1 00:00:00,110 --> 00:00:02,240 S1: What do you call an endpoint security product that works 2 00:00:02,240 --> 00:00:05,600 S1: perfectly but makes users miserable a failure? The old approach 3 00:00:05,600 --> 00:00:08,420 S1: to endpoint security is to lock down employee devices and 4 00:00:08,420 --> 00:00:11,870 S1: roll out changes through forced restarts, but it just doesn't work. 5 00:00:11,900 --> 00:00:14,720 S1: It is miserable because they've got a mountain of support tickets. 6 00:00:14,720 --> 00:00:17,570 S1: Employees start using personal devices just to get their work done, 7 00:00:17,570 --> 00:00:19,880 S1: and executives opt out the first time it makes them 8 00:00:19,880 --> 00:00:22,190 S1: late for a meeting. You can have a successful security 9 00:00:22,190 --> 00:00:24,920 S1: implementation unless you work with end users, and that's where 10 00:00:24,920 --> 00:00:28,100 S1: Kaleid comes in. Their user first device trust solution notifies 11 00:00:28,100 --> 00:00:30,590 S1: users as soon as it detects an issue on their device, 12 00:00:30,590 --> 00:00:32,720 S1: and teaches them how to solve it without needing help 13 00:00:32,720 --> 00:00:35,930 S1: from it. That way, untrusted devices are blocked from authenticating, 14 00:00:35,930 --> 00:00:38,810 S1: but users don't stay blocked. Kaleidos is designed for companies 15 00:00:38,810 --> 00:00:42,080 S1: with Okta, and it works on macOS, windows, Linux, and 16 00:00:42,080 --> 00:00:44,240 S1: mobile devices. So if you have Okta and you're looking 17 00:00:44,240 --> 00:00:47,690 S1: for a device trust solution that respects your team, visit collider.com. 18 00:00:47,960 --> 00:00:50,600 S1: Unsupervised learning to watch a demo and see how it works. 19 00:00:50,600 --> 00:00:58,280 S1: That's collider.com unsupervised learning. Welcome to Unsupervised Learning, a security, AI, 20 00:00:58,280 --> 00:01:00,830 S1: and meaning focused podcast that looks at how best to 21 00:01:00,830 --> 00:01:04,459 S1: thrive as humans in a post AI world. It combines 22 00:01:04,459 --> 00:01:08,300 S1: original ideas, analysis, and mental models to bring not just 23 00:01:08,300 --> 00:01:11,209 S1: the news, but why it matters and how to respond. 24 00:01:15,540 --> 00:01:18,330 S1: All right. Welcome to unsupervised learning. This is Daniel Meisler. 25 00:01:18,360 --> 00:01:24,119 S1: All right. 436. In about a bunch of AI stuff here. So, uh, 26 00:01:24,569 --> 00:01:27,780 S1: big religious day for me on Monday. It was, uh, 27 00:01:27,780 --> 00:01:31,800 S1: WWDC by Apple. And what I said after it was Apple, 28 00:01:31,800 --> 00:01:35,190 S1: just one. I they caught up and passed everyone basically 29 00:01:35,190 --> 00:01:38,190 S1: in one shot. And I think this is because the 30 00:01:38,190 --> 00:01:40,229 S1: thing that they get that most people don't is it 31 00:01:40,230 --> 00:01:42,690 S1: it's all about the platform. It's all about the integrations. 32 00:01:42,690 --> 00:01:45,809 S1: It's all about the ecosystem. And they're essentially the only 33 00:01:45,810 --> 00:01:49,200 S1: one who understands that and is also good at tech. 34 00:01:49,200 --> 00:01:52,380 S1: And they also have this massive platform in the iPhone. Right. 35 00:01:52,380 --> 00:01:55,260 S1: So it's just they're just winning. They're so far ahead 36 00:01:55,260 --> 00:01:57,960 S1: of everyone in terms of long term thinking. Like it's 37 00:01:57,960 --> 00:02:00,660 S1: not even close now. This one has since been cleared up, 38 00:02:00,660 --> 00:02:02,820 S1: but at the time it wasn't clear what part of 39 00:02:02,820 --> 00:02:06,870 S1: what they were doing was actually Apple stuff. And what 40 00:02:06,870 --> 00:02:09,420 S1: part was OpenAI. I feel like they could have done 41 00:02:09,419 --> 00:02:11,820 S1: a better job explaining that because I was paying attention, 42 00:02:11,820 --> 00:02:14,940 S1: and I still kind of didn't get it. Looking back, 43 00:02:14,940 --> 00:02:18,030 S1: it was pretty clear somehow I missed it. And I, 44 00:02:18,030 --> 00:02:20,190 S1: I mean, I used to work there, I've worked on 45 00:02:20,190 --> 00:02:23,460 S1: AI quite a bit and I like, I love AI 46 00:02:23,460 --> 00:02:25,620 S1: and I love Apple, and I still didn't get it. 47 00:02:25,620 --> 00:02:27,510 S1: So I feel like they could have been more clear. 48 00:02:27,510 --> 00:02:30,120 S1: So the answer to this question is that most of 49 00:02:30,120 --> 00:02:33,060 S1: what they showed was actually all Apple stuff. It was 50 00:02:33,060 --> 00:02:37,440 S1: not pure OpenAI. And that that's a huge difference, right? 51 00:02:37,440 --> 00:02:40,980 S1: So so essentially what the situation is, is, I would 52 00:02:40,980 --> 00:02:43,980 S1: say probably 90% of what they showed. I don't know, 53 00:02:43,980 --> 00:02:46,170 S1: you can figure it out for yourself. Like if you 54 00:02:46,169 --> 00:02:48,510 S1: did the the math or whatever, it doesn't really matter. 55 00:02:48,510 --> 00:02:51,840 S1: The point is like 90% roughly of everything they talked 56 00:02:51,840 --> 00:02:56,610 S1: about on device, the cloud stuff, the whole new cloud infrastructure, 57 00:02:56,610 --> 00:03:00,870 S1: which is absolutely insane. They basically built a new AI 58 00:03:00,900 --> 00:03:05,250 S1: cloud infrastructure that's completely secure, where, you know, they don't 59 00:03:05,250 --> 00:03:08,160 S1: even have access to the content that's on there. They 60 00:03:08,160 --> 00:03:11,220 S1: don't give that access to any third parties. It's essentially 61 00:03:11,220 --> 00:03:15,270 S1: like a cloud version of the local, very secure enclave. 62 00:03:15,270 --> 00:03:17,580 S1: I'm not sure it's quite that level, but it's pretty 63 00:03:17,580 --> 00:03:20,670 S1: much that level. It is better than anything that exists 64 00:03:20,669 --> 00:03:23,280 S1: in the industry right now in terms of like secure 65 00:03:23,280 --> 00:03:27,180 S1: cloud compute, and it's just extraordinary. And they generated it 66 00:03:27,180 --> 00:03:30,239 S1: just so that they could do these AI features. So 67 00:03:30,240 --> 00:03:33,840 S1: that is essentially their AI story is they're going to 68 00:03:33,840 --> 00:03:37,140 S1: have deep context about you because they're Apple. And this 69 00:03:37,140 --> 00:03:40,050 S1: is essentially life OS is what we're talking about. And 70 00:03:40,050 --> 00:03:43,620 S1: so they have all that information about you and they 71 00:03:43,620 --> 00:03:46,290 S1: have the ability to bring that to AI. And what 72 00:03:46,290 --> 00:03:48,090 S1: they've done is they've made it so that if you 73 00:03:48,090 --> 00:03:50,610 S1: could do it locally, it does it locally, and if 74 00:03:50,610 --> 00:03:52,470 S1: you can't do it locally, it goes up to the 75 00:03:52,470 --> 00:03:56,820 S1: cloud using AI models by Apple. So these are Apple 76 00:03:56,820 --> 00:04:00,660 S1: models running on Apple silicon right. It's not even it's 77 00:04:00,660 --> 00:04:04,140 S1: not even Nvidia stuff. They're using their own chips also 78 00:04:04,140 --> 00:04:07,350 S1: in the cloud and obviously on device. So that's the 79 00:04:07,350 --> 00:04:12,480 S1: whole ecosystem. Now that is for all the context data okay. 80 00:04:12,480 --> 00:04:16,590 S1: That's for basically all of the personal data that you have, 81 00:04:16,589 --> 00:04:18,810 S1: which they don't want to share with other people and 82 00:04:18,810 --> 00:04:21,210 S1: they want to be very, very private. Now in the 83 00:04:21,210 --> 00:04:23,880 S1: case of like looking things up like, oh, get the 84 00:04:23,880 --> 00:04:27,270 S1: current weather and stuff like that. That's where they partnered 85 00:04:27,270 --> 00:04:31,919 S1: with the new Siri, with the new with OpenAI. Right. 86 00:04:31,920 --> 00:04:34,529 S1: So that's that's what they did. So essentially what they 87 00:04:34,529 --> 00:04:38,820 S1: did was they said, okay for live searches, OpenAI is 88 00:04:38,820 --> 00:04:42,120 S1: really good at that. You know, fact checking, stuff like that. 89 00:04:42,120 --> 00:04:44,700 S1: Just just calling the internet. And maybe they're not great 90 00:04:44,700 --> 00:04:46,620 S1: at fact checking, but you know what I mean? So 91 00:04:46,620 --> 00:04:51,420 S1: they're leveraging third party AI for a very specific thing, 92 00:04:51,420 --> 00:04:54,539 S1: but they're not like uploading all this stuff to OpenAI. 93 00:04:54,540 --> 00:04:57,599 S1: It's like the exact opposite of what they're doing. They 94 00:04:57,600 --> 00:05:00,570 S1: built this whole new infrastructure just to keep it all 95 00:05:00,570 --> 00:05:03,299 S1: very secure and very private. So it's very much two 96 00:05:03,300 --> 00:05:06,030 S1: different things. Apple AI, which is like 90% of what 97 00:05:06,029 --> 00:05:08,580 S1: they talked about, which has the on prem and the 98 00:05:08,580 --> 00:05:12,060 S1: cloud component. And then this other third party integration, which 99 00:05:12,060 --> 00:05:14,640 S1: is with ChatGPT. And they even talked about yeah, they're 100 00:05:14,640 --> 00:05:17,670 S1: going to do like they're looking at possibly doing Gemini. 101 00:05:17,670 --> 00:05:20,609 S1: But the point is other third party services for those 102 00:05:20,610 --> 00:05:24,539 S1: kind of integrations. But don't confuse it. That is not 103 00:05:24,570 --> 00:05:28,920 S1: what they're doing with our personal data. Like so Live Bovary. 