WEBVTT - A Conversation with with Abhishek Agrawal from Material Security

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.050
<v S1>All right, Abhishek, welcome to unsupervised Learning.

0:00:03.050 --> 0:00:05.540
<v S2>Yeah, thanks for having me. Excited to be here.

0:00:05.870 --> 0:00:11.090
<v S1>Yeah. Awesome. So, uh, you are Abhishek Agarwal and co-founder

0:00:11.090 --> 0:00:14.360
<v S1>and CEO at Material Security. Is that correct?

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:15.230
<v S2>That's right.

0:00:15.890 --> 0:00:20.180
<v S1>Awesome. Well, tell me about your background and, uh, the

0:00:20.180 --> 0:00:22.700
<v S1>product and just, uh, get us started here.

0:00:22.700 --> 0:00:25.940
<v S2>Yeah, sure. Happy to. Um, yeah. So I'm Abhishek, um,

0:00:25.940 --> 0:00:28.880
<v S2>one of the co-founders of material. Um, before this company,

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:31.490
<v S2>I was an early PM at Dropbox, uh, where I

0:00:31.490 --> 0:00:35.270
<v S2>spent time on the data infrastructure side and the cert side, um,

0:00:35.270 --> 0:00:38.570
<v S2>when the company was fairly early. So around 250 people.

0:00:38.570 --> 0:00:40.669
<v S2>I was, uh, an early PM there, like I said.

0:00:40.670 --> 0:00:43.879
<v S2>And then before that, uh, got my start on the

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:47.030
<v S2>Microsoft at Microsoft Research on the engineering side. So my

0:00:47.030 --> 0:00:49.310
<v S2>background before this company was actually more in like the

0:00:49.310 --> 0:00:53.000
<v S2>productivity and sort of large data sets, side and data

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:56.959
<v S2>data infrastructure. Um, with this company obviously kind of first

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:59.990
<v S2>foray into security, although at Dropbox, the security team would

0:00:59.990 --> 0:01:02.090
<v S2>use our data infrastructure quite a bit. So I had

0:01:02.090 --> 0:01:05.660
<v S2>some interaction with them. Um, and yeah, material. You know,

0:01:05.660 --> 0:01:08.059
<v S2>we started a while ago, we're kind of in the

0:01:08.060 --> 0:01:11.810
<v S2>email security space, uh, where we're now broadening a little

0:01:11.810 --> 0:01:16.160
<v S2>bit more to the productivity suite more broadly, more generally. But, uh,

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:18.709
<v S2>the kind of key insight that led to the company,

0:01:18.709 --> 0:01:22.190
<v S2>which actually got started after the 2016 election cycle, where

0:01:22.190 --> 0:01:24.830
<v S2>there were a couple high profile email attacks. Uh, the

0:01:24.830 --> 0:01:28.400
<v S2>key insight was everybody's really obsessed with trying to stop

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:32.030
<v S2>someone from getting into email. But but we had this

0:01:32.030 --> 0:01:33.950
<v S2>idea which was like, if someone does get into an

0:01:33.950 --> 0:01:37.040
<v S2>email account, there's all these downstream things that they can do.

0:01:37.069 --> 0:01:39.830
<v S2>What if we could contain that blast radius? Uh, so

0:01:39.830 --> 0:01:41.720
<v S2>that was the original insight that led to the company

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:43.910
<v S2>and a lot of what we still do today. And

0:01:43.910 --> 0:01:45.710
<v S2>then we also do a kind of more of the

0:01:45.709 --> 0:01:48.680
<v S2>traditional email security of trying to, you know, stop attacks

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:53.060
<v S2>that that are still bypassing, um, uh, sort of gateways and,

0:01:53.060 --> 0:01:53.930
<v S2>and the like.

0:01:55.420 --> 0:01:59.470
<v S1>Yeah. Interesting. The the front page says, uh, secure email

0:01:59.470 --> 0:02:02.920
<v S1>from every angle, which is pretty interesting. I thought that

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:05.200
<v S1>was that was a good tagline.

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:05.770
<v S3>Thank you.

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:09.609
<v S1>Yeah. So I looked at your background as well. So

0:02:09.730 --> 0:02:12.520
<v S1>I'm surprised we haven't run into each other more. Uh,

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:14.649
<v S1>you're also in the Bay area as well?

0:02:14.650 --> 0:02:17.620
<v S2>I am, yeah. So I moved out here for Dropbox

0:02:17.620 --> 0:02:20.020
<v S2>and then, uh, has been kind of bouncing around the

0:02:20.020 --> 0:02:23.950
<v S2>Bay area, uh, for the last decade now, so. Yeah.

0:02:24.430 --> 0:02:27.100
<v S1>Nice. Yeah. We should get coffee at some point. Let's

0:02:27.100 --> 0:02:29.440
<v S1>do it for sure. I'm just in Newark, so.

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:31.930
<v S2>Oh. No way. Okay, I'm really close to you. I'm

0:02:31.930 --> 0:02:34.930
<v S2>in Walnut Creek, so, uh. Oh. Nice. Not not not

0:02:34.930 --> 0:02:37.059
<v S2>just in the Bay area, but nearby. Yeah.

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:43.239
<v S1>Awesome. Yeah. So, uh, why do product managers make such

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:48.160
<v S1>good CEOs and co-founders? Because I know you started in engineering,

0:02:48.430 --> 0:02:51.490
<v S1>but you did a decent amount of time as a

0:02:51.490 --> 0:02:55.239
<v S1>product manager. Yeah. What do you think they're so good at? Like,

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:58.000
<v S1>starting and building and pushing products.

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.930
<v S2>Yeah. It's a great question. Um. First of all. I mean,

0:03:02.930 --> 0:03:05.269
<v S2>I think that like, you know, I'm a big believer

0:03:05.270 --> 0:03:07.760
<v S2>there's like multiple paths to God. So like, you know,

0:03:08.090 --> 0:03:10.130
<v S2>there is no kind of one template, like a lot

0:03:10.130 --> 0:03:13.820
<v S2>of different profiles, uh, folks, uh, can start companies and

0:03:13.820 --> 0:03:16.760
<v S2>make great, uh, founders or CEOs. I think the reason

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:21.350
<v S2>you see product managers kind of maybe overrepresented there is

0:03:21.350 --> 0:03:25.190
<v S2>that by definition, product management is kind of a, um,

0:03:25.190 --> 0:03:30.020
<v S2>generalist function. You know, like you're at this intersection of engineering, uh,

0:03:30.020 --> 0:03:33.380
<v S2>design business. Uh, that's kind of your job as a

0:03:33.380 --> 0:03:35.990
<v S2>product manager. And so if you take that kind of

0:03:35.990 --> 0:03:38.030
<v S2>elevate that, like, that's kind of what you're doing as

0:03:38.030 --> 0:03:40.460
<v S2>a founder, you know, you're like thinking about what to build.

0:03:40.460 --> 0:03:41.930
<v S2>You're thinking about how you're going to sell it, take

0:03:41.930 --> 0:03:45.050
<v S2>it to market. You're thinking about, um, how it's going

0:03:45.050 --> 0:03:47.360
<v S2>to work, but also how you're going to message it.

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:50.360
<v S2>And so a lot of these kind of activities are

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:54.320
<v S2>what PMS are doing inside companies for their products. You're

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:56.090
<v S2>kind of doing that for your whole company as a

0:03:56.090 --> 0:03:59.330
<v S2>founder when you're when you're, uh, CEO or founder. So

0:03:59.330 --> 0:04:02.060
<v S2>I think that's maybe why PMS are attracted to it. Um,

0:04:02.060 --> 0:04:05.060
<v S2>in my case personally, you know, I just kind of

0:04:05.060 --> 0:04:07.190
<v S2>when I was an engineer, I would really be kind

0:04:07.190 --> 0:04:09.530
<v S2>of missing having an input into what the product should

0:04:09.530 --> 0:04:11.690
<v S2>be and how it should work and who the customer

0:04:11.690 --> 0:04:13.730
<v S2>should be. Then when I became a PM, I was

0:04:13.730 --> 0:04:16.370
<v S2>really missing, like writing code. So I was kind of like,

0:04:16.370 --> 0:04:19.070
<v S2>never really happy in one role or the other. Uh,

0:04:19.070 --> 0:04:22.130
<v S2>and that also makes for a great trait for founders

0:04:22.130 --> 0:04:24.350
<v S2>that are just kind of not satisfied with being in

0:04:24.350 --> 0:04:27.619
<v S2>any one specific role. They just kind of want to like, uh,

0:04:27.620 --> 0:04:29.719
<v S2>be a little bit of jack of all trades. Uh,

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.750
<v S2>so yeah, I think that's why. But I'm not sure.

0:04:33.110 --> 0:04:36.470
<v S1>Yeah, I think that sounds right. I mean, I actually

0:04:36.470 --> 0:04:39.860
<v S1>think with all this AI stuff happening, a lot of

0:04:39.860 --> 0:04:42.169
<v S1>product managers are going to be like, you know what,

0:04:42.170 --> 0:04:43.940
<v S1>screw this. And they're just going to break off and

0:04:43.940 --> 0:04:46.729
<v S1>like build their own companies. Yeah. And have a little

0:04:46.730 --> 0:04:48.830
<v S1>bit of dev support. But even be able to do

0:04:48.830 --> 0:04:53.390
<v S1>like MVP's themselves if they're technical. Yeah. And then be

0:04:53.390 --> 0:04:55.460
<v S1>able to do a lot of the marketing themselves, a

0:04:55.460 --> 0:04:58.469
<v S1>lot of the user stories and like. It's like a

0:04:58.470 --> 0:05:01.320
<v S1>one person company, essentially.

0:05:01.770 --> 0:05:03.840
<v S2>Yeah, I think that's actually one of the most exciting

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:06.630
<v S2>things about all of this stuff. And I know several

0:05:06.630 --> 0:05:09.960
<v S2>folks have kind of written about this, but the whole like,

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:12.719
<v S2>when will we see the first, like, you know, billion

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.390
<v S2>dollar company that's just got one employee? That's a very,

0:05:15.390 --> 0:05:19.380
<v S2>very intriguing idea. And I think that is you're totally right. Um,

0:05:19.380 --> 0:05:21.989
<v S2>that and again, I don't think it has to be

0:05:21.990 --> 0:05:25.260
<v S2>just product managers like anyone that can kind of like

0:05:25.410 --> 0:05:28.469
<v S2>complement whatever skill set they have with, with a lot

0:05:28.470 --> 0:05:30.630
<v S2>of that other stuff is going to be in a

0:05:30.630 --> 0:05:34.349
<v S2>position to really get pretty far with, without, maybe not

0:05:34.380 --> 0:05:37.650
<v S2>with literally just one person, but with a pretty small team. Um.

0:05:38.130 --> 0:05:40.260
<v S1>Yeah. And I think it goes back to what you said,

0:05:40.260 --> 0:05:44.250
<v S1>which is, uh, being able to link these different things.

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:48.240
<v S1>It's like it's almost like the opposite of Google. And

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.039
<v S1>I know some people at Google, so I don't want

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:53.430
<v S1>to be too mean here. But like Google in general

0:05:53.430 --> 0:05:58.820
<v S1>is almost like engineering focused. Where as opposed to product

0:05:58.820 --> 0:06:02.750
<v S1>or problem focused. Hmm. Yeah. And so they they have

0:06:02.750 --> 0:06:04.970
<v S1>all this tech that they build, they come out with

0:06:04.970 --> 0:06:08.089
<v S1>the attention is all you need paper. Yeah, yeah. And

0:06:08.089 --> 0:06:11.210
<v S1>people just throw random things at the wall. And there's

0:06:11.210 --> 0:06:15.680
<v S1>not a product management led thing of like, problem solution,

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:19.430
<v S1>really good marketing that makes it clear and then make

0:06:19.430 --> 0:06:22.670
<v S1>and then also product management making it easy to use.

0:06:22.670 --> 0:06:23.450
<v S2>Totally.

0:06:23.450 --> 0:06:26.990
<v S1>It's like so hard to use like Google stuff like, um,

0:06:26.990 --> 0:06:31.279
<v S1>Google Eye Studio compared to Claude or one of these

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:33.980
<v S1>other products. It's like impenetrable.

