WEBVTT - UL NO. 471 | STANDARD EDITION: Cyber Standing Down, China's Innovation Burst, PC vs. NPC, Why AI Can't Understand, and more...

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.939
<v S1>Unsupervised Learning is a podcast about trends and ideas in cybersecurity,

0:00:04.970 --> 0:00:10.010
<v S1>national security, AI, technology and society, and how best to

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:17.510
<v S1>upgrade ourselves to be ready for what's coming. All right,

0:00:17.510 --> 0:00:21.890
<v S1>welcome to Unsupervised Learning is Daniel and episode 471. Hope

0:00:21.890 --> 0:00:25.340
<v S1>your week is going well. Updates on my side want

0:00:25.340 --> 0:00:28.610
<v S1>to publicly shame myself here, so I basically hack and

0:00:28.610 --> 0:00:33.019
<v S1>write for most of the day for work, and pretty

0:00:33.020 --> 0:00:37.339
<v S1>much every single meal I have at some fast food restaurant,

0:00:37.340 --> 0:00:42.470
<v S1>which is just unbelievable for somebody who is supposed to

0:00:42.470 --> 0:00:44.900
<v S1>be smart. It is really bad for your health to

0:00:44.930 --> 0:00:48.500
<v S1>do this, and it's really pure laziness and also just

0:00:48.500 --> 0:00:51.980
<v S1>intimidation of like how to do this cooking thing properly

0:00:51.979 --> 0:00:54.800
<v S1>and basically go and eat in the car and come

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:59.570
<v S1>back and get right back into working. Um, but I

0:00:59.570 --> 0:01:03.440
<v S1>Must start cooking at home. Now, I put this in

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.679
<v S1>the newsletter and the newsletter went out before you're hearing this.

0:01:06.709 --> 0:01:11.390
<v S1>As you probably know, and, uh, I got close to

0:01:11.420 --> 0:01:18.710
<v S1>500 email responses. It was absolutely overwhelming. It is. Hundreds

0:01:18.709 --> 0:01:22.730
<v S1>of people reaching out already bought my pressure cooker or

0:01:22.730 --> 0:01:26.150
<v S1>what is it? Instant pot already bought that thing because

0:01:26.150 --> 0:01:28.820
<v S1>everyone pointed me to that being like the best way

0:01:28.819 --> 0:01:33.440
<v S1>to do things. And, uh, got a specific one, which

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.140
<v S1>seemed to be like one of the most popular ones. Also,

0:01:36.140 --> 0:01:39.560
<v S1>it was on Wirecutter, I think, as well. But, uh, yeah,

0:01:39.590 --> 0:01:41.150
<v S1>I'm going to try to do the eggs thing. I'm

0:01:41.150 --> 0:01:43.580
<v S1>going to try to do the steak thing and, uh,

0:01:43.580 --> 0:01:47.750
<v S1>really appreciate all of you who responded to help me out.

0:01:47.780 --> 0:01:50.360
<v S1>It sounds like a lot of us have been going

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:53.690
<v S1>through that and have figured it out to some degree.

0:01:53.690 --> 0:01:57.830
<v S1>So really appreciate all the feedback. If you're into cloud security,

0:01:57.860 --> 0:02:00.860
<v S1>you need to be following my buddy Rich mogul's cloud

0:02:00.860 --> 0:02:05.420
<v S1>security lab a week. So cloud slaw is one of

0:02:05.420 --> 0:02:08.120
<v S1>the absolute best cloud security people on Earth. And he's

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:12.829
<v S1>putting out really high quality labs for free, like every week.

0:02:12.860 --> 0:02:15.710
<v S1>And he's like an EMT and he's like a really

0:02:15.710 --> 0:02:20.270
<v S1>great guy. He's just fantastic. So definitely recommend you check

0:02:20.270 --> 0:02:25.040
<v S1>him out. Cloud slaw. Rich Mogull and AI's ultimate use

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:28.130
<v S1>case transition from current to desired state. I'm going to

0:02:28.130 --> 0:02:29.780
<v S1>do a separate video about this. So I'm not going

0:02:29.810 --> 0:02:32.960
<v S1>to talk about this blog post. Cybersecurity. A lot of

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:36.739
<v S1>confusion about what's happening in the Trump administration supposedly standing

0:02:36.740 --> 0:02:40.880
<v S1>down U.S. cyber operations around Russia. So stories first say

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.160
<v S1>it's like government wide, and then it's like, no, it's

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.640
<v S1>not really all the government. It's only certain departments. These

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:50.510
<v S1>things are happening so fast. You and you don't know

0:02:50.510 --> 0:02:52.550
<v S1>the quality of the signal that we're getting from these

0:02:52.550 --> 0:02:55.940
<v S1>different sources. So it's like I tend to like be

0:02:55.940 --> 0:02:59.720
<v S1>waiting and just seeing what actually turns out to be

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:04.190
<v S1>the case because something could be hyper overblown. It's just

0:03:04.190 --> 0:03:06.650
<v S1>really hard to track things right now because it's so

0:03:06.650 --> 0:03:09.320
<v S1>much chaos going on. And I've got a lot to say, though,

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:14.510
<v S1>about the general vibe of the administration seeming to move

0:03:14.540 --> 0:03:20.299
<v S1>towards Russia and away from trusting its own Intel people.