104 00:05:29,070 --> 00:05:31,290 S1: A whole bunch of people were like, well, how do 105 00:05:31,290 --> 00:05:34,409 S1: I find an android? Like, I can't believe they're sending 106 00:05:34,410 --> 00:05:36,510 S1: all my data to OpenAI. And it's like, that is 107 00:05:36,510 --> 00:05:38,729 S1: not what they said. It's not what they said. It's 108 00:05:38,730 --> 00:05:42,270 S1: like the opposite of what they said. So, um, already 109 00:05:42,270 --> 00:05:46,950 S1: running the demos or the betas for iOS 18, uh, 110 00:05:46,950 --> 00:05:50,490 S1: remarkably stable, but largely because they didn't really change that 111 00:05:50,490 --> 00:05:54,060 S1: much yet, and they definitely haven't added like the AI 112 00:05:54,089 --> 00:05:57,600 S1: services yet. So like, Siri is still the same. That 113 00:05:57,600 --> 00:06:00,570 S1: stuff is coming out like later this year, they said. 114 00:06:00,570 --> 00:06:03,029 S1: So I feel like I didn't really get the AI 115 00:06:03,029 --> 00:06:06,300 S1: features that I was looking for immediately in the beta, 116 00:06:06,300 --> 00:06:09,480 S1: which I was hoping to get. But whatever it happens 117 00:06:09,480 --> 00:06:13,560 S1: when it happens went and trained kickboxing, I was. Bad 118 00:06:13,560 --> 00:06:16,800 S1: at it. It was quite sad. I was like five 119 00:06:16,800 --> 00:06:19,950 S1: times worse than a beginner, I think, because it's hard 120 00:06:19,950 --> 00:06:23,070 S1: for me to like, do things slowly and I'm like 121 00:06:23,070 --> 00:06:25,529 S1: imagining things in my brain, but my body won't do 122 00:06:25,529 --> 00:06:28,350 S1: that thing that's in my brain. I'm just very sort 123 00:06:28,350 --> 00:06:30,810 S1: of confused. So I think I'm going to do some more, 124 00:06:30,810 --> 00:06:34,380 S1: like learning the basics of the body coordination, like on 125 00:06:34,380 --> 00:06:37,890 S1: a bag, and then do it with live people after that. 126 00:06:37,890 --> 00:06:41,039 S1: That's my current plan. Plus I'm going to be doing 127 00:06:41,040 --> 00:06:43,320 S1: a Gits as well. And uh, one of the most 128 00:06:43,320 --> 00:06:47,010 S1: important conversations ever on AI safety. Absolutely. Got to watch 129 00:06:47,010 --> 00:06:51,960 S1: this thing. It's, uh, Leopold Aschenbrenner and Dwarkesh Patel. I've 130 00:06:51,960 --> 00:06:54,630 S1: talked about this a million times, but it is really, 131 00:06:54,630 --> 00:06:58,890 S1: really good. Wrote a new fabric pattern called Capture Thinkers Work. 132 00:06:58,890 --> 00:07:03,150 S1: So you basically send in, like Hayek or somebody into, 133 00:07:03,150 --> 00:07:07,170 S1: you know, fabric SP capture thinkers work. And I mean, 134 00:07:07,170 --> 00:07:10,800 S1: it's extraordinary. In fact, I can show you, okay, so 135 00:07:10,800 --> 00:07:15,180 S1: if we do a capture thinkers work here, let's do this. 136 00:07:15,180 --> 00:07:18,030 S1: Let's first let's blow it up some and then we'll 137 00:07:18,030 --> 00:07:22,740 S1: do who's a philosopher? Hume. We'll send that to capture 138 00:07:22,740 --> 00:07:26,310 S1: thinkers work. So comes up with a single line sentence 139 00:07:26,310 --> 00:07:30,900 S1: up here. Most impactful ideas primary advice or teachings. The 140 00:07:30,900 --> 00:07:33,960 S1: works their main works. So you can go build a 141 00:07:33,960 --> 00:07:37,830 S1: reading list based on this top quotes. Something is human 142 00:07:37,830 --> 00:07:41,460 S1: if it emphasizes the role of experienced custom and sentiment 143 00:07:41,460 --> 00:07:45,540 S1: over abstract reason and innate ideas, and like advice of 144 00:07:45,540 --> 00:07:50,760 S1: how to like implement human concepts into your life. So yeah, 145 00:07:50,760 --> 00:07:53,100 S1: love this pattern. It's a great way of like thinking 146 00:07:53,100 --> 00:07:56,430 S1: about someone's work. So for example, if you do like 147 00:07:56,460 --> 00:07:58,800 S1: S or Perl, which it doesn't matter if you spell 148 00:07:58,800 --> 00:08:01,290 S1: it wrong, for example, it looks like maybe I spelled 149 00:08:01,290 --> 00:08:03,930 S1: it wrong because it corrected it to one R and 150 00:08:03,930 --> 00:08:07,290 S1: one L, but yeah. Background where they were born, the 151 00:08:07,290 --> 00:08:11,580 S1: school psychotherapy just really, really powerful. Got a thread here 152 00:08:11,580 --> 00:08:14,280 S1: on how to fight a good mentor. I, I put 153 00:08:14,280 --> 00:08:16,230 S1: this out a very long time ago, but I think 154 00:08:16,230 --> 00:08:18,239 S1: it's worth sharing. I'm going to go ahead and open 155 00:08:18,240 --> 00:08:22,260 S1: it up. So it's like yeah, being mentored by someone 156 00:08:22,260 --> 00:08:25,560 S1: ahead of you can really change your life. Don't overuse flattery. 157 00:08:25,560 --> 00:08:30,600 S1: Ask something very specific. Behave like a future peer like don't. 158 00:08:30,690 --> 00:08:34,980 S1: Don't grovel. Basically, show your you've already done a bunch 159 00:08:34,980 --> 00:08:38,040 S1: of work and, you know, don't ask basic questions that 160 00:08:38,040 --> 00:08:41,370 S1: you could have got by reading their blog or their book. 161 00:08:41,370 --> 00:08:43,709 S1: I mean, to some extent you can, but you don't 162 00:08:43,710 --> 00:08:46,380 S1: want to overdo that and ask for an opinion on 163 00:08:46,380 --> 00:08:48,900 S1: something you've created. So it's like, look, I've done work, 164 00:08:48,900 --> 00:08:52,979 S1: I've created something. I'm curious about a very specific question 165 00:08:52,980 --> 00:08:55,320 S1: about what you think about this thing you don't want 166 00:08:55,320 --> 00:08:58,469 S1: to ask open ended things. Kind of a general rule 167 00:08:58,470 --> 00:09:01,980 S1: here is like, don't give them work. You're you're being 168 00:09:01,980 --> 00:09:05,760 S1: respectful of their time by asking a pretty small thing 169 00:09:05,760 --> 00:09:08,640 S1: and sort of like presenting yourself as a peer and 170 00:09:08,640 --> 00:09:10,770 S1: you're like, hey, look, I'm looking for feedback on this. 171 00:09:10,770 --> 00:09:12,630 S1: I know you've done it a lot, and that's kind 172 00:09:12,630 --> 00:09:15,030 S1: of the vibe. Or you can offer an improvement or 173 00:09:15,030 --> 00:09:19,800 S1: construction a constructive like comment or feedback on something they've 174 00:09:19,800 --> 00:09:23,400 S1: done and most importantly, like produce something really cool and 175 00:09:23,400 --> 00:09:26,189 S1: show it to them. And then they're likely to just like, 176 00:09:26,190 --> 00:09:29,040 S1: treat you like a future peer and interact with you. 177 00:09:29,040 --> 00:09:31,829 S1: And that's the summary here. So and it got a 178 00:09:31,830 --> 00:09:35,670 S1: blog post around it okay. Let's see. Yeah. Adding source 179 00:09:35,670 --> 00:09:38,460 S1: names to stories now which we'll see here in a second. 180 00:09:38,460 --> 00:09:41,190 S1: So basically you'll know what the source is before you 181 00:09:41,220 --> 00:09:44,820 S1: click it. New member piece on the future of AI okay. 182 00:09:44,820 --> 00:09:46,980 S1: Yeah I'm going to go into this one. This one's 183 00:09:46,980 --> 00:09:51,690 S1: pretty major okay. Let's dive into this. All right. So 184 00:09:51,690 --> 00:09:57,210 S1: first thing is like my definition of AGI and ASI. 185 00:09:57,240 --> 00:10:02,640 S1: So my definition of AGI is can functionally replace an 186 00:10:02,640 --> 00:10:05,970 S1: average white collar worker in the US making 80 K 187 00:10:05,970 --> 00:10:09,540 S1: in 2023. And I say 2023 because it's going to 188 00:10:09,540 --> 00:10:12,570 S1: get weird. This definition will get more weird if you 189 00:10:12,570 --> 00:10:15,719 S1: don't lock it into a previous time before. Like AGI. 190 00:10:15,750 --> 00:10:19,500 S1: We're basically saying like, look, a white collar worker making 191 00:10:19,500 --> 00:10:22,469 S1: an average salary, right? Like 80 K in the US 192 00:10:22,470 --> 00:10:28,470 S1: in 2023. And ASI, I'm defining as an AGI that's 193 00:10:28,470 --> 00:10:32,040 S1: smarter and more capable than any human that's ever lived. 194 00:10:32,040 --> 00:10:34,980 S1: And what what this is essentially saying is like, if 195 00:10:34,980 --> 00:10:37,560 S1: you can functionally replace an average white collar worker in 196 00:10:37,559 --> 00:10:42,780 S1: the US, what that is referring to is generality, because 197 00:10:42,780 --> 00:10:45,150 S1: what I'm talking about is the ability for the boss 198 00:10:45,179 --> 00:10:47,610 S1: to say, you know what, you're actually not on that 199 00:10:47,610 --> 00:10:51,690 S1: project anymore. Go get with Julie and Lisa, and you're 200 00:10:51,690 --> 00:10:55,110 S1: being completely retasked to this other project, which is kind 201 00:10:55,110 --> 00:10:57,840 S1: of unrelated to that. And there is some issue of 202 00:10:57,840 --> 00:11:01,860 S1: like specialization, but we're assuming it's still within the specialization 203 00:11:01,860 --> 00:11:05,189 S1: of that person, and it's general enough where you could 204 00:11:05,190 --> 00:11:08,250 S1: be like, look, it's a completely different task. It's a 205 00:11:08,250 --> 00:11:10,860 S1: completely different project. It's got a different time frame, it's 206 00:11:10,860 --> 00:11:14,250 S1: got different goals, it's got different metrics. And what a 207 00:11:14,250 --> 00:11:17,640 S1: human does is basically say, okay, cool, I will erase 208 00:11:17,640 --> 00:11:20,970 S1: what I was thinking before. I will take the new requirements, 209 00:11:20,970 --> 00:11:22,560 S1: I will come up with a new plan and I 210 00:11:22,559 --> 00:11:24,270 S1: will start working on it, which means you got to 211 00:11:24,270 --> 00:11:26,610 S1: break it into tasks. You got to have a timeline, 212 00:11:26,640 --> 00:11:28,110 S1: you got to have a schedule, you got to have 213 00:11:28,110 --> 00:11:30,720 S1: all that. So in other words, it's not just narrowly 214 00:11:30,720 --> 00:11:35,310 S1: executing small tasks, it's also the planning stage. It's also 215 00:11:35,309 --> 00:11:39,030 S1: constant readjustment, constant evolution of like how do I best 216 00:11:39,030 --> 00:11:41,880 S1: do this. And obviously there's different tiers of quality of 217 00:11:41,880 --> 00:11:44,760 S1: people who can do that as well. But that's why 218 00:11:44,760 --> 00:11:49,410 S1: I say average white collar worker making $80,000. So it's 219 00:11:49,410 --> 00:11:53,400 S1: not like exceptional. And it's not like the worst. So 220 00:11:53,400 --> 00:11:57,000 S1: so given that as a definition of AGI, this general 221 00:11:57,000 --> 00:12:01,020 S1: intelligence that can like be retasked as well as do 222 00:12:01,020 --> 00:12:05,130 S1: specific tasks underneath plus answer emails plus be, you know, 223 00:12:05,130 --> 00:12:09,059 S1: communicative and, you know, basically function as a good employee. 