WEBVTT - UL NO. 444: Pizza Meter Intelligence, China Bypasses Bans, Securing AWS Secrets…

0:00:00.110 --> 0:00:03.680
<v S1>Whether you're starting or scaling your company's security program, demonstrating

0:00:03.710 --> 0:00:07.220
<v S1>top notch security practices and establishing trust is more important

0:00:07.220 --> 0:00:14.900
<v S1>than ever. Vanta automates compliance for Soc2, ISO 27,001 and more,

0:00:14.900 --> 0:00:19.520
<v S1>saving you time and money while helping you build customer trust. Plus,

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:23.780
<v S1>you can streamline security reviews by automating questionnaires and demonstrating

0:00:23.780 --> 0:00:27.500
<v S1>your security posture with a customer facing trust center, all

0:00:27.500 --> 0:00:32.970
<v S1>powered by AI. Over 7000 global companies like Atlassian, Flow

0:00:32.970 --> 0:00:36.090
<v S1>Health and Quora use Vanta to manage risk and prove

0:00:36.090 --> 0:00:40.560
<v S1>security in real time. Get $1,000 off Vanta when you

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:48.180
<v S1>go to Vanta comm slash unsupervised. That's vanta.com/supervised for $1,000 off.

0:00:49.979 --> 0:00:53.339
<v S1>Welcome to Unsupervised Learning, a security, AI and meaning focused

0:00:53.350 --> 0:00:56.230
<v S1>podcast that looks at how best to thrive as humans

0:00:56.230 --> 0:01:00.430
<v S1>in a post AI world. It combines original ideas, analysis,

0:01:00.430 --> 0:01:03.670
<v S1>and mental models to bring not just the news, but

0:01:03.670 --> 0:01:11.319
<v S1>why it matters and how to respond. All right, welcome

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.230
<v S1>to unsupervised Learning. This is Daniel Miessler. I am in

0:01:14.230 --> 0:01:17.960
<v S1>a hotel room in Vegas recording because I have to.

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:22.250
<v S1>But it is Hacker Week and I'm here for Defcon

0:01:22.250 --> 0:01:24.830
<v S1>and Black Hat and all that good stuff, but I

0:01:24.830 --> 0:01:28.459
<v S1>wanted to get the episode out. So first note here

0:01:28.459 --> 0:01:31.220
<v S1>is that Osint is one of my favorite hobbies, and

0:01:31.220 --> 0:01:33.950
<v S1>there's something called a pizza index. That's one of my

0:01:33.950 --> 0:01:37.970
<v S1>favorite examples of this, which is how much pizza essentially

0:01:37.970 --> 0:01:41.390
<v S1>the neighborhood around the Pentagon is ordering, which really means

0:01:41.390 --> 0:01:44.940
<v S1>the Pentagon. And there's another index related to that, which

0:01:44.940 --> 0:01:48.480
<v S1>is how many people are in the bars and this

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:53.610
<v S1>person real. Ben Geller posted a tweet about this. And

0:01:53.610 --> 0:01:57.210
<v S1>essentially it says it shows that the people in the

0:01:57.210 --> 0:02:01.440
<v S1>bars is like extremely low and the pizza meter is

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:04.560
<v S1>off the charts. And I just love this so much

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:08.920
<v S1>because it indicates pretty strongly that something is about to

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:10.870
<v S1>go down. And I've got a friend who used to

0:02:10.870 --> 0:02:13.870
<v S1>be an analyst at the Pentagon, and he says, this

0:02:13.870 --> 0:02:16.990
<v S1>is absolutely true. When people are ordering in pizza and

0:02:16.990 --> 0:02:20.619
<v S1>nobody's going home, it's obviously because something is going down.

0:02:20.620 --> 0:02:22.840
<v S1>And in this case, we kind of know what's going down,

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:27.100
<v S1>which is Iran is preparing to attack Israel and or

0:02:27.100 --> 0:02:31.130
<v S1>whoever else. So that's what that is. But definitely check

0:02:31.130 --> 0:02:34.100
<v S1>out this tweet. It's pretty interesting. So this is also

0:02:34.100 --> 0:02:37.220
<v S1>why I can't wait to fully build out my agent framework,

0:02:37.220 --> 0:02:41.090
<v S1>and for agent framework to become more tightly integrated with

0:02:41.090 --> 0:02:44.030
<v S1>models and platforms, because it's going to allow a lot

0:02:44.030 --> 0:02:46.550
<v S1>more people to do things like this. What I love

0:02:46.550 --> 0:02:50.480
<v S1>about it is you could track all the different experts, right?

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:52.250
<v S1>I'm going to use a whole bunch of different stuff

0:02:52.250 --> 0:02:55.200
<v S1>for this, but there will be some agent functionality in

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:58.920
<v S1>the middle to sort of handle, like orchestration and summarization

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.650
<v S1>and creating like an Intel report. But I love the

0:03:01.650 --> 0:03:08.130
<v S1>idea of like gathering all these individual, hopefully standalone intelligence sources,

0:03:08.130 --> 0:03:12.780
<v S1>aggregating them together, but also keeping them separate and then

0:03:12.780 --> 0:03:16.920
<v S1>triangulating on truth based on that. And I heard some

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:20.320
<v S1>pretty cool ideas from, um, it was actually a friend

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:23.709
<v S1>of mine named John, uh, who was talking about how

0:03:23.710 --> 0:03:26.350
<v S1>you want to rate those different sources in different ways.