0:06:33.980 --> 0:06:37.580
<v S2>Yeah. Um, no, I agree, I, you know, my favorite

0:06:37.580 --> 0:06:39.890
<v S2>kind of recent example of this is that they, they

0:06:39.890 --> 0:06:44.360
<v S2>launched a thing recently for Google Drive in the workspace setting,

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:48.080
<v S2>where they will use an LLM to auto classify sensitive

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.320
<v S2>content in your drive, which is pretty cool. Uh, to

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:54.890
<v S2>like auto label it. Um, but but the way you

0:06:54.890 --> 0:06:56.420
<v S2>have to set it up is like, you literally have

0:06:56.420 --> 0:06:59.360
<v S2>to go as a workspace admin and like basically train

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.720
<v S2>a model yourself. And I was like, oh my God. Like,

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.570
<v S2>you know, like most of these security folks or IT

0:07:05.570 --> 0:07:07.580
<v S2>admins be talked to like they're they're not going to

0:07:07.580 --> 0:07:10.160
<v S2>have time to go do that and like back test

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:12.830
<v S2>it and make sure the precision and stuff is good. Like,

0:07:12.830 --> 0:07:15.260
<v S2>you know, you would expect that to be more kind

0:07:15.260 --> 0:07:19.640
<v S2>of one, one, one click. But yeah, I think um,

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:21.530
<v S2>I think the other thing is that we talk a

0:07:21.530 --> 0:07:25.790
<v S2>lot about product management in the Valley. But for me personally,

0:07:25.790 --> 0:07:29.540
<v S2>and I've talked about this before, uh, on another podcast, like,

0:07:29.540 --> 0:07:33.230
<v S2>especially as a founder early on, I think learning about

0:07:33.230 --> 0:07:37.220
<v S2>product marketing is very, very important because, yes, because half

0:07:37.220 --> 0:07:39.080
<v S2>of what you were just saying is, um, it is

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:41.780
<v S2>part of a product managers kind of responsibility, but it's

0:07:41.900 --> 0:07:45.230
<v S2>honestly it's product marketing. It's like, well, like, what is

0:07:45.230 --> 0:07:47.450
<v S2>this going to thing going to be like, what features

0:07:47.450 --> 0:07:49.640
<v S2>is it going to have? Uh, how are they going

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:51.920
<v S2>to compare to alternatives like how are we even going

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.290
<v S2>to describe them? Like, you know, are they going to

0:07:54.290 --> 0:07:57.080
<v S2>be bundled this way or that way? These are critical

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.720
<v S2>decisions you're making at the beginning of a company, or

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:03.680
<v S2>even if inside a inside a large org that have

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.530
<v S2>such a big impact. And I think people often are

0:08:06.530 --> 0:08:08.990
<v S2>thinking about them as an afterthought. I know I certainly

0:08:08.990 --> 0:08:11.090
<v S2>was guilty of this, like when I was dropped at

0:08:11.090 --> 0:08:13.940
<v S2>a Dropbox. Like product marketing would often be like, you've

0:08:13.940 --> 0:08:15.710
<v S2>built the whole product, and now someone needs to write

0:08:15.710 --> 0:08:18.620
<v S2>the launch blog post, and that's where product marketing comes in.

0:08:18.620 --> 0:08:21.110
<v S2>But honestly, like, I think the right way to do

0:08:21.110 --> 0:08:24.800
<v S2>it is invest in product marketing way earlier. Like make

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:28.340
<v S2>your website landing page first and figure out force yourself

0:08:28.340 --> 0:08:30.410
<v S2>to understand how you're going to describe it, you know,

0:08:30.410 --> 0:08:32.059
<v S2>before writing a line of code.

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:36.130
<v S1>I think you're exactly right. I think this is the

0:08:36.130 --> 0:08:41.790
<v S1>whole thing is like. Have the story, the problem be

0:08:41.790 --> 0:08:44.670
<v S1>like in the very front. The problem is everything. Yeah.

0:08:44.670 --> 0:08:46.980
<v S1>Then you have the story and the wrapper around it.

0:08:46.980 --> 0:08:49.620
<v S1>Then you have your landing page, and then it's kind

0:08:49.620 --> 0:08:52.080
<v S1>of like the Amazon flow, which I used a lot

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:56.790
<v S1>at Apple as well. You you ship the PR, you

0:08:56.790 --> 0:08:59.309
<v S1>release the PR and it's like, here's what the website

0:08:59.309 --> 0:09:02.190
<v S1>looks like. Here's what the marketing looks like. How excited

0:09:02.190 --> 0:09:04.380
<v S1>are we about this? Yes. And if you pass this

0:09:04.380 --> 0:09:09.030
<v S1>around the table for this senior meeting and people aren't excited. Yeah.

0:09:09.030 --> 0:09:10.020
<v S1>What are you doing?

0:09:10.020 --> 0:09:11.550
<v S2>What is it all for? Yeah. What's the point?

0:09:11.550 --> 0:09:13.170
<v S1>Yeah, yeah, yeah. And if you are no.

0:09:13.170 --> 0:09:17.370
<v S2>Worse feeling than being in like, a company where you've

0:09:17.370 --> 0:09:20.729
<v S2>built the product, you've invested all this time engineering, and

0:09:20.730 --> 0:09:23.490
<v S2>then you're realizing that there's no worse feeling than that

0:09:23.490 --> 0:09:25.830
<v S2>because you're just like, oh God, what have we just do,

0:09:25.860 --> 0:09:27.930
<v S2>you know? So yeah, the more you can do it

0:09:27.929 --> 0:09:29.069
<v S2>up front, the better.

0:09:29.070 --> 0:09:34.220
<v S1>Yeah, definitely. So. So what do you, uh. There yourself

0:09:34.220 --> 0:09:37.850
<v S1>or the company in general believe about email security that

0:09:37.850 --> 0:09:38.960
<v S1>other people don't?

0:09:39.470 --> 0:09:42.920
<v S2>Yeah. Um, this is something that, you know, we have

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:46.250
<v S2>been kind of saying from the hilltops for a while, but.

0:09:46.950 --> 0:09:51.540
<v S2>The fundamental idea that led to this company was email

0:09:51.540 --> 0:09:54.690
<v S2>is seen in the security context as a really, really

0:09:54.690 --> 0:09:57.780
<v S2>good way to deliver an attack to you, right? Like,

0:09:57.780 --> 0:10:01.559
<v S2>you know, we are all familiar with sort of malware and, uh,

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:05.490
<v S2>phishing and like BCC and and that's true. Like it

0:10:05.490 --> 0:10:08.040
<v S2>is an open protocol. Anybody on the internet can send

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:10.290
<v S2>anybody else an email. That's part of what makes it great.

0:10:10.290 --> 0:10:13.470
<v S2>But in a security context, that's what makes it really terrible.

0:10:13.470 --> 0:10:16.530
<v S2>And there's been just years and years and years of

0:10:16.530 --> 0:10:19.770
<v S2>focus on email as a way to deliver an attack.

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.860
<v S2>What's happened, though, at the same time, especially over the

0:10:22.860 --> 0:10:27.030
<v S2>last decade, is we all got like cloud email. And

0:10:27.030 --> 0:10:29.910
<v S2>that meant that we basically got infinite storage and we

0:10:29.910 --> 0:10:33.390
<v S2>started hoarding all of our email. And that means that

0:10:33.390 --> 0:10:37.109
<v S2>it becomes this, like representation of your entire life. Uh,

0:10:37.110 --> 0:10:40.680
<v S2>on the personal front, it's like literally like everything in

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.200
<v S2>your life, like whether it's like your finances, taxes, your

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:46.230
<v S2>kids stuff, your house mortgage, it ends up in your email,

0:10:46.230 --> 0:10:48.750
<v S2>in the corporate setting, obviously, it's like all of the

0:10:48.750 --> 0:10:52.709
<v S2>company's IP, like the system of record. Right. And so

0:10:52.710 --> 0:10:54.690
<v S2>what that does is it makes it a really big

0:10:54.690 --> 0:10:57.420
<v S2>target as well. So it's not just the delivery method

0:10:57.420 --> 0:11:00.240
<v S2>of a bad attack. It's actually the thing that someone

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.730
<v S2>wants to steal now because it has all this content

0:11:02.730 --> 0:11:05.460
<v S2>inside it. Interesting. The thing that we believe about email

0:11:05.460 --> 0:11:08.190
<v S2>security that no one else does is that blocking phishing

0:11:08.190 --> 0:11:10.920
<v S2>and stuff is important. Uh, it really is, because it's

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:13.980
<v S2>still a really great entry point. But you also have

0:11:13.980 --> 0:11:16.770
<v S2>to think about email as a content repository that needs

0:11:16.770 --> 0:11:19.920
<v S2>to be secured, the same way that security has been

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:23.880
<v S2>securing other content repositories for a long time. Uh, so

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:26.340
<v S2>a lot of what we do at material tries to

0:11:26.340 --> 0:11:29.760
<v S2>block inbound emails that are bad, but it also tries

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:33.300
<v S2>to go, you know, have a plan. If someone does

0:11:33.300 --> 0:11:35.970
<v S2>get into a mail account and, you know, today, like

0:11:35.970 --> 0:11:37.830
<v S2>they would be able to steal all the content inside

0:11:37.830 --> 0:11:39.540
<v S2>it or they would be able to go like reset

0:11:39.540 --> 0:11:42.690
<v S2>my Dropbox password and take over Dropbox. We try to

0:11:42.690 --> 0:11:45.390
<v S2>mitigate those things and limit the blast radius of a

0:11:45.390 --> 0:11:47.700
<v S2>bad of a, of a of a breach. Basically, if

0:11:47.700 --> 0:11:50.070
<v S2>someone does get into an account, how can we stop

0:11:50.070 --> 0:11:52.020
<v S2>them from not doing as much harm as they would

0:11:52.020 --> 0:11:55.590
<v S2>normally have done? That's a thing where complementing traditional email

0:11:55.590 --> 0:11:56.520
<v S2>security with.

0:11:56.970 --> 0:12:00.480
<v S1>No, that's interesting. And what are the detection mechanisms for that?

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:05.760
<v S1>So let's say someone has a credential. Yeah. Um like what?

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.579
<v S1>How are you detecting if you move around, you do

0:12:08.580 --> 0:12:10.320
<v S1>something dangerous inside the account.

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:12.930
<v S2>Yeah. So the first thing I'd say is, like, it

0:12:12.929 --> 0:12:15.600
<v S2>actually doesn't have to be about detection at all. So

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:17.850
<v S2>let me give you an example. So let's say like

0:12:17.850 --> 0:12:20.250
<v S2>we take a, the uh, the analogy of a car.

0:12:20.250 --> 0:12:23.699
<v S2>So a seatbelt is something you just put on when

0:12:23.700 --> 0:12:26.520
<v S2>you drive a car. It doesn't like detect the accident

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:29.190
<v S2>and like go into like motion right before the accident

0:12:29.190 --> 0:12:30.990
<v S2>is going to happen. Like it's just there. It does

0:12:30.990 --> 0:12:35.370
<v S2>its job. Yeah. Um, so similarly, you know, we're not

0:12:35.370 --> 0:12:38.070
<v S2>necessarily detecting the presence of an attacker and then trying

0:12:38.070 --> 0:12:40.620
<v S2>to respond. We're just saying there are certain controls you

0:12:40.620 --> 0:12:43.859
<v S2>should just have all the time. So for example, um,

0:12:43.860 --> 0:12:47.280
<v S2>if you, uh, one of our products is called, uh,

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:49.410
<v S2>data protection for email. And what it does is it

0:12:49.410 --> 0:12:53.579
<v S2>goes through your archive and via APIs, it looks for

0:12:53.580 --> 0:12:56.040
<v S2>anything that it thinks is really sensitive, like really juicy

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:59.550
<v S2>stuff that's in your archives. And if it's like older

0:12:59.550 --> 0:13:01.800
<v S2>than some specified period of time, let's say a year

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:05.130
<v S2>or six months, it it can actually redact it inside

0:13:05.130 --> 0:13:09.060
<v S2>your mailbox and make you do a side channel challenge,

0:13:09.059 --> 0:13:11.400
<v S2>like an MFA or a, you know, touch ID or

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.130
<v S2>an octopus or whatever before you can get it back

0:13:14.130 --> 0:13:17.700
<v S2>in your mailbox. And, um, that's like a simple control

0:13:17.700 --> 0:13:20.640
<v S2>that is not it's not going into place when we

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:24.600
<v S2>detect an attacker. It's just there all the time. Because,

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:27.390
<v S2>you know, in the same way that, uh, for other

0:13:27.390 --> 0:13:29.250
<v S2>content repos, you wouldn't want it to be the case

0:13:29.250 --> 0:13:31.740
<v S2>that if I get in once, I just get everything.

0:13:31.740 --> 0:13:33.780
<v S2>You would want to have additional checks. We're just trying

0:13:33.780 --> 0:13:36.209
<v S2>to do that for email as well. Now, what's cool

0:13:36.210 --> 0:13:40.110
<v S2>about that, though, is that it opens up detection capabilities,

0:13:40.110 --> 0:13:42.750
<v S2>because now let's say someone was in my account and

0:13:42.750 --> 0:13:45.120
<v S2>they're going to try to like retrieve these messages that

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:48.179
<v S2>have been redacted. Well, yeah. If they like try and

0:13:48.179 --> 0:13:51.120
<v S2>they keep failing requests. Now it acts as a canary

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:53.250
<v S2>and it tells us, okay, there might be someone in

0:13:53.250 --> 0:13:57.030
<v S2>this mailbox, um, which is actually, you know, funny story. Like,

0:13:57.030 --> 0:14:00.240
<v S2>recently there was this big attack, uh, by the Chinese

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:03.329
<v S2>called storm. Uh, uh, it was a storm eight breach.

