.430 --> 0:44:30.129
<v S1>over it all the time. There's nothing there. In fact,

0:44:30.130 --> 0:44:33.070
<v S1>you fly over the entire United States. There's nothing there.

0:44:33.070 --> 0:44:36.010
<v S1>It's all empty. And meanwhile the sun just hits it

0:44:36.010 --> 0:44:39.920
<v S1>every day. Like nine times out of ten. For every

0:44:39.920 --> 0:44:42.319
<v S1>day of the year the sun comes up. In fact,

0:44:42.320 --> 0:44:44.480
<v S1>I think it might be higher than 90% when the

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:47.120
<v S1>sun comes up. In fact, it might be 100%. The

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:49.910
<v S1>sun always comes up and it is hitting us with

0:44:49.910 --> 0:44:53.630
<v S1>like so much energy. And we just it soaks in,

0:44:53.630 --> 0:44:57.890
<v S1>you know, goes off into the atmosphere. Capture it. Okay, look,

0:44:57.890 --> 0:45:00.140
<v S1>we've got people who don't have jobs and don't have

0:45:00.140 --> 0:45:02.510
<v S1>meaning in their lives. We know that AI is going

0:45:02.510 --> 0:45:05.359
<v S1>to require all this power. So millions of people have

0:45:05.360 --> 0:45:07.310
<v S1>no meaning in their lives because they don't have work.

0:45:07.310 --> 0:45:10.790
<v S1>We talk about the loss of manufacturing jobs. Go build

0:45:10.790 --> 0:45:13.940
<v S1>all these solar panels, go build all these solar plants,

0:45:13.940 --> 0:45:16.700
<v S1>have the people working there. Eventually they'll be replaced by

0:45:16.700 --> 0:45:19.460
<v S1>robots in AI. That's fine. That'll take time like we

0:45:19.460 --> 0:45:23.210
<v S1>talked about before. In the meantime, let's go build 100

0:45:23.210 --> 0:45:29.270
<v S1>of these, whatever, 3.5GW facilities or ten gigawatt facilities, whatever.

0:45:29.270 --> 0:45:34.040
<v S1>Giant solar farms, giant wind farms. And we put millions

0:45:34.040 --> 0:45:37.069
<v S1>of people to work, which gives them meaning, and they're

0:45:37.070 --> 0:45:39.859
<v S1>building towards a renewable future. So, like, even if I

0:45:39.860 --> 0:45:42.740
<v S1>didn't happen whatever, we got renewable energy. Now we can

0:45:42.739 --> 0:45:44.960
<v S1>export that energy, we can sell it other places. We

0:45:44.960 --> 0:45:47.810
<v S1>just have it for whatever purpose. And you have to

0:45:47.810 --> 0:45:49.670
<v S1>build the pipelines as well, right? You got to get

0:45:49.670 --> 0:45:51.890
<v S1>that energy to where it needs to go. So that's

0:45:51.890 --> 0:45:56.360
<v S1>like pipes, cables, like, you know, wires, all that stuff,

0:45:56.360 --> 0:46:00.020
<v S1>all the infrastructure for moving energy. Where's the downside here?

0:46:00.020 --> 0:46:04.190
<v S1>It's win win jobs and and tons of energy and

0:46:04.190 --> 0:46:07.460
<v S1>no reliance on external energy. And we get to move

0:46:07.460 --> 0:46:10.969
<v S1>on AI faster. So really bothers me when I see

0:46:10.969 --> 0:46:15.080
<v S1>China understanding this and building so quickly. And we're like, man,

0:46:15.110 --> 0:46:18.350
<v S1>let's fight with each other instead. Oh, in nuclear, nuclear

0:46:18.350 --> 0:46:21.590
<v S1>is the other one. Okay, so USA's although I prefer solar,

0:46:21.590 --> 0:46:24.770
<v S1>but someone knows better than me. USA's solar panel manufacturing

0:46:24.770 --> 0:46:28.610
<v S1>capacity jumped by 71%. I like it, I like it.

0:46:28.610 --> 0:46:31.820
<v S1>Florida and Texas are leading. Let's go. What about Nevada?