0:03:26.350 --> 0:03:29.260
<v S1>One way to rate them is to rate them based

0:03:29.260 --> 0:03:33.280
<v S1>on their difference and their uniqueness of ideas relative to

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.980
<v S1>other people, because you don't know if they're actually just

0:03:35.980 --> 0:03:39.670
<v S1>reading other people's Intel and following along, and you don't

0:03:39.670 --> 0:03:42.310
<v S1>want to use eight of those people who are all

0:03:42.310 --> 0:03:46.820
<v S1>following the same thing as eight different ends, right? Eight

0:03:46.820 --> 0:03:51.170
<v S1>different sources of of data or sources of signal. So

0:03:51.170 --> 0:03:53.300
<v S1>there's a whole bunch of cool stuff that you could

0:03:53.300 --> 0:03:56.480
<v S1>do once you have the discrete signal coming in from

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.270
<v S1>all these different places. And then you could factor in

0:03:59.270 --> 0:04:02.960
<v S1>things like prediction markets and stuff like that and just, uh,

0:04:03.350 --> 0:04:05.840
<v S1>lots of different stuff you could do. But ultimately what

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:09.570
<v S1>I want is a daily Intel report, which is as

0:04:09.570 --> 0:04:12.030
<v S1>good or better than what you would get from, like

0:04:12.030 --> 0:04:15.360
<v S1>Stratfor back in the day. Or you know what a

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:19.230
<v S1>lot of these paid platforms would do. Um, or even like,

0:04:19.230 --> 0:04:21.869
<v S1>you know, a high level government thing, I think we

0:04:21.870 --> 0:04:26.760
<v S1>could build something really, really good that leverages the intelligence

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.610
<v S1>of all these different, really smart people who are posting

0:04:29.610 --> 0:04:31.920
<v S1>their stuff online. We're not talking about private stuff. We're

0:04:31.930 --> 0:04:35.560
<v S1>talking about people on Twitter. We're talking about people on

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:39.640
<v S1>different platforms, blogs. They're writing their stuff out there. And

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:42.039
<v S1>a lot of times nobody's reading it. But if you

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:44.200
<v S1>put the effort in, you could find all those signals

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:48.490
<v S1>and start triangulating. So really excited about that. Okay. The

0:04:48.490 --> 0:04:52.330
<v S1>state of things. Yeah. I wrote a long piece about, uh,

0:04:52.330 --> 0:04:55.359
<v S1>this is I posted it on X, a fairly long piece.

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:57.470
<v S1>I should probably turn it into a full blog, but

0:04:57.470 --> 0:05:01.310
<v S1>it's a little bit, uh, long winded and it's got

0:05:01.310 --> 0:05:02.900
<v S1>some politics in it, so I think I'm going to

0:05:02.900 --> 0:05:06.770
<v S1>skip it, but I recommend going and checking it out

0:05:06.770 --> 0:05:09.260
<v S1>if you're into that kind of stuff. And I spoke

0:05:09.260 --> 0:05:14.180
<v S1>with Christine Gadsby, the head of product security operations at BlackBerry,

0:05:14.180 --> 0:05:16.970
<v S1>and we talked about the role of AI in cybersecurity

0:05:16.970 --> 0:05:20.240
<v S1>and a whole bunch of different topics. The topic list

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:23.970
<v S1>for this episode is quite large and you should absolutely

0:05:23.970 --> 0:05:26.640
<v S1>check it out. Um, so so go check that out

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:28.679
<v S1>on the YouTube or you can click it in the

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:32.609
<v S1>newsletter as well. So for security, two critical ServiceNow vulnerabilities

0:05:32.610 --> 0:05:36.870
<v S1>were reported by Asset Note company has reportedly paid a

0:05:36.870 --> 0:05:40.620
<v S1>new record high 75 million to a ransomware group. And

0:05:40.620 --> 0:05:42.839
<v S1>that seems like a lot of money. But it's not

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:44.979
<v S1>a lot compared to not being able to do business

0:05:44.980 --> 0:05:47.110
<v S1>at all. So a lot of people kind of beat

0:05:47.110 --> 0:05:50.440
<v S1>up people for paying ransoms. And it really is kind

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:52.990
<v S1>of similar to like, your kid gets stolen. It's like

0:05:52.990 --> 0:05:56.800
<v S1>all the philosophy goes away when somebody has your kid

0:05:56.800 --> 0:06:00.040
<v S1>and it's the same as a CEO or whoever. When

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:01.960
<v S1>you have the ability to pay some money and get

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:05.680
<v S1>business back online, sure, they might just ransom you again. Sure,

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.470
<v S1>they might do whatever. Sure, it might be bad for

0:06:08.470 --> 0:06:12.830
<v S1>other people. But when business has stopped, things become quite

0:06:12.830 --> 0:06:15.830
<v S1>clear to you in terms of what you need to do.

