WEBVTT - UL NO. 451: Altman Says ASI in "Thousands of Days"

0:00:01.129 --> 0:00:04.460
<v S1>Welcome to Unsupervised Learning, a security, AI and meaning focused

0:00:04.460 --> 0:00:07.310
<v S1>podcast that looks at how best to thrive as humans

0:00:07.310 --> 0:00:11.540
<v S1>in a post AI world. It combines original ideas, analysis,

0:00:11.570 --> 0:00:14.780
<v S1>and mental models to bring not just the news, but

0:00:14.780 --> 0:00:22.400
<v S1>why it matters and how to respond. All right, welcome

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:25.130
<v S1>to unsupervised learning. This is Daniel Miessler. Okay. First big

0:00:25.130 --> 0:00:30.860
<v S1>news that just happened is there was a release for Gemini.

0:00:30.890 --> 0:00:34.700
<v S1>So there was rumor last night or, I don't know,

0:00:34.729 --> 0:00:36.980
<v S1>last few days that there was going to be a

0:00:36.979 --> 0:00:39.830
<v S1>big model that got released. And it turns out it

0:00:39.830 --> 0:00:43.460
<v S1>was Google as opposed to anthropic, although maybe anthropic is

0:00:43.490 --> 0:00:45.200
<v S1>going to do something as well. I was hoping for

0:00:45.229 --> 0:00:47.839
<v S1>like an opus four or something, or at least an

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:51.229
<v S1>opus 3.5. So it turns out to have been Google

0:00:51.229 --> 0:00:55.790
<v S1>and it looks like new Gemini 1.5 Pro and Flash models.

0:00:55.790 --> 0:00:59.990
<v S1>So right off the bat, I mean, these seem very minor.

0:01:00.020 --> 0:01:04.339
<v S1>They're minor updates to 1.5 Pro, but whatever. I'm looking

0:01:04.340 --> 0:01:10.069
<v S1>for reasons to be excited. 52% reduction in output token pricing,

0:01:10.100 --> 0:01:16.760
<v S1>two times higher rate limits for Gemini 1.5 flash and

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:20.720
<v S1>three times higher rate limits for Gemini 1.5 Pro. So

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:24.050
<v S1>these are really updates to 1.5 Pro. And if I

0:01:24.050 --> 0:01:27.500
<v S1>go to let's see here, if I go to Kitty

0:01:27.500 --> 0:01:32.120
<v S1>and I do this yeah I'm not seeing 002. Oh

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:35.300
<v S1>there we go. Yeah 20. Okay. So if I put

0:01:35.330 --> 0:01:40.370
<v S1>20in here into fabric I'm now using Gemini 1.5 Pro

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.100
<v S1>version two, which is the brand new one that just

0:01:43.100 --> 0:01:46.880
<v S1>came out. So I guess we could do like a classic. Um,

0:01:46.910 --> 0:01:51.740
<v S1>so this is the rivets video pipe to fabric SP

0:01:52.670 --> 0:01:58.340
<v S1>extract wisdom DM all right, so streaming works. Seems pretty fast.

0:01:58.350 --> 0:02:01.020
<v S1>See how these insights are? So first of all, it

0:02:01.050 --> 0:02:04.500
<v S1>extracted a whole lot of insights. That's or no that

0:02:04.500 --> 0:02:08.400
<v S1>was ideas. Now insights should be fewer. And these look

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:10.770
<v S1>really really good. So here's one thing that I love

0:02:10.770 --> 0:02:13.980
<v S1>about AI right now. So if I give this same

0:02:13.980 --> 0:02:19.110
<v S1>challenge to Gemini and GPT four or any of the

0:02:19.110 --> 0:02:23.520
<v S1>modern ones from OpenAI or anthropic, they all come up

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:26.370
<v S1>with this one as the top quote. You can't necessarily

0:02:26.370 --> 0:02:28.620
<v S1>think yourself into the answers. You have to create space

0:02:28.620 --> 0:02:30.840
<v S1>for the answers to come to you. And I think

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:33.450
<v S1>that is really, really cool. And all these other quotes

0:02:33.450 --> 0:02:35.609
<v S1>are just fantastic. This is like one of the videos

0:02:35.610 --> 0:02:37.350
<v S1>I know the best. It's like one of my favorite

0:02:37.350 --> 0:02:42.120
<v S1>videos ever. So anyway, this is the results of the

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:47.280
<v S1>capture from 1.500002, which is the brand new one. And

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:49.830
<v S1>let's look at the habits. First of all, it followed

0:02:49.830 --> 0:02:52.769
<v S1>instructions really well. And by the way, the DM version

0:02:52.770 --> 0:02:55.860
<v S1>of Extract Wisdom has a whole bunch of extra instructions.

0:02:55.889 --> 0:02:59.460
<v S1>It's like way more chain of thought and way more

0:02:59.460 --> 0:03:02.460
<v S1>prescriptive for like what I'm looking for. So that should

0:03:02.460 --> 0:03:07.079
<v S1>give a pretty good advantage. And it looks like Google

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:10.020
<v S1>did really well with it. I like the way that

0:03:10.020 --> 0:03:12.180
<v S1>they're saying this. Oh, you know what I want to

0:03:12.180 --> 0:03:15.060
<v S1>do my other new favourite one. So let's take that

0:03:15.060 --> 0:03:20.460
<v S1>one and let's do create story explanation I love this

0:03:20.460 --> 0:03:25.530
<v S1>create story explanation one. Absolutely fantastic. So it basically just

0:03:25.530 --> 0:03:29.100
<v S1>walks you through like you're in a conversation about whatever

0:03:29.100 --> 0:03:32.579
<v S1>the input is. So they lament the decline of creativity

0:03:32.580 --> 0:03:35.430
<v S1>and deep thought. In the West. They discuss the impact

0:03:35.430 --> 0:03:39.180
<v S1>of technology, social media and constant barrage of information. One

0:03:39.180 --> 0:03:41.760
<v S1>speaker shares her experience of deep diving into the history

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:45.450
<v S1>of the New Testament manuscripts. They discuss the importance of

0:03:45.450 --> 0:03:51.089
<v S1>deep reading, embracing diverse interests. So yeah, the conversation concludes

0:03:51.090 --> 0:03:53.790
<v S1>with a powerful image of the decline of the creative spirit.

0:03:53.820 --> 0:03:56.500
<v S1>I mean, this is just a cool way of describing

0:03:56.500 --> 0:03:58.930
<v S1>a piece of content. So I think I could do

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:01.960
<v S1>like another one. Neri Oxman so this is one of

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.570
<v S1>my other favorite YouTube videos ever. Yeah, look at this.