0:03:20.300 --> 0:03:22.580
<v S1>So that is a really huge problem for me, which

0:03:22.580 --> 0:03:25.070
<v S1>I'm going to talk about more below. VMware is releasing

0:03:25.100 --> 0:03:30.230
<v S1>emergency patches for three actively exploited flaws in ESXi workstation

0:03:30.230 --> 0:03:35.510
<v S1>and fusion new polyglot malware campaign called Suzano, targeting aviation

0:03:35.510 --> 0:03:39.230
<v S1>and satellite companies in the UAE. Hirsch IoT intercoms are

0:03:39.230 --> 0:03:43.340
<v S1>letting anyone with Google access unlock apartment doors due to

0:03:43.370 --> 0:03:46.730
<v S1>known default credentials. So this is like somebody could use

0:03:46.730 --> 0:03:50.210
<v S1>an app to, like, break into apartments who are protected

0:03:50.210 --> 0:03:54.350
<v S1>by this particular type of IoT. When IoT was a

0:03:54.350 --> 0:03:57.950
<v S1>big thing, like the talk about IoT was a big thing.

0:03:58.310 --> 0:04:02.090
<v S1>When was that? Was that like 2012? 2015? I feel

0:04:02.090 --> 0:04:05.900
<v S1>like it was around that area. And I did a

0:04:05.900 --> 0:04:08.180
<v S1>lot of press at that time talking about it. And

0:04:08.180 --> 0:04:10.250
<v S1>I was just like, I think this is kind of

0:04:10.250 --> 0:04:14.540
<v S1>overblown because what people don't realize about this is you

0:04:14.540 --> 0:04:17.359
<v S1>have to properly threat model. So you have to look

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:20.779
<v S1>at the Venn diagram of people who want to break

0:04:20.779 --> 0:04:25.730
<v S1>into places and steal things and are willing to break

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:29.210
<v S1>the law in order to do that. That's one circle.

0:04:29.570 --> 0:04:32.780
<v S1>The other circle is people who don't know how to

0:04:32.810 --> 0:04:36.140
<v S1>do it. They are unable to get into the building.

0:04:36.140 --> 0:04:40.430
<v S1>It's like too difficult. The locks are stopping them. The

0:04:40.430 --> 0:04:44.000
<v S1>technology is stopping them. The security is stopping them. It's

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.190
<v S1>just a huge problem for them, right? They're not able

0:04:46.190 --> 0:04:48.680
<v S1>to do it. Now, what does this look like for

0:04:48.710 --> 0:04:52.070
<v S1>a Venn diagram? Now, to illuminate this more, think about

0:04:52.070 --> 0:04:56.780
<v S1>what this particular vulnerability is actually going to do to

0:04:56.839 --> 0:05:00.050
<v S1>these two, then to these two circles in the Venn.

0:05:00.050 --> 0:05:03.080
<v S1>I think the answer is it's not going to add

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:07.250
<v S1>too many people to the ones who are actually willing

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:10.550
<v S1>to do the damage. And I don't think it's ultimately

0:05:10.550 --> 0:05:16.100
<v S1>going to result in too many more people getting broken into. So,

0:05:16.100 --> 0:05:19.070
<v S1>in other words, the people who want to break into

0:05:19.100 --> 0:05:23.270
<v S1>apartment buildings, the people who want to break into, uh,

0:05:23.450 --> 0:05:27.200
<v S1>people's homes, people's apartments. I don't think they are limited

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:29.840
<v S1>by not being able to get in. I think locks

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:33.290
<v S1>are too easy to pick and they can get by. Now,

0:05:33.290 --> 0:05:36.260
<v S1>the question is, are there cameras that actually record them

0:05:36.260 --> 0:05:39.529
<v S1>doing it? And here's a better question. The cameras aren't

0:05:39.529 --> 0:05:44.570
<v S1>going away. So is the disincentive because of the cameras?

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:49.969
<v S1>Isn't that still there still stopping a person from potentially

0:05:49.970 --> 0:05:52.940
<v S1>doing this. So I think people will see something like

0:05:52.940 --> 0:05:55.430
<v S1>this and they're like, oh, that's game over. No, you

0:05:55.430 --> 0:05:57.679
<v S1>have to threat model. This is why threat modeling is

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:00.500
<v S1>like one of the most important skill sets that you

0:06:00.500 --> 0:06:05.000
<v S1>could learn for life in general. I'm very thankful for

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:09.500
<v S1>my security education and, you know, all the workshops and

0:06:09.500 --> 0:06:12.650
<v S1>tabletops and everything I've done with threat modeling because it's

0:06:12.650 --> 0:06:15.380
<v S1>a universal life skill, because a lot of things are

0:06:15.380 --> 0:06:20.600
<v S1>emotionally charged. I'm moving to this new city. Oh, it's supposedly, uh,

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:25.219
<v S1>supposedly a dangerous area to be. Um, it's, you know,

0:06:25.250 --> 0:06:27.710
<v S1>there's been x number of crimes in this area. There's

0:06:27.740 --> 0:06:31.040
<v S1>X number of car crashes with this particular type of car.