0:14:03.330 --> 0:14:06.870
<v S2>It's a group that attacked the Department of Justice and

0:14:06.870 --> 0:14:10.349
<v S2>a State Department and a couple other, uh, federal agencies,

0:14:10.350 --> 0:14:13.950
<v S2>and they basically were after email correspondence. That's why they

0:14:13.950 --> 0:14:17.219
<v S2>did it. They went after the content of these mailboxes.

0:14:17.309 --> 0:14:20.790
<v S2>And one of the agencies that actually discovered this attack

0:14:20.820 --> 0:14:23.130
<v S2>the way they did that is because they were looking

0:14:23.130 --> 0:14:26.490
<v S2>at a log of every time an email message inside

0:14:26.490 --> 0:14:30.120
<v S2>a mailbox is accessed. It's a very verbose log. Um,

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:33.120
<v S2>most people don't use it or don't, uh, operationalize it,

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:36.060
<v S2>but they were. And it's how they figured out, oh, man.

0:14:36.060 --> 0:14:38.460
<v S2>Like someone is reading all these emails from like, three

0:14:38.460 --> 0:14:40.800
<v S2>years ago, and they're doing it at a very high

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:43.470
<v S2>volume versus what the normal usage of the mailbox is.

0:14:43.470 --> 0:14:46.170
<v S2>So you do want canaries that can tell you about.

0:14:46.370 --> 0:14:49.490
<v S2>The attacker. But more importantly, you want to just like

0:14:49.490 --> 0:14:51.200
<v S2>limit what the attacker can do in the first place

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:53.090
<v S2>because it's not just all about detection.

0:14:53.300 --> 0:14:56.000
<v S1>Yeah, I love that because that that kind of takes

0:14:56.000 --> 0:15:00.020
<v S1>the realm away from like an email security. Yeah. Vibe,

0:15:00.020 --> 0:15:02.600
<v S1>which is very, I don't know, 20 years ago or

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:05.510
<v S1>whatever and moves it into more of like a data

0:15:05.510 --> 0:15:07.550
<v S1>security or like an app security.

0:15:07.550 --> 0:15:10.640
<v S2>That's right. That's exactly right. And, and, um, this is

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:14.030
<v S2>one of those situations where like, like the terminology is

0:15:14.030 --> 0:15:17.720
<v S2>actually hurting us as an industry because it's like, okay,

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.510
<v S2>so email security means what you just said, right? For

0:15:20.510 --> 0:15:22.700
<v S2>20 years it's blocked bad emails.

0:15:22.700 --> 0:15:25.670
<v S1>Yeah. SMTP related settings, whatever. Yeah.

0:15:25.670 --> 0:15:28.310
<v S2>Or like I'm going to send you like the, you know, like, uh,

0:15:28.310 --> 0:15:32.300
<v S2>sasser werm over email like 20 years ago, but like, uh,

0:15:32.300 --> 0:15:37.760
<v S2>or more than 20 years ago. Man, it's been a while. Um, yeah. But, uh,

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:40.370
<v S2>but I think then what do you call the thing

0:15:40.370 --> 0:15:43.310
<v S2>that tries to go protect the sensitive content in your email?

0:15:43.310 --> 0:15:46.580
<v S2>I mean, technically, it's security for your email messages. So

0:15:46.580 --> 0:15:49.100
<v S2>is it email security? I mean, maybe, but like, yeah,

0:15:49.100 --> 0:15:52.280
<v S2>to your point, it's more like data security or app security. Um,

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:55.700
<v S2>you know, it gets even more like, uh, tricky, like. So,

0:15:55.700 --> 0:15:57.680
<v S2>for example, I mentioned that I was at Dropbox before

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:00.020
<v S2>this company. One of the biggest ways we would see

0:16:00.050 --> 0:16:03.500
<v S2>Dropbox accounts get hacked is an email account would get hacked,

0:16:03.500 --> 0:16:06.590
<v S2>and then the adversary would just reset a password to

0:16:06.590 --> 0:16:09.859
<v S2>Dropbox because, um, back then and I think this is

0:16:09.860 --> 0:16:12.140
<v S2>still the case, like, even if you had MFA on

0:16:12.140 --> 0:16:15.890
<v S2>your Dropbox account, if you requested a password reset email,

0:16:15.890 --> 0:16:18.830
<v S2>Dropbox would let you reset the password without triggering MFA

0:16:18.830 --> 0:16:21.440
<v S2>because it assumed that if you had lost your first factor,

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:24.050
<v S2>you would have also lost your second factor. Um, but

0:16:24.050 --> 0:16:25.820
<v S2>that means, like if I get access to an email

0:16:25.820 --> 0:16:28.040
<v S2>account now, all of a sudden every service that is

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:31.070
<v S2>connected to that email account, I can just move it to, um,

0:16:31.070 --> 0:16:34.190
<v S2>this happened, you know, with like, uh, McDonald's. They had

0:16:34.190 --> 0:16:37.100
<v S2>their Twitter account taken over because someone broke into, like

0:16:37.100 --> 0:16:40.250
<v S2>a marketing person's email account and then reset the Twitter

0:16:40.250 --> 0:16:43.070
<v S2>password and they could just post anything they wanted as McDonald's.

0:16:43.070 --> 0:16:46.160
<v S2>So you kind of see this thing where, like, email

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:50.120
<v S2>is really more than just a bad way to deliver something, uh, or, sorry,

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:52.820
<v S2>a way to deliver something bad. It is like all

0:16:52.820 --> 0:16:55.520
<v S2>of these other things open up from an email account

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:58.190
<v S2>if you, if you, um, if you get it access once.

0:16:59.060 --> 0:17:02.090
<v S1>Yeah. I love this idea. It's it's almost like you

0:17:02.090 --> 0:17:04.760
<v S1>can make a total list of all the bad things

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:07.820
<v S1>that can happen around email. Yeah. And then not even

0:17:07.820 --> 0:17:10.250
<v S1>think about email security. Not even think about any type

0:17:10.250 --> 0:17:13.609
<v S1>of security. Just make a list of, like, abuse cases. Yeah, yeah.

0:17:13.609 --> 0:17:16.790
<v S1>And then be like, okay, so where are the different

0:17:16.790 --> 0:17:19.040
<v S1>layers of control that we could put on this. Is

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:21.889
<v S1>this a. And then you could assign the labels afterwards

0:17:21.890 --> 0:17:24.050
<v S1>and be like this is kind of a data security thing.

0:17:24.050 --> 0:17:27.500
<v S1>We kind of think of this as appsec or whatever. Yeah.

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:30.530
<v S1>And then just be like, look there's like 13 of

0:17:30.530 --> 0:17:33.380
<v S1>these and they're really important. I mean, what are some

0:17:33.380 --> 0:17:35.000
<v S1>of the other ones that are kind of like a

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:38.600
<v S1>more traditional appsec type control that, that you.

0:17:39.170 --> 0:17:42.949
<v S2>Um, I think there's so, you know, there's going after data, uh,

0:17:42.950 --> 0:17:46.100
<v S2>then there's using lateral movement, uh, like I said, with

0:17:46.100 --> 0:17:47.960
<v S2>the password reset type of stuff. So trying to figure

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:50.000
<v S2>out where else I can get from this. So is

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:53.660
<v S2>a vector for further attack. Um, the other kind of

0:17:53.660 --> 0:17:56.270
<v S2>thing that is very common is if I'm in control

0:17:56.270 --> 0:17:59.659
<v S2>of a mailbox now, I can send email from it, obviously,

0:17:59.660 --> 0:18:02.570
<v S2>and like impersonate the person who I've just taken over.

0:18:02.570 --> 0:18:05.659
<v S2>So this is one of the most common ways that like, uh,

0:18:05.660 --> 0:18:09.169
<v S2>business email compromise happens where, uh, let's say you're a

0:18:09.170 --> 0:18:11.810
<v S2>big company, you have a vendor that sends you invoices

0:18:11.810 --> 0:18:15.530
<v S2>every month. Someone takes over the vendor's account, uh, sends

0:18:15.530 --> 0:18:17.780
<v S2>an email from the vendor that's like, hey, we need

0:18:17.780 --> 0:18:20.660
<v S2>to change the payment terms of our invoice. And you're like, okay, cool.

0:18:20.660 --> 0:18:22.879
<v S2>It's coming from the valid email. And now all of

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:25.639
<v S2>a sudden, you've wired money to the wrong place, right? So, uh,

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:29.510
<v S2>that's another abuse case of taking over a mailbox. Um,

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:33.470
<v S2>and but but honestly, there aren't that many. And this

0:18:33.470 --> 0:18:36.379
<v S2>is kind of like, I, I like your point of, like,

0:18:36.380 --> 0:18:38.750
<v S2>making that list. Uh, when we started this company, me

0:18:38.750 --> 0:18:42.110
<v S2>and my, one of my co-founders. Big. We're big into analogies.

0:18:42.109 --> 0:18:44.360
<v S2>So I'll give you another analogy, right? Like, okay, if

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:47.210
<v S2>you're thinking about, like, protecting your house and you have

0:18:47.210 --> 0:18:49.550
<v S2>to make a list of every single way I could

0:18:49.550 --> 0:18:52.040
<v S2>break into your house, like, how do I get in? Yep.

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:54.560
<v S2>And so that's one list. And now you make another

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:56.930
<v S2>list of, like, every single thing. I would actually want

0:18:56.930 --> 0:18:59.660
<v S2>a value in your house that you really care about. Yes.

0:18:59.660 --> 0:19:02.359
<v S2>Like which list is shorter? I would argue that second

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:04.580
<v S2>list is way shorter, right? It's like okay, like there's

0:19:04.580 --> 0:19:08.359
<v S2>a few things that like are your crown jewels, uh,

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:11.360
<v S2>and you want to protect. So if you take that

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.780
<v S2>same idea to email security, if you think about every

0:19:14.780 --> 0:19:18.050
<v S2>single way an email account can be compromised, it is

0:19:18.050 --> 0:19:19.969
<v S2>like a long list, like I can I can do

0:19:19.970 --> 0:19:23.270
<v S2>a malicious OAuth application, I can bypass MFA. Maybe I

0:19:23.270 --> 0:19:25.790
<v S2>get a malicious browser extension, I might steal a personal

0:19:25.790 --> 0:19:29.240
<v S2>device like client side malware list goes on. And I mean,

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:32.570
<v S2>in the case of like some of these state actor attacks,

0:19:32.570 --> 0:19:36.020
<v S2>it's like literally zero days or, you know, a forged

0:19:36.020 --> 0:19:38.960
<v S2>token at the Microsoft level. There's like just a long,

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:41.570
<v S2>long list. But then what do I actually want? Once

0:19:41.570 --> 0:19:43.310
<v S2>I get into an email account, it's like 2 or

0:19:43.310 --> 0:19:45.290
<v S2>3 things like, you know, I want the data that's

0:19:45.290 --> 0:19:48.050
<v S2>inside the. Mailbox already. I want to move laterally to

0:19:48.050 --> 0:19:51.560
<v S2>some other services. I want to send outbound email to

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:54.800
<v S2>a specific people. So it's just a much, much shorter list.

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:57.229
<v S2>And to your point, you can kind of iterate through

0:19:57.230 --> 0:19:59.450
<v S2>each of those abuse cases and say, what controls can

0:19:59.450 --> 0:20:03.109
<v S2>I put into place and actually really take a solid

0:20:03.109 --> 0:20:05.570
<v S2>dent on, like the harm that you can do from

0:20:05.570 --> 0:20:09.260
<v S2>a compromised mailbox? Um, so I like that way of

0:20:09.260 --> 0:20:10.070
<v S2>thinking a lot.

0:20:10.950 --> 0:20:15.810
<v S1>Yeah. Yeah, I think it's really interesting. I love that

0:20:15.810 --> 0:20:19.350
<v S1>you're thinking in less the same way. I, I very

0:20:19.350 --> 0:20:21.600
<v S1>much think that way. I think of a risk register

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:25.650
<v S1>that way. I think of threat scenarios, uh, attack scenarios

0:20:25.650 --> 0:20:30.420
<v S1>like defenses. And you kind of just match them up. Yeah. Um,

0:20:30.420 --> 0:20:33.869
<v S1>I hate to say the a word, but, um, one

0:20:33.869 --> 0:20:37.110
<v S1>one thing, uh, that I think about a lot is,

0:20:37.109 --> 0:20:40.709
<v S1>is like, okay, if one of those things is convincing

0:20:40.710 --> 0:20:44.699
<v S1>somebody to do something. Yes. Like, hey, it's time to go, uh,

0:20:44.700 --> 0:20:47.910
<v S1>go send this money. I need it urgently. Yeah. You

0:20:47.910 --> 0:20:51.419
<v S1>can ask, uh, an LLM or AI or whatever. Like

0:20:51.570 --> 0:20:55.980
<v S1>is is someone applying pressure of urgency here? Yes. Yes. Um,

0:20:55.980 --> 0:20:58.500
<v S1>and is that sense of urgency tied to a thing

0:20:58.500 --> 0:21:00.840
<v S1>that matters a lot, like sending money? Yes.

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:02.040
<v S3>Right. Yeah.