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:08.559
<v S1>Oxman believes nature possesses a wisdom beyond human intelligence. She's

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:13.360
<v S1>building a company called Oxman to explore the wisdom and

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:16.690
<v S1>augment nature with technology. Her goal is to grow products,

0:04:16.690 --> 0:04:19.539
<v S1>blurring the line between made and grown. See? Check this

0:04:19.540 --> 0:04:23.230
<v S1>out when I go to summarize why I love this

0:04:23.230 --> 0:04:25.510
<v S1>video so much, it's hard to capture it. It's hard

0:04:25.510 --> 0:04:29.110
<v S1>to remember what I love about it so much, and

0:04:29.110 --> 0:04:32.620
<v S1>this does really well at that. The tech does really

0:04:32.620 --> 0:04:35.860
<v S1>well at capturing what makes her so awesome and it's

0:04:35.860 --> 0:04:39.070
<v S1>got advice. It's just like great. In fact, I might

0:04:39.070 --> 0:04:42.520
<v S1>even get rid of this pre and post sentence. I

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.609
<v S1>think I might just keep that content right there. But

0:04:45.610 --> 0:04:49.240
<v S1>I'm not going to do that live. But anyway. Yeah interesting.

0:04:49.270 --> 0:04:51.010
<v S1>Looks like I have a little bit of a key showing.

0:04:51.010 --> 0:04:53.650
<v S1>But that is not a real key. That is a

0:04:53.650 --> 0:04:58.900
<v S1>HTTP Cookie header. Always like to watch my OpSec here.

0:04:58.930 --> 0:05:00.760
<v S1>Going to leave a token at some point. I'm going

0:05:00.790 --> 0:05:02.979
<v S1>to leave a token to see if I'm going to

0:05:02.980 --> 0:05:06.789
<v S1>leave an API key out there and and monitor to

0:05:06.820 --> 0:05:10.930
<v S1>see if anyone comes in on it. Exercise for the reader. Okay.

0:05:10.930 --> 0:05:14.650
<v S1>So cool. So yeah, we don't have the video of

0:05:14.650 --> 0:05:17.080
<v S1>Parul and Sam Altman yet. It looks like he has

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:20.229
<v S1>not dropped it yet, but that's fine. Just go back

0:05:20.230 --> 0:05:24.760
<v S1>to the show. Basically some model upgrades from Gemini and

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:27.609
<v S1>they look to work quite nicely. And I just changed

0:05:27.610 --> 0:05:30.910
<v S1>my default model to it just now. So I'll see

0:05:30.910 --> 0:05:37.390
<v S1>how that does performance wise. Okay. Um, Thomas Rocca created

0:05:37.390 --> 0:05:40.299
<v S1>a web GUI for fabric called fabric UI. Check this

0:05:40.300 --> 0:05:44.770
<v S1>thing out. Look at that. And Jonathan, who's on the

0:05:44.770 --> 0:05:47.650
<v S1>fabric team, is actually working on something like this as well.

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:49.420
<v S1>But look at this. You can select the model. You

0:05:49.420 --> 0:05:51.730
<v S1>want to use a pretty good selection there. You put

0:05:51.730 --> 0:05:53.870
<v S1>it in your API key. The guy's a hard core

0:05:53.870 --> 0:05:55.790
<v S1>security guy, so I don't think he's going to be

0:05:55.790 --> 0:05:59.030
<v S1>stealing keys anytime soon. Um, and then, look, you pick

0:05:59.029 --> 0:06:02.570
<v S1>your pattern here, and. Yeah, you got a guy to

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:07.340
<v S1>run fabric with. And again, Jonathan on the fabric team

0:06:07.339 --> 0:06:10.220
<v S1>is actually building something similar. He's building like an API

0:06:10.250 --> 0:06:14.270
<v S1>server and also guy. So that's going to be really cool.

0:06:14.420 --> 0:06:19.820
<v S1>But this guy, uh, Thomas Rocha. Super cool guy. I've

0:06:19.820 --> 0:06:22.400
<v S1>known him for years and years. Uh, he's part of

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:25.940
<v S1>the UL community and, uh, evidently just built a UI

0:06:25.970 --> 0:06:28.400
<v S1>for fabric. So that was very cool. And I just

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:30.560
<v S1>spent a whole bunch of time, like, deep cleaning on

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:34.729
<v S1>my phone, which is the new iPhone 16 Pro and deleted,

0:06:34.730 --> 0:06:40.489
<v S1>probably 40 applications, phone screen cleanup, widgets, Refactors watch faces.

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:43.849
<v S1>I redid all my focus modes, which are these things

0:06:43.850 --> 0:06:47.330
<v S1>up here and uh, like right here. So you got

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.150
<v S1>like work and personal and Do Not Disturb and all that.

0:06:50.150 --> 0:06:52.880
<v S1>And all of those have individual settings which map over

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:55.789
<v S1>to the phone as well. So it's like it's basically

0:06:55.790 --> 0:07:00.919
<v S1>a giant ecosystem upgrade, like computing ecosystem upgrade within the

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:04.159
<v S1>Apple ecosystem. And I do that every year, but sometimes

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:06.200
<v S1>I only do a very little. And like the last

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:08.120
<v S1>couple years, I've only done a little bit of it,

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:11.120
<v S1>and I probably spent 5 or 6 hours this year

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:13.610
<v S1>doing a massive cleanup. And the reason I mention it

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.880
<v S1>is because it feels really good to do that. You've

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:21.470
<v S1>probably been feeling weight weighing on you of like, oh man,

0:07:21.470 --> 0:07:23.990
<v S1>these apps are nasty. Why do I have these? Do

0:07:23.990 --> 0:07:27.260
<v S1>I have subscriptions that are still turned on? So all

0:07:27.290 --> 0:07:29.960
<v S1>that to say, I encourage you to go do a cleanup.

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:33.110
<v S1>It will feel good. Okay, so I did an analysis

0:07:33.110 --> 0:07:38.600
<v S1>of OpenAI's long form conversation with the zero one strawberry team.

0:07:38.780 --> 0:07:40.550
<v S1>So this is the conversation.

0:07:40.580 --> 0:07:43.730
<v S2>And I think, you know, for go players and chess

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:45.530
<v S2>players that would have come if you go to.

0:07:45.530 --> 0:07:47.750
<v S1>The beginning, you see I lead the research team here

0:07:47.750 --> 0:07:50.240
<v S1>at OpenAI. Look, if you see here zero one mini,

0:07:50.270 --> 0:07:52.910
<v S1>as I click through, it's like, look at that.