0:46:31.820 --> 0:46:34.580
<v S1>Where are you at? Florida. Forget about it. It rains

0:46:34.580 --> 0:46:36.320
<v S1>all the time and it's sinking. It's not going to

0:46:36.320 --> 0:46:39.530
<v S1>work out. I guess Florida's energy generation would have to

0:46:39.530 --> 0:46:42.680
<v S1>be based on, like being flooded or winds. No, you

0:46:42.680 --> 0:46:45.469
<v S1>can't do can't do wind farms and hurricanes. That would

0:46:45.469 --> 0:46:48.500
<v S1>be a bit rough. All right. Humans. David Brooks argues

0:46:48.500 --> 0:46:51.110
<v S1>that progressive energy has shifted from the working class to

0:46:51.110 --> 0:46:55.340
<v S1>elite universities, making them more left leaning than ever. Points

0:46:55.340 --> 0:46:59.239
<v S1>to protests and progressive opinions. Yeah, it's all bad. Highly

0:46:59.239 --> 0:47:02.779
<v S1>recommend you read David Brooks stuff The Road to Character.

0:47:02.780 --> 0:47:08.000
<v S1>My favorite one is the Second Mountain. Absolutely unbelievable book. Unbelievable.

0:47:08.000 --> 0:47:10.129
<v S1>And I love his stuff. The New York Times, he's

0:47:10.130 --> 0:47:14.540
<v S1>like a centrist kind of conservative, but like, yeah, logical.

0:47:14.540 --> 0:47:16.700
<v S1>I like him. Okay. This one turned out to be

0:47:16.700 --> 0:47:19.790
<v S1>not great. A couple people. I looked at it again,

0:47:19.790 --> 0:47:22.700
<v S1>people don't like me linking to Substack. I'm going to

0:47:22.700 --> 0:47:25.759
<v S1>link to Substack. The question isn't is it Substack or

0:47:25.760 --> 0:47:29.360
<v S1>is it whatever, New York Times, because all these different

0:47:29.360 --> 0:47:32.210
<v S1>sources can be bad. What I care about is like

0:47:32.210 --> 0:47:36.050
<v S1>factually being wrong or like making claims and not backing

0:47:36.050 --> 0:47:38.810
<v S1>them up in some sort of in any sort of way,

0:47:38.810 --> 0:47:42.980
<v S1>or just being ideologue and just like being hateful or

0:47:42.980 --> 0:47:46.100
<v S1>rambling or whatever, like, well, I'm rambling, so not quite

0:47:46.100 --> 0:47:49.130
<v S1>the same. But the point is, the best people in

0:47:49.130 --> 0:47:53.060
<v S1>the world at thinking and being rigorous and having good

0:47:53.060 --> 0:47:57.950
<v S1>ideas are going to Substack, okay, and beehive and all

0:47:57.950 --> 0:48:02.150
<v S1>these other platforms and YouTube and TikTok. Even so, it's

0:48:02.150 --> 0:48:04.640
<v S1>not the source that I'm linking to. That's the problem.

0:48:04.640 --> 0:48:07.820
<v S1>The quality of the content is the problem because before

0:48:07.820 --> 0:48:11.300
<v S1>too long, CNBC and like Fox, first of all, Fox News,

0:48:11.300 --> 0:48:13.520
<v S1>I don't link to that usually. I'm sure they have

0:48:13.520 --> 0:48:16.610
<v S1>good news sometimes, but you get the point. It's not

0:48:16.610 --> 0:48:20.719
<v S1>about the type of source, okay? Blogs are just as

0:48:20.719 --> 0:48:25.549
<v S1>authoritative as YouTube as a lot of the media networks

0:48:25.550 --> 0:48:28.040
<v S1>at this point. It's more about the individual and the

0:48:28.040 --> 0:48:31.910
<v S1>actual article. I am making these links available so that

0:48:31.910 --> 0:48:34.910
<v S1>someone can my link numbers or my click numbers are

0:48:34.910 --> 0:48:38.750
<v S1>probably going to go down because they will be like, well,

0:48:38.750 --> 0:48:40.850
<v S1>I don't want to read from this guy, or I

0:48:40.850 --> 0:48:43.250
<v S1>don't want to read from Hacker News or Financial Times.