0:06:15.830 --> 0:06:19.460
<v S1>So I'm not saying people should pay or anything like that.

0:06:19.460 --> 0:06:22.310
<v S1>I'm not making any judgments. I'm just saying, well, essentially

0:06:22.310 --> 0:06:26.030
<v S1>that don't make judgments. Try to avoid making judgments because

0:06:26.029 --> 0:06:28.580
<v S1>it's really hard to be in that position. Digicert is

0:06:28.580 --> 0:06:34.529
<v S1>revoking 83,000 TLS certificates due to a domain validation bug.

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:37.830
<v S1>China is getting around US bans on advanced AI chips

0:06:37.830 --> 0:06:42.900
<v S1>through smuggling front companies and loopholes, basically finding ways to

0:06:42.900 --> 0:06:45.720
<v S1>get the chips that are not supposed to be getting.

0:06:45.750 --> 0:06:49.170
<v S1>Ransomware attacks are rising, with an 18% year on year

0:06:49.170 --> 0:06:54.089
<v S1>increase reported by Zscaler, and I've always considered ransomware attacks

0:06:54.089 --> 0:06:57.180
<v S1>to be something that we'd have to invent as a government.

0:06:57.180 --> 0:06:59.290
<v S1>It would have to be like a government service if

0:06:59.290 --> 0:07:01.720
<v S1>if it didn't exist in the marketplace, like as a

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:04.690
<v S1>way to test for bad security. And maybe you give

0:07:04.690 --> 0:07:07.510
<v S1>like a fine or something if people keep having the mistake.

0:07:07.510 --> 0:07:10.390
<v S1>But my intuition was that after a number of years

0:07:10.390 --> 0:07:13.780
<v S1>that we'd get harder and harder because security would increase.

0:07:13.780 --> 0:07:16.989
<v S1>So if these attacks are still increasing, I wonder what

0:07:16.990 --> 0:07:20.380
<v S1>the reason is. Is it because attackers are moving to

0:07:20.380 --> 0:07:23.180
<v S1>like the more vulnerable targets, or are they just getting

0:07:23.180 --> 0:07:26.150
<v S1>better at finding the holes or something else? Or all

0:07:26.150 --> 0:07:28.429
<v S1>of the above? Probably all of the above. But if

0:07:28.430 --> 0:07:32.180
<v S1>somebody has more insight on why things aren't getting tighter

0:07:32.180 --> 0:07:34.790
<v S1>or see, that's the trick is it doesn't mean things

0:07:34.790 --> 0:07:37.310
<v S1>aren't getting harder. Just because the number of attacks are

0:07:37.310 --> 0:07:40.610
<v S1>going up doesn't mean things aren't getting harder. They might

0:07:40.610 --> 0:07:43.310
<v S1>just be getting better faster. Got a great analysis here

0:07:43.310 --> 0:07:47.730
<v S1>of securing secrets in AWS. So the blog post discussing

0:07:47.730 --> 0:07:51.420
<v S1>creating custom implants for evasion by building them in C

0:07:51.450 --> 0:07:55.770
<v S1>and this thing details server setup, client functionality, and testing

0:07:55.770 --> 0:07:59.160
<v S1>against security tools. The average cost of a data breach

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:04.680
<v S1>jumped 10% to 4.88 million in 23. China is tightening

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:09.270
<v S1>its civilian drone export rules starting September 1st to prevent

0:08:09.270 --> 0:08:13.040
<v S1>use in military or terrorist activities. Yeah, I'm trying to

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:17.060
<v S1>figure out if this is CCP trying to keep it

0:08:17.060 --> 0:08:20.450
<v S1>their stuff from being used against them, or if they're

0:08:20.450 --> 0:08:25.220
<v S1>trying to make it easier to sell their products because

0:08:25.220 --> 0:08:29.330
<v S1>they're playing nice and they're appearing to be good guys.

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:33.050
<v S1>AI and tech open AI has started rolling out its

0:08:33.050 --> 0:08:37.820
<v S1>new ChatGPT voice feature for ChatGPT plus users, and it's

0:08:37.820 --> 0:08:40.189
<v S1>quite good. It's it's quite a bit different. You can

0:08:40.190 --> 0:08:43.190
<v S1>basically interrupt it. It sounds a lot more natural. I

0:08:43.190 --> 0:08:45.860
<v S1>am getting a lot of voice artifacts though, like it'll

0:08:45.860 --> 0:08:49.310
<v S1>sound like choppy and broken and a lot of weird pauses.

0:08:49.309 --> 0:08:51.350
<v S1>Not like in a human way, but I think the

0:08:51.350 --> 0:08:54.260
<v S1>platform might be overwhelmed. Or maybe, I don't know, maybe

0:08:54.260 --> 0:08:56.510
<v S1>I need to restart the app. Maybe it was buggy.

0:08:56.510 --> 0:09:00.270
<v S1>Not sure. Lots of AI talk at Blackhat, which, uh, yeah,

0:09:00.270 --> 0:09:02.910
<v S1>already here and it's already happening. Um, another thing to

0:09:02.910 --> 0:09:06.330
<v S1>mention about the ChatGPT stuff is, uh, Greg Brockman is

0:09:06.330 --> 0:09:11.340
<v S1>taking a sabbatical. Uh, John Schulman, I think, is leaving

0:09:11.340 --> 0:09:14.640
<v S1>the company. Is he the one that went to to anthropic?