224 00:12:09,059 --> 00:12:13,860 S1: That's essentially AGI. So given that what who is able 225 00:12:13,860 --> 00:12:16,319 S1: to do that and basically be a thinker and be 226 00:12:16,320 --> 00:12:20,429 S1: a producer of new ideas, basically smarter and more capable 227 00:12:20,429 --> 00:12:22,800 S1: than any human that's ever lived. And a good way 228 00:12:22,800 --> 00:12:26,400 S1: of thinking about this is like and Aschenbrenner talked about 229 00:12:26,400 --> 00:12:29,850 S1: this as well in the Türkische caste. So while using 230 00:12:29,850 --> 00:12:33,150 S1: their first names, Leopold talked about that in the Dwarkesh 231 00:12:33,150 --> 00:12:37,170 S1: podcast conversation. It's essentially like, what if you could just 232 00:12:37,170 --> 00:12:42,570 S1: make like 10,000 Einsteins or John von Neumann, right? That 233 00:12:42,570 --> 00:12:45,810 S1: would be insane. So just imagine John von Neumann here, 234 00:12:45,809 --> 00:12:48,989 S1: or Einstein or whoever you want to put as like 235 00:12:48,990 --> 00:12:51,630 S1: the smartest person. And just imagine you can have a 236 00:12:51,630 --> 00:12:54,390 S1: whole bunch of them who could go and do these tasks, 237 00:12:54,390 --> 00:12:58,110 S1: like AGI tasks like, you know, most importantly, come up 238 00:12:58,110 --> 00:13:00,720 S1: with new science, come up with new innovations, come up 239 00:13:00,720 --> 00:13:04,050 S1: with new medicines, but also, yeah, go do all this work, 240 00:13:04,050 --> 00:13:06,870 S1: figure out how how to do it better figure out 241 00:13:06,870 --> 00:13:08,429 S1: better ways to do all the work we have to 242 00:13:08,429 --> 00:13:10,830 S1: do and then go do it. So that's ASI. And 243 00:13:10,830 --> 00:13:14,339 S1: I'm saying essentially there's a big divide here between conscious 244 00:13:14,340 --> 00:13:17,580 S1: and unconscious. And it actually doesn't matter all that much. 245 00:13:17,610 --> 00:13:20,580 S1: A lot of people think that consciousness is on this 246 00:13:20,580 --> 00:13:22,890 S1: path over here. So it's like, oh, we're going to 247 00:13:22,890 --> 00:13:26,310 S1: get artificial narrow intelligence and then we're going to get AGI. 248 00:13:26,309 --> 00:13:28,440 S1: And then after that it becomes conscious and then it 249 00:13:28,440 --> 00:13:31,950 S1: becomes super intelligent or some combination thereof. But I think 250 00:13:31,950 --> 00:13:34,200 S1: the better way to think about this is that we 251 00:13:34,200 --> 00:13:37,200 S1: could stay completely over here and not even get consciousness, 252 00:13:37,200 --> 00:13:41,730 S1: but still have artificial super intelligence, right? So one does 253 00:13:41,730 --> 00:13:45,300 S1: not require the other. And yeah, I've got prediction for 254 00:13:45,630 --> 00:13:50,100 S1: a date later on. We are now inside the post itself. Yeah. 255 00:13:50,100 --> 00:13:52,560 S1: So how I see the paths of development and the 256 00:13:52,559 --> 00:13:54,959 S1: thing that got me talking about this, or thinking about 257 00:13:54,960 --> 00:13:58,350 S1: this a lot more, is just this whole Leopold and 258 00:13:58,350 --> 00:14:02,220 S1: Dwarkesh thing. Yeah. So I talked about that path and 259 00:14:02,220 --> 00:14:06,600 S1: that's the conversation. Yeah. Okay. So this is basically my 260 00:14:06,600 --> 00:14:09,420 S1: argument of like how we're going to get to AGI 261 00:14:09,420 --> 00:14:14,429 S1: and ASI. So I think this is a hypothesis right. 262 00:14:14,520 --> 00:14:17,190 S1: It's it's an idea. It's a thought only so many 263 00:14:17,190 --> 00:14:20,640 S1: components to understand the world. Some of these are easily 264 00:14:20,640 --> 00:14:23,850 S1: attainable and some are like impossible. So an impossible one 265 00:14:23,850 --> 00:14:26,790 S1: is like you can't calculate all the combinations of things 266 00:14:26,790 --> 00:14:31,770 S1: like numbers get crazy very quickly with combinations. So unless 267 00:14:31,770 --> 00:14:35,280 S1: you can brute force everything like like God or something, 268 00:14:35,280 --> 00:14:39,060 S1: it's really hard. But I think there are really realistic 269 00:14:39,060 --> 00:14:44,489 S1: and approachable abstractions of that complexity. So my intuition is 270 00:14:44,490 --> 00:14:47,430 S1: that there are likely abstractions of those that we haven't 271 00:14:47,430 --> 00:14:51,090 S1: yet attained. I think that's pretty obvious. And then an 272 00:14:51,090 --> 00:14:54,750 S1: analogy I use here is like fluid dynamics representing all 273 00:14:54,750 --> 00:14:58,680 S1: the molecules in a liquid, or Newtonian physics being an 274 00:14:58,680 --> 00:15:01,680 S1: abstraction for like quantum or whatever the bottom layer is. 275 00:15:01,680 --> 00:15:05,100 S1: So my friend's argument is I was walking with him 276 00:15:05,100 --> 00:15:08,190 S1: recently and like, I think it's really smart. He basically 277 00:15:08,190 --> 00:15:11,310 S1: said there's limitations to what we can do, even with 278 00:15:11,310 --> 00:15:14,700 S1: super intelligence, because of the one way nature of calculation. 279 00:15:14,700 --> 00:15:18,060 S1: So basically P and P, you could try lots of things, 280 00:15:18,060 --> 00:15:20,130 S1: but it's a one way function. You can see if 281 00:15:20,130 --> 00:15:23,430 S1: it works, but you can't like immediately see all the options. 282 00:15:23,430 --> 00:15:26,640 S1: And that's kind of like P and P. So he 283 00:15:26,640 --> 00:15:29,190 S1: came up with a great definition of intelligence, which I've 284 00:15:29,190 --> 00:15:32,730 S1: since seen like other people talking about as well, which 285 00:15:32,730 --> 00:15:35,880 S1: is like the ability to quickly reduce a search space 286 00:15:35,880 --> 00:15:39,060 S1: for a problem, like like pruning trees. So there's like 287 00:15:39,060 --> 00:15:42,510 S1: 100 trillion options. What can we do to get that 288 00:15:42,510 --> 00:15:45,990 S1: down to like 10 or 100 or 1000 or whatever 289 00:15:45,990 --> 00:15:49,050 S1: as fast as possible. And the faster you could do that, 290 00:15:49,050 --> 00:15:51,150 S1: the more you could do that, the more intelligent you are. 291 00:15:51,150 --> 00:15:54,330 S1: And actually reminds me a lot of quantum computing for 292 00:15:54,330 --> 00:15:57,120 S1: the first time. I've never seen like an intersection there, 293 00:15:57,120 --> 00:16:00,990 S1: but imagine that you could test multiple options all at once, 294 00:16:00,990 --> 00:16:03,960 S1: which is kind of the whole thing with quantum anyway, 295 00:16:03,960 --> 00:16:07,530 S1: so here are the components I see leading to superintelligence. 296 00:16:07,530 --> 00:16:10,500 S1: One is a super complex model of the world, like 297 00:16:10,500 --> 00:16:14,480 S1: how the cell works, how medicines. Interact with cells, you know, 298 00:16:14,480 --> 00:16:19,400 S1: molecular interaction with different body parts. So it's essentially like 299 00:16:19,400 --> 00:16:23,870 S1: testing drugs, but doing it with models instead of like 300 00:16:23,870 --> 00:16:27,590 S1: having to actually try it in labs and people and mice. 301 00:16:27,590 --> 00:16:31,010 S1: So think of that at like all levels of physics. 302 00:16:31,010 --> 00:16:35,600 S1: So like quantum atomic molecules, cells and bigger and bigger, 303 00:16:35,600 --> 00:16:40,010 S1: eventually you're at like psychology, sociology, whatever. And in some 304 00:16:40,010 --> 00:16:43,700 S1: cases it's just feeding our current understanding as text. But 305 00:16:43,700 --> 00:16:47,060 S1: even better, if you like, have actual recordings of these 306 00:16:47,060 --> 00:16:51,710 S1: things happening, similar to how Tesla taught its new full Self-Driving. 307 00:16:51,710 --> 00:16:55,040 S1: It's just like, yeah, this is here. Here are the 308 00:16:55,040 --> 00:16:58,220 S1: actual interactions. Learn from that. So the use case I 309 00:16:58,220 --> 00:17:02,510 S1: kept using for this was solving human aging. So let's 310 00:17:02,510 --> 00:17:04,939 S1: say it's like the telomeres or whatever the length of 311 00:17:04,940 --> 00:17:07,430 S1: the telomeres. And there's a whole bunch of different possible 312 00:17:07,430 --> 00:17:10,490 S1: mechanisms of how aging could be happening, and therefore how 313 00:17:10,490 --> 00:17:12,320 S1: we might be able to turn it off or reverse 314 00:17:12,320 --> 00:17:15,320 S1: it or whatever. But the most important thing is like 315 00:17:15,320 --> 00:17:18,320 S1: have a deep understanding of how everything works, so you 316 00:17:18,320 --> 00:17:20,690 S1: know where you could actually start to go and look. 317 00:17:20,690 --> 00:17:23,330 S1: So the next big thing for this, in my opinion, 318 00:17:23,330 --> 00:17:27,740 S1: is the patterns that analogies and metaphors. So links between things. 319 00:17:27,740 --> 00:17:30,679 S1: And we're already seeing like models get really good at that. 320 00:17:30,680 --> 00:17:32,719 S1: And I think the next one is the size of 321 00:17:32,720 --> 00:17:36,680 S1: the working memory. Right. So not exactly sure what this means, 322 00:17:36,680 --> 00:17:39,800 S1: but it's like it's it's like your Ram or your 323 00:17:39,800 --> 00:17:43,040 S1: functional memory. It's like, how much of this map can 324 00:17:43,040 --> 00:17:45,439 S1: you fit in your brain at once without having to 325 00:17:45,440 --> 00:17:47,300 S1: slide it over? And parts of the map fall off 326 00:17:47,300 --> 00:17:49,520 S1: the table and you can't see them. So maybe that's 327 00:17:49,520 --> 00:17:52,220 S1: a combination of multiple tiers. So you have like you 328 00:17:52,220 --> 00:17:55,160 S1: have like Ram, then you have like L1, L2 inside 329 00:17:55,160 --> 00:17:57,980 S1: of the CPU, which is really the brain, not really 330 00:17:57,980 --> 00:18:00,709 S1: memory but kind of all the same. Right. And then 331 00:18:00,710 --> 00:18:03,770 S1: you've got disk which is much slower, which has to 332 00:18:03,770 --> 00:18:07,400 S1: go into memory to get loaded up. And when there's 333 00:18:07,400 --> 00:18:10,580 S1: too much on disk and not enough Ram, like I said, 334 00:18:10,580 --> 00:18:13,490 S1: you got to swap. Right. So these are the types 335 00:18:13,490 --> 00:18:16,370 S1: of things that I think the overall size of that 336 00:18:16,369 --> 00:18:21,290 S1: memory that can do the patterns based on the world 337 00:18:21,290 --> 00:18:24,800 S1: model is essentially what gets us there. That's my theory. 338 00:18:24,800 --> 00:18:28,250 S1: And essentially this theory is that with scale inside of 339 00:18:28,250 --> 00:18:32,300 S1: neural networks, those three things just keep getting better and better, 340 00:18:32,300 --> 00:18:35,840 S1: plus some post-processing which we'll talk about, and a whole 341 00:18:35,840 --> 00:18:38,000 S1: bunch of hacks and tricks that are basically just going 342 00:18:38,000 --> 00:18:40,369 S1: to come with the industry, because my friend pointed out 343 00:18:40,369 --> 00:18:44,239 S1: that just the size of the model enough alone is 344 00:18:44,240 --> 00:18:47,270 S1: not going to be enough, and that Post-training is super critical. 345 00:18:47,270 --> 00:18:50,420 S1: And once I got what he was saying, like, we 346 00:18:50,420 --> 00:18:52,790 S1: definitely agree on that now, it was just something that 347 00:18:52,790 --> 00:18:55,520 S1: I wasn't aware of and that got us kind of 348 00:18:55,520 --> 00:18:58,010 S1: in line. So this is my way of capturing this. 349 00:18:58,010 --> 00:19:01,100 S1: So my hypothesis is that there are very few fundamental 350 00:19:01,100 --> 00:19:04,520 S1: components that allow AI to scale up from narrow AI 351 00:19:04,640 --> 00:19:08,720 S1: to AGI to ASI. So it's a world model, sufficient 352 00:19:08,720 --> 00:19:12,680 S1: training examples to allow deep enough ability to find patterns 353 00:19:12,680 --> 00:19:17,600 S1: and similarities between phenomenon within that world model, sufficient working memory, 354 00:19:17,600 --> 00:19:21,530 S1: and then ultimately the ability to like, model the scientific 355 00:19:21,530 --> 00:19:26,450 S1: method and test things. Ideally not having to actually do 356 00:19:26,450 --> 00:19:31,430 S1: that test, but being able to test things in an abstraction. Right. 