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:04.919
<v S1>So you could just build this, you know, very large

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.140
<v S1>list of like, all the different bad things. And like

0:21:07.140 --> 0:21:10.290
<v S1>you said, it's, um, there could be API keys, there

0:21:10.290 --> 0:21:13.500
<v S1>could be, um, uh, one of the big things a

0:21:13.500 --> 0:21:16.800
<v S1>lot of foreign actors do, as you know, more than me,

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:19.889
<v S1>is like, go after sources and look for, like, with

0:21:19.890 --> 0:21:22.530
<v S1>reporters and stuff like that. Yes. So if you just

0:21:22.530 --> 0:21:25.740
<v S1>had this giant grid of like all these different situations

0:21:25.740 --> 0:21:28.800
<v S1>and be like, oh, this one, we could do LLM

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:31.350
<v S1>to detect that this one is just a setting inside

0:21:31.350 --> 0:21:34.350
<v S1>the platform to do that one. Yes. I love that

0:21:34.350 --> 0:21:35.760
<v S1>comprehensive approach.

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.760
<v S2>100% agree with you. Um, and in fact, the thing

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:41.790
<v S2>that you just pointed out, we literally use LMS for

0:21:41.790 --> 0:21:43.109
<v S2>on the detection side because.

0:21:43.109 --> 0:21:43.709
<v S3>Sometimes.

0:21:43.710 --> 0:21:47.550
<v S2>Because sometimes, um, you know, to be honest, like a

0:21:47.550 --> 0:21:50.790
<v S2>lot of the kind of NLU stuff of like detecting

0:21:50.790 --> 0:21:53.760
<v S2>things like urgency and stuff like that that's been around

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:57.000
<v S2>for a while, but then like there's and it didn't

0:21:57.000 --> 0:21:59.580
<v S2>require LMS, you know, you can train like a traditional

0:21:59.580 --> 0:22:03.149
<v S2>machine learning model. But what is cool about LMS is

0:22:03.150 --> 0:22:06.420
<v S2>that the speed of iteration is very fast. So like

0:22:06.420 --> 0:22:09.359
<v S2>you can very quickly put things in. You don't have

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:12.960
<v S2>to worry about things like, you know, multi-language support because

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:15.899
<v S2>that's handled by the LM. And then also where it

0:22:15.900 --> 0:22:19.890
<v S2>really becomes handy is for things that are even more complicated. So,

0:22:19.890 --> 0:22:22.140
<v S2>you know, I'll give you an example, like if I'm

0:22:22.140 --> 0:22:24.629
<v S2>a company and I'm trying to protect sensitive email, some

0:22:24.630 --> 0:22:25.800
<v S2>of it is going to be kind of like the

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:29.969
<v S2>classic like Social Security numbers, credit card numbers, whatever. But

0:22:29.970 --> 0:22:31.560
<v S2>some of it is going to be like, is there

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:34.020
<v S2>a negotiation happening in this email thread?

0:22:34.020 --> 0:22:34.950
<v S3>Yes.

0:22:34.950 --> 0:22:36.780
<v S2>It's like, how the hell do you how do you

0:22:36.780 --> 0:22:39.689
<v S2>like write a detection for that? You know, like you write,

0:22:39.690 --> 0:22:43.109
<v S2>it's really hard. Uh, or like, oh, it's like is

0:22:43.109 --> 0:22:47.220
<v S2>a executive abusing power in this email thread, uh, where

0:22:47.250 --> 0:22:49.859
<v S2>like if it got if it leaked like it would like,

0:22:49.859 --> 0:22:52.920
<v S2>have a reputational damage. Um, that's the kind of stuff

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:55.800
<v S2>that is very difficult or like, you know, you see,

0:22:55.830 --> 0:23:00.570
<v S2>kind of like examples of, like extortion or like blackmail. Um,

0:23:00.570 --> 0:23:04.470
<v S2>so for those types of things, LMS are fantastic detection

0:23:04.470 --> 0:23:07.650
<v S2>tools because, I mean, their job is to understand language literally. Right?

0:23:07.650 --> 0:23:11.250
<v S2>So like, they're very, very good at that. Um, I

0:23:11.250 --> 0:23:15.000
<v S2>think a lot of the email security discussion with LMS

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:19.350
<v S2>has actually been pretty like pessimistic because people's heads immediately

0:23:19.350 --> 0:23:22.320
<v S2>go to, oh my God, like, this thing can generate text,

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:24.510
<v S2>which means it can generate phishing emails. And so like

0:23:24.510 --> 0:23:26.609
<v S2>now all of a sudden any bad guy can write

0:23:26.609 --> 0:23:31.109
<v S2>emails and like send them. And, you know, there there

0:23:31.109 --> 0:23:33.390
<v S2>is an element of truth to that for sure. Because like,

0:23:33.390 --> 0:23:37.710
<v S2>you can kind of scale up any kind of like phishing, um, uh,

0:23:37.710 --> 0:23:41.340
<v S2>campaign just by like, you know, doing research via the

0:23:41.340 --> 0:23:45.450
<v S2>LMS and having it customized. So 100% is a valid

0:23:45.450 --> 0:23:48.840
<v S2>it's a valid fear. But my kind of answer to

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:51.720
<v S2>that has always been like, well, shouldn't your good security

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:56.310
<v S2>controls be sort of, um, agnostic to how an attack

0:23:56.310 --> 0:23:58.740
<v S2>is generated? Like, who cares if it's like a person

0:23:58.740 --> 0:24:01.949
<v S2>writing the email themselves after hours of research, or they

0:24:01.950 --> 0:24:04.470
<v S2>just automated it with like an LLM? At the end

0:24:04.470 --> 0:24:06.240
<v S2>of the day, if you have a good control in place,

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:10.260
<v S2>like it shouldn't matter. And so and by the way,

0:24:10.260 --> 0:24:13.080
<v S2>like a lot of these AI tools like LMS are

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:16.380
<v S2>a fantastic on the defensive side too. So I would

0:24:16.380 --> 0:24:18.570
<v S2>personally like to see a little bit more optimism there. Uh,

0:24:18.570 --> 0:24:21.300
<v S2>because like so far, a lot of the fear mongering

0:24:21.300 --> 0:24:23.490
<v S2>around LMS has been, oh God, they're going to write

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:26.250
<v S2>ten more phishing emails. And it's like, yes, but like

0:24:26.250 --> 0:24:29.939
<v S2>your control should work anyway. Good ones at least. And secondly,

0:24:29.940 --> 0:24:32.190
<v S2>you can also use them on the defensive side. So

0:24:32.190 --> 0:24:34.230
<v S2>there's there's a lot to be optimistic about.

0:24:34.230 --> 0:24:37.170
<v S1>Yeah I love that. The way I've been framing that

0:24:37.170 --> 0:24:41.020
<v S1>is um. Uh, Red is going to have like this

0:24:41.020 --> 0:24:43.960
<v S1>massive advantage in the beginning because they could just like

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.719
<v S1>they don't have to experiment and be careful. Yeah. They

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:49.359
<v S1>could just like so the spearfishing like, starts the day

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:51.070
<v S1>after an LM comes out. Yes.

0:24:51.070 --> 0:24:51.790
<v S2>Yeah. Exactly.

0:24:51.790 --> 0:24:52.090
<v S3>Yeah.

0:24:52.090 --> 0:24:56.740
<v S1>But um, blue should actually get better with those same

0:24:56.740 --> 0:24:57.580
<v S1>AI tools.

0:24:57.580 --> 0:24:57.970
<v S3>Yeah.

0:24:57.970 --> 0:25:01.119
<v S1>So ideally it would be something like oh we have a,

0:25:01.300 --> 0:25:04.390
<v S1>we have a Sea team member who is like just

0:25:04.390 --> 0:25:07.420
<v S1>so ego driven. And if you compliment them in any

0:25:07.420 --> 0:25:10.720
<v S1>way and like say, hey, I want you to lead

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.270
<v S1>this new foundation or something like they're going to click

0:25:13.270 --> 0:25:14.020
<v S1>that email.

0:25:14.500 --> 0:25:14.710
<v S3>Yeah.

0:25:14.710 --> 0:25:16.270
<v S1>So you flagged that or something.

0:25:16.270 --> 0:25:16.600
<v S3>Yeah.

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.210
<v S1>This goes back to what I think so cool about.

0:25:19.210 --> 0:25:19.810
<v S3>That would be funny.

0:25:19.810 --> 0:25:22.690
<v S2>It's like this email is complimenting you. You don't ever

0:25:22.690 --> 0:25:24.369
<v S2>get compliments. This especially.

0:25:24.790 --> 0:25:25.149
<v S3>Right.

0:25:25.150 --> 0:25:29.020
<v S1>That's right. And you click on 94 of them 94%

0:25:29.020 --> 0:25:30.940
<v S1>of them when you do get to compliment. So this

0:25:30.940 --> 0:25:35.850
<v S1>is dangerous. Um, yeah. Yeah. So it's like. The other

0:25:35.850 --> 0:25:38.730
<v S1>thing that's really powerful about this is, um, you can

0:25:38.730 --> 0:25:43.500
<v S1>have additional context customized for your particular company. Yeah. So

0:25:43.500 --> 0:25:46.770
<v S1>it's like, um, we're doing this thing with France or something.

0:25:46.770 --> 0:25:50.280
<v S1>It's really sensitive. Yes. And, uh, so anything around that is,

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:52.110
<v S1>you know, notch that up two levels.

0:25:52.109 --> 0:25:52.530
<v S3>Totally.

0:25:52.530 --> 0:25:55.350
<v S2>Totally. Yeah, yeah. And so, yeah, we've been talking about

0:25:55.350 --> 0:25:59.100
<v S2>kind of like suspicious or malicious emails, but LMS like

0:25:59.100 --> 0:26:01.770
<v S2>I think you just alluded to also very helpful for

0:26:01.770 --> 0:26:05.340
<v S2>the sensitive emails because like yes. Yeah. To your point,

0:26:05.340 --> 0:26:08.550
<v S2>like maybe today you want to say something like anything

0:26:08.550 --> 0:26:11.040
<v S2>about this project or we're about to we're prepping to

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:13.830
<v S2>go to IPO. Uh, not material, but as a hypothetical.

0:26:13.830 --> 0:26:14.400
<v S3>Right. Exactly.

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:19.719
<v S2>Like it's like, uh. How any conversation around like IPO

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:22.390
<v S2>prep is pretty sensitive. Like, but how do you how

0:26:22.390 --> 0:26:25.660
<v S2>do you declare that as a general sensitive content category,

0:26:25.660 --> 0:26:29.320
<v S2>it's pretty hard without something like an LLM. So leveraging

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:33.340
<v S2>them for those custom detection categories or context specific detection

0:26:33.340 --> 0:26:36.190
<v S2>categories is very exciting. Um, and I and I think

0:26:36.190 --> 0:26:39.250
<v S2>that that is the way the, the sort of like, uh,

0:26:39.250 --> 0:26:40.780
<v S2>security controls are headed.

0:26:41.500 --> 0:26:45.340
<v S1>Yeah, absolutely. The other use case I thought about for

0:26:45.340 --> 0:26:49.120
<v S1>a long time about that is like, um, legal companies

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:50.290
<v S1>were being attacked.

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:50.920
<v S3>Um, law.

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:54.340
<v S1>Firms. Yeah. And they have very little IT staff, very

0:26:54.340 --> 0:26:58.090
<v S1>little security knowledge. Yes. And what they have is this

0:26:58.090 --> 0:27:02.710
<v S1>list of connections, people interacting with different people. Yeah. Uh,

0:27:02.710 --> 0:27:05.890
<v S1>suing different people. And it's like, that's the mapping that

0:27:05.890 --> 0:27:07.629
<v S1>that attacker might want, want to use.

0:27:07.630 --> 0:27:08.560
<v S3>Yes. Yeah.

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:11.139
<v S2>Totally. Well, and that's another I mean, that brings up

0:27:11.140 --> 0:27:14.050
<v S2>one other point about email that is hard, is that

0:27:14.050 --> 0:27:17.500
<v S2>the way email works is when when a message is

0:27:17.500 --> 0:27:21.970
<v S2>sent to multiple people, uh, everyone gets a copy, obviously. Right.

0:27:21.970 --> 0:27:24.850
<v S2>So there's no like pointer relationship with email. Like you

0:27:24.850 --> 0:27:29.080
<v S2>each get a copy, which means that one of the

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:30.790
<v S2>downsides is that is like you could be doing a

0:27:30.790 --> 0:27:33.609
<v S2>great job with your own email security and like, you

0:27:33.609 --> 0:27:37.060
<v S2>could have minimized the impact of a compromised account or whatever.