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:17.969
<v S1>I can't remember. Another leader went to anthropic and another

0:09:17.970 --> 0:09:20.550
<v S1>one left as well. So the three people left all

0:09:20.550 --> 0:09:24.880
<v S1>at once. But it's not like a mass exodus all

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:28.420
<v S1>to one place they're not mad at. OpenAI seems to

0:09:28.420 --> 0:09:31.450
<v S1>be fairly benign. Um, but it does look kind of

0:09:31.450 --> 0:09:33.640
<v S1>weird to have an announcement where three people leave at

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.160
<v S1>the same time. A funniest joke I saw about this

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:39.130
<v S1>was that Sam Altman predicted that soon there would be

0:09:39.130 --> 0:09:43.390
<v S1>a one person unicorn company, and the joke was, yeah,

0:09:43.390 --> 0:09:45.820
<v S1>it might be your company. You might be the only

0:09:45.820 --> 0:09:48.680
<v S1>one left. Um, I thought that was kind of clever.

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:54.380
<v S1>California's SB 1047 safe and secure innovation for Frontier Artificial

0:09:54.380 --> 0:09:57.740
<v S1>Intelligence Models Act. That's a long name. It's looking to

0:09:57.740 --> 0:10:01.970
<v S1>regulate large AI models by mandating safety features to prevent

0:10:01.970 --> 0:10:08.660
<v S1>catastrophic incidents. Use risk based AI regulation began on August 1st,

0:10:08.660 --> 0:10:13.140
<v S1>and it's got staggered deadlines based on low or no

0:10:13.140 --> 0:10:17.160
<v S1>risk versus high risk and limited risk tiers. So that's

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.370
<v S1>starting to roll out. And OpenAI has launched the GPT

0:10:20.370 --> 0:10:24.569
<v S1>four long output model. I've already switched all or at

0:10:24.570 --> 0:10:27.270
<v S1>least a lot of my stuff. I switched my fabric

0:10:27.270 --> 0:10:31.740
<v S1>prompt over to this. So it's got 64 output tokens,

0:10:31.740 --> 0:10:36.370
<v S1>64,000 output tokens, which is 16 times more than the

0:10:36.370 --> 0:10:41.290
<v S1>previous one, and it's 50% cheaper for most things. And

0:10:41.290 --> 0:10:43.479
<v S1>a lot of people are saying that the benchmarks, it's

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:46.420
<v S1>actually much better than the previous one. So I consider

0:10:46.420 --> 0:10:50.110
<v S1>it just a straight across upgrade plus being cheaper. So yeah,

0:10:50.110 --> 0:10:54.670
<v S1>I already made that change. Google's experimental Gemini 1.5 Pro

0:10:54.670 --> 0:10:58.780
<v S1>has claimed top spot on a bunch of leaderboards, surpassing

0:10:58.780 --> 0:11:03.740
<v S1>GPT four and, uh, sonnet 35 with a score of 1300.

0:11:03.770 --> 0:11:06.290
<v S1>I've not used it yet, because every time I try

0:11:06.290 --> 0:11:08.990
<v S1>to use a Google product, I have to vomit. But

0:11:08.990 --> 0:11:11.810
<v S1>I am going to try again soon to see, uh,

0:11:11.990 --> 0:11:14.810
<v S1>if it's usable. Meta says it'll need ten times more

0:11:14.809 --> 0:11:18.260
<v S1>computing power to train llama four compared to llama three.

0:11:18.290 --> 0:11:22.220
<v S1>Elliott Management is calling Nvidia a bubble and says AI

0:11:22.220 --> 0:11:25.650
<v S1>is overhyped. They mark. They argue that the market is

0:11:25.650 --> 0:11:29.880
<v S1>overly optimistic about AI's potential and Nvidia's role in it.

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:31.980
<v S1>I think it's a bubble, but it's a bubble like

0:11:31.980 --> 0:11:36.059
<v S1>the internet in 1995. In other words, there absolutely will

0:11:36.059 --> 0:11:39.030
<v S1>be a burst of lots and lots of companies, right?

0:11:39.030 --> 0:11:44.160
<v S1>Pets.com and companies like that, the AI equivalents, thousands of

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:47.280
<v S1>those companies are going to fail. Lots of investors are

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:49.630
<v S1>going to be very sad about this, but that's completely

0:11:49.630 --> 0:11:52.930
<v S1>unrelated to what AI is up is about to do

0:11:52.929 --> 0:11:55.270
<v S1>to the world. Right? So I think people shouldn't be

0:11:55.270 --> 0:11:57.970
<v S1>confused about those two things. One happening doesn't mean that

0:11:57.970 --> 0:12:00.490
<v S1>the other one is not going to happen. Bellingcat has

0:12:00.490 --> 0:12:05.380
<v S1>put together a guide on identifying explosive ordnance in social

0:12:05.380 --> 0:12:09.850
<v S1>media imagery. CrowdStrike is facing a massive lawsuit after Blue

0:12:09.850 --> 0:12:13.610
<v S1>Friday crashed over 8 million computers globally. Intel is laying

0:12:13.610 --> 0:12:16.220
<v S1>off over 15% of its workforce as part of a

0:12:16.220 --> 0:12:20.059
<v S1>$10 billion cost reduction plan. Apple just posted a record

0:12:20.059 --> 0:12:25.219
<v S1>breaking Q3 2024, $86 billion in revenue. And one thing

0:12:25.220 --> 0:12:28.729
<v S1>that's interesting about this is Berkshire Hathaway just sold a

0:12:28.730 --> 0:12:31.130
<v S1>whole bunch of stuff, uh, a whole bunch of Apple.