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.850
<v S1>When you actually gather the data and throw together how

0:06:34.850 --> 0:06:37.160
<v S1>you plan on using this thing, or how you plan

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:40.400
<v S1>on attackers using this thing or whatever, and you start

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:44.630
<v S1>moving through the scenarios that you're worried about. Usually you

0:06:44.630 --> 0:06:49.370
<v S1>end up realizing the things you are emotionally worried about

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:53.000
<v S1>are not the ones, and oftentimes the things you're not

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:56.539
<v S1>emotionally worried about actually are the ones. So this is

0:06:56.540 --> 0:07:00.080
<v S1>a big exercise in, you know, the work of Kahneman

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:05.270
<v S1>where he realized, you know, bias and mental models and

0:07:05.270 --> 0:07:09.380
<v S1>perception is actually far more important to how we see

0:07:09.380 --> 0:07:12.890
<v S1>the world than actual reality. And that really needs to

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:15.830
<v S1>be applied when you're thinking about things like this in,

0:07:15.860 --> 0:07:18.980
<v S1>in cyber or other types of security. Brute forcing attackers

0:07:18.980 --> 0:07:22.130
<v S1>are targeting thousands of ISP networks in the US and

0:07:22.130 --> 0:07:25.580
<v S1>China to deploy stealers that grab crypto wallets and mine

0:07:25.580 --> 0:07:30.680
<v S1>Monero on compromised systems. Meta terminated 20 employees for sharing

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:34.760
<v S1>internal info outside the company after recent stories about unannounced

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:38.929
<v S1>products and meetings. Really cool wired thing here. It's a

0:07:38.930 --> 0:07:42.440
<v S1>wired video shows how Tesla vehicles record everything from driver

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:47.840
<v S1>behavior to biometric data. Ask some pretty smart privacy questions

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:51.290
<v S1>about this whole system. And yeah, it was a great video.

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:54.140
<v S1>I watched the whole thing and a lot of it

0:07:54.170 --> 0:07:57.020
<v S1>is not alarming. A lot. Some of the stuff towards

0:07:57.020 --> 0:07:59.300
<v S1>the end, the end is like really where the meat

0:07:59.330 --> 0:08:03.140
<v S1>of this thing is basically talking about how there's been

0:08:03.140 --> 0:08:08.060
<v S1>some cases of things being abused, like recordings from inside

0:08:08.060 --> 0:08:10.820
<v S1>of cars and stuff like that. I don't think it's widespread.

0:08:10.850 --> 0:08:13.220
<v S1>Otherwise we would have heard a lot more about it,

0:08:13.220 --> 0:08:17.120
<v S1>but it's something to keep in mind. It's especially something

0:08:17.150 --> 0:08:19.310
<v S1>to keep in mind when you're talking about like BYD,

0:08:19.340 --> 0:08:23.210
<v S1>which is the main Tesla competitor, and they're likely to

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:26.690
<v S1>be here in the US soon, I'm guessing. And it's

0:08:26.690 --> 0:08:29.510
<v S1>a pure Chinese company. Okay, so if they have the

0:08:29.510 --> 0:08:34.580
<v S1>same sort of monitoring capability and infrastructure that Tesla does,

0:08:34.580 --> 0:08:38.330
<v S1>but it's a Chinese company, whole different game for me.

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:42.350
<v S1>I've not been super worried about all this surveillance stuff

0:08:42.350 --> 0:08:47.030
<v S1>inside of consumer tech, uh, because of how much I

0:08:47.030 --> 0:08:51.470
<v S1>trust or don't trust the products, where I have cameras,

0:08:51.470 --> 0:08:55.080
<v S1>where I have microphones in my house or in my car,

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:59.520
<v S1>and which companies I'm allowing to actually be part of

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:06.000
<v S1>that network. Right. So I trust Apple very highly, uh,

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:08.160
<v S1>not only because I worked there for a few years

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:11.640
<v S1>in the actual security group, but just because it's pretty

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:16.020
<v S1>clear how much importance they're putting on privacy and security.

0:09:16.020 --> 0:09:19.620
<v S1>And I know that is confirmed for me personally because

0:09:19.620 --> 0:09:21.900
<v S1>I've been on the inside. That's not the case for Google.