0:27:37.060 --> 0:27:40.510
<v S2>But then like the person who was CC'd, like, you know,

0:27:40.510 --> 0:27:42.820
<v S2>they might have terrible, you know, when when we started

0:27:42.820 --> 0:27:45.340
<v S2>the company, like I mentioned, it was after the 2016

0:27:45.340 --> 0:27:48.429
<v S2>election cycle, and one of the attacks that happened then

0:27:48.430 --> 0:27:50.950
<v S2>was John Podesta, who was Hillary's campaign chairman. He had

0:27:50.950 --> 0:27:54.400
<v S2>his personal Gmail account compromised, and all of his emails

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:56.980
<v S2>were put on Wikileaks, like literally like years and years

0:27:56.980 --> 0:28:00.399
<v S2>of his personal Gmail. And and there were things in

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.040
<v S2>there that he was just seized on. He had literally

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:05.200
<v S2>no reason to even be on the message. He was

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:09.400
<v S2>just CC. And because of that, all this communication that

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:13.389
<v S2>was about like the election or about like prepping for

0:28:13.390 --> 0:28:17.560
<v S2>something that like, frankly, he just was being an FYI on. Yeah.

0:28:17.890 --> 0:28:20.530
<v S2>You know, um, so I think the, the fact that

0:28:20.530 --> 0:28:23.380
<v S2>everybody gets a copy is hard. And what that means

0:28:23.380 --> 0:28:25.090
<v S2>is you kind of have to think about who you're

0:28:25.090 --> 0:28:28.240
<v S2>like trusted parties are that are outside of your control

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:31.690
<v S2>and make sure they have good practices, you know, which

0:28:31.690 --> 0:28:34.119
<v S2>which becomes a it's kind of like, uh, similar to

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:37.060
<v S2>a supply chain security problem, right? Where you're like on

0:28:37.060 --> 0:28:39.670
<v S2>the software side, you're thinking about all the dependencies your

0:28:39.670 --> 0:28:42.550
<v S2>software has on the kind of email side, you might

0:28:42.550 --> 0:28:45.970
<v S2>have to think about all the different, um, associates of

0:28:45.970 --> 0:28:48.820
<v S2>your company that have, you know, your email as well.

0:28:48.970 --> 0:28:53.290
<v S1>Yeah. Or like, uh, PCI where the scope is contagious. Yeah.

0:28:53.290 --> 0:28:55.990
<v S1>It like slightly brushes up against it. Now that's in scope.

0:28:55.990 --> 0:28:59.620
<v S1>It's like yeah, yeah, yeah. Interesting. Um, so so what

0:28:59.620 --> 0:29:03.550
<v S1>does it look like to basically onboard the tech. Like

0:29:03.550 --> 0:29:06.520
<v S1>what does the integration look like. What's the experience like

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:08.530
<v S1>how fast can somebody get up and running.

0:29:08.740 --> 0:29:11.080
<v S2>Yeah. So it's incredibly fast. And the reason for that

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:14.380
<v S2>is everything we do uh works with cloud mailboxes which

0:29:14.380 --> 0:29:18.310
<v S2>have APIs. So our whole integration point, um, is API based.

0:29:18.310 --> 0:29:21.459
<v S2>It's just an OAuth grant where we are getting access

0:29:21.460 --> 0:29:25.090
<v S2>to email via API. Uh, which is a big difference

0:29:25.090 --> 0:29:27.790
<v S2>from like, uh, you know, legacy email security products that

0:29:27.790 --> 0:29:28.600
<v S2>some folks might.

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:30.190
<v S3>Be away or something. Yeah.

0:29:30.190 --> 0:29:32.860
<v S2>Where you're like changing your DNS and like routing email

0:29:32.860 --> 0:29:35.710
<v S2>through the appliance, like you're not doing any of that. Um,

0:29:35.710 --> 0:29:38.650
<v S2>as a result, the integration is very quick. But also

0:29:38.650 --> 0:29:41.980
<v S2>it means that you don't take some dependency on this

0:29:41.980 --> 0:29:45.100
<v S2>API based thing going down and like, you know, shutting

0:29:45.100 --> 0:29:47.709
<v S2>off your email, like, for example, like if material were

0:29:47.710 --> 0:29:49.720
<v S2>to go down, it's not like email stops flowing. You're

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:52.930
<v S2>still you're still doing email as usual. Of course, some

0:29:52.930 --> 0:29:55.270
<v S2>of the detections material does or some of the mitigations

0:29:55.270 --> 0:29:57.820
<v S2>it does would be would not be active. But we're

0:29:57.820 --> 0:30:00.940
<v S2>not in your email flow. Um, so it's pretty quick.

0:30:00.940 --> 0:30:03.430
<v S2>The other benefit of APIs is you can be very

0:30:03.430 --> 0:30:06.790
<v S2>selective in how you deploy that, deploy the protection inside

0:30:06.790 --> 0:30:10.030
<v S2>your company. So for example, with gateways, it's a kind

0:30:10.030 --> 0:30:12.489
<v S2>of an all or nothing you like do a cutover. Um,

0:30:12.490 --> 0:30:16.060
<v S2>but with API based email security products, you can say, hey,

0:30:16.060 --> 0:30:19.780
<v S2>for my executives do X, but for my other team Y,

0:30:19.780 --> 0:30:21.970
<v S2>you know, you can kind of have different settings, different

0:30:21.970 --> 0:30:25.000
<v S2>kind of configurations or policies. So that is something that

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:27.130
<v S2>a lot of our customers also take advantage of.

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:30.760
<v S1>Yeah, that's really cool. And what does it look like

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:33.550
<v S1>to know that it's working. Like what is the interface

0:30:33.550 --> 0:30:37.600
<v S1>look like. Um, if there's nothing wrong, do you just

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:39.730
<v S1>not see it? And then does it sort of move

0:30:39.730 --> 0:30:42.340
<v S1>up the level in priority if it sees something?

0:30:42.340 --> 0:30:43.000
<v S3>Yeah.

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:45.340
<v S2>Well, we have a few different products. So depending on

0:30:45.340 --> 0:30:47.080
<v S2>the product we're talking about, you know, what you would

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:49.630
<v S2>see is slightly different. So one of our products that

0:30:49.630 --> 0:30:52.270
<v S2>we've been talking about a little bit so far is uh,

0:30:52.270 --> 0:30:55.690
<v S2>we go and redact sensitive messages that are older than

0:30:55.690 --> 0:31:00.250
<v S2>some specified time frame. And uh, and then an end

0:31:00.250 --> 0:31:03.250
<v S2>user has to pass like an Okta challenge or some

0:31:03.250 --> 0:31:06.490
<v S2>sort of secondary challenge. Uh, it can be really any

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:09.940
<v S2>IDP or so. If they pass that, then we restore

0:31:09.940 --> 0:31:12.670
<v S2>the message right back into the mailbox. It's really seamless.

0:31:12.670 --> 0:31:14.590
<v S2>And then after some amount of time, once the user

0:31:14.590 --> 0:31:16.770
<v S2>is kind of done with it, we will redact. Did again.

0:31:16.770 --> 0:31:19.950
<v S2>So for that product, what you see as an IT

0:31:19.950 --> 0:31:23.760
<v S2>or security admin is really not much on a day

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:25.469
<v S2>to day basis, because it's kind of like just in

0:31:25.470 --> 0:31:28.380
<v S2>the background doing its thing. Uh, you do get an

0:31:28.380 --> 0:31:32.070
<v S2>access request log. So every time someone is accessing one

0:31:32.070 --> 0:31:34.410
<v S2>of these sensitive messages and having to do the retrieval,

0:31:34.410 --> 0:31:37.500
<v S2>now there's a paper trail of that, obviously you could

0:31:37.500 --> 0:31:40.620
<v S2>you could pipe that into like a SIM or something

0:31:40.620 --> 0:31:42.360
<v S2>and say, okay, like if I'm seeing a lot of

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:46.230
<v S2>these from someone at the same time, that's that's indicative

0:31:46.230 --> 0:31:47.970
<v S2>of something bad. Or if I'm getting a lot of

0:31:47.970 --> 0:31:50.550
<v S2>denials in a row, obviously, that that ends up being

0:31:50.550 --> 0:31:53.790
<v S2>something bad, but really there's nothing to like, detect or

0:31:53.790 --> 0:31:56.130
<v S2>show on a daily basis because people are just doing

0:31:56.130 --> 0:32:01.140
<v S2>a self-serve, secure workflow for accessing sensitive content. Um, on

0:32:01.140 --> 0:32:03.300
<v S2>the other hand, we do have a product that is

0:32:03.300 --> 0:32:05.910
<v S2>a much more in the kind of traditional look for

0:32:05.910 --> 0:32:09.450
<v S2>sophisticated attacks that bypass like Google or Microsoft or Proofpoint

0:32:09.450 --> 0:32:12.690
<v S2>or whatever. Um, and there you have like a, you know,

0:32:12.690 --> 0:32:15.719
<v S2>an incidence or cases list where you're seeing kind of

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:19.590
<v S2>what material actually detected. Some companies set us up where

0:32:19.590 --> 0:32:21.840
<v S2>we're just auto remediating those. And again, you don't really

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:23.730
<v S2>have to log into the console. There's nothing to see.

0:32:23.730 --> 0:32:26.970
<v S2>We're just handling them. Other teams are much more hands

0:32:26.970 --> 0:32:29.400
<v S2>on where they might auto remediate, but then they want

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:31.650
<v S2>to still like triage the things that we actually caught

0:32:31.650 --> 0:32:35.100
<v S2>make sure they're not false positives. Um, you know, communicate

0:32:35.100 --> 0:32:37.620
<v S2>to end users about it, have their sort of, um,

0:32:37.620 --> 0:32:41.250
<v S2>SoC watch. That kind of really depends on how much, um,

0:32:41.250 --> 0:32:43.380
<v S2>how hands on a company wants to be. But that's

0:32:43.380 --> 0:32:44.760
<v S2>what they would see in the console.

0:32:45.330 --> 0:32:49.560
<v S1>Okay, cool. And then what is, um, the threat intelligence

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:51.660
<v S1>story look like in terms of like, hey, there's this

0:32:51.660 --> 0:32:54.930
<v S1>new campaign happening, this new vulnerability or whatever. Yeah. And

0:32:54.930 --> 0:32:57.660
<v S1>it's like it's being blasted all over the internet. Yeah. Like,

0:32:57.660 --> 0:33:00.180
<v S1>what does that turnaround gap look like for you in

0:33:00.180 --> 0:33:03.330
<v S1>terms of like, uh, finding out about it and getting

0:33:03.330 --> 0:33:04.890
<v S1>into the product and rolling it out?

0:33:04.890 --> 0:33:07.650
<v S2>Yeah, it's a great question. Um, yeah. So email is

0:33:07.650 --> 0:33:11.550
<v S2>super dynamic. There's like always new kinds of campaigns. And

0:33:11.550 --> 0:33:14.190
<v S2>people are, uh, you know, trying out new tactics to

0:33:14.190 --> 0:33:17.070
<v S2>bypass kind of a lot of the traditional defenses. So

0:33:17.070 --> 0:33:19.410
<v S2>like one of the, one of the more recent things

0:33:19.410 --> 0:33:22.650
<v S2>is like QR codes, right? Like for a while, like

0:33:22.650 --> 0:33:25.560
<v S2>a lot of detection engines weren't exploding QR codes or

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:27.510
<v S2>following the links. So that meant that like QR codes

0:33:27.510 --> 0:33:30.660
<v S2>were a really great way to deliver attacks. Um, we

0:33:30.660 --> 0:33:33.720
<v S2>have a couple different mechanisms. So first of all, one

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:36.660
<v S2>of the things our product does is it also ingests

0:33:36.660 --> 0:33:39.960
<v S2>any user reporting that is happening inside a company. So

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:42.270
<v S2>one of the best practices that every security team tries

0:33:42.270 --> 0:33:45.150
<v S2>to implement is they say, hey, uh, if you see something,

0:33:45.180 --> 0:33:48.090
<v S2>say something, right? Like, uh, and with email security, what

0:33:48.090 --> 0:33:50.520
<v S2>that normally looks like in most companies is, hey, we

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:53.670
<v S2>have this like phishing mailing list, or we have like a,

0:33:53.670 --> 0:33:57.000
<v S2>like a, like a report phishing button or something where

0:33:57.000 --> 0:33:59.580
<v S2>please report it to us if you see something. So

0:33:59.580 --> 0:34:02.490
<v S2>we have a product that automates the response to those

0:34:02.490 --> 0:34:05.729
<v S2>user reports. So it ingests them. It auto classifies and

0:34:05.730 --> 0:34:09.030
<v S2>triages them, uh, looks for similar messages that the user

0:34:09.030 --> 0:34:12.180
<v S2>may not have reported, and then even responds back to

0:34:12.180 --> 0:34:14.700
<v S2>the user saying, hey, thanks for this report. Uh, it

0:34:14.700 --> 0:34:17.489
<v S2>was fine. Or actually that was a true positive. That

0:34:17.489 --> 0:34:20.910
<v S2>was bad. Anyway, so that ends up being a great

0:34:20.910 --> 0:34:24.480
<v S2>signal because across all customers, if they are users that

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:27.540
<v S2>are reporting things that then we know are actually malicious,

0:34:27.540 --> 0:34:29.850
<v S2>that's a you know, we think of that as like

0:34:29.850 --> 0:34:31.890
<v S2>a oh, well, why didn't material just flag that in

0:34:31.890 --> 0:34:34.830
<v S2>the first place. And so it becomes this feedback loop. Um,