0:07:53.450 --> 0:07:56.390
<v S2>Shot of before there was the first, there was a

0:07:56.390 --> 0:07:58.369
<v S2>whole bunch of we started talking to the model and

0:07:58.370 --> 0:08:00.740
<v S2>people were like, wow, this is going to be doing

0:08:00.740 --> 0:08:03.740
<v S2>something like that. And I think there was a certain

0:08:03.740 --> 0:08:05.270
<v S2>moment in our in our training.

0:08:05.270 --> 0:08:07.550
<v S1>Use it. Why? It's better than other things.

0:08:07.550 --> 0:08:10.670
<v S2>Put more computers in our area than before of GPT

0:08:10.700 --> 0:08:14.810
<v S2>four trained, first of all generating a long form conversation.

0:08:14.930 --> 0:08:16.250
<v S2>And wow, this looks.

0:08:16.250 --> 0:08:16.910
<v S1>Like fairly long.

0:08:16.940 --> 0:08:19.429
<v S2>Very different than before 32nd. For me, this is the

0:08:19.430 --> 0:08:20.420
<v S2>moment for.

0:08:20.420 --> 0:08:25.040
<v S1>So if we, um, take the video URL and we

0:08:25.070 --> 0:08:28.640
<v S1>come back here, uh, by the way, you don't have

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:31.790
<v S1>to use it anymore. You see what I'm doing here?

0:08:31.790 --> 0:08:36.079
<v S1>This video is being parsed by fabric itself with the

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:40.370
<v S1>Y parameter for YouTube. Okay. So if I do that

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:45.110
<v S1>I'm going to get back the transcript like that. Um,

0:08:45.110 --> 0:08:48.560
<v S1>so if I do yeah. Let's do let's do create

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.560
<v S1>story explanation again. And again. This is using the Pro

0:08:51.590 --> 0:08:54.950
<v S1>model from Gemini. It feels a little strange summarizing an

0:08:54.950 --> 0:08:59.150
<v S1>OpenAI video with Gemini, but whatever. It's not that deep. Okay, yeah,

0:08:59.150 --> 0:09:01.069
<v S1>they've been working on this for a long time. It's

0:09:01.070 --> 0:09:05.360
<v S1>a reasoning model, meaning it takes time to think before answering.

0:09:05.390 --> 0:09:08.900
<v S1>The team had several aha moments, like, I feel like

0:09:08.929 --> 0:09:13.250
<v S1>you could just read these ten bullets and have a conversational,

0:09:13.250 --> 0:09:18.110
<v S1>explanatory explanation of what's in this video. And that's why

0:09:18.110 --> 0:09:21.890
<v S1>I created this pattern called Create Story Explanation. It's just

0:09:21.890 --> 0:09:25.130
<v S1>a way of explaining anything in a super approachable way,

0:09:25.130 --> 0:09:29.329
<v S1>including like the most crazy, crazy. Okay, I'm going to

0:09:29.330 --> 0:09:33.560
<v S1>do particle physics, so let's do string theory. Look at this.

0:09:33.590 --> 0:09:36.469
<v S1>Imagine everything in the universe not made of little balls,

0:09:36.470 --> 0:09:40.190
<v S1>but tiny vibrating strings. They vibrate at different frequencies, and

0:09:40.190 --> 0:09:43.819
<v S1>those frequencies determine what kind of particle it appears to be.

0:09:43.970 --> 0:09:47.330
<v S1>Look at this. That's clean. That is so clean. And

0:09:47.330 --> 0:09:50.910
<v S1>it's different than then extract wisdom, which I don't even

0:09:50.910 --> 0:09:54.840
<v S1>know what that would do. Yeah, that. I'm curious. Take

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:58.560
<v S1>all of string theory, basically that the model knows about

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:02.220
<v S1>and send that to extract wisdom. I very curious what

0:10:02.220 --> 0:10:05.220
<v S1>this is going to do. Ideas? Holy crap. It is

0:10:05.220 --> 0:10:08.939
<v S1>extracting all the ideas out of string theory insights. Okay,

0:10:08.970 --> 0:10:15.360
<v S1>it's doing actual insights. Yeah. Quotes. Nothing. Facts. Nothing. Habits. Nothing. Recommendations. Nice. Okay,

0:10:15.390 --> 0:10:17.699
<v S1>I'm pretty happy with this, actually. See what we get

0:10:17.700 --> 0:10:21.960
<v S1>from the insights potential unified framework for understanding all fundamental

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:26.400
<v S1>forces and particles. Well, yeah, that's that's why string theory

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:29.940
<v S1>was exciting and or is still exciting. Not sure if

0:10:29.940 --> 0:10:32.910
<v S1>it actually still is. Extra dimensions. A key element of

0:10:32.910 --> 0:10:36.420
<v S1>string theory could reshape our understanding of the universe. See,

0:10:36.450 --> 0:10:41.880
<v S1>this is really cool, right? Look at this. Look at ideas. Insights.

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:45.840
<v S1>This is really cool and powerful, but it's not as

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.160
<v S1>cool as this. If you're trying to explain it to

0:10:48.190 --> 0:10:52.480
<v S1>just a regular person or or heck to me on

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:55.630
<v S1>any given day, I would like to hear it this way.

0:10:55.630 --> 0:10:57.820
<v S1>And then if I really want to go deep on it,

0:10:57.820 --> 0:11:01.270
<v S1>like then maybe extract wisdom to pull this stuff out

0:11:01.270 --> 0:11:05.380
<v S1>and definitely extract wisdom if I want to extract, you know,

0:11:05.410 --> 0:11:08.350
<v S1>purely the ideas or whatever, which I actually have separate

0:11:08.350 --> 0:11:11.830
<v S1>patterns for those. But anyway, bottom line, the reason I

0:11:11.830 --> 0:11:15.370
<v S1>got on to this is that I did an extraction

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:19.510
<v S1>of the techniques that were that they said they were

0:11:19.510 --> 0:11:23.050
<v S1>using the zero one model from in this interview, they

0:11:23.050 --> 0:11:25.929
<v S1>said we here's what we love doing. And they went

0:11:25.929 --> 0:11:27.910
<v S1>around the room to all those different people and it

0:11:27.910 --> 0:11:31.449
<v S1>was like, hey, what? What do you do? What what

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:33.820
<v S1>have you found that oh, one can do that GPT

0:11:33.850 --> 0:11:37.180
<v S1>four can't. And so they came up with this list.