0:09:21.900 --> 0:09:24.870
<v S1>For me, it's not the case for Amazon. For me,

0:09:24.870 --> 0:09:27.780
<v S1>it's not the case for meta, necessarily. For me, not

0:09:27.780 --> 0:09:30.449
<v S1>as much as Apple. And it's damn sure not the

0:09:30.450 --> 0:09:35.220
<v S1>case for some Chinese company like TikTok or, or, uh,

0:09:35.370 --> 0:09:39.150
<v S1>you know, ByteDance or whoever it is, or BYD when

0:09:39.150 --> 0:09:41.580
<v S1>those cars come. So you got to think about who

0:09:41.610 --> 0:09:44.460
<v S1>you're sending this stuff actually to. What are their long

0:09:44.490 --> 0:09:48.660
<v S1>term goals? National security. China's research output on next gen

0:09:48.660 --> 0:09:52.020
<v S1>chipmaking tech is now double that of the US, which

0:09:52.020 --> 0:09:57.200
<v S1>suggests that the bands are actually forcing them to get

0:09:57.200 --> 0:10:03.679
<v S1>smarter and more. Innovative. Innovative. That's a word. Innovative. So basically,

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:06.680
<v S1>I was trying to say innovative. I was trying to

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.469
<v S1>say like the British version of that word. Anyway, it

0:10:09.470 --> 0:10:14.030
<v S1>didn't work, but we could be forcing innovation from China,

0:10:14.030 --> 0:10:18.500
<v S1>where they were relying before on theft and relying before

0:10:18.530 --> 0:10:22.520
<v S1>on just kind of like buying other people's good stuff.

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:25.490
<v S1>So we might be getting the exact opposite of what

0:10:25.490 --> 0:10:28.760
<v S1>we planned on getting. We might be waking them up,

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:31.400
<v S1>which is which is really interesting to think about when

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:36.079
<v S1>you think about economics and like stimulus and response, but

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:40.790
<v S1>also quite concerning. Tulsi Gabbard, new director of national intelligence,

0:10:40.790 --> 0:10:44.600
<v S1>is firing more than 100 intelligence officers for sharing explicit

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:49.100
<v S1>messages on an NSA internal platform. But I'm calling shenanigans

0:10:49.100 --> 0:10:52.130
<v S1>on this. A number of my trans friends who know

0:10:52.130 --> 0:10:54.860
<v S1>a lot about intelligence and cyber are saying this is 100%

0:10:54.860 --> 0:10:58.460
<v S1>an attempt to remove trans people from government, and they're

0:10:58.460 --> 0:11:02.179
<v S1>using like this explicit content thing as like the cover

0:11:02.179 --> 0:11:04.910
<v S1>story for that. It looks like the messages in question

0:11:04.940 --> 0:11:09.140
<v S1>were like about getting like bottom surgery. Similar topics. Kind

0:11:09.170 --> 0:11:13.429
<v S1>of like women talking about post-pregnancy body issues or whatever.

0:11:13.460 --> 0:11:16.910
<v S1>So it could be considered explicit or personal or gross

0:11:16.910 --> 0:11:19.370
<v S1>or whatever in certain lights. But that's all part of

0:11:19.370 --> 0:11:22.760
<v S1>being human, right? So the question is, were these the

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:25.490
<v S1>right forums to talk about such things? Was it like

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:29.540
<v S1>egregious or was it like partial? And I didn't see

0:11:29.540 --> 0:11:32.449
<v S1>the messages. I don't know the forum they were doing

0:11:32.450 --> 0:11:35.780
<v S1>this in. I actually did get a reach out from

0:11:35.780 --> 0:11:38.690
<v S1>someone in the IC community, actually, kind of like on

0:11:38.690 --> 0:11:42.620
<v S1>the inside around here around the topic, who actually did

0:11:42.650 --> 0:11:46.729
<v S1>see all this stuff. And they said it was pretty

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:51.320
<v S1>egregious and it was pretty bad and I don't know.

0:11:51.350 --> 0:11:53.600
<v S1>So first of all, they could be lying. Second of all,

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:56.360
<v S1>I don't think they were, but they could be lying.

0:11:56.390 --> 0:11:59.150
<v S1>It's also a single data point. It's a single opinion.

0:11:59.960 --> 0:12:02.449
<v S1>The point is, there's kind of two obvious ways to

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:06.110
<v S1>go here. Like, it was really bad, and they deserve

0:12:06.110 --> 0:12:10.219
<v S1>to be punished or whatever. But I say there's two

0:12:10.220 --> 0:12:12.020
<v S1>ways of looking at it. First of all, there's a

0:12:12.020 --> 0:12:14.300
<v S1>bunch of trans people ignoring their work and spending their

0:12:14.300 --> 0:12:19.160
<v S1>time talking about personal trans issues in an inappropriate forum

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.339
<v S1>in an inappropriate way when they should have been working.

0:12:22.850 --> 0:12:24.980
<v S1>So they got fired. That's one way to think about it.