0:34:34.830 --> 0:34:37.710
<v S2>so the more customers we have, the more signal we

0:34:37.710 --> 0:34:39.989
<v S2>have from users reporting things. And we can quickly like

0:34:39.989 --> 0:34:42.450
<v S2>build it back into the product. The other thing is

0:34:42.450 --> 0:34:45.029
<v S2>we do have an in-house threat research team. You know,

0:34:45.030 --> 0:34:48.270
<v S2>their whole job is like focused on looking for these

0:34:48.270 --> 0:34:51.660
<v S2>active campaigns that are happening, looking for what some of

0:34:51.660 --> 0:34:54.900
<v S2>our more sophisticated customers are telling us that they're seeing,

0:34:54.900 --> 0:34:57.779
<v S2>and then quickly kind of iterating on our detection engine

0:34:57.780 --> 0:35:01.380
<v S2>to handle them. And then the the sort of like

0:35:01.380 --> 0:35:06.270
<v S2>last piece of this is, um, just investing in a

0:35:06.270 --> 0:35:09.899
<v S2>system that has a lot of flexibility. So in in

0:35:09.900 --> 0:35:13.109
<v S2>email security, there's kind of this interesting not like really

0:35:13.110 --> 0:35:15.810
<v S2>a debate, but there's this interesting kind of, uh, trend

0:35:15.810 --> 0:35:18.180
<v S2>emerging where there's a couple different approaches to the email

0:35:18.180 --> 0:35:21.090
<v S2>security problem. Like on the one hand, there's kind of

0:35:21.090 --> 0:35:24.540
<v S2>like the black box approach, which is like, hey, like AI,

0:35:24.540 --> 0:35:26.460
<v S2>machine learning, we're going to try to detect what we

0:35:26.460 --> 0:35:29.549
<v S2>can and like there aren't really knobs and tuning and

0:35:29.550 --> 0:35:31.500
<v S2>all that, but like this model is going to be

0:35:31.500 --> 0:35:33.900
<v S2>way better than trying to like handwrite a lot of rules.

0:35:33.900 --> 0:35:36.359
<v S2>Which makes sense because, you know, a lot of times

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:38.460
<v S2>you have like never before seen attacks or you have

0:35:38.460 --> 0:35:41.100
<v S2>like things that are like, you know, there's no signature

0:35:41.100 --> 0:35:43.380
<v S2>that you can kind of rely on. And also, like,

0:35:43.380 --> 0:35:45.480
<v S2>no one wants to maintain this big list of rules

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:47.459
<v S2>and things like that. So that's kind of one extreme.

0:35:47.460 --> 0:35:50.850
<v S2>The other extreme is, uh, you know, you're kind of

0:35:50.850 --> 0:35:55.080
<v S2>seeing like the detection as code, um, philosophy coming to

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:57.660
<v S2>email security as well. And people are like, hey, we

0:35:57.660 --> 0:36:00.120
<v S2>have this list of detections we maintain we're going to

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:01.859
<v S2>back test them. We're going to make sure they have

0:36:01.860 --> 0:36:04.680
<v S2>like a good precision rate. Um, and it gives a

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:06.989
<v S2>lot of control, but it means you're doing a lot yourself.

0:36:06.989 --> 0:36:09.630
<v S2>You're hand tuning a lot of things. And there are

0:36:09.630 --> 0:36:12.509
<v S2>products that kind of help you and make that easier.

0:36:12.510 --> 0:36:14.609
<v S2>There are products that help you maintain that, you know,

0:36:14.610 --> 0:36:17.960
<v S2>we have customers that. Maintain like GitHub repositories of like

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:21.290
<v S2>detections they've written, but it is kind of like very manual.

0:36:21.290 --> 0:36:23.450
<v S2>And then there's kind of somewhere in the middle where

0:36:23.450 --> 0:36:26.540
<v S2>you're like, hey, I don't want to be full black

0:36:26.540 --> 0:36:28.700
<v S2>box because they are going to be things that you miss.

0:36:28.700 --> 0:36:31.100
<v S2>And in those moments, like, you don't want to be like, oh,

0:36:31.100 --> 0:36:32.839
<v S2>I guess I'll just wait for the black box to

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:35.510
<v S2>update and catch this. But on the other hand, you

0:36:35.510 --> 0:36:37.730
<v S2>really don't want to live in a world where most

0:36:37.730 --> 0:36:39.920
<v S2>of your time as a security team is spent on

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:43.700
<v S2>like tuning or creating these, like, detections. Um, and so

0:36:43.700 --> 0:36:46.100
<v S2>what we're trying to do is like out of the box.

0:36:46.100 --> 0:36:49.580
<v S2>It's like, you know, going to be perfectly fine, have

0:36:49.580 --> 0:36:52.339
<v S2>a lot of coverage, pretty high precision, but then still

0:36:52.340 --> 0:36:55.219
<v S2>give you tools in the product where if you notice something,

0:36:55.219 --> 0:36:57.620
<v S2>if like you're aware of an active campaign that we're not,

0:36:57.620 --> 0:37:00.379
<v S2>you can quickly like express a detection in our product

0:37:00.380 --> 0:37:04.250
<v S2>or express a rule or a search query that will say, hey,

0:37:04.250 --> 0:37:06.890
<v S2>please treat this as malicious. Like, I know your whole

0:37:06.890 --> 0:37:09.650
<v S2>product hasn't updated yet, but like I know this is bad,

0:37:09.650 --> 0:37:11.779
<v S2>I just want to express it in your platform. I

0:37:11.780 --> 0:37:14.900
<v S2>should be able to. Um, so it's kind of a

0:37:14.900 --> 0:37:18.830
<v S2>product design philosophy, right? Which is like have the kind

0:37:18.830 --> 0:37:21.440
<v S2>of flexibility so that when you need it, it's available.

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:24.259
<v S2>But treat that as almost an anti metric. Like if

0:37:24.260 --> 0:37:27.860
<v S2>people are having to create those flexible leverage that flexibility

0:37:27.860 --> 0:37:30.469
<v S2>a lot. It means you're kind of doing something wrong, right.

0:37:30.469 --> 0:37:32.690
<v S2>Like you really should have done it out of the box.

0:37:32.690 --> 0:37:33.469
<v S3>I absolutely.

0:37:33.469 --> 0:37:36.470
<v S1>Love that. I don't know if, um, you ever watch

0:37:36.469 --> 0:37:39.049
<v S1>Star Trek The Next Generation, but I was obsessed with

0:37:39.050 --> 0:37:41.510
<v S1>I was obsessed with the fact that the first time

0:37:41.510 --> 0:37:44.210
<v S1>they hit a Borg with the phaser. Yeah, like it

0:37:44.210 --> 0:37:47.900
<v S1>would fall over dead. And like, the third time the

0:37:47.900 --> 0:37:52.220
<v S1>entire Borg across the entire universe was updated. Yeah. And like,

0:37:52.219 --> 0:37:55.040
<v S1>that frequency would not work anymore. And I was just like, yeah,

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:58.070
<v S1>that is, you know, I mean, security maybe.

0:37:58.310 --> 0:37:58.850
<v S3>Yeah.

0:37:58.850 --> 0:38:00.859
<v S2>I've never thought about it that way, but so true.

0:38:00.860 --> 0:38:01.640
<v S3>Yeah, yeah.

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:05.450
<v S1>So that signal that they create that would obviously apply

0:38:05.450 --> 0:38:07.910
<v S1>to their local environment. But is that is that also

0:38:07.910 --> 0:38:11.029
<v S1>a signal to the, uh, the T team to be like, hey,

0:38:11.030 --> 0:38:12.319
<v S1>maybe we should put this in.

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:15.739
<v S2>Yes, absolutely. And, um, one thing that we are very

0:38:15.739 --> 0:38:18.440
<v S2>conscious of is like, obviously we're getting access to a

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:22.610
<v S2>companies like email. It's very, very sensitive. So, so the

0:38:22.610 --> 0:38:27.170
<v S2>whole material deployment and architecture, uh, model is that every

0:38:27.170 --> 0:38:31.160
<v S2>single customer has a single tenant environment that is actually

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:33.500
<v S2>in their control. So they, they don't just get access

0:38:33.500 --> 0:38:36.890
<v S2>to our admin console like other SaaS, they actually can

0:38:36.890 --> 0:38:39.680
<v S2>log in to the underlying infrastructure that is hosting our

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:42.890
<v S2>application because it's all single tenant. And so we get

0:38:42.890 --> 0:38:45.589
<v S2>to make some pretty cool guarantees, like of isolation and

0:38:45.590 --> 0:38:48.620
<v S2>making sure that there's no data sharing happening and that like,

0:38:48.620 --> 0:38:52.040
<v S2>data isn't leaving that instance unless it's permitted by a customer.

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:55.400
<v S2>Having said that, though, a lot of our customers are

0:38:55.400 --> 0:38:59.420
<v S2>okay with a threat research team extracting the signal of, okay, what,

0:38:59.420 --> 0:39:01.670
<v S2>you know, what custom detections did you make or what

0:39:01.670 --> 0:39:04.160
<v S2>did your user reports? So where we have permission, which

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:06.590
<v S2>tends to be in most cases, we are able to

0:39:06.590 --> 0:39:08.690
<v S2>look for those signals. But I do want to point

0:39:08.690 --> 0:39:10.880
<v S2>out that there are some customers who are like, nope, sorry.

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:13.460
<v S2>Like this is too sensitive. Like we don't want your

0:39:13.460 --> 0:39:17.060
<v S2>team or anyone in material to have any access to

0:39:17.060 --> 0:39:19.940
<v S2>what we're doing. You can you can configure and deploy

0:39:19.940 --> 0:39:21.950
<v S2>us that way as well. And you know, there's kind

0:39:21.950 --> 0:39:24.800
<v S2>of like you can probably guess the types of organizations

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:26.780
<v S2>that want to deploy us in that model.

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:28.850
<v S1>No, that's a great point. And it goes to your

0:39:28.850 --> 0:39:32.300
<v S1>earlier point about flexibility. It's like you could be that

0:39:32.300 --> 0:39:36.200
<v S1>like three letter agency type group. That's like all closed doors.

0:39:36.230 --> 0:39:38.960
<v S1>Or it could be like, yeah, sharing with the Borg

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:39.590
<v S1>or whatever.

0:39:39.590 --> 0:39:40.070
<v S3>Yeah.

0:39:40.070 --> 0:39:42.799
<v S2>Yeah. Exactly. And you know, and like the nice thing

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:46.400
<v S2>here is like obviously like for these attacks and stuff

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:49.580
<v S2>for the most part, like even just like getting like

0:39:50.060 --> 0:39:53.090
<v S2>anonymized data in terms of like, like it doesn't really matter.

0:39:53.090 --> 0:39:56.120
<v S2>Like which tenant or which customer it's targeting. It's just

0:39:56.120 --> 0:39:58.160
<v S2>a fact that like, it got missed. It's something you

0:39:58.160 --> 0:40:00.319
<v S2>can tweak so you kind of don't have to reveal

0:40:00.320 --> 0:40:04.160
<v S2>anything to other customers by participating in this. But having

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:06.410
<v S2>said that, yeah, some some companies are just a lot

0:40:06.410 --> 0:40:10.370
<v S2>more closed and a lot more strict. And and that's okay. Uh,

0:40:10.370 --> 0:40:12.560
<v S2>we also have the other extreme where there's companies that

0:40:12.560 --> 0:40:14.810
<v S2>are like, dude, I just want to use this as SaaS. Like,

0:40:14.810 --> 0:40:17.000
<v S2>I don't care about the infrastructure. Like, I don't have

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:19.700
<v S2>teams that like, want to, like, log into that and like,

0:40:19.700 --> 0:40:22.520
<v S2>I'm busy. Just just give me an admin console. That's

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:24.620
<v S2>fine too, you know, like, uh, so we kind of

0:40:24.620 --> 0:40:26.450
<v S2>have support all of those models.

0:40:27.110 --> 0:40:29.840
<v S1>Okay. And what are the main products? I think we've

0:40:29.870 --> 0:40:32.450
<v S1>talked about 2 or 3 already, but like what what

0:40:32.450 --> 0:40:33.859
<v S1>are the main core products.