0:12:31.130 --> 0:12:34.370
<v S1>And they sold it right before this crash happened. The

0:12:34.370 --> 0:12:37.220
<v S1>crash happened. There was a giant recession that hit the

0:12:37.220 --> 0:12:39.380
<v S1>United States, and then it went away the next day.

0:12:39.410 --> 0:12:45.050
<v S1>Today was like a lot of that money came back. But, um. Yeah, strange.

0:12:45.050 --> 0:12:48.740
<v S1>Who knows? It could happen again tomorrow. But very volatile,

0:12:48.740 --> 0:12:52.130
<v S1>very emotional sort of time. I feel like in lots

0:12:52.130 --> 0:12:54.440
<v S1>of different ways, and I feel like the stock market

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:57.500
<v S1>is matching that. But, uh, the other thing to mention

0:12:57.500 --> 0:13:02.250
<v S1>about Apple is that their services money is now almost

0:13:02.250 --> 0:13:05.910
<v S1>equal to their devices money, which is a huge tipping

0:13:05.910 --> 0:13:09.959
<v S1>point or a milestone in terms of their growth. Apple

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.199
<v S1>is ramping up spending to get Apple intelligence ready for

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:16.830
<v S1>launch in the fall. I'm already using the beta, and

0:13:16.830 --> 0:13:19.080
<v S1>it's pretty impressive, even though a lot of the features

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:22.170
<v S1>aren't rolled out yet. All right, human news. A lot

0:13:22.170 --> 0:13:25.140
<v S1>of the world tried to push Huawei out of their infrastructure,

0:13:25.140 --> 0:13:30.250
<v S1>but they're actually getting more successful, not less. Software company

0:13:30.250 --> 0:13:35.140
<v S1>increased user engagement by eight times by drastically shortening their emails.

0:13:35.140 --> 0:13:40.059
<v S1>Netlify fees. Is that it? Yeah. Netlify fees. Initial 150

0:13:40.059 --> 0:13:43.720
<v S1>word emails had a 1% reply rate, but by cutting

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:47.110
<v S1>the text to 37 words, it went to 4%. And

0:13:47.110 --> 0:13:50.660
<v S1>when they went to 14 words, it went to 8%

0:13:50.660 --> 0:13:54.470
<v S1>14 words. Last month, Shane Mack offered everyone at his

0:13:54.470 --> 0:13:58.160
<v S1>company $25,000 to quit and six people took it. Yeah,

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.160
<v S1>I think this is part of the Alaskan fishing boat

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:03.740
<v S1>thing that I wrote a while back. Companies basically want

0:14:03.740 --> 0:14:07.460
<v S1>fully dedicated murderers is all they want. They want people

0:14:07.460 --> 0:14:11.330
<v S1>who eat, live, sleep, think and are obsessed with the company.

0:14:11.330 --> 0:14:15.270
<v S1>That's why they want return to office. That's their way

0:14:15.270 --> 0:14:18.210
<v S1>of filtering for people who who think of the company

0:14:18.210 --> 0:14:20.700
<v S1>as a religion. I mean, they can't say that, but

0:14:20.700 --> 0:14:22.229
<v S1>they can say you have to come to the office

0:14:22.230 --> 0:14:25.500
<v S1>and that's an automatic filter for it. Right? So this

0:14:25.500 --> 0:14:28.020
<v S1>is the way that management and managers and the whole

0:14:28.020 --> 0:14:32.490
<v S1>whole system can basically look for these obsessed people, which

0:14:32.490 --> 0:14:36.420
<v S1>are likely to be in certain demographics, right? Certain ages,

0:14:36.420 --> 0:14:40.930
<v S1>you know, certain groups that are awfully likely to look

0:14:40.930 --> 0:14:44.620
<v S1>kind of similar to each other. Probably young, probably without kids,

0:14:44.620 --> 0:14:48.040
<v S1>probably male, who are just grind, grind, grind, don't care

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:51.520
<v S1>about anything else. Yeah, whatever. Work life balance don't care.

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.040
<v S1>I just want a code or whatever it is. Right.

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:57.160
<v S1>So that's what these companies are looking for more and more.

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:59.890
<v S1>And that's why I think and this is just my

0:14:59.890 --> 0:15:03.380
<v S1>hypothesis here, I don't, you know, we need more data

0:15:03.380 --> 0:15:07.940
<v S1>for all this. But my pet hypothesis here is that

0:15:07.940 --> 0:15:11.000
<v S1>this is a factor for all of these layoffs. It's

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:15.590
<v S1>like this awakening across all of business that you know

0:15:15.590 --> 0:15:21.170
<v S1>what I want hardcore crazy people, religious people about this company.