0:12:24.980 --> 0:12:27.980
<v S1>Another way to think about it is Tulsi Gabbard is

0:12:27.980 --> 0:12:31.760
<v S1>part of an extremely anti-trans administration that is looking for

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.910
<v S1>any excuse to fire trans people, even if it harms

0:12:34.910 --> 0:12:37.910
<v S1>our ability to do intelligence work. And this is a

0:12:37.910 --> 0:12:40.610
<v S1>cover story for doing so. Again, I'm not close to

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:43.850
<v S1>the sources, so I can't operate with any certainty. But giving,

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:47.300
<v S1>given what we know the administration is actually doing against

0:12:47.300 --> 0:12:51.329
<v S1>trans people and how like aggressively they're going after this issue.

0:12:51.390 --> 0:12:53.790
<v S1>I think it's more likely to be number two for me.

0:12:53.790 --> 0:12:58.020
<v S1>That's just logical. TSMC is planning to invest $100 billion

0:12:58.020 --> 0:13:00.780
<v S1>in US chip plants over the next four years, according

0:13:00.809 --> 0:13:05.160
<v S1>to President Trump's announcement yesterday, which was a few days

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:08.670
<v S1>ago now. And I think this is great. Get all

0:13:08.670 --> 0:13:12.570
<v S1>these companies here, Apple to spin them up in Arizona.

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:15.000
<v S1>Like we got plenty of desert. We got plenty of

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:19.080
<v S1>wide open spaces. Let's build some giant solar farms. Let's

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:22.680
<v S1>get chip production here. Let's get Apple production here. Let's

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:25.680
<v S1>get everything over here. Because the world is crazy. All right.

0:13:25.710 --> 0:13:29.610
<v S1>I anthropic closed a $3.5 billion funding round that values

0:13:29.610 --> 0:13:35.280
<v S1>the company at 61.5 billion. Revenue has grown 1,000% year

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:39.809
<v S1>over year. Really? Feels like they're quietly doing what OpenAI

0:13:39.809 --> 0:13:42.840
<v S1>is loudly failing at. And I think this should be

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:46.109
<v S1>really encouraging for companies that enter spaces that seem like

0:13:46.110 --> 0:13:49.050
<v S1>they're already won. Like you wouldn't want to go up

0:13:49.050 --> 0:13:54.780
<v S1>against OpenAI in, say, early 2023. They just owned the

0:13:54.780 --> 0:13:59.190
<v S1>entire AI world and there was nobody around to compete.

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:03.989
<v S1>And here we are beginning of 25, and we've got

0:14:03.990 --> 0:14:07.470
<v S1>a few people competing and we've got open models competing.

0:14:07.470 --> 0:14:12.000
<v S1>It's it's really encouraging, actually, as you know, if you're

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:15.960
<v S1>trying to get people excited about being creative and building,

0:14:16.230 --> 0:14:20.100
<v S1>it's it's great to see somebody that was untouchable two

0:14:20.100 --> 0:14:25.440
<v S1>years ago be very touchable now. OpenAI released GPT 4.5.

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.890
<v S1>Most people are not happy with it. It a lot

0:14:28.890 --> 0:14:31.230
<v S1>of people are saying it doesn't feel smarter at all.

0:14:31.230 --> 0:14:33.989
<v S1>And to me it felt like like a push, like

0:14:33.990 --> 0:14:38.130
<v S1>PR release because sonnet 3.7 came out. Other models have

0:14:38.130 --> 0:14:42.210
<v S1>come out recently and yeah, it just it didn't go well.

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:44.400
<v S1>They should have paused on that and waited for a

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:48.810
<v S1>bigger release that was more more baked, more proper marketing

0:14:48.810 --> 0:14:52.229
<v S1>around it and everything. Chinese government is telling its AI

0:14:52.230 --> 0:14:55.020
<v S1>experts to avoid US travel because they're worried they might

0:14:55.050 --> 0:15:01.380
<v S1>leak Chinese secrets. Yeah. Leaking AI secrets. China's worried about it. Cool.

0:15:01.590 --> 0:15:06.840
<v S1>Roger Penrose explains why Godel's theorem mathematically proves that artificial

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:12.450
<v S1>intelligence can't truly replicate human consciousness or understanding. I disagree

0:15:12.450 --> 0:15:16.590
<v S1>with this, obviously, but it's Roger Penrose. I think he's

0:15:16.590 --> 0:15:19.410
<v S1>a great thinker, or at least has been a great

0:15:19.410 --> 0:15:22.890
<v S1>thinker on a lot of different topics. I know that

0:15:22.890 --> 0:15:26.160
<v S1>there are a few areas, not counting AI, where I

0:15:26.190 --> 0:15:29.400
<v S1>disagree with him, but doesn't matter. He is a top

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:33.990
<v S1>tier thinker and he disagrees with my position. Therefore I

0:15:34.020 --> 0:15:37.860
<v S1>am putting it in the newsletter. Marc Benioff says Salesforce

0:15:37.860 --> 0:15:42.510
<v S1>won't hire engineers in 2025 because their AI agents are

0:15:42.510 --> 0:15:46.650
<v S1>doing the work so effectively. That sounds awesome and I

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:50.670
<v S1>kind of believe him. However, this is also direct marketing

0:15:50.670 --> 0:15:53.700
<v S1>for Agent Force, which is their product. So hard to

0:15:53.730 --> 0:15:56.370
<v S1>tell if this is marketing or real. New study shows

0:15:56.370 --> 0:16:00.810
<v S1>that large language models are just echoing logical patterns without

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:06.120
<v S1>real understanding, which explains why they struggle with complex reasoning. Again,

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:11.040
<v S1>I want to see the best possible arguments against my position. Technology.