0:40:33.860 --> 0:40:37.610
<v S2>Yeah. So we have four main products. So the first

0:40:37.610 --> 0:40:39.649
<v S2>that we've been talking about is data protection. And that's

0:40:39.650 --> 0:40:43.550
<v S2>really focused on giving you visibility. And then the redaction

0:40:43.550 --> 0:40:46.520
<v S2>of sensitive messages that are in email. And again not

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:50.630
<v S2>like outbound emails, not things I'm now sending, but really

0:40:50.630 --> 0:40:53.029
<v S2>focused on what's sitting in your archives that's going to

0:40:53.030 --> 0:40:55.640
<v S2>get you in trouble if a, if a mailbox was compromised,

0:40:55.640 --> 0:40:57.620
<v S2>or if an insider was trying to walk with a

0:40:57.620 --> 0:40:59.720
<v S2>lot of email on their last day or something. So

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:03.020
<v S2>that's one. The second product is, uh, phishing protection. So

0:41:03.020 --> 0:41:05.810
<v S2>that is kind of the traditional email security where we're

0:41:05.810 --> 0:41:10.040
<v S2>looking for inbound attacks that may have been missed by

0:41:10.040 --> 0:41:12.350
<v S2>like a Google or a Microsoft or whatever other traditional

0:41:12.350 --> 0:41:15.020
<v S2>defenses you have in place. The third is a product

0:41:15.020 --> 0:41:18.330
<v S2>we call identity. Protection, where it's really focused on that

0:41:18.330 --> 0:41:20.910
<v S2>Dropbox example of like, hey, if you get into my

0:41:20.910 --> 0:41:24.270
<v S2>email account, can you now go reset Dropbox because you

0:41:24.270 --> 0:41:27.420
<v S2>just request a password reset? Or can you go to

0:41:27.420 --> 0:41:28.890
<v S2>slack and say, hey, can you send me one of

0:41:28.890 --> 0:41:31.350
<v S2>those magic sign in links? And then I can just

0:41:31.350 --> 0:41:33.900
<v S2>get into a slack workspace, even if slack is behind

0:41:33.900 --> 0:41:36.510
<v S2>so or MFA or whatever. Yeah. You literally click these

0:41:36.510 --> 0:41:38.190
<v S2>magic sign in links bypass link.

0:41:38.190 --> 0:41:38.550
<v S3>Yeah.

0:41:38.940 --> 0:41:41.670
<v S2>Um, so what we do there is something again, very simple.

0:41:41.670 --> 0:41:44.520
<v S2>It's another seat belt where we intercept those kinds of

0:41:44.520 --> 0:41:47.609
<v S2>messages and we make the end user prove that they

0:41:47.610 --> 0:41:50.520
<v S2>were the ones who actually requested them before delivering them.

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:53.160
<v S2>So it's very simple. Like you go request a Dropbox

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:56.670
<v S2>password reset. Now you first get an email from material

0:41:56.670 --> 0:41:59.040
<v S2>that says, hey, are you trying to reset your Dropbox password?

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:01.890
<v S2>If you say yes, the Dropbox password reset email comes

0:42:01.890 --> 0:42:04.320
<v S2>in as usual. You go about your merry way. If

0:42:04.320 --> 0:42:07.170
<v S2>you say no, though, it means like I can't be

0:42:07.170 --> 0:42:09.330
<v S2>in your mailbox and then go get access to these

0:42:09.330 --> 0:42:13.770
<v S2>lateral things. And in a in a typical enterprise organization,

0:42:13.770 --> 0:42:16.470
<v S2>which is what we normally kind of sell to, um,

0:42:16.469 --> 0:42:19.469
<v S2>you will see hundreds of apps that are still doing

0:42:19.469 --> 0:42:23.100
<v S2>password resets or sign up verifications over email, even though

0:42:23.100 --> 0:42:26.250
<v S2>they're supposed to be under SSL. So like a common

0:42:26.250 --> 0:42:30.690
<v S2>culprit is like Salesforce, uh, or, you know, workday where

0:42:30.690 --> 0:42:33.989
<v S2>like you think they're behind. So or ADP is another

0:42:33.989 --> 0:42:36.090
<v S2>one where you think you've kind of handled them, but

0:42:36.090 --> 0:42:38.550
<v S2>there's some backdoor happening over email that you like, forgot

0:42:38.550 --> 0:42:41.760
<v S2>about or you misconfigured. And then there's all these like

0:42:41.760 --> 0:42:44.730
<v S2>consumer apps that are like not never going to support

0:42:44.730 --> 0:42:47.340
<v S2>SFO but are still valid in the corporate settings. So

0:42:47.340 --> 0:42:49.920
<v S2>like Twitter I gave as an example. Right. Like obviously

0:42:49.920 --> 0:42:51.960
<v S2>your marketing team has a Twitter account, but Twitter is

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:55.650
<v S2>not going to support any type of identity thing. Um,

0:42:56.040 --> 0:42:58.680
<v S2>and then our fourth product is basically what we call

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:02.219
<v S2>posture management. And it really is about helping you understand

0:43:02.219 --> 0:43:05.430
<v S2>what's even going on with your email environment, uh, and

0:43:05.430 --> 0:43:09.960
<v S2>broadly your Google Workspace or M365 environment. So for example, um,

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:12.870
<v S2>when I was at Dropbox, if I walked into our

0:43:12.870 --> 0:43:16.919
<v S2>company and created a auto forward of all of my

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:21.000
<v S2>corporate mail to my personal Gmail, literally no one would

0:43:21.000 --> 0:43:23.549
<v S2>know and no one would come and do anything about it.

0:43:23.550 --> 0:43:26.879
<v S2>And the reason is because, um, just getting that kind

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:30.030
<v S2>of information out of like some of these productivity suites

0:43:30.030 --> 0:43:32.550
<v S2>can be very hard. And a lot of times people

0:43:32.550 --> 0:43:35.880
<v S2>haven't really built like detection or response playbooks around them,

0:43:35.880 --> 0:43:39.270
<v S2>and they can't outright block this kind of behavior from

0:43:39.270 --> 0:43:42.450
<v S2>happening because sometimes they are legitimate use cases for auto forwards,

0:43:42.450 --> 0:43:44.100
<v S2>for example. So you can't just like block it at

0:43:44.100 --> 0:43:47.400
<v S2>the tenant level. So we look for all sorts of

0:43:47.400 --> 0:43:52.830
<v S2>behavior or settings or misconfigurations in M365 or Google Workspace,

0:43:52.830 --> 0:43:55.470
<v S2>and we just surfaced them with recommendations of how to

0:43:55.469 --> 0:43:58.589
<v S2>reduce that kind of risk. And that's part of the

0:43:58.590 --> 0:44:01.020
<v S2>posture management product. So yeah, those are the four.

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:04.980
<v S1>Yeah. Those are those are great. That is they all

0:44:04.980 --> 0:44:08.820
<v S1>do definitely complement each other. I really like the last one,

0:44:08.820 --> 0:44:12.029
<v S1>especially because I feel like that is so much of

0:44:12.030 --> 0:44:15.660
<v S1>the game is like just not knowing. It's like leaving

0:44:15.660 --> 0:44:19.230
<v S1>open S3 buckets. It's like you're spending all this money

0:44:19.230 --> 0:44:22.230
<v S1>on security and then you've got this thing dangling. Yeah.

0:44:22.230 --> 0:44:25.830
<v S1>And uh, yeah, there's so many settings as well. So

0:44:25.830 --> 0:44:26.580
<v S1>it's hard for me.

0:44:26.969 --> 0:44:29.069
<v S2>I actually think that, you know, it's a funny story

0:44:29.070 --> 0:44:31.650
<v S2>about that. When we first started the company, it was

0:44:31.650 --> 0:44:35.250
<v S2>just the data protection, uh, feature, the redaction one. That's

0:44:35.250 --> 0:44:36.960
<v S2>really what led us to start this company in the

0:44:36.960 --> 0:44:40.379
<v S2>first place. When we went and talked to CISOs or

0:44:40.380 --> 0:44:43.169
<v S2>security teams about that, the first question we would obviously

0:44:43.170 --> 0:44:46.590
<v S2>get is like, hey, cool. Like you have this awesome

0:44:46.590 --> 0:44:50.400
<v S2>control for sensitive content in the mailbox. What sensitive content

0:44:50.400 --> 0:44:52.920
<v S2>do I even have in mailboxes? Like, right. Like, do

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:55.200
<v S2>I even need this? Like, I have no idea. Like,

0:44:55.200 --> 0:44:57.660
<v S2>it's like, I suspect that I probably need this, but like,

0:44:57.660 --> 0:45:00.450
<v S2>I have no idea. And so we were like, oh shit. Like,

0:45:00.450 --> 0:45:03.300
<v S2>obviously like step one is to give you visibility and

0:45:03.300 --> 0:45:06.990
<v S2>help you understand what even is there. And so, like, selfishly,

0:45:06.989 --> 0:45:09.180
<v S2>for us, it kind of helped us tell the story

0:45:09.180 --> 0:45:10.980
<v S2>of why you need some of the controls that we're

0:45:10.980 --> 0:45:15.180
<v S2>talking about, but also for, for security teams, it's often

0:45:15.180 --> 0:45:17.640
<v S2>step one anyway, which is just like, okay, like now

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:19.560
<v S2>I have a lay of the land. The other thing

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:22.530
<v S2>is you kind of mentioned the S3 bucket. And that

0:45:22.530 --> 0:45:26.100
<v S2>I think is a really great point. Like it is

0:45:26.100 --> 0:45:29.490
<v S2>a very well understood in cloud security that like, you know,

0:45:29.489 --> 0:45:33.660
<v S2>Cspm is like cnaps all this stuff like are very,

0:45:33.660 --> 0:45:36.600
<v S2>you know, well understood category. People understand why they need

0:45:36.630 --> 0:45:39.359
<v S2>them because there's all this stuff happening in your cloud environment.

0:45:39.360 --> 0:45:43.980
<v S2>There's different teams, uh, creating like software, uh, all these

0:45:43.980 --> 0:45:46.830
<v S2>settings to think about. And so you need a platform

0:45:46.830 --> 0:45:49.830
<v S2>that's like looking at behavior, looking at vulnerabilities and kind

0:45:49.830 --> 0:45:53.100
<v S2>of like showcasing the top, riskiest ones and helping you

0:45:53.100 --> 0:45:57.060
<v S2>address them literally, word for word. Everything I just said

0:45:57.060 --> 0:46:01.410
<v S2>applies to the productivity suite, right? Like M365 and Google Workspace.

0:46:01.410 --> 0:46:05.009
<v S2>And yet there isn't really a cspm equivalent for just

0:46:05.010 --> 0:46:10.440
<v S2>those products. There's there are SPM tools where they're like, oh, well,

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:13.980
<v S2>we cover 50 apps and M365 is one of them.

0:46:13.980 --> 0:46:16.500
<v S2>And because they cover 50. The apps. It's hard for

0:46:16.500 --> 0:46:19.860
<v S2>them to go deep on the productivity suite. Um, and

0:46:19.860 --> 0:46:23.399
<v S2>so they'll give a some surface level detections, but the

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:25.980
<v S2>sort of like depth of a cspm that is entirely

0:46:25.980 --> 0:46:30.690
<v S2>focused on cloud security does not exist for the productivity suite.

0:46:30.690 --> 0:46:33.270
<v S2>And it's an area that we're at material like, very

0:46:33.270 --> 0:46:36.570
<v S2>excited about pursuing, because I don't really see a good

0:46:36.570 --> 0:46:38.189
<v S2>reason that there isn't an equivalent.

0:46:39.020 --> 0:46:42.469
<v S1>Yeah, especially when the implications of a setting being one

0:46:42.469 --> 0:46:47.090
<v S1>way versus another are so huge. Yeah, right. And there's

0:46:47.090 --> 0:46:49.310
<v S1>also a lot of opportunity there to be like, look

0:46:49.310 --> 0:46:52.160
<v S1>you are this type of risk posture of a company.

0:46:52.160 --> 0:46:55.430
<v S1>You really care about these relationships or whatever. So out

0:46:55.430 --> 0:46:59.570
<v S1>of the 312 settings available in this platform, we recommend

0:46:59.570 --> 0:47:00.740
<v S1>the following settings three.

0:47:00.739 --> 0:47:03.049
<v S2>Yeah, totally. Um, and it's kind of similar to what

0:47:03.050 --> 0:47:04.700
<v S2>you were saying earlier, right? Like if you make a

0:47:04.700 --> 0:47:08.450
<v S2>register of the like most common attacks anyway, and you

0:47:08.450 --> 0:47:11.089
<v S2>just start with that, like here, here, like the 10

0:47:11.090 --> 0:47:14.240
<v S2>or 15 things that like are almost always the culprits

0:47:14.239 --> 0:47:17.509
<v S2>like and again, Cspm learned that a while ago and

0:47:17.510 --> 0:47:19.819
<v S2>I think they're like, okay. Yeah. Like we keep leaving

0:47:19.820 --> 0:47:23.000
<v S2>buckets open, like, let's stop doing this. You know, I

0:47:23.000 --> 0:47:26.540
<v S2>think that there are equivalents, uh, in, for example, like

0:47:26.540 --> 0:47:28.940
<v S2>we have a product, we have a fifth product that

0:47:28.940 --> 0:47:31.910
<v S2>I actually forgot to mention that is very new, and

0:47:31.910 --> 0:47:34.549
<v S2>it focuses on Google Drive. So a lot of the

0:47:34.550 --> 0:47:36.740
<v S2>same stuff that we had heard over the years with

0:47:36.739 --> 0:47:40.760
<v S2>sensitive content in email, people were like, our customers were like, hey,

0:47:41.150 --> 0:47:43.100
<v S2>I have a lot of these problems with Google Drive,

0:47:43.100 --> 0:47:47.180
<v S2>like just the files. And, um, and that product is

0:47:47.180 --> 0:47:50.060
<v S2>all about detecting kind of oversharing, because a lot of

0:47:50.060 --> 0:47:53.270
<v S2>times what happens is it literally equivalent to the S3 bucket?