0:15:21.170 --> 0:15:23.660
<v S1>And I want them to be a-players. And I want

0:15:23.660 --> 0:15:26.720
<v S1>them to be really good at AI, and they're going

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:28.950
<v S1>to help us do even more with AI because they're

0:15:28.950 --> 0:15:31.080
<v S1>going to bring the AI on and blah, blah, blah.

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.330
<v S1>So it's like, I'm going to hire a bunch of

0:15:33.330 --> 0:15:36.570
<v S1>these crazy people, and a team of ten of them

0:15:36.570 --> 0:15:39.030
<v S1>is going to be like having a team of 1000

0:15:39.030 --> 0:15:43.080
<v S1>or 2000 people sometime in the future, in the near future.

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:44.880
<v S1>Whereas if you get a bunch of people who are

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:48.270
<v S1>just straight out of college, they're entitled. They think they

0:15:48.270 --> 0:15:51.210
<v S1>are owed something even worse. They think that they're about

0:15:51.210 --> 0:15:54.550
<v S1>to receive training on the job because they don't know

0:15:54.550 --> 0:15:57.010
<v S1>how to do the job. And it's like, okay, well,

0:15:57.010 --> 0:15:59.470
<v S1>now train me. Now, teach me how to do this job.

0:15:59.470 --> 0:16:02.500
<v S1>And all these leaders at these companies are like, I

0:16:02.500 --> 0:16:05.350
<v S1>do not want you. I don't care what degrees you have.

0:16:05.350 --> 0:16:07.810
<v S1>If you can't do the job on day one, or

0:16:07.810 --> 0:16:11.440
<v S1>you can't learn instantly, like just by seeing it once,

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:13.150
<v S1>and if you're not obsessed about it and want to

0:16:13.150 --> 0:16:16.150
<v S1>sleep under your desk, we have no use for you.

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:20.510
<v S1>And unfortunately, that's like 80% of the workforce, I'm guessing, right?

0:16:20.510 --> 0:16:24.410
<v S1>It's like 52, 90% of the workforce, let's call it that.

0:16:24.410 --> 0:16:27.920
<v S1>And what that means is they are looking for that 10%.

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:31.400
<v S1>They're looking for that 5%. They're looking for the A

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:36.320
<v S1>players who are dedicated like religious people. And I believe

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:39.620
<v S1>this is what we're seeing more than anything now. You

0:16:39.620 --> 0:16:41.910
<v S1>add AI on top of that. Now you see why

0:16:41.910 --> 0:16:43.920
<v S1>there's so many layoffs. Now you see why there's so

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:47.160
<v S1>many open positions. But nobody's hiring for them because they're

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:51.060
<v S1>kind of like fake positions. And this is multiple hypotheses

0:16:51.060 --> 0:16:54.210
<v S1>all rolled into one. But you get the vibe. This

0:16:54.210 --> 0:16:56.880
<v S1>is the basic vibe of what I think is happening.

0:16:56.880 --> 0:17:01.980
<v S1>Journalist Evan Gershkovich was among a group of Americans and

0:17:01.980 --> 0:17:06.550
<v S1>Russian dissidents released from Russia in a seven nation prisoner swap,

0:17:06.550 --> 0:17:10.389
<v S1>largest ever since the Cold War. Researchers at the University

0:17:10.390 --> 0:17:13.750
<v S1>of California, Santa Barbara have developed an AI model called

0:17:13.750 --> 0:17:17.080
<v S1>shark AI to help prevent shark attacks. The model uses

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:21.369
<v S1>drones to detect sharks with greater accuracy than humans. I

0:17:21.369 --> 0:17:24.550
<v S1>love this, I love this every time I go to Maui,

0:17:24.550 --> 0:17:27.310
<v S1>I'm stupid and I read the stats about like, shark

0:17:27.310 --> 0:17:29.780
<v S1>attacks and they're like, oh, actually, right next to you

0:17:29.780 --> 0:17:32.149
<v S1>is the most dangerous place. And I'm like, cool. I

0:17:32.150 --> 0:17:34.130
<v S1>didn't want to go in the water anyway. Why did

0:17:34.130 --> 0:17:37.040
<v S1>I read that right before I went on vacation, where

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:39.740
<v S1>I'm supposed to swim in the water? But anyway, if

0:17:39.740 --> 0:17:42.170
<v S1>I were able to look up and maybe they're so

0:17:42.170 --> 0:17:45.050
<v S1>high up you can't hear them, maybe it's not super annoying.