0:16:11.070 --> 0:16:16.440
<v S1>Waymo now handles over 200,000 paid robotaxi rides weekly across

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:22.440
<v S1>three cities 20 times growth 20 x growth. That's how

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:24.450
<v S1>you're supposed to say that 20 x growth in just

0:16:24.450 --> 0:16:30.060
<v S1>two years. BYD and DJI have created a $2,200 vehicle

0:16:30.060 --> 0:16:36.750
<v S1>mounted drone launch platform that lets your BYD vehicle deploy

0:16:36.750 --> 0:16:41.160
<v S1>and retrieve drones while driving up to 15mph. This is

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:42.930
<v S1>the kind of cool stuff that I'm talking about that

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:45.600
<v S1>BYD is coming out with. They also had a video

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:49.530
<v S1>recently of their electric car doing a turbo boost, like

0:16:49.530 --> 0:16:53.460
<v S1>over a pothole or something. Insane stuff. Like they're doing

0:16:53.460 --> 0:16:58.590
<v S1>some pretty innovative stuff. I'm worried about us carmakers competing

0:16:58.590 --> 0:17:01.410
<v S1>against them, I really am. It's like, this is why

0:17:01.410 --> 0:17:04.650
<v S1>I'm kind of like, I like Tesla as a foil

0:17:04.650 --> 0:17:10.500
<v S1>against them, right? I'm obviously very unhappy with Elon right now.

0:17:10.710 --> 0:17:13.830
<v S1>So that's that's got me a bit torn. But I

0:17:13.830 --> 0:17:17.369
<v S1>do not want American car companies to fall to BYD

0:17:17.730 --> 0:17:22.169
<v S1>because their cars are way cheaper, way cooler, and you know,

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:24.390
<v S1>no one else can keep up with them. It seems

0:17:24.390 --> 0:17:27.480
<v S1>like Tesla's got the only chance. All right, humans, all right.

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:31.409
<v S1>The housing theory of everything argues that our catastrophically restrictive

0:17:31.410 --> 0:17:36.119
<v S1>housing policies create cascading problems across society, from inequality to

0:17:36.150 --> 0:17:43.620
<v S1>climate change. Many Doraiswamy Doraiswamy talks about how solopreneurs are

0:17:43.619 --> 0:17:48.360
<v S1>becoming real competition to traditional companies thanks to AI coding,

0:17:48.390 --> 0:17:53.220
<v S1>top MBA programs, seeing way fewer grads landing jobs quickly.

0:17:53.220 --> 0:17:59.430
<v S1>With Harvard's unemployment rate jumping from 4 to 15% since 2021.

0:17:59.430 --> 0:18:03.120
<v S1>Think about what a Harvard MBA with potentially not too

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:06.540
<v S1>much experience in the real world of business is able

0:18:06.540 --> 0:18:11.400
<v S1>to do in a world full of very, very smart AI.

0:18:11.790 --> 0:18:14.940
<v S1>What exactly are we getting from this Harvard MBA? I

0:18:14.940 --> 0:18:18.540
<v S1>think so many things. This is kind of a meta

0:18:18.540 --> 0:18:25.590
<v S1>analysis here. So many things that are extremely expensive and elitist.

0:18:25.590 --> 0:18:29.970
<v S1>And they are those things because they are supply constrained.

0:18:29.970 --> 0:18:33.030
<v S1>You can't get into Harvard. Therefore, Harvard is worth a lot.

0:18:33.060 --> 0:18:36.420
<v S1>A degree from there is worth a lot, right? You

0:18:36.450 --> 0:18:40.710
<v S1>it's hard to raise $200 million from a VC. Therefore,

0:18:40.710 --> 0:18:43.950
<v S1>any company who makes a product that's backed by a

0:18:43.980 --> 0:18:48.210
<v S1>VC and has raised $200 million. The product must be good.