0:11:37.179 --> 0:11:42.819
<v S1>Generate code part pass error messages for debugging. Learn complex

0:11:42.820 --> 0:11:51.420
<v S1>technical subjects asking it to explain concepts without hallucinations. Brainstorm solutions. Okay. Um, okay.

0:11:51.450 --> 0:11:55.080
<v S1>So I think this might be my Twitter post about it. Yeah. Yeah.

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:57.329
<v S1>So I did a thread here. I'll just walk through

0:11:57.330 --> 0:12:00.089
<v S1>these real quick. So some thoughts. A lot of these

0:12:00.090 --> 0:12:04.200
<v S1>takeaways are similar to GPT four sonnet that can already do.

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:07.830
<v S1>But the main theme is simply asking more of the

0:12:07.830 --> 0:12:11.309
<v S1>model and expecting more out of it. And another key

0:12:11.309 --> 0:12:15.479
<v S1>thing seems to be idea generation brainstorming creativity. So it's

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:18.450
<v S1>more like a creative partner. Oh, one is rather than

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:21.660
<v S1>previous models. So that was one thing they were really

0:12:21.660 --> 0:12:24.720
<v S1>excited about. One of the ones was I loved the

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:28.080
<v S1>bit about asking to connect ideas. So if we go

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.559
<v S1>back to this list, look at this, um, ask oh

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:37.199
<v S1>one deep questions about abstract concepts to receive thoughtful, detailed answers. Um,

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:40.559
<v S1>implement projects with little prior knowledge. Oh, here we go.

0:12:40.590 --> 0:12:44.970
<v S1>Organize unstructured thoughts by asking oh, one to connect ideas

0:12:44.970 --> 0:12:49.660
<v S1>and identify missing elements. That is cool. I'll just open

0:12:49.660 --> 0:12:55.150
<v S1>this up, make text more creative by requesting multiple alternative ideas.

0:12:55.150 --> 0:12:58.120
<v S1>So again, all of these are very thinking based and

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:01.810
<v S1>very creativity based. I generate ideas for structure and content

0:13:01.809 --> 0:13:06.429
<v S1>of writing. Yeah, really really cool stuff. So that's what

0:13:06.429 --> 0:13:09.400
<v S1>that was about. Um, yeah. And it's in the newsletter,

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:11.440
<v S1>so you can go check it out. All right. Wrote

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:16.120
<v S1>a piece for AT&amp;T business about AI transforming real time monitoring.

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:20.890
<v S1>So this is basically a security post about many AIS. And, uh, yeah,

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.319
<v S1>I think you'll like it. It's, uh, a piece I've

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:24.910
<v S1>been thinking about, so I was happy to do it

0:13:24.910 --> 0:13:29.410
<v S1>for AT&amp;T business. Who, uh, who sponsored the piece. So

0:13:29.410 --> 0:13:32.949
<v S1>I'm excited to be a keynote speaker at Swiss Cyberstorm,

0:13:32.950 --> 0:13:36.250
<v S1>which is a really, really cool, uh, security conference. I've

0:13:36.250 --> 0:13:39.400
<v S1>been reading more about it. They're not about, like, all

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:42.160
<v S1>the latest hacks and like, oh, we we hacked this thing.

0:13:42.190 --> 0:13:43.839
<v S1>Let me show you how we can break into this

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.390
<v S1>thing or whatever, which again, I've done a million of

0:13:46.390 --> 0:13:49.089
<v S1>those talks. I'm all for them. At this stage of

0:13:49.090 --> 0:13:51.520
<v S1>my career, though, it's like I'm not finding that as

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:55.240
<v S1>interesting just because I feel like it's too easy to

0:13:55.270 --> 0:13:58.030
<v S1>hack things. There are lots of kids standing at the

0:13:58.030 --> 0:14:00.400
<v S1>top of a stairway, and it's like, easy to walk

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:02.620
<v S1>by and push them. Why would you want to walk

0:14:02.620 --> 0:14:06.850
<v S1>by and push them? The whole world is super fragile.

0:14:06.850 --> 0:14:10.809
<v S1>It's a surprise that any of this works like I just.

0:14:10.809 --> 0:14:13.060
<v S1>I'm not getting the same enjoyment that I used to

0:14:13.059 --> 0:14:18.070
<v S1>get from breaking into things or knocking something over, you

0:14:18.070 --> 0:14:20.110
<v S1>know what I mean? It's like it doesn't give me

0:14:20.110 --> 0:14:22.420
<v S1>a good feeling. So the thing that's giving me a

0:14:22.420 --> 0:14:25.510
<v S1>good feeling now is building and trying to figure out

0:14:25.510 --> 0:14:29.800
<v S1>what the most difficult problems are in the world. Um, anyway,

0:14:30.070 --> 0:14:33.880
<v S1>bottom line for this thing, this conference here keep going

0:14:33.910 --> 0:14:37.840
<v S1>on tangents. Um, this conference focuses on that. It focuses

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:41.080
<v S1>on the ideas around security as opposed to like the

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:45.290
<v S1>latest hacking thing. And I like a mix of both, honestly.

0:14:45.290 --> 0:14:48.500
<v S1>But I prefer more the the thoughts and the trends

0:14:48.500 --> 0:14:51.800
<v S1>and stuff like that of like, where is this going?

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.530
<v S1>Are we moving to a place where there's no trust?

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:58.700
<v S1>How does all security change when there's no trust? What

0:14:58.730 --> 0:15:01.340
<v S1>sorts of infrastructure are we going to need in that world?

0:15:01.340 --> 0:15:03.740
<v S1>That kind of thing. And you could use code unsupervised

0:15:03.740 --> 0:15:09.110
<v S1>learning for 15% off for your registration. And the theme

0:15:09.110 --> 0:15:14.600
<v S1>for this one is AI Revolution. So yeah. Cyberstorm Swiss Cyberstorm.

0:15:14.630 --> 0:15:17.930
<v S1>All right. Security Israel launched an extraordinary attack on Hezbollah

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:21.500
<v S1>using a combination of supply chain and remote triggering techniques.