0:17:45.050 --> 0:17:47.750
<v S1>But anyway, if I know that there's ten of these

0:17:47.750 --> 0:17:53.000
<v S1>drones sweeping back and forth and you know they're being recharged,

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:55.530
<v S1>they go back on rotation and they look down. They

0:17:55.530 --> 0:17:58.470
<v S1>could see very clearly if there's a shark in the water,

0:17:58.470 --> 0:18:01.050
<v S1>I assume that it wouldn't work. Maybe if the water

0:18:01.050 --> 0:18:04.380
<v S1>was muddy, but maybe you wouldn't be swimming anyway because

0:18:04.380 --> 0:18:07.380
<v S1>it would be dangerous water anyway. Usually in a lot

0:18:07.380 --> 0:18:09.659
<v S1>of places you could see right through the water. It's

0:18:09.660 --> 0:18:13.560
<v S1>very easy to see a shark from above, and they

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:18.520
<v S1>just call the lifeguard station and trigger an alert, and

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:20.980
<v S1>they blow the whistle and everyone gets out of the water, like,

0:18:20.980 --> 0:18:24.130
<v S1>that's going to be amazing. Love it. Treating failing eyesight

0:18:24.130 --> 0:18:26.410
<v S1>and high cholesterol are two new ways to lower the

0:18:26.410 --> 0:18:30.130
<v S1>risk of developing dementia, according to a major report. The

0:18:30.130 --> 0:18:35.500
<v S1>Lancet Commission's latest findings suggest that addressing 14 health issues

0:18:35.500 --> 0:18:39.820
<v S1>could theoretically prevent nearly half of all dementia cases worldwide.

0:18:39.820 --> 0:18:43.040
<v S1>And I believe from reading this that essentially they're talking

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:46.550
<v S1>about things that just exacerbate it and make it worse. So,

0:18:46.550 --> 0:18:49.640
<v S1>for example, if you can't really see things, you generally

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.040
<v S1>maybe you don't go out a lot. If you can't

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:55.010
<v S1>hear conversations, you're not involved in conversations. So I think

0:18:55.010 --> 0:18:58.130
<v S1>a lot of this might be related to social interaction,

0:18:58.130 --> 0:19:01.250
<v S1>which once you start to get isolated and you're not

0:19:01.250 --> 0:19:04.400
<v S1>consuming media, you're not reading, you're not like, there's no

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.830
<v S1>new inputs. Um, again, this is my hypothesis. I believe

0:19:07.830 --> 0:19:10.109
<v S1>this is based on some solid science I've already read,

0:19:10.109 --> 0:19:13.770
<v S1>though is basically, once you get isolated in that way,

0:19:13.770 --> 0:19:17.340
<v S1>your brain starts like shutting down, and it really accelerates

0:19:17.340 --> 0:19:21.180
<v S1>the dementia. So that that would make sense if, uh,

0:19:21.180 --> 0:19:23.669
<v S1>that's what they were saying in this paper. Self control

0:19:23.670 --> 0:19:27.990
<v S1>is about 60% heritable, meaning genes explain roughly 60% of

0:19:27.990 --> 0:19:32.170
<v S1>the differences in self control among individuals. So I think

0:19:32.170 --> 0:19:34.930
<v S1>this could be devastating if it's supported in further studies.

0:19:34.930 --> 0:19:39.159
<v S1>I worry about the narrative that both IQ and self-discipline

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:43.000
<v S1>are mostly genetic, thus giving people an easy ramp to

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:46.629
<v S1>write off individuals or even groups if they have lower

0:19:46.630 --> 0:19:50.950
<v S1>averages of these things. And I think even if it

0:19:50.950 --> 0:19:55.400
<v S1>were true, the groups don't define the individuals and the

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:58.550
<v S1>study mentioned individuals here. It's not talking about groups, but

0:19:58.550 --> 0:20:01.159
<v S1>you know, people are going to people. Right? So the

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:05.210
<v S1>the other thing is there's likely a lot of slack in, say,

0:20:05.210 --> 0:20:09.260
<v S1>the 40%, which is environmental, assuming those numbers are correct,

0:20:09.260 --> 0:20:13.490
<v S1>like we're probably getting whatever, 10 or 20% of the 40%

0:20:13.490 --> 0:20:17.240
<v S1>we're supposed to be doing. So if we were to increase,

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:20.520
<v S1>you know, the efforts of, you know, training and culture

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:23.639
<v S1>and all the environmental things we can control, I think

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:27.570
<v S1>that would raise, you know, the bar for, well, everyone,

0:20:27.570 --> 0:20:30.600
<v S1>but especially the bottom quite a bit. So I'm not

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:33.570
<v S1>sure this is really anything too much to despair about

0:20:33.570 --> 0:20:37.980
<v S1>other than making it easier for certain negative narratives. A

0:20:37.980 --> 0:20:40.620
<v S1>new study reveals that people tend to alter their appearance

0:20:40.619 --> 0:20:44.899
<v S1>to match their names. Researchers found that adults faces often

0:20:44.900 --> 0:20:49.400
<v S1>align with a social stereotype associated with their name, while

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:52.790
<v S1>children's faces do not show this pattern. A key protein

0:20:52.790 --> 0:20:56.720
<v S1>called reelin may help stave off Alzheimer's disease. A number

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:59.720
<v S1>of new studies suggest that reelin helps maintain thinking and

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:04.639
<v S1>memory in aging brains, and when its levels fall off,

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:08.689
<v S1>neurons become more vulnerable and people are starting to obviously

0:21:08.690 --> 0:21:11.780
<v S1>work on drugs for this. Wizards of the coast will

0:21:11.780 --> 0:21:16.910
<v S1>release the 2024 Dungeons and Dragons rulebooks under a Creative

0:21:16.910 --> 0:21:21.200
<v S1>Commons license, which is fulfilling a promise they made after

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:24.440
<v S1>the backlash over attempts to change the Open Gaming License.