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:52.800
<v S1>This is dying. This concept is dying. That's why things

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:57.900
<v S1>like Harvard are going to massively struggle, because the value

0:18:57.900 --> 0:19:01.980
<v S1>of what they're actually producing is not going to be

0:19:01.980 --> 0:19:04.649
<v S1>as good as if you watched a whole lot of

0:19:04.650 --> 0:19:07.860
<v S1>YouTube and read a whole lot of books and did

0:19:07.859 --> 0:19:10.770
<v S1>a whole lot of writing, right, and moved ideas through

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:14.369
<v S1>your mind very quickly, and actually worked with companies and

0:19:14.369 --> 0:19:17.820
<v S1>had experience on the ground. The difference between that education

0:19:17.820 --> 0:19:21.660
<v S1>and a Harvard education is about to be pretty vast,

0:19:21.660 --> 0:19:25.800
<v S1>benefiting the YouTube side, not the Harvard side. Yet the

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:27.899
<v S1>YouTube one is available to you if you want to

0:19:27.900 --> 0:19:32.280
<v S1>study right. This dynamic is going to change startups. It's

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:36.660
<v S1>going to change education. It's basically changing everything. It's like

0:19:36.690 --> 0:19:39.900
<v S1>the it's not just AI, right? This is also a

0:19:39.900 --> 0:19:45.090
<v S1>content explosion. This is also a YouTube trend vibe, where

0:19:45.090 --> 0:19:48.030
<v S1>all the best content is coming out into blogs, coming

0:19:48.030 --> 0:19:52.110
<v S1>out into YouTube. By the way, YouTube is blogging, right?

0:19:52.410 --> 0:19:54.690
<v S1>It used to be that there were very few bloggers.

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:58.770
<v S1>Now there's very few YouTubers. I mean, a tiny percentage

0:19:58.770 --> 0:20:02.220
<v S1>of 1% of people in the United States are actually

0:20:02.220 --> 0:20:05.550
<v S1>putting out content on YouTube, just like it was with blogging.

0:20:05.550 --> 0:20:09.870
<v S1>But that's where the content is, okay, both in blogging

0:20:09.869 --> 0:20:14.190
<v S1>and newsletters, but also YouTube. This is the front edge

0:20:14.190 --> 0:20:16.920
<v S1>of things, right? This is the front edge of things.

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:20.190
<v S1>This is where the content is. So just something to

0:20:20.190 --> 0:20:25.330
<v S1>keep in mind. Researchers mapped porn titles from 2008 to

0:20:25.330 --> 0:20:29.850
<v S1>2023 and showed a disturbing migration in themes from Hot

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:36.000
<v S1>Blonde gets you know what to increasingly incestuous and violent

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:40.020
<v S1>concepts like I can't resist my stepsister. I find this

0:20:40.020 --> 0:20:43.980
<v S1>really disturbing because it's like, I would love to get

0:20:44.010 --> 0:20:46.140
<v S1>AI to look at this. Actually, I should go find

0:20:46.140 --> 0:20:49.919
<v S1>this data set. This link here is actually the GitHub

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:53.370
<v S1>with the data in there and the data analysis. But

0:20:53.369 --> 0:20:57.180
<v S1>I imagine you could take all those titles 2008 to 23.

0:20:57.180 --> 0:21:03.209
<v S1>So what is this? This is like 1013 plus 215

0:21:03.210 --> 0:21:08.160
<v S1>years of title data, 15 years of title data that

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.639
<v S1>you could put into, like whatever Google Studio. It would

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:13.890
<v S1>probably be pretty hard to actually do this on a

0:21:13.890 --> 0:21:17.280
<v S1>on a pinnacle model, because it's going to be like, uh,

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:21.390
<v S1>what is this? These are all nasty words. Um, but

0:21:21.390 --> 0:21:23.639
<v S1>maybe if you told it that you were doing research,

0:21:23.670 --> 0:21:28.980
<v S1>maybe that would work, uh, like a prompt injection bypass technique.

0:21:28.980 --> 0:21:31.470
<v S1>But anyway, the point is, you can put this into, like,

0:21:31.500 --> 0:21:36.869
<v S1>Google Studio Flash 2.0 something with a large context, maybe even, like,

0:21:36.900 --> 0:21:42.420
<v S1>you know, um, oh three mini oh one Pro. Uh,

0:21:42.450 --> 0:21:46.050
<v S1>sonnet 37, one of the smarter ones. And just be like,

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:48.750
<v S1>I have a question. What the hell is happening to

0:21:48.780 --> 0:21:55.740
<v S1>my society? Seeing these, uh, titles migrate from 2008 to 2023,

0:21:55.770 --> 0:21:59.700
<v S1>what is going on? Uh, I'd be really excited to, like,

0:21:59.730 --> 0:22:03.780
<v S1>see what it actually gives as an answer to that. Right. Well,

0:22:03.780 --> 0:22:08.070
<v S1>I say excited. Uh, depressed. Um, yeah, I don't know.

0:22:08.070 --> 0:22:13.380
<v S1>It's not quite depressed. It's more like worried. Concerned. Yeah. Anyway,

0:22:13.410 --> 0:22:17.310
<v S1>number of young people not in education, employment or training.

0:22:17.310 --> 0:22:20.730
<v S1>Neet has hit an 11 year high. I didn't use

0:22:20.730 --> 0:22:26.730
<v S1>an Oxford comma. I'm canceling everything and getting off the internet.