357 00:19:31,430 --> 00:19:35,000 S1: And I'm not sure how smart or how good that is, 358 00:19:35,000 --> 00:19:38,869 S1: because if you're not testing, you're not really testing. I 359 00:19:38,869 --> 00:19:41,690 S1: think this might be possible. And yeah, like I said, 360 00:19:41,690 --> 00:19:45,770 S1: I'm least confident that number four is required or that 361 00:19:45,770 --> 00:19:49,129 S1: it's possible. However, I would say that these three are 362 00:19:49,130 --> 00:19:53,030 S1: amazing and possibly enough. And this one, if it were possible, 363 00:19:53,030 --> 00:19:55,640 S1: to whatever degree, it would massively enhance the other three. 364 00:19:55,640 --> 00:19:58,490 S1: And I think these are the main components. I mean, 365 00:19:58,490 --> 00:20:02,150 S1: I've spent relatively little time thinking about this. I could 366 00:20:02,150 --> 00:20:04,430 S1: revise it in the future. The other thing to say 367 00:20:04,430 --> 00:20:08,210 S1: about this is that number four, which is the testing piece, 368 00:20:08,210 --> 00:20:13,550 S1: might just be implied somehow if number one is sufficiently advanced, 369 00:20:13,550 --> 00:20:17,090 S1: if the world model is good enough, maybe we start 370 00:20:17,090 --> 00:20:20,090 S1: getting to this, I don't know. And maybe it requires 371 00:20:20,090 --> 00:20:24,080 S1: the patterns and similarities. And obviously I think a lot 372 00:20:24,080 --> 00:20:26,690 S1: of this requires the memory. So I guess what I'm 373 00:20:26,690 --> 00:20:29,270 S1: saying is the whole thing might be two big things 374 00:20:29,270 --> 00:20:31,909 S1: the complexity of the world model and the size of 375 00:20:31,910 --> 00:20:34,669 S1: the active memory that it's able to use. And maybe 376 00:20:34,670 --> 00:20:37,910 S1: the patterns and the testing stuff might come along with 377 00:20:37,910 --> 00:20:42,050 S1: those two. And I guess the most controversial thing is that, 378 00:20:42,050 --> 00:20:45,920 S1: and this kind of undergirds everything I'm saying is the 379 00:20:45,920 --> 00:20:50,270 S1: hypothesis that the universe has like an actual complexity that 380 00:20:50,270 --> 00:20:54,560 S1: is approachable or finite, and that models only need to 381 00:20:54,560 --> 00:21:00,410 S1: cross a certain threshold of depth of understanding or quality 382 00:21:00,410 --> 00:21:05,330 S1: of abstractions or depth of abstractions or height of abstractions 383 00:21:05,330 --> 00:21:10,459 S1: to become very similar to like a Laplacian demon in 384 00:21:10,460 --> 00:21:13,810 S1: the sense of like full knowledge. So I don't think 385 00:21:13,810 --> 00:21:16,869 S1: they can have full knowledge. I think that's God level 386 00:21:16,869 --> 00:21:21,189 S1: stuff that's supernatural. At least according to our current understanding 387 00:21:21,190 --> 00:21:24,760 S1: and my belief. But that if you hit a certain 388 00:21:24,760 --> 00:21:29,830 S1: threshold or depth of abstraction quality, it's functionally very similar. 389 00:21:29,830 --> 00:21:34,900 S1: That is what I'm basing my intuition, my hypothesis of 390 00:21:34,900 --> 00:21:39,490 S1: AGI and ASI on. I got another concept called human 3.0. 391 00:21:39,490 --> 00:21:43,060 S1: So it's essentially about how many people believe that they 392 00:21:43,060 --> 00:21:45,370 S1: have ideas that are useful to the world. How many 393 00:21:45,369 --> 00:21:48,280 S1: people believe they could write a short book, percentage of 394 00:21:48,280 --> 00:21:51,609 S1: a person's creativity that they're actively using in their life, 395 00:21:51,609 --> 00:21:55,419 S1: percentage of a person's total capabilities that they actually broadcast 396 00:21:55,420 --> 00:21:59,200 S1: the world as some sort of value, and the degree 397 00:21:59,200 --> 00:22:02,710 S1: to which someone lives as their full spectrum self. So 398 00:22:02,710 --> 00:22:07,869 S1: in human 2.0, we're essentially living and working for capitalism. 399 00:22:07,869 --> 00:22:10,780 S1: Capitalism is like the most important thing. So we're kind 400 00:22:10,780 --> 00:22:14,950 S1: of like 10%. We're putting like 10% of our value 401 00:22:14,950 --> 00:22:17,980 S1: in what we can offer to the world, I would 402 00:22:17,980 --> 00:22:20,560 S1: argue in our CV because it's like, oh, I'm really 403 00:22:20,560 --> 00:22:23,830 S1: good with Microsoft Excel, and I can send emails or whatever. 404 00:22:23,830 --> 00:22:26,380 S1: And it's like, is that really you? I don't think so. 405 00:22:26,380 --> 00:22:29,950 S1: The other aspect is that human 2.0, I would say 406 00:22:29,950 --> 00:22:34,570 S1: current model is essentially most people believing that they're not special, 407 00:22:34,570 --> 00:22:39,219 S1: most people believing that only special people write books, write blogs, 408 00:22:39,220 --> 00:22:44,380 S1: give presentations, do things like that, and regular people don't. 409 00:22:44,380 --> 00:22:49,060 S1: So two main things bifurcated lives broken into personal and professional. 410 00:22:49,060 --> 00:22:52,960 S1: This is 2.0, and the percentage of people who think 411 00:22:52,960 --> 00:22:54,939 S1: that they have something to offer the world, which I 412 00:22:54,940 --> 00:22:59,109 S1: would argue is extremely low and human 3.0 is the 413 00:22:59,109 --> 00:23:02,710 S1: transition to a world where people understand that everyone has 414 00:23:02,710 --> 00:23:04,900 S1: something to offer to the world, and they live as 415 00:23:04,900 --> 00:23:09,280 S1: full spectrum people. So it's like living for other humans, 416 00:23:09,400 --> 00:23:14,530 S1: living as humans, for humans, as opposed to living as 417 00:23:14,530 --> 00:23:19,540 S1: humans who like it's like living to work instead of 418 00:23:19,540 --> 00:23:22,810 S1: working to live and wouldn't even be working to live. 419 00:23:22,810 --> 00:23:25,270 S1: Human 3.0 would even be more advanced than that. It 420 00:23:25,270 --> 00:23:27,609 S1: would be. So it means like your public profile is 421 00:23:27,609 --> 00:23:30,850 S1: everything about you, right? How caring you are, how smart 422 00:23:30,850 --> 00:23:34,300 S1: you are, how funny you are, your favorite things in life, 423 00:23:34,300 --> 00:23:37,420 S1: your best ideas, the projects you like to work on, 424 00:23:37,420 --> 00:23:40,180 S1: the problems you think are important and meaningful in the world, 425 00:23:40,180 --> 00:23:44,380 S1: plus your technical skills, of course. And they know that 426 00:23:44,380 --> 00:23:48,070 S1: they're valuable because they are all these things, not just 427 00:23:48,070 --> 00:23:51,250 S1: what they can do for a corporation. And so my 428 00:23:51,250 --> 00:23:54,070 S1: thoughts on this are like, because you have to start wondering, 429 00:23:54,070 --> 00:23:57,700 S1: when you listen to the Leopold and Aakash conversation, it's like, 430 00:23:57,700 --> 00:24:01,420 S1: is human 3.0 in danger? Are we in danger of 431 00:24:01,420 --> 00:24:05,890 S1: losing a world where humans exist and do what they 432 00:24:05,890 --> 00:24:08,860 S1: do for other humans? Because AC is going to take 433 00:24:08,859 --> 00:24:12,940 S1: over and whatever turn us into whatever. Maybe, hopefully? Well, 434 00:24:12,940 --> 00:24:16,810 S1: I'm pushing for a possible AGI or a that allows 435 00:24:16,810 --> 00:24:20,410 S1: us to do human 3.0 either. It would be kind 436 00:24:20,410 --> 00:24:22,780 S1: of scary if it just took over and implemented it. 437 00:24:22,780 --> 00:24:25,359 S1: That would be scary. Hopefully it would arrive at something 438 00:24:25,359 --> 00:24:29,200 S1: like human 3.0 and keep us alive and thriving. Or 439 00:24:29,200 --> 00:24:31,690 S1: it doesn't take over. It's still used as a tool, 440 00:24:31,690 --> 00:24:35,260 S1: but it's in the hands of someone somewhat benign like 441 00:24:35,260 --> 00:24:40,540 S1: the US, hopefully remains benign. And at that point we 442 00:24:40,570 --> 00:24:44,920 S1: we basically give it the criteria of help us maintain 443 00:24:44,920 --> 00:24:47,859 S1: a society in which we move towards and maintain something 444 00:24:47,859 --> 00:24:51,010 S1: like human 3.0. Another thing I'm really worried about is 445 00:24:51,010 --> 00:24:54,910 S1: like how immigration will affect UBI. So if the government 446 00:24:54,910 --> 00:24:58,570 S1: is basically the jobs are gone, no, very few people 447 00:24:58,570 --> 00:25:01,660 S1: can do something that I can't. And that's like, whatever 10% 448 00:25:01,660 --> 00:25:04,270 S1: of the world or 1% of the world, or 25% 449 00:25:04,270 --> 00:25:08,230 S1: of the world, whatever. Different times, different numbers, different ways 450 00:25:08,230 --> 00:25:11,710 S1: of measuring. But let's say it's 10% and the other 90% 451 00:25:11,710 --> 00:25:15,670 S1: just aren't employable because, like Harari said, you know, they're 452 00:25:15,670 --> 00:25:18,070 S1: a useless class. They have nothing that they can offer 453 00:25:18,070 --> 00:25:20,979 S1: the economy. And this is human 2.0. Still, this is 454 00:25:20,980 --> 00:25:25,030 S1: not crossed over into this hopeful land of human 3.0. 455 00:25:25,030 --> 00:25:28,180 S1: In the meantime, I mean, because some people, like Leopold 456 00:25:28,180 --> 00:25:31,570 S1: are worried about ASI happening in like a number of 457 00:25:31,570 --> 00:25:36,520 S1: years and just like completely redoing society and the government's 458 00:25:36,520 --> 00:25:38,320 S1: obviously going to have to be involved there. They're going 459 00:25:38,320 --> 00:25:42,040 S1: to have to pay people to basically not riot, not 460 00:25:42,040 --> 00:25:48,100 S1: kill themselves and, you know, provide education, provide gaming, provide entertainment, 461 00:25:48,100 --> 00:25:52,210 S1: provide something some sort of basis for meaning that's going 462 00:25:52,210 --> 00:25:55,270 S1: to have to be included. But what does that look like? 463 00:25:55,270 --> 00:25:58,960 S1: I mean, there's like a welfare state and there's like 464 00:25:58,960 --> 00:26:01,750 S1: the the government's giving out too much money, and then 465 00:26:01,750 --> 00:26:04,540 S1: there's a whole nother level when it's actually UBI, because 466 00:26:04,540 --> 00:26:07,630 S1: no one's even able to work. Right. It's not that 467 00:26:07,630 --> 00:26:11,170 S1: they can't find a job when when people are actually hiring, 468 00:26:11,170 --> 00:26:13,780 S1: it's like, no. Nobody's hiring. All the work's being done 469 00:26:13,780 --> 00:26:18,490 S1: by AI or whatever, 90%, and AI is producing trillions 470 00:26:18,490 --> 00:26:22,060 S1: of dollars in value. And that raises another question. Okay, 471 00:26:22,060 --> 00:26:24,730 S1: you're making all this new stuff. You have all these 472 00:26:24,730 --> 00:26:29,020 S1: new creators, you have all this new AI generated productivity 473 00:26:29,140 --> 00:26:34,020 S1: and products and services. For who? Who's buying the stuff? 