0:48:43.250 --> 0:48:45.950
<v S1>I hate that place or whatever. Hopefully you don't need

0:48:45.950 --> 0:48:48.620
<v S1>it anyway. Hopefully this one sentence is good enough. That's

0:48:48.620 --> 0:48:50.540
<v S1>the whole point of doing the summary. All right. New

0:48:50.540 --> 0:48:54.080
<v S1>York Times deep dive into devastation of Ukraine. Oh, this

0:48:54.080 --> 0:48:58.009
<v S1>story was absolutely nuts. And yeah, New York Times good stuff.

0:48:58.010 --> 0:49:00.740
<v S1>They're staying around at a company more than two years

0:49:00.739 --> 0:49:05.300
<v S1>could massively hurt your earning potential. US job openings hit

0:49:05.330 --> 0:49:10.070
<v S1>a three year low. Layoffs are surprisingly low, it says CNN.

0:49:10.070 --> 0:49:14.540
<v S1>See above for commentary on sources. Viagra improves blood flow

0:49:14.540 --> 0:49:19.520
<v S1>and could help to prevent dementia. University of Oxford 49%

0:49:19.520 --> 0:49:23.180
<v S1>of independents think Trump should drop out because of his

0:49:23.180 --> 0:49:26.480
<v S1>guilty verdict. I'm making a prediction. I think this effect

0:49:26.480 --> 0:49:29.180
<v S1>wears off and Trump will be pulling even with Biden

0:49:29.180 --> 0:49:31.040
<v S1>within a month. You know what I'm going to do?

0:49:31.040 --> 0:49:36.910
<v S1>Let's go look at 538 538 polls. Wow. Look at

0:49:36.910 --> 0:49:41.529
<v S1>the impact. Look at the impact of the guilty verdict. Yeah,

0:49:41.530 --> 0:49:45.640
<v S1>it happened right in here somewhere. Oh, look. No impact.

0:49:45.640 --> 0:49:48.549
<v S1>And maybe I'm reading this wrong. Maybe this doesn't account

0:49:48.550 --> 0:49:52.460
<v S1>for independence. I mean, this is this is a June

0:49:52.460 --> 0:49:57.489
<v S1>12th 10th through 12th result. Echelon insights. I don't know

0:49:57.489 --> 0:50:01.839
<v S1>how big this thing is. Okay, YouGov I know that's respectable.

0:50:01.840 --> 0:50:06.670
<v S1>Biden 40, Trump 42. Okay. We got two different echelon

0:50:06.670 --> 0:50:10.930
<v S1>ones daily cause what do we got? 4545 tide. So

0:50:10.930 --> 0:50:15.250
<v S1>so I read this article and it's like, yeah, 49%

0:50:15.250 --> 0:50:18.310
<v S1>of independents think Trump should drop out after his guilty verdict.

0:50:18.310 --> 0:50:22.480
<v S1>Are these polls okay? That's one argument. Independents don't respond

0:50:22.480 --> 0:50:25.569
<v S1>to polls. And supposedly these independents are going to switch

0:50:25.570 --> 0:50:28.060
<v S1>the thing and they're going to be mad at Trump,

0:50:28.060 --> 0:50:30.730
<v S1>and it's going to go for Biden. I don't buy it.

0:50:30.940 --> 0:50:33.700
<v S1>If anything, in my opinion, this is just my opinion.

0:50:33.700 --> 0:50:37.600
<v S1>This is politics. Like, who knows anything, right? In my opinion,

0:50:37.600 --> 0:50:41.500
<v S1>these numbers are soft for Trump. I think Trump is

0:50:41.500 --> 0:50:44.380
<v S1>probably winning by another 5 or 10 points right now.

0:50:44.380 --> 0:50:48.730
<v S1>That's my guess. And I don't think him being convicted

0:50:48.730 --> 0:50:53.650
<v S1>is going to do anything for his numbers if if not,

0:50:53.650 --> 0:50:56.920
<v S1>make it better for him. Just ridiculous. This is why

0:50:56.920 --> 0:50:59.170
<v S1>I think about I. I literally do not look at

0:50:59.170 --> 0:51:03.520
<v S1>news anymore other other than like I brings me political

0:51:03.520 --> 0:51:06.009
<v S1>news and analyses for me and then I have to

0:51:06.010 --> 0:51:08.200
<v S1>go like read the story, I have to do my

0:51:08.200 --> 0:51:10.990
<v S1>analysis or whatever. But like I do not pay attention

0:51:10.989 --> 0:51:13.629
<v S1>to this stuff. I'm trying to build human 3.0 I

0:51:13.630 --> 0:51:17.080
<v S1>don't like. I'm just so disillusioned with everything. I'm just

0:51:17.080 --> 0:51:20.380
<v S1>like checked out. All right, X is doing adult content.