0:47:53.270 --> 0:47:55.940
<v S2>You might have some file that was shared at one

0:47:55.940 --> 0:47:59.450
<v S2>point with anyone with the link permissions, uh, even though

0:47:59.450 --> 0:48:01.910
<v S2>like it didn't need to be and it's got sensitive content.

0:48:01.910 --> 0:48:03.680
<v S2>And now it's been two years since anyone has ever

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:07.130
<v S2>looked at it. But, you know, it's mentioned in some

0:48:07.130 --> 0:48:09.109
<v S2>email that might be part of a breach. And now

0:48:09.110 --> 0:48:11.960
<v S2>all of a sudden it's accessible. So how do you

0:48:11.960 --> 0:48:13.640
<v S2>go clean that up? Like you're not going to have

0:48:13.640 --> 0:48:16.759
<v S2>a security team that's sitting around like auditing their Google Drive,

0:48:16.760 --> 0:48:19.520
<v S2>which has like millions of files. So you can automate that.

0:48:19.520 --> 0:48:21.530
<v S2>You can do things like, hey, if it has sensitive

0:48:21.530 --> 0:48:24.589
<v S2>content and it also has these permissions like revoke them

0:48:24.590 --> 0:48:26.660
<v S2>in this way and notify the owner so you can

0:48:26.660 --> 0:48:30.620
<v S2>build workflows and kind of get the end users involved.

0:48:30.620 --> 0:48:32.840
<v S2>Because that's the only way to have like a tenable

0:48:32.840 --> 0:48:35.360
<v S2>solution there. Otherwise you're just going to have a security

0:48:35.360 --> 0:48:37.700
<v S2>team that is trying to like, go through a giant

0:48:37.700 --> 0:48:40.130
<v S2>backlog of these and will never prioritize it. And it's

0:48:40.130 --> 0:48:42.290
<v S2>just one of those, like, active risks just sitting there.

0:48:42.560 --> 0:48:44.780
<v S3>Um, yeah, absolutely.

0:48:44.780 --> 0:48:48.920
<v S1>Any new research or new new exciting stuff coming out soon?

0:48:49.400 --> 0:48:52.160
<v S2>Yeah. The thing that I'm very excited about is kind

0:48:52.160 --> 0:48:53.900
<v S2>of what I was alluding to. So maybe I'll describe

0:48:53.900 --> 0:48:56.180
<v S2>it in a little bit more detail. But basically we

0:48:56.180 --> 0:48:59.450
<v S2>think that, um, there is an opportunity to do more

0:48:59.450 --> 0:49:02.270
<v S2>than just email. Email is just one part of this

0:49:02.270 --> 0:49:06.650
<v S2>suite of products, obviously, uh, which includes like files and

0:49:06.650 --> 0:49:09.799
<v S2>chat and all the posture and settings that come with

0:49:09.800 --> 0:49:13.280
<v S2>the productivity suites. And we kind of want to broaden

0:49:13.280 --> 0:49:16.370
<v S2>and cover more and more of that. Uh, and so

0:49:16.370 --> 0:49:20.210
<v S2>the really new thing for us is broadening beyond email.

0:49:20.210 --> 0:49:22.760
<v S2>We did that with Google Drive. Um, we plan to

0:49:22.760 --> 0:49:26.210
<v S2>do something similar on the Microsoft side in the future. Um,

0:49:26.210 --> 0:49:29.569
<v S2>and then, uh, where it gets really interesting though, is

0:49:29.570 --> 0:49:32.600
<v S2>you now unlock kind of new types of correlations. You

0:49:32.600 --> 0:49:37.460
<v S2>can do if you have access to content, uh, settings

0:49:37.460 --> 0:49:40.850
<v S2>and logs, you can really correlate these things together. So

0:49:40.850 --> 0:49:43.969
<v S2>like let me give you a simple example. Um, let's

0:49:43.969 --> 0:49:48.109
<v S2>say that I have a Google group that allows external

0:49:48.110 --> 0:49:50.509
<v S2>people to post to it. That is a very common

0:49:50.510 --> 0:49:53.359
<v S2>thing that exists in basically every company because you have

0:49:53.360 --> 0:49:57.050
<v S2>like support at or you have like, you know, help

0:49:57.050 --> 0:49:59.719
<v S2>at or whatever. But now let's say that that Google

0:49:59.719 --> 0:50:03.350
<v S2>Group also has weak moderation settings, spam moderation settings, which,

0:50:03.350 --> 0:50:05.660
<v S2>by the way, is their default for Google groups. Don't

0:50:05.660 --> 0:50:08.089
<v S2>ask me why, but that's the default. Okay, so that's

0:50:08.090 --> 0:50:10.850
<v S2>a little worse because now I can like, use this

0:50:10.850 --> 0:50:15.469
<v S2>Google group to send you, uh, malicious emails that may

0:50:15.469 --> 0:50:18.680
<v S2>bypass your like, existing controls because the spam moderation settings

0:50:18.680 --> 0:50:21.200
<v S2>are lower. So that's those two things are a little

0:50:21.200 --> 0:50:23.390
<v S2>bit worse. And now let's say that that same Google

0:50:23.390 --> 0:50:25.790
<v S2>group is actually the one that like your CEO is

0:50:25.790 --> 0:50:28.190
<v S2>a member of, or you're like, finance guy is a

0:50:28.190 --> 0:50:31.850
<v S2>member of. Now it's like even worse because it's like, okay, well,

0:50:31.850 --> 0:50:34.880
<v S2>if I want to like do like a high profile attack,

0:50:34.880 --> 0:50:38.240
<v S2>I have now a path into a VIP. So in

0:50:38.239 --> 0:50:41.360
<v S2>Google Workspace today to get each of these three signals

0:50:41.360 --> 0:50:44.900
<v S2>are different API calls. Um, and you have to kind

0:50:44.900 --> 0:50:47.810
<v S2>of correlate them together and write your own detection in

0:50:47.810 --> 0:50:49.550
<v S2>the future. What we want to do with material is

0:50:49.550 --> 0:50:52.550
<v S2>like basically have our threat research team come up with

0:50:52.550 --> 0:50:55.820
<v S2>a lot of these common scenarios that we see express

0:50:55.820 --> 0:50:58.550
<v S2>them as detections that just come out of the box

0:50:58.550 --> 0:51:02.300
<v S2>and help you really attack these and, and leverage the

0:51:02.300 --> 0:51:04.970
<v S2>fact that we have the content access, but we also

0:51:04.969 --> 0:51:09.080
<v S2>have the, uh, settings and log data access, because when

0:51:09.080 --> 0:51:11.450
<v S2>you can put those three things together, that's where like

0:51:11.450 --> 0:51:14.419
<v S2>you can build some really high signal detections. One big

0:51:14.420 --> 0:51:16.759
<v S2>problem with Cspm, since we were talking about them in

0:51:16.760 --> 0:51:21.200
<v S2>the past, is a long time, uh, ago, like people

0:51:21.200 --> 0:51:22.910
<v S2>kind of almost gave up on them because they used

0:51:22.910 --> 0:51:26.000
<v S2>to have so much noise. Right? It's like it was untenable.

0:51:26.000 --> 0:51:28.550
<v S2>It's like you go in, it's like million issues detected

0:51:28.550 --> 0:51:30.230
<v S2>and you're like, great, I'm never going to do anything

0:51:30.230 --> 0:51:32.960
<v S2>about this. What I think the modern Cspm did a

0:51:32.960 --> 0:51:35.300
<v S2>really good job with, you know, like, I'm like, thinking of, like,

0:51:35.300 --> 0:51:38.350
<v S2>The Wiz or Orca's of the world. Is. He said, well,

0:51:38.469 --> 0:51:40.570
<v S2>actually we are going to have a million issues, but

0:51:40.570 --> 0:51:43.870
<v S2>out of those million, there's probably 40 that you really, really,

0:51:43.870 --> 0:51:47.410
<v S2>really need to address. And those are like these, uh,

0:51:47.410 --> 0:51:49.750
<v S2>those are those like attack paths, the ones that like,

0:51:49.750 --> 0:51:53.259
<v S2>correlate 3 or 4 different things together, and they raise

0:51:53.260 --> 0:51:56.200
<v S2>the severity of that detection. Um, I think it's a

0:51:56.200 --> 0:51:58.060
<v S2>really smart model. And I think it's kind of what

0:51:58.060 --> 0:52:01.180
<v S2>we want to do on the, on the, uh, workspace side.

0:52:02.060 --> 0:52:05.330
<v S1>Yeah, I love that. I feel like everything is going

0:52:05.480 --> 0:52:10.160
<v S1>eventually towards this, uh, inevitable place, which is gather all

0:52:10.160 --> 0:52:12.500
<v S1>the context and point intelligence at it.

0:52:12.500 --> 0:52:14.180
<v S3>Yeah. Right.

0:52:14.180 --> 0:52:17.750
<v S1>And so I love the fact that you're bringing together

0:52:17.750 --> 0:52:21.050
<v S1>all that different context, the state of the configuration of

0:52:21.050 --> 0:52:21.980
<v S1>the platform.

0:52:21.980 --> 0:52:22.460
<v S3>Yes.

0:52:22.460 --> 0:52:26.779
<v S1>The things you're concerned about, actual logs plus threat intelligence.

0:52:26.780 --> 0:52:28.310
<v S1>Now you've got a real picture.

0:52:28.310 --> 0:52:31.850
<v S2>Exactly. And this was kind of the promise of XDR

0:52:31.850 --> 0:52:35.180
<v S2>or whatever. But I think that the, the challenge is

0:52:35.180 --> 0:52:36.860
<v S2>that like if you try to do it for all

0:52:36.860 --> 0:52:40.759
<v S2>security across all platforms, it really does feel like a

0:52:40.760 --> 0:52:44.450
<v S2>gnarly kind of untenable problem. So where I think people

0:52:44.450 --> 0:52:46.820
<v S2>have done a good job is where they've kind of

0:52:46.820 --> 0:52:50.120
<v S2>carved a boundary so that they can focus and kind

0:52:50.120 --> 0:52:52.760
<v S2>of go deep. Uh, the thing that I think hasn't

0:52:52.760 --> 0:52:54.950
<v S2>worked is when you kind of create like a very

0:52:54.950 --> 0:52:57.020
<v S2>horizontal products that are a mile wide and an inch

0:52:57.020 --> 0:53:00.620
<v S2>deep because they just can't really get to the to

0:53:00.620 --> 0:53:02.630
<v S2>the true insights, and they end up just spamming you

0:53:02.630 --> 0:53:04.790
<v S2>with something that's like, yes, it's a risk, but is

0:53:04.790 --> 0:53:06.950
<v S2>it really your top priority? And you just, you know,

0:53:06.950 --> 0:53:09.980
<v S2>I've talked to some CISOs who talk about those products, uh,

0:53:09.980 --> 0:53:12.350
<v S2>as like kind of report card products where it's like,

0:53:12.350 --> 0:53:14.420
<v S2>let's just make you feel bad, you know, and it's like, yeah, yeah,

0:53:14.690 --> 0:53:17.960
<v S2>like much to do. I think what, what we are

0:53:17.960 --> 0:53:20.569
<v S2>interested in is trying to find the balance between, yeah,

0:53:20.570 --> 0:53:23.510
<v S2>broadened beyond email, but kind of still focus really on

0:53:23.510 --> 0:53:26.150
<v S2>this productivity suite so that you can still go deep

0:53:26.150 --> 0:53:29.270
<v S2>and not get overextended. Um, and it's a it's a

0:53:29.270 --> 0:53:32.299
<v S2>tricky balance, but I think like that kind of going

0:53:32.300 --> 0:53:36.290
<v S2>into the full XDR thing is probably a little too broad. Yeah.

0:53:37.040 --> 0:53:37.820
<v S3>Well, cool.

0:53:37.820 --> 0:53:40.460
<v S1>Where can people learn more about material?

0:53:40.760 --> 0:53:44.330
<v S2>Yeah. Head over to material Dot security. We try to,

0:53:44.360 --> 0:53:46.910
<v S2>you know, explain what we do in really simple terms.

0:53:46.910 --> 0:53:49.730
<v S2>There's like videos and stuff that show how the product works.

0:53:49.730 --> 0:53:52.820
<v S2>So that's the best way to learn about material and

0:53:53.000 --> 0:53:54.680
<v S2>reach out if you'd like to learn more.

0:53:55.070 --> 0:53:57.350
<v S1>Awesome. Well, I love the approach. I love the way

0:53:57.350 --> 0:53:59.990
<v S1>you're thinking about this. It's exactly the way that I

0:53:59.989 --> 0:54:03.020
<v S1>would approach this. Awesome. So I really, really great to

0:54:03.020 --> 0:54:05.870
<v S1>hear it. And, uh, I enjoyed the conversation.

0:54:05.870 --> 0:54:07.610
<v S2>Yeah. Me too. Thank you so much.

0:54:07.760 --> 0:54:09.770
<v S1>All right. Take care. See you.