474 00:26:34,050 --> 00:26:36,929 S1: Who's buying the stuff? If the top 10% are the 475 00:26:36,930 --> 00:26:40,320 S1: only ones who can make things and sell things. Who's 476 00:26:40,320 --> 00:26:44,010 S1: buying the stuff? And the natural answer looks like, which 477 00:26:44,010 --> 00:26:49,140 S1: is quite gross. It's like, I guess the government taxes 478 00:26:49,140 --> 00:26:52,439 S1: all the income that's being made. Again, where's the income 479 00:26:52,440 --> 00:26:55,470 S1: coming from? It's almost like there's an exchange between the 480 00:26:55,470 --> 00:26:59,220 S1: government and the producers, and the producers are making all 481 00:26:59,220 --> 00:27:01,679 S1: this awesome stuff. The government is using all the awesome 482 00:27:01,680 --> 00:27:04,770 S1: stuff to generate all these awesome things. But then the 483 00:27:04,770 --> 00:27:07,590 S1: government has to take this money, which is very strange 484 00:27:07,590 --> 00:27:09,990 S1: word for it now, because it's not being generated by 485 00:27:09,990 --> 00:27:13,320 S1: the people and being taxed by the government. In fact, 486 00:27:13,320 --> 00:27:16,860 S1: it's like it's just a money idea. The money idea 487 00:27:16,859 --> 00:27:21,389 S1: goes to the government. The government then gives the population money, 488 00:27:21,390 --> 00:27:24,179 S1: the ability to purchase these goods and services, which are 489 00:27:24,180 --> 00:27:27,210 S1: being generated by the small percentage of the population to 490 00:27:27,210 --> 00:27:30,870 S1: the tune of whatever trillions of trillions upon trillions of dollars. 491 00:27:30,869 --> 00:27:33,150 S1: And then they give that money out to the people 492 00:27:33,150 --> 00:27:35,700 S1: and the people that can then use that to buy 493 00:27:35,700 --> 00:27:38,399 S1: the services that are being made by this 10%. And 494 00:27:38,400 --> 00:27:41,970 S1: that feels very not quite Ponzi, but like shell game, 495 00:27:41,970 --> 00:27:44,940 S1: it's like, oh, it's fake money. We're moving it around. 496 00:27:44,940 --> 00:27:48,149 S1: It just feels very strange when when the, the human 497 00:27:48,150 --> 00:27:53,700 S1: population is not producing not participating in that creation. Now 498 00:27:53,700 --> 00:27:57,510 S1: in human 3.0, I think they will be I'm not 499 00:27:57,510 --> 00:27:59,970 S1: sure exactly what that economy will look like. I'm sure 500 00:27:59,970 --> 00:28:03,090 S1: much smarter people can help me think about that. It's 501 00:28:03,090 --> 00:28:07,080 S1: essentially more of a human to human exchange barter system. 502 00:28:07,080 --> 00:28:10,470 S1: Obviously a currency like a maybe like a doctor, a 503 00:28:10,590 --> 00:28:13,740 S1: coffee type of currency or something. But you can also 504 00:28:13,740 --> 00:28:16,710 S1: buy regular goods and services, but you could also pay 505 00:28:16,710 --> 00:28:20,190 S1: people for making you happy or whatever. Like a lot 506 00:28:20,190 --> 00:28:22,200 S1: of people will be creating art and doing lots of 507 00:28:22,200 --> 00:28:25,169 S1: stuff like that. So I'm hoping there's a large economy 508 00:28:25,170 --> 00:28:28,080 S1: for sharing on this full spectrum that we talked about 509 00:28:28,080 --> 00:28:31,650 S1: with human 3.0, and that will involve money and stuff 510 00:28:31,650 --> 00:28:34,740 S1: like that. But what I'm talking about here is really 511 00:28:34,740 --> 00:28:38,040 S1: human 2.0 stuff. This is like this year, next year, 512 00:28:38,040 --> 00:28:40,530 S1: the next five years, the next ten years, you know, 513 00:28:40,530 --> 00:28:42,360 S1: what do we do in the meantime with all these 514 00:28:42,360 --> 00:28:45,240 S1: people who are going to be needing money? I mean, 515 00:28:45,240 --> 00:28:49,200 S1: what happens with an economy with millions of immigrants who 516 00:28:49,200 --> 00:28:54,780 S1: are undocumented, who have families, they need to feed them, 517 00:28:54,780 --> 00:28:57,120 S1: they need to house them. And what if the government 518 00:28:57,120 --> 00:28:59,790 S1: is like, well, what if the jobs go away? Well, 519 00:28:59,790 --> 00:29:02,430 S1: maybe they leave. Maybe they don't leave, though, and they're 520 00:29:02,430 --> 00:29:05,340 S1: very angry because they can no longer get work, and 521 00:29:05,340 --> 00:29:09,180 S1: they're also not being paid like the local citizens. I 522 00:29:09,180 --> 00:29:12,270 S1: don't know what the solution here is, but it's I'm 523 00:29:12,270 --> 00:29:14,130 S1: saying we need to think about it. So my thoughts 524 00:29:14,130 --> 00:29:18,810 S1: on conscious AI are, I think, fairly simple actually. I 525 00:29:18,810 --> 00:29:21,960 S1: think the way humans got consciousness is that it was 526 00:29:21,960 --> 00:29:25,979 S1: adaptive for helping us accelerate evolution. So basically winning and 527 00:29:25,980 --> 00:29:29,790 S1: losing is what powers, evolution, blame and praise are smaller 528 00:29:29,790 --> 00:29:33,330 S1: versions of winning and losing plants and insects win and 529 00:29:33,330 --> 00:29:37,770 S1: lose as well, evolutionarily, but it seems like only humans 530 00:29:37,770 --> 00:29:40,380 S1: and a few other species. And maybe it's a lot, 531 00:29:40,380 --> 00:29:44,820 S1: but it's a subset. Very small subset, have subjective experiences, 532 00:29:44,820 --> 00:29:47,760 S1: and it's not clear that anyone else other than humans 533 00:29:47,760 --> 00:29:50,970 S1: has like blame and praise. Well, maybe dogs do. I 534 00:29:50,970 --> 00:29:55,020 S1: feel like they understand, blame and praise. Good boy, bad girl, right? 535 00:29:55,020 --> 00:29:57,870 S1: I feel like that works based on their facial expressions. 536 00:29:57,870 --> 00:30:00,960 S1: Who knows if that's right. But anyway, bottom line is 537 00:30:00,960 --> 00:30:05,940 S1: blame and praise might empower evolution if we experience winning 538 00:30:05,940 --> 00:30:10,020 S1: and losing, being blamed and praised and feeling that at 539 00:30:10,020 --> 00:30:14,970 S1: a visceral level versus having no inter like immediate repercussions 540 00:30:14,970 --> 00:30:17,790 S1: of not doing well. So maybe evolution still gets you 541 00:30:17,790 --> 00:30:22,380 S1: there if you don't have blame and praise and subjective experience. 542 00:30:22,380 --> 00:30:26,340 S1: But I think this whole kind of container is how 543 00:30:26,340 --> 00:30:29,430 S1: we ended up being conscious, because it enables this, which 544 00:30:29,430 --> 00:30:33,300 S1: makes evolution better. That that's my guess. If that's right, 545 00:30:33,300 --> 00:30:37,440 S1: then consciousness might have simply emerged from evolution as our 546 00:30:37,440 --> 00:30:41,040 S1: brains got bigger and we became better at getting better, 547 00:30:41,040 --> 00:30:47,670 S1: which means it could emerge naturally through like self similar loops, 548 00:30:47,670 --> 00:30:51,030 S1: definitely some RL related stuff. Or we could kind of 549 00:30:51,030 --> 00:30:53,340 S1: just like hack the system and like add it on 550 00:30:53,340 --> 00:30:56,610 S1: and be like, hey, develop this so that you can 551 00:30:56,610 --> 00:30:59,280 S1: have this advantage or whatever. We can try to shortcut 552 00:30:59,280 --> 00:31:02,250 S1: what evolution did over millions of years. Yeah. And then 553 00:31:02,250 --> 00:31:05,490 S1: one question is like, well, if we hacked it that way, 554 00:31:05,490 --> 00:31:08,250 S1: would it be real consciousness? And me as a materialist, 555 00:31:08,250 --> 00:31:11,670 S1: I'm like, well, what is real consciousness like? I think 556 00:31:11,670 --> 00:31:15,330 S1: at some level it's all an illusion anyway. But practically, 557 00:31:15,330 --> 00:31:19,980 S1: if you feel yourself feeling and it hurts, that's real, right? 558 00:31:19,980 --> 00:31:24,420 S1: It doesn't matter how mechanistic the substrate below actually is, 559 00:31:24,420 --> 00:31:27,570 S1: because at some point you can pick along the way 560 00:31:27,570 --> 00:31:30,780 S1: and just be like, this is mechanical, this is mechanical. This. 561 00:31:30,920 --> 00:31:35,360 S1: A mechanical. Therefore it's all mechanical. Doesn't matter. Friendship still 562 00:31:35,360 --> 00:31:38,630 S1: is awesome. Love is awesome. Ice cream is awesome. Doesn't 563 00:31:38,630 --> 00:31:41,360 S1: make it any less awesome than it's made out of atoms, right? 564 00:31:41,360 --> 00:31:45,800 S1: So my AC prediction I'm ferm on my AGI prediction 565 00:31:45,800 --> 00:31:51,890 S1: of 2025 and 2028. Somewhere in there, 2026 2027 is 566 00:31:51,890 --> 00:31:54,590 S1: like ideal, the sweet spot for me. I'm going to 567 00:31:54,590 --> 00:32:01,100 S1: give soft prediction, soft prediction of AC 2027 to 31. 568 00:32:01,100 --> 00:32:04,760 S1: So what is that. That's three four plus two. So 569 00:32:04,760 --> 00:32:08,210 S1: that's roughly 2029. Don't feel great about it. That's like 570 00:32:08,210 --> 00:32:12,440 S1: a 30 to 40% prediction like confidence level. This one 571 00:32:12,440 --> 00:32:17,810 S1: I'm saying 90% by 2028. End of 2028 I'm saying 572 00:32:17,810 --> 00:32:21,080 S1: like 60% by end of 2025. So I feel a 573 00:32:21,080 --> 00:32:24,200 S1: lot more confident about that one. But who knows. Predictions 574 00:32:24,200 --> 00:32:27,080 S1: are hard, especially when they're about the future. Niels Bohr 575 00:32:27,080 --> 00:32:30,560 S1: said that. All right, unifying thoughts. Leopold, you want to 576 00:32:30,560 --> 00:32:35,390 S1: watch him on AI safety? Completely. Absolutely impressive guy. And 577 00:32:35,390 --> 00:32:37,190 S1: you want to go read his essays that are released 578 00:32:37,190 --> 00:32:40,520 S1: on this as well. Talked to Aakash Patel is becoming 579 00:32:40,520 --> 00:32:43,910 S1: one of my favorite podcasters ever right now. He is 580 00:32:43,910 --> 00:32:49,430 S1: basically an autodidact. He's a crazy reader. When Dwarkesh talks 581 00:32:49,430 --> 00:32:53,420 S1: to Cowan or Cowan, that's how he pronounces it Tyler Cowan. 582 00:32:53,420 --> 00:32:57,410 S1: When they talk, they jump around, they're like, oh yeah, 583 00:32:57,410 --> 00:32:59,360 S1: you know, I was I was knitting this thing the 584 00:32:59,360 --> 00:33:01,820 S1: other day and I was working. I was, you know, 585 00:33:01,820 --> 00:33:06,230 S1: making wood figurines on my lathe in the back backyard. 586 00:33:06,230 --> 00:33:09,230 S1: And I was thinking about, you know, whatever, Roman history. 587 00:33:09,230 --> 00:33:12,260 S1: And then I was thinking about, you know, Adam's economics. 