0:15:21.500 --> 0:15:23.900
<v S1>And I've got a whole bunch here. You know, I

0:15:23.900 --> 0:15:26.180
<v S1>don't think I'm going to go into this. It's it's

0:15:26.180 --> 0:15:30.080
<v S1>political and it's a bit long and we're already like

0:15:30.110 --> 0:15:32.300
<v S1>pretty far into this podcast. So I think I'm going

0:15:32.330 --> 0:15:34.760
<v S1>to let you go and read that one security researcher

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:39.890
<v S1>named X, y, z three VA found a catastrophic flaw

0:15:39.890 --> 0:15:43.850
<v S1>in the Arc browser That lets attackers inject arbitrary code

0:15:43.850 --> 0:15:48.290
<v S1>into user sessions using just a user ID. That is,

0:15:48.530 --> 0:15:53.210
<v S1>that is nasty. So presumably I haven't looked deeply at

0:15:53.210 --> 0:15:56.960
<v S1>this one, but it's like presumably each user has some

0:15:56.960 --> 0:16:00.859
<v S1>sort of guide. And then there's infrastructure that controls like

0:16:00.860 --> 0:16:03.680
<v S1>the guides. And then if you attack that infrastructure, you're

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:07.370
<v S1>now attacking the user who's using the browser if they're

0:16:07.370 --> 0:16:11.990
<v S1>in as that guide. That is just so gross. So gross.

0:16:12.020 --> 0:16:19.190
<v S1>All right. Hacker named Adkar 72 424 has leaked a

0:16:19.190 --> 0:16:23.600
<v S1>massive database of 3.3 billion unique email addresses or claiming

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.720
<v S1>they're unique. And he said, yeah, it's not dupes. It's

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:32.510
<v S1>not old stuff. It's a new captcha. And evidently it's 21.8GB.

0:16:32.540 --> 0:16:36.590
<v S1>We're thinking about putting this into Suckless, but that's pretty huge.

0:16:36.590 --> 0:16:41.000
<v S1>Suckless is already massive as it is. Chinese scientists have

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.880
<v S1>figured out how to use Starlink satellites to detect stealth

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:49.520
<v S1>aircraft and drones, which are designed to dodge radar. Presumably,

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:54.380
<v S1>they're basically it's background radiation coming from the satellites. And

0:16:54.380 --> 0:16:58.220
<v S1>if you look up and you detect the satellite radiation,

0:16:58.370 --> 0:17:01.760
<v S1>the signals coming from the satellites, and you see things missing,

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:05.330
<v S1>you see little cutouts. Well, that's where the thing is.

0:17:05.330 --> 0:17:08.480
<v S1>That's my guess. Either that or there's bounce off the

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:12.740
<v S1>thing that produces like interference, and they're detecting that interference.

0:17:12.740 --> 0:17:15.320
<v S1>I'm betting it's one of those two things. Thanks to

0:17:15.350 --> 0:17:21.680
<v S1>Nudge Security for sponsoring nuclei templates. Version ten is out,

0:17:21.710 --> 0:17:25.340
<v S1>including new Azure Config stuff. Google is making it easier

0:17:25.340 --> 0:17:29.390
<v S1>to use Passkeys by syncing them automatically via Google Password

0:17:29.390 --> 0:17:34.160
<v S1>and across Chrome on windows, Mac and Linux and Android

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:37.460
<v S1>and iOS. Support is coming soon. Greynoise has been tracking

0:17:37.460 --> 0:17:43.109
<v S1>mysterious noise Storms of spoofed internet traffic since January of 2020,

0:17:43.109 --> 0:17:46.590
<v S1>but still remains unknown. They're still trying to figure it out,

0:17:46.619 --> 0:17:51.540
<v S1>but it includes this love Ascii string in ICMP, and

0:17:51.540 --> 0:17:55.290
<v S1>they might be like covert communications or DDoS coordination. Kind

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:57.930
<v S1>of interesting. That's a man that reminds me of like

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:01.260
<v S1>old school, like ham radio stuff or CB radio where

0:18:01.290 --> 0:18:04.560
<v S1>like you, you hear this signal and it sounds like

0:18:04.590 --> 0:18:07.020
<v S1>a pulse or something, and then you research and you

0:18:07.020 --> 0:18:10.440
<v S1>find out it's like some Russian submarine somewhere, or some

0:18:10.470 --> 0:18:14.340
<v S1>like Siberian radio station. But there's all this digging and

0:18:14.340 --> 0:18:16.830
<v S1>this is like pre-internet. So it's like really hard to

0:18:16.859 --> 0:18:20.520
<v S1>find information. Then you find out, oh, Jim. Oh, you

0:18:20.550 --> 0:18:22.770
<v S1>got to talk to Jim. Jim knows about this. He's

0:18:22.770 --> 0:18:26.040
<v S1>in whatever Saskatchewan, Idaho. And you talk to Jim and

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:28.409
<v S1>he's like, oh yeah, well, there's this one time. I

0:18:28.410 --> 0:18:32.850
<v S1>love that idea of like digging up archaic knowledge. And

0:18:32.850 --> 0:18:36.180
<v S1>I find this really interesting where it's like, Greynoise has

0:18:36.180 --> 0:18:39.179
<v S1>a bunch of sensors and they're seeing this love Ascii

0:18:39.210 --> 0:18:42.630
<v S1>thing and they're like, what is this? We've been tracking

0:18:42.630 --> 0:18:46.649
<v S1>it since, you know, January 2020. We don't know what

0:18:46.650 --> 0:18:48.000
<v S1>it is. We're trying to figure it out. I think

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:51.090
<v S1>that's cool. And thanks to Threatlocker for sponsoring the podcast.

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:53.910
<v S1>All right, AI tech. So Sam Altman just dropped an

0:18:53.910 --> 0:18:56.220
<v S1>essay called The Intelligence Age. I'm going to pull this

0:18:56.220 --> 0:18:58.260
<v S1>thing up. We're not going to read it. But first

0:18:58.260 --> 0:19:02.220
<v S1>of all, interesting website. I mean, it's just like super

0:19:02.250 --> 0:19:05.280
<v S1>got this piece of art, which is no doubt AI art,

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:07.859
<v S1>I'm guessing probably a doll image. Who knows, maybe he

0:19:07.859 --> 0:19:10.890
<v S1>made it, but it's like this super basic website. It's

0:19:10.890 --> 0:19:15.780
<v S1>got a date. It's IoT. Sam Altman. Com and essentially

0:19:15.780 --> 0:19:18.119
<v S1>what he does. Well, actually, here's what we're going to do.

0:19:18.150 --> 0:19:21.660
<v S1>Watch this. See, I just did, uh, command a and

0:19:21.660 --> 0:19:23.970
<v S1>we're going to go back here and we're going to

0:19:23.970 --> 0:19:27.780
<v S1>do uh, we're going to paste that in. So I

0:19:27.780 --> 0:19:32.220
<v S1>did a create story explanation of the Sam Altman piece.