0:51:20.380 --> 0:51:24.009
<v S1>Good for them. Ernest Hemingway wrote a deeply moving letter

0:51:24.010 --> 0:51:27.460
<v S1>to friends who lost their son, saying, those who truly

0:51:27.460 --> 0:51:34.750
<v S1>live never really die. I love Maria Popova. The marginalien. Yeah,

0:51:34.750 --> 0:51:36.640
<v S1>I liked the old name that she had for that

0:51:36.640 --> 0:51:40.390
<v S1>site before. I can't remember what it was. The yellow site. Anyway,

0:51:40.390 --> 0:51:42.880
<v S1>one of the coolest life wisdom reads I've come across

0:51:42.880 --> 0:51:44.680
<v S1>in a while. This is a really cool one. I'll

0:51:44.680 --> 0:51:47.319
<v S1>put this one up. You can never expect honesty from

0:51:47.320 --> 0:51:50.230
<v S1>people who even lie to themselves. You'll be ten times

0:51:50.230 --> 0:51:52.600
<v S1>happier if you forgive your parents and stop blaming them

0:51:52.600 --> 0:51:56.230
<v S1>for your misery for yourself. From society's advice, most of

0:51:56.230 --> 0:51:58.510
<v S1>them have no idea of what they're doing. If you

0:51:58.510 --> 0:52:01.660
<v S1>continue to wait for the right time, you'll waste your

0:52:01.660 --> 0:52:04.540
<v S1>entire life and nothing will ever happen. It's a massive

0:52:04.540 --> 0:52:07.870
<v S1>list of these. They're quite, quite good. You'll lose 99%

0:52:07.870 --> 0:52:10.779
<v S1>of your close friends when you start to improve your life.

0:52:10.780 --> 0:52:14.020
<v S1>That's bleak. I wouldn't go with 99%, but I get

0:52:14.020 --> 0:52:17.920
<v S1>the point. You don't need 100 self-help books. All you

0:52:17.920 --> 0:52:21.280
<v S1>need is action and self-discipline. It's a great list. It's

0:52:21.280 --> 0:52:23.710
<v S1>a great list. You should check it out. Ideas and

0:52:23.710 --> 0:52:27.940
<v S1>analysis I think I figured out the simplest possible answer

0:52:27.940 --> 0:52:31.660
<v S1>for why Trump is still doing so well. Oh my god,

0:52:31.660 --> 0:52:35.230
<v S1>I didn't include the link. Oh man, I didn't include

0:52:35.230 --> 0:52:38.169
<v S1>the link in here. It's like, oh really? You did great.

0:52:38.170 --> 0:52:40.870
<v S1>Thanks for not sharing it. And recommendation for the week

0:52:40.870 --> 0:52:44.650
<v S1>is Tyler Cowen and Aakash Patel. As I talked about

0:52:44.650 --> 0:52:47.109
<v S1>in the aphorism of the week, live as if you

0:52:47.110 --> 0:52:49.810
<v S1>were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to

0:52:49.810 --> 0:52:52.960
<v S1>live forever. Live as if you were to die tomorrow.

0:52:52.960 --> 0:52:56.589
<v S1>Learn as if you were to live forever. Mahatma Gandhi.

0:52:57.719 --> 0:53:00.839
<v S1>Unsupervised Learning is produced and edited by Daniel Meisler on

0:53:00.840 --> 0:53:05.460
<v S1>a Neumann U87 AI microphone using Hindenburg. Intro and outro

0:53:05.460 --> 0:53:08.790
<v S1>music is by zombie with the why and to get

0:53:08.790 --> 0:53:10.859
<v S1>the text and links from this episode, sign up for

0:53:10.860 --> 0:53:16.509
<v S1>the newsletter version of the show at Daniel meisler.com/newsletter. We'll

0:53:16.510 --> 0:53:17.350
<v S1>see you next time.