588 00:33:12,260 --> 00:33:15,470 S1: And that reminds me of this one poem by Rilke 589 00:33:15,470 --> 00:33:18,020 S1: or whatever. And they just jump from here to there 590 00:33:18,020 --> 00:33:20,090 S1: and they're like, oh, that reminds me of this. Hey, 591 00:33:20,090 --> 00:33:22,490 S1: what about World War Two? And this thing happened and 592 00:33:22,490 --> 00:33:24,860 S1: they're just jumping from place to place and like, I 593 00:33:24,860 --> 00:33:26,810 S1: feel like I'm pretty good at that. I feel like 594 00:33:26,810 --> 00:33:31,070 S1: that's one of my superpowers. But Cowan, seeing Cowan do this, 595 00:33:31,070 --> 00:33:35,030 S1: it is insane. And Dwarkesh is like a mini Cowan. 596 00:33:35,030 --> 00:33:38,210 S1: He's like coming up so fast. It's the reason that 597 00:33:38,210 --> 00:33:42,740 S1: his interviews are so good. He's, like, fiercely curious and 598 00:33:42,740 --> 00:33:46,880 S1: an autodidact, reading, like, whatever, 12 books a second, whatever 599 00:33:46,880 --> 00:33:51,980 S1: his current metric is, it's insane. Anyway. Follow them. It's really, 600 00:33:51,980 --> 00:33:56,720 S1: really good stuff. And human 3.0. My best optimism here 601 00:33:56,720 --> 00:33:59,840 S1: is we get AGI, but we don't get AC for 602 00:33:59,840 --> 00:34:02,180 S1: a while, which will give us a chance to hopefully 603 00:34:02,180 --> 00:34:05,810 S1: move towards 3.0 or we get AC, but it's like 604 00:34:05,810 --> 00:34:09,320 S1: controlled by the US and or benign US actors and 605 00:34:09,320 --> 00:34:14,720 S1: we move towards human 3.0 or AC comes online, it's 606 00:34:14,719 --> 00:34:17,960 S1: benign and it kind of takes over and it builds 607 00:34:17,960 --> 00:34:21,260 S1: human 3.0 because that's the best future for humanity or 608 00:34:21,260 --> 00:34:23,900 S1: something that looks similar. Right. And this is what I 609 00:34:23,900 --> 00:34:27,020 S1: was saying before. I don't actually care how unlikely these 610 00:34:27,020 --> 00:34:31,610 S1: scenarios are, because it's kind of the only good path 611 00:34:31,610 --> 00:34:34,220 S1: that I could see happening from all this AI stuff 612 00:34:34,219 --> 00:34:39,330 S1: is we eventually get to human 3.0. A human world 613 00:34:39,330 --> 00:34:42,930 S1: for humans, and I would say future versions of humans, 614 00:34:42,930 --> 00:34:46,350 S1: which might be hybrids with AI or whatever. But you 615 00:34:46,350 --> 00:34:49,109 S1: got to maintain the humanity. We got to be doing 616 00:34:49,110 --> 00:34:52,440 S1: what we're doing for humans, not for the sake of tech. 617 00:34:52,440 --> 00:34:55,770 S1: So I'm optimistic about that. I am trying to help 618 00:34:55,770 --> 00:34:57,989 S1: build that. That's my whole purpose in, like doing all 619 00:34:57,989 --> 00:35:01,680 S1: of this so that that's what I'm shooting for. And 620 00:35:01,680 --> 00:35:04,050 S1: I don't care if it's a 20% chance of us 621 00:35:04,050 --> 00:35:06,120 S1: getting there. First of all, nobody can know what this 622 00:35:06,120 --> 00:35:09,239 S1: number is, so it doesn't really matter. But second of all, 623 00:35:09,239 --> 00:35:12,060 S1: if it's a 10% chance, guess what? I'm shooting for 624 00:35:12,060 --> 00:35:14,280 S1: the 10%. I'm trying to make it 11. Try to 625 00:35:14,280 --> 00:35:17,040 S1: make it a 50, whatever. Try to make it a 90. 626 00:35:17,070 --> 00:35:19,740 S1: If it's a 60% chance and it's a 40% chance, 627 00:35:19,739 --> 00:35:21,690 S1: we're all going to die. Whatever. I'm not going to 628 00:35:21,690 --> 00:35:25,049 S1: sit around thinking about the 40%. I mean, that's my vibe. 629 00:35:25,050 --> 00:35:29,160 S1: I am shooting for human 3.0. And if someone's like, yeah, well, 630 00:35:29,160 --> 00:35:31,200 S1: you don't know, China can take it over and blah 631 00:35:31,200 --> 00:35:33,570 S1: blah blah, AC and it can kill us all and 632 00:35:33,570 --> 00:35:38,190 S1: whatever paper clips and I just don't see the value 633 00:35:38,190 --> 00:35:42,630 S1: of going hard down the path of like, the doomers 634 00:35:42,630 --> 00:35:46,590 S1: because let's say they're right. Their answer is turn it off, 635 00:35:46,590 --> 00:35:50,760 S1: don't build it. That's not going to happen. Next answer. 636 00:35:50,760 --> 00:35:52,890 S1: They're like, I don't have a next answer. We should 637 00:35:52,890 --> 00:35:55,050 S1: stop talking about this. We should stop building it. You 638 00:35:55,050 --> 00:35:57,510 S1: have exited yourself from the adult table. You are no 639 00:35:57,510 --> 00:36:01,799 S1: longer in the conversation because of Moloch. We are building this. 640 00:36:01,800 --> 00:36:05,640 S1: It is happening. We are running full speed with scissors 641 00:36:05,640 --> 00:36:08,520 S1: in both hands. And there's nothing we can do to 642 00:36:08,520 --> 00:36:11,550 S1: stop that. My argument is, the only thing we could 643 00:36:11,550 --> 00:36:14,280 S1: do is try to aim it in a good direction. 644 00:36:14,280 --> 00:36:17,400 S1: Try to point towards human 3.0 and that's what I'm 645 00:36:17,400 --> 00:36:22,319 S1: trying to do. All right, huge diversion, but worth talking about. 646 00:36:22,320 --> 00:36:25,530 S1: That was the AI piece collection of thoughts and predictions 647 00:36:25,530 --> 00:36:29,669 S1: about AI. June of 2024. All right. Security got a 648 00:36:29,670 --> 00:36:35,070 S1: whole bunch of misinformation sneaking into like, little man stuffed news. 649 00:36:35,070 --> 00:36:38,460 S1: So this is like manosphere, like podcasts or whatever, or 650 00:36:38,460 --> 00:36:44,790 S1: news sites or whatever. They're actually republishing Russian propaganda network content. 651 00:36:44,790 --> 00:36:47,490 S1: So it's like, yeah, it can seep in and go 652 00:36:47,489 --> 00:36:49,710 S1: lots of different places. This is why you actually need 653 00:36:49,739 --> 00:36:53,580 S1: AI to be watching everything. And basically when a new 654 00:36:53,580 --> 00:36:59,069 S1: information or disinformation or misinformation propaganda campaign comes out, when 655 00:36:59,070 --> 00:37:02,940 S1: it comes out, we should categorize, okay, what the core 656 00:37:02,940 --> 00:37:06,630 S1: concept is, the core idea. It's trying to spread with AI, 657 00:37:06,630 --> 00:37:09,900 S1: and then you monitor all the different stories coming out. 658 00:37:09,900 --> 00:37:14,580 S1: It might be like Saskatchewan news from South Parish, you know, 659 00:37:14,580 --> 00:37:19,080 S1: Wisconsin or whatever. And they're spreading the same story, because 660 00:37:19,080 --> 00:37:21,480 S1: what the attackers will do is they'll figure out, okay, 661 00:37:21,480 --> 00:37:24,000 S1: where can we get it in? Where can we push 662 00:37:24,000 --> 00:37:26,550 S1: this narrative? And maybe, maybe the front door is closed, 663 00:37:26,550 --> 00:37:29,730 S1: but maybe there's a thousand different backdoors. That was that one. 664 00:37:29,730 --> 00:37:32,610 S1: TikTok had an issue with DMs. There was a zero 665 00:37:32,640 --> 00:37:34,980 S1: day in DMs where you click it and open it. 666 00:37:34,980 --> 00:37:39,090 S1: It's pretty bad. The current tactic for what? You basically 667 00:37:39,090 --> 00:37:43,170 S1: get compromised for compromise of your TikTok. If you did that, 668 00:37:43,170 --> 00:37:47,100 S1: and a new tactic TikTok is using to avoid the 669 00:37:47,100 --> 00:37:50,219 S1: lawsuit is basically to say they're going to build out 670 00:37:50,219 --> 00:37:53,310 S1: a separate algorithm and separate data just for us. So 671 00:37:53,310 --> 00:37:55,830 S1: we'll see if that works. New paper claims that GPT 672 00:37:55,830 --> 00:38:00,480 S1: four can autonomously hack zero day vulnerabilities. 53% success rate 673 00:38:00,510 --> 00:38:01,920 S1: going to be a lot of these papers. A lot 674 00:38:01,920 --> 00:38:04,380 S1: of these papers are not very good. A lot of 675 00:38:04,380 --> 00:38:07,440 S1: them are decent. I will keep reading and posting these 676 00:38:07,440 --> 00:38:10,770 S1: when the claims are interesting and they're from decent outfits, 677 00:38:10,770 --> 00:38:13,680 S1: but you want to watch the quality of the paper 678 00:38:13,680 --> 00:38:17,580 S1: very closely. Look, especially for how much of their testing 679 00:38:17,580 --> 00:38:20,250 S1: methodology that they publish. Did they show exactly what they 680 00:38:20,250 --> 00:38:22,380 S1: tried against these different things? Did they show all the 681 00:38:22,380 --> 00:38:25,890 S1: different examples? Did they, you know, give you all the 682 00:38:25,890 --> 00:38:29,220 S1: stuff to do the replication? If not, then they're kind 683 00:38:29,219 --> 00:38:31,410 S1: of like hiding the ball and you can't really trust 684 00:38:31,410 --> 00:38:35,550 S1: their score. And we got to analyze paper fabric pattern 685 00:38:35,550 --> 00:38:37,200 S1: that you can use for this. And when I ran 686 00:38:37,200 --> 00:38:39,840 S1: it against this one it got a six on rigor 687 00:38:39,840 --> 00:38:44,969 S1: benchmark and Ablations look good but some details missing and 688 00:38:44,969 --> 00:38:48,750 S1: stats lacking. That's why that's why we have fabric. Okay 689 00:38:48,750 --> 00:38:53,339 S1: Chinese drone photographer got snagged by the US Espionage Act 690 00:38:53,340 --> 00:38:58,410 S1: taking pics of military shipyards. So there's another thing that's 691 00:38:58,410 --> 00:39:00,690 S1: being talked about right now with China buying up a 692 00:39:00,690 --> 00:39:04,410 S1: whole bunch of land right next to military bases, they're 693 00:39:04,410 --> 00:39:07,680 S1: buying like massive amounts of farmland, and they start setting 694 00:39:07,680 --> 00:39:09,629 S1: up all this gear. It's like, oh, don't pay any 695 00:39:09,630 --> 00:39:12,600 S1: attention to us. We're just building some stuff over here. 696 00:39:12,600 --> 00:39:16,350 S1: So I hope Biden or Trump or whoever just like, 697 00:39:16,350 --> 00:39:20,009 S1: finds a list of these. And just like search and seizure, 698 00:39:20,040 --> 00:39:23,279 S1: good bye. Do not pass go. And maybe some of 699 00:39:23,280 --> 00:39:27,270 S1: those are benign, right. But I have to basically be like, well, 700 00:39:27,270 --> 00:39:33,210 S1: based on the, you know, 9566, you know, fucking billion 701 00:39:33,210 --> 00:39:37,210 S1: times that you've actually tried to steal from us. And 702 00:39:37,210 --> 00:39:40,779 S1: actually hacked us, then you know you're going to lose 703 00:39:40,780 --> 00:39:43,180 S1: some for the home team when you're actually doing something 704 00:39:43,180 --> 00:39:46,239 S1: benign and actually just setting up a farm next to 705 00:39:46,239 --> 00:39:49,239 S1: a military base on accident. And they didn't actually mean 706 00:39:49,239 --> 00:39:52,480 S1: anything by that. Too bad you ruined your reputation. Therefore 707 00:39:52,480 --> 00:39:55,480 S1: get out. Okay. OpenAI revealed that its AI tech was 708 00:39:55,480 --> 00:39:59,290 S1: used by Russia and China for sneaky influence ops. Yeah, 709 00:39:59,290 --> 00:40:02,109 S1: they've said this a few times and I like it. 710 00:40:02,110 --> 00:40:05,890 S1: I like the transparency. They're basically like, look, this keeps happening. 