0:19:32.220 --> 0:19:36.389
<v S1>So here we go. Society's collective intelligence has always brought

0:19:36.390 --> 0:19:40.150
<v S1>us forward and I supercharges that. AI tools will help

0:19:40.150 --> 0:19:44.469
<v S1>us solve hard problems. Imagine personal AI teams of virtual

0:19:44.470 --> 0:19:48.760
<v S1>experts helping us create anything shared prosperity where everyone's life

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:52.090
<v S1>is better. Deep learning is the key. AI will become

0:19:52.090 --> 0:19:56.260
<v S1>increasingly capable. AI assistants will handle complex tasks like coordinating

0:19:56.260 --> 0:19:58.780
<v S1>medical care for us. It will help us create better

0:19:58.780 --> 0:20:02.920
<v S1>AI and accelerate scientific discovery. It's going to need a

0:20:02.950 --> 0:20:06.790
<v S1>lot of computing power and energy. There will be challenges.

0:20:06.790 --> 0:20:11.619
<v S1>The potential benefits are immense, similar to solving climate change

0:20:11.619 --> 0:20:15.760
<v S1>and even with job market shifts. AI will amplify our

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:19.510
<v S1>abilities and create new opportunities. So it's basically a rah

0:20:19.510 --> 0:20:22.660
<v S1>rah for AI, which is not surprising coming from somebody

0:20:22.660 --> 0:20:25.510
<v S1>running an AI company. But it was it was interesting.

0:20:25.510 --> 0:20:27.850
<v S1>It was a good read. And, uh, yeah, a good

0:20:27.850 --> 0:20:33.580
<v S1>summary there from Google. Gemini 1.5, Pro Dash 002 and

0:20:33.580 --> 0:20:38.440
<v S1>the create Story explanation pattern in fabric. South Korea's research

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:43.540
<v S1>institute has unveiled Deja Vu AI system that analyzes CCTV

0:20:43.540 --> 0:20:48.130
<v S1>footage to predict and potentially prevent crimes. Yep, basically every

0:20:48.130 --> 0:20:51.430
<v S1>sci fi ever preventing crimes. Like. I'm not saying this

0:20:51.430 --> 0:20:54.700
<v S1>is not possible, but I think just because it's possible

0:20:54.700 --> 0:20:57.130
<v S1>doesn't mean you should run full speed, you know, carrying

0:20:57.130 --> 0:21:00.790
<v S1>scissors towards that possibility. Look, a lot of good can

0:21:00.790 --> 0:21:03.640
<v S1>come from anything that's even starts out a little bad.

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:06.699
<v S1>And the opposite is absolutely true as well. Like if

0:21:06.700 --> 0:21:11.590
<v S1>somebody is an obvious, obvious criminal, they're walking like a criminal.

0:21:11.740 --> 0:21:13.510
<v S1>What does that mean to walk like a criminal? I

0:21:13.510 --> 0:21:16.840
<v S1>don't know, maybe it means like having a hoodie on

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:20.379
<v S1>and glancing suspiciously from side to side at three in

0:21:20.410 --> 0:21:24.670
<v S1>the morning while carrying a crowbar in a neighborhood full

0:21:24.670 --> 0:21:28.660
<v S1>of cars that get broken into at roughly 3 a.m.

0:21:28.660 --> 0:21:31.600
<v S1>with crowbars. Right? That would be an example of like

0:21:31.630 --> 0:21:35.650
<v S1>a high correlation where, like, you have little much less

0:21:35.650 --> 0:21:39.820
<v S1>chance of bias, much less chance of jumping to conclusions.

0:21:39.940 --> 0:21:43.449
<v S1>It's like yeah. Oh, and also they're limping on the

0:21:43.450 --> 0:21:46.300
<v S1>right side in this particular group. Like puts all the

0:21:46.300 --> 0:21:48.310
<v S1>loot in their right side or whatever. You know what

0:21:48.310 --> 0:21:50.020
<v S1>I mean? It's like the more you add up the

0:21:50.020 --> 0:21:55.060
<v S1>evidence or whatever from like actual data and not random

0:21:55.060 --> 0:21:58.510
<v S1>things of like matching the clothing or matching the skin

0:21:58.510 --> 0:22:03.159
<v S1>color or matching whatever, you know, human bias based thing,

0:22:03.190 --> 0:22:06.160
<v S1>wherever you can have as much data as possible and

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:11.290
<v S1>really good analysis and retroactively and currently look at it

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:14.800
<v S1>and evaluate it and make sure you're not being like,

0:22:14.830 --> 0:22:17.800
<v S1>biased in a, in a in a bad way. Sure.

0:22:17.830 --> 0:22:21.399
<v S1>The problem is that's not where it will stop, okay.

0:22:21.430 --> 0:22:24.340
<v S1>They will people will deploy that and it will be

0:22:24.340 --> 0:22:28.540
<v S1>cool and it will be useful to so-called predict crimes.

0:22:28.540 --> 0:22:31.000
<v S1>But the problem is they'll be like okay, cool. So

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:34.430
<v S1>let's open up that faucet. And now suddenly we're detecting

0:22:34.430 --> 0:22:37.430
<v S1>all people who look different in the neighborhood because they're

0:22:37.430 --> 0:22:40.370
<v S1>in the wrong neighborhood. Like, well, people who look like

0:22:40.369 --> 0:22:42.980
<v S1>that don't ever come into this place. And then unless

0:22:42.980 --> 0:22:45.980
<v S1>they're up to no good and some I could actually learn,

0:22:45.980 --> 0:22:48.410
<v S1>that doesn't mean the good ones will, but there's going

0:22:48.410 --> 0:22:51.740
<v S1>to be lots of bad and halfway bad eyes in

0:22:51.740 --> 0:22:54.859
<v S1>addition to the really, really good ones. So I think

0:22:54.859 --> 0:22:58.670
<v S1>any time you start predicting crimes and then affecting people's

0:22:58.670 --> 0:23:01.880
<v S1>lives as a result of those predictions, like that's sci

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:04.910
<v S1>fi shit and it's not a good thing. Johnny IV

0:23:04.940 --> 0:23:08.450
<v S1>has confirmed he's building a hardware AI device with OpenAI.

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:10.910
<v S1>This thing actually might crush the others. This is what

0:23:10.910 --> 0:23:13.790
<v S1>I was talking about, because the synergy between hardware, software

0:23:13.790 --> 0:23:17.419
<v S1>and aesthetics is really important in AI gadgets. Like something

0:23:17.420 --> 0:23:19.910
<v S1>you're going to have on you, something you're wearing, whatever.

0:23:19.940 --> 0:23:23.510
<v S1>Who gets that better than the, you know, British Apple guy?