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.950
<v S1>If novelists wrote Your bug Reports imagines how famous authors

0:21:27.950 --> 0:21:32.100
<v S1>would describe software bugs in their unique styles, Ernest Klein

0:21:32.100 --> 0:21:35.100
<v S1>likens a screen flicker to scenes from back to the

0:21:35.100 --> 0:21:40.590
<v S1>Future and Ghostbusters, while Ursula K Le Guin philosophizes about

0:21:40.590 --> 0:21:45.540
<v S1>the existential pain of coding errors. Ideas. More analysis on

0:21:45.540 --> 0:21:48.870
<v S1>how bad the results were of the recent UBI study

0:21:48.869 --> 0:21:52.950
<v S1>done by Sam Altman. It looks pretty bad, just like

0:21:52.950 --> 0:21:55.859
<v S1>we talked about last week, and got a link here

0:21:55.869 --> 0:21:58.629
<v S1>to go into that in depth. And really cool idea

0:21:58.630 --> 0:22:02.950
<v S1>from Jonathan Hite about free range kids. And a cool

0:22:02.950 --> 0:22:06.400
<v S1>idea for giving them freedom is to create a play

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:08.919
<v S1>street once a month where you close off a street

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:12.550
<v S1>for two hours, give time for kids to play in

0:22:12.550 --> 0:22:15.699
<v S1>the street safely, and then the whole time that the

0:22:15.700 --> 0:22:20.170
<v S1>parents are there watching, like around the edges and, you know, whatever.

0:22:20.180 --> 0:22:23.060
<v S1>But the neighbors are also meeting and talking, and he's

0:22:23.060 --> 0:22:27.320
<v S1>saying it has transformative effects on the neighborhood and just

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:30.470
<v S1>good times all around. I really love ideas like this.

0:22:30.470 --> 0:22:34.100
<v S1>Discovery Farmbot is an open source farming machine for growing

0:22:34.130 --> 0:22:37.250
<v S1>food in your own backyard. Super memory an AI powered

0:22:37.250 --> 0:22:41.600
<v S1>platform to organize, search and utilize saved information acting as

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:47.190
<v S1>a digital second brain. Friend is Avi Schiffman's new AI pendant,

0:22:47.190 --> 0:22:51.030
<v S1>and it's designed to combat loneliness by sending you reassuring

0:22:51.030 --> 0:22:56.310
<v S1>or playful text based on what it overhears so it

0:22:56.310 --> 0:22:59.730
<v S1>doesn't have a speaker. It actually sends you notifications. Kind

0:22:59.730 --> 0:23:02.760
<v S1>of interesting way to do that. Daniel Kosman walks you

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:07.830
<v S1>through installing fabric and open source AI framework by Daniel Missler.

0:23:07.859 --> 0:23:10.540
<v S1>That's weird. I wonder if I wrote that because I

0:23:10.540 --> 0:23:13.060
<v S1>don't talk about myself in the third person. Fleet is

0:23:13.060 --> 0:23:15.970
<v S1>an open source version of fleet DMs tool built on

0:23:15.970 --> 0:23:22.270
<v S1>OS query for vulnerability monitoring, MDM detection engineering and more.

0:23:22.270 --> 0:23:27.460
<v S1>Soc2 policy Templates collection of templates for Soc2 policies and procedures.

0:23:27.460 --> 0:23:32.020
<v S1>Clutch security is a platform providing visibility into all non-human

0:23:32.020 --> 0:23:38.610
<v S1>identities within an organization, helping them identify associated risks and

0:23:38.609 --> 0:23:41.250
<v S1>the recommendation of the week. If you're at Blackhat this week,

0:23:41.250 --> 0:23:44.160
<v S1>remember that ten and 20 years from now, you will

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:47.070
<v S1>not remember the talks that you saw this year, but

0:23:47.070 --> 0:23:50.970
<v S1>you will remember spending that time with your friends. So

0:23:50.970 --> 0:23:55.590
<v S1>prioritize friend time over presentation time. Not only is the

0:23:55.590 --> 0:23:58.620
<v S1>friend time more precious and valuable, but you can get

0:23:58.619 --> 0:24:00.959
<v S1>the talks later if you really want to. And the

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:03.570
<v S1>aphorism of the week friends show their love in times

0:24:03.570 --> 0:24:07.320
<v S1>of trouble, not in happiness. Friends show their love in

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:14.760
<v S1>times of trouble, not in happiness. Euripides. Unsupervised learning is

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:17.880
<v S1>produced and edited by Daniel Miller on a Neumann U87

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:21.970
<v S1>AI microphone using Hindenburg. Intro and outro music is by

0:24:21.970 --> 0:24:25.179
<v S1>Zomby with the Y, and to get the text and

0:24:25.180 --> 0:24:27.550
<v S1>links from this episode, sign up for the newsletter version

0:24:27.550 --> 0:24:33.190
<v S1>of the show at Daniel miessler.com/newsletter. We'll see you next time.