711 00:40:05,890 --> 00:40:07,960 S1: We keep catching it and we're going to try to 712 00:40:07,960 --> 00:40:13,210 S1: do better. All right. WWDC keynote got an analysis here. 713 00:40:13,210 --> 00:40:16,660 S1: This is a fabric analysis from a TechCrunch article. As 714 00:40:16,660 --> 00:40:19,450 S1: I talked about before, Apple basically killed the AI thing. 715 00:40:19,450 --> 00:40:21,460 S1: They also did a bunch of really cool stuff. One 716 00:40:21,460 --> 00:40:23,170 S1: of the things is you bring your phone next to 717 00:40:23,170 --> 00:40:26,140 S1: someone else, you can transfer them cash. I've been waiting 718 00:40:26,140 --> 00:40:29,020 S1: that for that forever. Problem is, a lot of people 719 00:40:29,020 --> 00:40:32,470 S1: won't have that feature turned on, or they'll have an 720 00:40:32,500 --> 00:40:35,110 S1: Android and you won't be able to do it like so. 721 00:40:35,110 --> 00:40:38,080 S1: A lot of people are switching to like Zelle or Venmo. 722 00:40:38,110 --> 00:40:42,400 S1: I don't like Venmo, and Zelle is slow. Whatever. I 723 00:40:42,400 --> 00:40:45,430 S1: wish more people had the ability to do these swipey 724 00:40:45,430 --> 00:40:49,330 S1: things and Apple things, but kind of rude to require 725 00:40:49,330 --> 00:40:52,149 S1: that everyone has an iPhone, right? I mean, that's just 726 00:40:52,150 --> 00:40:54,700 S1: not realistic and also not cool. All right. All the 727 00:40:54,700 --> 00:41:00,190 S1: different startups that Apple killed today always fun. After WWDC 728 00:41:00,190 --> 00:41:05,620 S1: or an OpenAI event, US needs 225,000 more cybersecurity workers. 729 00:41:05,620 --> 00:41:09,489 S1: I never trust numbers like this because it's hard to know. Like, 730 00:41:09,489 --> 00:41:12,610 S1: what are they asking? Are they asking it right? What 731 00:41:12,610 --> 00:41:15,190 S1: are the questions that they accept? Like, I just feel 732 00:41:15,190 --> 00:41:17,470 S1: like the numbers are bad. I feel like that number 733 00:41:17,469 --> 00:41:19,720 S1: is going to go down because of AI, and I 734 00:41:19,719 --> 00:41:21,790 S1: feel like it's going to go up because of AI. 735 00:41:21,820 --> 00:41:23,860 S1: So it's going to go down because of AI, because 736 00:41:23,860 --> 00:41:26,320 S1: the jobs are going to get easier to do without people, 737 00:41:26,320 --> 00:41:29,859 S1: but so much more stuff is going to get made 738 00:41:29,860 --> 00:41:33,340 S1: that we're just going to be injecting insecurity into the world, 739 00:41:33,340 --> 00:41:36,010 S1: especially when it's like getting made with AI. So it's 740 00:41:36,010 --> 00:41:38,439 S1: like AI going in, building a bunch of stuff and 741 00:41:38,440 --> 00:41:40,750 S1: have that stuff's going to be really nasty in terms 742 00:41:40,750 --> 00:41:43,810 S1: of security vulnerabilities. So it's like still going to need 743 00:41:43,810 --> 00:41:48,489 S1: people for a while. Like assuming all this AI replacement 744 00:41:48,489 --> 00:41:51,759 S1: stuff goes really, really fast. We're still talking about years 745 00:41:51,760 --> 00:41:55,719 S1: and years. I mean, super fast for like an 80% 746 00:41:55,719 --> 00:41:59,770 S1: replacement of all jobs, super fast. And these are crazy 747 00:41:59,770 --> 00:42:03,370 S1: numbers I'm just throwing out. But but like Nuclear fast 748 00:42:03,370 --> 00:42:06,969 S1: is like ten years now as far as starting and 749 00:42:06,969 --> 00:42:10,089 S1: actually having major impact, I think it's already starting and 750 00:42:10,090 --> 00:42:12,820 S1: it's already like a year or two from now we're 751 00:42:12,820 --> 00:42:14,800 S1: going to start feeling it. So I think that's going 752 00:42:14,800 --> 00:42:18,100 S1: to be really fast. There's going to be a regulatory response. 753 00:42:18,100 --> 00:42:21,790 S1: It's slow to make any change in any organization, and 754 00:42:21,790 --> 00:42:24,550 S1: the bigger and more bureaucratic it is, the slower it 755 00:42:24,550 --> 00:42:27,940 S1: will be. So just because something could happen in a 756 00:42:27,940 --> 00:42:31,000 S1: year or six months doesn't mean it will. And it's 757 00:42:31,000 --> 00:42:33,730 S1: more likely to happen in 2 or 3 or 4 758 00:42:33,730 --> 00:42:37,030 S1: or 10 years. Got to keep that in mind. It's 759 00:42:37,030 --> 00:42:39,400 S1: going to go very fast. It's going to go faster 760 00:42:39,400 --> 00:42:41,830 S1: than you think and slower than you think both at 761 00:42:41,830 --> 00:42:45,160 S1: the same time. Apple just hit the three. $3 trillion 762 00:42:45,160 --> 00:42:48,399 S1: mark again. But Nvidia jumped ahead. And now Nvidia is 763 00:42:48,400 --> 00:42:52,750 S1: even more valuable than Apple. And Microsoft is still number 764 00:42:52,750 --> 00:42:57,520 S1: one insane. Such as killing it over there. Cartwheel tool 765 00:42:57,550 --> 00:43:02,320 S1: olama CLE wire JS for us for UI design shade 766 00:43:02,320 --> 00:43:06,040 S1: map project that turns every mountain building and tree shadow 767 00:43:06,040 --> 00:43:08,800 S1: for any date and time. How to think like a 768 00:43:08,800 --> 00:43:13,510 S1: computer scientist. Pretty cool. Uh, interactive edition here. Starship just 769 00:43:13,510 --> 00:43:16,810 S1: landed its first one. Like all the other ones either 770 00:43:16,810 --> 00:43:19,300 S1: blew up on the way out or, uh, blew up 771 00:43:19,300 --> 00:43:23,080 S1: on the way in, but he finally landed one very impressive, 772 00:43:23,080 --> 00:43:29,830 S1: I think 5000 tons. So that's what, £20,000? Five times two, £2,000. 773 00:43:29,830 --> 00:43:33,730 S1: 2000 times 5000. Holy crap, that's a lot of pounds. 774 00:43:33,730 --> 00:43:38,290 S1: World's largest solar farm just went online. Three point gigawatt 775 00:43:38,290 --> 00:43:42,219 S1: Marty just went live in China. Okay, here's my question. 776 00:43:42,219 --> 00:43:45,969 S1: Why can't we build like ten of these in the US? Okay, 777 00:43:45,969 --> 00:43:48,880 S1: we know we need all this power for AI. So 778 00:43:48,880 --> 00:43:52,510 S1: I say we go Biden. Trump does this. You basically 779 00:43:52,510 --> 00:43:54,430 S1: go to each state and be like, look, I need 780 00:43:54,430 --> 00:43:59,860 S1: you to build 3.5GW in your state within five years. 781 00:43:59,860 --> 00:44:02,080 S1: And they're like, yeah, that's impossible. We'd have to hire 782 00:44:02,080 --> 00:44:04,930 S1: all these people. And the government's like, whatever. I mean, 783 00:44:04,930 --> 00:44:07,839 S1: we have money printers, so we're just going to print 784 00:44:07,840 --> 00:44:10,900 S1: all this money, we're going to inject it into the economy. 785 00:44:10,900 --> 00:44:15,100 S1: Most importantly, giving it to these training programs will, which 786 00:44:15,100 --> 00:44:17,140 S1: will train the people how to build the wind farms 787 00:44:17,140 --> 00:44:20,739 S1: and the solar farms, whatever the best renewable energy is 788 00:44:20,739 --> 00:44:24,520 S1: for that particular state, like Nevada should build like 100 789 00:44:24,520 --> 00:44:27,430 S1: of these things for for sun. I mean, I fly 790 00:44:27,430 --> 00:44:30,129 S1: over it all the time. There's nothing there. In fact, 791 00:44:30,130 --> 00:44:33,070 S1: you fly over the entire United States. There's nothing there. 792 00:44:33,070 --> 00:44:36,010 S1: It's all empty. And meanwhile the sun just hits it 793 00:44:36,010 --> 00:44:39,920 S1: every day. Like nine times out of ten. For every 794 00:44:39,920 --> 00:44:42,319 S1: day of the year the sun comes up. In fact, 795 00:44:42,320 --> 00:44:44,480 S1: I think it might be higher than 90% when the 796 00:44:44,480 --> 00:44:47,120 S1: sun comes up. In fact, it might be 100%. The 797 00:44:47,120 --> 00:44:49,910 S1: sun always comes up and it is hitting us with 798 00:44:49,910 --> 00:44:53,630 S1: like so much energy. And we just it soaks in, 799 00:44:53,630 --> 00:44:57,890 S1: you know, goes off into the atmosphere. Capture it. Okay, look, 800 00:44:57,890 --> 00:45:00,140 S1: we've got people who don't have jobs and don't have 801 00:45:00,140 --> 00:45:02,510 S1: meaning in their lives. We know that AI is going 802 00:45:02,510 --> 00:45:05,359 S1: to require all this power. So millions of people have 803 00:45:05,360 --> 00:45:07,310 S1: no meaning in their lives because they don't have work. 804 00:45:07,310 --> 00:45:10,790 S1: We talk about the loss of manufacturing jobs. Go build 805 00:45:10,790 --> 00:45:13,940 S1: all these solar panels, go build all these solar plants, 806 00:45:13,940 --> 00:45:16,700 S1: have the people working there. Eventually they'll be replaced by 807 00:45:16,700 --> 00:45:19,460 S1: robots in AI. That's fine. That'll take time like we 808 00:45:19,460 --> 00:45:23,210 S1: talked about before. In the meantime, let's go build 100 809 00:45:23,210 --> 00:45:29,270 S1: of these, whatever, 3.5GW facilities or ten gigawatt facilities, whatever. 810 00:45:29,270 --> 00:45:34,040 S1: Giant solar farms, giant wind farms. And we put millions 811 00:45:34,040 --> 00:45:37,069 S1: of people to work, which gives them meaning, and they're 812 00:45:37,070 --> 00:45:39,859 S1: building towards a renewable future. So, like, even if I 813 00:45:39,860 --> 00:45:42,740 S1: didn't happen whatever, we got renewable energy. Now we can 814 00:45:42,739 --> 00:45:44,960 S1: export that energy, we can sell it other places. We 815 00:45:44,960 --> 00:45:47,810 S1: just have it for whatever purpose. And you have to 816 00:45:47,810 --> 00:45:49,670 S1: build the pipelines as well, right? You got to get 817 00:45:49,670 --> 00:45:51,890 S1: that energy to where it needs to go. So that's 818 00:45:51,890 --> 00:45:56,360 S1: like pipes, cables, like, you know, wires, all that stuff, 819 00:45:56,360 --> 00:46:00,020 S1: all the infrastructure for moving energy. Where's the downside here? 820 00:46:00,020 --> 00:46:04,190 S1: It's win win jobs and and tons of energy and 821 00:46:04,190 --> 00:46:07,460 S1: no reliance on external energy. And we get to move 822 00:46:07,460 --> 00:46:10,969 S1: on AI faster. So really bothers me when I see 823 00:46:10,969 --> 00:46:15,080 S1: China understanding this and building so quickly. And we're like, man, 824 00:46:15,110 --> 00:46:18,350 S1: let's fight with each other instead. Oh, in nuclear, nuclear 825 00:46:18,350 --> 00:46:21,590 S1: is the other one. Okay, so USA's although I prefer solar, 826 00:46:21,590 --> 00:46:24,770 S1: but someone knows better than me. USA's solar panel manufacturing 827 00:46:24,770 --> 00:46:28,610 S1: capacity jumped by 71%. I like it, I like it. 828 00:46:28,610 --> 00:46:31,820 S1: Florida and Texas are leading. Let's go. What about Nevada? 