0:23:23.540 --> 0:23:26.960
<v S1>Not many people. Blackrock and Microsoft are teaming up to

0:23:26.990 --> 0:23:32.730
<v S1>raise $30 billion for AI infrastructure, putting it into $100

0:23:32.730 --> 0:23:36.380
<v S1>billion in investments, hopefully. And they're building data centers and

0:23:36.380 --> 0:23:39.229
<v S1>energy projects primarily in the US. But this is a

0:23:39.230 --> 0:23:44.270
<v S1>partnership between Blackrock, Microsoft and the UAE to build data

0:23:44.300 --> 0:23:48.980
<v S1>centers and energy products projects in the US. Cool Canadian

0:23:48.980 --> 0:23:52.310
<v S1>study found an AI tool can reduce unexpected deaths in

0:23:52.310 --> 0:23:56.990
<v S1>hospitals by 26%. LinkedIn has quietly opted users into using

0:23:56.990 --> 0:23:59.869
<v S1>their data to trade generative AI models. I think they

0:23:59.869 --> 0:24:02.330
<v S1>might already be rolling this back because there was so

0:24:02.330 --> 0:24:05.120
<v S1>much backlash about it, and I think in the UK

0:24:05.150 --> 0:24:09.830
<v S1>they definitely said no. So I'm not sure how much

0:24:09.830 --> 0:24:13.310
<v S1>that's still continuing. But they tried. They tried and they

0:24:13.310 --> 0:24:15.650
<v S1>did the right thing by telling people and they freaked out.

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:21.650
<v S1>Recent study by ring rover. No ring over found that 76.5%.

0:24:21.650 --> 0:24:26.840
<v S1>So 77% of recruiters preferred AI generated headshots over real ones.

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:29.480
<v S1>Pardon the drinking there or edit it out. Okay, a

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:31.939
<v S1>lot of Amazon employees are upset about the requirement to

0:24:31.970 --> 0:24:34.400
<v S1>go back to five days in the office. Basically, people

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:38.000
<v S1>are freaking out. They're like, this is super lame. Whatever.

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:40.640
<v S1>I said my piece on that a million times. Sure,

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:43.700
<v S1>I'll say it again. Apple's iOS update has RCS support,

0:24:43.700 --> 0:24:46.399
<v S1>which means you're going to get to do more iPhone

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:53.840
<v S1>like things with Android users with green bubbles. So typing indications, emojis,

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:55.640
<v S1>stuff like that. It's all going to be a lot

0:24:55.640 --> 0:25:00.290
<v S1>more smooth now that you're on iOS 18. Apple's A16

0:25:00.290 --> 0:25:03.710
<v S1>mobile processors are being produced in the US at TSMC's

0:25:03.740 --> 0:25:09.950
<v S1>Arizona facility. Love this self-reliance American manufacturing push. Absolutely love it.

0:25:09.980 --> 0:25:14.870
<v S1>Apple's iPhone 16 now supports wireless firmware restoration. I'm guessing

0:25:14.869 --> 0:25:18.470
<v S1>Android has had this since like 2002. The Apple's Watch

0:25:18.500 --> 0:25:21.410
<v S1>Apple Watch's Remote app now lets you adjust volume with

0:25:21.410 --> 0:25:25.220
<v S1>Digital Crown, so it's basically like a better remote control

0:25:25.220 --> 0:25:28.460
<v S1>now for your Apple TV or whatever. And somebody shares

0:25:28.460 --> 0:25:33.030
<v S1>his journey of turning blog content into an e-book. Facundo Solano.

0:25:33.060 --> 0:25:37.890
<v S1>Turning blog content into an e-book. Humans Rick Beato argues

0:25:37.890 --> 0:25:40.979
<v S1>that music is getting worse because technology has made it

0:25:40.980 --> 0:25:44.220
<v S1>too easy to produce and consume. There's a new study

0:25:44.220 --> 0:25:47.610
<v S1>showing that omega three fatty fatty acids can help reduce

0:25:47.609 --> 0:25:51.119
<v S1>system symptoms of anxiety and depression in mice. So if

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:54.450
<v S1>you're a mouse, huge, huge news for you. US Department

0:25:54.450 --> 0:25:57.450
<v S1>of Energy is rolling out over $3 billion to fund

0:25:57.450 --> 0:26:01.710
<v S1>more than two dozen battery projects across 14 states. Love it,

0:26:01.740 --> 0:26:04.740
<v S1>love it, love it. Astronomers have discovered the largest black

0:26:04.740 --> 0:26:08.669
<v S1>hole jets ever observed. So basically, the black hole on

0:26:08.670 --> 0:26:12.270
<v S1>its axis is shooting out stuff. These are the largest

0:26:12.270 --> 0:26:18.150
<v S1>jets they've ever seen, stretching 23 million light years, which

0:26:18.150 --> 0:26:24.120
<v S1>is lining up 140 Milky Way galaxies. That is ridiculous.

0:26:24.150 --> 0:26:27.930
<v S1>Voyager one, my favorite like friend. Like, I don't know,

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:30.570
<v S1>I'll talk to this guy like, hey, we're still watching you.

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:33.240
<v S1>You're doing good. You're doing good, buddy. You're doing good.

0:26:33.270 --> 0:26:38.430
<v S1>47 year old spacecraft cruising through space since the late 70s.

0:26:38.430 --> 0:26:41.310
<v S1>Fired up thrusters that he hasn't used in decades. I

0:26:41.340 --> 0:26:43.740
<v S1>right here. Meanwhile, the asphalt on our roads has to

0:26:43.740 --> 0:26:46.409
<v S1>be replaced, like, every 45 minutes. They don't make them

0:26:46.410 --> 0:26:48.510
<v S1>like they used to. Interesting piece in the Wall Street

0:26:48.510 --> 0:26:53.010
<v S1>Journal about how pediatricians might have sparked the peanut allergy epidemic.

0:26:53.010 --> 0:26:55.500
<v S1>So basically they they told parents, make sure they don't

0:26:55.530 --> 0:26:58.860
<v S1>eat peanuts because they're make sure you don't eat peanuts

0:26:58.859 --> 0:27:02.490
<v S1>because peanuts will give you allergies. Not eating the peanuts

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:05.070
<v S1>is what gives you the peanut allergy. I think that's

0:27:05.070 --> 0:27:08.100
<v S1>what it's saying. I'm not a peanut doctor, but I'm

0:27:08.100 --> 0:27:10.170
<v S1>pretty sure that's what it's saying. And I've heard this

0:27:10.170 --> 0:27:14.580
<v S1>from a million places. Ridiculous. Is that my new favorite word? Probably.