0:22:26.970 --> 0:22:30.990
<v S1>This is highly, highly scary. Yeah. I wonder if I

0:22:31.020 --> 0:22:35.820
<v S1>copied something here from a sentence. Because this is a

0:22:35.820 --> 0:22:40.379
<v S1>British story. Yeah. Did I copy and paste this Neet part?

0:22:40.380 --> 0:22:42.750
<v S1>I don't know why that doesn't have an Oxford comma.

0:22:42.750 --> 0:22:46.860
<v S1>It seriously disturbs me. All right. Solarpunk is a subgenre

0:22:46.859 --> 0:22:50.130
<v S1>of sci fi that imagines a sustainable future where humans

0:22:50.130 --> 0:22:54.359
<v S1>and nature thrive together using renewable technology. I've been a

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:58.350
<v S1>fan ever since the Chobani commercial by one of my

0:22:58.350 --> 0:23:04.020
<v S1>favorite commercials ever. It is a yogurt commercial about solarpunk.

0:23:04.050 --> 0:23:07.080
<v S1>It is fantastic. Go to the newsletter and click on

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:11.490
<v S1>this link. It is the best. Um, although talking to

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:14.670
<v S1>my friend who I'm hoping to have on the podcast soon,

0:23:14.670 --> 0:23:18.240
<v S1>he's like, well, you know, Nazis love the solarpunk stuff.

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:20.879
<v S1>I'm like, why is it every time I tell you

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:24.840
<v S1>something's cool, you're like, yeah, there's a subgroup of like,

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:28.230
<v S1>crazy Catholics who are like super into this and they're

0:23:28.230 --> 0:23:34.830
<v S1>like all very trad trad like, um, oriented, and they're

0:23:34.830 --> 0:23:37.410
<v S1>trying to destroy technology or whatever. And I'm just like,

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:39.990
<v S1>oh my God. Every time I talk to it, every

0:23:40.020 --> 0:23:42.490
<v S1>time I talk to him, I'm like, what is going on?

0:23:43.210 --> 0:23:45.609
<v S1>But that should be a cool podcast if that happens

0:23:45.730 --> 0:23:47.950
<v S1>within the next couple of weeks. We're going to talk

0:23:47.950 --> 0:23:52.300
<v S1>about all the different sub political movements going on in

0:23:52.300 --> 0:23:55.389
<v S1>the Bay area where we live, but also in general

0:23:55.810 --> 0:23:58.840
<v S1>post liberalism ideas like that. It's going to be an

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:02.350
<v S1>insane episode. And Ellen might go on Jon Stewart's show

0:24:02.350 --> 0:24:07.480
<v S1>and discuss Doge. That would be a cool debate slash discussion,

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:11.109
<v S1>hopefully a discussion. Hopefully it's good. Ellen, who shows up.

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:17.980
<v S1>All right. This is the end of the standard edition

0:24:17.980 --> 0:24:20.770
<v S1>of the podcast, which includes just the news items for

0:24:20.770 --> 0:24:23.140
<v S1>the week to get the rest of the episode, which

0:24:23.170 --> 0:24:26.500
<v S1>includes my analysis, the discovery section that has all of

0:24:26.500 --> 0:24:30.100
<v S1>the coolest tools and articles. I found this week, the

0:24:30.100 --> 0:24:32.890
<v S1>recommendation of the week and the aphorism of the week.

0:24:32.890 --> 0:24:37.390
<v S1>Please consider becoming a member. As a member, you'll get

0:24:37.390 --> 0:24:41.010
<v S1>lots of different things from access to our extraordinary community

0:24:41.010 --> 0:24:44.790
<v S1>of over a thousand brilliant and kind people in industries

0:24:44.790 --> 0:24:50.100
<v S1>like cybersecurity, AI, technology and the humanities. You also get

0:24:50.130 --> 0:24:54.330
<v S1>access to the UL Book Club, dedicated member content and events,

0:24:54.330 --> 0:24:58.440
<v S1>and lots, lots more. Plus, you'll get a dedicated podcast

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:00.750
<v S1>feed you can put in your client that gets you

0:25:00.750 --> 0:25:04.530
<v S1>the full member edition of this podcast. To become a

0:25:04.530 --> 0:25:07.200
<v S1>member and get all of that, just head over to

0:25:07.230 --> 0:25:14.460
<v S1>Daniel maestro.com/upgrade. That's Daniel miessler.com/upgrade. We'll see you next time.

0:25:15.900 --> 0:25:19.680
<v S1>Unsupervised learning is produced on Hindenburg Pro using an SM

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:23.280
<v S1>seven B microphone. A video version of the podcast is

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:27.000
<v S1>available on the Unsupervised Learning YouTube channel, and the text

0:25:27.030 --> 0:25:30.300
<v S1>version with full links and notes is available at Daniel

0:25:30.300 --> 0:25:34.260
<v S1>Mysa.com slash newsletter. We'll see you next time.