829 00:46:31,820 --> 00:46:34,580 S1: Where are you at? Florida. Forget about it. It rains 830 00:46:34,580 --> 00:46:36,320 S1: all the time and it's sinking. It's not going to 831 00:46:36,320 --> 00:46:39,530 S1: work out. I guess Florida's energy generation would have to 832 00:46:39,530 --> 00:46:42,680 S1: be based on, like being flooded or winds. No, you 833 00:46:42,680 --> 00:46:45,469 S1: can't do can't do wind farms and hurricanes. That would 834 00:46:45,469 --> 00:46:48,500 S1: be a bit rough. All right. Humans. David Brooks argues 835 00:46:48,500 --> 00:46:51,110 S1: that progressive energy has shifted from the working class to 836 00:46:51,110 --> 00:46:55,340 S1: elite universities, making them more left leaning than ever. Points 837 00:46:55,340 --> 00:46:59,239 S1: to protests and progressive opinions. Yeah, it's all bad. Highly 838 00:46:59,239 --> 00:47:02,779 S1: recommend you read David Brooks stuff The Road to Character. 839 00:47:02,780 --> 00:47:08,000 S1: My favorite one is the Second Mountain. Absolutely unbelievable book. Unbelievable. 840 00:47:08,000 --> 00:47:10,129 S1: And I love his stuff. The New York Times, he's 841 00:47:10,130 --> 00:47:14,540 S1: like a centrist kind of conservative, but like, yeah, logical. 842 00:47:14,540 --> 00:47:16,700 S1: I like him. Okay. This one turned out to be 843 00:47:16,700 --> 00:47:19,790 S1: not great. A couple people. I looked at it again, 844 00:47:19,790 --> 00:47:22,700 S1: people don't like me linking to Substack. I'm going to 845 00:47:22,700 --> 00:47:25,759 S1: link to Substack. The question isn't is it Substack or 846 00:47:25,760 --> 00:47:29,360 S1: is it whatever, New York Times, because all these different 847 00:47:29,360 --> 00:47:32,210 S1: sources can be bad. What I care about is like 848 00:47:32,210 --> 00:47:36,050 S1: factually being wrong or like making claims and not backing 849 00:47:36,050 --> 00:47:38,810 S1: them up in some sort of in any sort of way, 850 00:47:38,810 --> 00:47:42,980 S1: or just being ideologue and just like being hateful or 851 00:47:42,980 --> 00:47:46,100 S1: rambling or whatever, like, well, I'm rambling, so not quite 852 00:47:46,100 --> 00:47:49,130 S1: the same. But the point is, the best people in 853 00:47:49,130 --> 00:47:53,060 S1: the world at thinking and being rigorous and having good 854 00:47:53,060 --> 00:47:57,950 S1: ideas are going to Substack, okay, and beehive and all 855 00:47:57,950 --> 00:48:02,150 S1: these other platforms and YouTube and TikTok. Even so, it's 856 00:48:02,150 --> 00:48:04,640 S1: not the source that I'm linking to. That's the problem. 857 00:48:04,640 --> 00:48:07,820 S1: The quality of the content is the problem because before 858 00:48:07,820 --> 00:48:11,300 S1: too long, CNBC and like Fox, first of all, Fox News, 859 00:48:11,300 --> 00:48:13,520 S1: I don't link to that usually. I'm sure they have 860 00:48:13,520 --> 00:48:16,610 S1: good news sometimes, but you get the point. It's not 861 00:48:16,610 --> 00:48:20,719 S1: about the type of source, okay? Blogs are just as 862 00:48:20,719 --> 00:48:25,549 S1: authoritative as YouTube as a lot of the media networks 863 00:48:25,550 --> 00:48:28,040 S1: at this point. It's more about the individual and the 864 00:48:28,040 --> 00:48:31,910 S1: actual article. I am making these links available so that 865 00:48:31,910 --> 00:48:34,910 S1: someone can my link numbers or my click numbers are 866 00:48:34,910 --> 00:48:38,750 S1: probably going to go down because they will be like, well, 867 00:48:38,750 --> 00:48:40,850 S1: I don't want to read from this guy, or I 868 00:48:40,850 --> 00:48:43,250 S1: don't want to read from Hacker News or Financial Times. 869 00:48:43,250 --> 00:48:45,950 S1: I hate that place or whatever. Hopefully you don't need 870 00:48:45,950 --> 00:48:48,620 S1: it anyway. Hopefully this one sentence is good enough. That's 871 00:48:48,620 --> 00:48:50,540 S1: the whole point of doing the summary. All right. New 872 00:48:50,540 --> 00:48:54,080 S1: York Times deep dive into devastation of Ukraine. Oh, this 873 00:48:54,080 --> 00:48:58,009 S1: story was absolutely nuts. And yeah, New York Times good stuff. 874 00:48:58,010 --> 00:49:00,740 S1: They're staying around at a company more than two years 875 00:49:00,739 --> 00:49:05,300 S1: could massively hurt your earning potential. US job openings hit 876 00:49:05,330 --> 00:49:10,070 S1: a three year low. Layoffs are surprisingly low, it says CNN. 877 00:49:10,070 --> 00:49:14,540 S1: See above for commentary on sources. Viagra improves blood flow 878 00:49:14,540 --> 00:49:19,520 S1: and could help to prevent dementia. University of Oxford 49% 879 00:49:19,520 --> 00:49:23,180 S1: of independents think Trump should drop out because of his 880 00:49:23,180 --> 00:49:26,480 S1: guilty verdict. I'm making a prediction. I think this effect 881 00:49:26,480 --> 00:49:29,180 S1: wears off and Trump will be pulling even with Biden 882 00:49:29,180 --> 00:49:31,040 S1: within a month. You know what I'm going to do? 883 00:49:31,040 --> 00:49:36,910 S1: Let's go look at 538 538 polls. Wow. Look at 884 00:49:36,910 --> 00:49:41,529 S1: the impact. Look at the impact of the guilty verdict. Yeah, 885 00:49:41,530 --> 00:49:45,640 S1: it happened right in here somewhere. Oh, look. No impact. 886 00:49:45,640 --> 00:49:48,549 S1: And maybe I'm reading this wrong. Maybe this doesn't account 887 00:49:48,550 --> 00:49:52,460 S1: for independence. I mean, this is this is a June 888 00:49:52,460 --> 00:49:57,489 S1: 12th 10th through 12th result. Echelon insights. I don't know 889 00:49:57,489 --> 00:50:01,839 S1: how big this thing is. Okay, YouGov I know that's respectable. 890 00:50:01,840 --> 00:50:06,670 S1: Biden 40, Trump 42. Okay. We got two different echelon 891 00:50:06,670 --> 00:50:10,930 S1: ones daily cause what do we got? 4545 tide. So 892 00:50:10,930 --> 00:50:15,250 S1: so I read this article and it's like, yeah, 49% 893 00:50:15,250 --> 00:50:18,310 S1: of independents think Trump should drop out after his guilty verdict. 894 00:50:18,310 --> 00:50:22,480 S1: Are these polls okay? That's one argument. Independents don't respond 895 00:50:22,480 --> 00:50:25,569 S1: to polls. And supposedly these independents are going to switch 896 00:50:25,570 --> 00:50:28,060 S1: the thing and they're going to be mad at Trump, 897 00:50:28,060 --> 00:50:30,730 S1: and it's going to go for Biden. I don't buy it. 898 00:50:30,940 --> 00:50:33,700 S1: If anything, in my opinion, this is just my opinion. 899 00:50:33,700 --> 00:50:37,600 S1: This is politics. Like, who knows anything, right? In my opinion, 900 00:50:37,600 --> 00:50:41,500 S1: these numbers are soft for Trump. I think Trump is 901 00:50:41,500 --> 00:50:44,380 S1: probably winning by another 5 or 10 points right now. 902 00:50:44,380 --> 00:50:48,730 S1: That's my guess. And I don't think him being convicted 903 00:50:48,730 --> 00:50:53,650 S1: is going to do anything for his numbers if if not, 904 00:50:53,650 --> 00:50:56,920 S1: make it better for him. Just ridiculous. This is why 905 00:50:56,920 --> 00:50:59,170 S1: I think about I. I literally do not look at 906 00:50:59,170 --> 00:51:03,520 S1: news anymore other other than like I brings me political 907 00:51:03,520 --> 00:51:06,009 S1: news and analyses for me and then I have to 908 00:51:06,010 --> 00:51:08,200 S1: go like read the story, I have to do my 909 00:51:08,200 --> 00:51:10,990 S1: analysis or whatever. But like I do not pay attention 910 00:51:10,989 --> 00:51:13,629 S1: to this stuff. I'm trying to build human 3.0 I 911 00:51:13,630 --> 00:51:17,080 S1: don't like. I'm just so disillusioned with everything. I'm just 912 00:51:17,080 --> 00:51:20,380 S1: like checked out. All right, X is doing adult content. 913 00:51:20,380 --> 00:51:24,009 S1: Good for them. Ernest Hemingway wrote a deeply moving letter 914 00:51:24,010 --> 00:51:27,460 S1: to friends who lost their son, saying, those who truly 915 00:51:27,460 --> 00:51:34,750 S1: live never really die. I love Maria Popova. The marginalien. Yeah, 916 00:51:34,750 --> 00:51:36,640 S1: I liked the old name that she had for that 917 00:51:36,640 --> 00:51:40,390 S1: site before. I can't remember what it was. The yellow site. Anyway, 918 00:51:40,390 --> 00:51:42,880 S1: one of the coolest life wisdom reads I've come across 919 00:51:42,880 --> 00:51:44,680 S1: in a while. This is a really cool one. I'll 920 00:51:44,680 --> 00:51:47,319 S1: put this one up. You can never expect honesty from 921 00:51:47,320 --> 00:51:50,230 S1: people who even lie to themselves. You'll be ten times 922 00:51:50,230 --> 00:51:52,600 S1: happier if you forgive your parents and stop blaming them 923 00:51:52,600 --> 00:51:56,230 S1: for your misery for yourself. From society's advice, most of 924 00:51:56,230 --> 00:51:58,510 S1: them have no idea of what they're doing. If you 925 00:51:58,510 --> 00:52:01,660 S1: continue to wait for the right time, you'll waste your 926 00:52:01,660 --> 00:52:04,540 S1: entire life and nothing will ever happen. It's a massive 927 00:52:04,540 --> 00:52:07,870 S1: list of these. They're quite, quite good. You'll lose 99% 928 00:52:07,870 --> 00:52:10,779 S1: of your close friends when you start to improve your life. 929 00:52:10,780 --> 00:52:14,020 S1: That's bleak. I wouldn't go with 99%, but I get 930 00:52:14,020 --> 00:52:17,920 S1: the point. You don't need 100 self-help books. All you 931 00:52:17,920 --> 00:52:21,280 S1: need is action and self-discipline. It's a great list. It's 932 00:52:21,280 --> 00:52:23,710 S1: a great list. You should check it out. Ideas and 933 00:52:23,710 --> 00:52:27,940 S1: analysis I think I figured out the simplest possible answer 934 00:52:27,940 --> 00:52:31,660 S1: for why Trump is still doing so well. Oh my god, 935 00:52:31,660 --> 00:52:35,230 S1: I didn't include the link. Oh man, I didn't include 936 00:52:35,230 --> 00:52:38,169 S1: the link in here. It's like, oh really? You did great. 937 00:52:38,170 --> 00:52:40,870 S1: Thanks for not sharing it. And recommendation for the week 938 00:52:40,870 --> 00:52:44,650 S1: is Tyler Cowen and Aakash Patel. As I talked about 939 00:52:44,650 --> 00:52:47,109 S1: in the aphorism of the week, live as if you 940 00:52:47,110 --> 00:52:49,810 S1: were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to 941 00:52:49,810 --> 00:52:52,960 S1: live forever. Live as if you were to die tomorrow. 942 00:52:52,960 --> 00:52:56,589 S1: Learn as if you were to live forever. Mahatma Gandhi. 943 00:52:57,719 --> 00:53:00,839 S1: Unsupervised Learning is produced and edited by Daniel Meisler on 944 00:53:00,840 --> 00:53:05,460 S1: a Neumann U87 AI microphone using Hindenburg. Intro and outro 945 00:53:05,460 --> 00:53:08,790 S1: music is by zombie with the why and to get 946 00:53:08,790 --> 00:53:10,859 S1: the text and links from this episode, sign up for 947 00:53:10,860 --> 00:53:16,509 S1: the newsletter version of the show at Daniel meisler.com/newsletter. We'll 948 00:53:16,510 --> 00:53:17,350 S1: see you next time.