0:27:14.609 --> 0:27:19.050
<v S1>Ohio is directly funding private schools with taxpayer money. I'm

0:27:19.050 --> 0:27:21.479
<v S1>all for more structure in schools, but I think we

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:23.520
<v S1>need to be careful about how we get there, like

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:27.640
<v S1>not with a theocracy. Hopefully, Motus is revolutionizing wildlife tracking,

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:32.050
<v S1>using lightweight radio transmitters to monitor the movements of small

0:27:32.050 --> 0:27:35.199
<v S1>flying animals like birds, bats and insects. Putting a radio

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:39.970
<v S1>transmitter on an insect that's a big insect. 50,000 animals

0:27:39.970 --> 0:27:45.490
<v S1>across 400 species since 2014. All right. Discovery reCAPTCHA fish.

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:48.370
<v S1>My buddy John Hammond created a fishing tool that mimics

0:27:48.369 --> 0:27:52.240
<v S1>a reCAPTCHA form and steals your stuff. RGA rip grep

0:27:52.270 --> 0:27:56.919
<v S1>on growth hormone basically lets you search through not only

0:27:56.950 --> 0:27:59.230
<v S1>the normal stuff you could do with rip grep, because

0:27:59.230 --> 0:28:01.270
<v S1>this is a wrapper for rip grep, but lets you

0:28:01.270 --> 0:28:05.380
<v S1>search through PDFs, ebooks, office documents, and even compressed files.

0:28:05.380 --> 0:28:07.690
<v S1>So it's got a whole bunch of extras built in

0:28:07.690 --> 0:28:09.879
<v S1>so that rip grep is just way better. In fact,

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:11.919
<v S1>I need to install that like right now. Anyway, I'll

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:14.890
<v S1>do that later. All right. Nuclei templates. We talked about

0:28:14.890 --> 0:28:17.020
<v S1>that one Dune shell a new take on the command

0:28:17.020 --> 0:28:22.090
<v S1>line experiment experience. Aim to bring a cozy customizable feel

0:28:22.090 --> 0:28:27.250
<v S1>that bash lacks dam vulnerable drone drone hacking simulator sci

0:28:27.250 --> 0:28:30.700
<v S1>fi ideas. Someone compiled a massive CSV file containing every

0:28:30.730 --> 0:28:37.540
<v S1>sci fi idea imaginable. Eli Burzynski Bendersky Eli Bendersky talks

0:28:37.540 --> 0:28:41.890
<v S1>about building LLM powered applications in go fabric. Recently switched

0:28:41.890 --> 0:28:45.550
<v S1>to go. We got a sick go developer now helping

0:28:45.550 --> 0:28:49.330
<v S1>Jonathan and I out and yeah, it's going really well.

0:28:49.660 --> 0:28:52.060
<v S1>That's definitely the next language I'm going to be doing.

0:28:52.060 --> 0:28:54.550
<v S1>Everything in is all go. Asset node talks about their

0:28:54.550 --> 0:28:57.040
<v S1>approach to recon, and Paul Graham's one pager on how

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:59.650
<v S1>to start a startup. Really like the format of this thing.

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:04.030
<v S1>Look at this thing. Pretty clean idea people. What customers want. Yeah,

0:29:04.060 --> 0:29:07.390
<v S1>quite nice ideas. Don't call them LMS. Probably the biggest

0:29:07.390 --> 0:29:10.330
<v S1>idea that's exploded in my mind lately is Karpathy's point

0:29:10.330 --> 0:29:14.290
<v S1>about LMS being poorly named. So he basically says Transformers

0:29:14.290 --> 0:29:18.490
<v S1>are general purpose computer systems and that LMS are actually

0:29:18.490 --> 0:29:22.270
<v S1>sequence predictors. And crucially, it doesn't matter what the stream is.

0:29:22.300 --> 0:29:25.000
<v S1>We just happen to be sending language right now. But

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:28.420
<v S1>you can actually send anything. And it actually that takes

0:29:28.420 --> 0:29:31.600
<v S1>us right into the recommendation of the week. Start reframing

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:35.020
<v S1>your thinking about AI and specifically about llms away from

0:29:35.020 --> 0:29:38.590
<v S1>just the next token of text. Instead, think of it

0:29:38.590 --> 0:29:42.580
<v S1>as sequence prediction and then one level after that, think

0:29:42.580 --> 0:29:46.480
<v S1>of it as answer prediction. So as Karpathy talks about

0:29:46.510 --> 0:29:52.120
<v S1>transformer architecture works on sequences of anything languages was, you know,

0:29:52.150 --> 0:29:55.630
<v S1>language was just a natural start. It works on whatever

0:29:55.630 --> 0:29:58.660
<v S1>you feed it. It's just a sequence thing. So the

0:29:58.660 --> 0:30:01.540
<v S1>recommendation of the week is to update your model of

0:30:01.540 --> 0:30:06.880
<v S1>AI from specific text predictor to generalized answer predictor. And

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:10.120
<v S1>in fact, that's my new favorite acronym for AI. I'm

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:12.940
<v S1>going to try not seriously to try to convince people

0:30:12.940 --> 0:30:18.280
<v S1>to use this gap gap generalized answer predictor. I think

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:21.310
<v S1>it's way better than LM. It doesn't mean it's going

0:30:21.340 --> 0:30:25.010
<v S1>to win it. You know, the best acronym doesn't win.

0:30:25.010 --> 0:30:28.100
<v S1>It's the one that people just decide to use. And

0:30:28.100 --> 0:30:30.980
<v S1>the aphorism for the week people are strange. They are

0:30:30.980 --> 0:30:34.070
<v S1>constantly angered by trivial things. But on a major matter

0:30:34.070 --> 0:30:37.670
<v S1>like totally wasting their lives, they hardly seem to notice.

0:30:37.700 --> 0:30:41.780
<v S1>People are strange. They're constantly angered by trivial things. But

0:30:41.780 --> 0:30:45.680
<v S1>on a major matter like totally wasting their lives, they

0:30:45.710 --> 0:30:51.740
<v S1>hardly seem to notice. Charles Bukowski. Unsupervised learning is produced

0:30:51.740 --> 0:30:54.800
<v S1>and edited by Daniel Meisler on a Neumann U87 AI

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:59.000
<v S1>microphone using Hindenburg. Intro and outro music is by zombie

0:30:59.030 --> 0:31:02.030
<v S1>with a Y. And to get the text and links

0:31:02.030 --> 0:31:04.280
<v S1>from this episode, sign up for the newsletter version of

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:09.920
<v S1>the show at Daniel meisler.com/newsletter. We'll see you next time.